<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="https://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:cf="https://www.futureplc.com/rss/content-flags"
>
    <channel>
                    <atom:link rel="alternate" hreflang="en-GB"
                       href="https://www.tomshardware.com/uk/feeds/tag/amd-ryzen-5-2600"
                       type="application/rss+xml"/>
                            <title><![CDATA[ Latest from Tom's Hardware UK in Amd-ryzen-5-2600 ]]></title>
                <link>https://www.tomshardware.com/uk/tag/amd-ryzen-5-2600</link>
        <description><![CDATA[ All the latest amd-ryzen-5-2600 content from the Tom's Hardware  UK team ]]></description>
                                    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:25:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
                            <language>en</language>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ CPU Benchmarks and Hierarchy 2026: CPU Rankings ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ All of today's desktop CPU benchmarks compared, including Intel's 13th-Gen Core series and AMD's Ryzen Zen 4 and Threadripper. ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">V7teKs7ev9p3jsgMmVR9A</guid>
                                                                                                <enclosure url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/7FRLCpVusR9om4FiGDuPyG-1280-80.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="0"></enclosure>
                                                                        <pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:25:13 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                <updated>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 14:25:49 +0000</updated>
                                                                                                                                            <category><![CDATA[CPUs]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[PC Components]]></category>
                                                                                                                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Jake Roach ]]></dc:creator>                                                                                    <dc:source><![CDATA[ https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/h6PRM8bTimCTnNfoAYfjAi.jpg ]]></dc:source>
                                                                <dc:description><![CDATA[ &lt;p&gt;Jake Roach has been bending pins and busting solder joints since the mid-2000s. From trying to run scratched CDs of &lt;em&gt;Delta Force &lt;/em&gt;and &lt;em&gt;Unreal Tournament &lt;/em&gt;to spitting out virtual machines on a Threadripper, Jake has been on the hunt for the latest hardware and highest performance for decades. That eventually spun up a career, with Jake serving as Lead Reporter at Digital Trends, as well as contributing to outlets like XDA, PC Invasion, Business Insider, and WIRED. At Tom’s Hardware, Jake is focused on consumer and workstation CPUs. Outside working hours, you’ll find him knee-deep in the latest roguelite taking over Steam, spending way too much money on &lt;em&gt;Magic: The Gathering, &lt;/em&gt;or forcing his lazy corgi onto walks.&lt;/p&gt; ]]></dc:description>
                                                                                                        <dc:contributor><![CDATA[ Paul Alcorn ]]></dc:contributor>
                                                                    <cf:isSponsored>false</cf:isSponsored>
                <cf:hasAffiliateLinks>false</cf:hasAffiliateLinks>
                <cf:isPaid>false</cf:isPaid>
                                                                                                                                <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/7FRLCpVusR9om4FiGDuPyG-1280-80.jpg">
                                                            <media:credit><![CDATA[Tom&#039;s Hardware]]></media:credit>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    <media:description><![CDATA[CPUs laying out.]]></media:description>                                                            <media:text><![CDATA[CPUs laying out.]]></media:text>
                                <media:title type="plain"><![CDATA[CPUs laying out.]]></media:title>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                    <media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/7FRLCpVusR9om4FiGDuPyG-1280-80.jpg" />
                                                                                                                                                                    <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <div  class="fancy-box"><div class="fancy_box-title">More CPU content:</div><div class="fancy_box_body"><p class="fancy-box__body-text"><ul><li><a data-analytics-id="inline-link" href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html" target="_blank">The Best CPU for Gaming</a></li><li><a data-analytics-id="inline-link" href="https://www.tomshardware.com/features/amd-vs-intel-cpus" target="_blank">Intel vs AMD</a></li><li><a data-analytics-id="inline-link" href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-buying-guide,5643.html" target="_blank">CPU Buying Guide</a></li><li><a data-analytics-id="inline-link" href="https://www.tomshardware.com/features/best-cpu-deals" target="_blank">Best CPU Deals</a></li><li><a data-analytics-id="inline-link" href="https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/intel-core-ultra-9-285k-vs-amd-ryzen-7-9800x3d-faceoff-battle-of-the-gaming-flagships" target="_blank">AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Faceoff</a></li><li><a data-analytics-id="inline-link" href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-gpus,4380.html" target="_blank">The Best GPU for Gaming</a></li><li><a data-analytics-id="inline-link" href="https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus" target="_blank">All CPU Content</a></li></ul></p></div></div><p>Our CPU benchmark hierarchy provides a broad view of relative performance for the latest Intel and AMD processors. Over the last 30 years, Tom’s Hardware has been benchmarking CPUs, and we use the rankings here as the basis of our <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html"><u>best CPUs for gaming</u></a> and <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cheap-cpus,5668.html"><u>best budget CPU</u></a> rankings. We run over 200 individual tests for each CPU we look at, and that comprehensive performance is condensed here for a high-level view of how CPUs compare across gaming, single-threaded, and multithreaded performance. </p><p>Each of our CPU benchmarks helps expose different aspects of performance, from heavily-threaded code compilation and data science workloads to lightly-threaded web apps and audio encoding. We’re currently in the process of the biggest refresh to our CPU benchmarks hierarchy ever, spanning over a decade of processor releases. The results here provide the first half of that testing, focusing on DDR5 platforms that span the <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/features/amd-vs-intel-cpus"><u>AMD vs Intel</u></a> product lineups. As we fill out our legacy benchmarks, you’ll see more CPUs added to our rankings. If you want to check the performance of older CPUs now, you can use the second page of this article to see our legacy benchmarks. </p><p>In games, <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/amd-ryzen-7-9850x3d-review"><u>AMD’s Ryzen 7 9850X3D</u></a> is the fastest CPU on the market, though other Zen 5 X3D offerings like the <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/amd-ryzen-9-9950x3d-review"><u>Ryzen 9 9950X3D</u></a> and <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/amd-ryzen-7-9800x3d-review-devastating-gaming-performance"><u>Ryzen 7 9800X3D </u></a>aren’t far behind. X3D chips dominate the charts for gaming at 1080p, with the other exception being the relatively unpopular (and expensive) Ryzen 9 7900X3D. Otherwise, Intel’s last-gen Core i9-14900K is the fastest offering from Team Blue, with the new Core Ultra 7 270K Plus coming in slightly behind <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/intels-binary-optimization-tool-tested-and-explained-how-the-ibot-translation-delivers-up-to-18-percent-faster-gaming-performance-8-percent-on-average"><u>with Intel’s new iBOT feature</u></a>. </p><p>Intel pulls out strong positions in applications; however, with the <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/intel-core-ultra-7-270k-plus-review/"><u>Core Ultra 7 270K Plus </u></a>topping the charts in single-threaded performance and coming in third in multi-threaded rankings. It’s only beaten by the Ryzen 9 9950X and its X3D variant, and only by a hair. Further, both of those CPUs cost about twice as much. AMD's recent <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/amd-ryzen-9-9950x3d2-review">Ryzen 9 9950X3D2</a> claims the top slot in overall performance, but at $900, it's too expensive for most buyers. </p><p>In each section below, we’ll show you the rankings for each CPU, as well as reveal what tests went into creating the rankings. We’ll also give you some pointers for benchmarking your own CPU to see how much performance an upgrade or overclock netted you, along with some common, easy-to-run benchmarks you can perform yourself. </p><h3 class="article-body__section" id="section-cpu-benchmarks-rankings-2026"><span>CPU Benchmarks Rankings 2026</span></h3><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/DDw3RLrourqMvUZa2Ugp9f.png" alt="CPU Benchmark Rankings" /><figcaption><small role="credit">Tom's Hardware</small></figcaption></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/jBp8pv3MTsgV9U2yXWjp9f.png" alt="CPU