DLSS 5 has already been ported to work on RTX 4000 Series graphics cards — incompatible CUDA instructions get patched to work on previous-gen hardware

Control Running DLSS 5 on RTX 4080 Super
(Image credit: Remedy Entertainment / Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware has verified that modders have managed to get DLSS 5 up and running on RTX 4000 series graphics cards, following the leaked release of the DLSS 5 nvngx_dlssnr.dll yesterday, which saw modders flock to integrate it into other titles outside of Remedy Entertainment's Control.

Yesterday, modders managed to get Nvidia's DLSS 5 running inside Control, and now in other titles. The early access version of NBA 2K27 contained a new file enabling the Neural Rendering technique, and has since been ported to other games.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Sayem Ahmed
Subscription Editor

Sayem Ahmed is the Subscription Editor at Tom's Hardware. He covers a broad range of deep dives into hardware, both new and old, including the CPUs, GPUs, and everything else that uses a semiconductor. He has worked as a professional tech journalist since 2015 and has written for Gamespot, IGN, and Dexerto.

  • thisisaname
    Just because it can be made to run on a RTX 4000 does not mean Nvidia will make any effort to support it on a TRX 4000 GPU.
    Reply
  • Zak707
    thisisaname said:
    Just because it can be made to run on a RTX 4000 does not mean Nvidia will make any effort to support it on a TRX 4000 GPU.
    Exactly because that would go counter to their engineered obsolescence.
    Reply
  • Bigshrimp
    This will never officially be supported by Nvidia on the RTX 4000 series. All you have to do is look back at the history of previous new tech releases from them and the answer is pretty clear.
    Reply
  • Trake_17
    And yet everyone just keeps spending gobs and gobs for their product, preferring them over competitors. What do you suppose that tells them about their business practices? Validate them, perhaps?
    Reply
  • jackt
    What do you mean ?
    Do it works offline ?
    Reply