In late 2024, we reviewed ASRock’s X870E Taichi motherboard and loved its feature set, DIY-friendly nature, and loads of USB ports on the rear IO. Fast-forward to today and we’re covering the newly released ASRock X870E Taichi White. In addition to the different colorway and updated aesthetics, it also receives some iterative feature updates. This includes native 9950X3D support, faster Ethernet, and it’s ASRock’s first motherboard to feature all-white components. But the biggest changes with are the board’s improved looks.

Priced at $449.99 (or $438.99 on Newegg), it’s not inexpensive. But ASRock’s Taichi lineup always delivered the goods, offering flagship-class hardware that cost less than the competition. It may not have a fancy LCD screen like others, but it doesn’t have that same flagship price. Still, it does come with high-end features, including overbuilt power delivery (now with active cooling), 10 GbE (up from 5 GbE), a flagship audio solution with an integrated DAC, and even support for multi-GPU (AMD CrossFire). You get the same M.2 count (four), but fewer SATA ports (three, from six), DIY-friendly features, and plenty of USB ports on the rear IO, including two USB4 (40 Gbps) and Lightning Gaming ports. In short, it’s handsomely equipped.

Performance testing proceeded without a hitch, and the results were average overall. The results showed it was not only a solid productivity machine, be it rendering, encoding, or office work, but also showed it’s a competent gamer too. While it didn’t set the world on fire performance-wise, it was relatively consistent across the board.

Below, we’ll examine the Taichi White’s performance and other features, and decide if it has a chance to make our list of the best motherboards. But before we share test results and discuss details, here are the specifications from the ASRock website:

Specifications of the Taichi White

Inside the Box

Inside the box with the motherboard are a few accessories to get you started. You get four SATA cables (for three ports), three thermistor cables, an ARGB splitter cable, and last but not least, the Wi-Fi antenna. It’s not much, but it will at least get you a good wireless internet connection and let you attach SATA-based drives without a trip to the store.

Design and Features of the Taichi White

The Taichi White, like the original, keeps the same general design, with a vertical M.2 socket to the right of the RAM, and it uses a white, 8-layer PCB with beefy heatsinks covering the VRMs and two M.2 sockets, with the rest more of a plate-style cooling. Gone is the polarizing look of the original, with the gold dots and distinct cogs as the main design feature, moving to a more subtle look. We spy the Taichi branding on the left VRM heatsink, and you can see the small VRM fan, which is a unique look.

There are two RGB lighting zones: one hidden below the plate heatsink across the bottom and the other on the left VRM heatsink, which lights up the whole surface by the fan. ASRock’s Polychrome Sync software controls the lighting, with several canned light patterns, and most you can adjust (speed and color). The appearance is improved compared to the first X870E Taichi, but you’ll have to design an all-white build to take advantage of it.

Looking at the top left corner, we see your typical configuration with two 8-pin EPS connectors (one required) and the VRM heatsink. The latter uses a heatpipe to connect the top portion of the VRMs to the main, actively cooled portion of the heatsink. The tiny little fan remains off at idle and ramps up under load. It was quieter than the AIO we use, so there are no worries about noise. You can control the device in the BIOS and through Windows software. However, there’s better control through the latter. Here we see a tamer version of the Taichi theme, with the Taichi branding written vertically in chrome.

To the right of the socket area, we see the four DRAM slots, with locking mechanisms on both sides. ASRock lists support up to DDR5-8200, which is well above AMD’s sweet spot for the platform, but still a bit lower than some other high-end boards. We didn’t have any issues with our kits, including the DDR5-8000 kit with our APU.

Above the DRAM slots are the first three (of eight) 4-pin fan/pump headers. Each header supports PWM and DC-controlled devices through the BIOS. The lion's share of these headers (CPU_FAN2, CHA_FAN1-4, and both AIO_PUMP headers support a whopping 3W/36A each and also auto-detect 3-pin/4-pin, while the CPU_FAN1 supports up to 1A/12W. There’s plenty of output available.

To the right of the DRAM slots is a vertically oriented M.2 socket that uses ASRock’s M.2 Key Latch to hold the device down and the M.2 heatsink quick release to attach and detach quickly—this socket, M.2_2, is a PCIe 4.0 (64 Gbps) M.2 socket. Don’t let the heatsink fool you. It’s labeled as “Blazing” M.2 (typically reserved for PCIe 5.0-capable sockets), but it’s PCIe 4.0 (what ASRock calls “Hyper”).

Along the right edge, starting in the top-right corner, we spy the two-character Dr. Debug diagnostic panel that displays POST codes in bright white, and below that are LED-backlit Power and Reset buttons. Below those are the first two 3-pin ARGB headers, followed by the 24-pin ATX power lead for the board, a 19-pin USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 Gbps), and finally a front panel USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20 Gbps) Type-C connector.

Power delivery on the X870E Taichi White uses the same robust configuration as the original. There are 25 phases total, with an incredible 22 dedicated to Vcore. Power flows from the 8-pin EPS connectors to the Renesas RA229628 controller (there’s a second controller for the SOC, etc.). From there, power goes to the Renesas R2209004 110A SPS MOSFETs. The 2,420A available will handle any processor you throw at it with aplomb. Be it stock, overclocked, or even extreme overclocking, the power bits and active VRM cooler won’t have any issues, even with a Ryzen 9 9950X or the Ryzen 9 9950X3D2.

On the bottom half of the board, starting on the left and hidden under a shroud, is the audio section. ASRock uses the flagship Realtek ALC4082 codec (along with several dedicated audio capacitors) and the ESS SABRE9219 DAC for real panel audio. It also supports direct-drive technology on the front headphone port, supporting up to 600 Ohm headsets. This combination of codec and DAC is one of the best native audio solutions on motherboards.

In the middle of the board are two full-length slots, both of which connect through the CPU and split up x16 PCIe 5.0 lanes. The top slot supports up to x16 while the bottom is up to x8. When both are in use, it’s x8/x8.

Mixed in and around the PCIe slots are three M.2 sockets. Above the PCIe slot is the one and only PCIe 5.0 x4 (128 Gbps)-capable M.2 socket hidden under a significant heatsink. Recently, we tested motherboard heatsink contact on the primary M.2 heatsink (also with a quick release) and found that a majority do NOT make good contact with the devices they’re supposed to cool. The good news is the Taichi White was one (of six) that made adequate contact on both sides. The other two M.2 sockets in this area, both PCIe 4.0 x4 (64 Gbps), reside under the plate heatsink. Note: The Taichi White doesn’t share bandwidth with PCIe slots, USB ports, or anything. So feel free to stuff this board like a Thanksgiving turkey and get everything possible out of your USB, M.2, and PCIe slots.

Moving right, past the chipset to the edge are your three SATA ports. This is one place where ASRock cut back (from six), but these days, most people can get by with three SATA ports and four M.2 sockets. If you’re into RAID configurations, the SATA ports support RAID 0/1 modes while NVMe supports RAID 0/1/10. Finally, we've included a few images of the board's active ICs. ASRock uses a mix of Realtek (PWM controller, audio, MOSFETs) and Marvell ICs.

At the bottom are several headers, including front-panel audio and USB ports. A complete list of connectivity is listed below (from L to R):

• Front panel audio
• 4-pin RGB
• 3-pin ARGB
• (3) 2-pin Thermistor headers
• (2) USB 2.0 headers
• (4) 4-pin fan headers
• 19-pin USB 3.2 Gen 1 header
• 2-pin Clear CMOS jumper
• Speaker
• Front panel

Flipping the board around to the rear IO, you can see it’s chock-full of colorful USB and other ports. On the left are Clear CMOS and BIOS Flashback buttons. Next to those are the Wi-Fi 7 (remember, it’s ‘only’ 160 Hz) antenna connections and the HDMI (v2.1) port. Next to that are stacks of colored USB ports. In total, there are 12: two USB 4 (40 Gbps) Type-C ports that double as video outputs; five USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gbps), two of which are the Lightning USB ports (yellow - designed to reduce latency by using different controllers). Three USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 Gbps) ports (purple) support USB PD 3.0 charging up to 5V@3A (15W). Lastly, there are two USB 2.0 ports in black. Above one of the Type-C ports is the Marvell (Aquantia) 10 GbE, and finally, on the right end, is the audio stack with two 3.5mm and SPDIF outputs.

If you’re an esports gamer where every millisecond counts, the lighting gaming ports could come in handy. Otherwise, it’s not really something that adds value to the average user.

MORE: Best Motherboards

MORE: How To Choose A Motherboard

MORE: Best Motherboard Deals

MORE: Best Motherboard Combo Deals

MORE: All Motherboard Content

Firmware

Like other X870E ASRock boards, the X870E Taichi White starts in the informative Easy Mode, but it also lets you adjust several options (XMP, profiles, boot order, access to Fan-Tastic Tuning, etc.) here. The Taichi White uses a grey background and black characters, more or less matching the new Taichi’s theme. The high contrast also makes it easy to read. The standard BIOS displays headings across the top, with subheadings and details below.

You can tweak everything here, as ASRock includes every option you can think of. Overclocking is straightforward, with most options readily available. The layout is logical, and the mouse movement is smooth. We have no significant complaints about the ASRock firmware, but it could certainly use a facelift if it wants to keep up with recent Gigabyte and MSI offerings.

Software

ASRock offers several different software options. These include the App Shop, which lets users install drivers and software; the Nahimic 3 audio control panel; the A-Tuning application that lets you overclock and control fans; the Polychrome RGB software; and more. There’s also a Blazing OC Tuner and a convenient pop-up to install drivers when the system first boots. ASRock’s software provides everything users need to manage and tweak their systems.

Test System / Comparison Products

We’ve updated our test system to Windows 11 (23H2) 64-bit OS with all updates applied as of late September 2024 (this includes the Branch Prediction Optimizations for AMD). Hardware-wise, we’ve updated the RAM kits (matching our Intel test system), cooling, storage, and video card. Unless otherwise noted, we use the latest publicly available non-beta motherboard BIOS. The hardware we used is as follows:

TEST SYSTEM COMPONENTS:

• CPU - AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
• Cooling - Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420
• Storage - Crucial 2TB T705 M.2 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD
• RAM - Kingston Fury Beast DDR5-6000 CL36 (KF560C36BBEAK2-32)
  Teamgroup T-Force Delta DDR5-7200 CL34 (FF3D518G7200HC34ABK)
  Klevv Cras XR5 RGB DDR5-8000 (KD5AGUA80-80R380S)
• GPU - Asus TUF RTX 4080 16G
• PSU - EVGA Supernova 850W P6
• Windows 11 64-bit (23H2 - 22631.4169)NVIDIA Driver 561.09

Benchmark Settings

MORE: Best Motherboards

MORE: How To Choose A Motherboard

MORE: Best Motherboard Deals

MORE: Best Motherboard Combo Deals

MORE: All Motherboard Content

Our standard benchmarks and power tests are performed using the CPU’s stock frequencies (including any default boost/turbo) with all power-saving features enabled. We set optimized defaults in the BIOS and the memory by enabling the XMP profile. The Windows power scheme is set to Balanced (default) for this baseline testing, so the PC idles appropriately.

Synthetic Benchmarks

Synthetics offer a valuable method for evaluating a board's performance, as identical settings are expected to yield similar results. Turbo boost wattage and advanced memory timings are areas where motherboard manufacturers can still optimize for stability or performance, though, and these settings can impact specific testing scenarios.

Starting with the synthetic benchmarks, the Taichi White performed average to below average. Nothing was inordinately slow (or fast), but some results, like POV-ray and Blender, fell on the slower side of average.

Timed Applications

Results from the timed applications were similar and around the average of our tested boards—nothing anomalous here either.

3D Games and 3DMark

Starting with the launch of Zen 5, we’ve updated our game tests. We’re keeping the F1 racing game but have upgraded to F1 24. We also dropped Far Cry 6 in favor of an even more popular and good-looking game in Cyberpunk 2077. We run both games at 1920x1080 resolution using the Ultra preset (details listed above). Cyberpunk 2077 uses DLSS, while we left F1 24 to native resolution scaling.

The goal with these settings is to determine if there are differences in performance at the most commonly used (and CPU/system-bound) resolution with settings most people use or strive for (Ultra). We expect the difference between boards in these tests to be minor, with most falling within the margin of error. We’ve also added a minimum FPS setting, which can affect your gameplay and immersion.

The Taichi White did well in the 3DMark benchmarks and was towards the top of our results. In the actual games, it was slightly below the average, though you wouldn’t be able to tell without a frame counter staring you in the face.

Overclocking

Over the past few CPU generations, overclocking headroom has been shrinking on both sides of the fence, while the out-of-the-box potential has increased. For overclockers, this means there’s less fun to have. For the average consumer, you’re getting the most out of the processor without manual tweaking. Today’s motherboards are more robust than ever, and they easily support power-hungry flagship-class processors, so we know the hardware can handle them. There are multiple ways to extract even more performance from these processors: enabling a canned PBO setting, manually tweaking the PBO settings, or just going for an all-core overclock. Results will vary and depend on the cooling as well. In other words, your mileage may vary. Considering all the above, we will not be overclocking the CPU. However, we will try out our different memory kits to ensure they meet the specifications.

For memory testing, we start with our fastest non-clock driver kit: Klevv 32GB (2x16) DDR5-8000. Per usual on this platform, it booted to Windows but wouldn’t pass a stress test with our 9900X. It did pass with the 8600G APU as expected.

The Team Group DDR5-7200 kit worked without issue. Those speeds are well past AMD’s ‘sweet spot’ for the platform. And because today’s RAM prices are so out of whack, we doubt many are shooting for these higher speeds anyway.

Power Consumption / VRM Temperatures

We used AIDA64’s System Stability Test with Stress CPU, FPU, cache, and Memory enabled for power testing, using the processor's peak power consumption value. The wattage reading is obtained from the wall using a Kill-A-Watt meter, which captures the entire PC (excluding the monitor). The only variable that changes is the motherboard; all other parts remain the same. Please note that we have moved to using only the stock power-use/VRM temperature charts, as this section aims to ensure that the power delivery can handle flagship-class processors.

Stress testing this board with our DDR5-7200 kit showed it using a little more power than the average of all our X870 and B850 boards. At idle, it sat around 94W, slightly higher than average, and it peaked at 270W, one of the lower results under load. This averages out to 182W and is a bit more power-hungry than the average board.

VRM temperatures were good during our testing, peaking at just over 51 degrees Celsius on our sensor and 53 degrees on the hottest internal sensor. With 110A MOSFETs pushing ~150W loads, it’s a solid result with plenty of headroom left for a more powerful processor and/or overclocking.

Bottom Line

The ASRock X870E Taichi White ($449.99) takes everything we liked about the original Taichi and wraps it in a notably cleaner, all-white aesthetic while adding a few meaningful upgrades. The jump to 10 GbE, overkill power delivery with active VRM cooling, ample USB ports on the rear IO, and useful DIY-friendly features make it a compelling option for enthusiasts building a high-end AM5 rig.

