Zombie fabs plague China's chipmaking ambitions, failures burning tens of billions of dollars

MEMBER EXCLUSIVE
(Image credit: SMIC)

China's aggressive push to develop a domestic semiconductor industry has largely been successful. The country now has fairly advanced fabs that can produce logic chips using 7nm-class process technologies as well as world-class 3D NAND and DRAM memory devices. However, there are numerous high-profile failures due to missed investments, technical shortcomings, and unsustainable business plans. This has resulted in numerous empty fab shells — zombie fabs — around the country, according to DigiTimes.

As of early 2024, China had 44 wafer semiconductor production facilities, including 25 300-mm fabs, five 200-mm wafers, four 150-mm wafers, and seven inactive ones, according to TrendForce. At the time, 32 additional semiconductor fabrication plans were being constructed in the country as part of the Made in China 2025 initiative, including 24 300-mm fabs and nine 200-mm fabs. Companies like SMIC, HuaHong, Nexchip, CXMT, and Silan planned to start production at 10 new fabs, including nine 300-mm fabs and one 200-mm facility by the end of 2024.

Latest Videos From
Swipe to scroll horizontally

Name

Purpose

Investment

Status

Location

Dehuai Semiconductor

Analog and mixed-signal ICs IDM

$3 billion

Bankrupt, assets auctioned off

Guiyang, Guizhou

Fujian Jinhua Integrated Circuit (JHICC)

300-mm DRAM fab with a 60,000 wafer starts per month

$5.6 billion

Blacklisted by U.S. government; stole trade secrets from UMC; failed to develop DRAM process node

Jingiang, Fujian

GlobalFoundries Chengdu Fab

Logic chip foundry

$1 billion - $10 billion

Revived by Shanghai Huali Microelectronics (HLMC)

Chengdu, Sichuan

Jiangsu Advanced Memory Semiconductor (AMS)

Phase-change memory (PCM) fab; 100,000 300-mm wafers/year

$1.8 billion

Bankrupt; restructuring deal failed; searching for new investors

Huaian, Jiangsu

Huaxin Jiechuang Integrated Circuits Manufacturing

Convert AMS into a multi-service foundry

$2.8 billion

Failed to transfer funds; deal terminated

Huaian, Jiangsu

Jiangsu Zhongjing Aerospace

Two 200-mm CMOS Image Sensor (CIS) fabs

?

Failed to launch; no progress has been made beyond PowerPoint presentation

Jiangsu (exact city unspecified)

Hongxin Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (HSMC)

14nm/7nm logic with ASML lithography equipment

$19 billion

Ran out of funds; site abandoned with unfinished buildings

Wuhan, Hubei

Huaian Imaging Device Manufacturer (HiDM)

CMOS Image Sensor (CIS) fab

$6.3 billion

Stalled; fab never completed

Huaian, Jiangsu

Quanxin Integrated Circuit Manufacturing (QXIC)

12nm/14nm logic fab

?

Cancelled in 2021

Wuhan, Hubei

Tacoma Semiconductor

CMOS Image Sensor (CIS) fab

$3 billion

Collapsed in 2020; leadership disappeared

Nanjing, Jiangsu

Tsinghua Unigroup 3D NAND project

3D NAND fab to replicate success of YMTC

$24 billion

Scrapped after Tsinghua Unigroup missed debt payment deadlines

Chengdu, Sichuan

Tsinghua Unigroup DRAM project

DRAM fab

?

Chengdu, Sichuan Province

Chongqing

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • Constellar
    This is how the PRC operates with respect to developing new and competitive industries: the local government throws a lot of money at any business that claims they have a business plan in the relevant sector, the businesses use the money to grow their businesses, then the government steps aside to allow the businesses to compete with each other including engaging in bankruptcy-inducing price wars, then, at the very end of the process, about two or three world-class companies remain--typically out of hundreds of starters.
    In the United States, the process is usually handled by the venture capitalist and financial underwriter.
    The positive with China's system is you really do end up with world-class businesses in the end, but the problem is expense--it costs a fortune to bring those world-class businesses into being...
    Reply
  • coder0xff
    There's also the issue of IP. It takes a lot more than a good fab to make modern AI accelerators.
    Reply
  • tanon
    Constellar said:
    This is how the PRC operates with respect to developing new and competitive industries: the local government throws a lot of money at any business that claims they have a business plan in the relevant sector, the businesses use the money to grow their businesses, then the government steps aside to allow the businesses to compete with each other including engaging in bankruptcy-inducing price wars, then, at the very end of the process, about two or three world-class companies remain--typically out of hundreds of starters.
    In the United States, the process is usually handled by the venture capitalist and financial underwriter.
    The positive with China's system is you really do end up with world-class businesses in the end, but the problem is expense--it costs a fortune to bring those world-class businesses into being...
    You say it costs them a fortune, but what are you comparing that to? And does that take into account the downstream effects of creating world-leading industries in their economy?

    I think the thing they unambiguously get right is competition. You can't achieve achieve world class results, in a short time frame (if at all) without intense, frenetic competition - and that inevitably means some level of waste, duplication of effort, bankruptcies and later consolidation of the market.

    Pretending otherwise is like saying that you can pan a pound of gold from a river in a single sitting, as long as you're efficient and diligent enough about picking the location, the time, the equipment etc.

    Complex problems, like the best way to develop a technologically advanced economy, sometime aren't amenable to careful, targeted investment and the best means to do so ends up being simple free market competition.

    What's ironic, is the fact that the nominally Communist Party of China understands that fact better than most governments in the West.
    Reply