ASRock X870E Challenger Wifi Motherboard Review: A value X870E board packed with features

One of the best-equipped sub-$230 X870E motherboards you can buy

ASRock X870E Challenger Wifi
Editor's Choice
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The X870E Challenger sports capable VRMs, and a slew of fast USB ports inculding USB4, making this inexpensive AM5 board one of the best-equipped options under $230.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Robust power delivery

  • +

    Fast USB connectivity all around

  • +

    Flexible IO Shield

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    BIOS still needs a refresh

  • -

    Lacks AI features

  • -

    Slower 160 MHz Wi-Fi 7

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

The latest all-white board to land on our test bench is from ASRock. But this time, it’s more affordable than the updated X870E Taichi White we recently covered. The $230 X870E Challenger Wifi White offers a surprising number of features for the price.

Specs-wise, the Challenger comes handsomely equipped for almost any price point. Features include a basic audio codec, robust VRMs, and ample (and fast!) USB connectivity (including USB4 ports). You also get plenty of internal storage options, with four M.2 sockets (one PCIe 5.0) and two SATA ports, and fast networking with 5 GbE and Wi-Fi 7 (160MHz). Looking at other boards at this price, some don’t include USB4, offer slower 2.5 GbE, or provide weaker audio solutions. For $230, the Challenger is a great deal for an X870E-based board, though, like everything, it has drawbacks that we’ll cover below.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Joe Shields
Staff Writer, Components

Joe Shields is a staff writer at Tom’s Hardware. He reviews motherboards and PC components.

  • TechieTwo
    IME of many years the Asrock mobos provide excellent performance and value. They have struggled a bit with the 870 chip BIOS for some reason but most of that seems resolved. IMO paying the outlandish prices some companies are asking >$300 for a 870/850 mobo is foolishness. There is a lot of price gouging these days so I vote with my wallet.
    Reply
  • PEnns
    ConsBIOS still needs a refresh............... (could be easily fixed)Lacks AI features................................ (that's a Pro, not a con)Slower 160 MHz Wi-Fi 7................. (still fast enough)
    The price is not outrageous, that should be a Pro
    And TEN USB ports, that's really excellent and a big Pro

    If I were in the market,. that would be my choice.
    Reply
  • Vicecrow
    I want less nvme and more pci x slots. Miss the old boards
    Reply
  • UnforcedERROR
    TechieTwo said:
    IME of many years the Asrock mobos provide excellent performance and value. They have struggled a bit with the 870 chip BIOS for some reason but most of that seems resolved. IMO paying the outlandish prices some companies are asking >$300 for a 870/850 mobo is foolishness. There is a lot of price gouging these days so I vote with my wallet.
    I completely agree. I've been using ASRock motherboards since Socket 754 (because of a 939 upgrade board that came out later). Never had an issue. They've always been dependable for me. Have an x670e with a 7700x right now and have no complaints.
    Reply
  • vossile
    What's with all the paint residue? thermal paste? around the PQVC chips around the CPU? Hope that is absolutely 100% non conductive.
    Reply
  • das_stig
    Con: No Ai

    Explain? what good will it do on a motherboard, tweak overclocking, voltages, fans, but just putting it in a list is lazy reviewing, something TH is good at !

    Con: 1 spare full length slots, is not enough, based on most people won't use iGPU? Should be 2x8 open ended minimum.
    Reply
  • justrudi
    "No AI Features" is a clear advantage. What AI features MB providers can actually deliver on a quality, that can't be downloaded within 5 minutes?
    Would be nice for the author to explain it's POV, maybe we are missing some specifically good use cases?

    I am also wondering how does Realtek ALC4082 works on AMD motherboards, as it is known to create latency plugging into the USB-bus, rather than addressing CPU directly.
    Also, it is not a first review I see calling this solution a flagship, but no clear explanation how is it better than older direct HD Audio codecs. Besides being dependent on its own software, it sounds it is also dependent on USB software. Over-digitalization of a sound with Windows led to some games having absolute crap positioning sound. Unless I don't understand something, please correct me.
    Reply
  • cknobman
    Im sick and tired of everything needing AI or getting some kind of mention that it lacks that "feature" and is some kind of negative.

    I specifically look for products without AI.
    Reply