11-month old Russian outfit claims it has developed 16-core and 32-core chips, flaunts Cyrillic-badged processors — chips appear to be sanctions-swerving rebadged Chinese Loongson processors
Chinese Loongson 3C6000 CPUs now have heat spreaders with words in Cyrillic?
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Tramplin Electronics, a Russia-based microelectronics company, has announced that it has obtained what it claims to be the first samples of its Irtysh processors based on the LoongArch instruction set architecture (ISA) developed by Loongson, a Chinese CPU developer, reports Tramplin.Media. The processor features 16 or 32 cores, and their specifications and packaging match Loongson's LS3C6000 CPUs, so we most likely are looking at re-badged products from the Chinese company.
Tramplin Electronics claims that it has obtained its 16-core Irtysh C616 and 32-core Irtysh C632 processors for sovereign data centers and HPC applications. Notably, Russian firms cannot rely on industry-standard x86 CPUs from AMD and Intel because they are sanctioned by the US and cannot be legally obtained from nearby countries. You can see the Russian chips in the flesh by expanding the tweet below.
Сибирская компания Трамплин получила свои первые инженерные образцы процессоров Иртыш с системой команд и архитектурой ЛонгАрч, лицензированной у Китая и доработанной в РоссииС616 на 16 ядерС632 на 32 ядраЭто аналоги Intel Xeon Gold 6338 и AMD Zen 3#RuChip #InnoRu #PureRu pic.twitter.com/XhfYRRZe9NMarch 12, 2026
The company's product catalogue also includes the 64-core Irtysh C664. The CPUs are based on the LA664 microarchitecture that features a 6-way out-of-order execution and simultaneous multi-threading (SMT) technology, as well as support 128-bit vector processing extension instructions (LSX) and 256-bit advanced vector processing extension instructions (LASX) for the new CPUs. Loongson and its Russian ally Tramplin claim that LA664-based CPUs are competitive against AMD's Zen 3 and Intel's Ice Lake-based offerings.
Article continues belowAmong the advantages of the Irtysh processors, Vasily Vorobushkov, director of development at Tramplin Electronics, cited a proprietary boot environment, high energy efficiency, stable production, and uninterrupted supply. Development is said to be handled by the company's own team of engineers and designers, along with partner companies that build complete hardware-software solutions. The company is also said to operate its own design center focused on developing domestic IP blocks and maintains a broad ecosystem, though Vorobushkov did not elaborate on which blocks and elements of the ecosystem have been developed by Tramplin so far.
The specifications of Tramplin's 16-core Irtysh C616 (2.20 GHz, 32MB L3, quad-channel DDR4-3200 memory, 844.8 GFLOPS, 100W – 120W TDP) and 32-core Irtysh C632 processors (2.10 GHz, 64MB L3, octa-channel DDR4-3200 memory, 1612.8 GFLOPS, 180W – 200W TDP) are identical to those of Loongson's 16-core LS3C6000/S and 32-core LS3C6000/D CPUs down to a single number, which isn't something that happens usually unless we are dealing with the very same silicon.
Indeed, Tramplin Electronics was first registered on April 4, 2025, so the company is less than a year old. It is impossible to develop a processor from scratch (even based on a known/licensed ISA), find a production partner, build its physical design, tape it out, and get samples in this short of a time frame. In fact, a year is barely enough to bring up a new CPU based on an existing platform (this may easily take a couple of years for a company of AMD's or Intel's size), not to mention developing one from scratch. That said, even though the processors were made in the third week of 2026, it looks like these are regular Loongson LS3C6000 CPUs that carry Cyrillic inscriptions.
Now that Russia-based entities cannot legally obtain high-performance CPUs from companies like AMD or Intel, the only way for the country to retain access to more or less contemporary processors is to buy them illegally in nearby countries, or get Chinese processors from the People's Republic. Apparently, we are dealing with the second option here, albeit with an attempt to disguise Chinese processors as those developed in Russia. Interestingly, the source of the river Irtysh — after which the CPUs are named — is in China.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.
-
micheal_15 Russian "super processor" thats slower in actual performance than an Athlon 64 from 2003.Reply
Oh no wait they claim to be "competitive" and nearly the same speed as budget Ryzen 5000 from 2020
THEN we find out its just a re-badged chinese CPU from prior to 2020, designed for the lowest spec PC possible (i.e. runs basic sensors on industrial machinery) -
S58_is_the_goat Reply11-month old Russian outfit claims it has developed 16-core and 32-core chips
Developed, copied, rebranded... same thing comrades. -
CelicaGT I mean it says LL664 right on the heat spreader....Reply
https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/chinese-chipmaker-tapes-out-16-core-processor-64-core-coming-dragonchain-powered-loongson-ls3c6000-server-processor-set-to-rival-zen-3-based-cpus -
Notton You don't need a particularly complex CPU to run a missile or drone.Reply
Heck, the F-22 Raptor supposedly runs on an Intel i960.
What are they using these Longsoon CPUs for anyways? -
bit_user Reply
You do, if it has any kind of AI.Notton said:You don't need a particularly complex CPU to run a missile or drone.
Even older planes used even lower-spec avionics. I don't think that means there's nothing to gain from using higher speed processors.Notton said:Heck, the F-22 Raptor supposedly runs on an Intel i960. -
USAFRet Reply
The code, however....that is a whole different thing.Notton said:You don't need a particularly complex CPU to run a missile or drone.
Heck, the F-22 Raptor supposedly runs on an Intel i960.
And a fighter jet has multiple CPUs, each doing totally different things.
It does not all run from a single i960. -
hart832 I think the key factor is for the Russians to sample the LoongArch instruction sets & jointly develop the software & drivers for their needs. It saves alot of time trying to redevelop a totally new RISC chip from scratch. Having more developers will push the chip forward for broader usage & adoption. Meanwhile Loongson could focus on improving the chip architecture. While this chip may not be as great as western ones, it still will get the job done like output to printer or data storages with the right drivers. It's a whole lot better than having nothing since US made chips are sanctioned. This is the restart of the entire electronic architecture for the non-western markets. Big huge market that the west can't get.Reply -
usertests I've heard of several competing architectures coming from Chinese companies, including x86 derivative, ARM, RISC-V, LoongArch/MIPS, etc.Reply
Why choose this one for a PC/workstation and not one of the others? -
bit_user Reply
ARM is something they don't fully control. RISC-V leaves open the option of vendor-specific ISA extensions, but you're still dealing with a standard system architecture and basically anything custom you try and do there will be swimming upstream against what everyone else is doing (e.g. in the Linux kernel).usertests said:I've heard of several competing architectures coming from Chinese companies, including x86 derivative, ARM, RISC-V, LoongArch/MIPS, etc.
Why choose this one for a PC/workstation and not one of the others?
With LoongArch, Loongson managed to fork their own arch/ subtree from mips/. So, they now have dedicated hardware and arch-specific software support that they control. This gives them much more autonomy and flexibility.
Another thing about LoongArch is that Loongson can evolve the ISA with tricks to improve performance (and have already done so, relative to MIPS), which would not be possible if you wanted to break backward compatibility with some core aspect of RISC-V.
Finally, if Russia has some legacy MIPS stuff (I think they do?), then it should port more easily to LoongArch. At a system level, I've heard they're almost identical. The ISAs have diverged moreso, but there's still probably a lot of resemblance.