Join for quick access. Enter your email below and we'll send confirmation plus sign you up to our newsletter.
By submitting your information, you confirm you are aged 16 or over,
have read our
Privacy Policy
and agree to the
Terms & Conditions. Geographical rules apply.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Join the club
Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.
An account already exists for this email address, please log in.
Michigan township combats nuclear weapons data center by passing ban on new electrical infrastructure — 220,000-square-foot hyperscale project is backed by University of Michigan and the Los Alamos National Laboratory
Many towns, counties, and states have been passing data center moratoriums to delay these projects so that they could study their impact and create mitigations before this infrastructure even before they get off the ground. However, Ypsilanti, Michigan, is taking a different approach to this issue. Instead of putting a moratorium on data centers, the township put a temporary ban on the underlying electrical infrastructure needed to run them. According to 404 Media, the six-month delay is intended for studying the potential effects that the proposed electrical substation needed to power the project will have on noise pollution and existing customers.
“We need to make sure it’s in the right location from a planning standpoint, and we need to make sure that we have ordinances in place that require DTE or any electrical company to go through a process,” Ypsilanti Township Supervisor Brenda Stumbo said in a statement. The township will determine “the nature and scale of electrical infrastructure necessary to serve new high-energy-demand land uses [...] including infrastructure associated, but not limited to hyper-scale data centers, mid-sized data centers, artificial intelligence computing facilities, and high-performance computational centers, industrial facilities, and other intensive electrical users” during the six-month period.
This move is related to the University of Michigan’s announcement that it will build a 220,000 square-foot hyperscale data center on a 144-acre plot of land on Textile Road. The data center, which costs $1.25 billion, is part of the University of Michigan and Los Alamos National Laboratories (LANL) work on nuclear weapons. The University said in its press release that the development “will give scientists the computing power needed to solve the world’s most complex challenges” and that it’s “not a military instillation or weapons production facility.” It also added, “No hazardous nuclear materials will be stored or used on-site, no weapons production will occur at the site, and the facility will not conduct real-time defense operations.” However, that isn’t the primary concern of many of Ypsilanti’s residents. Instead, it’s the fact that many other data center projects have caused grief to the communities that they are in.
The electricity moratorium isn’t the first one that the township took to delay the data center project. In April of this year, Ypsilanti voted yes to another moratorium — a one-year temporary ban on delivering water to hyperscale data centers as it studies the impact of the massive water demands, which was estimated to be at 500,000 gallons per day.
It’s unclear what will happen after the moratoriums that Ypsilanti set expire, but even after the first temporary ban was set, the University of Michigan still went forward with its groundbreaking. The institution also threatened to sue the township, calling its action to delay its data center project “discriminatory.” Aside from that, the federal government has historically supported data center projects that it deems crucial for its projects, like when the Department of Justice asked the court to dismiss the NAACP lawsuit against xAI’s use of unpermitted gas turbines at its Colossus data centers.
Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.
If they can't use water then at some point massive fans circulating air causing noise pollution could be a solution.
Electrical substations can be bypassed with diesel generators.
If they can't use water then at some point massive fans circulating air causing noise pollution could be a solution.
Electrical substations can be bypassed with diesel generators.
Ordinances against noise and noise pollution are not unheard of. One could find them in almost every town these days.
Ordinances against noise and noise pollution are not unheard of. One could find them in almost every town these days.
Generators can be made quiet and the air can be cleaned post burn. The companies can also just do it anyways, and then just go to court with the town, city, county, and drag out the litigation for years all the while doing all of the above baring injunctive relief. Many of these types of ordinances are also unconstitutional and are unenforceable against a resident, let alone an entire company.
Generators can be made quiet and the air can be cleaned post burn. The companies can also just do it anyways, and then just go to court with the town, city, county, and drag out the litigation for years all the while doing all of the above baring injunctive relief. Many of these types of ordinances are also unconstitutional and are unenforceable against a resident, let alone an entire company.
Nice point of view, aligns perfectly with predatory practices of some irresponsible big companies!! I am sure you'd still agree if this was right next to your door.
Do let me know when you find a noise or pollution ordinance that's unconstitutional, by the way!
Nice point of view, aligns perfectly with predatory practices of some irresponsible big companies!! I am sure you'd still agree if this was right next to your door.
Do let me know when you find a noise or pollution ordinance that's unconstitutional, by the way!
The first amendment protects against a lot of those noise ordinances. There are all kinds of city ordinances that are unenforceable. I was not referring to the pollution related stuff, so fair point there.
This is not "some company" . It is the university of Michigan and the US dept of energy which runs the lab. So you have 2 groups who are now both going to spend taxpayer money fighting it out in court. The dept of energy I am sure has far more say on power plants.
The first amendment protects against a lot of those noise ordinances. There are all kinds of city ordinances that are unenforceable. I was not referring to the pollution related stuff, so fair point there.
Nice try. Next time they build a noisy, polluting huge whatever next to your house, print the text below and go to their huge doors to show them and they will pick up and leave in terror!!
On the other hand, it seems you do support that noisy, polluting huge whatever next to your door, so never mind.
First Amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances
Nice try. Next time they build a noisy, polluting huge whatever next to your house, print the text below and go to their huge doors to show them and they will pick up and leave in terror!!
On the other hand, it seems you do support that noisy, polluting huge whatever next to your door, so never mind.
First Amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances
Would you like me to give you a list of several city ordinances being struck down as unconstitutional because of the first amendment stretching back some 80 years?
Would you like me to give you a list of several city ordinances being struck down as unconstitutional because of the first amendment stretching back some 80 years?
No. Please don't go off on this tangent, away from the article itself.
