Intel puts 1nm process (10A) on the roadmap for 2027 — also plans for fully AI-automated factories with 'Cobots'

Intel
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

We've already covered the first major announcements from the Intel Foundry Direct Connect event, but it turns out that Intel miscommunicated about a presentation that was thought to be under NDA — now Intel says the presentation is open to be reported to the public, so we have some more news to share: Intel's previously-unannounced Intel 10A (analogous to 1nm) will enter production/development in late 2027, marking the arrival of the company's first 1nm node, and its 14A (1.4nm) node will enter production in 2026.  [Edit: to be clear, this means 10A is beginning development, not entering high volume manufacturing, in 2027] The company is also working to create fully autonomous AI-powered fabs in the future.

Intel's Keyvan Esfarjani, the company's EVP and GM and Foundry Manufacturing and Supply, held a very insightful session that covered the company's latest developments and showed how the roadmap unfolds over the coming years. 

Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • 2Be_or_Not2Be
    Could this finally be Factorio in real life? :)
    Reply
  • btmedic04
    Wasn't Intel 4 (7nm) their first single digit process node?
    Reply
  • George³
    btmedic04 said:
    Wasn't Intel 4 (7nm) their first single digit process node?
    These are not actual nanometers, but trade names.
    Reply
  • usertests
    I want to see how 14A and 10A compare to the classic 14nm+++++++++. Transistor density scaling is worse than ever but you should still get what, 10x the transistors between "14nm" and "1.4nm"? Instead of the 64x if it was doubling per major node, 24x if it was +70%.

    14nm - 10nm - 7nm - 5nm - 3nm - 2nm - 1.4nm
    Reply
  • pointa2b
    Its nice to see Intel fighting to regain dominance. This is a win-win for the consumer, regardless of who you like.
    Reply
  • Giroro
    The 'A' in 10A does not refer to Angstroms. It doesn't refer to anything.,
    Reply
  • vijosef
    usertests said:
    I want to see how 14A and 10A compare to the classic 14nm+++++++++. Transistor density scaling is worse than ever but you should still get what, 10x the transistors between "14nm" and "1.4nm"? Instead of the 64x if it was doubling per major node, 24x if it was +70%.

    14nm - 10nm - 7nm - 5nm - 3nm - 2nm - 1.4nm
    If nm were physical distances,the scaling from 14nm to 1.4nm would be 100X

    (14/1.4)²=10²=100
    Reply
  • setx
    Giroro said:
    The 'A' in 10A does not refer to Angstroms. It doesn't refer to anything.,
    This.
    Like in "Intel 7" the '7' is not '7nm' it's just abstract 7 unrelated to anything.
    Reply
  • PlutoDelic
    It feels rather good to see that nobody trusts Intel's game on the names. This 1A will end up being 4nm.
    Reply
  • rtoaht
    setx said:
    This.
    Like in "Intel 7" the '7' is not '7nm' it's just abstract 7 unrelated to anything.
    Same for TSMC 7nm also known as N7. That 7 doesn’t represent any “real nanometers” or unit of any physical distance. It’s just a marketing name for the node from TSMC.
    Reply