Benchmark Rankings" /><figcaption><small role="credit">Tom's Hardware</small></figcaption></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/inLKtbMy7MiHA6ZRPj8nAf.png" alt="CPU Benchmark Rankings" /><figcaption><small role="credit">Tom's Hardware</small></figcaption></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/SmDdzbKGWsiS2fFtifxNCf.png" alt="CPU Benchmark Rankings" /><figcaption><small role="credit">Tom's Hardware</small></figcaption></figure></figure><p>In the album above, you can see our master charts for gaming, single-threaded, and multi-threaded performance for CPUs. For games, all of our testing was done with an Nvidia RTX 5090 FE, and for applications, our testing was done with an Nvidia RTX 2080 Ti FE. For applications, no compute is actively running on the GPU; it’s a glorified display output that shares a driver with our gaming GPU. You can find a full breakdown of the test benches we used at the end of this article. </p><h3 class="article-body__section" id="section-gaming-cpu-benchmarks-rankings-2026"><span>Gaming CPU Benchmarks Rankings 2026</span></h3><div ><table><caption> Gaming CPU Benchmarks Rankings 2026</caption><tbody><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p><strong>CPU / (MSRP)</strong></p></td><td  ><p><strong>Street Price</strong></p></td><td  ><p><strong>1080p Gaming Score</strong></p></td><td  ><p><strong>Architecture</strong></p></td><td  ><p><strong>Cores/Threads (P+E)</strong></p></td><td  ><p><strong>Base/Boost Clock (GHz)</strong></p></td><td  ><p><strong>TDP / Maximum Power</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 7 9850X3D ($500)</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-RyzenTM-9850X3D-Desktop-Processor/dp/B0G8JMLXNQ/"><u>$499</u></a></p></td><td  ><p>100%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 5 X3D</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>4.7 / 5.6</p></td><td  ><p>120W / 162W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 7 9800X3D ($480)</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-9800X3D-16-Thread-Desktop-Processor/dp/B0DKFMSMYK/"><u>$464</u></a></p></td><td  ><p>97%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 5 X3D</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>4.7 / 5.2 </p></td><td  ><p>120W / 162W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 9 9950X3D ($700)</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-9950X3D-16-Core-Processor/dp/B0DVZSG8D5/"><u>$676</u></a></p></td><td  ><p>95.7%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 5 X3D</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 32</p></td><td  ><p>4.3 / 5.7</p></td><td  ><p>170W / 230W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 9 9900X3D ($600)</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-9900X3D-12-Core-Processor/dp/B0DWGWN8GY/"><u>$530</u></a></p></td><td  ><p>86.9%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 5 X3D</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 24</p></td><td  ><p>4.4 / 5.5</p></td><td  ><p>120W / 230W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 7 7800X3D ($450)</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-7800X3D-16-Thread-Processor/dp/B0BTZB7F88/"><u>$399</u></a></p></td><td  ><p>85.6%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 4 X3D</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>4.2 / 5</p></td><td  ><p>120W / 162W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 9 7950X3D ($700)</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-7950X3D-Hexadeca-core-Processor/dp/B0BTRH9MNS/"><u>$650</u></a></p></td><td  ><p>83.9%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 4 X3D</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 32</p></td><td  ><p>4.2 / 5.7</p></td><td  ><p>120W / 162W </p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 5 7600X3D ($300)</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-7600X3D-Raphael-4-1GHz-Processor/dp/B0F9XH8DBP/"><u>$246</u></a></p></td><td  ><p>80.6%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 4 X3D</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>4.1 / 4.7</p></td><td  ><p>65W / 88W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i9-14900K ($550)</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/i9-14900K-Desktop-Processor-Integrated-Graphics/dp/B0CGJDKLB8/"><u>$469</u></a></p></td><td  ><p>78.2%</p></td><td  ><p>Raptor Lake Refresh</p></td><td  ><p>24 / 32 (8+16)</p></td><td  ><p>3.2 / 6</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 253W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core Ultra 7 270K Plus ($300)</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/intel-core-ultra-7-270k-plus-core-ultra-7-series-2-arrow-lake-refresh-lga-1851-desktop-cpu-processor/p/N82E16819118628"><u>$350</u></a></p></td><td  ><p>77.5%</p></td><td  ><p>Arrow Lake Refresh</p></td><td  ><p>24 / 24 (8+16)</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 5.5</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 250W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 7 7900X3D ($600)</p></td><td  ><p>Out of Stock</p></td><td  ><p>77.1%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 4 X3D</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 24</p></td><td  ><p>4.4 / 5.6</p></td><td  ><p>120W / 162W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 9 9950X ($650)</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-RyzenTM-9950X-32-Thread-Processor/dp/B0D6NNRBGP/"><u>$520</u></a></p></td><td  ><p>76.9%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 5</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 32</p></td><td  ><p>4.7 / 5/7</p></td><td  ><p>170W / 230W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i9-13900K ($590)</p></td><td  ><p>Out of Stock</p></td><td  ><p>76.8%</p></td><td  ><p>Raptor Lake</p></td><td  ><p>24 / 32 (8+16)</p></td><td  ><p>3 / 5.8</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 253W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i7-14700K ($410)</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/i7-14700K-Desktop-Processor-Integrated-Graphics/dp/B0CGJ41C9W/"><u>$340</u></a></p></td><td  ><p>76.4%</p></td><td  ><p>Raptor Lake Refresh</p></td><td  ><p>20 / 28 (8+12)</p></td><td  ><p>3.4 / 5.6</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 253W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i7-13700K ($410)</p></td><td  ><p>Out of Stock</p></td><td  ><p>75.8%</p></td><td  ><p>Raptor Lake</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 24 (8+8)</p></td><td  ><p>3.4 / 5.4</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 253W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 9 9900X ($500)</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-RyzenTM-9900X-24-Thread-Processor/dp/B0D6NN87T8/"><u>$439</u></a></p></td><td  ><p>73.9%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 5</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 24</p></td><td  ><p>4.4 / 5.6</p></td><td  ><p>120W / 162W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core Ultra 5 250K Plus ($200)</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/intel-core-ultra-5-250k-plus-core-ultra-5-series-2-arrow-lake-refresh-lga-1851-desktop-cpu-processor/p/N82E16819118629"><u>$220</u></a></p></td><td  ><p>73.3%</p></td><td  ><p>Arrow Lake Refresh</p></td><td  ><p>18 / 18 (6+12)</p></td><td  ><p>4.2 / 5.3</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 159W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i5-14600K ($320)</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/i5-14600K-Desktop-Processor-Integrated-Graphics/dp/B0CGJ9STNF/"><u>$300</u></a></p></td><td  ><p>72.8%</p></td><td  ><p>Raptor Lake Refresh</p></td><td  ><p>14 / 20 (6+8)</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 5.3</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 181W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 5 9600X ($280)</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-RyzenTM-9600X-12-Thread-Processor/dp/B0D6NN6TM7/"><u>$188</u></a></p></td><td  ><p>72.6%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 5</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.9 / 5.4</p></td><td  ><p>65W / 88W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core Ultra 9 285K ($590)</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Intel-Core-Ultra-Processor-285K/dp/B0DFKC99VL/"><u>$557</u></a></p></td><td  ><p>71.8%</p></td><td  ><p>Arrow Lake</p></td><td  ><p>24 / 24 (8+16)</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 5.7</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 250W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 9 7950X ($700)</p></td><td  ><p>Out of Stock</p></td><td  ><p>71%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 4</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 32</p></td><td  ><p>4.5 / 5.7</p></td><td  ><p>170W / 230W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i5-13600K ($320)</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Intel-i5-13600K-Desktop-Processor-P-cores/dp/B0BCDR9M33/"><u>$319</u></a></p></td><td  ><p>70.9%</p></td><td  ><p>Raptor Lake</p></td><td  ><p>14 / 20 (6+8)</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 5.1</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 181W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 7 7700X ($400)</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-7700X-16-Thread-Unlocked-Processor/dp/B0BBHHT8LY/"><u>$249</u></a></p></td><td  ><p>70.6%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 4</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>4.5 / 5.4</p></td><td  ><p>105W / 142W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core Ultra 7 265K ($400)</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Intel-Core-Ultra-Processor-265K/dp/B0DFK2MH2D/"><u>$284</u></a></p></td><td  ><p>70.3%</p></td><td  ><p>Arrow Lake</p></td><td  ><p>20 / 20 (8+12)</p></td><td  ><p>3.9 / 5.5</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 250W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 9 7900X ($550)</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-7900X-24-Thread-Unlocked-Processor/dp/B0BBJ59WJ4/"><u>$299</u></a></p></td><td  ><p>69.2%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 4</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 24</p></td><td  ><p>4.7 / 5.6</p></td><td  ><p>170W / 230W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 5 7600X ($300)</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-7600X-12-Thread-Unlocked-Processor/dp/B0BBJDS62N/"><u>$180</u></a></p></td><td  ><p>67.3%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 4</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>4.7 / 5.3</p></td><td  ><p>105W / 142W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core Ultra 5 245K ($320)</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Intel-Core-Ultra-Processor-245K/dp/B0DFK2P311/"><u>$202</u></a></p></td><td  ><p>67.1%</p></td><td  ><p>Arrow Lake</p></td><td  ><p>14 / 14 (6+8)</p></td><td  ><p>4.2 / 5.2</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 159W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i7-12700K ($410)</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Intel-i7-12700K-Desktop-Processor-Unlocked/dp/B09FXNVDBJ/"><u>$285</u></a></p></td><td  ><p>65.8%</p></td><td  ><p>Alder Lake</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 20 (8+4)</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 5</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 190W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core Ultra 5 225 ($183)</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Intel%C2%AE-CoreTM-Desktop-Processor-P-cores/dp/B0DT7DXXJT/"><u>$180</u></a></p></td><td  ><p>62.5%</p></td><td  ><p>Arrow Lake</p></td><td  ><p>10 / 10 (6+4)</p></td><td  ><p>3.3 / 4.9</p></td><td  ><p>65W / 121W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i5-12600K ($290)</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Intel-i5-12600K-Desktop-Processor-Unlocked/dp/B09FX4D72T/"><u>$185</u></a></p></td><td  ><p>60.8%</p></td><td  ><p>Alder Lake</p></td><td  ><p>10 / 16 (6+4)</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 4.9</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 150W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i5-14400 ($220)</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Intel-i5-14400-Desktop-Processor-P-cores/dp/B0CQ1M1YXM/"><u>$250</u></a></p></td><td  ><p>58%</p></td><td  ><p>Raptor Lake</p></td><td  ><p>10 / 16 (6+4)</p></td><td  ><p>2.5 / 4.7</p></td><td  ><p>65W / 154W</p></td></tr></tbody></table></div><p>You can see the relative score for AMD and Intel CPUs above, measured against the Ryzen 7 9850X3D, which is the fastest gaming CPU on the market, per our testing. So, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D offers 97.04% of the performance of the Ryzen 7 9850X3D, while the Ryzen 9 7900X offers 69.28% of the performance. You can set any CPU as a baseline for comparison with Bench, which is available in <em>Tom’s Hardware Premium. </em></p><p>All of our gaming tests were run with the RTX 5090 FE at 1080p with a mixture of High and Ultra settings. We run each test multiple times — usually between three and five — and pick the median result. In other words, the results we use are real, recorded runs, not an average of several different runs. This is important as some games, such as <em>Far Cry 6, </em>show great CPU scaling but are otherwise inconsistent run-to-run. </p><p>In addition to consistent hardware (test benches at the end of this article), we use a consistent test image between platforms. That means the same GPU driver, the same Windows install, the game version, etc. We also tested with Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) turned off, Resizable BAR turned on, and automatic overclocking features disabled. That includes the Intel Extreme power profile and AMD’s PBO, both of which aren’t covered under standard warranty. </p><p>For this refresh, we tested 17 games and then calculated a geometric mean of the results. A simple average would provide skewed results with such a large test pool. A geomean provides a more realistic view of how each CPU compares to the others.</p><p>Here are the games that we used for testing: </p><ul><li><em>Counter-Strike 2</em></li><li><em>The Last of Us Part One</em></li><li><em>Cyberpunk 2077</em></li><li><em>Starfield</em></li><li><em>A Plague Tale: Requiem</em></li><li><em>Hogwarts Legacy</em></li><li><em>F1 24</em></li><li><em>Marvel’s Spider-Man 2</em></li><li><em>Baldur’s Gate 3</em></li><li><em>Monster Hunter: Wilds</em></li><li><em>Final Fantasy XIV</em></li><li><em>Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024</em></li><li><em>Doom: The Dark Ages</em></li><li><em>Oblivion Remastered</em></li><li><em>Far Cry 6</em></li><li><em>Hitman 3</em></li><li><em>Minecraft RTX</em></li></ul><p>We’re constantly evaluating new games to include in our test suite — see our recent stories on <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/testing-cpu-scaling-in-resident-evil-requiem-and-why-we-werent-able-to-finish-the-job"><u><em>Resident Evil Requiem </em></u><u>CPU scaling</u></a> and <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/testing-cpu-scaling-in-crimson-desert-x3d-wins-but-not-by-much-and-raptor-lake-shines"><u><em>Crimson Desert </em></u><u>CPU scaling</u></a> — but we maintain a list of tried-and-true benchmarks for our hierarchy rankings. We want to avoid including brand-new titles, which may see many updates, to keep our rankings as true to reality as possible. If you want more about the rationale behind our game choices, see our <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/behind-the-scenes-of-our-massive-cpu-retest-for-bench-testing-at-1080p-choosing-new-apps-and-gathering-data-for-a-decade-of-cpus"><u>behind the scenes look at our CPU hierarchy</u></a> testing. </p><h3 class="article-body__section" id="section-single-threaded-cpu-benchmarks-rankings-2026"><span>Single-Threaded CPU Benchmarks Rankings 2026</span></h3><div ><table><caption>2026 Single-Threaded CPU Benchmarks</caption><tbody><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p><strong>Single-Threaded App Score</strong></p></td><td  ><p><strong>Architecture</strong></p></td><td  ><p><strong>Cores/Threads (P+E)</strong></p></td><td  ><p><strong>Base/Boost Clock (GHz)</strong></p></td><td  ><p><strong>TDP / Maximum Power</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core Ultra 7 270K Plus</p></td><td  ><p>100%</p></td><td  ><p>Arrow Lake Refresh</p></td><td  ><p>24 / 24 (8+16)</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 5.5</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 250W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core Ultra 9 285K</p></td><td  ><p>98.5%</p></td><td  ><p>Arrow Lake</p></td><td  ><p>24 / 24 (8+16)</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 5.7</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 250W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core Ultra 7 265K</p></td><td  ><p>96.8%</p></td><td  ><p>Arrow Lake</p></td><td  ><p>20 / 20 (8+12)</p></td><td  ><p>3.9 / 5.5</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 250W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i9-14900K</p></td><td  ><p>95.4%</p></td><td  ><p>Raptor Lake Refresh</p></td><td  ><p>24 / 32 (8+16)</p></td><td  ><p>3.2 / 6</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 253W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core Ultra 5 250K Plus</p></td><td  ><p>94%</p></td><td  ><p>Arrow Lake Refresh</p></td><td  ><p>18 / 18 (6+12)</p></td><td  ><p>4.2 / 5.3</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 159W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 9 9950X</p></td><td  ><p>93.3%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 5</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 32</p></td><td  ><p>4.7 / 5/7</p></td><td  ><p>170W / 230W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 7 9850X3D</p></td><td  ><p>93.2%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 5 X3D</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>4.7 / 5.6</p></td><td  ><p>120W / 162W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 9 9950X3D</p></td><td  ><p>92.8%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 5 X3D</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 32</p></td><td  ><p>4.3 / 5.7</p></td><td  ><p>170W / 230W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core Ultra 5 245K</p></td><td  ><p>92.5%</p></td><td  ><p>Arrow Lake</p></td><td  ><p>14 / 14 (6+8)</p></td><td  ><p>4.2 / 5.2</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 159W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i9-13900K</p></td><td  ><p>92.4%</p></td><td  ><p>Raptor Lake</p></td><td  ><p>24 / 32 (8+16)</p></td><td  ><p>3 / 5.8</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 253W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 9 9900X</p></td><td  ><p>92.2%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 5</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 24</p></td><td  ><p>4.4 / 5.6</p></td><td  ><p>120W / 162W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 9 9900X3D</p></td><td  ><p>90.8%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 5 X3D</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 24</p></td><td  ><p>4.4 / 5.5</p></td><td  ><p>120W / 230W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 9 9700X / 105W TDP</p></td><td  ><p>90.6% / 90.5%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 5</p></td><td  ><p>8 /16</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 