Startup plans to put nuclear-powered data centers in the sea — modular units could be much faster to deploy, but questions about reliability and longevity remain

a 3D render of an Atomarine ocean-based data center
(Image credit: Atomarine)

Data centers on land are facing increasing opposition and having a hard time getting off the ground — from power connection issues that can take months or years to resolve, to neighborhood concerns about noise and air pollution, as well as their impact on the local water supply. One startup called Atomarine wants to solve this by building nuclear-powered data centers on barges and deploying them at sea.

There have already been various proposals to put data centers out at sea (or even submerged) from established names and startups. We’ve seen conventional examples from companies like Samsung Heavy Industries and Japanese shipping company MOL who to put the servers on dedicated ships and are powered by liquefied natural gas (LNG). There are also more innovative solutions from startups that want to put them in the bases of ocean-based wind turbines or in wave energy converters.

Atomarine differs by building data centers as floating barges, similar to floating oil platforms, which can be deployed anywhere — even in international waters. This should help cut down on the permitting process, and it doesn’t have to worry about disturbing neighbors. The electricity needed to run the infrastructure is then delivered by a power ship moored alongside the barge supplied by LNG ships. Once small modular nuclear reactors (SMRs) become commercially available and certified for shipboard use, operators can then swap out the conventionally powered electricity suppliers with a nuclear one relatively quickly. And because these data center barges are modular in nature, it would be relatively easy to upgrade and scale the floating data center.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware

While this project sounds promising, building a megastructure like this comes with several challenges. The biggest one is that the ocean is massive and unpredictable, so these barges must be engineered to face extreme weather conditions, making them quite expensive to deploy. It must also be connected to high-speed internet (unless the operators plan to ship tons of drives daily), so they’ll have to lay undersea cables, as well. Furthermore, data servers are particularly sensitive equipment, so they must be upgraded to ensure that they can withstand the continuous rolling motion and the salty environment of the sea. There’s also the question of an SMR’s viability in shipborne use, although the U.S. Navy already has a good track record of running nuclear reactors aboard massive vessels.

The mounting opposition against data centers, both by the general public and politicians, is making it harder and more time-consuming to build new projects across the U.S. While an ocean-based data center like this is likely going to be significantly more expensive and technically challenging than land-based developments, this might become the fastest option in the future if the idea proves to be viable.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • Zaranthos
    I haven't looked into the actual logistics of this very closely but it seems like a remarkably stupid idea, and not because of the nuclear reactor part because modern SMR designs are far safer than traditional older designs. The ocean is not good environment for anything like a data center. The salt water is corrosive, even the air would have to be more heavily filtered to prevent internal data center corrosion. It just raises costs and makes long term use a maintenance concern. Storms, or earthquakes could destroy it or seriously damage it, and I'm not sure if ocean based mitigations for those events is cheaper than land based designs.

    Probably has cooling advantages short term, but it seems like a money grab at the AI spending craze that would be highly profitable for rebuilds and maintenance contracts and not a good way to spend that AI money long term. It won't happen anytime soon because I don't think SMR will be ready for a while yet.
    Reply
  • nameless0ne
    It might be competitive if towed to international waters and registered in a country with super-low taxes. SMR aside, if the ship part costs 2x - 3x that of a supertanker, then it might be doable. Musk rented out Colosus for more than 1B a month. It would all depend on how much you can save on taxes vs increased maintenance cost.
    Reply
  • LordVile
    Zaranthos said:
    I haven't looked into the actual logistics of this very closely but it seems like a remarkably stupid idea, and not because of the nuclear reactor part because modern SMR designs are far safer than traditional older designs. The ocean is not good environment for anything like a data center. The salt water is corrosive, even the air would have to be more heavily filtered to prevent internal data center corrosion. It just raises costs and makes long term use a maintenance concern. Storms, or earthquakes could destroy it or seriously damage it, and I'm not sure if ocean based mitigations for those events is cheaper than land based designs.

    Probably has cooling advantages short term, but it seems like a money grab at the AI spending craze that would be highly profitable for rebuilds and maintenance contracts and not a good way to spend that AI money long term. It won't happen anytime soon because I don't think SMR will be ready for a while yet.
    Depends how you’re planning to use it. A sealed unit using refrigerant would bypass most of these issues. You can also moor them in calmer seas less prone to storms
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    Once small modular nuclear reactors (SMRs) become commercially available and certified for shipboard use
    So, decades from now, if ever.
    Reply
  • Scifieart
    Surprised they haven't tried to buy the decommissioned hulks of old USN carriers like Enterprise. They're already built, have massive internal hangar and deck space and have reactors already. Would only be marginally less stupid.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    Scifieart said:
    Surprised they haven't tried to buy the decommissioned hulks of old USN carriers like Enterprise. They're already built, have massive internal hangar and deck space and have reactors already. Would only be marginally less stupid.
    So many reasons no.

    Primarily, once decommissioned, they no longer have the 50 year old reactors.
    Reply
  • Scifieart
    USAFRet said:
    So many reasons no.

    Primarily, once decommissioned, they no longer have the 50 year old reactors.
    Oh I know it's dumb. But these AI bros are that dumb. Microsoft is already trying to reactivate the reactors at 3 Mile Island. They're grasping at straws. Can't the bubble just pop already.
    Reply
  • Zaranthos
    USAFRet said:
    Once small modular nuclear reactors (SMRs) become commercially available and certified for shipboard use
    So, decades from now, if ever.
    Probably a decade, more or less, based on current estimates. Nuclear power of all types has gotten a huge uplift from the AI boom. Commercial land based SMR should happen much sooner.
    Reply