Qualcomm details Snapdragon C specs for $300 laptops for the first time — claims 67% faster performance on battery than Intel N250, AC performance remains a mystery (updated)
Devices coming from Acer, Asus, HP, Lenovo
This story was originally published on August 12. It was updated on August 13 at 3:03 PM ET with clarifications from Qualcomm regarding clock speeds across cores.
Qualcomm is getting into some of the nitty-gritty details of the Snapdragon C system-on-a-chip, the ARM-based platform it announced in June for laptops priced around $300.
The Snapdragon C is an 8-core Qualcomm Kryo CPU, with a single-core max frequency of 3 GHz and a multi-core max of 2 GHz. A Qualcomm spokesperson clarified that "Snapdragon C's 8 cores operate at different max frequencies to optimize for power [and] performance with 1 core at up to 3GHz, 3 at up to 2.6GHz, and the remaining 4 at up to 2GHz. The maximum sustained frequency across all cores is 2 GHz.."
It also has an integrated Adreno GPU with a max frequency of 900 MHz, and a Qualcomm Hexagon NPU, though Qualcomm hasn't listed how many TOPS it supports.
Qualcomm Snapdragon C |
Header Cell - Column 1 |
|---|---|
CPU |
8-core Qualcomm Kryo CPU |
Single-core max frequency |
3.0 GHz |
Multi-core max frequnecy |
2.0 GHz |
Total cache |
2 MB |
GPU |
Qualcomm Adreno GPU (integrated) |
NPU |
Qualcomm Hexagon, no TOPS metric specified |
Memory support |
Up to 16GB LPDDR5/5x or LPDDR4x |
Storage |
PCIe 3.0 NVMe, UFS 2.2/3.1 |
Wi-Fi |
Qualcomm FastConnect C6700 (up to Wi-Fi 6/6E) |
USB |
Up to USB 3.1, up to 2x USB-C, 2x USB-A |
Intel's Core 3 304, the weakest of its "Wildcat Lake" processors for budget systems, has a max performance core turbo frequency of 4.3 GHz and max low-power efficient core frequency of 3.3 GHz..
In updated slides, Qualcomm pits the Snapdragon C (in a reference design with 8GB of memory) against an Acer TravelMate with Intel's N250 and 8GB of RAM. The company claims you get 67% better battery performance than the Intel N250 and up to 2.1 times better battery efficiency, though that's measured with multi-threaded Cinebench. The company did not publish any benchmarks when the systems are plugged in.
Qualcomm claims that, on battery, the Snapdragon C is up to 44% faster in single-threaded Geekbench and 24% higher in multi-core. But its top victories were in Cinebench, running 50% faster single-threaded and 67% faster multi-threaded. But Geekbench and Speedometer 3.1 (+39%) are the real numbers to look at here, as they better showcase the type of work someone might typically do with a cheap notebook.
While Qualcomm is promising "all-day" battery life, it's leaving the number of hours up to its OEM partners. That's likely to vary depending on the display panels and other factors, but in Qualcomm's test reference device, it used a 16-inch screen. Qualcomm notes in its footnotes that the TravelMate has an 11.6-inch display, with "total power configured to match 16" screen."
Qualcomm instead is claiming battery power efficiency over the Intel N250 across all of its tests, from Netflix running in Microsoft Edge (106% better), web browsing (68% better), and a Teams video call (74% better).
Qualcomm is promising designs from HP, Acer, Asus, and Lenovo. At Computex, Acer showed a first look at the Aspire Go 15, its first notebook with Snapdragon C. We know that system has 8GB of RAM, 512GB of storage, and plenty of ports, but the company still has not unveiled a release date or pricing information.
It is possible that the timing of this launch will enable Qualcomm's OEM partners to unveil new systems at the IFA technology trade show in Berlin, unless they decide to wait until CES.
It's also unclear if the $300 guidance will hold, given the increase in cost of components — especially memory. But it's possible Snapdragon C laptops will significantly undercut the MacBook Neo and Windows laptops with Intel's Wildcat Lake. We'll have to test Snapdragon C to see how it performs.