5.5</p></td><td  ><p>65W / 88W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i7-14700K</p></td><td  ><p>90.1%</p></td><td  ><p>Raptor Lake Refresh</p></td><td  ><p>20 / 28 (8+12)</p></td><td  ><p>3.4 / 5.6</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 253W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 5 9600X / 105W TDP</p></td><td  ><p>89% / 88.9%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 5</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.9 / 5.4</p></td><td  ><p>65W / 88W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 7 9800X3D</p></td><td  ><p>87.6%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 5 X3D</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>4.7 / 5.2 </p></td><td  ><p>120W / 162W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core Ultra 5 225</p></td><td  ><p>87.3%</p></td><td  ><p>Arrow Lake</p></td><td  ><p>10 / 10 (6+4)</p></td><td  ><p>3.3 / 4.9</p></td><td  ><p>65W / 121W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i7-13700K</p></td><td  ><p>86.7%</p></td><td  ><p>Raptor Lake</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 24 (8+8)</p></td><td  ><p>3.4 / 5.4</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 253W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i5-14600K</p></td><td  ><p>85.8%</p></td><td  ><p>Raptor Lake Refresh</p></td><td  ><p>14 / 20 (6+8)</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 5.3</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 181W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 9 7950X3D</p></td><td  ><p>85.4%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 4 X3D</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 32</p></td><td  ><p>4.2 / 5.7</p></td><td  ><p>120W / 162W </p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 9 7950X</p></td><td  ><p>85.2%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 4</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 32</p></td><td  ><p>4.5 / 5.7</p></td><td  ><p>170W / 230W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 9 7900X3D</p></td><td  ><p>84%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 4 X3D</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 24</p></td><td  ><p>4.4 / 5.6</p></td><td  ><p>120W / 162W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 7 7700X</p></td><td  ><p>84%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 4</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>4.5 / 5.4</p></td><td  ><p>105W / 142W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i5-13600K</p></td><td  ><p>82.4%</p></td><td  ><p>Raptor Lake</p></td><td  ><p>14 / 20 (6+8)</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 5.1</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 181W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i7-12700K</p></td><td  ><p>79.7%</p></td><td  ><p>Alder Lake</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 20 (8+4)</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 5</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 190W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i5-12600K</p></td><td  ><p>78.6%</p></td><td  ><p>Alder Lake</p></td><td  ><p>10 / 16 (6+4)</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 4.9</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 150W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 7 7800X3D</p></td><td  ><p>77.3%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 4 X3D</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>4.2 / 5</p></td><td  ><p>120W / 162W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i5-14400</p></td><td  ><p>75.4%</p></td><td  ><p>Raptor Lake</p></td><td  ><p>10 / 16 (6+4)</p></td><td  ><p>2.5 / 4.7</p></td><td  ><p>65W / 154W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 5 7600X3D</p></td><td  ><p>73.2%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 4 X3D</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>4.1 / 4.7</p></td><td  ><p>65W / 88W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 5 7600X</p></td><td  ><p>71.5%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 4</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>4.7 / 5.3</p></td><td  ><p>105W / 142W</p></td></tr></tbody></table></div><p>We run hundreds of tests for each CPU, but only a small subset of those tests factor into our single-threaded rankings. We use the mp3 encoder LAME with a single thread (both standard and extended), Cinebench 2026 and 2024’s single-threaded test, the ray-traced renderer POV-ray, and WebXRT4, which runs a series of browser-based applications written in various languages. </p><p>The fastest chip in the pool here is the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus, which scores 100%, with every other chip scored relative to it. The Core i9-14900K offers 95.4% of the single-threaded performance of the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus, the Ryzen 5 9600X offers 89% of the performance, and so on. </p><p>Most real-world workloads aren’t strictly single-threaded, which is why we include it on a subset of the total tests we run. The goal is to see what relative performance looks like in lightly-threaded applications, as well as look into the overall architecture of different CPUs. Single-threaded performance exposes a lot about the architecture in a way that heavily-threaded applications tend to mask. </p><p>We’re, of course, looking at performance on a single core, favoring high clock speeds and IPC (instructions per cycle). However, single-threaded performance also says a lot about what’s going on elsewhere inside the CPU, from the speed of the IMC (integrated memory controller) to the fabric/ring speed. That’s why we see things like the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus outperforming the Core Ultra 9 285K, despite the latter sporting higher clock speeds. </p><h3 class="article-body__section" id="section-multi-threaded-cpu-benchmarks-rankings-2026"><span>Multi-Threaded CPU Benchmarks Rankings 2026</span></h3><div ><table><caption>2026 Multi-Threaded CPU Benchmarks</caption><tbody><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p><strong>Single-Threaded App Score</strong></p></td><td  ><p><strong>Architecture</strong></p></td><td  ><p><strong>Cores/Threads (P+E)</strong></p></td><td  ><p><strong>Base/Boost Clock (GHz)</strong></p></td><td  ><p><strong>TDP / Maximum Power</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 9 9950X3D</p></td><td  ><p>100%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 5 X3D</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 32</p></td><td  ><p>4.3 / 5.7</p></td><td  ><p>170W / 230W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 9 9950X</p></td><td  ><p>96.8%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 5</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 32</p></td><td  ><p>4.7 / 5/7</p></td><td  ><p>170W / 230W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core Ultra 7 270K Plus</p></td><td  ><p>95.6%</p></td><td  ><p>Arrow Lake Refresh</p></td><td  ><p>24 / 24 (8+16)</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 5.5</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 250W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core Ultra 9 285K</p></td><td  ><p>88.7%</p></td><td  ><p>Arrow Lake</p></td><td  ><p>24 / 24 (8+16)</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 5.7</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 250W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 9 7950X</p></td><td  ><p>88%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 4</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 32</p></td><td  ><p>4.5 / 5.7</p></td><td  ><p>170W / 230W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 9 7950X3D</p></td><td  ><p>84.4%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 4 X3D</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 32</p></td><td  ><p>4.2 / 5.7</p></td><td  ><p>120W / 162W </p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i9-14900K</p></td><td  ><p>83.9%</p></td><td  ><p>Raptor Lake Refresh</p></td><td  ><p>24 / 32 (8+16)</p></td><td  ><p>3.2 / 6</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 253W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i9-13900K</p></td><td  ><p>81%</p></td><td  ><p>Raptor Lake</p></td><td  ><p>24 / 32 (8+16)</p></td><td  ><p>3 / 5.8</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 253W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core Ultra 7 265K</p></td><td  ><p>78.9%</p></td><td  ><p>Arrow Lake</p></td><td  ><p>20 / 20 (8+12)</p></td><td  ><p>3.9 / 5.5</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 250W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 9 9900X3D</p></td><td  ><p>77%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 5 X3D</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 24</p></td><td  ><p>4.4 / 5.5</p></td><td  ><p>120W / 230W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 9 9900X</p></td><td  ><p>76.7%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 5</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 24</p></td><td  ><p>4.4 / 5.6</p></td><td  ><p>120W / 162W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i7-14700K</p></td><td  ><p>75.1%</p></td><td  ><p>Raptor Lake Refresh</p></td><td  ><p>20 / 28 (8+12)</p></td><td  ><p>3.4 / 5.6</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 253W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core Ultra 5 250K Plus</p></td><td  ><p>70.9%</p></td><td  ><p>Arrow Lake Refresh</p></td><td  ><p>18 / 18 (6+12)</p></td><td  ><p>4.2 / 5.3</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 159W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i7-13700K</p></td><td  ><p>67.1%</p></td><td  ><p>Raptor Lake</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 24 (8+8)</p></td><td  ><p>3.4 / 