Microsoft says Copilot is for entertainment purposes only, not serious use — firm pushing AI hard to consumers and businesses tells users not to rely on it for important advice

Microsoft Copilot logo on a laptop screen
(Image credit: Shutterstock)

Microsoft used to push its AI services towards its user base, especially with the launch of the Copilot+ PC, but it seems that even the company itself does not trust its creation. According to the Microsoft Copilot Terms of Use, which was updated in October last year, the AI large language model (LLM) is designed for entertainment use only, and users should not use it for important advice. While this may be a boilerplate disclaimer, it’s quite ironic given how hard the company wants people to use Copilot for business uses and has integrated it into Windows 11.

“Copilot is for entertainment purposes only. It can make mistakes, and it may not work as intended,” the document said. “Don’t rely on Copilot for important advice. Use Copilot at your own risk.” This isn’t limited to Copilot, too. Other AI LLMs have similar disclaimers. For example, xAI says “Artificial intelligence is rapidly evolving and is probabilistic in nature; therefore, it may sometimes: a) result in Output that contains “hallucinations,” b) be offensive, c) not accurately reflect real people, places or facts, or d) be objectionable, inappropriate, or otherwise not suitable for your intended purpose.”

Article continues below

While generative AI is a useful tool and can indeed increase productivity, it’s still just a tool that offers no accountability for any mistakes that it might make. Because of this, people who use it must be careful to always doubt its output and double-check its results. But even if you’re aware of the limitations of current AI technology, humans are susceptible to automation bias, wherein we tend to favor the results that machines produce and ignore data that might contradict that. AI could make this phenomenon more severe, especially as it can create results that look plausible or even true with a cursory glance.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • drea.drechsler
    Smart disclaimer, doubtlessly demanded by the legal department.

    I've used it a lot. It's fun to expose it's biases. When challenged on them it's usually pretty up-front about it too. It even agrees it's responses are frequently a reflection of the developers' biases. It's extremely insistent on framing the context of a question to be able to shape it's response to fit these biases, and very effective at it. This is where the biggest dangers lay, in my opinion.

    It's best use is a way to find and point me to web sites and articles with more reliable, authoritative and peer reviewed information, not for it's "opinions". It's far better than Google, DuckDuckGo or Bing for this since I don't have to wade through screen after screen of the worthless AI generated crap and adverts that litter their outputs.

    I think it's especially hilarious that software developers would use it to help them code though. I've found it next to worthless just for constructing a simple powershell script.
    Reply
  • TechieTwo
    Perhaps their disclaimer should apply to ALL Microsucks products???
    Reply
  • Zaranthos
    So does it make sense to install it on the taskbar by default on the Pro versions of Windows that are mostly used in business environments? Microsoft has lost its way and can't seem to focus on long term goals anymore without abandoning them or backtracking on half their plans. They screwed up desktop Windows with Windows 8 to focus on a unified Windows experience geared towards phones and tablets. Then when Windows phone was just getting really good and they were ahead of almost everyone with Windows phone desktop mode and the ability to dock your phone and do actual work they just gave up and abandoned phones altogether. Now nearly 10 years later Android is finally doing it. But Windows still pushes a UI better suited for phones or tablets than the arguably more popular desktop UI of Windows 9x, XP, or 7. Trust me, a good many users have been willing to sacrifice Windows compatibility to migrate to a variety of Linux disros like Linux Mint Cinnamon, Zorin OS, etc. Steam supporting Linux has shattered one of the last obstacles for widespread Linux adoption amongst the PC community, better gaming support for the masses.

    Even though I've used Windows 10 and 11 for years now at work and at home I still don't like the UI compared to earlier versions of Windows. Yeah there are ways to change the UI with Stardock or Open-Shell, but they can feel like a hassle to maintain or bloat added to an already bloated OS. Many of those Linux distros look better all the time, especially as Microsoft continues to shove garbage UI changes down our throats, break Windows updates, and seemingly lack any coherent plans.
    Reply
  • voyteck
    But it is borderline unusable, and I'm not only talking about how slow it is (except shortly after midnight CET, although even then it suffers from regular long freezes). I (don't) use the paid Microsoft 365 version via the app.

    The main problem for me is that I often can't use it to check my copy-editing work, since:

    1) The content can't be sex-related. (One can't even ask it in what movie Meg Ryan faked orgasm in a restaurant.)
    2) No mentions of torture or even self-inflicted pain.
    2) A character can't have a long-gone father who beat women.

    And so on...

    I couldn't even perform a grammar check of what I just wrote. Sex-related or something.
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    if its for entertainment purposes only...why the is it baked into windows and not "optional" ?
    Reply
  • ezst036
    This seems like a cognitive disconnect.

    If Copilot is entertainment only why is Microsoft so hard up to force everyone to have Copilot in their OS's and all attempts to remove it are like the borg? Resistance is futile.

    I just love the mixed messaging. Copilot is the future. Windows is going to be agentic. It's just for entertainment.
    Reply
  • Eximo
    Resume generating event.
    Reply
  • Paradoxides
    My experience of using Copilot(mandated by corporate) is that its responses are insistent about their correctness with absolute certainty, yet nine times out of ten require repeated follow-up to find the actual correct answer.

    It substitutes for precision with excessive verbosity, providing often both inappropriate answers and answers that prioritize a particular viewpoint(not mine), even when my question should eliminate those responses by the question's specificity.

    In otherwords, it is exhausting to use in a professional environment.

    I much prefer Claude and will continue to use Claude on the sly.
    Reply
  • Dntknwitall
    This is all AI LLMs none of this should be taken seriously and it shows the big play on AI. AI is junk and is only going to destroy the way people think and do regular everyday tasks in a negative way. People need to stop their reliance on this and start thinking for themselves and stop using AI for the tough thinking in their lives as it is only going to dumb down the major population and that is already becoming a major problem without AI.
    Reply
  • Plurality
    "Copilot may include advertising."
    Don't remember that being announced...
    Reply