Samsung chip division's single-year profits beat its past 40 years of profits, combined, due to increased memory and storage prices — Samsung passes Nvidia to become most profitable company in the world, notches 19x quarterly increase in profit

Samsung Logo
(Image credit: Getty / JUNG YEON-JE)

Samsung announced stellar results last night, noting a 19x quarterly increase in operating profit, allowing the firm to pass Nvidia as the most profitable in the world. Kim Yong-Kwan, president and head of corporate management, strategy, and operations for Samsung Electronics' Device Solutions (DS) division, said that the semiconductor unit's 2026 operating profit will exceed everything it has earned across roughly 40 years in the chip business at a company town hall last Friday, according to a report published Monday by Korea JoongAng Daily.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Luke James
Contributor

Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist.  Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory. 

  • Ferlucio
    Seems like the perfect time to lay off 25% of their workforce. Times are tough after all.
    Reply
  • SmokyBarnable
    It’s not a coincidence that these astronomical corporate profits come at a time of intense and probably unprecedented pain for tech consumers. That’s how capitalism works.
    Reply
  • JC5000
    Why would they ever increase productivity if they can make 40 years profits in a single year. These monopolists are doing it on purpose. The government should sieze their company and split their chips division as well as make all their IP public
    Reply
  • logainofhades
    Hopefully the ram makers lose in court, again, over price fixing.
    Reply
  • JC5000
    Government should sell their chips division to a company that's willing to increase production facilities.
    Reply
  • JC5000
    logainofhades said:
    Hopefully the ram makers lose in court, again, over price fixing.
    Definitely in it together
    Reply
  • Thunder64
    JC5000 said:
    Why would they ever increase productivity if they can make 40 years profits in a single year. These monopolists are doing it on purpose. The government should sieze their company and split their chips division as well as make all their IP public

    That's too extreme. And believe me I hate the situation we're in.
    Reply
  • RealRacinGuy
    While I am normally for Capitalism because I believe Honest Capitalism works however this is an Instance where this is Ridiculous. I am a Sim Racer and race Semi Professionally so obviously having an Abundance of Ram is important for me and this right here makes me Sick and Pissed that Us as Consumers are sitting here hurting while they are over here making RECORD BREAKING PROFITS for No other Reason then they Can! It's Sad to take a bad situation and use it for their Gain meanwhile hurting the Very People they have kept them in Business. Samsung was always a company I found interesting to know they started as a wheat and grain business before switching to a sugar business during the beginning of the Korean War and then to making Walkie Talkie and Radios for the War and then Transitioning to an All Around Electronics Company after the war. I guess it's that very Mindset though that made them capitalize off the LLM BS! I refuse to call it AI because it doesn't think for itself so it isnt True AI anyways!
    Reply
  • SomeoneElse23
    SmokyBarnable said:
    It’s not a coincidence that these astronomical corporate profits come at a time of intense and probably unprecedented pain for tech consumers. That’s how capitalism works.
    This is a symptom of "public corporations".

    Investors love it.

    Sucks for the rest of us.
    Reply
  • magbarn
    So when is anyone else going to want a piece of that pie? Just on profit alone they already rank around 44th country of the world based on GDP. Meanwhile Samsung Memory customer service is so cheap that they won't even replace Louis Rossman's burned out SSD and instead want to refund him based on last year's prices.
    Reply