x64 port of Microsoft Word for Windows 1.1a arrives — you can now run this seminal 1990 word processor natively in Windows 11

Microsoft Word for Windows 1.1a
(Image credit: The Computer History Museum (CHM).)

A developer has ported Microsoft Word for Windows 1.1a to x64 so it can now run natively on Windows 11 PC systems. JMarshall23 on GitHub stresses that this is a fully working native Windows x64 port using “original Word source and resources together with modern replacements for the 16-bit assembly, segmented-memory, and Win16 platform boundaries.” It also includes some extra features for “research purposes.” Microsoft Word for Windows 1.1a was originally released over a quarter of a century ago.

This release of Word marked a milestone in the word processing market, as it pioneered genuinely useful feature additions like WYSIWYG editing, graphics, and table insertion on Windows. It would spearhead the momentum in shifting users from DOS productivity monsters like WordPerfect to complete dominance in Windows-land. Word for Windows 1.1a added all its frills while remaining very efficient, running on systems with CPUs that ran in single-figure MHz speeds, and with as little as 1MB of RAM.

Microsoft Word for Windows 1.1a

WinWord won (Image credit: The Computer History Museum (CHM).)

Another notable feature of this version of Word for Windows is that Microsoft permitted its source code to be released in full. You can still grab that code via the Computer History Museum (CHM). There you will find a 7MB bundle of C source, x86 assembly, build tools, and documentation. These 1,021 files in 33 folders are what JMarshall23 started with.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware

GitHub doesn’t have Windows x64 binaries ready for the casually curious on the lookout for a free, lightweight word processor to download and use. Instead, you’ll need access to Visual Studio 2022 with Desktop development with C++, a Windows 10 or Windows 11 SDK installed through Visual Studio, CMake 3.25 or newer, and PowerShell, notes Marshall. Then simply follow the GitHub instructions to build and run Word1.

It will be interesting to see if more comes from this x64 port, but Microsoft’s Word for Windows 1.1a code release carries a license that “permits only non-commercial use and does not give you the right to license it to third parties by posting copies elsewhere on the web,” says the CHM.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Mark Tyson
News Editor

Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.

  • usertests
    I vaguely remember people treating the 1997 (maybe 2003) version as the definitive contemporary version in the 2000s. Specifically meaning you picked that from the dropdown when saving for wide compatibility. I don't remember anymore.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Word#Release_history
    Reply
  • Scott_Tx
    Looking forward to the whole Windows 2000 recompile we can run on our 1gb systems.
    Reply
  • Mindstab Thrull
    I have Office 2000. Never had any reason to upgrade. LibreOffice, Google Docs, et al still read them perfectly fine. Just need a patch to handle DOCX, XLSX, etc files and away I go. I would say most people don't need any of the other stuff that comes with newer versions. Some people might need some newer features but I certainly don't.

    Mindstab Thrull
    Reply
  • Math Geek
    mine is Office 2007. that one stuck with me and i've not seen any reason to update. mainly it was that i hated the new GUI but it's now about all the bloated junk i don't need/want in a simple word processor.
    Reply
  • JRStern
    I used Word for DOS with my $$$ QMS postscript laser printer, I don't even recall when I slid over to Word for Windows but I think it was not any version 1.1, maybe a 2.x?
    Reply
  • krank23
    "Released over a quarter of a century ago" — and here's today's reminder "a quarter of a century ago" is 2001.
    Reply