President Trump expands AI data center ‘ratepayer protection pledge’ to include state governors and utility companies — White House claims this will make electricity more affordable

President Donald Trump at the Ratepayer Protection Pledge announcement in July 2026
(Image credit: Getty Images)

23 state governors and 187 utility companies and data center developers have signed President Donald Trump’s “ratepayer protection pledge,” which is Washington’s way of trying to control spiraling electricity costs driven by the massive power demand of AI data centers. According to The Associated Press, some of the signers include utility companies NextEra Energy, Duke Energy, American Electric Power, Southern Co., and Pacific Gas & Electric, and data center developers Equinix, Digital Realty, and Prologis.

Trump expands pledge to shield consumers from high utility bills from AI data centers - YouTube Trump expands pledge to shield consumers from high utility bills from AI data centers - YouTube
Watch On

Trump first revealed this promise in late February during the State of the Union address and then hosted some of the biggest AI hyperscalers — including Meta, Amazon, and OpenAI — in the White House a week later to force them to spend on their own power requirements. This was supposed to help bring electricity costs down, with Energy Secretary Christ Wright saying back in March that it “will deliver more affordable, reliable, and secure energy for the American people.” The president repeated this promise during the event, saying, “Electricity bills for American families will actually come down. They’re going to have a lot of electricity left over, and they’ll put that into the grid.”

Unfortunately, the March promise had little to no effect on electricity rates across the country at the moment. Despite the White House’s promises that the pledge would lower utility bills, PJM Interconnection, the nation’s largest power grid operator, slapped Maryland with a $2-billion bill for upgrading its grid to accommodate out-of-state AI data centers. Monitoring Analytics, an independent watchdog monitoring PJM Interconnection, also said that the 75.5% increase in power costs in the U.S.’s largest power region has been directly caused by data centers.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware

It’s unclear if these cost increases are the long-term effects of the AI build out even before the White House pledge, but it seems the administration is doubling down on it by asking states, utility companies, and data center developers to commit to it, too. Trump has been pushing for the acceleration of the adoption of AI tools and the infrastructure needed to support them, believing that it needs to win in the “AI race” to maintain its global supremacy, especially as China is neck-and-neck with the U.S. when it comes to the technology.

However, the American public is pushing back against these developments, especially as issues impacting electricity costs, water quality, noise pollution, and more that were caused by data centers are widely reported. It has gotten to the point that several jurisdictions have applied temporary bans on data center developments, including Seattle (which plays host to Amazon and Microsoft) and the state of New York. These developments threaten to derail the current administration’s AI policy, which has ordered grid operators to expedite AI data center applications.

The ratepayer protection pledge will supposedly allow the U.S. to have its data centers without punishing the common American with excessive electricity cost increases, but its critics say that it’s just a promise and cannot be legally enforced. The Associated Press says that California is trying to pass legislation that will codify these promises into law.

Oregon is the only state at the moment to have passed a law that forces developments that use more than 20 megawatts of power to pay their fair share. The POWER Act, which was passed in April 2025 — almost a full year before Trump announced the ratepayer protection pledge — forces the power bills of large electricity consumers to “reflect the true costs of their electric service.” Because of this, Portland General Electric (PGE), the state’s largest power supplier, has increased the data center power bills by 30% while also cutting residential costs by 1.3%.

It’s unclear if any of the states that have signed the pledge have similar legislation underway, or what steps the data center developers will take to follow through on their promises. Still, the U.S. president is adamant that states should support data center development within their borders. “You have to convince your community. You can’t fight it. You have to go with it,” Trump said. “If you don’t take all that money, somebody else is going to take it. You might as well do it yourselves.”

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • blppt
    The ratepayer protection pledge will supposedly allow the U.S. to have its data centers without punishing the common American with excessive electricity cost increases, but its critics say that it’s just a promise and cannot be legally enforced.

    I really wish this administration would, just once, do things that aren't just empty headline grabbers. If this had been codified into law, its a great idea. Leaving it up to states or lower authority to get that part down is going to make this almost meaningless except for the few governors who aren't in the pocket of Big Tech from either side of the aisle.

    (or those who actually believe Data Centers/AI aren't a bubble economy and will help their state)
    Reply
  • PEnns
    blppt said:
    I really wish this administration would, just once, do things that aren't just empty headline grabbers. If this had been codified into law, its a great idea. Leaving it up to states or lower authority to get that part down is going to make this almost meaningless except for the few governors who aren't in the pocket of Big Tech from either side of the aisle.

    (or those who actually believe Data Centers/AI aren't a bubble economy and will help their state)

    Things concerning major, big companies are quite often "self regulations" or a "pledge'. For the rest of us peasants, it is always a law.

    Maybe we should "pledge", even a "pinky pledge" to pay those enormous electric bills, but are not really obliged by law....and see how that works out!
    Reply
  • bigdragon
    I'm a ratepayer in PJM's territory, under Constellation and BGE. There's a lot of politicians and agencies taking victory laps over some sort of intervention involving rates in my region, but my bills are the same -- they haven't come down since the giant leap in 2025 and the smaller increase in 2026. AI data centers are still being built with reckless abandon all over northern Virginia nearby. I want to see this pledge replaced by actual laws and ordinances because I don't think the pledge is accomplishing anything concrete beyond the headlines.
    Reply
  • SteJBorchard
    Pop Corn.

    Ill show myself out.
    Reply
  • allc0re
    The only interest this regime has is self-interest. If this helps ratepayers, it will be accidental and/or miniscule compared to the amount it helps corporations and capitalists. This is to appease the masses while padding pockets and delivering cruelty.
    Reply
  • LordVile
    How about the data centres pay their dues rather than socialising the cost?
    Reply
  • SteJBorchard
    LordVile said:
    How about the data centres pay their dues rather than socialising the cost?

    And this is also why now in my life I hate most sports. especially owners that try and get local cities to pay for stadiums and repairs.
    Reply
  • LordVile
    SteJBorchard said:
    And this is also why now in my life I hate most sports. especially owners that try and get local cities to pay for stadiums and repairs.
    It depends becaure at least sports venues can offer something positive for the area for example the etihad campus in Manchester was funded by the club but had additional which were funded by both the club and council.
    Reply
  • Skramblr
    In Oregon, the Oregon Legislature passed a bill for DC to pay their fair share. This resulted in a 29% rate increase for DC and a 1-2% decrease for residential, commercial and Industrial customers for PGE customers. Definitely a step in the right direction.
    Reply
  • SteJBorchard
    LordVile said:
    It depends becaure at least sports venues can offer something positive for the area for example the etihad campus in Manchester was funded by the club but had additional which were funded by both the club and council.

    The whole Chicago bears things is REDIC!!

    I remember going to the Breeders cup ( At arlington race track, arlington hts IL) around 2002 with NJROTC when I was in high school. Then as of like 2-3 years ago watch the race track get torn out for the hope/chance The bears would go there.

    Silly..
    Reply