SK Hynix says 2027 will be the 'worst year' for memory shortage, forecasts crunch to last until 2030 — CEO shares grim outlook on the day SK Hynix gets listed on Nasdaq

SK Hynix HBM chip
(Image credit: Getty Images)

SK Hynix CEO Kwak Noh-jung says that 2027 will be the "worst year" for the ongoing memory shortage in comments shared with Reuters. The remark comes on the heels of SK Hynix successfully marking the largest-ever IPO for a foreign company on the U.S. stock market, raising $26.5 billion. Although Kwak points to next year being the worst for RAM shortages, the executive expects the memory crunch to last until 2030.

"We forecast that next year will be the worst year in the industry's history from the supply perspective," Kwan told Reuters. "We still forecast that customer demand will remain higher than our ​supply capacity even beyond 2030. But we are doing our best to solve the problem."

In March, SK Group chairman Chey Tae-won also suggested shortages would last until 2030, and the company has previously pointed to 2027 as a key shortage point, alongside Samsung. DRAM demand is largely driven by the HBM used in AI accelerators, which require far more sophisticated manufacturing and packaging processes compared to consumer DDR5. On top of advanced manufacturing, HBM also consumes more wafer capacity than DDR5, forcing major memory brands to reallocate supply and double down on an already sticky supply situation.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware

Forecasts like this are tricky. It's in SK Hynix's financial interest for memory shortages to continue, even well beyond 2030. SK Hynix has set a record for quarter-over-quarter revenue, and rival Micron has seen its stock value increase 213% this year, pushing its share price to around $990.

However, Kwan's remarks aren't just a bid to rally behind SK Hynix stock. Over the past few months, we've seen Micron and SK Hynix ink long-term supply agreements (LTAs). These agreements commit supply over multiple years to particular companies and define a price floor and ceiling during the agreement term. Although LTAs don't directly influence market prices, they secure demand, and we've seen a lot of LTAs over the past several months to bind DRAM supply.

Although memory (and NAND) prices will remain elevated for at least the next several months, we've seen some signs of the market cooling. Earlier this month, a TrendForce report showed DRAM contract prices up 15% to 18% quarter over quarter for Q3 2026. That's a large increase, but far lower than the QoQ increases we've seen previously.

We're nearing some semblance of stability in the memory market, just stability at vastly elevated prices. How long that lasts is anyone's guess. Although memory brands like SK Hynix have visibility into market trends, those can rapidly change. Just this year, we've seen a massive pivot toward AI spending going toward CPUs, pushing Intel's stock to record highs while shedding around $1 trillion in Nvidia's market cap; a year ago, that would've been almost impossible to predict.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Jake Roach
Senior Analyst, CPUs

Jake Roach is the Senior CPU Analyst at Tom’s Hardware, writing reviews, news, and features about the latest consumer and workstation processors.

  • usertests
    If the bubble pops, these predictions could become obsolete instantly. On the other hand, maybe the bubble doesn't pop, the Iran war continues to disrupt supply chains, and China invades Taiwan.

    I picked up another used 64 GB DDR4 under $200 just in case. May you live in an exciting 2027.
    Reply
  • pug_s
    Memory always go on boom and bust cycles for the last 2 decades and it is not stopping soon. Maybe there will be an AI bust and prices would drop and SK Hynix will bear the brunt of it.
    Reply
  • JayGau
    pug_s said:
    Memory always go on boom and bust cycles for the last 2 decades and it is not stopping soon.
    This is not just the result of regular offer and demand boom and bust cycles. It is one the worst computer-component related crysis the world ever faced. And we haven't seen the worst yet. Consumer products like laptops, phones and even cars are still running on old RAM and drive supplies. When manufacturers will have to refill their stock with the current prices it's going to be ugly, if they even manage to refill at all. We need to take into account that this price hike situation started only a few months ago and it wasn't that bad at the beginning.

    At work we have been trying to buy a few dozens of enterprise-grade drives for months without success. Out of stock everywhere (and if a site says it's in stock, once you contact them they say it will take several months before they can start shipping anything). I've never seen a situation like this. Even during the covid crysis it was not that bad.
    Reply
  • drea.drechsler
    This isn't too much dis-similar to the predictions I've read being made by Samsung and Micron. I would suppose it's being made with the nature of their short and long-term contracts in mind and therefore made rationally. Especially so considering they have a fiduciary responsibility to their shareholders for rational forecasts.

