Industry coalition urges Trump administration to take urgent action as AI data centers' extreme memory consumption threatens other industries — AI-driven memory chip shortage could raise prices in automotive, medical, telecommunications sectors

Samsung DRAM
(Image credit: Samsung)

A coalition of nine US trade associations has urged the Trump administration to take immediate action on what it describes as an emerging memory chip shortage driven by the explosive growth of AI data centers. In a June 3 letter sent to US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent shared with Tom's Hardware, the organizations — representing telecommunications providers, automakers, medical device manufacturers, and major retailers — warned that AI infrastructure deployments are consuming an outsized share of global memory production, creating supply constraints and price increases that could ripple across large segments of the US economy.

The coalition warned that the AI data center expansion, which has consumed an unprecedented share of global memory capacity, has led to a memory chip shortage that could lead to higher prices for consumer electronics, increased costs for broadband and telecommunications infrastructure, disruptions to automobile and medical device production, and delays affecting federal contractors attempting to fulfill government procurement obligations. The letter argues that these risks are emerging despite billions of dollars of US investment intended to strengthen domestic semiconductor supply chains.

The signatories acknowledged AI's importance but argue it shouldn't come at the expense of the rest of the economy. "While recent developments in AI offer the promise of generational technological advances and are important for US tech leadership, we must also ensure other key industries are not negatively impacted by this disruption in the marketplace," the coalition said.

Latest Videos From

The organizations are asking the administration to work directly with memory suppliers and major chip buyers to address the imbalance. Their recommendations include accelerating expansion of memory manufacturing capacity in the United States and allied nations, using trade agreements to strengthen supply-chain resilience, ensuring adequate memory supply for non-AI industries, leveraging CHIPS Act programs where possible, and reducing regulatory barriers that may slow capacity growth.

"We urge the Administration to work with memory chipmakers and chip buyers to assess steps that can be taken to address this imbalance in the memory market and protect against harm to consumers, workers, and businesses of all sizes," the letter states.

The warning arrives as memory manufacturers increasingly prioritize high-bandwidth memory (HBM), the specialized memory used in AI accelerators from companies such as Nvidia and AMD. Demand for HBM has surged over the past two years as hyperscalers race to deploy larger AI clusters, prompting memory suppliers to devote an increasing share of their production capacity to AI-oriented products.

Samsung and SK Hynix — which together with Micron control over 95% of global DRAM production — have been diverting wafer capacity toward high-margin HBM for AI accelerators, starving the commodity DRAM and NAND markets in the process. Both companies warned in April that significant shortages will continue through at least 2027. IDC, meanwhile, has already revised its 2026 PC market forecast downward by up to 9% as a direct consequence of memory scarcity and rising prices.

Industry analysts have repeatedly warned for months that AI demand is reshaping the economics of the memory market. While memory shortages have historically been cyclical, the coalition argues that AI infrastructure spending is creating a structural shift large enough to affect industries far removed from data centers. The letter marks the first coordinated, multi-industry push for federal intervention. Whether the administration will respond — and how — remains to be seen.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Etiido Uko
News Contributor

Etiido Uko is a news contributor for Tom's Hardware covering the latest updates in big tech and the PC industry. He is a mechanical engineer and senior technical writer with over nine years of experience in documentation and reporting. He is deeply passionate about all things engineering and technology, and is an expert in gadgets, manufacturing, robotics, automotive, and aerospace.

  • hotaru251
    and nothing will happen.

    they benefit from the "ai" chugging of memory.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    The easiest thing he could do is let the Federal Reserve do its job and raise interest rates. That would cool investment in the AI buildout, and thereby free up some capacity and lower prices. Except, he hates the idea of higher interest rates, so instead we get higher inflation.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    hotaru251 said:
    and nothing will happen.
    The only possible near-term fix is a macroeconomic one. Implementing any fixes at the production level simply take too long to avoid the kind of damage the signatories are concerned about.
    Reply
  • jabliese
    "Implementing any fixes at the production level simply take too long"

    Except for increasing DDR 4 memory, which we are already seeing.
    Reply
  • ejolson
    In my opinion cars would be more useful and last longer if they relied on less computer technology.

