Google Chromebook marks its 15th anniversary — slow feature rollouts and a canceled Steam beta leave it largely stuck in classrooms
A cloud-first experience remains out of favor among enthusiasts, however hard big tech tries to push it.
Today marks 15 years since the first Chromebooks hit the market. Google partnered with Acer and Samsung to get a range of devices ready for the big launch day in 2011. While the platform has gone on to enjoy enviable success in the education market, it continues to be sidelined in mainstream and premium markets, despite the best efforts of Google and partners.
Google’s vision in 2011 was to “make computing simpler and more accessible for everyone.” It arrived with this goal at the tail end of the netbook era, where there was a proliferation of cheap Windows thin and light designs that were infamous for becoming tragically slow in a short time. Some might describe the first Chromebooks as cloud-first evolutions of netbooks – and they indeed made much better use of limited hardware with fast boot times, browser-based workflows, and everything done in the cloud, easing the demands on the (typically) anemic hardware.
Mainstream and premium laptop users, perhaps stung by netbook experiences, have never warmed to Chromebooks, though. Google and partners have invested in high-end product development across several generations, to no avail. Chromebooks seem to be firmly entrenched in K-12 education computing, and can’t escape from that niche.
We’d probably conclude that Google Chromebooks missed their chance in the early 20-teens by holding back some of the best initiatives we are seeing on the platform now. For example, it took until 2016 for the Google Play Store to arrive on Chromebooks, in 2018 Linux app support was added, it took until 2019 for Steam gaming support (beta, recently killed though) to arrive, and until 2021 for ChromeOS Flex to be released to install on out-of-support old PCs and Macs, and only in 2023 did Google decide to ensure new Chromebooks got a decent (10 years) length of OS support. Google could have gone all-in with its best features earlier on, instead of wasting time and resources on the ridiculously expensive Pixelbook (2017), for example.
Nevertheless, as noted above, Chromebooks are now an undeniable success in the education segment. In K-12, the platform still looks unassailable due to a number of factors. Probably the most important features in its favor in this segment are the platform’s lower costs, centralized management, and ruggedized options available.
Chromebooks have also earned a reputation for reliability and security. Research suggests the platform requires fewer tech support calls than rival computing platforms. Last but not least, the recent change to a 10-year device updates support guarantee should cement the Chromebook platform’s good reputation.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.
-
usertests Reply
What, do they not pay for H.265 licensing? Most chips should have hardware decode.PEnns said:And it still doesn't have decent video codecs to play a movie....
Whatever the case, it's an imperiled ecosystem that could be replaced by "Googlebook" (blegh) -
hotaru251 Google should have been sued to hell and back for their piss poor e-waste they sold to schools.Reply -
usertests Reply
I think you can convert many of them into Linux laptops. Other aspects like soldered RAM are simply industry trends.hotaru251 said:Google should have been sued to hell and back for their piss poor e-waste they sold to schools. -
Moonstick2 Reply
I've one I picked up from eBay that I set up to chroot with antiX Linux, which basically means you boot into ChromeOS, run Linux from within it and then you can switch seamlessly back and forth with a keyboard combo. I almost exclusively used it within Linux and it was perfectly serviceable, the main advantage being it was compact and super-kind on the battery: I'd just close the lid to have it sleep, then if I needed it I picked it up opened it and could start doing what I needed instantly. Unless I was using it heavily it only needed charging every few days despite being used most of them.usertests said:I think you can convert many of them into Linux laptops.
When ChromeOS stopped getting updated I eventually changed it to only have antiX and again it worked without fault. I eventually upgraded to a different laptop and rarely touch it now, but I got nearly a decade of decent use out of that £68 purchase. -
usertests Reply
There must be a memory impact from that. For 2-4 GB "e-waste" machines, you'll probably want to stick with one or the other.Moonstick2 said:I've one I picked up from eBay that I set up to chroot with antiX Linux, which basically means you boot into ChromeOS, run Linux from within it and then you can switch seamlessly back and forth with a keyboard combo. -
ezst036 Anything with the Google name brand on it carries a creep factor of 11.Reply
Its basically a living and breathing wiretap. -
circadia Reply
eh.... might be unrelated, but MediaTek silicon + Google bullshittery means that it's rather unlikely to see any efforts similar to Asahi Linux for the "Googlebook" thing, and in fact, very few current ARM Chromebooks (even the ones with Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets) are able to boot straight into Linux distros without ChromeOS...usertests said:What, do they not pay for H.265 licensing? Most chips should have hardware decode.
Whatever the case, it's an imperiled ecosystem that could be replaced by "Googlebook" (blegh)
pfft. as if no other devices do wiretap these days. if you want to live a (mostly) normal life you cannot cut off everything at once and right away.ezst036 said:Anything with the Google name brand on it carries a creep factor of 11.
Its basically a living and breathing wiretap. -
Moonstick2 Reply
Depends on how you use it. For me ChromeOS was largely 'idle', nothing open in it. But I could cut across into it out of antiX, do some specific Google-related stuff, close that down and cut back and carry on. Even on 2GB it never felt laggy (this was basically light use, we're not talking opening 50 tabs or running games here) and I had the option of either OSs without even suffering the time-delay of a reboot and having to shut down the Linux stuff to switch.usertests said:There must be a memory impact from that. For 2-4 GB "e-waste" machines, you'll probably want to stick with one or the other.
As I said, eventually I stripped out ChromeOS and installed antiX as the sole OS, but only because that Chromebook was no longer getting security updates so keeping ChromeOS was pointless. -
ezst036 Reply
Yes, everything is being Google-fied these days. Still.......... for computers and also for phones avoiding being wiretapped is easy. Just wipe out the old and clean-install Linux.circadia said:pfft. as if no other devices do wiretap these days.
Note: Yes, this is harder to do on phones. But not at all impossible. Android and Windows partitions can be obliterated.