Over 80% of companies report no productivity gains from AI so far despite billions in investment, survey suggests — 6,000 executives also reveal 1/3 of leaders use AI, but only for 90 minutes a week

AI productivity graph
(Image credit: Getty Images)

AI is the buzzword of the era, and, much like the enthusiasm of the early dot-com years, billions of dollars worth of investment is being plowed into tools for workers aimed at improving productivity and cutting employment costs. Unfortunately, a new survey of over 6,000 executives from firms across Europe and the US shows that the majority believe AI has had little impact on their business operations so far.

That’s despite a belief among the majority of those questioned that AI will boost productivity by 1.4%, reduce headcount by 0.7%, and increase output by 0.8% over the next three years. Among the executives themselves, a third of those surveyed reported using AI in the workplace, but the usage amounted to only 1.5 hours per week on average. A quarter of those surveyed didn’t use AI at all – at least, not yet.

Article continues below

The contrast between the adoption of AI and its impact on business is an interesting callback to the challenges of decades past, where the introduction of the microcomputer radically changed how businesses operated. The so-called Solow’s productivity paradox, named after the economist who spotted the trend, saw that the extra admin caused by information overload created by computers actually slowed productivity among workers between the 1970s and 1980s. Productivity growth was steady at 2.9% between 1948 to 1973, but dropped to 1.1% afterwards, with improvements not seen again until the late 1990s and early 2000s. Similarly, a recent AI survey revealed that AI usage could actually increase burnout in employees.

Regardless, AI is continuing to prove to be an epoch-making disruptive technology that the executive class has firmly embraced, with AI firms capturing 61% of global venture capital investment in 2025, totalling $258.7 billion. Meanwhile, companies like Microsoft continue to go all-in on AI, with Microsoft's AI boss believing the technology can replace all white-collar jobs within 18 months.

The contradiction – and optimism – among execs proves that AI in the workplace is firmly entrenched, but only time will tell as to whether it has the positive impact that they, and the economy on the whole, will be hoping for.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Ben Stockton
Deals Writer

Ben Stockton is a deals writer at Tom’s Hardware. He's been writing about technology since 2018, with bylines at PCGamesN, How-To Geek, and Tom’s Guide, among others. When he’s not hunting down the best bargains, he’s busy tinkering with his homelab or watching old Star Trek episodes.

  • lejeczek
    It is going to be Biblical - like a flood - will wipe out ~90% of their business, when it bursts.
    All that big AI shenanigans - they'll be gone with the wind but also hardware manufacturers with regards to consumer market, in next ~4 yrs - I think they know it, secretly, so they shout: buy ! buy now!
    Reply
  • DS426
    Those are pretty dismal numbers for early 2026 -- I actually expected a little better.

    ROI kaputt.
    Reply
  • Marlin1975
    lejeczek said:
    It is going to be Biblical - like a flood - will wipe out ~90% of their business, when it bursts.
    All that big AI shenanigans - they'll be gone with the wind but also hardware manufacturers with regards to consumer market, in next ~4 yrs - I think they know it, secretly, so they shout: buy ! buy now!


    And yet they are still doubling down expanding, buying all the memory/gpus that can get, and even taking out large billion dollar loans to pay for it.

    So all the large banks are deeply tied into this mess. So this will be hugh when it pops.
    Only question is do they get a bail out?
    Reply
  • ejolson
    I think short-term return-on-investment expectations among decision makers at major corporations is a fundamental problem much bigger than AI.

    At the same time, I want my prices back on RAM and Flash.
    Reply
  • King_V
    Color me unsurprised.

    Don't get me wrong, early on, I might've wondered at the possibilities. But, the over-hype, the AI everywhere, the frenzy, turning it into a buzzword so overused that it's worse than an annoying song that gets played everywhere you turn, it almost feels like desperation.
    Reply
  • S58_is_the_goat
    Jensen: no guys it will get better, trust me. Keep buying my gpus...
    Reply
  • Kindaian
    Last year I brought some SSDs: 1TB and 4TB. In 8 months, the 4TB SSD increased in price 50% and the 1TB 33%.

    My NAS is on diet now.
    Reply
  • Eximo
    I would hope most of them are still in the early stages of feeling out whether the AI makes a productivity difference, before actually laying off staff and then finding out the AI can't do it reliably.

    I think they are all a bit pre-mature in such investment. But the first corporation in a market segment that makes it work is likely to destroy the competition on running costs.

    I'm not saying that is what will happen, but it is the fear all of them have.

    It is the AI hardware suppliers who stand to make the real money as well, success or failure. They have consumer electronics to always fall back on. Those that over leverage on AI infrastructure and can't find a profitable use for it might be in trouble. But it is also a utilitarian thing, that much compute can always be turned to some task.
    Reply
  • vanadiel007
    The gain is not in productivity, but in hardware sales.
    You would think all these smart CEO's would have figured this out by now...
    Reply
  • palladin9479
    Products show negligible gains but regardless guy's it's the future! Just Trust Me!

    /s
    Reply