AMD drops an EPYC $15,000, 256-core beast — EPYC 9006 Zen 6 'Venice' CPUs get full spec and pricing treatment, from $700 up to $14,904

AMD EPYC 9006 (Venice) CPU with Zen 6 cores
(Image credit: AMD)

After unveiling the EPYC 9006 (codenamed Venice) series in July and previewing a few impressive Zen 6 benchmarks, AMD has now released full pricing for its highly anticipated next-generation server chips. According to the list StorageReview obtained, AMD has big plans for the data center, with a wide range of SKUs from eight to 256 cores and pricing from $700 to $14,904.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Zhiye Liu
News Editor, RAM Reviewer & SSD Technician

Zhiye Liu is a news editor, memory reviewer, and SSD tester at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.

  • Samlebon2306
    Wow, a 2P system with 2x256 cores with 1024 dancing threads will make Task Manager scream, "I need a 50" monitor to display that army of threads!"
    Reply
  • ejolson
    The article states "Additionally, the SP7 platform has a lower thermal footprint, as these Zen 6 parts carry TDP ratings between 130W and 400W."

    This should likely read SP8 instead of SP7.
    Reply
  • johnnycanadian
    Samlebon2306 said:
    Wow, a 2P system with 2x256 cores with 1024 dancing threads will make Task Manager scream, "I need a 50" monitor to display that army of threads!"
    Nobody is running Windows with that many cores. Or at least they shouldn't be.
    Reply
  • usertests
    Samlebon2306 said:
    Wow, a 2P system with 2x256 cores with 1024 dancing threads will make Task Manager scream, "I need a 50" monitor to display that army of threads!"
    I think Windows 11 has a 128c/256t limit, probably a lot more for Windows Server.

    Considering mainstream sockets will have 52 cores soon, they should probably raise the limits again.
    Reply
  • wussupi83
    Step 1.) hit lottery
    Step 2.) buy 512 zen 6 cores
    Step 3.) World domination?

    Nice to see the core count price scaling. Although a bit odd that SP7 is the dual CPU tier and SP8 is the single CPU tier. In my mind the higher number should = more CPU features. Or am I dyslexic?
    Reply
  • usertests
    wussupi83 said:
    Although a bit odd that SP7 is the dual CPU tier and SP8 is the single CPU tier. In my mind the higher number should = more CPU features. Or am I dyslexic?
    You don't have to beat yourself up over AMD's naming conventions. They are just confusing (but somehow better than some of the others, like Qualcomm).
    Reply
  • palladin9479
    johnnycanadian said:
    Nobody is running Windows with that many cores. Or at least they shouldn't be.
    But can it play Crysis.... err Cyberpunk 2077
    Reply
  • vinay2070
    A baseclock of 2.55GHz over 512 Threads is crazy.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    usertests said:
    I think Windows 11 has a 128c/256t limit, probably a lot more for Windows Server.
    Back in the 90's, I got a sweet deal on a quad-CPU Pentium Pro machine, from a liquidation sale. The problem was, Windows NT workstation was limited to just 2 CPUs. So, I had to borrow a license from work for NT Server (we had a Tech Net subscription and weren't using all of our licenses, so I claim it was just borrowing, not piracy), just to be able to use all of my CPUs.

    Then, I bought probably the last retail version of BeOS and it used all 4 CPUs out of the box. It was one of the most responsive computing experiences I'd had, up to that point!

    usertests said:
    Considering mainstream sockets will have 52 cores soon, they should probably raise the limits again.
    IMO, that's still going to be fairly niche. I think mainstream will bump up from ~16 threads to ~24 threads, but I don't foresee very wide adoption of the >= 48-thread tier.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    palladin9479 said:
    But can it play Crysis.... err Cyberpunk 2077
    It would be interesting to see what kind of software rendering performance it can deliver on something like Cyberpunk 2077. Each CPU will have up to 1.6 TB/s of memory bandwidth. 256 cores * ~32 SIMD pipes (if we're counting fp32) works out to something on the order of 8k "shaders". @ 2.55 GHz, you'd get on the order of 20 TFLOPS. That puts its raw compute power and memory bandwidth both firmly in the realm of dGPUs.
    Reply