SpaceX unveils 11-million-square-foot Gigasat factory, a new manufacturing facility for space-based data centers — aims for 1 GW/year of space AI compute by late 2027 from its satellites

SpaceX Gigasat factory
SpaceX Gigasat factory (Image credit: SpaceX)

SpaceX has announced a new 11-million-square-foot Gigasat factory in Bastrop, Texas, dedicated to building the infrastructure needed to achieve the company's orbital data center goal. In an internally conducted interview posted on X on June 8, SpaceX CEO Elon Musk confirmed that the facility is expected to begin producing complete "AI satellites" by 2027. The company is targeting 1 gigawatt (GW) of orbital AI compute capacity by the end of next year, with plans to scale that figure by an order of magnitude annually thereafter.

During the interview, Musk unveiled the build and specs of the proposed AI1 satellite, the company’s take on orbital data centers. The satellite will span roughly 70 meters (229.66 feet), with a massive solar array — generating power at a density of 250 W/m² — making up the bulk of the structure. AI1 will also feature vertically oriented, double-sided radiators for cooling, with the 150-kilowatt (kW) peak compute payload positioned right in the middle of the structure.

The massive 11-million-square-foot Gigasat facility — more than ten times larger than Starfactory, SpaceX's current largest spacecraft manufacturing complex — will vertically integrate much of the AI1 satellite supply chain on a single campus. The facility will manufacture solar ingots and wafers, solar cells, printed circuit boards (PCBs), silicon-based electronic components, user terminals, gateways, and the AI1 satellites themselves. The 1,000-acre site will also include dedicated satellite development and testing facilities, warehousing and logistics infrastructure, and a large-scale AI satellite production line.

Latest Videos From

According to Musk, the solar manufacturing facilities are already under construction, while the AI satellite production building is about to break ground. SpaceX expects to be producing a "reasonable volume" of these orbital data centers by the end of 2027. While each satellite will carry 150 kW of compute power, the company aims to achieve 1 GW per year of space AI compute in that same time. That would mean launching on the order of more than 6,000 AI1 satellites in a single year. For context, Starlink has about 10,500 active satellites as of June 2026.

Musk hopes to scale to 100 GW per year by 2030 and even has eyes on Terrawatt-level computing, completely solar-powered in space. "This is what we are going to try to do and think we probably can do, which is to get to roughly an annualized rate of a gigawatt per year by the end of next year at Space AI compute. And then aspirationally, scale that by an order of magnitude per year. So in two and a half years, hitting an annualized rate of 10 gigawatts a year at Space. And three and a half years, maybe 100 gigawatts," he said, while also expressing a desire to one day scale to a terawatt per year, depending on progress in chip making.

The largest AI data center anyone has actually announced is Meta's Hyperion in Louisiana, designed to scale up to 5 GW and house roughly 2 million GPUs at full buildout, at over $100 billion — and even that only reaches its first 2 GW phase by 2030. xAI's own Colossus 2 in Memphis just expanded to nearly 2 GW of capacity, with 555,000 GPUs, for about $18 billion, making it the world's largest single-site AI installation. So 100 GW/year is approximately 20 Hyperions or 50 Colossus-2s per year.

Achieving this will take an unprecedented volume of chips, and Musk's answer is Terafab — a SpaceX/Tesla/xAI venture in Austin aiming to fab 1 terawatt of compute a year, roughly 100 to 200 million advanced chips, in a 100-million-square-foot plant. However, the project itself is being met with widespread skepticism. For starters, none of the three companies has ever made a chip, yet they're starting at the bleeding-edge 2nm node. Our in-depth Terafab industry analysis explores various other reasons why this skepticism is valid.

Multi-Gigawatt ambitions aside, Gigastat is a significant step towards orbital data center goals that are increasingly seen as a potential viable solution to the extreme power consumption of on-ground data centers. Not unexpectedly, SpaceX is leading the race. Manufacturing solar arrays, wiring, and satellite bodies at volume is largely conventional work — much of it built on technology SpaceX already produces for its Starlink V3 satellites, just at far greater scale — which is part of why a 2027 production start is credible.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Etiido Uko
News Contributor

Etiido Uko is a news contributor for Tom's Hardware covering the latest updates in big tech and the PC industry. He is a mechanical engineer and senior technical writer with over nine years of experience in documentation and reporting. He is deeply passionate about all things engineering and technology, and is an expert in gadgets, manufacturing, robotics, automotive, and aerospace.

  • Findecanor
    I'm calling it. The factory is not for space-based AI data centres — as that would be insane.
    The factory can only be for something more sinister.

    Don't forget that the real-world counterpart to Hank Scorpio is in charge. The guy that ran DOGE. The guy who did a Nazi salute at Trump's inauguration. A long-term associate with Peter Thiel.
    Reply
  • usertests
    It's for turning naggers into Soylent Green. Millions a year can be processed in a facility of this size.
    Reply
  • FunSurfer
    Well, If you ever wondered what the aliens are using those Dyson spheres for...
    Reply
  • COLGeek
    As a reminder, civility is required by all members, all of the time.
    Reply
  • blppt
    "Don't forget that the real-world counterpart to Hank Scorpio is in charge. The guy that ran DOGE. The guy who did a Nazi salute at Trump's inauguration. A long-term associate with Peter Thiel."

    At least Hank Scorpio was nice to his employees.
    Reply
  • Zaranthos
    The Nazi salute thing has been repeatedly debunked. Quit believing the same stupid people who apparently lie for a living while claiming to be media outlets...

    If you repeatedly watch the same out of context brief media clip you're obviously not "well informed".
    Reply
  • Sluggotg
    Findecanor said:
    I'm calling it. The factory is not for space-based AI data centres — as that would be insane.
    The factory can only be for something more sinister.

    Don't forget that the real-world counterpart to Hank Scorpio is in charge. The guy that ran DOGE. The guy who did a Nazi salute at Trump's inauguration. A long-term associate with Peter Thiel.
    Please keep Politics out of these forums. There are plenty of sites out there where you can express your political opinions. This is for Tech discussions.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    This is little more than hype, right before SpaceX's big IPO. It's supposed to be the largest IPO in history and it seems they're pulling out all the stops to try and convince investors to join.
    Reply
  • purposelycryptic
    bit_user said:
    This is little more than hype, right before SpaceX's big IPO. It's supposed to be the largest IPO in history and it seems they're pulling out all the stops to try and convince investors to join.
    Everything about this IPO feels like a massive deathtrap; it's just red flag after red flag after red flag... The more I read, the more I felt the need to ensure I have as little money as possible going that way. I am so glad the S&P 500 isn't fast tracking them, as I have a not-insignificant amount of money in an ETF that tracks it.
    Reply
  • blppt
    Zaranthos said:
    The Nazi salute thing has been repeatedly debunked. Quit believing the same stupid people who apparently lie for a living while claiming to be media outlets...

    If you repeatedly watch the same out of context brief media clip you're obviously not "well informed".
    How exactly was it debunked? Even Elon himself never directly addressed it.
    Regardless, the only plausible excuse I've heard is that he was coked up to the gills that day. (or ketamine in his case).
    Do I think he'd be stupid enough to do that if he actually was a 'true believer'? No, but again he was having some very obvious drug problems around that time, rumored to be one of the reasons he was eventually kicked out of his government position.
    Being inebriated can cause people to expose things about themselves otherwise under wraps.
    Reply