Microsoft veteran recalls the last time Nvidia and Arm was the future of Windows — shares a video of ‘the first time Windows ran on Nvidia Tegra Arm’ from 2010

Steven Sinofsky in 2011
(Image credit: Getty Images)

Some people are pretty excited that we are on the cusp of a new Windows PC era ignited by technologies from the mighty Nvidia and Arm. Our article on the teasers for the rumored wave of new N1X laptops makes it clear that companies like Nvidia and Microsoft are excited, at least. However, Microsoft veteran Steven Sinofsky is here to remind folks that it has been done before, with a similar level of simmering excitement, when the first Surface hybrid PC ran on Nvidia Tegra Arm silicon back in 2010/11.

Sinofsky shares some interesting media in the above embedded Tweet. There’s a slide from the promotional deck, shown at CES 2011, where the “strong partnerships” behind this Windows on Arm thrust would surely lead to unstoppable momentum. That’s what you may have believed if you swallowed the effusive presentations at the time.

This prior push for Windows on Arm didn’t exclusively support Nvidia Tegra. Sinofsky points out that Windows 8 on Arm also supported Qualcomm and TI processors. However, we saw Microsoft switch to a Qualcomm partnership focus in the years following. That collaborative effort also didn’t break through, even when the much-lauded Nuvia Oryon architecture arrived with the Snapdragon X family.

Latest Videos From

The former-President of the Windows Division (July 2009 to Nov 2012) also shares a video that should be preserved for posterity. Check it out to witness “an old school Windows Phone video of the first time Windows ran on Nvidia Tegra Arm using the desktop compositor which was a BIG deal. Sept 2010.”

The video appears to show a Tegra dev kit running Windows 7, with multi-window and Start menu manipulation, which looks rather lethargic to my eyes. However, that was a “first” achievement several months before CES 2011, and it would be over a year and a half until the Surface RT shipped to customers (October 2012).

Will the latest Nvidia and Arm thrust into Windows work out better? We’ll probably have a much better idea about that in the coming days at Computex. Sinofsky replies to some comments on his Tweet to say the result could be “a reliable platform for graphics compute,” using Windows. Pricing is also obviously going to be a sticky issue for any new platform looking to attract buyers right now.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Mark Tyson
News Editor

Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.

  • Findecanor
    As I recall, Windows RT was for 32-bit ARM, and could only run apps from the Windows Store.
    Reply
  • badbob001
    Anything released under current conditions will be priced beyond most consumers.
    Reply
  • ezst036
    Admin said:
    Some people are pretty excited that we are on the cusp of a new Windows PC era
    ROFLMAO

    Who? Microsoft Employees?

    Microsoft's bank account? Who? Who. Point to these people.
    Reply
  • Findecanor
    Didn't you know that things that are rarer become more valuable? /s
    Reply
  • palladin9479
    Yeah... kinda like how the MS Surface was going to replace desktop computing.
    Reply
  • Spuwho
    Good luck getting any Day Zero's patched. Microsoft doesnt think they exist anymore.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    palladin9479 said:
    Yeah... kinda like how the MS Surface was going to replace desktop computing.
    As was the iPad before that.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    ARM CPUs have come a long ways and lots of stuff that used to rely on local apps has moved to the web. Windows has changed and evolved, as well. So, I think there's limited value in revisiting that first era of Windows/ARM.

    Of course, that doesn't mean it'll turn out differently, this time around.

    FWIW, I think Snapdragon C is almost as interesting as the N1X, for the Windows/ARM ecosystem. I also think Snapdragon X2 looks pretty good and is likely to get some good publicity as a result of the new N1/N1X-based products launching.
    Reply