You can see Qualcomm's full slide deck below:
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Andrew E. Freedman is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on laptops, desktops and gaming. He also keeps up with the latest news. A lover of all things gaming and tech, his previous work has shown up in Tom's Guide, Laptop Mag, Kotaku, PCMag and Complex, among others. Follow him on Threads @FreedmanAE and BlueSky @andrewfreedman.net. You can send him tips on Signal: andrewfreedman.01
-
hotaru251 ReplyThe company claims you get 67% better battery performance than the Intel N250 and up to 2.1 times better battery efficiency
....i sure hope so as you are running slower than the Intel n250.
snapdragon's single core 3ghz and multi 2 ghz..and these are MAX speeds...
meanwhile N250 singlecore can boost to 3.8 -
usertests Reply
That's an 8c/8t compared to a 4c/4t. Qualcomm can massage the numbers to get the result they want.hotaru251 said:....i sure hope so as you are running slower than the Intel n250.
snapdragon's single core 3ghz and multi 2 ghz..and these are MAX speeds...
meanwhile N250 singlecore can boost to 3.8
Should be noted that's a half disabled Alder Lake-N die. But I guess they are comparing to it since it's probably sold at similar prices. -
User of Computers Reply
Would've been nice to see some low-end WCL comparisons (a la Core 3 304), I suspect it would be a much closer race.Admin said:Qualcomm has detailed the specs for its Snapdragon C processor, with 8 cores and claimed "all-day" battery life.
Qualcomm details Snapdragon C specs for $300 laptops for the first time — claims 67% faster performance on battery than Intel N250, AC performance... : Read more -
usertests Reply
The comparison they are doing here might be fair if Snap-C laptops are actually priced like N250 laptops. Whereas most WCL 304 laptops are going to be $500+ AFAIK. Chuwi starts at $450 but their brand reputation is in the dumpster.User of Computers said:Would've been nice to see some low-end WCL comparisons (a la Core 3 304), I suspect it would be a much closer race.
Here's a dismal N250 laptop with 4 GB of RAM for $229 on sale, $300 regularly: https://www.walmart.com/ip/HP-15-6-N250-4-128-Blue/18638703162 -
User of Computers Reply
This makes sense. However, within the next couple of years I expect to see these lower end WCL SKUs make their way into superbudget laptops like these. This segment is clearly one that is slow to adopt new technology (you can still find N4020 laptops brand new!), especially with DRAM prices being what they are.usertests said:The comparison they are doing here might be fair if Snap-C laptops are actually priced like N250 laptops. Whereas most WCL 304 laptops are going to be $500+ AFAIK. Chuwi starts at $450 but their brand reputation is in the dumpster.
On an aside, WCL's adoption is probably being held back by its DDR5 requirements lol... these laptops are all 4GB of LPDDR4. -
usertests Reply
I agree with all of that.User of Computers said:This makes sense. However, within the next couple of years I expect to see these lower end WCL SKUs make their way into superbudget laptops like these. This segment is clearly one that is slow to adopt new technology (you can still find N4020 laptops brand new!), especially with DRAM prices being what they are.
On an aside, WCL's adoption is probably being held back by its DDR5 requirements lol... these laptops are all 4GB of LPDDR4.
Minisforum just launched a barebones 304 box at $263 early bird ($329 regular). Want 16 GB DDR5 and 500 GB SSD with that? That will be $559.
I hope we see more adoption of the SKUs with 2 P-cores and 2 Xe3 cores (graphics doubled!). So many 8-core ADL-N dies were disabled into 4-cores, and we could be seeing something similar with the Core 3 304.
Wildcat Lake Refresh supposedly coming to add another 2 P-cores gives me some hope that a majority of these devices will end up with more than the single consumer SKU with one lonely Xe3 core (the 305 has 2 P-cores, also only 1 Xe3, and no NPU, but appears intended for the embedded market). -
pug_s $300 is a good price, but compared to low end n250 is not much to compare to. Plus there are no application compability issues with the n250. Maybe you can use this for a NAS?Reply -
Vicecrow Will be great a ARM cpu with 4gigs of ram running microslop windows. Will run like the first asus netbookReply -
usertests ReplyVicecrow said:Will be great a ARM cpu with 4gigs of ram running microslop windows. Will run like the first asus netbookIn updated slides, Qualcomm pits the Snapdragon C (in a reference design with 8GB of memory) against an Acer TravelMate with Intel's N250 and 8GB of RAM.
At Computex, Acer showed a first look at the Aspire Go 15, its first notebook with Snapdragon C. We know that system has 8GB of RAM, 512GB of storage, and plenty of ports, but the company still has not unveiled a release date or pricing information.
I think it's unlikely we'll see any models with less than 8 GB. They can also use LPDDR4X according to the specs table, which may be a little cheaper.
Also going by the specs table, you will never see one with more than 16 GB.