It's been a wild few days for gamers, as a version of the DLSS 5 model leaked with NBA2K27 and promptly got modded into every game under the sun. After initial builds that relied on ReShade to make the model work, the community has since wrapped up DLSS 5 into an Optiscaler package that makes adding it to most games nearly painless. With that development, we wanted to get a sense of how the tech performs ahead of its official release.
We're not going to weigh in on the aesthetic or philosophical implications of applying DLSS 5 to a particular title here. That ground has been extremely well trodden already, and if you haven't been stuck under a rock this past week or so, you've likely seen what DLSS 5 can do for yourself.
We're more interested in getting an idea of the performance cost of getting DLSS 5 running, along with the power requirements it incurs. Whether you love or hate this model's effect on a game's appearance, you can weigh your feelings against the performance cost involved in getting there.
Before we get to the numbers, some caveats: the Optiscaler DLSS 5 injection method may not represent the behavior of this model when developers integrate it through Nvidia's Streamline framework. Streamline may offer less overhead and better performance than what we saw here.
But Nvidia's technical paper on DLSS 5 says that the model takes 8 ms to execute on a 4K frame, and that's essentially identical to the performance metrics that we saw from Optiscaler when it's running. So it seems unlikely that the official version will be far off the performance we measured if it's implemented in these titles using the proper channels.
For these limited tests, we chose to focus on the RTX 5090 Founders Edition's behavior under DLSS 5 to explore the largest performance drop one might expect from this community implementation of the tech.
Out of curiosity, we also grabbed MSI's RTX 5090 Lightning Z from the TH arsenal. This RTX 5090 has a unique two-12V-2x6 connector power setup and a 1000W power limit available through its Extreme vBIOS. Given the apparent arithmetic intensity of DLSS 5, we wanted to see whether running it would consume any of the extra available power headroom from that card's twin-plug design.
For our small sample of games, we used the following basic settings: a 4K output resolution target fed by DLSS Performance upscaling (i.e., a 1920x1080 input) without frame generation, as well as maximum raster and ray-tracing quality settings (or path tracing, in the case of Cyberpunk 2077) and DLSS Ray Reconstruction where it was available.
We didn't use Multi Frame Generation in these tests. We want to cleanly represent the performance baseline you can expect from DLSS 5 given the above constraints.
Cyberpunk 2077 performance
We started our performance explorations with Cyberpunk 2077. Optiscaler was an easy install for this game, and we confirmed that neural rendering was making the expected difference in facial detail and lighting realism when we activated it.
In exchange for those enhancements, the RTX 5090 Founders Edition takes a 42% hit from DLSS 5. Although the Lightning Z takes a slightly smaller 39% hit, its baseline performance is higher than the Founders Edition, so the MSI card maintains a 60 FPS average and much higher 1% lows than the single-connector card. That difference in smoothness is evident.
Part of that difference in performance comes down to power. As we noted, the RTX 5090 Lightning Z has a much larger 1000W power limit to play with, and it puts that headroom to use here.
The jump in power consumption from DLSS 5 on the Lightning Z is eye-popping: 580 W to 723 W, or a 25% increase. The RTX 5090 Founders Edition only goes from 482 W to 551 W, which means that it's practically power-limited.
Hogwarts Legacy performance
Unlike Cyberpunk 2077, Hogwarts Legacy doesn't implement path tracing, but its extensive RT effects are still impressive. Importantly for our purposes, it's easy to get Optiscaler into this title.
Hogwarts exhibits the largest performance drop of these three games on the RTX 5090 FE, at 49%. The Lightning Z card drops just 42%, though, and its higher baseline performance makes for a smoother experience.
The Lightning Z once again illustrates just how much power DLSS 5 can pull if it's available, even in this "lighter" RT title. Without DLSS 5, the MSI card draws 480 W on average. With neural rendering enabled, it pulls 720 W, or a whopping 50% more power.
Control performance
Finally, we tried the game that started the community DLSS 5 wave last week: 2019's Control. This early RT title still poses a stiff challenge for modern hardware if you crank its RT settings to the absolute max, as we did here.
The RTX 5090 Founders Edition takes another 42% hit to performance under these conditions, and the Lightning Z also drops 42%. But the higher power limits of the MSI card let it deliver 20% higher average frame rates and much higher 1% lows than the Founders Edition, and that's a smoothness boost you can really feel.
That extra performance does come at the expense of significantly higher power draw. The Lightning Z is already pulling a shocking 691 W without DLSS 5, but enable neural rendering, and it jumps to 802 W. The Founders Edition just runs into its 575 W power limit again.
Bottom Line
At least in our experience with the community-made mod packages available so far, DLSS 5 has a large performance cost, similar to what we saw with ray tracing before the wide availability of DLSS: in the range of 39% to 49%, according to our small sample of results so far.
Official versions of DLSS 5 may perform better, but we won't know for sure until later this week. In any event, our observations of the behavior of the tech as implemented by the community match up with Nvidia's published guidance so far.
We don't expect vastly different or better performance from first-party implementations, although a developer's official DLSS 5 recipe could certainly look better in a given title than the current free-for-all with sliders that were never meant to be exposed to end users. We'll have to see what happens as developers take the time to tune DLSS 5 for their games as the tech makes its way into more titles through official channels.
Officially, DLSS 5 only supports RTX 50-series graphics cards, and if you're interested in running it with RT or PT, our results show that you're likely going to need to enable the full stack of Nvidia software tech available from Blackwell: DLSS Performance or Ultra Performance to achieve solid baseline frame rates, plus Multi Frame Generation for acceptable output fluidity.
Some have suggested that you don't need to run RT or PT alongside DLSS 5, but that doesn't make any sense at all given our experience thus far. Applying DLSS 5 to purely rasterized input does make it look better than it otherwise would, but it makes the higher-quality input of RT or PT titles look even better still. You definitely don't want to give up those advanced rendering techniques just because DLSS 5 exists.
But those software factors aren't the biggest hurdle that might affect DLSS 5's delivered performance, at least at the extremes. We were surprised to find that the RTX 5090 Founders Edition design is probably holding back the performance of DLSS 5 on that card, even with its 575W TGP. The Founders Edition was consistently at or near its power limit in our tests with neural rendering enabled, which tracks with the demonstrated evidence that, like other image generation models, DLSS 5 is extremely demanding of the Tensor Cores that power its underlying diffusion model.
The exotic MSI RTX 5090 Lightning Z and its 1000W power limit show that when it's stacked on top of ray tracing or path tracing, DLSS 5 can and will happily slurp down hundreds more watts than the Founders Edition—or any other RTX 5090 with a single power connector—is built to provide.
And when you pair that fact with its large performance cost on today's hardware, it's clear that DLSS 5 is a multi-generational technology built to take full advantage of graphics cards that don't exist yet, whether they're RTX 50 Super-series products with higher power limits or future GeForce products built with more advanced Tensor Cores on a newer silicon process node.
Even as it stands, the results we've seen from DLSS 5 so far in both official demos and in its rapid proliferation through community mods suggest that neural rendering techniques like this will mark a new epoch of photorealistic fidelity for real-time graphics and new generations of hardware that are better suited to running demanding AI models like this in real time.
It's an exciting new frontier out there, even if things feel a bit like the Wild West for DLSS 5 right now. Hold on to your hats.