The elephant in the room is that the original X870E Taichi still exists, and does so at a much lower price point of $319.99. In essence, if you don’t want a white build or don’t need 10 GbE, you can save quite a bit of money going with the original. You can also get the Asus ROG Strix X870E-A Gaming WiFi 6 Neo ($469.99), and while it’s missing a 10 GbE port (it has 5 GbE), it includes two PCIe 5.0 M.2 slots (four total). MSI’s popular X870E Carbon Wifi ($379.99 on sale) is a less expensive option without 10 GbE, but it also offers two PCIe 5.0 M.2 slots and 5 GbE. However, it is black. Gigabyte’s X870E Aorus Pro X3D Ice ($339.99 on sale, normally $436.99) is also a viable option in white, but lacks 10 GbE and, like the others, a flagship-class audio codec or integrated DACs.

Overall, we like the new X870E Taichi White, but it doesn’t quite have what it takes to make our best motherboards list. Although there are some iterative updates, the white aesthetic is the real winner. Not many users can use 10 GbE (you can also buy a 10 GbE card for your existing PC for around $72), but if you’re looking for a high-end white board and don’t want to spend $450, other appealing options are available.

MORE: Best Motherboards

MORE: How To Choose A Motherboard

MORE: Best Motherboard Deals

MORE: Best Motherboard Combo Deals

MORE: All Motherboard Content

With prices generally higher than their LCD counterparts, the best OLED gaming monitors remain a premium category. And within that, there are flagships even though you’ll rarely see the words “bad” and “OLED” in the same sentence.

Asus ROG Swift displays represent an entire series of flagships, with every model featuring plenty of bells and whistles along with benchmark performance. I’ve looked at many of these in the past, and here, I have the latest one, the PG32UCWM. It’s a 32-inch Tandem RGB Stripe OLED with 4K resolution at 240 Hz, FHD at 480 Hz, Adaptive-Sync, HDR10, DisplayHDR 400, Dolby Vision, and wide-gamut color. Let’s take a look.

Asus ROG Swift PG32UCWM Specs

First, we’ll tackle the alphabet soup in the room: Tandem RGB Stripe OLED. Let’s call it TRS-OLED, consisting of two light-emitting layers with red, green, and blue diodes. This approach addresses several issues. With two layers comes lower power consumption at a given light level. Tandem white OLEDs do the same thing. RGB Stripe takes care of the fringing issue where white diodes behind color filters can spread their light and cause a loss of sharpness. In practice, you will be hard-pressed to see any softness from any OLED, but an RGB Stripe panel like the PG32UCWM is a tad sharper, and you’ll see it in a side-by-side comparison. To this, Asus adds its True Black Glossy screen coating, which earns its name by reducing the effect of ambient light on the screen. Visually, it deepens black areas and improves perceived contrast.

Another advantage of RGB Stripe is increased color volume. Most wide gamut screens employ Quantum Dots to increase volume up to 110% of DCI-P3 or more. RGB Stripe achieves most of that without the light-reducing effect of a QD layer. The PG32UCWM delivers an honest 100% of P3, which is a little less than the competition, but it’s more than the 93-95% coverage of non-QD monitors. Asus promises and delivers accuracy out of the box as well with a calibration report stored in the panel’s firmware.

It wouldn’t be ROG without serious gaming performance, and on that, the PG32UCWM delivers in spades. 240 Hz at 4K is available for those with enough video card power to achieve it. If you want maximum fps, there’s a 480 Hz mode with FHD 1920x1080 resolution. You can also employ ELMB at lower frame rates to reduce motion blur. Asus includes its exclusive OLED Anti-Flicker feature, which mitigates stutter during rapid frame rate transitions. Does this translate into a fast and smooth experience? Check out my test results on page two to find out.

The PG32UCWM supports HDR10 with multiple picture modes and an adjustable option. And it accepts Dolby Vision content, which is still a rarity among computer monitors. Its dynamic tone mapping creates a major improvement in picture depth, regardless of the level to which content is mastered. It will show you every nuance and render every detail present in the original material.

Like all ROG Swift screens, the PG32UCWM includes multiple LED arrays on the back and in the stand where a logo can be projected onto the desktop. There is a full list of GamePlus enhancements like aim points and sniper modes. And some of these can be automated with AI to better adapt to the gaming environment. You also get USBs and a full set of the latest video I/O ports: HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1 and USB-C.

Swift displays usually come with a price premium over their competition, but the PG32UCWM comes out of the gate at $1,299, which isn’t a huge number when you consider its build quality and performance. It is a true flagship.

Assembly and Accessories

A colorfully adorned box houses the PG32UCWM in molded pulp, which is completely recyclable. The stand, base, and panel assemble without tools. The ROG logo projector lens fits under the base with magnets and includes extra lenses. A zippered pouch disgorges a cable bundle consisting of IEC cords, two USBs, HDMI, and DisplayPort. You also get sheets of ROG decals and a microfiber cleaning cloth for that beautiful shiny screen. Speaking of shiny, there is a lot of bling on this monitor, all protected by bits of clear film. It almost becomes a game to find it all, but at least you can be sure your PG32UCWM won’t arrive with scratches.

Product 360

The latest crop of Swift displays, like the PG32UCWM, set themselves apart with LEDs in the stand, a logo projector and clear plastic on the back that reveals the internal componentry. It’s a great complement to a transparent PC case, which Asus can also sell you. The right half includes the Lite-Brite LED feature, which can play a vast array of colors and effects. You also get lighting in the stand where it says “Swift”, in the base, in the ROG logo up front, and in the projector under the stand.

The stand is super solid and includes a 3.1-inch height adjustment plus 5/20 degrees tilt and 15 degrees swivel. There is no portrait mode. If you want one, you’ll need an aftermarket arm that interfaces with the included adapter bracket, which provides a 100mm VESA mount. It comes with beefy fasteners.

The styling is a two-piece configuration with the screen and its metal backing attached to a component bulge. This improves cooling along with a graphene layer and internal heat sinks. Several OLED care features enhance panel life, and Asus backs the PG32UCWM with a three-year warranty that includes burn-in. No internal fans are needed to keep running temps low.

The I/O panel includes one DisplayPort 2.1 (configurable to 1.4), two HDMI 2.1, and a USB-C (DP Alt). USB 3.2 is supported by one upstream and three downstream ports. Audio comes only through a 3.5mm headphone jack; there are no internal speakers.

OSD Features

The PG32UCWM’s OSD has every feature one could want in a flagship gaming monitor, including video processing and extensive image controls. It’s operated by a joystick behind the small protrusion in the front center. Two buttons flank it; one toggles power, and the user can program the other.

At the top of the Gaming menu is the Frame Rate Boost toggle. You can also switch modes with the left control button. Either way, it takes a few seconds for the picture to return. In GamePlus, you get frame counters, aiming points, sniper modes, timers, a stopwatch, and display alignment marks. Some of these have AI-controlled settings which change things like the reticle color or the gamma of the image’s dark areas to increase visibility.

GameVisual has nine picture modes, of which Racing is the default and best choice. Like all Asus ROG monitors, there’s an sRGB Cal mode which is accurate but also grays out the calibration controls. If you want sRGB, it’s better to pick that option from Color Space in the Color menu. Then you can adjust grayscale and gamma if you wish.

HDR is available in HDR10 and Dolby Vision formats. When the appropriate signal is present, you can pick between four different picture modes and turn on an adjustment toggle that enables the brightness and contrast sliders. Also included is Uniform Brightness for both SDR and HDR. If you turn this off, the peak output of small highlights can top 1,000 nits. I measured 532 nits from a 25% window pattern. This feature improves HDR impact and is handy for SDR gaming and video. Turn it on for productivity and static graphics where it will reduce eye fatigue during long work sessions.

The Color menu includes the aforementioned gamut options plus color temp and gamma presets. A set of RGB sliders can dial in grayscale to a very precise level. If you want to tweak color further, there are global and individual saturation controls.

Asus takes OLED care very seriously with a host of options like pixel cleaning, screen saver, orbiter, and logo brightness. All of these can be toggled individually. When I first powered up my PG32UCWM sample, it recommended running the pixel clean straight away, so I did. This often improves screen uniformity for brand-new monitors, though I didn’t see a difference in this case. You also get a proximity sensor that turns off the screen when you leave your desk.

The PG32UCWM includes PIP and PBP options for viewing two video sources at once. You can have individual color settings for the two windows and position and size them how you like. The Lighting Effect menu controls the many effects possible with LEDs in the base and back of the monitor. With Aura Sync enabled through Asus’ Display Widget Center app, you can coordinate the show with what’s happening on screen.

The quick menu has four user-programmable slots for one-click access to different functions. You can also program the four joystick directions and the left control button. There are two settings memories as well.

Asus ROG Swift PG32UCWM Calibration Settings

The PG32UCWM doesn’t need calibration in the Racing mode but I tweaked the RGB sliders for a nice gain, which took it into pro-monitor territory. Color is spot-on whether you choose wide gamut or sRGB. I found similar results in HDR mode when using either Gaming HDR or True Black modes, more about that on page five. Below are my suggested SDR settings including brightness values for Uniform Brightness on or off. You only need to set this value once for each mode, which is nice when switching back and forth.

Gaming and Hands-on

I’ve often said that it’s nearly impossible to buy a bad OLED. All the displays I’ve reviewed over the past few years are super close in performance and image quality. That said, there have been several variations in technology that have subtle effects on the picture. Asus currently has the largest selection of different panel types covering Quantum Dot, Tandem, and RGB Stripe as the major categories. The PG32UCWM combines the latter two into a fourth variant, Tandem RGB Stripe. Looking at my sample, I could immediately see its sharper image. OLEDs are always razor-sharp, but this one is sharper, and I could see that in a side-by-side comparison with a typical Quantum Dot panel.

I could see it while gaming too. The detailed environments of Doom Eternal were even more textural and sharply resolved than usual. Little things like the reflections of light on a gun barrel, or the changing hues of the player’s hand as I moved around had me almost entranced. I’ll warn you now, if you audition a PG32UCWM, you will want to buy it. The sharpness and clarity of this monitor is addictive.

Video processing was exemplary, as it is with any Asus ROG Swift display. Movements and transitions happened with surgical precision as I ran through my usual sequence of run-and-gun maneuvers. Turn and shoot became second nature as I was able to stay apart from enemies and still put most of my ammo on target. Lobbing grenades became easier too. I love the sticky ones!

I always check out the HDR calibration screen in Doom’s menu to look for the correct rendering of both highlight and shadow detail. Game HDR showed a little clipping of highlights, but shadow areas were perfect. True Black was the better mode, which showed everything clearly.

I also tried the dual mode switch. You don’t want to do this in a game because it scrambles the image to where you can’t see the menu. Always make the switch on the Windows desktop. The PG32UCWM lets you do this with a single button press. My GeForce RTX 4090 maintained 220-230fps at 4K and around 430fps in FHD. Though the image was softer, this monitor has smoother scaling than other dual-refresh screens I’ve reviewed. It is a good solution for those who can’t run more than 200fps in 4K.

When the games were put away in favor of getting work done, the PG32UCWM continued to provide a picture that was hard to look away from. It is very colorful, though a few Quantum Dot displays will show you a tad more red and green. But the PG32UCWM covers 100% of DCI-P3 so it still overachieves for SDR in a good way. When editing graphics, I switched the Color Space option to sRGB and enjoyed similarly high accuracy.

The effect of Asus’ True Black Glossy coating was also evident. Blacks seemed deeper because there was no reflected ambient light. The screen is shiny, but it rejects room light as if it were matte. This also makes color more vibrant. It was like having a light-blocking hood in place.

My user experience was completely positive. The PG32UCWM has a familiar and intuitive control and menu system. It’s easy to create different settings memories and to set up the quick menus for easy access to things like picture modes and GamePlus options. I could plug input devices into the USB ports, which was handy. My only minor complaint was the lack of internal speakers. But playing with the extensive LED lighting was fun.

Takeaway: The PG32UCWM is a benchmark gaming display with a reference-quality image. It’s incredibly sharp, and it looks great in brightly lit rooms thanks to its advanced screen coating and Tandem RGB Stripe technology. The refresh rate boost will be useful for those with less stout video cards, and its scaling down to FHD resolution is excellent. Paired with a well-endowed gaming PC, the PG32UCWM is about as good as it gets.

MORE: Best Gaming Monitors

MORE: How We Test PC Monitors

MORE: How to Buy a PC Monitor

To compare the PG32UCWM’s performance, I’ve mined only 32-inch 240 Hz OLEDs from my test database. The more recent models are MSI’s MPG 322UR X24 along with Asus’ PG32UCDM3 and XG32UQWMS. Older screens include Dough’s Spectrum Black 32 and HP’s Omen 32 OLED.

Pixel Response and Input Lag

Click here to read up on our pixel response and input lag testing procedures.

Since acquiring the Nvidia LDAT sensor, I’ve noted that OLED panel response times, black-to-white transition run in a super tight range from 0.12 to 0.24. The PG32UCWM manages this feat in 0.16 in both 240 and 480 Hz modes. Motion blur is non-existent when any of these screens run past 200fps.

In the lag test, the PG32UCWM is the quickest of the 240 Hz screens at 11.2ms average lag over 25 mouse clicks. Only a couple of the 360 Hz panels I’ve tested are quicker, and only by 1.2ms, a microscopic amount. What’s interesting is that 480 Hz is a tick slower at 12.9ms. This is still much lower than any human reaction time, so the difference is imperceptible. I’m confident that this is due to the processing lag involved in scaling the image down to Full HD from 4K.

Test Takeaway: The PG32UCWM is the quickest 32-inch 4K OLED you can buy at this time. Only a couple of 360 Hz QHD screens are a tad quicker, so if you have the video card necessary to run 4K over 200fps, this Asus is your best choice. There’s no motion blur at that speed either. I noted that 480 Hz brought an increase in frame rate but not in motion resolution. And it did not reduce input lag.

Viewing Angles

I’ve noticed slight differences in off-axis images from the different OLED variants I’ve reviewed. The PG32UCWM has two emissive layers, meaning that at any angle other than head-on, they are slightly out of phase with each other. This is the reason for the slight tints seen in a grayscale step pattern. In color patterns, or in actual content, you can’t see this issue. In the side photo, there is no change to brightness or gamma, which is typical of OLED displays. The top view washes out a bit with reduced gamma.

Screen Uniformity

To learn how we measure screen uniformity, click here.

The PG32UCWM is the recipient of serious quality control as its low 2.69% uniformity score indicates. There is no hint of bleed or glow in any part of the image. It doesn’t get much better than this.

MORE: Best Gaming Monitors

MORE: How We Test PC Monitors

MORE: How to Buy a PC Monitor

To read about our monitor tests in-depth, please check out Display Testing Explained: How We Test PC Monitors. We cover brightness and contrast testing on page two.

