Memory price surge begins to cool as consumers hit affordability limit — AI demand still keeps DRAM and NAND prices climbing through Q3 2026
Long-term supply deals are quietly capping server DRAM prices.
Memory prices will keep climbing through the third quarter of 2026, but the blistering increases of the past few quarters are set to cool as consumer buyers reach the ceiling of what they can afford, according to a detailed TrendForce report. The research firm's latest memory pricing survey projects conventional DRAM contract prices to rise 13% to 18% quarter-over-quarter (QoQ) in Q3 2026, with NAND Flash contract prices increasing 10% to 15%; substantial gains, but a marked slowdown from the roughly 60% jumps recorded in the second quarter.
According to the report, the cooldown is driven by consumer electronics manufacturers' unwillingness and inability to absorb higher memory costs after months of relentless price increases, rather than by improved supply. In other words, memory remains in short supply, but consumers are no longer willing to keep paying ever-higher prices.
AI continues to be the market's driving force. Demand for AI inference systems and hyperscale data centers remains strong enough to keep both DRAM and NAND supply constrained, while memory manufacturers continue shifting production capacity toward higher-margin server products. This leaves less capacity available for consumer memory, preventing prices from falling even as demand from PCs and smartphones weakens.
As a result, the memory market is increasingly split between enterprise and consumer customers. On the server side, TrendForce expects demand to remain healthy through 2027 as improving CPU availability supports continued deployments of AI servers built around x86 processors and registered DIMMs (RDIMMs). Although server DRAM is expected to remain undersupplied during the third quarter, price increases should moderate because a portion of purchases is covered by long-term supply agreements.
Consumer markets appear to paint a very different picture. Notebook manufacturers are expected to keep replenishing inventories, but higher memory costs are gradually feeding through into retail pricing, a trend TrendForce believes could weigh on PC shipments for the rest of the year. Smartphone vendors face similar pressure, with many expected to raise handset prices to offset persistently high LPDRAM (low-power DRAM) costs while simultaneously becoming more cautious with production plans as consumer demand softens.
The same pattern is beginning to emerge across storage products. PC manufacturers accumulated substantial client SSD inventories during the first half of 2026, reducing their willingness to accept another round of price increases. Suppliers have responded by taking a more flexible approach during contract negotiations, helping to moderate SSD pricing even as enterprise storage continues to benefit from AI infrastructure spending.
Not every segment is seeing the same level of demand. TrendForce notes that NVIDIA's RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell has yet to generate the expected wave of GDDR7 demand, while weaker notebook shipments have also softened demand for graphics memory. At the opposite end of the market, retail products such as USB flash drives and memory cards remain sluggish as higher upstream costs become increasingly difficult to pass on to consumers.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
For PC builders, the report suggests that meaningful price relief is still some way off. Memory prices are continuing to rise because AI infrastructure remains the industry's top priority. However, the pace of those increases is slowing as consumer demand reaches its breaking point.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Etiido Uko is a news contributor for Tom's Hardware covering the latest updates in big tech and the PC industry. He is a mechanical engineer and senior technical writer with over nine years of experience in documentation and reporting. He is deeply passionate about all things engineering and technology, and is an expert in gadgets, manufacturing, robotics, automotive, and aerospace.
-
brotec Reply"Memory manufacturers aren't charities! Yes it sucks for low income consumers but DRAM producers are well within their rights to charge whatever they want and reduce consumer production to maximize profits from the hyperscaler market. It's just the way it is."
-
Kindaian True, but eventually, there is a market for lower cost memory that is unfulfilled right now and it is not going away.Reply
The issue is AI is paying premium for ANY memory right now and cleaning up all the shelves.
Imagine that you go to the supermarket and there is no eggs on sale for 4 years, because someone brought all production at the source? And you needed to pay like 10 USD for 1 egg? -
Stomx "Prices going to fall", "not justified cost", "price fixing" are not very popular subjects in computer tech media. Mostly salespeople are readers here I suspect for decades.Reply -
hwertz Reply"Memory manufacturers aren't charities! Yes it sucks for low income consumers but DRAM producers are well within their rights to charge whatever they want and reduce consumer production to maximize profits from the hyperscaler market. It's just the way it is."
