Broadcom and OpenAI unveil custom-built Jalapeño inference processor — OpenAI's first chip is a massive reticle-sized ASIC built in an ultra-fast nine-month development cycle

OpenAI Jalapeño
(Image credit: OpenAI)

OpenAI and Broadcom have introduced Jalapeño, a custom-built inference processor designed specifically for modern large language models and future agentic AI workloads, which is designed to deliver performance per watt they claim is higher than today's leading-edge hardware. OpenAI considers its hardware project a strategic one and envisions Jalapeño to be the first generation of its inference hardware.

Not another AI accelerator

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • usertests
    Based on early testing, Jalapeño will efficiently execute our most important workloads close to the hardware’s theoretical limits.
    It sounds like it can be configured to run multiple models and they don't need a new ASIC for every model. For example, Taalas made an ASIC with a similar reticle-limit size that could only run Llama 3.1 8B, but with insanely high performance and efficiency.

    Seeing the outcry from users when their beloved models are killed off, maybe it's fine to have the same model available for a few years, using models baked into ASICs for lower operating costs.
    Reply
  • Lieutenant Barclay
    usertests said:
    Seeing the outcry from users when their beloved models are killed off, maybe it's fine to have the same model available for a few years
    Maybe we can start a support group for everyone feeling a loss over their "beloved model". You know, some grief counseling.

    Problem is "AI" pumpers are stuck in the first 3 stages: denial, anger, and bargaining :LOL:
    Reply
  • usertests
    Lieutenant Barclay said:
    Maybe we can start a support group for everyone feeling a loss over their "beloved model". You know, some grief counseling.

    Problem is "AI" pumpers are stuck in the first 3 stages: denial, anger, and bargaining :LOL:
    https://www.cosmopolitan.com/relationships/a66022416/ai-boyfriend-reddit/https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crl43dxwwy9ohttps://www.techradar.com/ai-platforms-assistants/chatgpt/im-grieving-openai-has-switched-off-chatgpt-4o-and-angry-users-are-backing-a-keep4o-campaign-to-restore-it
    Reply
  • alan.campbell99
    Assuming these things get deployed, can they be used for anything else when the bubble pops? Also given how it differs from the 'usual' GPU compute modules will this add even more cost to data center projects?
    Reply
  • usertests
    alan.campbell99 said:
    Assuming these things get deployed, can they be used for anything else when the bubble pops?
    I think it's extremely less likely for ASICs to be useful, but not impossible since it doesn't look like it's tied to a single model.

    If SHTF, tech scavengers could at least harvest useless accelerators for the HBM. But more general purpose parts can be used for local AI.

    alan.campbell99 said:
    Also given how it differs from the 'usual' GPU compute modules will this add even more cost to data center projects?
    Are they not using an industry standard form factor?
    Reply
  • DougMcC
    alan.campbell99 said:
    Assuming these things get deployed, can they be used for anything else when the bubble pops? Also given how it differs from the 'usual' GPU compute modules will this add even more cost to data center projects?
    The AI bubble might pop. But the inference demand is not going away. I have uses for at least another quadrillion tokens in mind. So do lots of other people. If this hardware is sold off at a big loss it will still be getting used for inference.
    Reply
  • Tiz.io
    Lieutenant Barclay said:
    Maybe we can start a support group for everyone feeling a loss over their "beloved model". You know, some grief counseling.

    Problem is "AI" pumpers are stuck in the first 3 stages: denial, anger, and bargaining :LOL:
    I know people have had personal reasons to get attached to particular models, but as a professional engineer who integrates llms into products, I can tell you it's a massive pain having to reevaluate every integrated prompt when the underlying model changes. Sonnet 4 was perfectly fine for the sort of classification and categorization we use, but when they discontinued it, we spent many hours retooling and testing just to use the more expensive model.

    The next forced upgrade will see us moving to self-hosted models for greater stability.
    Reply
  • DS426
    Tiz.io said:
    I know people have had personal reasons to get attached to particular models, but as a professional engineer who integrates llms into products, I can tell you it's a massive pain having to reevaluate every integrated prompt when the underlying model changes. Sonnet 4 was perfectly fine for the sort of classification and categorization we use, but when they discontinued it, we spent many hours retooling and testing just to use the more expensive model.

    The next forced upgrade will see us moving to self-hosted models for greater stability.
    Why wait for the next model rug pull? Find a good open source LLM for local inference that works for your needs and don't look back.
    Reply
  • DS426
    Model-specific ASIC's aren't worth the sand IMO, but ones that still have enough flexibility to run a family of models or several defined characteristics of vendor-agnostic models, sure, especially for models that are built with the intention of having long-term support / stability (minimal tweaks).
    Reply
  • usertests
    DS426 said:
    Model-specific ASIC's aren't worth the sand IMO,
    I think it could make sense if:
    The performance and efficiency benefits are immense
    You can do some fine-tuning after the fact
    Model quality starts to hit a plateau, taking years to get significantly betterIn the Taalas example, they reportedly got 8.5x the performance of a Cerebras Wafer Scale Engine 3, using ~1/10th the power, and a much smaller, cheaper die. But only for the Llama 3.1 8B model hard-wired into the chip. They claimed that:
    While largely hard-wired for speed, the Llama retains flexibility through configurable context window size and support for fine-tuning via low-rank adapters (LoRAs).

    The die was 815mm^2 on TSMC N6, which is a big die for an 8 billion parameter model. I wonder if they would need MCMs and a better node to handle 70B.

    An ~85x increase in performance/Watt could make model-specific ASICs viable, even if they are considered e-waste within a few years.
    Reply