Uncalibrated – Maximum Backlight Level

To find the PG32UCWM’s maximum brightness value, I turned Uniform Brightness off and measured a 25% window pattern. It peaked just below 500 nits, which is typical for the category. The Dough and HP screens have only fixed brightness for SDR, so they measure the same for window or full white field patterns. The PG32UCWM’s full-field value with Uniform Brightness on was 269 nits. Black levels and contrast could not be measured.

After Calibration to 200 nits

Calibration doesn’t change anything but the peak white value. I recommend setting uniform brightness to 200 nits using a full field pattern and variable brightness to 200 nits using a 25% window pattern. This creates a visual balance between the two modes. Black levels, static contrast and ANSI intra-image contrast could not be measured.

Test Takeaway: The PG32UCWM offers the option of fixed or variable brightness which is something not all OLEDs offer. It’s nice that the user can set individual brightness values for each mode just once. They are saved when switching back and forth which is another standout feature. The PG32UCWM can hit nearly 500 nits showing SDR content which makes it impactful for gaming and video content. Though contrast is theoretically infinite, the True Black Glossy screen coating makes this monitor’s blacks perceptually deeper.

MORE: Best Gaming Monitors

MORE: How We Test PC Monitors

MORE: How to Buy a PC Monitor

The PG32UCWM offers accurate color out of the box and does not need to be calibrated. You can choose between DCI-P3 and sRGB gamuts and adjust grayscale tracking to a high standard.

Grayscale and Gamma Tracking

Our grayscale and gamma tests use Calman calibration software from Portrait Displays. We describe our grayscale and gamma tests in detail here.

In the initial grayscale run, the PG32UCWM shows slight red errors in steps from 60 to 90% brightness. This error is barely visible, even in a test pattern. Gamma tracks very close to the 2.2 reference line. With calibration of the RGB sliders, all but one brightness step drops below 1dE. Gamma becomes a little tighter thanks to a change in the contrast slider.

For sRGB applications, I recommend using the sRGB gamut option rather than the sRGB Cal picture mode. Then, you can calibrate the grayscale if you wish. By default, it’s a little warm in tone. Gamma is excellent with no visible errors.

Comparisons

With a 2.27dE average value, the PG32UCWM has no visible grayscale issues. It can be used without calibration like all the screens here. One should expect this from a premium display. After changes to the RGB values (just blue actually), the error drops to 0.72dE, which is better than all but the MSI. Visually, there is no difference between any of the monitors.

The PG32UCWM’s gamma is very tight with a tiny 0.08 range of values and a 0.45% deviation from the 2.2. reference. The actual value is 2.19, which is nearly perfect and visually flawless.

Color Gamut Accuracy

Our color gamut and volume testing use Portrait Displays’ Calman software. For details on our color gamut testing and volume calculations, click here.

The PG32UCWM aces the default gamut test with a low value of 1.53dE, well below the visible threshold of 3dE. This is the average of 32 measurements. Though it covers right at 100% of DCI-P3, it is slightly oversaturated in the red, magenta, and blue areas of the triangle. Green is perfectly and fully rendered, putting the PG32UCWM ahead of any non-Quantum Dot screen. This is what Tandem OLED tech is supposed to do, and it is successful here. Calibration, shown in the second chart, tightens everything up even further, putting the monitor firmly in reference territory. This is excellent performance.

In the sRGB test, I’m showing a pre-calibration result so magenta is a tad off hue. The score is still quite low at 1.76dE so there’s no cause for complaint. The PG32UCWM is fully qualified for color-critical applications.

Comparisons

As impressive as the PG32UCWM’s color is, it isn’t any better than the others save the XG32UQWMS. I am picking nits here since the naked eye cannot see these differences. But every hundredth of a point counts, and the PG32UCWM has fewer than most with a 1.06dE score. That’s better than many pro monitors can boast, and it’s only a tick behind the Dough and MSI displays. It doesn’t really get better than this.

In the gamut volume test, the PG32UCWM is slightly behind the top four screens. But with almost exactly 100% coverage of DCI-P3, you’ll see every shade and hue from the original content, and more if you run wide gamut mode for SDR. sRGB coverage is also nearly ideal at 96.66%. There is no cause for complaint here.

Test Takeaway: The PG32UCWM is very colorful and accurate with visual perfection out of the box and calibration to a high standard. It is fully qualified for critical applications in either DCI-P3 or sRGB modes. It has a little less color volume than some of the competition but more than the average non-Quantum Dot display. Gamma is tight and ruler straight in every case, which makes fine detail and texture more visible and impactful.

MORE: Best Gaming Monitors

MORE: How We Test PC Monitors

MORE: How to Buy a PC Monitor

Our HDR benchmarking uses Portrait Displays’ Calman software. To learn about our HDR testing, see our breakdown of how we test PC monitors.

HDR is the PG32UCWM’s forte with its bright highlights, deep blacks and vivid color. It supports HDR10 with four specific modes and offers adjustable brightness and contrast. It also plays Dolby Vision content which is a rarity in the computer monitor genre.

HDR Brightness and Contrast

All the screens offer variable brightness for HDR content, so their peak levels vary somewhat. The PG32UCWM is in the middle at a healthy 532 nits which is plenty of light from the 25% window pattern I measured. Asus’ claim of 1,000 nits for a 3% window is completely valid. I measured this by engaging the Gaming HDR mode and turning on Adjustable HDR which upped the peak output a little. That changed the EOTF a little and I’ll show you how below.

Grayscale, EOTF and Color

In the first two charts, you can see the difference between the Gaming and True Black HDR modes. They offer the same accurate grayscale tracking but vary in the EOTF luminance curve. True Black is closer to the reference with only tiny variations from black to white. Gaming offers a little more peak output, but it rises from black too quickly. This will make mid-tone regions a little less textural. These are subtle differences that will be perceived differently by different viewers. I would go for the True Black version, but the Gaming HDR picture will be a little blingier. It’s like the “brighter TV sells better” principle seen at big-box electronics stores. At least the PG32UCWM gives you a choice.

I measured color in both modes and got similar results. There is a slight and general oversaturation in the manner of nearly all the HDR OLEDs I’ve tested. This is typical performance. The picture is very impactful and colorful. In the BT.2020 test, the PG32UCWM runs out of color at 90% red, 75% green, and 95% blue. This is also typical of wide gamut screens with either Tandem or Quantum Dot enhancement.

Test Takeaway: The PG32UCWM delivers a superb HDR image with options to dial it into the user’s liking. I recommend the True Black mode for its luminance accuracy, but some users may prefer the Gaming mode for its higher brightness. Either way, it’s gorgeous to look at. Also of note is that the PG32UCWM is one of the rare computer monitors that supports Dolby Vision.

MORE: Best Gaming Monitors

MORE: How We Test PC Monitors

MORE: How to Buy a PC Monitor

There’s always something special about flagship products. So, if a company makes a line of displays that are all flagship, are any of them special? In the case of Asus’ ROG Swift PG32UCWM, I’m going to say yes. Thanks to Asus’ willingness to seed its stable with multiple OLED panel technologies, we have a large array of choices, all of them good.

The PG32UCWM and its Tandem RGB Stripe panel stand out for being incredibly sharp. In other areas like color, video processing and build quality, it is the same as other Swift displays, but image clarity raises the bar. You can expect accurate color out of the box with reference-level performance after a few adjustments. Video processing is super smooth with perfect motion resolution and the lowest input lag in the category. There’s flexibility in the frame rate boost feature that lets the PG32UCWM work with less powerful video cards. And its extra features like GamePlus and Aura RGB elevate it beyond most premium monitors.

At $1,299, it is an investment, but consider that its performance and build quality mean you’ll be using it for many years through multiple system upgrades. If you desire a flagship monitor and have the budget, the Asus ROG Swift PG32UCWM is well worth checking out.

MORE: Best Gaming Monitors

MORE: How We Test PC Monitors

MORE: How to Buy a PC Monitor

The XPG Novakey RGB DDR5-6000 C30 is Adata's latest memory kit to hit the market, going toe-to-toe with the best RAM. Although we are still living in a memory shortage, memory brands will continue to release new memory products. The releases are not as frequent as before, but we are glad that companies still support consumers. As always, more competition helps improve prices and offers more options for consumers to choose from. Adata recently brought a new Novakey series to the market. It is a product from the brand's XPG division, with a strong emphasis on gaming culture. However, unlike some of Adata's other series that are available with and without RGB lighting, the Novakey lineup is only available with the former.

Adata’s Novakey memory modules stand out for the company's commitment to sustainability. It produces the memory modules with recycled materials, specifically 50% aluminum and 85% post-consumer recycled (PCR) plastic. The heat spreader, which features a brushed matte black aluminum construction, looks nice. The memory modules measure 1.79 inches (45.5 mm) in height, which we do not expect to pose a problem for big air CPU coolers, but it never hurts to double-check.

A defining feature of the Novakey memory modules is the debut of Adata’s patented “Infinity Mirror” design. When not powered on, the surface is synonymous with a reflective mirror. Once illuminated, though, it transforms into a dazzling visual effect. With the help of the lighting, the futuristic geometric silhouette gives the impression that the image looks 3D-ish and pops out.

The Infinity Mirror effect is present on only one side of the memory module, though. The opposite side features a standard black decorative strip. For customization, Adata offers its XPG Prime software, or you can use your motherboard's software, whether it be Asus Aura Sync, Gigabyte RGB Fusion 2.0, MSI Mystic Light Sync, or ASRock Polychrome Sync.

Under the sleek heat spreader, you will find a black 10-layer PCB with eight integrated circuits (ICs) on one side. It uses 2GB SK hynix H5CG48MEBDX014 (M-die) ICs to reach 16GB on each memory module. Meanwhile, Adata sources the power management integrated circuit (PMIC) from Richtek, labeled 0P=CH QYK.

For maximum compatibility, the Novakey memory modules run at DDR5-4800 with memory timings at 40-39-39-77. It supports both Intel XMP 3.0 and AMD EXPO technologies. Regardless of the standard, the only profile onboard the memory modules will get them up to DDR5-6000 and configure the memory timings and DRAM voltage to 30-40-40-77 and 1.4V, respectively. See our PC Memory 101 feature and How to Shop for RAM story for more timings and frequency considerations.

Comparison Hardware

The Intel system features the Core Ultra 9 285K processor and the MSI MEG Z890 Unify-X motherboard with firmware version 7E20v1AA0. Conversely, the AMD system utilizes the Ryzen 9 9900X processor and the MSI MPG X870E Carbon WiFi motherboard with firmware version 7E49v1AA3. The Corsair iCUE Link Titan 360 RX LCD CPU liquid-cooling solution efficiently maintains optimal temperatures for both the Arrow Lake and Zen 5 processors, ensuring efficient thermal management across platforms.

The MSI GeForce RTX 4080 16GB Gaming X Trio efficiently handles demanding graphics workloads, preventing any bottlenecks during our gaming RAM benchmarks. The TeamGroup A440 Lite PCIe 4.0 SSD balances performance and capacity, delivering 2TB of ultra-fast storage with speeds up to 7,400 MB/s—perfect for Windows 11 24H2 installations, benchmarking software, and gaming applications.

The Corsair RM1000x Shift ATX 3.0 power supply delivers reliable and ample power to our test systems, directly supporting the GeForce RTX 4080 via its native 16-pin (12VHPWR) cable. The Streacom BC1 open-air test bench offers flexible, tool-free accommodation for all hardware components, streamlining assembly and component swaps.

Intel Performance

On average, the Novakey memory kit performed a bit slower than competing options like the Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 C36 and the Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6000 C32. The performance gap is not massive, though. Although the Novakey boasts an impressive CAS Latency (CL) of 30 clock cycles, its other memory timings are comparatively loose, which affects bandwidth and latency, leading to lower real-world performance.-world performance.

AMD Performance

Adata’s memory kit delivered similar performance on the AMD system. It neither stood out as the fastest nor lagged behind the slower memory kit among the tested options. The performance was consistent across the range of different benchmarks.

Overclocking and Latency Tuning

Overclocking on the Novakey was a breeze. The only downside is that the kit already operates at a relatively high 1.4V for DDR5-6000, so we needed to increase the voltage further to 1.45V to gain any headroom for overclocking. The memory kit proved to be quite capable and handled DDR5-6400 speeds with the same timings.

The memory kit was unforgiving when attempting to tighten the CL timing, even with additional voltage applied. On the contrary, both the tRCD and tRP timings showed a bit more flexibility under 1.45V and allowed us to decrease them to 36 cycles, four cycles lower than the default values.

Bottom Line

The XPG Novakey RGB DDR5-6000 C30 is not just about looking good inside your system, thanks to the vibrant and customizable Infinity Mirror design. The memory kit's performance will not let you down, even if it's not the fastest contender on the market. At DDR5-6000, Adata is intentionally targeting the sweet spot for both Intel and AMD platforms. The fact that the XPG Novakey RGB DDR5-6000 C30 arrives with both Intel XMP 3.0 and AMD EXPO overclocking profile support ensures seamless integration regardless of the platform of choice.

The XPG Novakey RGB DDR5-6000 C30 has yet to make its debut on the hardware shelves at U.S. retailers. However, Adata has put the memory kit up for pre-order through Adata’s official online store for $589.99. While the price is certainly steep, it falls within expectations of a premium memory kit that is coming out during the memory shortage. Once things get back to normal, we should see Adata's memory kit at a more reasonable price. But for the meantime, the XPG Novakey RGB DDR5-6000 C30 represents a luxury that not many consumers can buy.

Five years ago, there was very little variety in the types of portable monitors available for consumers. You had a few options from well-known desktop monitor brands, and that was about it. However, in the past few years, we’ve seen a large uptick not only in form factors for portable monitors, but also in the adoption of leading panel technologies like OLED.

ViewSonic is a well-known player among the best portable monitors, and we’ve reviewed several of its entries. The latest to grace our lab is the VG1457. This is a dual-display monitor that is quite different from the typical competitors in this space. Rather than having the two displays flank a laptop’s built-in screen with a “spine” connecting them, the VG1457 features two panels stacked on top of each other, joined by a 360-degree hinge.

Due to this design, the VG1457 can be used in several types of orientations across multiple screen modes. And with a sub-$350 price tag, it represents a relative bargain for mobile warriors.

Design of the ViewSonic VG1457

The VG1457 features a remarkable design, incorporating two display panels in a relatively light and compact form factor. Since ViewSonic doesn’t have a thick and heavy frame that needs to support two outstretched panels, the VG1457 only weighs 2.6 pounds (about double that of a portable monitor with a single display). And when folded, it has roughly the same footprint as a single-panel portable monitor (albeit thicker).

Each panel measures 14 inches across and features 1200p resolution. In its default landscape orientation, the VG1457’s panels are stacked on top of each other, with two 360-degree hinges connecting them. However, if you prefer, you can stand the panels up so that they are in portrait mode, with the two panels sitting next to each other, book-style.

In either viewing mode, the twin panels are supported by an adjustable kickstand. The kickstand incorporates dual 2-watt speakers and three USB-C ports. The bottom USB-C port is used exclusively to power the monitor, while the other three USB-C ports can handle power and video, including two-way power delivery up to 65 watts. I was able to power the VG1457 using a single USB-C cable connection to an HP OmniBook X laptop.

