China's top DRAM maker CXMT sues Pentagon over its blacklisting — argues chips are standard civilian JEDEC spec, not defense hardware

CXMT headquarters
(Image credit: CXMT)

China's leading DRAM producer ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT) has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Defense in an attempt to overturn its classification as a company linked to China's military, Reuters reports. CXMT claims that it has no connection to the Chinese People's Liberation Army, and argues that the Pentagon's decision lacks supporting evidence, violated due-process requirements, and has damaged both its business and reputation.

The Pentagon initially classified CXMT as a Chinese military company in January 2025, when Joe Biden was the president. The Trump administration subsequently maintained the designation when the Defense Department updated the list in June. CXMT says it spent more than a year supplying information to the Defense Department in an attempt to overturn the classification and remove itself from the list.

The company claims the DoD published a notice in February indicating that CXMT would be taken off the list but withdrew that notice later the same day without any explanation. In June, the Pentagon classified CXMT as 'directly affiliated with MIIT and indirectly affiliated with SASAC and MIIT.' MIIT is China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, whereas SASAC is the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council, an organization that formally owns the government's stakes in non-financial state-owned enterprises.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware

While CXMT memory can certainly be found in systems used by the PLA or China's secret services, this does not automatically make CXMT a direct supplier to these entities and therefore does not prove that CXMT is a Chinese military company.

CXMT points out the Pentagon's original motivation to include the DRAM maker in its list was a remarkably weak-looking 'military grade' argument. According to the complaint, DoD's 2024 report said CXMT contributed to China's defense industrial base partly because its DRAM is dual-use and cited an advertisement describing CXMT products as 'military grade.' CXMT says that advertisement came from an unauthorized distributor, which later admitted the characterization was erroneous.

In addition, CXMT claims that its DRAM products conform to JEDEC commercial standards and lack the requirements imposed on Chinese military-grade semiconductor components involving areas such as temperature, packaging, testing, and military oversight. Also, it says that should its products be made in the U.S., they would be classified as for 'purely civilian uses' and that it 'does not hold any licenses to manufacture products for military use.'

Inclusion on the Pentagon's list of companies linked to the Chinese military can result in restrictions involving U.S. government contracts, something that CXMT barely seeks. But more importantly, it can affect a company's commercial relationships (as many companies do not want to be affiliated with companies linked to the Chinese military) and reputation. Indeed, CXMT claims that since January 2025 the designation has continuously hurt it commercially and reputationally, and that the lawsuit is intended to protect its business interests.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

TOPICS
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • alrighty_then
    The real problem from the US perspective if you could tear the chip apart and prove it's fine today, but next month's batch may not be, and you're not going to inspect chips in every batch... So not worth the risk, just like China not wanting to use Windows or Nvidia.
    Reply
  • cvzalez
    alrighty_then said:
    The real problem from the US perspective if you could tear the chip apart and prove it's fine today, but next month's batch may not be, and you're not going to inspect chips in every batch... So not worth the risk, just like China not wanting to use Windows or Nvidia.
    The only problem with the USA is China is way competitive than any country and they don't sell their country!
    Reply
  • Zyl
    alrighty_then said:
    The real problem from the US perspective if you could tear the chip apart and prove it's fine today, but next month's batch may not be, and you're not going to inspect chips in every batch... So not worth the risk, just like China not wanting to use Windows or Nvidia.
    Not at all. It is purely and entirely economic.
    CXMT are entirely economically driven. More than that all other RAM brands are foreign sourced, some even sourced from china (not PRC but still china). They are trying to block mainland China RAM from becoming mainstream, that is it. Purely economic strategy and you have to be impinged in your brain function to think otherwise. The other sources of RAM could already change the chips in any batch. Simple as that.
    Also that risk is entirely military and will not affect consumers, Therefore should not be blocked for most people. Also also also, It is basically a zero risk product anyway because there is effectively no way for it to exfiltrate data to begin with.
    Reply
  • COLGeek
    Almost rhetorical questions, but here goes.

    What do you think happens at the first whiff of "malicious memory" from a market/consumer perspective?

    What would be gained (and lost), especially for a new manufacturer trying to break into a global market?

    I get some of the skepticism, but if you look inside all your tech, you'll find any number of components that (many) originated from China. Just adding for a bit of perspective and objectivity.
    Reply
  • daworstplaya
    Isn't this the same company that allegedly stole all it's RAM manufacturing tech from Samsung?
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    daworstplaya said:
    Isn't this the same company that allegedly stole all it's RAM manufacturing tech from Samsung?
    this is the actual reason I figure US will fall back to for banning em.
    It is clear cut and is more likely to be fair in a courts eyes.

    DRAM is volatile, anything put into it wouldnt survive after being shipped overseas.

    "if" you would attach an extra non-volatile part....it would liekly be caught via QC from the ones who will use it (i.e. your dell, lenovo, hp, etc)...and not like china actually cares about the rando americans data to risk getting caught doing it. (or require companies using it list it on stuff using it or be fined)

    Just ban US agencies from using devices with it in if you are worried about national security.
    Reply
  • Bigshrimp
    I knew this would happen regarding being banned. There goes any hope of cheaper memory in the PC market. :(
    Reply
  • call101010
    daworstplaya said:
    Isn't this the same company that allegedly stole all it's RAM manufacturing tech from Samsung?
    UNrcUf9JaMc
    Reply
  • palladin9479
    hotaru251 said:
    Just ban US agencies from using devices with it in if you are worried about national security.
    That is precisely what they are doing. USG maintains a list of excluded manufacturers that it will neither buy products from or buy products containing that excluded product. This doesn't prohibit the product from being sold on the private market.

    Many large companies want to sell to the USG and therefore distance themselves from anything on the restricted list. Rather than maintaining separate production lines, they just don't purchase any of those components in the first place.
    Reply
  • Edward Jazzhands
    alrighty_then said:
    The real problem from the US perspective if you could tear the chip apart and prove it's fine today, but next month's batch may not be, and you're not going to inspect chips in every batch... So not worth the risk, just like China not wanting to use Windows or Nvidia.
    This is blatant misinformation. Amazing nobody else here corrected this nonsense.

    Windows is software. It is fundamentally different from hardware. China does not want windows running on all their state and military computers specifically because it is software. I do not need to explain that Windows is filled with things that track you and is very weak on privacy. You are trying to claim this is an identical problem to hardware security concerns as if CXMT could slip in some tracking and some backdoors into their RAM sticks without any OEMs noticing like HP, Lenovo, Samsung, and Asus. This is bullshit.

    On the Nvidia side, China's ban of Nvidia has literally nothing to do with thinking they could implement backdoors and tracking. China wants to develop their own domestic GPU industry. After the USA banned exports of Nvidia chips they decided they need their own domestic industry to never be reliant on exports from the USA. That's it. That's completely unrelated to any notion of tracking or backdoors. "Security" in that context means economic security of having domestic industry. It has nothing to do with what your original response is insinuating.
    Reply