Local opposition blocked 45 data center projects worth $68 billion in the second quarter of 2026 — data center investments reportedly still on track to hit $32 trillion by 2050 [Updated]
Trump says opposing communities "want to end up being backwards and poor."
Edit: 8/24/2026 6:25am PT: Energy provider Entergy reached out to clarify the savings to customers outlined below, stating, "The correct number is $2.65 billion over 20 years in customer savings. This information is found in our Meta fact sheet that is publicly available at www.entergy.com/datacenters and in our press release first announcing the savings on March 27, 2026." We have corrected the story below accordingly.
Amended article follows:
Local opposition blocked or delayed $68 billion in data center projects between April and June this year, according to a September 21 Bloomberg report citing data from research group Data Center Watch. The report says 30 state houses have implemented rules on data center location and resource consumption, with communities pursuing moratoriums on planned construction even before developers apply for permits. Conversely, hyperscalers have spent over $1 trillion on data infrastructure since 2023, with an additional $745 billion in Capex expected in 2026 alone.
- The data center cooling state of play
- The custom AI ASIC state of play
- America’s AI chip rules keep changing — and the rest of the world is paying the price
- GTC 2026: Ian Buck press Q&A transcript — VP of Hyperscale and HPC speaks out on shelving CPX and shipping LPU decode this year
- Demand for data center CPUs has surged, and AI agents are responsible
The blocked-project figures reflect widespread opposition to data centers across the United States over concerns about land usage, noise pollution, and electricity and water consumption. In July this year, 142 AI data center protests were simultaneously staged across 42 states in one weekend. Data Center Watch’s research estimates that there are 843 opposition groups across all U.S. states except Hawaii.
One leading concern is the environmental impact of AI data centers. Each consume huge amounts of water to cool hundreds of thousands of accelerators powering artificial intelligence, with AI reportedly set to consume up to 600 billion gallons of water by 2030. The hyperscalers, on the other hand, insist the issue is being blown out of proportion.
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman says 38,000 ChatGPT queries use as much water as producing one almond, while Microsoft says its new data center architecture consumes as little water as a restaurant. Meanwhile, in May this year, an AI data center project secretly consumed 29 million gallons of water within a year and three months before low water pressure alerted nearby residents to its existence.
Protesters also commonly cite electricity consumption as a major concern. Analysts project that data centers will consume 20% of U.S. power by 2035. Local residents are already feeling the effects. An AI data center in Virginia led to an irreversible 76% hike in residents’ electricity bills, prompting the state to eventually mandate hyperscalers to cover the cost of the transmission infrastructure required exclusively for the project.
Many regions are now implementing similar mandates, with hyperscalers offering to offset the bills in many cases. These concerns, along with the extreme power demands of AI data centers, have also led hyperscalers to build on-site power, with some offering to supply power back to the grid. Meta, for example, recently signed an agreement with utility company Entergy Louisiana for 7 GW of power for its Hyperion facility. Entergy claims Meta's payment provide other customers with $2.65 billion in savings over 20 years.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Meanwhile, the shift to off-grid, on-site power generation is creating yet another issue driving the protests. Due to their scalability and speed of availability, many hyperscalers are relying on gas plants, which mostly burn fossil fuels to generate electricity. Elon Musk's Colossus 2 data center recently came under fire after 59 unpermitted natural gas turbines powering the data center released thousands of tons of pollutants into predominantly black communities in Mississippi. Elsewhere, Amazon’s custom 35-turbine gas plant has been authorized to emit 33 million tons of greenhouse gases annually, a move that will make it the largest single source of CO₂ pollution in the U.S.
The growing sentiments present a sort of dilemma. AI is proving to be quite the revolutionary technology and has seen massive adoption and skyrocketing usage. To meet demand, hyperscalers are erecting data centers at breakneck speed, which residents now oppose. Proponents say data centers are an absolute necessity and any opposition stifles growth.
Opponents, on the other hand, say they are only demanding responsible execution and have nothing against AI. President Trump has condemned communities that have opposed data centers, saying that they “want to end up being backwards and poor.” He has also implied that China could be behind the sentiment, orchestrating movements behind the scenes. Meanwhile, officials across the country are reportedly facing death threats and gunfire over AI data center projects, even as AI data center investments are projected to hit $32 trillion by 2050.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.
Etiido Uko is a news contributor for Tom's Hardware covering the latest updates in big tech and the PC industry. He is a mechanical engineer and senior technical writer with over nine years of experience in documentation and reporting. He is deeply passionate about all things engineering and technology, and is an expert in gadgets, manufacturing, robotics, automotive, and aerospace.
-
Rand0m_Guy Who wants to bet the people opposed to the Data Centers used their 'smart' phone or other device to voice their opposition which required a data center to work.Reply
Same people who use their ipads to post on social media that ipads sucks. LMAO! -
Daelith Reply
Those data centers tha t flourish atthe moment are mostly for AI (directly or indirectly with the data they generate).Rand0m_Guy said:Who wants to bet the people opposed to the Data Centers used their 'smart' phone or other device to voice their opposition which required a data center to work.
Same people who use their ipads to post on social media that ipads sucks. LMAO! -
Crypted Reply
Very "you criticize society, and yet you live in a society!" tier take. Most of these new data centers being built are for the imagined and also real existing demand for AI.Rand0m_Guy said:Who wants to bet the people opposed to the Data Centers used their 'smart' phone or other device to voice their opposition which required a data center to work.
Same people who use their ipads to post on social media that ipads sucks. LMAO! -
Crypted Reply
Unfortunately a lot of AI use in helpful areas comes with a lot of caveats or is exaggerated to sell an idea instead of being fully functional. There was some AI medical company that raised billions not too long ago for their revolutionary AI...that didn't even exist.rgd1101 said:ai could also use for medical and other useful. not just for chat and useless stuff
Also most of this is probably for Flock and other AI surveillance methods. -
Tanakoi And CCP China continues to fund these "grassroots" anti-datacenter and anti-AI groups and propaganda ... assisted by low IQ individuals who believe AI is "using all da water" and "stealing our jobs!"Reply -
PEnns "Trump says opposing communities "want to end up being backwards and poor."Reply
Indeed. Look at all those people who are now super intelligent and newly minted billionaires because they live in the shadows of AI centers!! -
Tanakoi "Google Datacenter transforms local schools from worst-funded to best-funded in the state; many other benefits as well"Reply
https://www.newson6.com/tulsa-oklahoma-news/pryor-public-schools-talks-impact-of-googles-data-center-on-the-district-gives-us-an-advantage -
Crypted Reply
We're at the point where you're apparently a CCP diehard communist or an idiot if you raise any legit concerns about AI and the modern surveillance state. True free thinking patriots don't question the loss of freedom and privacy, or the ties between AI groups and the feds, Peter Thiel, and Israel apparently.Tanakoi said:And CCP China continues to fund these "grassroots" anti-datacenter and anti-AI groups and propaganda ... assisted by low IQ individuals who believe AI is "using all da water" and "stealing our jobs!"
Also is the end goal of AI not automation? That's how I and many others see it being promoted by the wealthy elite. Has there not been a big push to replace everything including artists with AI? Some of the more honest and diehard techbros even talk of a "permanent underclass" because of AI. -
rgd1101 Reply
similar to nuclear power plant. they bring in properties tax. but they shouldn't use farmland or too close to residential areaTanakoi said:"Google Datacenter transforms local schools from worst-funded to best-funded in the state; many other benefits as well"
https://www.newson6.com/tulsa-oklahoma-news/pryor-public-schools-talks-impact-of-googles-data-center-on-the-district-gives-us-an-advantage