ViewSonic includes two USB-C cables and a 65-watt USB-C wall adapter in the box. A felt carrying case is also included, which is sufficient for protecting the VG1457 while traveling. It’s not substantial enough to protect the displays from damage if you drop it, but it should prevent more superficial damage to the displays.

ViewSonic VG1457 Specifications

ViewSonic VG1457 Operating Modes and OSD

The 360-degree hinge design allows the VG1457 to be used in various orientations. The most popular will likely be landscape mode, with the panels stacked. Portrait mode has the two panels side by side, which would be beneficial for editing two Word documents simultaneously, for example.

There’s also a “tent” mode, which would allow you to have one display facing you, and the second facing away from you (i.e., for someone sitting on the opposite side of the table from you). The VG1457 can automatically rotate the screens to the correct visual orientation using the Auto Pivot feature.

In addition to these orientations, there are also several operating modes. Mirror Mode will simply duplicate what’s on your laptop’s screen to both of the VG1457’s displays. Extend will allow you to have a separate image across each display (laptop and both VG1457 displays). Full Screen mode will display one source/image across both of the VG1457’s displays. Finally, dual source mode allows each of the VG1457’s panels to take input from a separate source. For example, one panel could use a laptop as a source, while the second panel could use a tablet as a source.

As for the OSD, it’s controlled by four circular buttons on the right side of the kickstand. It took a little while to get used to, as once a button is pressed, you have to pay attention to the position of the on-screen menus and what button they correspond to. I had to do some mental gymnastics to navigate the interface somewhat smoothly.

The Display Settings menu allows you to choose between Mirror, Extend, Full Screen, and Dual Source modes. The only other configurable options are under the Color Adjust Menu, where you can only adjust Contrast and Brightness. When you’re not in the OSD, you can use the buttons to individually control brightness and speaker volume.

Display Performance on the ViewSonic VG1457

The VG1457 uses twin 14-inch 1200p IPS panels with a standard 60 Hz refresh rate. Both panels are covered with an anti-glare finish to reduce distracting reflections.

ViewSonic says that the panels are rated for up to 300 nits maximum brightness, but that wasn't the case with our review unit. Instead, we saw just 201 nits, ranking it in fourth place of five dual-screen portable monitors that we've recently tested. Only the KYY X90D was dimmer at 181.4 nits at full power.

Color performance was also not up to par compared to its peers; we measured just 44.8 percent coverage of DCI-P3 and 63.2 percent of sRGB. Both figures put it at the back of the pack, and by a large margin.

It's one thing to be able to boast (or not boast) about color performance with instrumented tests, but how does the VG1457 look in real-world applications? For my needs, I spend a lot of time in Word, Excel, Microsoft Edge, and Pixelmator Pro. And for those use cases, it was "fine." Colors weren't particularly vibrant, and I wished that the brightness of the VG1457's panels at least matched the brightness of the native 14-inch display on the OmniBook X that I was using as a test system.

Watching movies was also just an "OK" experience, with muted colors and lots of grey undertones when watching dark scenes.

The VG1457 also includes a pair of 2-watt speakers, which sounded OK. They're serviceable for handling your Google Meet or Zoom calls, or listening to some music in the background while you work. However, they are by no means high-quality speakers that will blow your socks off.

Bottom Line

The ViewSonic VG1457 has a lot of positive qualities that I appreciated. Its relatively compact and lightweight frame (for a dual-screen monitor) is a boon for travel. Many dual-screen monitors are “portable” in name only, and would be a chore to carry around; however, I was able to slip the VG1457 into my laptop backpack with ease. I also like that there are three USB-C ports supporting 65-watt power passthrough to your computer or other peripherals.

On the other hand, color performance and brightness were lackluster compared to the competition. You won’t be happy if you’re looking to use the VG1457 for watching videos or photo editing. Still, for more basic productivity tasks or presenting (which is its primary mission anyway), it’s more than adequate.

Here’s xTool’s second take on an all-in-one craft tool in a box. It isn’t just an iterative update to the xTool M1 Ultra. The new XTool M2 color craft laser and engraver thoroughly remixes the offering. Specifically, it throws out the previous model’s cutting blade and pen options. To compensate, it comes with a 10W diode, a 20W diode, CMYK, and a 2W IR laser head, “cut, print, engrave” options. Very worthy improvements, such as positioning and monitoring cameras, come as standard this time around. Furthermore, the print head offers CMYK inks instead of the washed-out CMY of yore, and laser air assist is included as standard. xTool’s new M2 also works with the RA3 Lite full wrap rotary accessory.

The xTool M2 10W base model is available for $599. This entry price makes the M2 about half the price of last year’s M1 Ultra. But this 10W ‘Standalone’ bundle includes just the machine and a 10W diode laser head. You’ll have to part with $699 (usually $749) for the 10W ‘Color Print & Cut Bundle’, which includes the CMYK print head and a cartridge. Moving up to $939 (usually $989) gets you the 10W Deluxe Bundle.

There are also bundles with the 20W diode laser head costing $400 more per tier (Standard, Color Print & Cut, and Deluxe). xTool also sells various print/cut heads separately, and they’re easily magnetically swappable. For example, it lists the M2 CMYK printing module with an ink cartridge for $169, extra cartridges are $99, and the RA3 Lite is $259. We don’t have prices for a 20W diode head (if you wanted to upgrade later), nor the 3W IR laser head that is shown on the promotional pages for the product.

You might prefer the 20W diode laser for faster, deeper cuts. xTool says it raises the max basswood cutting depth from 8mm to 10mm in one pass. For acrylic, it is much better, raising the cutting thickness from 3mm to 8mm in one pass with the 20W diode laser installed.

The default 10W diode laser supplied will be good enough for cutting and engraving plenty of materials for many crafty users. Officially, the following tabulated materials are cuttable, engravable, and printable.

You will see examples of cutting, engraving, and printing on various materials during our test process below.

As mentioned, the newest Color Craft machine from xTool improves on the older and more expensive model by integrating a pair of positioning and monitoring cameras. There’s also a separate camera for fire hazard monitoring and alerts. Another improvement on the original comes via the integration of air assist for the laser. Fan-powered extraction, with corrugated flexible extendable pipe, is another welcome new standard feature. As with the previous model, we have a laser-safe tinted enclosure lid, which should mean your eyes are adequately protected when the machine runs with the lid closed.

Finally, the newest Color Craft laser from xTool now comes with the excellent xTool Studio software we last used alongside the formidable xTool P3. This is a comprehensive package for laser control and output, as well as for guiding you through wizards, generators, apps, and plenty of projects online. Most projects I completed went easily, from photo and/or illustration and layout to output. I did hit a couple of bugs, but more on that later.

Specifications: xTool M1 Ultra

xTool M2: Included in the Box

The device was well packed, with everything padded and secured nicely for transportation. Moreover, it won’t be that tricky to get it back in the box as it is a simple shape with no machine assembly required.

In addition to the desktop laser chassis, we got the 10W diode head, a power brick and IEC cable with region-appropriate plug, a USB cable to connect a computer (need to set up by cable before using Wi-Fi), a short USB cable to connect the accessory head to the magnetic holder on the gantry, some grease for the transport system, a USB-A to –C adaptor, a hex-driver, masking tape, and a few pieces of material for setup, calibration, and test.

We got the 10W Deluxe Bundle (though in several deliveries, not boxed together). We received the print head and cartridge, the rotary tool, and a few more slivers of sample material.

Design of the xTool M2

xTool has designed the M2 as a fully enclosed box with a laser-safe orange-tinted acrylic top. The machine only operates with the lid closed.

You open the lid to position your work within the 16.7 x 12.5 inches (425 x 318 mm) lasering area. However, please be aware that for multi-stage color craft projects, where you will want to swap between laser and CMYK print heads, the print area is a smaller 13.7 x 11.8 inches (348 x 300 mm). I didn’t have any size/area mismatch surprises during my projects as the software preview made one aware of the overall working areas available.

Swapping tool heads is quick and simple. The heads are magnetic, guided accurately and firmly into place by a trio of short metal rods. Then you connect the provided USB-C cable, which is the perfect length for the job. xTool Studio software is smart enough to know what kind of head is installed, and you should switch to it in the midst of multi-step processes.

A big convenient step up from the prior generation is the integration of cameras into the new machine. There’s one camera in the center of the lid to snap the whole of the bed. Meanwhile, the machine’s gantry-attached head also has a camera on one side, and you can use it for closer detail shots and/or monitoring the cutting/printing work. There’s actually a third camera in one corner, but that is devoted to flame detection. A couple of times during testing, that flame detection paused a job I was working on, with a loud beep. However, checking and resuming didn’t seem to have any impact on the finished job’s quality or accuracy.

The cameras also integrate with xTool Studio to focus correctly on the workpiece surface, and to provide auto-material detection. That second feature works best with xTool-supplied materials which come with a QR code so the software knows exactly what the material properties are.

Other good things about the new M2, compared to the predecessor, are the built-in air assist, which can help with clean engraving and deeper cuts, as well as the provision of a new print head with a dedicated black ink tank. The extra black ink should improve the contrast of the print output and make it closer in quality to a decent modern inkjet printer. We will see about that later in the review.

Assembling the xTool M2

Commissioning the xTool M2 was pleasingly simple. The unit came out of the box fully assembled. All a buyer has to do is carefully take off all the peels and remove strips of tape that hold the lid and other parts in place, and after that, it will be almost ready to go.

Once I got it on the desk, I opened the lid and took out the bits and pieces of xTool supplies to get the machine set up. Everything I needed was here for setup, including USB cables, grease for the gantry movement mechanism, a screwdriver, an exhaust pipe, and various materials that are used during calibration.

With everything plugged in and powered up, and connected to the computer, the xTool Studio software guides you through initial calibration for the magnetically attached head you have installed. As ours came with the 10W diode head in the first package, I calibrated this by following the ‘wizard’ style step-by-step process. It was easy enough to subsequently find the calibration menu again the next day, when the CMYK print module arrived.

Safety Precautions for the xTool M2

We’ve already mentioned that the M2 claims to be Class 1 safe, with its enclosed design stopping accidental exposure to unhindered Class 4 diode laser light. xTool provides documentation and online guidance that users are encouraged to check out to ensure safe operation. Do not try to override the built-in safety, as the diode laser within could damage eyes and burn skin.

Another safety issue with lasers is addressed with the third camera we mentioned previously. This corner camera monitors smoke and flames, which can flare up when some materials are engraved or cut.

Lasers can also create toxic fumes, depending on what they’re engraving and/or cutting. While you can hook up the xTool M2 to various workshop extraction and filtering equipment, it is good that it comes as standard with a powered fan and flexible extending corrugated exhaust pipe. When I positioned my xTool M2 test unit, it was convenient to shove that corrugated hose out of the window. It worked very well during testing, evacuating smoke made when cutting materials quickly and effectively. The exhaust fan is smartly controlled by xTool Studio, which auto-adjusts speed and duration of operation.

Software for xTool M2

Just like with the xTool P3 and the F2 Ultra, the new xTool M2 color craft laser and engraver is designed to work with the free bundled xTool Studio software. The software looks and works like many other bundled laser software suites for engraving, scoring, and cutting tasks, easily applying multiple output settings across several project layers. The familiar illustration style primitives and type handling might be good enough for creating some projects from scratch, but you can also make use of wizard-like apps to guide you through popular tasks like making arrays and grids, and other repeating designs, as well as more complex projects like boxes and jigsaws.

Traditional software-based graphic creating tools are augmented in xTool Studio with AI-driven generators, custom apps, as well as convenient in-UI access to large online project libraries, notably Atomm.

Of course, the xTool Studio software handles the multi-stage workflows that products like the M2 enable. Making hybrid projects that mix color graphic printing, laser engraving, and cutting was a cinch. The software also works great with accessories you might add to xTool M2 bundles like the rotary accessory, and probably the UV laser head (which we didn't get to test this time).

Engraving / Cutting with the xTool M2

Now comes the fun part. I prepared a number of projects that I thought would adequately test the cutting, engraving, and printing prowess of the new xTool M2 color craft laser and engraver, to give it its full title. I started with the laser-toting fan favorite of a plywood surface engrave test.

I got a piece of xTool’s 3mm birch ply, which provides a pale and characterless wood surface for engraving detail and is pretty quick to cut cleanly, even with a 10W diode laser. The first job on the M2 was to output the usual variable speed and power engraving test grid. This provides a good visual light-to-dark shading guide for any later pale wood projects. There are quite a few usable shades here, even at the fastest speed of up to 600 mm/s. The xTool M1 Ultra was limited to 300 mm/s at best.

xTool Studio made setting up the test grid easy with a click-and-go generator. However, my first burn seemed to use the same settings for every ‘X’ so I had to select and type in the appropriate values for each segment and output it again. Thus the generator wasn’t much of a labor saver. Hopefully this bug will be fixed in due course.

I stuck with pure laser output for my first tests. I’ll do CMYK printing and hybrid jobs later. So the next thing I did was try a simple line art engrave onto a slate coaster. You can see the result of this in the images - a stylized silhouette of a tree on stone. The output is very pleasing, and it worked like this first shot using the xTool M2’s rock coaster engraving preset. I didn’t do any special surface preparation or finishing. I just cleaned the slate with a brush before setting off the M2 engrave process.

Next up, I got out my painted aluminum business card blanks. The red one you see in the images was created with the xTool M2. It looks nice and sharp at first glance. Only when you zoom in to high-res images can you see a slight resolution advantage on the black card, which was engraved when I tested the xTool P3 CO2 laser. The red card has slight jaggies under scrutiny.

Satisfied with the engraving so far, I felt it would be good to look more closely at the new CMYK print capabilities. Using art paper supplied by xTool, I printed a colorful flower picture, which you can see positioned in my photo next to the same image on my laptop’s lovely OLED screen. The printed output lacks contrast and pop in comparison, but to be fair to xTool, I hadn’t used special (glossy finish and high-white) photo paper, which would squeeze the best print quality from this kind of inkjet printer module.

What about comparing the xTool CMYK output to a professional lithographic print I had produced a few years back (2007!)? You can see my original illustrated menu was printed on a nice heavy card stock by commercial firm Priority Print. I’d actually say that the xTool’s output is just as nice, but would benefit from being a bit darker/denser. Both prints came from the same PDF file. Apologies for the black circle on the xTool M2’s printout, that’s from a calibration I did earlier.

With two comparison prints produced so far, if I were a perfectionist I’d be tempted to adjust the levels of the xTool print output to be a bit darker and up the contrast.

Now let’s use some of the hybrid output ability of the xTool M2. I saw a project in the xTool Studio library with a wood version of tic tac toe (noughts & crosses) but thought it looked a bit basic, so I fired up Illustrator to make a nicer stylized version, which I dubbed Fridge Tac Toe. I intended to add magnetic pads to the cutout shapes and board and make the game fridge-friendly.

