Motorless solid-state cooler uses heat to cool itself; could recycle processor heat into cooling — shape-memory alloy films could turn data center exhaust into refrigeration

elastocaloric cooling
(Image credit: Yi-Ting Hsiau and Jingyuan Xu, KIT)

A team of scientists in Germany and Japan has demonstrated a solid-state cooling system that uses heat to generate the mechanical work required for refrigeration, potentially opening a route to processors and data centers that recycle some of their own waste heat for cooling. Developed by researchers at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) and the University of Tsukuba, the system — detailed in Nature Energy on August 28 — replaces the electrically powered actuator normally required for elastocaloric cooling with a heat-responsive shape-memory alloy, allowing the cooling cycle to run from an external heat source rather than a motor.

The prototype combines two ultra-thin metal films that serve as an actuator and a refrigerant. A 22-micrometer titanium-nickel (TiNi) shape-memory film contracts when heated, converting thermal energy into mechanical motion. This motion stretches and releases a 26.5-micrometer titanium-nickel-iron (TiNiFe) refrigerant film, triggering a reversible phase transition that produces cooling. In laboratory tests, Joule heating the actuator to 86°C produced a 12.9 K temperature span across the refrigerant film — the difference between its hottest and coldest states during the cooling cycle — and a 4.0 K span across the assembled cooling device, measured between its hot and cold sides. When the researchers replaced the resistance heating with an external 130°C heat source, the prototype still maintained a 2.2 K device-level temperature span, demonstrating that an external thermal source could drive the cooling mechanism.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Etiido Uko
News Contributor

Etiido Uko is a news contributor for Tom's Hardware covering the latest updates in big tech and the PC industry. He is a mechanical engineer and senior technical writer with over nine years of experience in documentation and reporting. He is deeply passionate about all things engineering and technology, and is an expert in gadgets, manufacturing, robotics, automotive, and aerospace.

  • S58_is_the_goat
    A team of scientists
    This is where i stop reading.
    Reply
  • RoLleRKoaSTeR
    I thought that in this universe we obey the laws of thermodynamics?
    Reply
  • Tanakoi
    RoLleRKoaSTeR said:
    I thought that in this universe we obey the laws of thermodynamics?
    You're absolutely right that a system can't use its own heat to cool itself. Kudos on picking up on that so quickly. However, the waste heat exhausted from A can indeed be used to cool B.

    S58_is_the_goat said:
    This is where i stop reading.
    Eh? Would a team of typewriter-equipped squirrel monkeys have kept you reading?
    Reply
  • hush now
    S58_is_the_goat said:
    This is where i stop reading.
    yeah cause scientists are not credible sources of information, obviously. we should definitely rely on a snakeoil salesman politician, evangelical pastor turned online health quack, or a nepo baby tech bro on a podcast to tell us what to believe instead.
    Reply
  • S58_is_the_goat
    hush now said:
    yeah cause scientists are not credible sources of information, obviously. we should definitely rely on a snakeoil salesman politician, evangelical pastor turned online health quack, or a nepo baby tech bro on a podcast to tell us what to believe instead.
    You have some issues there... I stop reading cuz that tech is 5-20 years away whenever it starts with "a team of scientists"
    Reply
  • t3t4
    Yessss, finally. Somebody needs to do 'something' useful with all that wasted heat! It's my #1 pet peeve complaint with all these efficiency measurements. Nobody is factoring in all that heat that is literally being thrown away, or the secondary problems that all that heat creates. My workhorse PC is literally a space heater. It's great in the winter but pure hell fire in the summer. That ain't 92% efficient folks! Something useful must be done with all that heat, otherwise it's an added cost!
    Reply
  • Eximo
    t3t4 said:
    Yessss, finally. Somebody needs to do 'something' useful with all that wasted heat! It's my #1 pet peeve complaint with all these efficiency measurements. Nobody is factoring in all that heat that is literally being thrown away, or the secondary problems that all that heat creates. My workhorse PC is literally a space heater. It's great in the winter but pure hell fire in the summer. That ain't 92% efficient folks! Something useful must be done with all that heat, otherwise it's an added cost!
    If you are referring to power supply efficiency, that is only one component, and the waste heat is generated in the conversion from high to low voltages. Total efficiency of the computer would be an entirely different figure and would have to be based on a work output metric like Operations/Sec/W. (Or these days TOPS/W).

    The amount of energy available to capture isn't insignificant, but the mechanisms we have available to use that heat are not efficient themselves. Not typically worth the cost to buy the hardware to do it, and computers don't get hot enough for any practical thermal engines. You could maybe run a small sterling or piezo fan with the heat. But you would be better off just powering a normal fan and building a ducting system to expel that heat to where you aren't.

    On the manufacturing side, it is better to spend effort to improve the efficiency of the electronics themselves. If you look at late model laptop chips, they are amazingly efficient compared to even ten years ago. Or, in your case, choose components with less power output or set power limits. I do that sometimes in the summer.

    I recall when the best power supplies available were more like 70% efficient, and they had to create a certification called 80 Plus...
    Reply
  • t3t4
    Eximo said:
    If you are referring to power supply efficiency, that is only one component, and the waste heat is generated in the conversion from high to low voltages. Total efficiency of the computer would be an entirely different figure and would have to be based on a work output metric like Operations/Sec/W. (Or these days TOPS/W).

    The amount of energy available to capture isn't insignificant, but the mechanisms we have available to use that heat are not efficient themselves. Not typically worth the cost to buy the hardware to do it, and computers don't get hot enough for any practical thermal engines. You could maybe run a small sterling or piezo fan with the heat. But you would be better off just powering a normal fan and building a ducting system to expel that heat to where you aren't.

    On the manufacturing side, it is better to spend effort to improve the efficiency of the electronics themselves. If you look at late model laptop chips, they are amazingly efficient compared to even ten years ago. Or, in your case, choose components with less power output or set power limits. I do that sometimes in the summer.

    I recall when the best power supplies available were more like 70% efficient, and they had to create a certification called 80 Plus...
    I was not just referring to PSU's, although I did use PSU efficiency numbers for example. I'm looking at total input vs total output. 100% of the heat that is thrown away is a 100% loss. It's not just a factor of electrical input consumption, but the total output verses the total input. When I have to spend 4 amps of electrical current to cool a room being heated by a 100% efficient CPU, that ain't efficient at all!

    At the very least, all of these coolers should have TEC's installed on them to recoup at least some of that wasted energy. 10% of something is still better then 100% of nothing.
    Reply
  • Eximo
    t3t4 said:
    I was not just referring to PSU's, although I did use PSU efficiency numbers for example. I'm looking at total input vs total output. 100% of the heat that is thrown away is a 100% loss. It's not just a factor of electrical input consumption, but the total output verses the total input. When I have to spend 4 amps of electrical current to cool a room being heated by a 100% efficient CPU, that ain't efficient at all!

    At the very least, all of these coolers should have TEC's installed on them to recoup at least some of that wasted energy. 10% of something is still better then 100% of nothing.
    10% is optimistic. The better question is what would you do with that energy. You could run another device, with its own losses. Kind of a never ending game of thermodynamics.

    Not sure what you mean by a 100% efficient CPU.
    Reply
  • t3t4
    Eximo said:
    10% is optimistic. The better question is what would you do with that energy. You could run another device, with its own losses. Kind of a never ending game of thermodynamics.

    Not sure what you mean by a 100% efficient CPU.
    If you don't yet fully understand thermal loss is the problem, then I am not capable of explaining it further. Loss is a loss, 'anything' that mitigates that loss is a net win, and therefore, an improvement on total in verses total out.
    Reply