Jason Kelce-led marketing campaign asks beer drinkers to send their pee to AI data centers — Liquid Death and Garage Beer skit claims 'AI data centers waste millions of gallons of water'
“The suits want us to tell you to please don’t actually send your pee.”
Data centers have become a hot topic uniting Americans recently, with over 70% opposing the building of this infrastructure near their homes. So, Liquid Death and Garage Beer have banded together to create a viral ad asking viewers to drink their products, create pee, and then send it to the AI data center of their choice. According to Marketing Dive, the concept started with Liquid Death’s creative team, with comedian Sabrina Jalees coming up with the data center idea. It was repurposed into this ad, featuring NFL star Jason Kelce, who co-owns Garage Beer, showing the two brands teaming up together to promote their products and asking people to pee on computers "to save humanity."
“We have a lot of affinity for what those guys are doing: they’re doing comedy, and they’re also an indie trying to break into the mainstream. We’re positioning our energy drink as a light beer of energy — it’s fewer calories, it’s lighter, it’s more drinkable — so that was the strategy,” Liquid Death vice president of creative Andy Pearson told the publication. As for the peeing on data center concept, Pearson added that it’s the one issue that's common across America. “When you look at the data, it is literally the one thing that unites all Americans right now, across the spectrum.” In the video below, Kelce opens by stating "AI data centers waste millions of gallons of water."
Aside from electricity use and consumption pushing prices for all consumers, the next big issue that many data centers face is the amount of water that they consume in their operations. There have been several instances of data centers affecting the water supply of the neighborhood that they’re in. One example of this is this 615-acre campus in Fayetteville, which has been causing low water pressure for over 15 months as it secretly sucked 29 million gallons of water, while another report showed a Meta data center allegedly muddying the water supply in a Georgia town.
These concerns had tech giants like Microsoft and Amazon release claims that their data centers only consume a small amount of water, while Nvidia has also been developing technologies that will cut data center water use by up to 100%. Still, many feel that these efforts aren’t enough to address the issues being felt right now, leading to passionate and widespread resistance against these projects across the nation.
The two indie brands are trying to get on board the issue in a more lighthearted, less preachy way, making use of humor and a bit of crudeness to touch on sensitive issues like data centers. While the video has a disclaimer saying, “to please don’t actually send your pee,” some developments plan to use treated wastewater instead of fresh water for their water demands, so some data centers already use “pee” to cool their GPUs. We just wish that more of these facilities did this from the beginning, instead of making thousands of people suffer from water problems.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.
-
husker Given the visual similarities, no beer brand should ever want to associate their product with pee. Humor or not, advertising can be quite subliminal.Reply -
PEnns I'll drink to that!!Reply
That's one cooling for data centers many would agree with, especially in the farmlands! -
passivecool For those who value data over polemic: google some thing like 'comparison water usage data centers vs golf courses USA'Reply
and then consider how often you use the internet in comparison to how often you golf.
There is room for improvement everywhere for sure. And superior solutions must be demanded, by the locality, so that the implementation is not only shareholder value focused, but benefits the locality– not with empty promises but with hard commitments.
IMHO in most cases "yes, but..." will lead to a win-win. NIMBY creates a lot of anger and delivers zero results.
Apparently a foreign concept, it is called 'negotiation'
And yes you need to be sure about both the integrity and competency of your local representatives, who are typically vastly unqualified for this kind of negotiation. Someone will close this gap with an offer, for sure, that is the nature of capitalism. -
marmarmar34 Reply
I certainly use my computer quite a bit, but I definitely don't use AI at all. I've never ever needed a wrong-answer machine to replace previous algorithms and academic resources that I still rely on. Nowadays, I have to do even more work due to the slew of wannabe intellectuals gumming up repos with their hallucinated garbage. Even outside of that, I had my utility bills bumped up by a flat 10%! AI has been the bane of my existence, and it's only going to get worse if there isn't a cap put on this trash!passivecool said:For those who value data over polemic: google some thing like 'comparison water usage data centers vs golf courses USA'
and then consider how often you use the internet in comparison to how often you golf.
