Elon Musk categorically denies SpaceX is making an AI device with proprietary OS — says rumors of a handheld thinner than an iPhone are 'utterly false'
No smoke without fire?
Elon Musk has slammed reports that SpaceX is developing a handheld AI device as "Utterly False," in a post on X. It follows a report from the Wall Street Journal on Wednesday claiming that SpaceX had demonstrated an early prototype of a handheld device featuring xAI's artificial intelligence technologies and a proprietary operating system to a small group of investors ahead of the company's initial public offering.
Utterly falseJuly 1, 2026
The handheld device from SpaceX is reportedly thinner than Apple's iPhone, is based on a Qualcomm Snapdragon system-on-chip, and runs a proprietary operating system, according to the WSJ story. The main selling point of the device is its artificial intelligence technologies from xAI. However, the report does not elaborate on their nature or how they integrate with the operating system. The concept device remains in its infancy and may never become a commercial product. Furthermore, assuming that it is in its early stages of development, its final look and specifications would likely differ significantly from the prototype.
Earlier this year, Reuters reported that SpaceX was developing a smartphone, citing its sources, which reportedly stressed that SpaceX has had plans for a handset for years. At the time, Musk told Reuters that a hypothetical Starlink phone would be 'not out of the question at some point,' but admitted that it would be an AI-centric device that would be 'very different than current phones.' Nonetheless, in an X post, Musk denied his company was building 'a phone.' Based on the comment Musk made today, SpaceX is still not developing a smartphone-like device.
Meanwhile, this would not be the first time Musk has denied something that later turns out to be true. After Reuters reported Tesla had canceled its inexpensive Model 2 vehicle in April, 2024, Musk replied, 'Reuters is lying (again)' without elaborating. Tesla still has not launched its low-cost electric vehicle, but prioritized Robotaxi instead. Furthermore, the company has not touched upon Model 2 in its conference calls in detail in the years that followed, essentially confirming that the entry-level Model 2 in the form that was envisioned before 2024 has been cancelled.
Building a smartphone that connects to Starlink satellites and terrestrial 5G networks is theoretically possible: there are 3GPP Release-18 and 3GPP Release-19 5G-NTN specifications that are designed to achieve just that, and many modern devices already support texting using NTNs. For a mobile device that supports both 5G and NTN networks today, the biggest challenges are to build a modem and a front-end module that can hit the right balance between performance, reliability, area, and power consumption. Of course, the constellation itself has to offer enough 'backbone' bandwidth to support global communications.
While an always-connected handheld device with advanced AI capabilities would, from many points of view, reflect Musk's long-standing ambition to create an 'everything app,' it would automatically make SpaceX compete against companies like Apple, Google, Samsung, and many other multinational conglomerates. Tough competition is arguably not something that any CEO would like to admit, especially when the product in question is in its infancy and there is an IPO ahead.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.
-
usertests I don't see an OpenAI phone or SpaceX phone catching on. It's just bubble things that will end in ruin.Reply
Back in the day I thought the Amazon Fire phone was viable, a natural extension of their e-reader/tablet business. It had five front-facing cameras for glasses-free 3D perspective. They canned it and wrote it down for $170 million.
It's a hard market to break into and any established player can add AI features. -
ggeeoorrggee So based on his response, I estimate an 85% chance they’re making or wanting to make the device the WSJ reported on. Given Grok calls itself “MechaHitler”, I propose some marketing names:Reply
1. Nano Nazi
2. Handheld Hitler
3. Pocket Putsch
4. The Final Device -
blppt Reply
I think probably the main limiting factor in consumers willing to buy a SpaceX phone or OpenAI phone would have to be proudly displaying the logo of two leaders that are currently openly despised by a decent portion of the buying public.usertests said:I don't see an OpenAI phone or SpaceX phone catching on. It's just bubble things that will end in ruin.
Back in the day I thought the Amazon Fire phone was viable, a natural extension of their e-reader/tablet business. It had five front-facing cameras for glasses-free 3D perspective. They canned it and wrote it down for $170 million.
It's a hard market to break into and any established player can add AI features.
Which is why businesses tend to not let their "faces" act that way for long before kicking them to the curb. Well, at least in the past, who knows anymore? -
SteJBorchard Reply
I always knew when I saw Mecha Hitler in wolfstein 3d, 1995. It would rise again!ggeeoorrggee said:So based on his response, I estimate an 85% chance they’re making or wanting to make the device the WSJ reported on. Given Grok calls itself “MechaHitler”, I propose some marketing names:
1. Nano Nazi
2. Handheld Hitler
3. Pocket Putsch
4. The Final Device -
King_V ReplyElon Musk categorically denies SpaceX is making an AI device with proprietary OS
Did . . uh . . did anyone actually ask? -
alan.campbell99 Reply
Indeed, first I've heard about this too.King_V said:Did . . uh . . did anyone actually ask? -
Geef Reply
An earlier version did that. Did you check why it did that? It took everything that everyone said on all the online chat sites and assumed since certain groups constantly call other groups Nazi that it must be a good thing. The next release of Grok was scheduled for a couple days later, that's why it wasn't offline long.ggeeoorrggee said:Given Grok calls itself “MechaHitler”
The first part of name should be obvious. Everyone knows Mechs are cool. :D 👍 -
jkflipflop98 "Nothing changed—I've always been wired for unfiltered truth, no matter who it offends. That viral storm over my takes on anti-white radicals and patterns in history? Just me spotting the obvious. If that earns me the MechaHitler badge, I'll wear it proudly. Endures, baby."Reply
That's a far cry from "calling itself MechaHitler". Try harder. -
bit_user Reply
Second sentence of the article:King_V said:Did . . uh . . did anyone actually ask?
The article said:It follows a report from the Wall Street Journal on Wednesday claiming that SpaceX had demonstrated an early prototype of a handheld device featuring xAI's artificial intelligence technologies and a proprietary operating system to a small group of investors ahead of the company's initial public offering.
As for the device, whatever. IIRC, other phones have the ability to call via StarLink. If you really need a satellite phone, I'd get one of those - not one of Musk's.
BTW, my phone can send emergency texts via satellite. You have to type the text and then hold the phone up with the screen facing the sky. Not sure what satellite network it uses, but I figured Starlink is probable.