    But what If the Chinese memory mfr's continue to improve throughout this period and actually become entrenched with fully competitive products? Might CPU mfr's, including AMD and Intel, even have to start optimizing IMC designs around their memory so they can sell their product? I wonder if they (Hynix/Samsung/Micron) will ever recover their market share(s) in consumer & gaming PC market when the bubble does subside. It may be a last hurrah for them.
    Reply
  • Gururu
    IPO 101 IMO. What better way to sell your product than to tell the world the supply<<<<demand.
    Reply
  • drea.drechsler
    Gururu said:
    IPO 101 IMO. What better way to sell your product than to tell the world the supply<<<<demand.
    One better way is to make sure supply actually IS <<<< demand. Like the Hunts did when they cornered the silver market in the 70's.
    Reply
  • anemusek
    Admin said:
    SK Hynix CEO Kwak Noh-jung says the memory shortage will get even worse in 2027, and claiming the RAM crunch will last at least until the turn of the decade.

    SK Hynix says 2027 will be the 'worst year' for memory shortage, forecasts crunch to last until 2030 — CEO shares grim outlook on the day SK Hynix... : Read more
    Yes, and that's why they took out a high-interest loan on the New York Stock Exchange, i.e. sold ADRs worth over 20 billion...
    Reply
  • F1appassionato
    The memory cartel knew this tidal wave of consumption was coming ~5 years ago. That is when they started developing and solidifying their expansion plans. Micron announced their NY fabs in 2022 IIRC and they just poured concrete this week, 3-6 months ahead of schedule. They are aiming for the first fab to be operational by H1 2030, but I honestly think they're going to pull out all of the stops to move that forward in 2029... if they can secure the fab equipment they need.

    This isn't just about AI, this is about everything that uses memory. Just look at Tesla's AI4 vs AI5 AutoPilot hardware. AI4 was 32GB RAM and 256GB storage. AI5 is 192GB RAM and I'm willing to bet storage doubled at minimum. I'd imagine that Waymo uses even more memory as they have a far more comprehensive sensor suite.

    To run on-device AI, every cell phone in the coming years is going to have at minium 16GB memory. The PC industry is going to move towards all unified memory, probably 64GB minimum even on entry level personal laptops / PCs in 2-3 years.

    We are living in a compute limited world for at least the next 5years. Not just memory but practically every modern semi-conductor is in short supply, which is why you see old CPUs on older manufacturing nodes re-entering production. When it takes 3-5 years to plan, build and equip a fab, this is the only stop gap measure you can take to get product to market to fill demand.

    I'm not so sure CXMT going mainstream would help. I think they're just going to occupy the bottom of the market for the most severely budget constrainted consumer products. Do they even have the ability to meet Nvidia's qualification standards? Samsung's HBM didn't for a long time.

    Then there is also whether China invades Taiwan. I believe they will try something in mid-2027. No you have to take 80% of leading edge semi manufacturing capacity off the table. Even with advanced nodes operating in SK, EU and USA, there is nowhere near enough advanced packaging capacity in those countries... I do think South Korea comes out the winner in any Taiwan conflict.
    Reply
  • usertests
    anemusek said:
    Yes, and that's why they took out a high-interest loan on the New York Stock Exchange, i.e. sold ADRs worth over 20 billion...
    Devil's advocate: they need cash ASAP to expand production, and they truly believe what they are saying about shortages lasting years.

    At the very least, they have a potentially short time window to make massive profits, and if they are late they miss out on some of it.
    Reply
  • vanadiel007
    This is what happens when we ship the manufacturing of technology to market's outside of Europe and North America for increased profit margins.
    We learned nothing from Covid, where it was clear that we were unable to manufacture critical components ourselves and relied heavily on foreign manufacturing to meet our needs.

    7 years later and we have the same happening to computer components, because Companies like Intel, Apple, Google have their products assembled offshore using mostly offshore manufacturing facilities and "parts". So does the car industry and so do many others.

    In the end we pay premium prices for those decisions while they collect the extra profit for themselves and their shareholders.
    Reply