The M2 outputs the color sections with its CMYK head. It then asked me to change to the laser head, and proceeded to cut the shapes, followed by the board. There were a couple of processing wrinkles, but I salvaged the project without issues. Specifically, the laser cut around the inner rounded rectangles twice, and that action accidentally lasered some pieces that had already dropped onto the bed. I’m not sure if it was my source file at issue, the settings, or a software bug. Thankfully, I had decided to cut some spare O's and X's.

Slightly more ambitious, I decided to make a jigsaw from one of my favorite holiday photos. The xTool software generated this for me once fed an image. All I had to do, I thought, was make sure to position it carefully within the common area where printing and lasering can be achieved.

As you can see from my jigsaw-making gallery, the first attempt wasted a sheet of plywood and plenty of ink. For some reason with this first attempt, the jigsaw lines were printed on top of the image – not necessary. Also, the run order ruined the project. The machine cut the outer frame of the jigsaw first. This caused the center (what would have become the jigsaw pieces) to fall immediately down onto the metal bed, which is about 6 or 7 mm lower than the standoffs that had been holding the wood sheet up. Thus the laser wasn’t focused to cut, and even if it had been capable of cutting, we’d get a lot of burn on the back of the piece due to a lack of air gap under the work.

After aborting the beach photo jigsaw, I picked another holiday photo featuring a yacht and ran the jigsaw generator again. This time I edited the resulting project work on the xTool Studio canvas. I selected the outer frame cut and made sure it would be the last action of the laser by putting it on its own last-in-order layer. This ensured the layers would be processed in the following order: photo print, jigsaw pieces cut, jigsaw pieces outer frame cut. This worked nicely, with a very handsome and accurately cut working jigsaw at the end. Using a ‘honeycomb’ cutting bed would have been better for this style of job.

Another hybrid job I output was some stickers for the grandkids. These cartoon illustration versions of photos were generated by an AI tool, and I used the xTool Studio to generate offset cutting forms to match each one.

I couldn’t find a preset for this kind of sticker cut out in the xTool software. That was a surprise, as I saw lots of stickers in promotional material. Anyway, printing looked great, and my guestimated laser cutting using one pass at 15% power and 15mm/s speed was perfect. It cut the stickers cleanly without cutting the backing material.

My final project made use of the supplied RA3 Lite rotary accessory. It was a bit fiddly to install and it meant fixing a different magnetic head adapter to change the orientation of the printer / laser (see images). Also, the xTool M2’s camera positioning functions stopped being useful when in this mode.

I planned to engrave some terracotta plant pots, one for pencils, one for herbs. So, I prepared some line art logos for this labeling purpose, and then imported them into xTool Studio. There I selected the rotary output option for the M2, and followed the steps to measure the usable (engravable) surface and its slope / profile.

Multiple grip adaptors are provided with the RA3 Lite rotary chuck, so I could turn the work around and then engrave the plant pot rim. That was an important technique to get used to, because you can’t engrave close up to the chuck. I think the user-addressable zone of the work in the chuck starts about an inch away from the chuck jaws, probably to prevent head/chuck jaw collisions.

Finally, I got some pretty nice results with the laser engraving of terracotta, so I’m pleased with the handsome textured finish which you can see in my gallery.

Bottom Line

I found the xTool M2 to be a great one-stop shop for craft projects. Most of the ideas I had for cool things to make went from ideation to finished output with very little friction from the machine or bundled software. Lots and lots more projects using a far wider range of materials (check the above chart) are possible. Moreover, xTool Studio’s built-in generators, AI, and integration with project libraries via Atomm make it easy to get more inspiration even if you don’t paint, illustrate, or DIY design.

From looking at the print samples from the M1 Ultra, I’m certain the CMYK output from the M2 is much better and more usable for hobbyists. If you were to do a lot of print work, or something like a production run, I think it would be worthwhile tweaking to optimize contrast, though. Remember it is inkjet, too, so the print surface makes a lot of difference, and you may have to lacquer the surface after printing to make it moderately splash-proof.

The entry-level pricing of $599 looks like a good move from xTool. Adding $150 for the CMYK head and a cartridge doesn’t seem exorbitant – until you realize ink refills are $99. This so-called ‘Color Print and Cut Bundle’ makes the most sense to get the best of the xTool M2’s most attractive features from day one.

While the 10W (default) and 20W diode laser heads are very flexible across use cases and materials, those with a particular interest in metal projects (and some plastic types) might like to add the 3W IR laser head. I’ve heard that’s an extra $499, though, so you’d really have to have a few important projects in mind to pay almost the same price as the M2 laser alone.

The xTool M2 deserves a place in our list of the Best Laser Cutters and Engravers. However, if the added flexibility of this all-in-one print and cut machine isn’t something that tempts you, there may be better choices. For example, our recommended xTool S1 with a 40W diode laser head can get things done quicker and cut deeper for not a lot more than the M2 20W.

The latest cooler on our test bench is the Sigma L36 Pro, a high-end AIO with a 3.5-inch display from relative cooling newcomer Ocypus. This manufacturer is known for quirky design choices that help set it apart from its many competitors. I found the company’s Iota C70 computer case and A62 digital air cooler especially interesting products when I tested them last year.

Like many other AIOs we’ve reviewed lately, the Sigma L36 Pro features a display – a large 3.5-inch detachable screen in this case, capable of displaying performance metrics and animated images and video.

Screen aside, the technical specifications of the product are impressive. The static pressure exerted by the fans is nearly twice as strong as many competitors – rated for up to 5.8 mmH20. But even more impressive than this is the price of the liquid cooler: Despite having a relatively large display and extremely powerful fans, you can find this cooler selling for $135 or less.

Let's take a look at the specifications and features of this eye-catching AIO, then we’ll go over thermal and noise benchmarks so you can decide if the Ocypus Sigma L36 Pro deserves to make our list of the best CPU coolers.

Cooler specifications

Features of Ocypus Sigma L36 Pro

▶️ Detachable 3.5-inch 640x480 resolution IPS display

It seems like the biggest trend in liquid cooling recently is AIOs with fancy displays on top of the CPU block, and Ocypus rides this trend, including a 3.5-inch IPS screen here that some users might find reminiscent of older PCs due to it’s VGA (640x480) resolution and 4:3 aspect ratio.

Many AIOs have the screen built into the CPU block, like Hyte’s THICC Q60. Other manufacturers offer the display and CPU block as separate components, and that’s how the Ocypus Sigma L36 Pro is designed.

When a display connects to the PC, but isn’t actually built into the CPU block, this opens up customization options that you might not think of normally. As you can see in the photograph above, I’ve got the display set up on a stool next to my computer desk, instead of inside my case. You’ll have to obtain a 9-pin header to USB-A (or C) adapter to use the device externally, but these can usually be found for less than $10.

To control and customize the display, you’ll need to download the simply named Ocypus Display software. It’s a surprisingly small download size of only 184 megabytes, and uses 493 MB when installed – and about the same amount of RAM when active.

Multiple preset themes are available, but only three are installed by default.

If you click the cloud icon shown in the picture above, a link to Ocypus' “Download Center” is opened in your default browser, which offers more options.

The software is extremely simple to use and easy to create your own customized theme with. In the example above, I uploaded an animated GIF file of a happy puppy and set the display to monitor CPU temperature, power consumption, and fan speeds metrics through text labels. I’ve also set up monitoring of CPU utilization, both with a text label showing the current status and a line graph showing the changes in CPU utilization over time.

▶️ RAM Clearance

As with most liquid coolers, the design of this AIO is such that the CPU block as such that it doesn’t overhang or interfere with the DIMM slots in any manner, ensuring that all sticks of compatible RAM, no matter how tall, will fit with this cooler.

▶️ Thick CPU cold plate

This AIO is designed for normal PC platforms like Intel’s Arrow Lake and LGA1851 socket or AMD’s Ryzen X3D CPUs and the AM5 socket, but you might wonder if it supports server products when you see the size of the coldplate – it has a larger surface area and greater thickness than most liquid coolers designed for consumer PCs.

▶️ 120mm fans

There’s more to a cooler than just the radiator and liquid pump. The included fans have a direct impact on aesthetics, noise levels, and overall thermal performance. Conveniently, the fans here arrive pre-installed, saving a few moments of time when you put things together. The fans included in this model are white, but this cooler is also available with black fans.

These fans seem to be overbuilt, more powerful than the rest of the AIO can properly take advantage of. They are rated for an unusually high 5.8 MMH20 of static pressure and 90 CFM at full speed.

▶️ Packaging

The outer packaging is a bit flashy, at least in comparison to your normal AIO box. It features a rendering of the cooler against a black background with streaks of purple hues – logos on all sides of the box for full marketing impact.

The inner packaging is just as fresh as the outside, with each component of the cooling system well protected from the chaos that shipping can bring by using a combination of soft covers and individual cardboard walls for each component.

Included with the package are:

• Mounting hardware for AMD and Intel platforms
• Tubing clips
• A small tube of thermal paste
• 360mm radiator and 120mm fans
• 3.5-inch LCD display

AM5 Installation

This section assumes you’ve already mounted the 360mm radiator. Installation of AIOs is typically much easier when you have already secured the radiator to your computer case. To begin putting things together, you’ll first need to remove the default AM4/5 retention hardware.

The next step is to screw in the mounting studs, as shown below.

Now you’ll want to apply the included thermal paste. If you’re not sure how to do that, we have a handy thermal paste application guide that covers the different methods you can use.

After thermal paste is applied, take the CPU block and press it against the studs, using the included screws and a screwdriver to secure it in place.

I chose to attach the included 3.5-inch screen externally, but if you want to place it in your case, this is the time to put it on top of your CPU block. The final step, of course, is to connect the cables and turn on your computer when finished.

Real-world testing configuration – AMD AM5 platform

We’ve tested coolers with both the Ryzen 9950X3D and its non-V-Cache sibling, the 9950X. There are some differences in how the 9950X and 9950X3D CPUs are impacted by thermal events. While the heat output of the CCDs of AMD’s 9950X3D is relatively balanced, the 9950X I used has one CCD that runs much hotter than the other, with a difference of over 10 degrees Celsius in some scenarios, shown below.

We’ve since returned to using a 9950X3D for cooler testing, as it has a more balanced heat profile, and is almost certainly a more widely adopted CPU. The benchmark results shared in these reviews may differ from others because I emphasize results that are comparable to real-world use. This means I generally test CPU coolers inside of a closed desktop case, which increases cooling difficulty compared to other testing methods.

Many reviewers test coolers on open test benches, which have a combination of lesser airflow needs and lowered ambient temperatures. This results in making weak coolers appear stronger than they really are. Some publications have also used generic thermal plates to test cooling solutions. I reject both of these methods because they don’t accurately reflect real-world cooler conditions.

Our latest testing setup uses the FLOVA F50 computer case from Tryx.

This case features a unique “crossflow” fan that pulls air from the side, which the company claims is more effective than traditional intake fans. For air cooling tests, we’ve added a single Noctua NF-A12 G2 intake fan.

PBO Performance and maximum noise levels

We’re going to start this review’s benchmark section by focusing on a traditional maximum performance test, with the CPU cooler’s fans allowed to reach their fastest speeds, for the best cooling possible.

Turning on PBO allows AMD’s Ryzen 9 9950X3D to stretch its legs to an extent and consume over 260W. Enabling PBO enables high power consumption and heat output, when using MSI’s X870E Carbon Wifi motherboard, the CPU will reach its TJ Max (peak temperature) of 95 degrees C (203 F) and thermally throttle to some extent with most coolers. When this throttling occurs, I’ve measured the average power consumption to determine performance.

High-end AIO liquid coolers have higher expectations in this benchmark, and are expected to be able to keep AMD’s Ryzen 9 9950X3D under TJ Max during the duration of the benchmark – in these cases, we compare the CPU’s actual temperature.

Ocypus’ Sigma L36 Pro performs well and is capable of keeping the CPU cool in this test, with an average temperature of 85.7C/186.3F.

Some coolers perform well in maximum strength tests, but run loudly at full speeds. Noisy fans in this scenario aren’t necessarily a bad thing; some folks prefer to hear them as a way to be aware when the CPU is getting hot.

The fans included with Ocypus’ Sigma L36 Pro reach 49.8 dBA at 100% RPM, which is loud, but to be expected of fans with 5.8mm H20 of air pressure. Those who prefer to implement speed restrictions for silent operation need not worry; our noise-normalized benchmarks show good performance even when the fans are set to run quietly.

200W thermal benchmarks

For the next thermal test, I leave the motherboard settings at their defaults, which results in a power limit of 200W when running Cinebench R23.

When compared to the other seven AIOs we’ve tested Ocypus Sigma L36 Pro against, its performance is behind most of its peers. That said, the gap between Ocypus’ AIO and the top performer is rather small – the average temperature of 70.5C (48.5C above ambient) achieved by the Sigma L36 Pro is only 2.1C behind our best result.

150W + GPU thermal results, noise levels

Our next test runs Cinebench on the CPU with a 150W power limit, while also running Furmark on MSI’s RTX 4070 Ti Super Ventus 3x OC. This causes the GPU to consume ~295W of power. This test is designed to emulate the thermals of games, which primarily stress the CPU and GPU.

Ocypus’ position in this thermal test remains the same as in our previous chart. When tied to the default fan curve of MSI’s X870E Carbon motherboard, it reaches a mild volume level of 41.9 dBA.

Noise-normalized testing

Most testing is performed with the cooler tied to the default fan curve of our MSI X870E Carbon motherboard, but some of y’all prefer to see tests when the noise levels of coolers are equalized. This is especially important to those of you who prefer silent computers. This next test has the CPU cooler noise-normalized to 38.9 dBA, with PBO enabled for the Ryzen 9 9950X3D CPU.Most coolers will not be able to keep the CPU from reaching its peak temperature (TJ Max) in this stress test. So we’ll look at this in terms of average CPU power consumption, which averaged 255.4 watts.

This test is especially difficult because in addition to the reduced noise from the CPU cooler, our current test bench’s system fans are configured to run extremely silently, below the floor of the noise meter I use to measure dBA.

Conclusion

Ocypus’ Sigma L36 Pro features an attractive combination of features, including a fancy 3.5-inch LCD display. Those things alone make this AIO interesting and worth considering, but it’s also affordable, with a regular price of only $135, and often on sale for less. In fact, as this review was wrapping up, the black version of the Sigma L36 Pro was on sale at Amazon for just $105. At that price, it’s inarguably a CPU-cooling steal.

Unfazed by the ongoing memory shortage, G.Skill has launched the Trident Z5 NeoX RGB DDR5-6000 C30 memory kit, equipped with AMD's EXPO Ultra Low Latency (ULL) feature, to position it as a serious contender among the best RAM options.

EXPO 1.2 may seem like a minor specification update, but ULL is nothing to sneeze at. Among all the features, it brings a new level of optimization of memory sub-timings that were previously neglected. These memory sub-timings are key to increasing the performance on Ryzen processors. Standard AMD EXPO memory kits typically leave these memory sub-timings alone for the sake of broader compatibility. However, new EXPO ULL-certified memory kits, like the Trident Z5 NeoX RGB DDR5-6000 C30, leverage these secondary and tertiary memory sub-timings to unlock additional performance from AMD's Ryzen chips.

