Big Tech eyes glacier-strewn Patagonia for building mega AI data centers — region offers 17,300 glaciers, coldness, and cheap energy, but fiber lines are scarce

Patagonia
(Image credit: Getty)

Patagonia, a region of Argentina with 17,300 glaciers, has the potential to turn into a data center hotspot. The cool climate and abundant energy resources there are drawing interest from the likes of Amazon, Google, and OpenAI, according to Reuters. However, there needs to be more work on tapping into the resources and equipping high-speed networking, like fiber, to make the place irresistible. There’s also the question of political stability with a presidential election next year.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Mark Tyson
News Editor

Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.

  • jp7189
    Keep 'em close and keep an eye on 'em, or make it such a pain to build in the US that the logistics costs of remote locations don't look so bad anymore.
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    Global warming, here I come.....
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    TerryLaze said:
    Global warming, here I come.....
    already been here for a long time.

    this will ofc speed up glacial melting in area (even if minute amount...heat does speed up melting even if its only increase of 0.01c)
    Reply
  • warezme
    I hate to be supportive of data centers but why would they need fiber cabling at least not at onset. Infrared line of sight laser repeating stations could handle the bandwidth at least temporarily while cable is laid.
    Reply
  • RodroX
    Yeah, the heck with nature, glaciers, wild life and protected areas, AI is more important.
    Come destroy the south of my beloved country.

    They will destroy everything, president Milei wont give a shirt. He, as most politics, only care about money.

    We don't need AI, we need roads, water, gas an electricity supplies all over out country... but politics only think about money and selling what shouldn't
    Reply
  • Eximo
    warezme said:
    I hate to be supportive of data centers but why would they need fiber cabling at least not at onset. Infrared line of sight laser repeating stations could handle the bandwidth at least temporarily while cable is laid.
    Yeah, not sure those kinds of systems are just laying around to be temporarily used. More like a multi-million dollar investment, or, just paying for the cable run in the first place.

    Also depends on what the datacenter will be doing. Handling live user traffic or just sitting there running compute jobs. Theoretically, a large compute job could just be physical media in and out when you need something processed.
    Reply
  • Misgar
    ",,, some operators who are already established are also adding solar."

    Solar is fine in the middle of summer, but the sun rises at 9:59am in Ushuaia and sets at 17:11 mid winter.
    Reply
  • Tanakoi
    jp7189 said:
    Keep 'em close and keep an eye on 'em, or make it such a pain to build in the US that the logistics costs of remote locations don't look so bad anymore.
    That's what CCP China wants, certainly.

    RodroX said:
    Yeah, the heck with nature, glaciers, wild life and protected areas, AI is more important.
    Come destroy the south of my beloved country.
    These sorts of absurd claims are not only counterproductive, but outright dangerous: the idea that "nature" is pure and unspoiled, and anything man builds is inherently destructive. I do wonder, though: was your post made from underneath a tree in the wilderness, or within a "nature-destroying" building somewhere? And how did a copy of that post arrive on my own PC, without using a long nature-destroying series of 5G towers and fiberoptic cables, with a monstrously evil datacenter somewhere in the middle, storing and repeating the message?
    Reply
  • Tanakoi
    RodroX said:
    We don't need AI, we need roads, water, gas an electricity supplies all over out country...
    In my country at least, roads connect every place I wish to drive, and when I turn on a tap I get all the water I need, and when I flip a switch, I get all the electricity I desire. Those nations who lack this luxury all have one thing in common: a lack of prosperity to build that infrastructure. If AI brings that prosperity, then it's a double benefit.

    I'll also note that the use of AI is already, in fields from agriculture to shipping to construction, dramatically *reducing* the use of water, gas, electricity, and other natural resources.
    Reply
  • jp7189
    warezme said:
    I hate to be supportive of data centers but why would they need fiber cabling at least not at onset. Infrared line of sight laser repeating stations could handle the bandwidth at least temporarily while cable is laid.
    Starlink v3 are 1Tbps down/160Gbps up. Pull tons of training data down, chug on it, send back the (smaller) results.
    Reply