Nvidia's new Synthetic Video Detector can identify fake AI videos with up to 92% accuracy — microservice based on cutting-edge research looks to combat misinformation in broadcasts with just 22ms processing time

NVIDIA AI for Media Helps Newsrooms Detect Synthetic Video
(Image credit: Nvidia)

We live in an age where artificial intelligence increasingly dominates the internet, making it harder to distinguish real content from fake news. Any picture or video you see today could be AI-generated and the traditional markers that would give it away are fading rapidly. There are tools that help identify if something has been made with AI, and Nvidia — arguably the main beneficiary of the AI race — has just released its own, called the "Synthetic Video Detector" (SVD).

SVD is an Nvidia Inference Microservice (NIM) part of the company's AI for Media Private Access Program, so it's not publicly available to consumers, but a demo exists. Anyhow, SVD's job is simple: detect whether a video is real or if was generated using AI. It can analyze videos at scale, breaking them down frame-by-frame to spot anomalies. It's based on cutting-edge research that won awards at computer vision conference ICCV.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Hassam Nasir
Contributing Writer

Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.

  • loosik
    A small tip, mostly for medicine related news, but it is good rule of thumb for tech news like this one too. If someone gives a *single* number for accuracy you can just ignore it, simple as that. Actual research produces (at least) 2 numbers, for example:
    Sensitivity (true positive rate)
    Specificity (true negative rate)For a silly example - an AI video detector that returns "yeah, it is AI" for every video has 0% false negative rate, and is also completely useless, due to its 100% false positive rate. Well, maybe not useless, I can get any "accuracy" I want depending on number of videos I put in test set.
    Reply