There is room for improvement everywhere for sure. And superior solutions must be demanded, by the locality, so that the implementation is not only shareholder value focused, but benefits the locality– not with empty promises but with hard commitments.
IMHO in most cases "yes, but..." will lead to a win-win. NIMBY creates a lot of anger and delivers zero results.
Apparently a foreign concept, it is called 'negotiation'
And yes you need to be sure about both the integrity and competency of your local representatives, who are typically vastly unqualified for this kind of negotiation. Someone will close this gap with an offer, for sure, that is the nature of capitalism.
There isn't any negotiation needed between these tech giants and local governing bodies. These data centers provide ZERO/ZILCH/NADA benefits to anyone that isn't in the billionaire's club, and even that is debatable. These resource sinkholes should be dug up by their roots and tossed in the trash. -
passivecool Reply
You DO understand that absolutely every aspect, every service, every functionality of the internet runs on data centers, right? Always has, always will.marmarmar34 said:I certainly use my computer quite a bit, but I definitely don't use AI at all. I've never ever needed a wrong-answer machine to replace previous algorithms and academic resources that I still rely on. Nowadays, I have to do even more work due to the slew of wannabe intellectuals gumming up repos with their hallucinated garbage. Even outside of that, I had my utility bills bumped up by a flat 10%! AI has been the bane of my existence, and it's only going to get worse if there isn't a cap put on this trash!
There isn't any negotiation needed between these tech giants and local governing bodies. These data centers provide ZERO/ZILCH/NADA benefits to anyone that isn't in the billionaire's club, and even that is debatable. These resource sinkholes should be dug up by their roots and tossed in the trash.
I do see the 'how much glue should i put on my pizza' argument regularly. All i can say is that i understand, but fact is, that the competency of AI has doubled every 7 months or so. 2024 you were talking to a 6-year-old. in AI-years (think dog years) it has now finished it's second degree.
I have no dog in this fight, no shares in anything, nothing to sell you. You seem a sensible person and a nice guy and I therefore want to invite you and others who share this understandable opinion to reconsider - in your own interest - better sooner than later.
AI is not a magic box. It is a tool. Do you expect to drive over something with an orbital sander for 30 seconds and have the result be perfect? No. it takes skill and iterations and time. A tool to learn to use properly.
Start a critical discussion with the ai results of your next google search, say what you like, what you dont why and what you want. refine your thoughts with the bot as a sparing partner. Push back and demand pushback. You will find yourself engaged with a mid-range thinking AI that can provide serious benefits and insights. If nothing else, you will afterwards clearer understand your intent.
Don't be lazy and don't give up.
Don't miss the boat, bro. -
marmarmar34 Reply
Hardly to the magnitude that AI specific data centers have. Previously well maintained databases and search/sorting algorithms required significantly less physical space, processing power, and energy input than AI infrastructure while providing an equal (if not just flat-out better) output.passivecool said:You DO understand that absolutely every aspect, every service, every functionality of the internet runs on data centers, right? Always has, always will.
Said by someone feverishly defending one of the most polarizing and politically influenced fads in the modern era. Ok bud.passivecool said:I have no dog in this fight, no shares in anything, nothing to sell you.
For who? Certainly not for the layman that simply uses it to generate lifeless images, videos, and music. Certainly not for any self respecting professional worth their salt that doesn't want to constantly sift out garbage prompts. The only people that benefit from this are the richest of the rich.passivecool said:AI is not a magic box. It is a tool.
They're strictly motivated by control, even at the expense of capital. The AI experiment has burned BILLIONS, with a capital B, of tax dollars that we can't afford to spend! And for what? Having automated spy cameras logging every single person's daily life? Profiling people at a disgustingly precise scale? Who benefits from this the most buddy? Certainly not the layman. Certainly not the victims of stalkers exploiting their access to such data.
I once had pie in the sky dreams of the possibilities of AI too. A self sufficient system able to calculate the best possible solution for problems people wouldn't have the access, or the time to solve. Self sufficient facilities in remote areas, like distant planets, able to set up a fully functional living space for future human habitation. But no, that would be too reasonable of a goal. It all leads to the worst of the worst wanting total control of everyone's life.