30 Georgia homes are being acquired via sale or eminent domain to expand power grid — one affected family member says it’s ‘for the data centers’
Georgia Power denies the allegation, says it’s ‘not in the data center business.’
The largest utility company in Georgia is conducting a massive upgrade of its grid, and part of this project requires the connecting its Ashley Park Substation to Plant Wansley, which is currently undergoing an upgrade. The 35-mile stretch between the two facilities will go through Fayette, Heard, Fulton, and Coweta Counties, and require the removal of 30 residential properties along its path, reports Fortune. This included Ansley Brown’s family home, who took to Instagram to share her story.
A post shared by Ansley Brown (@ansleysgarden)
A photo posted by on
“Georgia Power is forcibly taking people’s homes, okay? They have no choice in this matter,” Brown said in her IG post. “As you can see behind me, these are the power lines, and this is my childhood home. My childhood home is being taken by Georgia Power — they’re going to bulldoze this entire property to the ground. We don’t have a choice in this. They’re going to be expanding these power lines. Why? For the data centers. All of this is for the data centers.”
Thankfully, her family was able to get in touch with their representative, Brian Jack (R-GA), who sent people on the ground to take stock of the situation and connected the two parties. Brown said in her last update that they’ve already settled with Georgia Power, with the company telling Fortune that the family has agreed to a settlement for an undisclosed amount.
A post shared by Ansley Brown (@ansleysgarden)
A photo posted by on
While this ended up on a somewhat positive note for the family, this is an example of what one report previously warned about government using eminent domain to seize land for the AI infrastructure build out. Georgia Power isn’t exactly building the transmission line to connect a power plant directly to a data center, but AI data centers’ massive power demands have caused massive opposition to projects like this to appear nationwide. It also doesn’t help that an AI data center, which is being accused of secretly using up 29 million gallons of water, sits less than five miles to the southwest of the substation.
The current administration has been pushing for AI data centers, believing that it needs all that infrastructure so it can win the “AI race” against China. However, the U.S. power grid is sorely lagging behind its Asian rival, meaning U.S. power utilities and electricity providers are spending billions of dollars to upgrade the grid. This, in turn, is being passed on to every power consumer, which is heavily affecting the average American. President Donald Trump instituted and expanded the “ratepayer protection pledge” in attempt to control the spiraling costs.
California has been trying to pass a law that will codify these promises, but the same tech companies that signed the pledge are also reportedly lobbying against the bill. At the moment, Oregon is the only state that has a regulation that forces big consumers (like data centers) to pay their fair share, with industries using 20MW or more getting slapped with a 30% increase in their power bill while residents and commercial users get their costs slashed by 1.3%.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.
-
hwertz Well it's been in the tech news recently that Oracle is being expected to cough up $3 billion in Wisconsin, it's not a direct rate increase for them and decrease for others but rather they must fund the grid and generation capacity for their data center rather than pushing it onto all rate holders.Reply -
alrighty_then Data center & AI media coverage reminds me of Trump running for president. Nothing but negative coverage, yet it still wins. I don't know why people bother writing such stories. There are no positive AI stories but maybe because that's not even news anymore?!Reply -
Gururu Reply
I'd love to hear about the silver linings too. I am really at a loss at how AI and data centers are going to make my cost of living manageable and my family's life generally safer and more comfortable.alrighty_then said:Data center & AI media coverage reminds me of Trump running for president. Nothing but negative coverage, yet it still wins. I don't know why people bother writing such stories. There are no positive AI stories but maybe because that's not even news anymore?! -
PowerEngineer This is really irresponsible journalism and I'd expect better. A popular tech news site has a responsibility to clarify technical issues in a way the average person can understand. This article points to a young person implying something on social media and a 5 mile proximity to a data center as evidence that this line is caused by data center. That is almost nothing. Is the line even closely networked to the data center? These could be two disconnected radial systems for all we know. If a line is already getting easements, it's likely been being studied for a few years now. Which was proposed first, the transmission line or the data center?Reply
Look the current data center build out deserves skepticism and careful watching, but scaremongering about necessary infrastructure improvements is irresponsible.
I'm not saying it's impossible they're related, but the information provided is not enough to draw that conclusion. Do better. -
Gururu Reply
Thats unfair. If you had followed the reference links you would easily have found that:PowerEngineer said:This is really irresponsible journalism and I'd expect better. A popular tech news site has a responsibility to clarify technical issues in a way the average person can understand. This article points to a young person implying something on social media and a 5 mile proximity to a data center as evidence that this line is caused by data center. That is almost nothing. Is the line even closely networked to the data center? These could be two disconnected radial systems for all we know. If a line is already getting easements, it's likely been being studied for a few years now. Which was proposed first, the transmission line or the data center?
Look the current data center build out deserves skepticism and careful watching, but scaremongering about necessary infrastructure improvements is irresponsible.
I'm not saying it's impossible they're related, but the information provided is not enough to draw that conclusion. Do better.
"Utility giant Georgia Power is planning to build a new transmission line to in part help power new data centers. It estimates 70-80% of the power on the new line will help serve data centers and the remaining 20-30% of power will serve the state's growing residential and commercial demand". -
PowerEngineer Reply
I missed that, thanks for pointing it out. I see the link to a fortune article that links to a CBS article that shows this. I still think the one piece of solid information that makes the main claim made an the article hold up to scrutitiny should be included in the article, not in a reference. That seems like a pretty reasonable standard.Gururu said:Thats unfair. If you had followed the reference links you would easily have found that:
"Utility giant Georgia Power is planning to build a new transmission line to in part help power new data centers. It estimates 70-80% of the power on the new line will help serve data centers and the remaining 20-30% of power will serve the state's growing residential and commercial demand".