Bernie Sanders files bill proposing 50% public ownership of US AI firms and giving out $1,000 dividends — VP Vance says Trump supports giving the American people a stake in AI companies, prefers ‘pre-distribution’ over giving away cash
The two seem aligned on this issue
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) has introduced the American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Act to the U.S. Senate, which aims to gain 50% ownership of U.S. AI firms through a sovereign wealth fund. According to the Senator’s webpage, the first thing this would do is establish the Independent Commission for Democratic AI, which has seven bipartisan members nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate. This body would control 50% of the voting shares of American AI tech companies, meaning it would have the capacity to “block decisions that hurt the American people and to push for policies that help them.”
The Vermont Senator has always been skeptical about AI. Late last year, he called for a complete halt on all data center construction in the U.S. to ensure that the technology benefits everyone and “not just the 1%.” It seems that this idea went nowhere, and his next pitch to the American people is for the establishment of the AI sovereign wealth fund. Sanders’ office estimates that the fund would be valued at $7 trillion at the current value of these companies, and that a 5% annual dividend would grant $1,000 for everyone in the United States.
Aside from that, it would also be used for funding to improve the lifestyle of every American through “decent and dignified standard of living, including the right to health care, education, housing, and a healthy and habitable environment. The bill has just been filed, though, and we still expect it to go through multiple rounds of debates and revisions if it passes at all.
President Donald Trump likes Sanders' idea
In a surprising twist, VP JD Vance said that President Donald Trump likes the idea that the U.S. would gain a controlling stake in every American AI company. The VP likened the AI revolution to the industrial revolution, wherein it’s not the lack of jobs that became the problem that drove several parts of Europe towards communism and fascism. Instead, he claims that it’s the concentration of wealth among a small group of people that became the catalyst for civil strife in the Western world.
“You go back to the industrial revolution. Was mass joblessness the main consequence of the shift from an agricultural to an industrial economy?” the VP asked Steven Bartlett, the host and creator of The Diary of a CEO podcast. “No. But what did happen? Rich people got way richer. And that led to, in Europe, fascism and communism. In fact, your country and my country [are] pretty much the only two countries that successfully avoided either a fascist or communist revolution in response to the industrial revolution.” He also added that capitalists shouldn’t take advantage of workers, which is similar to Sanders’ idea of installing a voting member from the American people (through the government) in every American AI company.
“The average American, the average Brit, the average Western society member has stagnated and people really hate relative poverty,” Vance added. “You can give people iPhones, and you can give people the creature comforts of a 21st-century economy, but you make rich people way richer, you are going to have significant problems.”
But even though it seems that Sanders and the administration are in agreement, Vance says that he does not favor Sanders’ cash redistribution model, wherein the people would receive an annual dividend from the fund. He said that with redistribution, “you turn the poor people into effectively subservients (sic) of the rich people” and that it “never provided a stable society.” Instead, the current administration’s idea, which it calls “pre-distribution” is to give normal people “a seat at the bargaining table.” He says that it’s impossible for a single person to bargain with a company for better wages, but with workers working together, this is where the idea of collective bargaining came from. But the Vice President says that this idea should go beyond economics, as it can also help shape the culture being formed in the age of AI.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
You can watch the complete interview below:
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.
-
TechieTwo Good ole Bernie... He doesn't know the U.S. is based on capitalism not on socialism.Reply -
Geef Lets make a new bill. The bill gives 50% public ownership of Bernie Sander's money and gives it out.Reply
;)👍 -
ravewulf Reply
Public school, public libraries, Social Security, Medicare, public roads, fire departments, etc. The two systems work hand in handTechieTwo said:Good ole Bernie... He doesn't know the U.S. is based on capitalism not on socialism. -
hotaru251 ReplyHe says that it’s impossible for a single person to bargain with a company for better wages, but with workers working together, this is where the idea of collective bargaining came from.
except when majority of your nation is poor(this is cost of living poor not the joke that is the official poverty line) they can be bought out by the rich and "buy" their votes as the people who are poor have a much needier desire for instant income.
The wealth creation of capitalism and the industrial development that comes with it lays the foundation for socialism.TechieTwo said:Good ole Bernie... He doesn't know the U.S. is based on capitalism not on socialism. -
Geef Who wants Free Money?Reply
:D✋:D🖐️:D🤚Who wants to pay for other people's Free Money?
🤨 :confused: :( -
circadia Reply
do you like shilling for AI companies that much?Geef said:Who wants Free Money?
:D✋:D🖐️:D🤚Who wants to pay for other people's Free Money?
🤨 :confused: :( -
LordVile Reply
I mean they’re getting at least 37% anyway considering he actually pays correct taxesGeef said:Lets make a new bill. The bill gives 50% public ownership of Bernie Sander's money and gives it out.
;)👍 -
JTWrenn Reply
It's funny how people have been talked into the idea that taxing the rich and giving it to the government is the equivalent of theft, but doing the opposite is good for the people and the economy. Just a very weird thing.Geef said:Who wants Free Money?
:D✋:D🖐️:D🤚Who wants to pay for other people's Free Money?
🤨 :confused: :(
AI and natural resources both fall into categories that make sense for some form of socialized ownership. Without it they cause massive damage to the population. So many wars started over energy that didn't benefit the people.
Can it be socialized? I doubt we will ever see it to the degree bernie says in the USA, but it will be interesting to see how countries that are more socialist in Europe go for it and if it works out. Considering how much governments invest through subsidize in companies anyway we could just become owners instead ans pread out the wealth since the rich have decided to fight taxation and sharing so much...I think we need to push back. They won't do it on their own. -
Zaranthos If you want a stake in AI invest your own money. I don't pay my taxes to give you a stake in any company. Plus if AI is the bubble many claim why should my tax dollars go to inflate the bubble? Government needs to stop wasting the money they take from us until they can manage to stop wasting what they already take.Reply
Public schools = Terrible performance record despite more money spent than most countries.
Social security = Nearly bankrupt because the trust fund originally set up was spent by government.
Public roads and bridges = We constantly hear how much disrepair there is despite gas tax money funding that. Since the gas tax was established to fun this 30 other bills passed with additional funding for roads and bridges.
Fire departments = Much the same. Started out funded by the private sector, then local governments, and now 100's of millions per year in federal funding along with all kinds of other legislation that throws money at it.
It's common for many of these public sector jobs to pay out 6 figure incomes to administration, better benefits than most private sector jobs at least in rural or smaller communities, and have very little free market competition to apply market pressure for them to provide quality or good results. Not saying I'm necessarily against these things, just saying I don't think adding more to the list with my tax money appeals to me either considering the governments track record.
Spend more time fixing the stuff you already oversee before asking me to fund more things. -
Air2004 Reply
Free is the most expensive thing you'll ever pay for. As for those who are in agreement with spending other people's money, you eventually run out of other people's money. Can you guess who then have to foot the bill?circadia said:do you like shilling for AI companies that much?