5.4</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 253W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 9 7900X3D</p></td><td  ><p>63.9%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 4 X3D</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 24</p></td><td  ><p>4.4 / 5.6</p></td><td  ><p>120W / 162W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 7 9850X3D</p></td><td  ><p>57%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 5 X3D</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>4.7 / 5.6</p></td><td  ><p>120W / 162W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 7 9800X3D</p></td><td  ><p>56.9%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 5 X3D</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>4.7 / 5.2 </p></td><td  ><p>120W / 162W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core Ultra 5 245K</p></td><td  ><p>55.8%</p></td><td  ><p>Arrow Lake</p></td><td  ><p>14 / 14 (6+8)</p></td><td  ><p>4.2 / 5.2</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 159W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i5-14600K</p></td><td  ><p>53.9%</p></td><td  ><p>Raptor Lake Refresh</p></td><td  ><p>14 / 20 (6+8)</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 5.3</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 181W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i7-12700K</p></td><td  ><p>51.9%</p></td><td  ><p>Alder Lake</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 20 (8+4)</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 5</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 190W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i5-13600K</p></td><td  ><p>50.3%</p></td><td  ><p>Raptor Lake</p></td><td  ><p>14 / 20 (6+8)</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 5.1</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 181W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 7 9700X / 105W TDP</p></td><td  ><p>47.2% / 53.2%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 5</p></td><td  ><p>8 /16</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 5.5</p></td><td  ><p>65W / 88W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 7 7700X</p></td><td  ><p>46.8%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 4</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>4.5 / 5.4</p></td><td  ><p>105W / 142W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 7 7800X3D</p></td><td  ><p>44.5%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 4 X3D</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>4.2 / 5</p></td><td  ><p>120W / 162W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 5 9600X / 105W TDP</p></td><td  ><p>39.7% / 41.7%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 5</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.9 / 5.4</p></td><td  ><p>65W / 88W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i5-12600K</p></td><td  ><p>39.5%</p></td><td  ><p>Alder Lake</p></td><td  ><p>10 / 16 (6+4)</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 4.9</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 150W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core Ultra 5 225</p></td><td  ><p>38.5%</p></td><td  ><p>Arrow Lake</p></td><td  ><p>10 / 10 (6+4)</p></td><td  ><p>3.3 / 4.9</p></td><td  ><p>65W / 121W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 5 7600X3D</p></td><td  ><p>33.1%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 4 X3D</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>4.1 / 4.7</p></td><td  ><p>65W / 88W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i5-14400</p></td><td  ><p>32.7%</p></td><td  ><p>Raptor Lake</p></td><td  ><p>10 / 16 (6+4)</p></td><td  ><p>2.5 / 4.7</p></td><td  ><p>65W / 154W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 5 7600X</p></td><td  ><p>31.3%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 4</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>4.7 / 5.3</p></td><td  ><p>105W / 142W</p></td></tr></tbody></table></div><p>Similar to single-threaded rankings, we use a subset of the total tests we run for CPU reviews in ranking multithreaded performance. Cinebench and POV-ray show up here again, this time using as many threads as possible, alongside VRay, four Blender tests, and Handbrake using various codecs. Although most applications will leverage multiple threads these days, we’re specifically looking at applications that will take as many threads as possible to maximize compute. </p><p>Compared to single-threaded workloads, heavily-threaded tasks are less concerned with clock speed and put a greater emphasis on interconnects and core-to-core latency. Core count is obviously important, as well, though it’s been somewhat undermined by Intel’s hybrid architectures over the last several generations. </p><p>Given that we’re spanning multiple nodes, core count alone isn’t indicative of higher multithreaded performance. Yes, higher core counts within the same generation will usually provide higher multithreaded performance, but a slew of other factors can increase performance, as well, from all-core and uncore frequencies to higher transistor density. Because of the wide swath of factors, you can see much more aggressive scaling with our multithreaded rankings compared to single-threaded rankings.</p><h3 class="article-body__section" id="section-integrated-gpu-gaming-cpu-benchmarks-rankings-2026"><span>Integrated GPU Gaming CPU Benchmarks Rankings 2026</span></h3><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/foCxx4vhCPeaBJafxHACia.png" alt="CPU integrated GPU Hierarchy" /><figcaption><small role="credit">Tom's Hardware</small></figcaption></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/fsJpoB2CKJPPggf9PGCnoP.png" alt="CPU Benchmark Hierarchy" /><figcaption><small role="credit">Tom's Hardware</small></figcaption></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/6tMHFEAseZKBWuTNERSPtP.png" alt="CPU Benchmark Hierarchy" /><figcaption><small role="credit">Tom's Hardware</small></figcaption></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ohj5E7FwgV5SZZkYhqqida.png" alt="CPU integrated GPU Hierarchy" /><figcaption><small role="credit">Tom's Hardware</small></figcaption></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/EwPnsnPmSVV7tLHaXQE4Ra.png" alt="CPU integrated GPU Hierarchy" /><figcaption><small role="credit">Tom's Hardware</small></figcaption></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/b9LXLSTXohcBV4Sb8ja45Q.png" alt="CPU Benchmark Hierarchy" /><figcaption><small role="credit">Tom's Hardware</small></figcaption></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/2iwg9upZXomq58VMFW3KXa.png" alt="CPU integrated GPU Hierarchy" /><figcaption><small role="credit">Tom's Hardware</small></figcaption></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/usbGTexQEpAtyjFyhcpzxP.png" alt="CPU Benchmark Hierarchy" /><figcaption><small role="credit">Tom's Hardware</small></figcaption></figure></figure><div ><table><caption>iGPU Performance relative to Ryzen 7 5700G</caption><tbody><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p> </p></td><td  ><p>1280x720</p></td><td  ><p>1920x1080</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p><strong>Ryzen 7 5700G B550-E </strong></p></td><td  ><p><strong>100%</strong></p></td><td  ><p><strong>100%</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p><strong>Ryzen 5 5600G</strong></p></td><td  ><p><strong>96.3%</strong></p></td><td  ><p><strong>96%</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 7 4750G</p></td><td  ><p>92.9%</p></td><td  ><p>94.1%</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 3 5300G</p></td><td  ><p>85.8%</p></td><td  ><p>87.2%</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 5 3400G</p></td><td  ><p>83.5%</p></td><td  ><p>84.1%</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 3 3200G</p></td><td  ><p>77.1%</p></td><td  ><p>78.1%</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel UHD Graphics 750 32 EU (11600K, 11700K)</p></td><td  ><p>58.3%</p></td><td  ><p>~48.9%</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel UHD Graphics 730 24 EU (i5-11400)</p></td><td  ><p>51.7%</p></td><td  ><p>42.9%</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel UHD Graphics 630 24 EU (10600K)</p></td><td  ><p>36.0%</p></td><td  ><p>34.4%</p></td></tr></tbody></table></div><p>Here's our list of gaming performance with integrated graphics on several of the leading APUs available. We've split this into two different price ranges, so be sure to flip through all of the performance charts. For a bit of commentary and analysis of these results, head to our <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amds-ryzen-cezanne-apus-coming-to-retail-for-desktop-pcs">Ryzen 7 5700G</a>, <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-5-5600g-review">Ryzen 5 5600G</a>, and <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-ryzen-3-5300g-review">Ryzen 3 5300G</a> reviews. The most powerful chip gets a 100, and all others are scored relative to it.