OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra model autonomously completes Portal in 24 hours — feat cost just $571 in tokens

Portal
(Image credit: Valve, Steam)

An AI and LLM enthusiast has conducted an experiment where OpenAI's new GPT-6 Astra played through the entirety of Valve's Portal 3D puzzler game on its own. This seems like a remarkably progressive step forward for LLMs and a convincing demonstration of multimodal 'AI intelligence.' It wasn’t that long ago AIs were losing at Atari 2600 chess. However, this puzzle gaming task resulted in 3,336 tool calls and a headline API cost of $571.18. CozyBlaze, the enthusiast, has since clarified that the costs were covered by their $200 Codex Pro subscription.

GPT-6 Astra Plays Portal - YouTube GPT-6 Astra Plays Portal - YouTube
Watch On
Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Mark Tyson
News Editor

Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.

  • usertests
    It takes many tens of thousands of dollars (depending on standard of living) to raise a baby to adulthood, so this is a good result.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    usertests said:
    It takes many tens of thousands of dollars (depending on standard of living) to raise a baby to adulthood, so this is a good result.
    Why is this a 'good result'?
    Are humans creating games just for an AI entity to solve them?
    Reply
  • Dementoss
    This is still far from true intelligence and, just an AI agent executing a long list of instructions.
    Reply
  • n3rdi
    When asked for comment after completing the game, the AI simply asked, "When is the sequel going to be released?"
    Reply
  • alrighty_then
    That's a nice achievement. How long till someone opens a Steam account for their AI and has it beat every game and get every reward, just because? Less than years away...
    Reply
  • killerbishop
    So, did the LLM have access to the Portal strategy guide, images of how to solve the puzzles, or any other data that it had previous training from? If so, this becomes less convincing that the AI solved the puzzle solely by observation. The use of MCP commands might help it know what commands to input, but if it just map those to gamefaqs, I'm not sure this is that much of a leap in novel learning capabilities.
    Reply
  • Findecanor
    Now you're thinking with portals massive datacentres.
    Reply
  • Fox2Fox2
    usertests said:
    It takes many tens of thousands of dollars (depending on standard of living) to raise a baby to adulthood, so this is a good result.
    If you're going there, you have to include the billions spent training the model.
    Reply
  • Fox2Fox2
    killerbishop said:
    So, did the LLM have access to the Portal strategy guide, images of how to solve the puzzles, or any other data that it had previous training from? If so, this becomes less convincing that the AI solved the puzzle solely by observation. The use of MCP commands might help it know what commands to input, but if it just map those to gamefaqs, I'm not sure this is that much of a leap in novel learning capabilities.
    Yes, undeniably it would have. The likelihood of multiple online guides for a game as popular as Portal being in the models dataset is almost guaranteed, at least for a model the size of Astra. It's pretty much unavoidable.
    Reply
  • Johnpombrio
    Smarter than me, as I have never finished Portal, heh.
    Reply