TSMC confirms significant yield and performance improvements in A14 update — strong interest from AI/HPC and smartphone customers

tsmc
(Image credit: tsmc)

TSMC's A14 (1.4nm-class) fabrication process has made rapid progress in the last three months and is well ahead of N2 at the same stage of development, according to the company's update provided at its earnings call this week. The technology also faces strong customer interest and engagement across both smartphone and AI/HPC applications.

"A14 technology development is on track and progressing well. Internal product-like vehicle demonstrated close to 90% device performance and close to 90% 256Mb SRAM yield," said C.C. Wei, chief executive of TSMC, during the earnings call with analysts and investors.

A14 — which is expected to enter mass production in 2H 2028 — is making rapid progress in terms of performance and yield improvements. This April, the company disclosed that the production node achieved >85% target transistor performance and >80% 256Mb SRAM yield. Roughly three months later, both figures are approaching 90%, which suggests a gain of around 5% in device performance and nearly 10% in SRAM yield.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware

For comparison, TSMC's N2 demonstrated more than 80% of its target device performance and over 50% yield on a 256Mb SRAM test chip in April 2023. By April 2024, the process had advanced to more than 90% of its target device performance and over 80% SRAM yield. While development trajectories are not directly comparable, the figures suggest that A14 is maturing considerably faster than N2 did at a similar stage of development.

The very rapid progress of A14 compared to the relatively slow maturation of N2 at similar stages of development can probably be attributed, at least in part, to TSMC's growing experience with gate-all-around (GAA) nanosheet transistors. Back in 2023, the company barely had enough experience with the production of gate-all-around (GAA) nanosheet transistors, as N2 is its first process technology to adopt such a structure. By contrast, A14 relies on TSMC's 2nd Generation of GAA devices, so it can probably benefit from the transistor-design improvements, process refinements, and manufacturing expertise accumulated during the development and ramp of N2.

It appears TSMC has likely eliminated many of the yield limiters with A14 and N2, though keep in mind that a high 256Mb SRAM yield merely indicates low enough defect density and good process uniformity across a highly repetitive test structure, but it is not directly representative of functional or parametric yield of a commercial processor.

Nonetheless, the close to 90% device performance and close to 90% 256Mb SRAM yield about 2.5 years away from expected mass production start put TSMC's A14 progress well ahead of N2. Such progress can potentially enable TSMC to start high-volume manufacturing (HVM) using A14 ahead of schedule, provided that customer designs are ready, or initiate HVM with better-than-usual functional and parametric yields.

Speaking of customer design readiness, Wei indicated that clients strive to tape-out their A14 designs ahead of schedule, which is a good sign. It is also interesting to note that despite the fact that A14 lacks Super Power Rail backside power delivery (A12 will gain SPR in 2H 2019), it is set to be adopted not only by client processors, but also by AI/HPC applications.

"We are observing a strong level of customer interest and engagement on both smartphone and HPC/AI applications, and customer new tap-out activity is ongoing and ahead of schedule," Wei said.

A14 is TSMC's next-generation process technology that combines the company's 2nd Generation GAA nanosheet transistors with a new standard-cell architecture to improve performance, power efficiency, and transistor density. Compared with N2, TSMC expects A14 to deliver a 10% – 15% performance uplift at the same power and transistor count, or reduce power consumption by 25%–30% at the same frequency and complexity. The node is also projected to increase transistor density by around 20% for mixed designs and by 23% for logic.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

TOPICS
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • usertests
    The node is also projected to increase transistor density by around 20% for mixed designs and by 23% for logic.
    I've said it before but it seems like they are getting a decent (>=13%) SRAM density increase at this node, which is always good to see. The death of SRAM scaling was mildly exaggerated.

    It is also interesting to note that despite the fact that A14 lacks Super Power Rail backside power delivery (A12 will gain SPR in 2H 2019), it is set to be adopted not only by client processors, but also by AI/HPC applications.
    I hope backside power delivery becomes a standard feature for most chips eventually. I think it's almost a half-node jump applied to any particular node, so it could be inevitable.
    Reply
  • DS426
    N2, A14, and A12 were talked about in this article but what about A16? I realize TH has a recent article on TSMC saying A16 is slipping back to 2027, but comparisons to A16 could have been made. It's notable because A16 does have backside power delivery, which is a TSMC first and might explain a big reason why A16 is behind schedule and yet A14 is ahead of schedule as it's missing it.
    Reply
  • attimony
    DS426 said:
    N2, A14, and A12 were talked about in this article but what about A16? I realize TH has a recent article on TSMC saying A16 is slipping back to 2027, but comparisons to A16 could have been made. It's notable because A16 does have backside power delivery, which is a TSMC first and might explain a big reason why A16 is behind schedule and yet A14 is ahead of schedule as it's missing it.
    BSPDN is too expensive (because bonded two wafer)so there is few or no customer
    Reply
  • danwat1234
    25 to 30% power reduction at same frequency and complexity versus N2 seems a bit lower than initially marketed. Will make for a lean and mean CPU citizen science BOINC crunching machine!
    Reply
  • thestryker
    DS426 said:
    N2, A14, and A12 were talked about in this article but what about A16?
    VLSI had the most recent information regarding A16:
    Compared with N2P, the VLSI abstract reports 8–10% higher speed at the same power, or 15–20% lower power at the same speed, plus 8–10% chip-density gain, with mass production slated for Q4 2026.
    https://semiwiki.com/semiconductor-manufacturers/tsmc/370949-tsmc-a16-backside-power-at-vlsi-2026/
    I think the reason it's been left out of the conversation is that TSMC has separated out BSPDN nodes and has yet to ship one. It seems likely that it will be closer to A14 in node capability than N2.
    Reply