</p><h3 class="article-body__section" id="section-how-to-benchmark-your-cpu"><span>How to Benchmark your CPU</span></h3><p>It’s important to know how to benchmark your CPU. It gives you a way to compare performance <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/how-to/how-to-overclock-a-cpu"><u>after an overclock</u></a> or a CPU upgrade, and it allows you to check if you’re getting the full performance out of your system. Maybe a poor CPU cooler mount is limiting your performance, or maybe your BIOS settings aren’t optimal. Using benchmarks to compare your results lets you see where your rig stacks up, not only for leaderboard purposes, but also basic troubleshooting. </p><p>The key to benchmarking your CPU is consistency. The only variable that should change is your CPU, be it a new CPU or an overclock/undervolt. Before starting, make sure to close any applications running in the background. That’s not only to net peak performance, but also to avoid any inconsistencies between runs. Background apps can gobble up threads inconsistently, making it difficult to compare your results from run to run. </p><p>If you want more consistency, you can optionally run the following command before benchmarking in an elevated command prompt: </p><p><em>Rundll32.exe advapi32.dll,ProcessIdleTasks</em></p><p>This will force Windows to perform the background tasks it normally does when your PC is idle. It’s not essential, but it’s a good sanity check to make sure there’s nothing interfering with your results. </p><p>For applications, you want to test the apps you actually use. If you use the Adobe suite, for example, you can download and use PugetBench for free and compare your results with Puget’s database. A lot of apps don’t have these easy-to-use benchmarking tools and databases, so you need to find a proxy. For instance, Procyon Office measures Microsoft Office performance, but a license costs nearly $1,600 per year. PCMark 10 Basic, which is free, measures open-source office applications. Below, we have some of our favorite free benchmarks for comparing CPU performance. </p><p>In games, you can take two approaches: manual or automated. Some modern games include built-in benchmarking tools, such as <em>Cyberpunk 2077 </em>and <em>Doom: The Dark Ages, </em>and although they aren’t perfect, they’re easy to run and highly repeatable. The best way to measure CPU gaming performance, however, is manual benchmarking. </p><p>That involves finding a scene where you can go over a specific path repeatedly. That could be starting from a specific checkpoint that you can reload or resorting to a manual save where you start from the exact same position. Regardless, it’s important to avoid randomness in your testing. Keep the path consistent — for example, a walking path through a town — and try not to swing the camera around. </p><p>For measuring performance in games, you’ll need a performance monitoring tool. There are simple apps like <a href="https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/technologies/frameview/"><u>Nvidia’s FrameView</u></a>, which logs a ton of information but is a little cumbersome to deal with; it exports data to spreadsheets. <a href="https://www.capframex.com/"><u>CapFrameX</u></a> is a good alternative, which uses the same backend as FrameView (Intel’s PresentMon), but comes with a user-friendly GUI and extra features like the ability to generate charts right in the app. </p><p>After you run your benchmarks, you need a comparison point. Databases like Puget are your best resources on that front. If you’re comparing results to reviews, forum threads, or other systems, keep in mind the variables that can influence performance. It’s not a good idea to compare performance with uncontrolled variables unless you have a wide swath of comparison points. </p><h3 class="article-body__section" id="section-best-cpu-benchmarks-you-can-run"><span>Best CPU Benchmarks You Can Run</span></h3><ul><li><a href="https://www.maxon.net/en/downloads/cinebench-downloads"><u>Cinebench 2026</u></a> – Cinebench is the quintessential CPU benchmark, used almost universally in reviews, and it’s completely free to download and use.</li><li><a href="https://www.geekbench.com/"><u>Geekbench 6</u></a> – Geekbench has a number of issues, but it offers a massive database for comparing your system against other similar systems. And it’s free to download and run.</li><li><a href="https://opendata.blender.org/"><u>Blender</u></a> – Blender has a benchmarking utility with a GUI that’s free to download, as well as a large database of results.</li><li><a href="https://store.steampowered.com/app/524390/PCMark_10/"><u>PCMark 10 Basic</u></a> – The main PCMark 10 benchmark is free to use with the Basic edition, allowing you to test productivity performance with open-source office apps, as well as compare your scores with UL’s database.</li><li><a href="https://handbrake.fr/"><u>Handbrake</u></a> – Handbrake is a powerful, free, and open-source video transcoding tool, and it’s easy to run benchmarks with. Use any video file, make sure your settings are the same, and start a stopwatch to measure the time encoding takes. Lower is better.</li><li><a href="https://www.principledtechnologies.com/benchmarkxprt/webxprt/"><u>WebXPRT 5</u></a> – WebXPRT runs a variety of web applications directly in your browser, for free, and with a database to compare results to. It takes a while to run, however.</li><li><a href="https://browserbench.org/JetStream2.0/"><u>JetStream 2</u></a> – JetStream is a faster browser-based benchmark, though it doesn’t have a database of results.</li><li><a href="https://www.cpuid.com/softwares/cpu-z.html"><u>CPU-Z</u></a> – CPU-Z isn’t a reliable benchmark for real-world performance, but it includes single- and multithreaded tests, it’s easy to run, and you’ll find results online almost as commonly as Cinebench results.</li><li><a href="https://www.numberworld.org/y-cruncher/"><u>Y-cruncher</u></a> – This test calculates Pi with digit extraction, and it’s accelerated with SIMD instructions like AVX. You can only run it from a command line, but it’s relatively straightforward.</li><li><a href="https://www.pugetsystems.com/pugetbench/creators/"><u>PugetBench</u></a> – Puget includes benchmarks for the biggest apps in the Adobe suite, as well as DaVinci Resolve. The benchmark itself is free, and Puget maintains a large database. You’ll need a license for the applications it tests, however.</li></ul><h3 class="article-body__section" id="section-2026-cpu-benchmarks-test-system-and-configuration"><span>2026 CPU Benchmarks Test System and Configuration</span></h3><div ><table><caption>2026 CPU Benchmarks Hierarchy Test Setup</caption><tbody><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p><strong>Intel LGA 1851 (Arrow Lake and Refresh)</strong></p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Motherboard</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/asrock-z890-taichi-atx-motherboard-intel-z890-lga-1851/p/N82E16813162169"><u>ASRock Z890 Taichi</u></a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>RAM</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/g-skill-trident-z5-rgb-series-32gb-ddr5-7200-cas-latency-cl34-desktop-memory-black/p/N82E16820374436"><u>2x16GB G.Skill Trident Z Neo RGB DDR5-7200</u></a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p><strong>Intel LGA 1700 (Raptor Lake, Alder Lake)</strong></p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Motherboard</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/msi-mpg-z790-carbon-wifi-atx-motherboard-intel-z790-lga-1700/p/N82E16813144563"><u>MSI MPG Z790 Carbon Wi-Fi</u></a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>RAM </p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/g-skill-trident-z5-rgb-series-32gb-ddr5-7200-cas-latency-cl34-desktop-memory-black/p/N82E16820374436"><u>2x16GB G.Skill Trident Z Neo RGB DDR5-7200</u></a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p><strong>AMD AM5 (Zen 5, Zen 4)</strong></p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Motherboard</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/msi-mpg-x870e-carbon-wifi-atx-motherboard-amd-x870e-am5/p/N82E16813144666"><u>MSI MPG X870E Carbon Wi-Fi</u></a>, <a href="https://www.newegg.com/gigabyte-x870e-aorus-elite-x3d-ice-atx-motherboard-amd-x870e-am5/p/N82E16813145595"><u>Gigabyte Aorus X870E Elite X3D ICE</u></a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>RAM</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/G-Skill-Trident-288-Pin-CL30-38-38-96-F5-6000J3038F16GX2-TZ5NR/dp/B0BF8FVLSL/"><u>2x16GB G.Skill Trident Z Neo RGB DDR5-6000</u></a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p><strong>All Systems</strong></p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Gaming CPU</p></td><td  ><p>Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Founder’s Edition</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Application GPU</p></td><td  ><p>Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founder’s Edition</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Cooler</p></td><td  ><p>Corsair iCue Link H150i RGB</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Storage</p></td><td  ><p>2TB Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>PSU</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/msi-atx12v-1000-w-up-to-90-power-supplies-black-mpg-a1000gs-pcie5/p/N82E16817701030"><u>MSI MPG A1000GS</u></a>, <a href="https://www.newegg.com/p/N82E16817233053"><u>Gigabyte UD1000GM PG5 V2</u></a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Other</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/ARCTIC-MX-4-2019-Performance-Durability/dp/B07LDK4F5R/"><u>Arctic MX-4 TIM</u></a>, Windows 11 Pro, Alamengda open test bench</p></td></tr></tbody></table></div><ul><li><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-ryzen-7-7800x3d-vs-intel-core-i9-13900k-vs-intel-core-7-13700K">AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K vs Core i7-13700K: Big Gaming Punch, Smaller Price Tag</a></li><li><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-ryzen-9-7950x3d-vs-intel-core-i9-13900k-faceoff">AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K Faceoff: Battle of the Gaming Flagships</a></li><li><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-core-i5-13600k-vs-amd-ryzen-7-7700x-and-ryzen-5-7600x-face-off">Intel Core i5-13600K vs AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and Ryzen 5 7600X Face Off</a></li><li><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-ryzen-9-7950x-vs-intel-core-i9-13900k">AMD Ryzen 9 7950X vs Intel Core i9-13900K Face Off</a></li><li><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/ryzen-7-5800x3d-vs-core-i7-12700k-and-core-i9-12900k-face-off-the-rise-of-3d-v-cache">Ryzen 