If you have seen one Trident Z5 memory module, you have seen them all because every new Trident series that comes out follows a similar design recipe as the very first Trident DDR5 memory modules. This is not necessarily a bad thing, though. The design has been a winning formula for G.Skill's Trident Z5 memory modules, and it has resonated well among enthusiasts.

In the case of the Trident Z5 NeoX, G.Skill went with a single-color exterior. Depending on the SKU, the memory modules are available in matte black, matte white, or a sleek glossy black finish. Regardless of which colorway you choose, the overall design language remains largely identical. The only subtle difference lies in the logo placement. On the glossy black variant, the logo is on the right side, while on the matte versions, it resides in the center of the memory module.

Since it essentially utilizes the standard blueprint for every Trident Z5 memory module, the NeoX maintains a height of 1.65 inches (42mm). You are unlikely to run into clearance issues with large CPU air coolers. When it comes to aesthetics, the only RGB lighting present is the diffused light bar running along the top edge of the memory module. G.Skill provides its proprietary Trident Z Lighting Control software for customization, but you can use the motherboard software suites from all major brands, including Asus Aura Sync, Gigabyte RGB Fusion 2.0, MSI Mystic Light Sync, or ASRock Polychrome Sync.

It is a dual-channel memory kit, so each memory module is 16GB in capacity. The memory modules employ a black PCB with a single-sided design and a single-rank layout. There are eight integrated circuits (ICs), each with a capacity of 2GB, on one side of the PCB. The ICs themselves are H5CG48MEBD-X014 (M-die) from SK hynix and are well-regarded in the overclocking community. The power management integrated circuit (PMIC), which handles the power delivery, is from ANPEC, specifically the APW8502C-VBA50.

Like most enthusiast-grade memory kits, the Trident Z5 NeoX modules default to the JEDEC DDR5-4800 specification, with relaxed timings of 40-40-70 to ensure maximum compatibility. Since it is a memory kit for AMD systems, there are only EXPO profiles onboard. The primary EXPO profile corresponds to ULL, and it is clearly labeled as such within the BIOS for easy identification. It will set memory to DDR5-6000 speeds with 30-38-38-23 timings at 1.35V. The secondary EXPO profile keeps the data rate and operating voltage the same but dials back the tRAS to 96 clock cycles, probably to enhance stability for users who cannot get the ULL profile to work. See our PC Memory 101 feature and How to Shop for RAM story for more timings and frequency considerations.

Comparison Hardware

The Intel system features the Core Ultra 9 285K processor and the MSI MEG Z890 Unify-X motherboard with firmware version 7E20v1AA0. Conversely, the AMD system utilizes the Ryzen 9 9900X processor and the MSI MPG X870E Carbon WiFi motherboard with firmware version 7E49v1AA3. The Corsair iCUE Link Titan 360 RX LCD CPU liquid-cooling solution efficiently maintains optimal temperatures for both the Arrow Lake and Zen 5 processors, ensuring efficient thermal management across platforms.

The MSI GeForce RTX 4080 16GB Gaming X Trio efficiently handles demanding graphics workloads, preventing any bottlenecks during our gaming RAM benchmarks. The TeamGroup A440 Lite PCIe 4.0 SSD balances performance and capacity, delivering 2TB of ultra-fast storage with speeds up to 7,400 MB/s—perfect for Windows 11 24H2 installations, benchmarking software, and gaming applications.

The Corsair RM1000x Shift ATX 3.0 power supply delivers reliable and ample power to our test systems, directly supporting the GeForce RTX 4080 via its native 16-pin (12VHPWR) cable. The Streacom BC1 open-air test bench offers flexible, tool-free accommodation for all hardware components, streamlining assembly and component swaps.

Intel Performance

The results from our testing clearly demonstrated that the NeoX does not perform to its full potential when paired with an Intel-based system. The NeoX specifically targets AMD platforms, so the ULL optimizations are not available on an Intel system. That is not to say that the NeoX was slow.

On the contrary, even without access to ULL, the NeoX proved to be a strong competitor. It performed well in the 7-Zip compression workload, where it was up to 7% faster than the slowest memory kit. However, there are better and more affordable options for Intel users, such as the Vengeance RGB DDR5-6000 C30, the Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6000 C32, or the Deltaα RGB DDR5-6000 C38.

AMD Performance

It was a different story entirely when on an AMD platform, an environment where the NeoX thrived. On average, the NeoX posted results that were 3% faster than the Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 C30, its non-ULL counterpart, and 9% faster than the Lancer RGB DDR5-6000 C40, one of the first DDR5 memory kits when the standard debuted. While a 3% to 9% performance lead appears modest, it is important to highlight that some workloads benefited more than others, which balances out the average.

The advantages of ULL memory like the NeoX extend into gaming, but the degree of improvement heavily depends on the game. For example, in games such as Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora and Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, the NeoX was right in the alley of the non-ULL competitors. In Assassin’s Creed Mirage, the NeoX showed an 8% uplift in average frame rates and a 10% improvement in 1% lows compared to the Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 C30. Watch Dogs: Legion exhibited a similar pattern, with the NeoX delivering 8% higher average frame rates and 10% better 1% lows than its non-ULL equivalent.

Overclocking and Latency Tuning

One of the upsides of the NeoX memory kit is that it operates at the standard 1.35V commonly used by enthusiast-grade DDR5. It provides substantial headroom for those willing to experiment with overclocking. During our testing, we found that a modest bump of just 0.05V, from 1.35V to 1.40V, enabled us to stabilize the memory kit at DDR5-6200 while maintaining the same tight timings as DDR5-6000 (32-38-38-32).

The NeoX memory kit already ships with very tight timings. Nonetheless, we were curious to see how much further these timings could operate without compromising system stability. Using the same 1.4V DRAM voltage as our previous overclocking endeavor, we methodically decrementally lower the memory timings. The only stable reduction we could achieve was with tRCD and tRP, which we were able to lower by two clock cycles.

Bottom Line

There is no denying that the Trident Z5 NeoX RGB DDR5-6000 C30 is at the top echelon of DDR5 memory kits for the AMD platform. The memory kit targets the very hardcore hardware enthusiast who wants to maximize performance from their AMD processor and does not want to tinker with a standard memory kit, but more importantly, is not afraid to pay for it. While the ULL memory kit will not post double-digit uplifts, it is still important to keep expectations in check as the level of improvement over a standard memory kit varies significantly based on your combination of hardware, and remember that ULL is more for the vanilla Ryzen chip as X3D parts are unlikely to experience any perceptible gains.

Like countless other DDR5 memory kits released during this historic memory shortage, the Trident Z5 NeoX RGB DDR5-6000 C30 also falls victim to the circumstances. The memory kit launches at $629.99, so it would be wise to wait for prices to stabilize before picking one up. However, for users putting a new AMD system together from scratch or looking to upgrade their memory and want unbeatable performance at this very moment, the Trident Z5 NeoX RGB DDR5-6000 C30 is in a league of its own.

Unlike some of its cooler competitors, Chiba Japan-based Scythe is a fabless company that partners with factories in China and Taiwan for manufacturing of its air coolers, fans, and other PC hardware. The company has been delivering cooling products aimed largely at quiet performance for more than 20 years. We’ve enjoyed testing its previous products, like the fan-favorite FUMA 3 air cooler. Today we’re looking at Scythe’s latest offering, the Magoroku – a dual tower heatsink paired with two of Scythe’s Wonder Tornado 120 fans.

Let's take a look at the specifications and features of this CPU cooler. Then we’ll go over thermal and noise benchmarks to see if the Magoroku deserves to make our list of the best CPU coolers.

Cooler specifications

Features of the Scythe Magoroku air cooler

▶️ Dual tower heatsinks, six copper heatpipes

This air cooler features a dual-tower design, with six copper heatpipes to move heat from the CPU block into the metal fins above.

▶️ RAM Clearance

RAM compatibility with this cooler depends on how you look at it. Officially, Scythe mentions support for RAM up to 57mm tall. However, using the fan with tall RAM in this configuration does result in some performance loss.

We instead recommend moving the front fan to the back of the unit, above your motherboard’s VRM heatsinks, for best thermal performance. This configuration also has the side effect of complete RAM compatibility, as nothing interferes with or overhangs the DIMM slots.

▶️ 120mm Wonder Tornado fans

There's more to a cooler than just the heatsink. The included fans have a direct impact on aesthetics, noise levels, and overall thermal performance. Scythe includes two of its Wonder Tornado 120 fans with the Magoroku air cooler.

▶️ Packaging

The outer packaging highlights the design of the product in a flashy but subtle way, incorporating a black background with grey and white highlights.

The CPU cooler and fans are protected by molded foam and cardboard inserts.

Included with the package are:

● Mounting hardware for AMD and Intel platforms

● Three sets of fan clips

● A small tube of thermal paste

● Two 120mm Wonder Tornado fans

● Screwdriver

AM5 Installation

To begin putting things together, you’ll need to first remove the default AM4/5 retention mechanism. Next, place the studs over the exposed holes.

Afterwards, take the mounting bars and secure them with the included screws and screwdriver.

It’s time to apply the thermal compound. If you’re not sure how to do that, we have a handy thermal paste application guide that covers the best methods you can use.

After thermal paste is applied, take the CPU block and press it against the mounting bars, using the built-in screws and screwdriver to secure it in place.

Finally, you’ll want to attach both fans using the clips included with the cooler and connect them to the motherboard’s PWM header. If you have tall system RAM, I advise moving the front fan and placing it in the rear for best thermal performance.

Real-world testing configuration on AMD’s AM5 platform

We’ve tested coolers with both the Ryzen 9950X3D and its non-V-Cache sibling, the 9950X. There are some differences in how the 9950X and 9950X3D CPUs are impacted by thermal events. While the heat output of the CCDs of AMD’s 9950X3D is relatively balanced, the 9950X I used has one CCD that runs much hotter than the other, with a difference of over 10 degrees Celsius in some scenarios, shown below.

We’ve since returned to using a 9950X3D for cooler testing, as it has a more balanced heat profile, and is almost certainly a more widely adopted CPU. The benchmark results shared in these reviews may differ from others because I emphasize results that are comparable to real-world use. This means I generally test CPU coolers inside of a closed desktop case, which increases cooling difficulty compared to other testing methods.

Many reviewers test coolers on open test benches, which have a combination of lesser airflow needs and lowered ambient temperatures. This results in making weak coolers appear stronger than they really are. Some publications have also used generic thermal plates to test cooling solutions. I reject both of these methods because they don’t accurately reflect real-world cooler conditions.

Our latest testing setup uses the FLOVA F50 computer case from Tryx.

This case features a unique “crossflow” fan that pulls air from the side, which the company claims is more effective than traditional intake fans. For air cooling tests, we’ve added a single Noctua NF-A12 G2 intake fan.

We’re going to start this review’s benchmark section by focusing on a traditional maximum performance test, with the CPU cooler’s fans allowed to reach their fastest speeds, for the best cooling possible.

Turning on PBO allows AMD’s Ryzen 9 9950X3D to stretch its legs to an extent and consume over 260W. Enabling PBO enables high power consumption and heat output, when using MSI’s X870E Carbon Wifi motherboard the CPU will reach its TJ Max (peak temperature) of 95 degrees C (203 F) and thermally throttle to some extent with most coolers. When this throttling occurs, I’ve measured the average power consumption to determine performance.

You’ll notice there are two results for Scythe’s Magoroku here. The first result is with an intake fan above our test rig’s TeamGroup DDR5 (as Scythe suggests); the second result is with that fan placed on the back above the motherboard’s VRM modules. As you can see, it’s better to move the front fan to the back if your system incorporates tall RAM modules. That said, neither result is particularly impressive. These are the worst results we’ve seen on our latest test bench.

Some coolers perform well in maximum strength tests, but run loudly at full speeds. Noisy fans in this scenario aren’t necessarily a bad thing; some prefer to hear them as a way to be aware when the CPU is getting hot. Scythe’s Magoroku has a maximum volume level of 43.4 dBA, which is on the quieter end of the fan noise spectrum.

200W thermal benchmarks

For the next thermal test, I leave the motherboard settings at their defaults, which results in a power limit of 200W when running Cinebench R23. The results here are slightly better than the last test, but not by much. The Scythe was the second-warmest cooler we’ve seen on this test bench.

150W + GPU thermal results

Our next test runs Cinebench on the CPU with a 150W power limit, while also running Furmark on MSI’s RTX 4070 Ti Super Ventus 3x OC. This causes the GPU to consume ~295W of power. This test is designed to emulate the thermals of games, which primarily stress the CPU and GPU.

We’ve got another fairly disappointing result here, with a CPU temperature of 69.9C (47.9C over ambient) – the thermal performance is again in last place. Noise levels in our 150W CPU thermal test were acceptable, though, reaching 39.6 dBA.

It’s worth pointing out that some games are more intensive than this test above. While playing Assassin’s Creed: Odyssey, I regularly noticed temperatures reaching near TJ Max. This is a bit concerning.

Noise-normalized testing

Most testing is performed with the cooler tied to the default fan curve of our MSI X870E Carbon motherboard, but some of y’all prefer to see tests when the noise levels of coolers are equalized. This is especially important to those of you who prefer silent computers. This next test has the CPU cooler noise-normalized to 38.9 dBA, with PBO enabled for the Ryzen 9 9950X3D CPU.

This test is especially difficult because, in addition to the reduced noise from the CPU cooler, our current test bench’s system fans are configured to run extremely silently, below the floor of the noise meter I use to measure dBA.

Most coolers, particularly air coolers, can’t keep the CPU from reaching its peak temperature (TJ Max) in this stress test. We’ll look at this in terms of power consumption, which averaged 228.7 watts. I wish I could say more positive things about this cooler’s thermal performance, but it just doesn’t seem to perform very well with an AMD Ryzen 9950X3D CPU.

Karhu DDR5 RAM thermals testing

Your CPU cooler does not operate in isolation. It has an impact on not just your CPU’s temperatures, but also the other components in your build, like your RAM and GPU. To that end, I’ve run the Karhu RAM stress test. This places a load of ~153W on the CPU and ensures system RAM (DDR5 in my case) is fully stable. In this type of scenario, most AIOs tend to produce worse results than air coolers.

While the rest of our test results weren’t very impressive, Scythe’s Magoroku performed well when it came to keeping system DDR5 temperatures under control, measuring at an average of 43C (21C over ambient), tied for our second-place result in this benchmark if you don’t count Silverstone’s AIO with extra VRM fans.

Conclusion

Scythe’s Magoroku is a nice-looking cooler with moderately low noise levels. But most of our thermal results were underwhelming with our AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D test bench. The exception to this was DDR5 RAM temperatures, which were impressive. If you’re looking for a low-noise air cooler that effectively cools your system memory, you might be happy with this product.

