Samsung Heavy Industries recruits Greek shipowner and Supermicro to bring 50MW floating AI data centers to market — can be powered by solid oxide fuel cells running on liquefied natural gas

A rendering of the floating data center under development by Samsung Heavy Industries.
(Image credit: Samsung Heavy Industries)

Samsung Heavy Industries signed a three-way agreement with Greek shipowner Capital Clean Energy Carriers and classification society Lloyd's Register at the Posidonia shipping exhibition in Athens earlier this month to commercialize a 50MW floating data center, according to Chosun Biz. The deal followed the signing of a joint development agreement between the shipbuilder and Supermicro to verify whether AI servers can run reliably on water, with the design pairing seawater cooling with LNG-fueled fuel cells for onboard power. Under the proposed business model, shipowners will buy the platforms and lease capacity to operators on long-term contracts, much like how they charter tankers.

The memorandum of understanding splits the work three ways: Samsung Heavy handles technology and construction, Capital leads project sourcing and investment, and Lloyd's Register covers regulation and certification. Samsung Heavy signed a second memorandum with consulting arm Lloyd's Register Advisory covering feasibility studies and an assessment of the North American market.

Receiving approval in principle from the American Bureau of Shipping and Lloyd's Register in April, the 50 MW project can draw external power through subsea cables when moored in ports or coastal waters, or generate its own using solid oxide fuel cells running on LNG, sidestepping long grid connection queues that have stalled land-based projects in the U.S. and Europe. Jerry Kalogiratos, CEO of Capital Clean Energy Carriers, said in Lloyd's Register's announcement that floating data centers offer "a scalable and flexible solution, with the unique advantage of mobility."

Latest Videos From

Meanwhile, the agreement with Supermicro is designed to address the question of whether precision AI hardware can tolerate environmental factors like vibration, tilt, salt, and humidity over a multi-year service life. Samsung Heavy will develop offshore positioning control and technologies to seal out salinity and moisture, while Supermicro validates server operating conditions in river and marine environments. The shipbuilder is leaning on its floating LNG production facility experience to integrate power, cooling, networking, and safety systems into a single hull.

Besides Samsung Heavy, Japan’s MOL is also building a 73 MW floating data center with Karpowership for a 2027 deployment, China's 24MW subsea facility off Shanghai entered full operation last month, and Nautilus Data Technologies operates a much smaller 6.5MW barge at the Port of Stockton, California. Samsung Heavy also has a potential anchor tenant, having signed a letter of intent with OpenAI in October alongside Samsung's 900,000-wafer-per-month Stargate memory commitment, covering joint development of floating data centers. To date, however, there’s no signed customer contract for a named deployment.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Luke James
Contributor

Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist.  Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory. 

  • drea.drechsler
    Definitely intriguing. A way to side-step a lot of permits and red-tape to get it into operation depending on location chosen. And it allows just floating the barge to a new one if the locals decide it's too ugly for their horizon and want a couple million a year to put up with it or something. Or just keep it in international waters and ignore all those details.

    But why not re-purpose some of the many decommissioned oil platforms they've not yet scrapped out? Those that can be relocated share a lot of the same benefits.
    Reply
  • Hooda Thunkett
    I'm not convinced this is a good idea overall. In fact, I'm not sure if this is a sign that building AI data centers is going to finally collapse as an industry, or a sign of even weirder things to come. It just seems impractical compared to putting them in on land.
    That, or maybe the cruise lines are going to figure out they can make more money by throwing out the tourists and stocking up on servers...
    It just feels like a major sign that this is a bubble. A massive bubble, and a whole lot of capital is going to vanish overnight when it pops.
    Interesting times indeed.
    Reply
  • drea.drechsler
    Hooda Thunkett said:
    ....
    It just feels like a major sign that this is a bubble. A massive bubble, and a whole lot of capital is going to vanish overnight when it pops.
    ....
    No argument it might be a sign this is a bubble... how long the bubble lasts and what comes after might be in question still.

    But that's also what makes it a good idea and so darned intriguing since it's probably the ideal solution given the concerns about all these huge mega- AI data center projects sprouting up. When the bubble collapses, there's no huge, empty building left to litter the landscape in the desert (or wherever) with massive tons of suddenly worthless e-waste inside to dispose of. All you have to do is drive it into one of the scrap yards in India and let them salvage out the scrap... like they do with cruise ships and super tankers now.

    It can also be a snap to locate wherever you want in international waters. With sufficient satellite bandwidth, so long as you can keep the LNG fuel cells supplied all you have to do is avoid pirates. But no permits to worry about and it's non-polluting clean (except for CO2). Maybe some wacko environmentalists who think it's shadow is killing the whales or something to worry about, but no large nearby populations for them to get riled up against you for it. But if they do annoy too much... just hire a couple tugs and drag it somewhere else.
    Reply
  • Notton
    drea.drechsler said:
    But why not re-purpose some of the many decommissioned oil platforms they've not yet scrapped out? Those that can be relocated share a lot of the same benefits.
    If I had to guess, it's because those oil rigs have outlived their useful life and are rusted out enough that it's cheaper to build new.

    Unlike a ship shaped thing with compartments, oil rigs don't have any buoyancy redundancy when one of the floats fails.
    i.e. Alexander Kielland disaster
    Reply
  • drea.drechsler
    Notton said:
    If I had to guess, it's because those oil rigs have outlived their useful life and are rusted out enough that it's cheaper to build new.

    Unlike a ship shaped thing with compartments, oil rigs don't have any buoyancy redundancy when one of the floats fails.
    i.e. Alexander Kielland disaster
    A ship (or barge as is the case with this thing from the looks of it) is only as safe as the design and manufacture. In particular the Alexander Keilland (not really an oil platform, but a floating hotel for the oil workers) had inadequate welding on a structure that failed and suffered from insufficient redundancy in the design. It's properly a case study in design failure and there's nothing to say this project by Samsung mightn't end up as one too considering its somewhat first-of-kind nature.

    Most off-shore rigs' primary structures are massively over-built, to withstand storms even with the weight and constant pounding of the heavy equipment operating on them. You only need one that's appropriate for purpose but I'm sure they could find several if more are needed.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    drea.drechsler said:
    But why not re-purpose some of the many decommissioned oil platforms they've not yet scrapped out? Those that can be relocated share a lot of the same benefits.
    I had the same question. Good discussion!
    Reply
  • jp7189
    Im kinda surprised they didnt go nuclear with the power source.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    jp7189 said:
    Im kinda surprised they didnt go nuclear with the power source.
    That seems like something that could be added in a later iteration.
    Reply
  • 3ogdy
    Aristotélis Onassis, is that you?
    Reply
  • jp7189
    bit_user said:
    That seems like something that could be added in a later iteration.
    True. Maybe its quicker to push the prototype through if nuclear isnt in the conversation.
    Reply