7 5800X3D vs Core i7-12700K and Core i9-12900K Face-Off: The Rise of 3D V-Cache</a></li><li><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-core-i9-12900k-vs-ryzen-9-5900x-5950x">Intel Core i9-12900K vs Ryzen 9 5900X and 5950X: Alder Lake and Ryzen 5000 Face Off</a></li><li><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-core-i5-12600k-vs-amd-ryzen-5-5600x-ryzen-7-5800x-cpu-face-off">Intel Core i5-12600K vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X and 5800X Face Off: Ryzen Has Fallen</a></li><li><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-core-i7-12700k-vs-amd-ryzen-9-5900x-and-5800x-face-off-intel-rising">Intel Core i7-12700K vs AMD Ryzen 9 5900X and 5800X Face Off: Intel Rising</a></li><li><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-core-i5-12400-vs-amd-ryzen-5-5600x-ryzen-5-5600g-cpu-face-off">Intel Core i5-12400 vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Face-Off: The Gaming Value Showdown</a></li></ul><ul><li><strong>MORE: </strong><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html"><strong>Best CPUs for Gaming</strong></a></li><li><strong>MORE: </strong><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/features/amd-vs-intel-cpus"><strong>AMD vs Intel</strong></a></li><li><strong>MORE: </strong><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-13th-gen-raptor-lake-release-date-specifications-pricing-benchmarks-all-we-know-specs"><strong>13th-Gen Raptor Lake</strong></a><strong> All We Know</strong></li><li><strong>MORE: </strong><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-zen-4-ryzen-7000-release-date-specifications-pricing-benchmarks-all-we-know-specs"><strong>Zen 4 Ryzen 7000</strong></a><strong> All We Know</strong></li><li><strong>MORE: </strong><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/how-to/how-to-overclock-a-cpu"><strong>How to Overclock a CPU</strong></a></li><li><strong>MORE: </strong><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/how-to/how-to-check-cpu-temp-temperature"><strong>How to check CPU Temperature</strong></a></li><li><strong>MORE: </strong><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus"><strong>All CPUs Content</strong></a></li></ul><iframe src="https://content.jwplatform.com/players/dBMx1ASv.html" id="dBMx1ASv" title="How to Choose a CPU" width="960" height="540" frameborder="0" scrolling="auto" allowfullscreen></iframe><h2 id="2020-2022-cpu-benchmarks-hierarchy">2020 - 2022 CPU Benchmarks Hierarchy</h2><p>You can find our rankings of the most current-gen systems on the previous page. The results below are from our legacy benchmarks, using a different GPU and test systems than our current CPU benchmark rankings. However, this provides great historical context and also includes other previous-gen CPUs not included in our new test suite. You'll also find our even older legacy rankings further below. These date back over the last decade. </p><h3 class="article-body__section" id="section-legacy-2020-2022-cpu-benchmarks-rankings-windows-10-and-11"><span>Legacy: 2020 - 2022 CPU Benchmarks Rankings - Windows 10 and 11</span></h3><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/W3GU8Pq99LYcsUEy2S4VDU.png" alt="AMD vs Intel" /><figcaption><small role="credit">Tom's Hardware</small></figcaption></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/8zpwaQ5zkgAcSqUiGV6WHU.png" alt="AMD vs Intel" /><figcaption><small role="credit">Tom's Hardware</small></figcaption></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/CSLXSfQjq2bTunXW2UkAKe.png" alt="ADM vs Intel" /><figcaption><small role="credit">Tom's Hardware</small></figcaption></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/6MzkyuxZSyNt83WsyTv3Pe.png" alt="ADM vs Intel" /><figcaption><small role="credit">Tom's Hardware</small></figcaption></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/TtBSDqmGUKepDNWDbbXuAX.png" alt="Ryzen 9 7900X" /><figcaption><small role="credit">Tom's Hardware</small></figcaption></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/PbB2zxcydzbPBQeDyBPd7X.png" alt="Ryzen 9 7900X" /><figcaption><small role="credit">Tom's Hardware</small></figcaption></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/4Uo9Th9CnSTFd5yNUiN4JX.png" alt="Ryzen 9 7900X" /><figcaption><small role="credit">Tom's Hardware</small></figcaption></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/WGeGcXEDvTRFZD5YPatCFX.png" alt="Ryzen 9 7900X" /><figcaption><small role="credit">Tom's Hardware</small></figcaption></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/3xYB9Tgp4kjiSdweatEzDf.png" alt="CPU Benchmark" /><figcaption><small role="credit">Tom's Hardware</small></figcaption></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/nWEViwJ93FJJRpazc8eFu9.png" alt="Ryzen 7 5800X3D" /><figcaption><small role="credit">Tom's Hardware</small></figcaption></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/hXCZtqtAcLQUqXUDFCADm9.png" alt="Ryzen 7 5800X3D" /><figcaption><small role="credit">Tom's Hardware</small></figcaption></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/LBommkJKQ2nZNaM9v6tMg9.png" alt="Ryzen 7 5800X3D" /><figcaption><small role="credit">Tom's Hardware</small></figcaption></figure></figure><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/F8LbVqh2HanAaMDUKLVFZi.png" alt="CPU Hierarchy" /><figcaption><small role="credit">Tom's Hardware</small></figcaption></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/SAXoWK6BiNQ6mAMLbEALVi.png" alt="CPU Hierarchy" /><figcaption><small role="credit">Tom's Hardware</small></figcaption></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/XUq9Uh9x2UTT97fTGZMbci.png" alt="CPU Hierarchy" /><figcaption><small role="credit">Tom's Hardware</small></figcaption></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/P8r3x46ksaXGfFN5Uxvmgi.png" alt="CPU Hierarchy" /><figcaption><small role="credit">Tom's Hardware</small></figcaption></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/bXyPwEFZ44q8ofZTc4drMi.png" alt="CPU Hierarchy" /><figcaption><small role="credit">Tom's Hardware</small></figcaption></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/tmxXxdMiJ5cbd6qepgJyRi.png" alt="CPU Hierarchy" /><figcaption><small role="credit">Tom's Hardware</small></figcaption></figure></figure><h3 class="article-body__section" id="section-legacy-2020-2022-gaming-cpu-benchmarks-ranking"><span>Legacy: 2020 - 2022 Gaming CPU Benchmarks Ranking</span></h3><div ><table><caption>Legacy: Gaming CPU Benchmarks Hierarchy 2020 - 2022 - Windows 11</caption><thead><tr><th class="firstcol " ><p> </p></th><th  ><p>1080p Gaming Score</p></th><th  ><p>1440p Gaming Score</p></th><th  ><p>Architecture</p></th><th  ><p>Cores/Threads (P+E)</p></th><th  ><p>Base/Boost GHz</p></th><th  ><p>TDP - MTP</p></th><th  ><p>Buy</p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>$589 - Core i9-13900K</p></td><td  ><p>100.00%</p></td><td  ><p>100.00%</p></td><td  ><p>Raptor Lake</p></td><td  ><p>24 / 32 (8+16)</p></td><td  ><p>3.0 / 5.8</p></td><td  ><p>125 / 253W</p></td><td  ><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>$409 - Core i7-13700K</p></td><td  ><p>96.09%</p></td><td  ><p>97.09%</p></td><td  ><p>Raptor Lake</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 24 (8+8)</p></td><td  ><p>3.4 / 5.4</p></td><td  ><p>125 / 253W</p></td><td  ><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>$365 - Ryzen 7 5800X3D</p></td><td  ><p>94.42%</p></td><td  ><p>97.45%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.4 / 4.5</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td><td  ><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>$319 - Core i5-13600K</p></td><td  ><p>90.03%</p></td><td  ><p>92.94%</p></td><td  ><p>Raptor Lake</p></td><td  ><p>14 / 20 (6+8)</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 5.1</p></td><td  ><p>125 / 181W</p></td><td  ><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>$474 - Ryzen 9 7900X</p></td><td  ><p>87.40%</p></td><td  ><p>90.52%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 4</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 24</p></td><td  ><p>4.7 / 5.6</p></td><td  ><p>170 / 230W</p></td><td  ><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>$569 - Ryzen 9 7950X</p></td><td  ><p>87.25%</p></td><td  ><p>90.27%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 4</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 32</p></td><td  ><p>4.5 / 5.7</p></td><td  ><p>170 / 230W</p></td><td  ><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>$349 - Ryzen 7 7700X</p></td><td  ><p>87.13%</p></td><td  ><p>91.55%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 4</p></td><td  ><p>8 /16</p></td><td  ><p>4.5 / 5.4</p></td><td  ><p>105 / 142W</p></td><td  ><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>$329 - Ryzen 7 7700</p></td><td  ><p>86.19%</p></td><td  ><p>88.88%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 4</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 5.3</p></td><td  ><p>65 / 88W</p></td><td  ><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>$429 - Ryzen 9 7900</p></td><td  ><p>84.75%</p></td><td  ><p>88.46%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 4</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 24</p></td><td  ><p>4.7 / 5.6</p></td><td  ><p>170 / 230W</p></td><td  ><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>$249 - Ryzen 5 7600X</p></td><td  ><p>83.62%</p></td><td  ><p>88.44%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 4</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>4.7 / 5.3</p></td><td  ><p>105 / 142W</p></td><td  ><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>$229 - Ryzen 5 7600</p></td><td  ><p>79.74%</p></td><td  ><p>85.97%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 4</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 