Perhaps this cooler performs better on Intel systems, but for AMD users, I’d instead recommend Thermalright’s Royal Pretor 130 at this price point.

Since the advent of fixed-pixel flat panel displays, the quest for greater pixel density has not subsided. In times past, a high-res display was 1280x1024 with a 4:3 aspect ratio. Now the gold standard is 4K, 3840x2160. So, where do we go from here?

Traditionally, resolution increases in whole multiples like 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. And there are a few 8K 7680x4320 screens out there. But in the realm of the best gaming monitors, you can have any resolution you want, so why not 6K?

Samsung’s Odyssey G80HS is a 32-inch IPS panel with 6144x3456 pixels at 165 Hz and 3072x1728 pixels at 330 Hz along with Adaptive-Sync, HDR10, and wide gamut color. Pixel density is an impressive 224 or 112 ppi. Let’s take a look.

Samsung Odyssey G80HS Specs

I’ll start with the caveat: the G80HS requires the latest port specification, DisplayPort 2.1 or HDMI 2.1, to run in 6K at 165 Hz. You’ll also need an HDMI cable rated for 48 Gbps, or a DisplayPort cable rated for 80Gbps. You’ll also need a GeForce RTX 5090 to even dream of running over 120fps in 6K. That’s where the dual mode function comes in. Though 3072x1728 is unusual, it is a realistic task for an RTX 5090 or an RTX 4090 to move things along at 240 fps or more. That 330 Hz refresh rate is handy to have.

The panel uses Fast IPS technology with a claimed 1ms response time. It includes Adaptive-Sync and overdrive, but you can’t have both at the same time. I’ll talk more about that later. The good part is that input lag is extremely low, so gamers will get a responsive experience. And running at the higher refresh rate eliminates nearly all motion blur.

The panel doesn’t employ Quantum Dots but manages to cover just over 90% of DCI-P3 with solid out-of-box accuracy. With a few tweaks, I saw reference-level color, gamma and grayscale tracking. The G80HS also has an equally accurate sRGB mode for graphics pros, photographers, and users who want the correct BT.709 color space for SDR content. HDR10 signals are supported as well with expanded contrast and peak white levels around 480 nits.

The G80HS is clearly a gaming monitor with extras like LED lighting, aiming points and game-specific picture modes. You get all the latest video ports too with DisplayPort 2.1 and two HDMI 2.1 inputs. There are USBs for peripherals and a 3.5mm headphone jack. The only thing missing are internal speakers.

Bleeding-edge resolution doesn’t come cheap, but the G80HS isn’t super pricey either at $1,599 to start. Let’s see how it performs.

Assembly and Accessories

The G80HS arrives packed in crumbly foam with a base, upright, and panel that assembles easily, no tools needed. A medium-sized power brick with right-angled cords provides the alternating current, and you get very thick HDMI and DisplayPort cables which are rated for 48 and 80 Gbps respectively.

Product 360

The G80HS has a minimalist aesthetic with only a tiny Samsung logo on the front bezel. The rest of the frame is flush and thin. Coupled with a very slim side profile, one might think they’re looking at an OLED. Internal bits are packed into a central bulge which has generous ventilation. The stand’s fulcrum is ringed by an LED that can play a variety of effects and colors.

The stand is substantial with firm movements and generous adjustments. You get a five-inch height range plus 2/25 degrees tilt and 30 degrees swivel. There’s a 90-degree portrait mode as well. The base has a medium footprint and brings plenty of stability. I noted that the fulcrum had a little wobble when adjusting tilt and rotation.

The screen has an effective anti-glare coating with a matte finish. It is grain-free and provides excellent clarity for the extreme 224ppi pixel density. You’ll need a magnifying glass to see any dot structure from any distance. Sharp and smooth is almost an understatement.

The I/O panel includes a DisplayPort 2.1 and two HDMI 2.1 ports. All of them can manage 6K resolution at 165 Hz if your video card has DisplayPort 2.1 or HDMI 2.1 outputs. USB 3.2 ports are also included, one upstream and two downstream.

OSD Features

The G80HS has a super-efficient OSD that’s controlled by a joystick. A quick menu pops up on the first press, then you click up and select to see the full menu.

Samsung’s gaming monitors all have this cool control-panel-looking menu with signal info at the top in little portholes and a tree-style menu. The G80HS has four sub-menus starting with game options. You can toggle Adaptive-Sync, which is good because if you want overdrive, it must be turned off. This is an unusual choice because at 165fps, you’re going to want both things. The choice is less motion blur or no frame tears. And that will depend on game type. I’ll talk more about that below.

The Dual Mode option switches between 6K at 165 Hz and 3K at 330 Hz. Given my experience, users will be using the 3K mode more often for twitchy shooters and the 6K mode for less frenetic titles. For aiming help, you get two different reticles. And the lighting, called Infinity Core, can play different colors and effects through the LED ring in the back. CoreSync lets you sync the light show with what’s happening on the screen.

The Picture menu starts with 10 picture modes, with Graphic being the default and best choice for all-around gameplay and productivity. It leaves calibration controls accessible and has an Auto color space option which selects sRGB for SDR and DCI-P3 for HDR. This is something I wish more wide-gamut monitors had. For adjustments, you get gamma presets and a very precise set of RGB sliders.

To enhance contrast, there are three different options: Local Dimming, Contrast Enhancer, and Dynamic Brightness. Local Dimming is a bit misleading because the G80HS is not a full-array panel. And tests showed me that it doesn’t do zone-edge dimming either. The best of the three for expanding dynamic range is Dynamic Brightness. That will deliver almost 15,000:1 contrast versus the panel’s native ratio of around 1,700:1. In HDR mode, you can opt for dynamic tone mapping, which improves the image in most cases. I noted that in testing, the Static mode produced reference-level accuracy. You can read more about that on page five.

Samsung Odyssey G80HS Calibration Settings

The G80HS is close to standard out of the box and will display its full native color gamut, 90% of DCI-P3, for both SDR and HDR content. The Picture menu has a single-point RGB control which is very precise. I used it to tighten up grayscale tracking. Gamma is nearly perfect on the zero setting. If you want sRGB for SDR content, change the Color Space option to Auto. Then the monitor will switch back and forth automatically. My recommended settings are below. I noted that I could adjust the RGB sliders independently for HDR mode, and as it turned out, the same settings worked. This is something very few HDR monitors allow.

Gaming and Hands-on

Gaming on the G80HS was a unique experience. On the positive side, it’s the first dual-refresh monitor that I can call truly useful because its resolution only reduces to 3072x1728, which equates to 112 ppi, a tad more than a 27-inch QHD screen. And my GeForce RTX 4090 ran it at around 250 fps, which eliminated any need for Adaptive-Sync or overdrive.

This was fortunate because, as I discovered, playing in HDR mode grays out both options. In essence, you get no video processing with dual mode engaged, but don’t be dismayed. Motion resolution was superb, and the G80HS was super responsive to control inputs. You’ll see why when you read the input lag test results on the next page.

Playing in 6K was not as fun with my setup. An RTX 4090 is fine for 4K where I can get speeds over 200fps. But at full resolution, I could barely crack 100 fps. And with Adaptive-Sync and overdrive out of the picture, motion was just too blurry. There was no hit to input lag; control response was instantaneous. But it was hard to aim precisely at distant targets because unless I stopped moving, enemies were too difficult to make out.

Gameplay experiences aside, the G80HS is gorgeous to look at. With 224 ppi, the picture is uncannily smooth. I could not see the pixels even with my nose next to the screen. Though 4K looks very film-like and realistic, 6K is even more so. It amps up my anticipation and desire for 8K, which will inevitably be a thing within my lifetime.

Working on documents and graphics is such a pleasure when detail and clarity are this high. Though I usually crow more about contrast… Oh wait, the G80HS has a good deal of that. True that it’s IPS, but it delivers around 1,700:1 natively and almost 15,000:1 with Dynamic Brightness engaged. Though it isn’t quite in OLED territory, it is visibly superior to the average LCD panel, and that includes Mini LED monitors with their full-array backlights. The G80HS’s HDR is particularly excellent with balanced color, perfect luminance tracking, and peak highlights around 480 nits.

Takeaway: Though the G80HS’s resolution is somewhat of an “in-between” proposition, there’s no denying its appeal. 224ppi is serious pixel density, and it manifests itself as a super smooth and lifelike picture. Coupled with excellent contrast and pro-level color accuracy, it delivers a truly useful dual-refresh feature where you can play at 330fps at 3K resolution, which equates to 112ppi. So, if you can’t drive it at 6K/165 Hz yet, you can still enjoy it until the next generation of premium video cards comes to market.

MORE: Best Gaming Monitors

MORE: How We Test PC Monitors

MORE: How to Buy a PC Monitor

To compare the G80HS’s performance, I’ve mined the highest resolution gaming monitors in my database. They are AOC’s U27G4XM and U32G4, ViewSonic’s VX2730D-4K, KTC’s H27P3, and Asus’ XG27JCG. None are 6K, but the KTC and Asus are 5K (5120x2880) and the rest are 4K (3840x2160).

Pixel Response and Input Lag

Click here to read up on our pixel response and input lag testing procedures.

The Asus was tested before my acquisition of the Nvidia LDAT, so it has been omitted from the response chart. The remaining screens are very close in speed except for the 60 Hz KTC, which is slower for obvious reasons. The G80HS is slightly behind the top three but not enough to make a visible difference. The only consideration is that you’ll need to choose either overdrive or Adaptive-Sync; you can’t have both at once. Overdrive has a tad less motion blur, but there are some frame tears.

In the lag test, the G80HS takes the crown by a significant margin at 165 Hz. Surprisingly, 330 Hz is actually slower. I can only conclude that there is some processing overhead from scaling down to a non-native resolution. Again though, this is an invisible difference. The benefit from 330 Hz is that you get almost no motion blur and you can use Adaptive-Sync because overdrive is unnecessary.

Test Takeaway: The G80HS is a very quick monitor at either 165 or 330 Hz. Running at 6K comes with some motion blur since you can’t use overdrive when Adaptive-Sync is turned on. It also takes more horsepower than a GeForce RTX 4090 provides to even approach 165 fps in a game. 330 Hz comes with decent pixel density and much smoother motion resolution because you don’t need the overdrive, which leaves Adaptive-Sync available. Either way, input lag is lower than other 4K and 5K monitors running at 120 to 160 Hz.

Viewing Angles

The G80HS shows its IPS roots with a slight green tint in the 45-degree horizontal view. This is offset by excellent gamma and brightness retention, as in there is no change in luminance. It’s one of the best IPS panels I’ve seen for off-axis image quality. The top view retains most of its brightness, but gamma is reduced, and there’s a green tint.

Screen Uniformity

To learn how we measure screen uniformity, click here.

My G80HS sample showed minor hotspots in the corners of the screen, which took its average deviation above the 10% threshold. This was difficult to spot in most content, but I could see a little glow in the darkest material. This is a sample-specific issue.

MORE: Best Gaming Monitors

MORE: How We Test PC Monitors

MORE: How to Buy a PC Monitor

To read about our monitor tests in-depth, please check out Display Testing Explained: How We Test PC Monitors. We cover brightness and contrast testing on page two.

Uncalibrated – Maximum Backlight Level

Many of the G80HS’s closest competitors have Mini LED backlights and are capable of high peak brightness. But 431 nits is nothing to complain about for SDR content. This was measured from a full field pattern with all dynamic contrast options turned off. Trying different combinations of the three settings, I found that turning Dynamic Brightness on produced the highest peak from a 25% window pattern, 470 nits with a contrast ratio around 14,500:1. But the native ratio of 1,662.8:1 is well above the IPS average. This is excellent performance.

After Calibration to 200 nits

The G80HS has a very low black level after calibration, and I saw a small increase in contrast to 1,706.1:1. The IPS average is 1,000:1, so all the screens except the U27G4XM are overachievers.

The ANSI result is reasonably consistent at 1,308:1. This is partially affected by the corner glow I noted earlier, so other G80HS samples might have a higher intra-image result. This is still excellent performance that is above the IPS average.

Test Takeaway: The G80HS has more contrast than most IPS monitors with around 1,700:1 after calibration. Dynamic Black can take that to over 14,000:1 with peaks of 470 nits if you’re looking for extra punch for games and video. My sample showed slight uniformity errors, so its ANSI score was a bit lower but still above the IPS average.

MORE: Best Gaming Monitors

MORE: How We Test PC Monitors

MORE: How to Buy a PC Monitor

The G80HS ships in its Graphic mode, which is backed by a factory calibration report. It doesn’t need to be calibrated, though some slight gains will come from a few tweaks.

Grayscale and Gamma Tracking

Our grayscale and gamma tests use Calman calibration software from Portrait Displays. We describe our grayscale and gamma tests in detail here.

Only the 90 and 100% brightness steps crack the 3dE threshold. That’s the point where errors become visible, though there are very few users who would spot a problem in either test patterns or actual content. Gamma is almost perfectly aligned with the 2.2 reference. This is excellent out-of-box performance.

Calibration of the very precise RGB sliders brings all grayscale errors to below 2dE, which is as good as it gets, even in the pro-monitor category. Gamma remains almost perfect at 2.23. It doesn’t get much better than this.

For the sRGB test, I had already calibrated the G80HS, so it measured just as excellently. This is one of the rare displays that lets you calibrate outside its native gamut mode. Just set Color Space to Auto and it will use sRGB for SDR and native (DCI-P3) for HDR. This is something that all wide gamut monitors should do, but most will gray out the RGB sliders in sRGB mode.

Comparisons

With a score of 1.98dE out of the box, the G80HS does not need to be calibrated. It’s ahead of many other gaming monitors in this test. With a few tweaks of the precise RGB sliders, the error drops to 0.99dE, pro monitor territory. That’s impressive, as is the score of the four other monitors, which are even lower. This is more for ego than anything else. Visually, you won’t be able to tell a difference between any of the six screens once they’ve been calibrated.

The G80HS is a poster child for gamma accuracy. Grayscale can be fixed, but nearly all computer monitors only allow wholesale changes to gamma; there’s rarely a way to fix errors at specific luminance points. When you have only a 0.10 range of values, and the average is 2.23 (1.36% deviation), you’ll see clear detail and texture in all parts of the image. And it improves gamut accuracy too because hue and saturation points are closer to their targets.

Color Gamut Accuracy

Our color gamut and volume testing use Portrait Displays’ Calman software. For details on our color gamut testing and volume calculations, click here.

The G80HS achieves decent gamut accuracy out of the box in Graphic mode. You can see slight undersaturation in red and green, which lets you know that Quantum Dots are not present. But there’s a little bonus blue which makes the sky a little more brilliant. Only slight hue errors in magenta mar an otherwise solid chart.

Calibration not only aligns the magenta hue, but it also improves red saturation. Though the change to grayscale is invisible in neutral patterns, it has a visible effect on color, so it’s worth making the adjustments.

