More than 30,000 Samsung union members take to the streets to demand an average bonus of $400,000 per worker — May 21 strike date looms, union points to rival SK hynix granting higher bonuses to its employees
Samsung chip fab workers want a slice of the company's massive AI-driven profits.
Thousands of Samsung workers took to the streets today outside the company’s main chip fab, demanding a greater share of AI profits. According to the police, some 30,000 people attended the rally in Pyeongtaek, South Korea, more than 30 miles south of Seoul, while organizers claimed that over 39,000 were present. Bloomberg reports that the Samsung labor union wants 15% of the company’s operating profit to be shared with chip-division workers and to remove the 50% bonus cap, as well as a 7% increase in pay. If this bonus is approved, that would amount to $27 billion (more than KRW 40 trillion), averaging more than $400,000 per worker.
However, it seems that this might be a bit too much for Samsung management. It made a counteroffer of a 10% allocation of operating profit to bonuses, a 6.2% wage increase, and additional benefits like preferential mortgage loans. The union has apparently rejected this proposal, pointing out that rival SK hynix has allocated 10% of its annual operating profit for performance bonuses and also removed the maximum bonus limit for its workers. The Samsung workers argue that their bonuses only equate to less than 30% of what comparable SK hynix workers get.
While Samsung has fallen behind its homegrown rival when it came to HBM3 dominance, it has since caught up after it became the first company to deliver next-generation HBM4 chips. “The company has spoken of crisis every year,” Samsung labor union head Choi Seung-ho told the publication. “But in the midst of those crises, it was not management that sustained Samsung Electronics. It was the employees here — the union members — who made the company the world’s leading semiconductor producer, who manufactured, improved processes, worked through the night, and raised yields.”
If the two parties fail to resolve the issue, the union says it will conduct an 18-day general strike starting May 21. This massive number of workers walking out of the posts will cause massive disruption for the company, with TradingKey estimating losses of around US$20.3 billion (around KRW 20 trillion). “Samsung will continue to make efforts to reach a swift agreement in wage negotiations,” a company spokesperson told Bloomberg.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.
-
GenericUser2001 I will give the union credit for being smart about pay demands; demanding lots of money when the company is doing well and pulling heavy profits is the sensible time to do so. A lot smarter than the unions that don't do anything until a business is faltering and laying people off, and then they think its a good time to strike.Reply -
ezst036 This is a massive show of greed.Reply
All of these current profits are temporary. Their contracts are based on stable longer term company performance.
They are actively working to get future people fired because of this once stability returns and all of this temporary AI-driven memory demand goes away. The workforce is going to be too big comparative to their payscales and known realistic DRAM sales.
Contracts should always be written in light of stable times to protect everybody's jobs. -
RealityChex These people are why modern labor unions shouldn't exist at all!Reply
US $400,000 bonus isn't enough?
If they are willing to pay into the company during hard/slow times, they may have an argument. As it is, they want all of the benefits of success, but none of the risks of failure. -
sftwn Very proud of the union for doing this. For those that think it's unfair because it somehow risks future jobs, it shouldn't. (Is this based on the idea the company will keep the excess cash on hand?)Reply
That money will immediately be either reinvested or, more likely, paid out as executive bonuses. It's not greedy for the hands that run the machine to get their piece of the pie too. Good on them! -
jabliese Reply
You skipped the 50% cap. Bonus is capped at 50% of their current paycheck. I imagine most of Samsung's employees do not make 800,000 a year, so most of them will not get a 400k bonus.RealityChex said:These people are why modern labor unions shouldn't exist at all!
US $400,000 bonus isn't enough?
If they are willing to pay into the company during hard/slow times, they may have an argument. As it is, they want all of the benefits of success, but none of the risks of failure. -
Co BIY Replyezst036 said:This is a massive show of greed.
All of these current profits are temporary. Their contracts are based on stable longer term company performance.
They are actively working to get future people fired because of this once stability returns and all of this temporary AI-driven memory demand goes away. The workforce is going to be too big comparative to their payscales and known realistic DRAM sales.
Contracts should always be written in light of stable times to protect everybody's jobs.
They and management and the shareholders should "make hay while the sun shines". Save some of your money for the future but relying on forced promises from the company to do the impossible in the future would be foolish.
They are "Hollywood Stars" who should make as much as they can while they are in demand and save for a future when they won't be the world's darling.
I noticed that management didn't really say "We can't afford it", "It's unsustainable" or even "we need the cash to invest for the future of the company". They say that stuff if they can.
Contracts shouldn't be written for "stable times" if they are unlikely to exist. Memory has been boom and bust from the beginning of the industry. -
Notton Reply
Yeah, except Samsung is the #1 Chaebol, aka big business, Zaibatsu, Megacorp.ezst036 said:This is a massive show of greed.
All of these current profits are temporary. Their contracts are based on stable longer term company performance.
They are actively working to get future people fired because of this once stability returns and all of this temporary AI-driven memory demand goes away. The workforce is going to be too big comparative to their payscales and known realistic DRAM sales.
Contracts should always be written in light of stable times to protect everybody's jobs.
They have their own bank, insurance, hospital, R&D facilities, heavy weapons manufacturing, on top of electronics. That's not even the full list.
They pretty much own and operate South Korea.
Samsung profits wouldn't even take a dent with a $12,000,000,000 payout to its employees. Especially when you consider Samsung owns everything and the employees would likely spend their money at Samsung in one form or another anyways.