LG Display introduces new OLED deposition technique that uses lithography instead of metal masks — "FLiPP" photolithography delivers 1.6x brightness and 2.4x longer lifespan
LG describes it as a dream OLED display.
LG Display has just unveiled perhaps the biggest innovation in OLED manufacturing in a while, aptly called "FLiPP" or FMM-less Innovative Pixel Patterning. FMM stands for Fine Metal Masks, and they're required as a stencil to deposit organic LEDs onto a glass substrate. FLiPP gets rid of these and instead relies on photolithography to vaporize unneeded areas from an RGB subpixel to produce a brighter panel that takes less power to drive and is ultimately cheaper to produce.
The main benefit of FLiPP is how it increases the subpixel surface area in an OLED stack. Instead of the metal mask taking up space, the subpixels are spread out much closer to each other, which improves their "aperture ratio" by up to 55%. In reality, that translates to 1.6x brighter panels with 2.4x longer lifespans. Since the panel doesn't have to work as hard to drive the pixels, its power consumption drops by 13% as well.
A metal mask is also heavy and can thus sag in the middle, leading to panel uniformity or color blending issues. It's expensive to make, too, because it features tiny holes that scale up in precision depending on resolution and size. FLiPP eliminates those constraints entirely, as it can, in theory, produce panels ranging from 1-100 inches for a broad range of devices and applications with any resolution in mind.
For instance, whenever new panel tech emerges, a new metal mask needs to be created to specifically accommodate its subpixel layout. A majority of the OLED materials are wasted during the stencil process; only about 30% make it through the stencil on the motherglass. Moreover, the motherglass needs to be cut in half for larger displays because of the mask's unstable structure just so be joined back together after deposition.
FLiPP uses a process akin to semiconductor manufacturing where UV light reacts with a photoresist layer through a micron-sharp photomask. A bed of organic material, such as the red subpixels, is first deposited, and a photoresist layer is applied on top. The UV changes the chemical bonds of the areas that should have red subpixels, hardening and locking them into place. The glass then goes through a chemical bath to dissolve away everything else.
The process is repeated for the green and blue subpixels until the desired layout is achieved. LG says this method utilizes 64% more of the motherglass when producing laptop-sized panels, leading to less wastage, which will make displays cheaper. The company has already internally produced an OLED panel that used an entire 8.5-Gen motherglass through FLiPP, which measures at 2,200mm x 2,500mm.
LG is currently looking to apply FLiPP to its RGB OLED technology, which means self-emissive red, green, and blue subpixels will be deposited directly onto a motherglass. Otherwise, in Samsung's QD-OLED and LG's WOLED, white (or blue) LEDs pass through color filters to produce red, green, and blue, instead. Therefore, the combination of RGB OLED and FLiPP could lead to panels with exceptional color volume and gamut coverage — traditionally weaknesses of OLED.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
FLiPP is not the only FMM-less OLED deposition technique on the market, but it does seem to be the first to be commercialized on a massive scale. Japan Display Inc.'s eLEAP is actually the pioneer of maskless OLED photolithography, and LG was said to enter into some sort of partnership with them last year, though FLiPP is marketed entirely as an LG invention. China's Visionox also has its own version that it plans to release next year.
Inkjet printing is increasingly gaining traction in the OLED world as an alternative method, too, and TCL CSOT is currently at the forefront of its development. As far as FLiPP is concerned, LG promises to invest 3 trillion Won, or $2.15 billion, to begin production using this tech by late 2027. Laptops and monitors will be the first recipients of FLiPP OLED screens before expanding to smartwatches and ultra-large TVs.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.
Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.
-
jp7189 Assuming good color accuracy and response times, this looks really promising... esp. for VR micro displaysReply -
CelicaGT LG is on the "Never again." list due to their malware installing monitors. Microsoft will be there once I can get through an upgrade cycle and onto an AMD GPU for a proper Bazzite build. Why Microsoft? Because the said malware is pulled down through Windows Update.Reply -
hush now unfortunately the production savings will never reach consumers so its really pointless for us to hear about this. good for the LG OLED shareholders I guess.Reply -
usertests Reply
Meh. It's adware, not malware, and it was delivered by Microsoft. No point in holding a nerd grudge against LG forever, just get onto Linux and check yoself.CelicaGT said:LG is on the "Never again." list due to their malware installing monitors. Microsoft will be there once I can get through an upgrade cycle and onto an AMD GPU for a proper Bazzite build. Why Microsoft? Because the said malware is pulled down through Windows Update.
I was less interested in the savings, and more in the technical superiority of this version of OLED.hush now said:unfortunately the production savings will never reach consumers so its really pointless for us to hear about this. good for the LG OLED shareholders I guess.
OLED is already "cheap" and relatively ubiquitous. We want MicroLED or similar successors to take over, but it will take a long time for the transition to happen. In the meantime, if new techniques are increasing brightness, lifespan, and efficiency of OLED, that's an absolute win for the consumer.
Display pricing has been a bright spot during these trying times. -
CelicaGT Reply
Because it is installed without user knowledge or consent, it meets the legal definition of malware. Actual laws were broken with this (depending on region). They're in deep caca over it in many places.usertests said:Meh. It's adware, not malware, and it was delivered by Microsoft. No point in holding a nerd grudge against LG forever, just get onto Linux and check yoself.