On the sRGB chart, you can see a bit of over-saturation in red, magenta, and blue, but not enough to take the G80HS out of contention as a color-critical-qualified display. With a low 1.15dE error, it can work in a video post-production or photography editing suite.

Comparisons

All the screens score well in the color test, with the G80HS coming in fifth place at 1.91dE. This is well below the visible threshold, so in a side-by-side comparison, all the monitors will look similar. The difference is more one of color volume rather than accuracy. The top three screens have visibly more color, which is most visible in the brightest red and green hues. If you view a lot of HDR content, you can’t have too much color volume. But the G80HS does well without the added expense of Quantum Dots at 90.32% coverage of DCI-P3. And its 102% score for sRGB is near-ideal.

Test Takeaway: The G80HS is accurate enough to be used without calibration, but there are some gains to be had from a grayscale adjustment. Gamma is nearly perfect in either case. There are more colorful screens in the category, but among non-QD displays, the G80HS is very competitive.

MORE: Best Gaming Monitors

MORE: How We Test PC Monitors

MORE: How to Buy a PC Monitor

Our HDR benchmarking uses Portrait Displays’ Calman software. To learn about our HDR testing, see our breakdown of how we test PC monitors.

The G80HS supports HDR10 signals with an automatic switch. Unusually, in a good way, it leaves the RGB sliders accessible so you can create an independent calibration if you wish

HDR Brightness and Contrast

Without the advantage of a full-array Mini LED backlight, the G80HS isn’t as bright as some others, but it is brighter than average. Most edge-lit screens manage around 400 nits for HDR content. The G80HS gives you a couple of options for dynamic range. Natively, it will render around 1,700:1, but with Dynamic Brightness on High, it tickles the underside of 15,000:1, a nearly tenfold increase. I measured this with a 25% window pattern in, oddly enough, the HDR Eco mode. Trying the other modes brought no increase in output. In the comparison chart, the Asus shuts the backlight off in its brightest HDR mode when a 0% signal is input, so I couldn’t measure its contrast. The G80HS is one of the better edge-lit LCDs I’ve tested for HDR contrast.

Grayscale, EOTF and Color

The G80HS’s HDR color accuracy is even more impressive. Though I give a free pass to nearly every HDR monitor with over-saturated color, because they look good anyway, I must commend Samsung on its ultra-precise HDR. The grayscale chart is excellent with no visible errors. I did make a couple of tweaks to the RGB sliders, but the default test also had no visible errors. The EOTF is also spot-on with only tiny variations from the reference line.

In the color test, every point on the DCI-P3 chart is on target except for the 100% saturations of green, blue, and cyan, which are off by around 5%. This isn’t surprising given the lack of Quantum Dots. On the BT.2020 chart, the G80HS runs out of color at 85% red, 70% green, and 95% blue. While one might think this approach would be less colorful, it is more balanced and detailed than a monitor that simply pushes everything 5-10% higher. This is excellent performance.

Test Takeaway: The G80HS has some of the best and most accurate HDR color I’ve ever experienced, both in tests and in actual content. The balance is such that pushing saturation points as other monitors do becomes unnecessary. It isn’t as bright as a full-array Mini LED screen, but it is a bit brighter than most edge-lit displays. The Dynamic Brightness option delivers a nice contrast bump from 1,700:1 to almost 15,000:1 without any loss of detail.

MORE: Best Gaming Monitors

MORE: How We Test PC Monitors

MORE: How to Buy a PC Monitor

The quest for higher resolution and pixel density is unlikely to end any time soon. We might have been satisfied with Full HD for a time, but the lure of 4K, 5K, 6K and 8K is strong. 8K is still an exotic technology that will someday be more common on the desktop, but not today. For now, we have the in-between.

Since PCs and Macs can render any resolution the user wishes, monitors like Samsung’s Odyssey G80HS will be relevant. Greater pixel density is always a good thing, and this screen boasts 224ppi at 6K and 112ppi at 3K. And that dual refresh feature is super important because this monitor’s capabilities go beyond those of the current crop of top-shelf video cards. Though I found too much motion blur at 6K and 100fps, the experience in 3K and 300fps was excellent.

I was a bit dismayed that Adaptive-Sync and overdrive couldn’t be used together. But playing in 3K mode negated any need for either feature. The G80HS has impressively low input lag, so its gaming prowess is equal to the best competition monitors I’ve reviewed. I was also impressed by its accurate color, both out of the box and after calibration. The ability to switch color spaces automatically between SDR and HDR was a major plus. And though it uses an IPS panel rather than an OLED, it boasts impressive contrast of 1,700:1 native and almost 15,000:1 with an effective set of dynamic options.

Since 8K is still something of a unicorn, I can easily recommend a 6K monitor like the G80HS. It delivers superb imagery, speedy game performance, flexibility, and Samsung’s usual solid build quality. If you want to venture into the realm of extreme pixel density, definitely check it out.

MORE: Best Gaming Monitors

MORE: How We Test PC Monitors

MORE: How to Buy a PC Monitor

The strategy of using last-gen laptop parts in mini PCs used to mean excellent performance at competitive prices. At least, it did until the RAMpocalypse swept across tech. Nevertheless, Geekom is pushing the idea that its IT13 Max, using a Core Ultra 9 185H at $799, offers a value option in mid-2026. Looking at some of the other prices for mini PCs we’ve seen recently, it might be right.

Other than the reasonable Ultra 9 tier price for the performance, RAM and storage in the current market, Geekom delivers a very competent mini PC here. It looks like an unassuming, business-like machine from the outside, but has plenty of ports, easy internal access, and is very sturdy.

Design of the Geekom IT13 Max 2026

Geekom’s new IT13 Max 2026 follows a very traditional NUC design. With its just-under-a-liter volume, this black device is just slightly bigger in every dimension than the MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG (0.8 L), and shares a lot of the matte dark understated design and subtle branding of that unit. Later on, you’ll notice this pair has a lot in common when it comes to performance, too, despite being two Intel generations apart and featuring a huge price gap.

Geekom uses a matte plastic outer shell here, but the perforated venting areas to the sides and removable bottom plate are metal, as is an inner chassis. It is pretty easy to get into the IT13 Max, as there are just four screws positioned in the center of the rubber feet.

Users have access to power and headphones on the front panel, and a wide range of fast USB, networking, and monitor connection options. Geekom hasn’t implemented any biometrics in the power button, for example, and also eschews the addition of a Copilot button.

Geekom IT13 Max 2026 Specifications

Ports and Upgradeability on the Geekom IT13 Max 2026

When I decided to look inside, two of the four rubber feet could be unscrewed by hand, but another pair were just a little too tight, so I had to reach for my Phillips-head screwdriver. Once you get into this Geekom mini PC, there’s not much you can do, as the RAM is soldered.

The only upgrades users have access to are swapping the installed M.2 devices. There’s an M.2 2280 SSD slot with the NVMe PCIe4 500GB Kingston drive and thermal pad in place. Under that is the system’s M.2 2230 wireless connectivity card. To the side of these, I saw a vacant M.2 2242 slot. Oddly, the spec sheet I got from Geekom mentioned 2.5-inch SATA SSD/HDD expansion options, and not M.2 2242. There seemed to be an unused SATA header area on the motherboard, so perhaps specs were changed at a late stage of development.

The system offers a good array of ports built-in, and I didn’t want or need to reach for a docking solution during testing.

On the front of this mini PC, there is a generous row of four USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A ports. One of these supports always-on smart device charging. Next to these ports is a 3.5 mm audio jack and an inset power button with a white LED to indicate it is powered up.

On the left side, there is a full-size SD card reader, and on the right, you will find a Kensington lock slot.

At the rear of the IT13 Max 2026, there’s a series of vents, and below them, most of the I/O. This includes a USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A port, a USB 2.0 Type-A, two USB4 Type-C (both with DP-Alt, one offers Power in), two RJ-45 2.5 Gbps Ethernet ports, a pair of HDMI 2.0 ports, and a DC‑in barrel jack for the supplied power brick.

Test System Setup

Productivity Performance on the Geekom IT13 Max 2026

Geekom boasts of all-round flagship performance from this new mini PC and thankfully skips any outlandish AI-related claims. Now we are getting down to testing, we shall see if there are any glaring weaknesses that come from choosing Intel’s previous-previous-gen silicon.

Geekom has opted for older silicon in the IT13 Max 2026, utilizing Intel’s Core Ultra 9 185H (16C/22T), which boosts up to 5.1 GHz, and shares die space with an Arc iGPU featuring eight Xe cores. This is quite a lot of compute and GPU resources in a little SoC, and that’s why the Ultra 9 185H was one of the top mobile processors a couple of years ago. There’s an NPU on board, too, but it can only muster 11 TOPS according to Intel’s data sheets. The question is if that chip, alongside 24GB of RAM and a 500GB, still stands up.

In the comparison charts above, you can see how the IT13 Max squared up to more modern rivals. In Cinebench 2026, Maxon’s current-gen CPU rendering benchmark, the single-thread result of ~450 points does mean that the Meteor Lake machine does trail the pack, but it isn’t a disaster. Turning to the multicore result in the same test, the latest Geekom mini PC with its older “Meteor Lake” chip basically matches the MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG based on Intel “Panther Lake” silicon. Admittedly, the former’s 16C/22T core/thread count and higher power limits lift it against the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H with 16C/16T in the MSI.

In HandBrake, the Geekom managed 13 frames per second on our standard video transcoding test. That’s neck and neck with the MSI, again, but only with very long videos would you likely notice how it lags behind.

Gaming and Graphics on the Geekom IT13 Max 2026

The Geekom IT13 Max isn't hopeless in gaming, but it sits in the lower portion of our mini PC game benchmark comparison tables. It mostly performs better than the MSI Panther Lake mini PC, again. Not bad for something from two generations prior.

For my traditional spell of gaming fun before serious benchmarking, I decided to go on a quick adventure in Borderlands GOTY Enhanced (2019). The game ran at an average of about 80 frames per second when using the High preset at 1080p. I didn’t have any problem with frame rates mostly in the 80s, periodic dips in the frame chart looked worse than they actually felt during the game. It is definitely an older game now, and while the iGPU ran at close to its max utilization on my uncapped frame rate run, the CPU was barely burdened.

I also ran a few synthetic gaming benchmarks, a trio of 3DMark tests. One of those was the cross-platform 3DMark Solar Bay, which is well-weighted for iGPU performance comparisons, delivering playable frame rates on this type of graphics hardware.

The Geekom IT13 Max 2026 earned a score of 13,430 in this test. The Meteor Lake mini PC’s score (with eight Xe-LPG) cores is about 18% faster than the newer Panther Lake rival (with four Xe3-LPG cores). Both of them, and the AMD Ryzen AI mini PCs we have tested crumble in comparison with the GMKtec Evo-T2 with the best Panther Lake iGPU, the 12 Xe3-LPG core B390.

Moving onto some popular AAA gaming titles, I next checked how Shadow of the Tomb Raider performed on the Geekom. Its average of 37 and minimum of 29 frames per second put it once more very squarely in the same territory as the MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG mini PC.

Cyberpunk 2077 was technically playable using the Steam Deck 1080p preset that we have been using for mini PC comparisons. Its average and 1% low results were 36 and 30 frames per second, respectively. Very slightly behind the Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG this time by both those metrics. Running Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p using the high preset (no upscaling tech) is not recommended, as the IT13 Max achieved an average of 21 frames per second.

The overall picture that emerged was that the Geekom IT13 Max 2026 isn’t bad at modern gaming with low-ish settings, with upscaling if available, but is more suited to lighter and older titles.

Power, Heat, and Noise when using the Geekom IT13 Max 2026

I tested the IT13 Max 2026 with the default power profile Geekom shipped it with, which is a Processor Base Power (PBP, PL1) of 45W, a Maximum Turbo Power (MTP, PL2) of 70W, and a PL4 of 120W, according to system information tools. During testing, I measured total system power consumption with a plug-in power meter, as well as reading the CPU temperatures using a Windows utility.

At low load, with Google Docs open for typing among a few other browser tabs, the system consistently pulled around 14W. At the same time, the CPU temperature would stick around 43 degrees Celsius.

During prolonged stress testing of the IT13 Max 2026, the highest wattage consumed by the whole system momentarily spiked to around 85W, but a stable sustained level of ~70W was generally observed. It also seemed to stabilize at approximately the 70 degrees Celsius level after initially climbing higher.

The Geekom is a quiet mini PC, but you can hear the small cooling fan blowing clearly if it is put through any demanding CPU or GPU task. My meter showed 29.8 dB when idling, which is good, but the noise level ramped to a more than noticeable 52.3 dB when the system was under a sustained load.

Software and Warranty on the Geekom IT13 Max 2026

This mini PC came with Windows 11 Pro preinstalled and activated. As usual, before testing, we ensured Windows and drivers were fully up to date.

There were no utilities added by Geekom. Checking the Installed Apps list on Windows revealed both Realtek Audio Console and Realtek Card Reader as the only non-standard components in a typical Windows install.

Linux is also fully supported, according to the official spec sheets.

Geekom sells the IT13 Max 2026 with a three-year warranty, though the company does require you to pay a return shipping fee.

Geekom IT13 Max 2026 configurations

Geekom sells just one configuration of the IT13 Max 2026 — the one we have tested with 24GB of soldered LPDDR5 RAM and a 500GB SSD preinstalled.

Those browsing and interested in this particular configuration should be careful, though. Geekom is still selling an older variant of the IT13 Max with very similar specs but with two SODIMM slots, making it expandable to 96GB of DDR5-5600 memory. This other Core Ultra 9 185H device comes with a single 16GB SODIMM and a 1TB SSD preinstalled. It is usually $899, but Geekom is currently selling this version for the same $799 if you prefer its RAM/SSD configuration.

Bottom Line

During my testing of the Geekom IT13 Max 2026, I found it to be a dependable device. In the current climate, the soldered dual-channel 24GB of RAM might be a sweet spot if you want your integrated GPU to access a decent chunk of the memory pool. It is interesting to see the prior IT Max model now moved down to the same $799 price if you don’t want to accept soldered RAM, would like more preinstalled storage, and are otherwise attracted to owning a tiny PC powered by Intel’s Core Ultra 9 185H with its 16C/22T and reasonable Arc iGPU.

It is very interesting to see this mini PC match the far more modern MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG we tested recently (which costs far more, as is often the case for enterprise pricing) in many of the benchmark applications and games. The MSI uses a Core Ultra 9 386H, so this is a reasonably fair U9 vs U9 comparison. In practice, the Geekom even seemed to idle at a slightly lower wattage than the MSI, but admittedly, it would pull around 70W under load, which is 15W more than the MSI Panther Lake was observed consuming. This points to one of the biggest attractions of most mainstream Panther Lake CPUs being their efficiency, which is far more important in a laptop than a mini PC like this.

To conclude, this does indeed seem like a capable, moderately quiet under light day-to-day loads, and power-efficient offering for the ticket price in mid-2026. At $799 the prior model might offer some of the best competition if removable RAM, albeit just 16GB, and a 1TB preinstalled SSD can sway you.