'The retail SSD market has almost disappeared,' says Silicon Motion exec — PC OEMs are buying third-party drives as direct NAND supply dries up
But developers of SSD controllers still benefit from the situation.
As memory makers prioritize shipments of their products to the AI sector, prices of solid-state drives for consumer applications increased significantly over the last few quarters, which naturally caused retail sales of SSDs to drop significantly in 2026. Nelson Duann, a vice president at Silicon Motion, one of the largest SSD controller makers in the world, said in an interview with Tom's Hardware at Computex 2026 that the retail drive market had almost disappeared in the first half of 2026. Nonetheless, the company still sold plenty of SSD controllers to module makers (the companies that make the finished SSDs), but those devices primarily went to PC OEMs.
"The retail SSD market has almost disappeared," Duann told us during the interview. "The controllers we sell to module makers are now largely ending up in SSDs that are shipped to PC OEMs. The reason is that OEMs cannot obtain enough NAND directly from memory manufacturers, so they are increasingly sourcing SSDs from module makers instead."
According to Duann, PC makers have to buy from SSD module makers because NAND vendors reduced allocation to the client/consumer PC market and redirected most NAND supply to data center products.
As a result, PC OEMs like Acer, Asus, Dell, and HP cannot get enough NAND or SSD supply directly from NAND manufacturers and have to turn to module makers for solid-state drives. The latter traditionally served end-users and had plenty of aftermarket products with enhanced performance and cooling, but now they increasingly serve PC makers instead.
"In the past, most module makers focused on the retail market," Duann said. "Since late last year and into this year, that has changed. OEM demand has become much stronger, and module makers are now supplying a significant portion of their production directly to PC manufacturers. As a result, most of the controllers we sell to module makers ultimately end up in systems built by PC OEMs."
The reallocation of NAND flash supply from the consumer segment to the AI data center segment has caused structural changes in the market in general, hurting some companies badly, but letting others benefit. For independent developers of SSD controllers — such as Phison and Silicon Motion — the situation is generally positive as demand for server-grade drives is increasing, whereas sales of client storage devices are not necessarily decreasing unit-wise. For more details, check out the whole interview with Nelson Duann on Tom's Hardware.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.
-
usertests Reply
Are you going to argue that Nvidia developing CUDA in 2007 led to the transformer paper in 2017 and ChatGPT in 2022?ezst036 said:Hope everybody who insisted on buying an Nvidia GPU is proud of themselves.
Otherwise, AMD, Intel, or any number of other companies would have happily filled Nvidia's place in the industry if they had the opportunity. -
Neilbob Reply
Probably. Enormous incoming cash reserves do seem to have a way of causing large corporations to engage in avaricious behaviour. I wonder, if AMD hadn't dropped the ball so badly around that time, would they have ended up being the ultimate villains?usertests said:Are you going to argue that Nvidia developing CUDA in 2007 led to the transformer paper in 2017 and ChatGPT in 2022?
Otherwise, AMD, Intel, or any number of other companies would have happily filled Nvidia's place in the industry if they had the opportunity.
In any case, thanks to that tiresome little initialism (A.I-gagh!) technology is apparently no longer for normal consumers. We may as well return to filling our personal time with entertaining ourselves by reading books, and playing board games with the family, around the dining table on dark winter evenings.
Yeah, we really did do stuff like that, at least in my family. Crikey, I'm old. -
usertests Reply
All that stuff and/or learn to love older games on older GPUs or integrated graphics.Neilbob said:In any case, thanks to that tiresome little initialism (A.I-gagh!) technology is apparently no longer for normal consumers. We may as well return to filling our personal time with entertaining ourselves by reading books, and playing board games with the family, around the dining table on dark winter evenings.
Yeah, we really did do stuff like that, at least in my family. Crikey, I'm old.
Most of the games people want to play will run on a sub-$80 used graphics card like an RX 580 8GB (here's one with new fans and paste wow). Many older games will run on quad-core Skylake with HD 530 iGPU at 720p/1080p.
For example, hopefully we'll see Skyblivion released soon as an antidote to the comically unoptimized Oblivion Remastered.
Consumers may still need a 1 TB SSD in their life. It's a matter of spending around $130-200, depending on the brand/type. -
SmokyBarnable The whole AI disaster is one of the best case studies for government regulation I’ve ever seen.Reply -
Wraithtek Reply
Slapping an "I bought it before Jensen went crazy" bumper sticker on my 4080.ezst036 said:Hope everybody who insisted on buying an Nvidia GPU is proud of themselves. -
Ricket5 Reply
Actually yes. The 8800 GTX and CUDA were the start of the end. Jensen saw the writing on the wall that GPUs were no longer for games but massive multicore processors that could be used for other tasks.usertests said:Are you going to argue that Nvidia developing CUDA in 2007 led to the transformer paper in 2017 and ChatGPT in 2022?
Otherwise, AMD, Intel, or any number of other companies would have happily filled Nvidia's place in the industry if they had the opportunity.
Even back then we already saw this with datacenters and supercomputers using GPUs to pull ahead. Education facilities and scientific researchers or home hobbyists buying multiple GPUs in towers to use them for computing. The future was obvious then. The Titan itself was pitched as a compute card not really a game card. RTX cores and other stuff sure can game but their point is in compute. The X090 cards aren't really made for gaming either.
Nvidia was honest about this. Early quotes of not being a GPU company anymore really but a software company. AI is just the newest thing but nvidia has not been a gaming company since CUDA. Gamers just refused to admit this and thought they were special and still don't want to admit gaming is going to the cloud as a tiered service which is naive.
Nobody was sneaking about this. It was out there and everyone not deluded saw it coming for now two decades. It was only gamers who refused to admit reality and are now gnashing their teeth and stomping their feet about it. -
USAFRet I'm glad my personal realm is all stocked up on SSDs. It will be several years before I need a new one.Reply -
Sluggotg Reply
Same here, I have over a dozen that I bought over the past several years. I got most of them on sale. I bought them for new builds and spares. Most are 4 gig and 2 gig M.2 drives.USAFRet said:I'm glad my personal realm is all stocked up on SSDs. It will be several years before I need a new one. -
Sippincider Not being able to get hardware, because production is being prioritized for something I have no intention of using...Reply