    Said another way, the real crisis in modern economies is waste.
    Reply
  • Pierce2623
    bit_user said:
    The only possible near-term fix is a macroeconomic one. Implementing any fixes at the production level simply take too long to avoid the kind of damage the signatories are concerned about.
    They could make a near-term fix of flat out limiting the memory companies can buy. They could also hit the memory cartel hard enough to stop the cartel behavior. So far, the only time they really punished the memory cartel, it wasn’t enough to outweigh the money they gain by cartel behavior. They could even go as far as setting maximum prices per gigabit or something if they wanted. Setting a price ceiling is the only way i see to basically force the memory companies to increase capacity as fast as they possibly can or risk a major drop in revenue.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Pierce2623 said:
    They could make a near-term fix of flat out limiting the memory companies can buy.
    It's too late for that stuff. There are already supply agreements in place for the next several years.

    And, even if that weren't the case, how could you guarantee that some 3rd parties don't just buy up the additional supply and resell it to the companies that are currently buying up all the supply?

    Not to mention that most of the memory is actually manufactured in other countries, by foreign subsidiaries. Exactly how are you going to legislate them?

    Pierce2623 said:
    They could also hit the memory cartel hard enough to stop the cartel behavior.
    Last time they tried to press a court case against them for price-fixing, they the case fell apart for lack of evidence.

    Pierce2623 said:
    They could even go as far as setting maximum prices per gigabit or something if they wanted.
    Assuming anyone had the jurisdiction to set and enforce such price controls, then what would happen is:
    all the memory supply still gets bought up
    market prices are now set by scalpers, who price it even higher
    memory manufacturers don't get extra profit, so have less incentive to bring additional capacity online and have less financial buffer to see them through the next crash.
    Pierce2623 said:
    Setting a price ceiling is the only way i see to basically force the memory companies to increase capacity as fast as they possibly can or risk a major drop in revenue.
    You have to understand that there's almost nothing they can do, in the short term. It's not a question of will.
    Reply
  • chaos215bar2
    ejolson said:
    In my opinion cars would be more useful and last longer if they relied on less computer technology.

    Said another way, the real crisis in modern economies is waste.
    Is this actually a problem?

    I just went for a drive in my 13 year old car, and every bit of tech worked exactly as well as the day I bought it. My phone connected automatically and continued the podcast I was listening to. All the driving controls worked perfectly. The screens were still perfectly clear to read.

    So long as we build stuff to last and preserve people's privacy by not allowing car makers to collect and sell personal data (something my 13 year old car is literally incapable of), tech in cars is just fine.
    Reply
  • rluker5
    bit_user said:
    The easiest thing he could do is let the Federal Reserve do its job and raise interest rates. That would cool investment in the AI buildout, and thereby free up some capacity and lower prices. Except, he hates the idea of higher interest rates, so instead we get higher inflation.
    The lack of component supply should lead to lack of product supply and drive inflationary pricing.
    Maybe someone should let the Fed know. Last I heard they tend to raise rates with inflation.

    There's a small chance you remember I work in chemical manufacturing. Lately there has been a rash of delayed raw material deliveries. All 3 of the reactors I run have had some downtime due to this over the last 2 weeks.
    Penty of demand but not enough supply. These are possibly linked to the distribution fiasco going on in another part of the world. Not huge delays, a weekend here, a week there, but then other companies also have to wait for their products that come from us. Not nearly as much downtime as covid or the housing crisis (those were due to lack of demand), but a noticeable anomaly nonetheless.

    I'm only a sample size of 1 and I only brought this up because I see parallels with other industries' component shortage woes.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    jabliese said:
    Except for increasing DDR 4 memory, which we are already seeing.
    Except that there isn't increased production of DDR4 memory IC which is the important part. The only companies who would actually want to increase production are the smaller players like Winbond who don't make DDR5, but they're limited by capital. The only positive for DDR4 production is that when the big three announced they were ceasing production there was a spike in demand and prices went up which caused them to delay the wind down. This delay was long enough that it lasted into the current supply crisis so I believe none of them have actually stopped DDR4 production yet. The current pricing benefit simply comes from less demand on DDR4 than DDR5.
    Reply