Japanese authorities use new tool to identify initial torrent uploaders — anti-piracy group says it identified seeder on popular anime torrenting website without torrent swarm monitoring

Torrent links
(Image credit: Getty Images)

Recently, the Kyoto Prefectural Police caught one of the initial-seeders of the well-known Japanese torrent website Nyaa. Masakazu Ono, 56, from Sagamihara in the Kamigawa Prefecture, was arrested after a multi-year investigation. While this news is straightforward by itself, the interesting bit is that CODA, the Japanese anti-piracy entity that performed the initial cyber-investigation, identified Ono allegedly without joining or monitoring BitTorrent swarm traffic, with the help of the Japan Hacker Association (JHA).

CODA's description of only having "[analyzed] how data moves through torrent sites, such as index sites and tracker sites" is vague and can be parsed in a number of ways. The distinction between indexer and tracker is relevant: while an indexer is a user-visible list of torrents (usually a website), the tracker is the background service that software like qBittorrent actually connects to, and it lists everyone who's currently active in that torrent, whether sharing, downloading, or both.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Bruno Ferreira
Contributor

Bruno Ferreira is a contributing writer for Tom's Hardware. He has decades of experience with PC hardware and assorted sundries, alongside a career as a developer. He's obsessed with detail and has a tendency to ramble on the topics he loves. When not doing that, he's usually playing games, or at live music shows and festivals.

  • ThatMouse
    Isn't it pretty easy when you don't use a VPN?
    Reply
  • edzieba
    well-known Japanese torrent website Nyaa
    The various Nyaa clones following the collapse of the original may be many things, but none of them are operated from Japan (nor was the original, for that matter).
    ThatMouse said:
    Isn't it pretty easy when you don't use a VPN?
    The key was the method used to identify a swarm member without actually directly interacting with the swarm (i.e. without actively participating in material distribution).
    Reply
  • nameless0ne
    Yup - VPN was definitely not involved. Whatever method they used - they got a lot of data on all connections and peers. They've performed a statistical analysis and selected the most prominent / earliest seeders and went after the domestic ones.
    Reply