Intel says it will launch new core with Nova Lake on desktop first, not in data center — VP Robert Hallock hopes enthusiasts ‘do the math’ compared to AMD

An Intel CPU sitting among other CPUs.
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Intel will launch its new core with Nova Lake on desktop first, not in the data center. Tom’s Hardware Premium recently sat down with Intel VP and general manager of the enthusiast channel business Robert Hallock and asked about his reaction to AMD launching Zen 6 first in the data center with new EPYC Venice CPUs — breaking with over a decade of AMD leading with a client release for its new architectures. Hallock opened up about Intel’s enthusiast roadmap and said the company is “very serious” about executing that roadmap.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Jake Roach
Senior Analyst, CPUs

Jake Roach is the Senior CPU Analyst at Tom’s Hardware, writing reviews, news, and features about the latest consumer and workstation processors.

  • jp7189
    2030 sounds like a good time to reevaluate Intel. If they have built a consistent track record of producing better products than AMD, and without pushing them so far they sacrifice reliability (I'm looking at you 13900k), then I might return to Intel on my personal computers.
    Reply
  • cvzalez
    jp7189 said:
    2030 sounds like a good time to reevaluate Intel. If they have built a consistent track record of producing better products than AMD, and without pushing them so far they sacrifice reliability (I'm looking at you 13900k), then I might return to Intel on my personal computers.
    In 2030 no one will use a desktop computer like we use today and for the desktops and even servers that will be used, probably x86 will be a niche legacy plataform with everything else being RiscV or Arm based.
    Reply
  • Paolooliva
    No one would be unhappy with a Nova desktop launch in 2026, but I would separate hope from reality. A Nova desktop launch would require motherboards with an LGA1954 socket — where are they? Especially considering the rumors of a CES 2027 presentation. Furthermore, to date it is still unclear whether Nova will be produced on 18A, N2P, or 18A-P, and with how many cores in the CPU tile. To me, "in 2026" seems more than optimistic, more like a mirage.


    In the end, let's be clear: Hallock's statement that "Nova desktop will come before Nova server" is one thing, and that is obviously plausible, since a CPU tile with X8P-X16E is certainly much less problematic to bring to market than a server CPU tile with X48/X64 P-cores. But Nova desktop coming before Zen 6 desktop is a completely different claim — and that is not what Hallock said.
    Reply
  • usertests
    Trying to persuade knuckle draggers to be mad at AMD for launching Zen 6 Epyc before Olympic Ridge.

    jp7189 said:
    2030 sounds like a good time to reevaluate Intel. If they have built a consistent track record of producing better products than AMD, and without pushing them so far they sacrifice reliability (I'm looking at you 13900k), then I might return to Intel on my personal computers.
    There isn't any reason to wait that long. You can just buy Nova Lake. Wait a year or two if you must for any Raptor Lake-esque problems to appear.

    But if you did wait that long, you could time it for a supposed transition away from E-cores and/or reintroduction of hyperthreading, possibly on the same LGA 1954 socket.

    cvzalez said:
    In 2030 no one will use a desktop computer like we use today and for the desktops and even servers that will be used, probably x86 will be a niche legacy plataform with everything else being RiscV or Arm based.
    Another "desktop/x86 is dead" take divorced from reality. It will remain in all segments.

    https://wccftech.com/amd-arm-eaten-intel-server-lead-yet-x86-is-poised-to-own-the-ai-cpu-wave-through-2030/
    Reply
  • Makaveli
    cvzalez said:
    In 2030 no one will use a desktop computer like we use today and for the desktops and even servers that will be used, probably x86 will be a niche legacy plataform with everything else being RiscV or Arm based.
    lmao
    Reply
  • Neilbob
    cvzalez said:
    In 2030 no one will use a desktop computer like we use today and for the desktops and even servers that will be used, probably x86 will be a niche legacy plataform with everything else being RiscV or Arm based.
    A very 2010-ish statement.

    You may be slightly overestimating the scale of possible changes that can occur in just three and a half years.
    Reply
  • Thunder64
    “Obviously I can’t go into what any of that is, but I am accelerating for the gaming market… we’re moving faster than we ever have in product, in release cadence.”

    If that promise is anything like 5N4Y it isn't worth anything.
    Reply
  • JayNor
    does the NVL-S integration of tb5, wifi7, bluetooth 6 attract gamers? I could see tb5 for external GPUs being a nice feature, if they get that all worked out.
    Reply
  • usertests
    JayNor said:
    does the NVL-S integration of tb5, wifi7, bluetooth 6 attract gamers? I could see tb5 for external GPUs being a nice feature, if they get that all worked out.
    I think eGPUs are a tiny and expensive meme market. Maybe a good idea if you assemble your own with a cheap adapter, but mostly something for TechTubers to hype up.

    I don't know the implications of integrating Wi-Fi/BT. Is it something OEMs care about?

    bLLC seems like the biggest feature for gamers. If it works properly, it should finally stop AMD from leading by 20-30% on 1080p gaming charts, a perennial embarrassment for Intel. It provides competition for X3D, which may keep AMD's prices in check. Nova Lake-S should also offer more than the 96 MiB L3 of 5800X3D through 9850X3D right out of the gate, which is exciting.
    Reply
  • dion_
    cvzalez said:
    In 2030 no one will use a desktop computer like we use today and for the desktops and even servers that will be used, probably x86 will be a niche legacy plataform with everything else being RiscV or Arm based.
    In 2030 everyone will use a desktop computer like we use today and for the desktops and even servers that will be used, probably RiscV and Arm will be niche platforms with everything else being x86 based.
    Reply