Well, as a matter of fact colluding and price fixing are both illegal. I mean, nobody is stopping them, and regulators in the past failed to fine them anywhere near enough to actually discourage them (like one round of fines one of them was fined $9 billion but had set aside like $20 billion already to pay the fines...) But no, they are not well within their rights to do what they are doing. -
greenreaper Reply
Guess you better think carefully about how much you want that egg. Hopefully it leads to recipes that require fewer of them, and less wastage of the ones we have already.Kindaian said:Imagine that you go to the supermarket and there is no eggs on sale for 4 years, because someone brought all production at the source? And you needed to pay like 10 USD for 1 egg?
I appreciate that's putting a positive spin on a bad situation, but software didn't use to use so much RAM or disk space - there's a lot developers could do to help the situation.
This might cost more in development time but it's now clearly worth doing, and will probably make the software concerned faster as well (efficiency tends to be a win/win; there are cases you trade space for time, but often a better algorithm uses less of both). -
greenreaper Reply
It's illegal to fix a price if you are on the same side of a market. It's not illegal to fix a price between buyer and seller, aka "long-term supply agreements" (although there are elements to such deals which regulators might look into, such as required related investments).hwertz said:Well, as a matter of fact colluding and price fixing are both illegal.
As you say, collusion for the purpose of anti-competitive pricing is also illegal, but raising your prices because others are and you are running out of capacity is not. There appears to be a real structural basis for this crisis. -
King_V Reply
So, while I'm not saying poorly written software doesn't exist, how do you figure it's the responsibility of the software developers to predict and plan for this situation?greenreaper said:I appreciate that's putting a positive spin on a bad situation, but software didn't use to use so much RAM or disk space - there's a lot developers could do to help the situation.
If I could do that, I wouldn't be in software anymore, I'd've bought up a ton of DDR5 and retired off the boom.
And, better written software wouldn't have been enough to mitigate the current RAM price situation. -
TheWerewolf I just want to say how refreshing it is to read a professionally written article. The author is to the point, objective and keeps themselves out of the article. They even follow the rule of defining an acronym on first use.Reply -
TheWerewolf Replygreenreaper said:Guess you better think carefully about how much you want that egg. Hopefully it leads to recipes that require fewer of them, and less wastage of the ones we have already.
I appreciate that's putting a positive spin on a bad situation, but software didn't use to use so much RAM or disk space - there's a lot developers could do to help the situation.
This might cost more in development time but it's now clearly worth doing, and will probably make the software concerned faster as well (efficiency tends to be a win/win; there are cases you trade space for time, but often a better algorithm uses less of both).
Except this shows how screwed up capitalism is in the US. I've noticed a lot of people with similar views to yours which essentially can be summed up as "live with it" and it's the worst kind of consumer mindset possible.
Classic capitalism says "if the existing producers can't or won't compete, new producers will come in and fill the gap", except now, that rarely happens because there's no incentive and no regulation. If consumers just accept it, why even try to improve things? They're making money will less effort.
Consumers being price or availability sensitive and using that to impact producers is the other half of capitalism, but in the US at least, much like how labour laws and labour rights have been abandoned "because we have no say" (apparently democracy doesn't work in "the nation that invented it"), business has convinced at least some consumers that they should just take what they get (or in the case of Apple, joyously take what they get).
In essence, you are the problem.
As for software, speaking as a software dev of 50 years, you really have no idea what you're talking about. Software increasingly not only does more, works with more data, but has UI attached that makes it easier for non-technical users to understand. If you want minimalist software, it exists - see Linux. But also notice that Linux, after 35 years still barely hits 5% adoption... and it's free.
Maybe stop blaming the consumer for wanting things and start asking why "capitalists" are so bad as being capitalists. -
usertests I see that 32 GB DDR5 has crept up from around $350 to $400 on Newegg. Can we hit $500?Reply
I recommend that people install LibreELEC (works fine with as little as 2 GB RAM), and doomwatch videos about the current situation.TheWerewolf said:But also notice that Linux, after 35 years still barely hits 5% adoption... and it's free.