Microsoft introduces newest in-house AI chip — Maia 200 is faster than other bespoke Nvidia competitors, built on TSMC 3nm with 216GB of HBM3e

Microsoft's new Maia 200 AI data center GPU
(Image credit: Microsoft)

Microsoft has introduced its newest AI accelerator, the Microsoft Azure Maia 200. The new in-house AI chip is the next generation of Microsoft's Maia GPU line, a server chip designed for inferencing AI models with ludicrous speeds and feeds to outperform the custom offerings from hyperscaler competitors Amazon and Google.

Maia 200 is labelled Microsoft's "most efficient inference system" ever deployed, with all of its press releases splitting time between praising its big performance numbers and stressing Microsoft's lip service to environmentalism. Microsoft claims the Maia 200 gives 30% more performance per dollar than the first-gen Maia 100, an impressive feat considering the new chip also technically advertizes a 50% higher TDP than its predecessor.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Sunny Grimm
Contributing Writer

Sunny Grimm is a contributing writer for Tom's Hardware. He has been building and breaking computers since 2017, serving as the resident youngster at Tom's. From APUs to RGB, Sunny has a handle on all the latest tech news.

  • bit_user
    The article said:
    The new in-house AI chip is the next generation of Microsoft's Maia GPU line, a server chip designed for inferencing AI models with ludicrous speeds and feeds to outperform the custom offerings from hyperscaler competitors Amazon and Google.
    They don't use the term "GPU" anywhere on their site. No indication that it even has a GPU-like SIMD/SMT-oriented programming model, either.

    A lot of purpose-built AI accelerators are much more DSP-like, in their microarchitecture and programming model. I wouldn't toss around the term "GPU" to describe things that have neither any intrinsic graphics capabilities nor even (as far as we know) a GPU-like ISA.

    Some alternate nouns I use: "accelerator" and "processor". Use modifiers like "AI", "neural network", and "training"/"inference" as appropriate.

    P.S. Thanks for including the comparison table! I'd have liked to see a few more rows, such as transistor count and maybe SRAM, but I understand that takes some digging. I do think it probably deserves an asterisk that the Blackwell GPUs implement "NVFP4", which uses additional metadata and structure to squeeze more range & precision out of ~4-bit weights. The Microsoft link doesn't say there's anything special about their FP4 representation. Furthermore, I'm pretty sure that B300 Ultra uses two chips, FWIW. Doesn't make the comparison invalid, but does explain some of the disparities - especially when it's made on a larger node.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    BTW, if I understand correctly, the B300 Ultra is comprised of two GB110 chips, each with 51.2 MB of L2 cache. The each have 104B transistors, compared to Maia 200's 140B.

    Source:
    https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/nvidia-gb110.g1112
    Also, there seem to be rumors that this chip was co-designed with Marvell, but that Microsoft might be switching to Broadcom for future designs. No official word on any of that, as far as I could find.
    Reply