US judge sides with Anthropic, says company supply chain risk branding over Pentagon disagreement 'Orwellian' — Trump slapped AI company with designation after it refused to lower its guardrails for the military
U.S. courts say that the federal government cannot treat companies that disagrees with it this way.
A U.S. court has sided with Anthropic and is temporarily blocking the Pentagon from calling the company a supply chain risk. The ruling comes after the AI tech company sued the Department of War for designating it as such, after the military’s demand to bypass the firm’s AI safety policies was refused. According to the Associated Press, the U.S. government argues that it should be able to use the AI tool in any way it deems lawful, but U.S. District Judge Rita Lin said that her ruling was not about how the Pentagon wanted to use Claude, but its response when Anthropic refused to give in to the department’s demands.
“Nothing in the governing statute supports the Orwellian notion that an American company may be branded a potential adversary and saboteur of the U.S. for expressing disagreement with the government,” Judge Lin wrote in her decision. She also added, “If the concern is the integrity of the operational chain of command, the Department of War could just stop using Claude. Instead, these measures appear designed to punish Anthropic.”
This issue stemmed from Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei’s refusal to allow the use of Claude for mass domestic surveillance and fully autonomous weapons. Amodei said that the government can purchase information on the average American from data broken and then use AI to turn all these data points into one cohesive profile without requiring a warrant, and that he wouldn’t allow his company’s tool to be party to that operation. Aside from that, he said that AI isn’t ready to be deployed in fully autonomous weapons because it cannot make judgments like humans. “We will not knowingly provide a product that puts America’s warfighters and civilians at risk,” the Anthropic chief said.
Article continues belowThe company’s decision to go against the Pentagon’s demand brought the ire of U.S. President Donald Trump. “THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WILL NEVER ALLOW A RADICAL LEFT, WOKE COMPANY TO DICTATE HOW OUR GREAT MILITARY FIGHTS AND WINS WARS,” Trump posted on his platform. He also wrote, “Therefore, I am directing EVERY Federal Agency in the United States Government to IMMEDIATELY CEASE all of Anthropic’s technology.”
Still, the company is fighting back, filing cases against the administration and arguing that the “supply chain risk” designation violated its First Amendment rights and also did not give Anthropic due process. Judge Rita Lin’s decision is a win for the company, but it isn’t over for Anthropic, as this is just a temporary block. Aside from that, the company also has another case filed against the government waiting to be heard in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
"The Constitution does not allow the government to wield its enormous power to punish a company for its protected speech," Anthropic said in its court filing. But in the meantime, OpenAI has struck a deal with the Pentagon to deploy its AI models on the military’s classified network.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.
-
VizzieTheViz good for anthropic but I’m afraid of how this will turn out if it reaches the Supreme Court.Reply
Seems all too obvious that the government can’t be allowed to try to extort companies into doing their bidding, but you never know these days. -
Kindaian There are laws in place for just that. And I believe the tariffs thing was done under those laws and shot down.Reply -
hotaru251 Reply
and also did not give Anthropic due process
that means nothing atm as its been violated multiple times even against SCOTUS's judgement. -
VizzieTheViz Reply
Yeah and how many companies have had the tariffs refunded? SCOTUS just left out the remedy part of the judgment.Kindaian said:There are laws in place for just that. And I believe the tariffs thing was done under those laws and shot down.
How may companies that went bankrupt will get damages? How many people that have paid way too much for stuff will get any money back at all?
Honestly believing the rule of law will protect you in the US nowadays is just plain silly. Maybe, just maybe scotus will eventually give the administration a slap on the wrist now and then too make themselves look slightly less corrupt, but you’ll be spending months in a foreign prison for being the wrong color before they do. If they do it at all. -
Why_Me That article in the OP leaves out the fact that the current US administration wants to cut ties with Anthropic yet this judge who nobody voted for is forcing US govt agencies including the US military to use Anthropic. SCOTUS will side with the current US administration and rightfully so.Reply -
Notton Reply
SCOTUS judges are also not something you get to vote on.Why_Me said:That article in the OP leaves out the fact that the current US administration wants to cut ties with Anthropic yet this judge who nobody voted for is forcing US govt agencies including the US military to use Anthropic. SCOTUS will side with the current US administration and rightfully so.
They are nominated, confirmed, and appointed. -
Why_Me Reply
Who in their right mind would want some nobody judge forcing the US military to use a non complying AI company?Notton said:SCOTUS judges are also not something you get to vote on.
They are nominated, confirmed, and appointed. -
bill001g Hard to tell on this one. Is it political and because trump said some then the judge automatically tries to block it or is it because she is based out of san fransico and so is the companyReply
This is almost stupid because there are many AI product that the government can use/misuse. It is highly likely there are top secret ones developed by the government itself.
The companies claim is silly. They don't want to military misusing their product for weapon systems and when the government says OK then we will ban the use of your product because that is what we wanted to do with it. What the company want is the government to pay them for a product that does not meet their needs...no matter if you agree with what they say they need or not. -
Syntaximus ReplyWhy_Me said:That article in the OP leaves out the fact that the current US administration wants to cut ties with Anthropic yet this judge who nobody voted for is forcing US govt agencies including the US military to use Anthropic. SCOTUS will side with the current US administration and rightfully so.Why_Me said:Who in their right mind would want some nobody judge forcing the US military to use a non complying AI company?
You're eschewing the actual issue, which is ruling on whether something is / isn't Constitutional.
That's the point of this case, and what a Federal judge should 100% be doing per our legal system's design.