Intel launches $299 Arc Pro B50 with 16GB of memory, 'Project Battlematrix' workstations with 24GB Arc Pro B60 GPUs

Arc Pro
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Intel has announced its Arc Pro B-series of graphics cards at Computex 2025 in Taipei, Taiwan, with a heavy focus on AI workstation inference performance boosted by segment-leading amounts of VRAM. The Intel Arc Pro B50, a compact card that's designed for graphics workstations, has 16GB of VRAM and will retail for $299, while the larger Intel Arc Pro B60 for AI inference workstations slots in with a copious 24GB of VRAM. While the B60 is designed for powerful 'Project Battlematrix' AI workstations sold as full systems ranging from $5,000 to $10,000, it will carry a roughly $500 per-unit price tag. 

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • usertests
    The B50 is certainly worth a look for SFF, if you can take dual-slot.
    Reply
  • Mindstab Thrull
    IF it ends up being a good AI GPU, you could fit four in a typical PC chassis as long as your motherboard has sufficient slots. Four PCIE slots means 96GB VRAM which is a lot for handling AI on a home server and only be about $2000 for GPU's. Sounds like fun!

    ... Calling Wendell at Level1Techs? :)
    Reply
  • jlake3
    baboma said:
    Good to see Intel taking the lead on dedicated AI GPUs for the consumer market. Pricing is pretty amazing. Hope to see more coverage of these once they come to market.
    With all due respect, I’m not sure how this is consumer, AI-dedicated, or leading?
    B50/B60 are explicitly part of the workstation line up, and run professional drivers
    The standard display pipelines are enabled, and they’re equipped with the normal amount of outputs
    2025Q3, with “full enablement” in Q4 is hardly first to the party when it comes to using workstation GPUs for AITwo B60s on one PCB is a neat twist that was only being done in rack mount servers and not tower workstations, but if one B60 costs $500 I’d expect the dual version to cost 2x plus a premium for complexity and density.
    Reply
  • cyrusfox
    Deleted member 2824971 said:
    I predict a future as bright and long as Xeon Phi, only much accelerated.

    This tastes much more like a desperate attempt to moderate the fall of stock prices than honest delusions, of which Intel had aplenty.

    Not even the best and greatest single shot product really has much of a chance in that market. Unless the vast majority of potential buyers truly believe that you have a convincing multi-generation roadmap which you'll be able to execute, nobody is going to invest much thought, let alone commit budgets and people in that direction, just look at how hard it is already for AMD.

    And they have a little more to offer than one entrly level GPU chip that fails to sell even with a high-price competition.
    Disagree here, there is certain workloads (LLM) which are memory hungry (higher precision models) and the battlemage architecture supplies sufficient throughput to make this a viable product especially in the price range these are marketed at ($300 for a B50). The B580 is capable of 30 tokens per second, compare that to Chatgpt, which charges ~1$ per million tokens, a B580 would produce 30*3600*24=2.5 million tokens a day, so equivalent of ~$2.50. Roughly pay for itself in ~100 days, payoff slower if electricity cost is factored in. This has a lot of parallels to crypto workloads.

    These professional cards come with more vram by default and the B50 should be capable of 24 tokens/s, B60 same as the b580, and the dual version double that (it scales quite well as long as bandwidth between units is high).

    No one else is offering this much memory bandwidth at this price, intel is serving an unfulfilled market and these should be as hard to find as a b580- due to the lack of competition. While it won't game as well b570 or b580 especially, but for these will perform exceptionally well for professional workloads as long as you don't need CUDA. As these are 1/4 or less the price of the competing RTX pro, these should do quite well.
    Reply
  • User of Computers
    cyrusfox said:
    Disagree here, there is certain workloads (LLM) which are memory hungry (higher precision models) and the battlemage architecture supplies sufficient throughput to make this a viable product especially in the price range these are marketed at ($300 for a B50). The B580 is capable of 30 tokens per second, compare that to Chatgpt, which charges ~1$ per million tokens, a B580 would produce 30*3600*24=2.5 million tokens a day, so equivalent of ~$2.50. Roughly pay for itself in ~100 days, payoff slower if electricity cost is factored in. This has a lot of parallels to crypto workloads.

    These professional cards come with more vram by default and the B50 should be capable of 24 tokens/s, B60 same as the b580, and the dual version double that (it scales quite well as long as bandwidth between units is high).

    No one else is offering this much memory bandwidth at this price, intel is serving an unfulfilled market and these should be as hard to find as a b580- due to the lack of competition. While it won't game as well b570 or b580 especially, but for these will perform exceptionally well for professional workloads as long as you don't need CUDA. As these are 1/4 or less the price of the competing RTX pro, these should do quite well.
    I agree here
    Reply
  • User of Computers
    Deleted member 2824971 said:
    This tastes much more like a desperate attempt to moderate the fall of stock prices than honest delusions, of which Intel had aplenty.
    They have the silicon. Why not put in the software work and take a piece of a much bigger pie than the consumer low-end would ever offer?
    Reply
  • thestryker
    jlake3 said:
    Two B60s on one PCB is a neat twist that was only being done in rack mount servers and not tower workstations, but if one B60 costs $500 I’d expect the dual version to cost 2x plus a premium for complexity and density.
    Given that it's a PCIe 5.0 x8 GPU which doesn't need a ton of power I'm guessing the only thing they share is power delivery, display output routing and cooling. That shouldn't particularly add much of anything to the cost of manufacture so I'd bet any premium would be based on market demand.
    Reply
  • User of Computers
    thestryker said:
    Given that it's a PCIe 5.0 x8 GPU which doesn't need a ton of power I'm guessing the only thing they share is power delivery, display output routing and cooling. That shouldn't particularly add much of anything to the cost of manufacture so I'd bet any premium would be based on market demand.
    They do not share power delivery.
    edit- the gamers nexus video shows that they're essentially 2 full graphics cards (GPU, mem, PD and such) put onto the same PCB
    Reply
  • thestryker
    User of Computers said:
    They do not share power delivery.
    edit- the gamers nexus video shows that they're essentially 2 full graphics cards (GPU, mem, PD and such) put onto the same PCB
    There's a single power connector which means they share power delivery even if each GPU has its own VRM setup.
    Reply
  • JRStern
    baboma said:
    How vLLM Addresses This Challenge
    "vLLM"
    ?
    Reply