I was less interested in the savings, and more in the technical superiority of this version of OLED.
OLED is already "cheap" and relatively ubiquitous. We want MicroLED or similar successors to take over, but it will take a long time for the transition to happen. In the meantime, if new techniques are increasing brightness, lifespan, and efficiency of OLED, that's an absolute win for the consumer.
Display pricing has been a bright spot during these trying times.
Agreed on MicroLED. -
bit_user Just tell me when I can buy a panel made this way! I've been waiting almost 20 years to buy an OLED monitor and still holding out, just a bit longer.Reply -
bit_user Reply
A lot of monitors use LG panels, even though they're not LG-branded. That's true of both LCD and OLED technologies.CelicaGT said:LG is on the "Never again." list due to their malware installing monitors. -
FoxTread3 Reply
I totally agree with you. I have a few LG products, and really thought very highly of the company. Until.. I found out that I can't use the voice command on the remote control for my LG 55' OLED TV, because I won't let it spy on me. Now we have the issue of spyware on LG computer monitors. This begs the question as to why LG seems to need to "double dip" to increase their profits. Isn't selling good products enough for them? A rhetorical question obviously. 😏 Big Tech's business model continues to be, "when you buy our products/services", we own you, and the information about you that we can sell." I will never buy another LG product if there is something of equal price and quality available. Stay well.CelicaGT said:LG is on the "Never again." list due to their malware installing monitors. Microsoft will be there once I can get through an upgrade cycle and onto an AMD GPU for a proper Bazzite build. Why Microsoft? Because the said malware is pulled down through Windows Update. -
bit_user Reply
My HiSense projector is similar, in that it disables content-specific enhancements if I won't agree to the additional information disclosure of my viewing habits.FoxTread3 said:I found out that I can't use the voice command on the remote control for my LG 55' OLED TV, because I won't let it spy on me.
Can you specify exactly what you're referring to? The term "spyware" is quite broad and can mean many different things.FoxTread3 said:Now we have the issue of spyware on LG computer monitors.
Race to the bottom. Low-cost competitors undercut them on price, so they have to cut their prices to compete. Then, they have to tap other revenue streams in order to remain profitable. And when one of them taps the adware business model, it becomes almost impossible for the others to resist.FoxTread3 said:This begs the question as to why LG seems to need to "double dip" to increase their profits. Isn't selling good products enough for them?
The alternative would be bankruptcy or at least having to exit the consumer market. Neither of those is a win for consumers.
The solution is to have laws which ban this practice, so that everyone stays on an even playing field. Hate the game, not the players. -
FoxTread3 Reply
August 22, 2026 (dated for context and reference) - 1) You said - "Can you specify exactly what you're referring to? The term "spyware" is quite broad and can mean many different things." Correct.. I agree. I am not going to get into semantics here. The point is, manufacturers are gathering information from customers that purchase their products.. either overtly, or covertly. The outcome is the same. They are getting information that is useful to them for various reasons.bit_user said:My HiSense projector is similar, in that it disables content-specific enhancements if I won't agree to the additional information disclosure of my viewing habits.
Can you specify exactly what you're referring to? The term "spyware" is quite broad and can mean many different things.
Race to the bottom. Low-cost competitors undercut them on price, so they have to cut their prices to compete. Then, they have to tap other revenue streams in order to remain profitable. And when one of them taps the adware business model, it becomes almost impossible for the others to resist.
The alternative would be bankruptcy or at least having to exit the consumer market. Neither of those is a win for consumers.
The solution is to have laws which ban this practice, so that everyone stays on an even playing field. Hate the game, not the players.
2) You said - "The alternative would be bankruptcy or at least having to exit the consumer market. Neither of those is a win for consumers." I disagree, other companies do NOT resort to that kind of business model, and are profitable. LG as an example has a tremendous market share when it comes to their products. They built their reputation by producing quality products. If that business model isn't working for them. Then yes, they can live the market, and others will grow their businesses that are more customer friendly. To my knowledge, Dell for example, does NOT use the LG business model and produces excellent products, though no company is perfect.
3) You said - "The solution is to have laws which ban this practice, so that everyone stays on an even playing field." True, and I agree. While I am NOT a fan of some of the E.U.'s anti-business regulations. I do feel that they are more on the side of the consumer. The U.S. Congress on the other hand is considered by many to be the best Congress that money can buy. The U.S. traditionally has favored business over the concerns and rights of the consumer. They have basically turned "a blind eye" to many companies' business practices.
4) You said - " Hate the game, not the players." I disagree. The "players" have a choice as to the business model they pursue. If they choose to alienate consumers like myself, then so be it. I will NOT purchase their products. To me, your argument is analogous to, "Well.. if a meat producing company wants to put rat meat in their beef products. It is up to government to prohibit that practice." The point is, if a meat producing company offers rat meat in their "beef" products, overtly or covertly. It is up to the consumers, to not purchase their products, and yes, the government should step in to prevent the practice. In any event, I personally will be extremely careful as to the products I purchase from any manufacturer. Stay well.