China is considering export controls on AI technologies, including banning local companies from using TSMC, report claims — restrictions would also cover advanced AI models, training data, and overseas acquisitions

China
(Image credit: Getty Images)

China is considering a major expansion of its technology export restrictions that could cover advanced AI models, training data, and overseas acquisitions of strategically important technology companies, reports the Financial Times. In addition, the Chinese government is mulling over prohibiting local chip designers from making their chips at TSMC and other foreign chipmakers.

The measures would be designed to keep leading-edge AI developments in China as competition with the U.S. in frontier AI and hardware intensifies, but at the same time, they would slow down expansions of Chinese AI standards globally, which generally weakens the country's position.

China's Ministry of Commerce (MofCom) has consulted domestic AI and semiconductor companies about ways to keep critical technologies from transferring abroad or falling under Western control, reports Financial Times citing two people familiar with the talks. Regulators have talked with Alibaba, ByteDance, and Zhipu about potentially limiting transfers of important AI training data outside China and restricting foreign users from downloading model weights.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware

Overseas customers could still access Chinese AI services and models remotely, so Chinese companies can still monetize their work from foreign customers. However, restrictions on downloadable model weights could still have significant implications for China's AI industry. DeepSeek and Moonshot offer open-weight models that users can download, deploy on their own infrastructure, and modify for specific workloads. Meanwhile, flagship models from Anthropic and OpenAI remain closed, which means that Chinese companies have an edge over rivals that they are about to lose.

In addition, MofCom has reportedly asked for industry feedback on possible restrictions that would prevent overseas chipmakers like TSMC from producing advanced processors based on designs developed by Chinese companies such as Alibaba, ByteDance, and Huawei. This is perhaps the most controversial proposal, as TSMC is clearly ahead of SMIC when it comes to process technology leadership. On the one hand, the move ensures that SMIC will have enough orders to pay for its R&D and expansion. On the other hand, Chinese companies can get better hardware if it is produced by TSMC.

Separately, the Chinese government is considering tighter controls over foreign acquisitions of strategic technology companies, including firms that work on agentic AI technologies. The potential acquisition rules are intended in part to close what Beijing considers a regulatory loophole that enabled Meta to acquire Manus for $2 billion. Chinese authorities subsequently ordered the transaction to be undone.

The measures could be included in the next revision of China's catalogue of technologies prohibited or restricted from export. The catalogue already includes rare-earth materials, their processing technologies, and several lithium-ion battery production technologies.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

TOPICS
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • usertests
    restrictions would also advanced AI models
    Fix your headline
    Reply
  • zsydeepsky
    Tom's (or the entire American) news coverage deficiency led to this amazing piece.

    China just held WAIC (World AI Conference) in Shanghai from 7.17 to 7.20, which you won't even notice if you only follow traditional US media. Xi personally attended the opening of the conference, and he literally proposed to "encourage open source, openness, collaboration and sharing".
    Yahoo News: Xi Jinping positions China as open-source AI leader at WAIC 2026
    Then, 2 days after the conference, you got this piece, which claims "China is considering export controls on AI technologies", like Xi has no say in Chinese policy or whatever.

    Just make up you mind: is Xi a dictator or not?
    Reply
  • cptjcup
    zsydeepsky said:
    Tom's (or the entire American) news coverage deficiency led to this amazing piece.

    China just held WAIC (World AI Conference) in Shanghai from 7.17 to 7.20, which you won't even notice if you only follow traditional US media. Xi personally attended the opening of the conference, and he literally proposed to "encourage open source, openness, collaboration and sharing".
    Yahoo News: Xi Jinping positions China as open-source AI leader at WAIC 2026
    Then, 2 days after the conference, you got this piece, which claims "China is considering export controls on AI technologies", like Xi has no say in Chinese policy or whatever.

    Just make up you mind: is Xi a dictator or not?
    Well, they are certainly not making this up. It's not only all over the American news, but also Japanese and South Korean. Give it another 12-18 hours, it'll be all over the Global Times and SCMP, as well.
    Reply
  • zsydeepsky
    cptjcup said:
    Well, they are certainly not making this up. It's not only all over the American news, but also Japanese and South Korean. Give it another 12-18 hours, it'll be all over the Global Times and SCMP, as well.
    If it's all over the news in the US, then this probably means that the US is going to ban open-source models.
    It's a preparation to justify what is going to happen, or at least what they want to happen.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    AWWWRIGHT.....

    No more politics.
    At all.

    Further weirdness will simply be deleted.
    Continue, and account access may be impacted.

    Deal?
    Reply
  • Stomx
    The news is believable specifically after Kimi K3 over-jumped in many tests other AI models. This model though will not be easily accessible for enthusiasts anyway as even 4bit Q4 one requires 1.5TB of RAM and full model needs 3TB. Lower quantization models are usually a garbage

    The prospects look even dimmer for the future. In a year the RAM requirements will further grow 2-4 times and you will just naturally say bye to your dreams for open local AI. We all will pay to Bigtech for AI subscriptions same as all in US pay today to Microsoft for the Office and MS gets 100s of $B just from that. OpenOffice or LibreOffice in Linux are a garbage and only for basic use (try to use and edit equations there, looks like their developers are sleeping on their hands for 3 decades).
    Reply
  • Stomx
    dva852 said:
    More "the Man is keeping us down" claptrap. Seriously, aren't you ever tired of the mouthing same victimhood drivel over and over?
    Sorry that you couldn't digest it and choked.
    Reply
  • Why_Me
    USAFRet said:
    AWWWRIGHT.....

    No more politics.
    At all.

    Further weirdness will simply be deleted.
    Continue, and account access may be impacted.

    Deal?
    Tom's post this piece in the News forum and afterwards you make that post which tells me you didn't read the article.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    Why_Me said:
    Tom's post this piece in the News forum and afterwards you make that post which tells me you didn't read the article.
    And you, my friend, missed the point.
    I was speaking to the general respondents here. Not the contents of the article.
    Reply
  • Why_Me
    USAFRet said:
    And you, my friend, missed the point.
    I was speaking to the general respondents here. Not the contents of the article.
    This article amongst others in this forum are political in general.
    Reply