Intel Posts $500 Million Loss for the First Time in Decades as Sales Drop 17%

Intel
(Image credit: Intel)
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • InvalidError
    Looking forward to seeing how Intel's plans to raise retail prices will square off against sales already receding by 16-25% at current pricing.

    This shouldn't be surprising anybody, the ~30% bumper sales from COVID WFH and stimulus handouts were never going to convert into sustained repeat sales. Especially not in the immediate wake of everyone who hadn't semi-recently upgraded rushing to upgrade at the same time, monster inflation on essential goods and a global economic slowdown.
    Reply
  • BigD1
    Chips Act just passed at 52 billion. Intel will get lots of that money.
    Reply
  • btmedic04
    I'm willing to bet untel is seriously eyeing up its graphics division for the chopping block. Arc is underperformed and super late to the party
    Reply
  • escksu
    btmedic04 said:
    I'm willing to bet untel is seriously eyeing up its graphics division for the chopping block. Arc is underperformed and super late to the party

    Nope it won't. Arc is not the main product of graphics division. Its real product is ponte vecchio.
    Reply
  • spongiemaster
    It was just reported in another article that Intel wrote off $559 million in Optane inventory in Q2. All around terrible quarter for Intel. At some point they're going to have to start delivering on all their promises. Where is Sapphire Rapids? Where are the GPU's? Looks like Raptor Lake is on schedule, but that's basically an Alder Lake refresh. The real question is, is Meteor Lake still on schedule which is on a new node?
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    50% tax...
    Also they are building new FABs, all of their income is being spend on" Net additions to property, plant and equipment"
    Reply
  • KyaraM
    btmedic04 said:
    I'm willing to bet untel is seriously eyeing up its graphics division for the chopping block. Arc is underperformed and super late to the party
    LMFAO

    What are you betting? =)
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    I'm suprised this didn't happen before, TBH. Given how their roadmaps have been continuously moving backwards, it's a tad impressive they held on for this long.

    Also, funny how Pat sounds a bit more down to earth now after boasting so much when he came along, lol. Still, the rumour mill says he's doing good things inside, so let's hope he'll get to laugh at the end. Just not too much, lel.

    Regards.
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    btmedic04 said:
    I'm willing to bet untel is seriously eyeing up its graphics division for the chopping block. Arc is underperformed and super late to the party
    A 500M$ loss on graphics is tiny compared to the billions of dollars Intel pumped into its wireless business and IA64 before giving up. I doubt anyone who's followed tech for the last 20 years had any expectations of Intel getting anywhere near par on its first generation of products attempting to break into a new market. New entrants practically always have to slog it out for 3-5 years before getting any brand recognition and traction assuming there are no show-stopping issues.

    From Intel's interview with GN, it sounds like Intel is committed to graphics at least until Drood, so we're likely at least another four years and couple of billion dollars away from Intel quitting graphics again if it doesn't work out.
    Reply
  • KyaraM
    InvalidError said:
    A 500M$ loss on graphics is tiny compared to the billions of dollars Intel pumped into its wireless business and IA64 before giving up. I doubt anyone who's followed tech for the last 20 years had any expectations of Intel getting anywhere near par on its first generation of products attempting to break into a new market. New entrants practically always have to slog it out for 3-5 years before getting any brand recognition and traction assuming there are no show-stopping issues.

    From Intel's interview with GN, it sounds like Intel is committed to graphics at least until Drood, so we're likely at least another four years and couple of billion dollars away from Intel quitting graphics again if it doesn't work out.
    Exactly this. Only morons would expect instant success, even if it is Intel. Just look at how long they dragged around other failed products, should give an indication of how long they are willing to try. Intel-GPUs won't go anywhere anytime soon. Besides, they aren't even that bad. At this point in time, the issue seem to be software, not hardware. The hardware looks great, I mean, it's developed by professionals from the field, and tests showed that with some rather easy and minor tuning (OC A380 testing), they are serious competition at a considerably lower price point especially in DX12 games (the GN interview stated a converted price of 125-135$ for the A3 380). Even the power consumption is set lower than the competition. The cards got potential, they just need to pull their heads out of their butts and get them out already.

    However...
    Drood
    Sorry for nitpicking, but it's Druid :)
    Reply