5.1</p></td><td  ><p>65 / 88W</p></td><td  ><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>$550 - Ryzen 9 5950X</p></td><td  ><p>72.04%</p></td><td  ><p>77.51%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 32</p></td><td  ><p>3.4 / 4.9</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td><td  ><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>$350 - Ryzen 9 5900X</p></td><td  ><p>71.69%</p></td><td  ><p>78.95%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 24</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 4.8</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td><td  ><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>$235 - Ryzen 7 5800X</p></td><td  ><p>70.90%</p></td><td  ><p>78.19%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 4.7</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td><td  ><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>$210 - Ryzen 7 5700X</p></td><td  ><p>69.50%</p></td><td  ><p>76.65%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.4 / 4.6</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>$165 - Ryzen 5 5600X</p></td><td  ><p>67.52%</p></td><td  ><p>74.68%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 4.6</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>$189 - Core i5-12400</p></td><td  ><p>66.62%</p></td><td  ><p>73.53%</p></td><td  ><p>Alder Lake</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12 (6+0)</p></td><td  ><p>2.5 / 4.4</p></td><td  ><p>65 / 117W</p></td><td  ></td></tr></tbody></table></div><div ><table><caption>Legacy: Gaming CPU Benchmarks Hierarchy 2020 - 2022 - Windows 10</caption><thead><tr><th class="firstcol " ><p> </p></th><th  ><p><strong>1080p Gaming Score</strong></p></th><th  ><p><strong>1440p Gaming Score</strong></p></th><th  ><p><strong>CPU</strong></p></th><th  ><p><strong>Cores/Threads</strong></p></th><th  ><p><strong>Base/Boost GHz</strong></p></th><th  ><p><strong>TDP</strong></p></th><th  ><p><strong>Buy</strong></p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i9-12900K DDR4 / DDR5</p></td><td  ><p>100% / 93.51%</p></td><td  ><p>100% / 95.86%</p></td><td  ><p>Alder Lake</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 24 (8P+8E) </p></td><td  ><p>3.2 / 5.2 </p></td><td  ><p>125 / 241W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/intel-core-i9-12900k-core-i9-12th-gen/p/N82E16819118339?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback">Core i9-12900K </a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i9-11900K</p></td><td  ><p>92.48%</p></td><td  ><p>97.26%</p></td><td  ><p>Rocket Lake</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 5.3</p></td><td  ><p>125W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/intel-core-i9-11900k-core-i9-11th-gen/p/N82E16819118231?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback">Core i9-11900K</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-12700K DDR4 / DDR5</p></td><td  ><p>97.71% / 91.23%</p></td><td  ><p>99.8% / 97.30%</p></td><td  ><p>Alder Lake</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 20 (8P+4E)</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.9</p></td><td  ><p>125 / 190W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/intel-core-i7-12700k-core-i7-12th-gen/p/N82E16819118343?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback">Core i7-12700K </a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 9 5900X</p></td><td  ><p>90.98%</p></td><td  ><p>93.18%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 24</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 4.8</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-5900X-24-Thread-Processor/dp/B08164VTWH?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback">Ryzen 9 5900X</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-12600K DDR4 / DDR5</p></td><td  ><p>90.89% / 84.32%</p></td><td  ><p>96.94% / 92.33%</p></td><td  ><p>Alder Lake</p></td><td  ><p>10 / 16 (6P+4E)</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 4.9</p></td><td  ><p>125 / 150W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/intel-core-i5-12600k-core-i5-12th-gen/p/N82E16819118347?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback">Core i5-12600K </a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 9 5950X</p></td><td  ><p>90.22%</p></td><td  ><p>95.32%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 32</p></td><td  ><p>3.4 / 4.9</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/amd-ryzen-9-5950x/p/N82E16819113663?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback">Ryzen 9 5950X</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper Pro 5975WX</p></td><td  ><p>88.71%</p></td><td  ><p>89.71%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>32 / 64</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.5</p></td><td  ><p>280W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-ThreadripperTM-PRO-5975WX-64-Thread/dp/B0B5VH1WPC">Threadripper Pro 5975WX</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 5600X</p></td><td  ><p>88.51%</p></td><td  ><p>91.79%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 4.6</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.bestbuy.com/site/amd-ryzen-5-5600x-4th-gen-6-core-12-threads-unlocked-desktop-processor-with-wraith-stealth-cooler/6438943.p?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback">Ryzen 5 5600X</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 7 5800X</p></td><td  ><p>86.85%</p></td><td  ><p>91.72%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 4.7</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.bestbuy.com/site/amd-ryzen-7-5800x-4th-gen-8-core-16-threads-unlocked-desktop-processor-without-cooler/6439000.p?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback">Ryzen 7 5800X</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-11700K</p></td><td  ><p>86.3%</p></td><td  ><p>92.0%</p></td><td  ><p>Rocket Lake</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 5.0</p></td><td  ><p>125W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/intel-core-i7-11700k-core-i7-11th-gen/p/N82E16819118233?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback">Core i7-11700K</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper Pro 5995WX</p></td><td  ><p>86.12%</p></td><td  ><p>84.79%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>64 / 128</p></td><td  ><p>2.7 / 4.5</p></td><td  ><p>280W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-ThreadripperTM-5995WX-128-Thread-Processor/dp/B0B5VLPVL5">Threadripper Pro 5995WX</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i9-10900K</p></td><td  ><p>85.01%</p></td><td  ><p>91.5%</p></td><td  ><p>Comet Lake</p></td><td  ><p>10 / 20</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 5.3</p></td><td  ><p>125W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.bestbuy.com/site/intel-core-i9-10900k-10th-generation-10-core-20-thread-3-7-ghz-5-3-ghz-turbo-socket-lga1200-unlocked-desktop-processor/6411492.p?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback">Core i9-9900K</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i9-10850K</p></td><td  ><p>84.6%</p></td><td  ><p>91.07%</p></td><td  ><p>Comet Lake</p></td><td  ><p>10 / 20</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 5.2</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/intel-core-i9-10850k-core-i9-10th-gen/p/N82E16819118175?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback">Core i9-10850K</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-11600K</p></td><td  ><p>84.06%</p></td><td  ><p>90.43%</p></td><td  ><p>Rocket Lake</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.9 / 4.9</p></td><td  ><p>125W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/intel-core-i5-11600k-core-i5-11th-gen/p/N82E16819118235?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback">Core i5-11600K</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-11400</p></td><td  ><p>80.98%</p></td><td  ><p>87.77%</p></td><td  ><p>Rocket Lake</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>2.6 / 4.4</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Intel-i5-11400-Desktop-Processor-LGA1200/dp/B08X6JPK4K?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback">Core i5-11400</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-10700K</p></td><td  ><p>80.66%</p></td><td  ><p>87.88%</p></td><td  ><p>Comet Lake</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 5.1</p></td><td  ><p>125W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/intel-core-i7-10700k-core-i7-10th-gen/p/N82E16819118123?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback">Core i7-10700K</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i9-10980XE</p></td><td  ><p>78.04%</p></td><td  ><p>84.04%</p></td><td  ><p>Cascade Lake-X</p></td><td  ><p>18 / 36</p></td><td  ><p>3.0 / 4.8</p></td><td  ><p>165W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1507537-REG/intel_bx8069510980xe_core_i9_10980xe_3_0_ghz.html?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback">Core i9-10980XE</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel W-3175X</p></td><td  ><p>76.93%</p></td><td  ><p>82.58%</p></td><td  ><p>Skylake</p></td><td  ><p>28 / 56</p></td><td  ><p>3.1 / 4.3</p></td><td  ><p>225W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/p/N82E16819118010">@Newegg</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 7 5700G*</p></td><td  ><p>76.61%</p></td><td  ><p>83.1%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 4.6</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p>N/A</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i9-9900KS</p></td><td  ><p>76.12%</p></td><td  ><p>84.85%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake-R</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>4.0 / 5.0</p></td><td  ><p>127W </p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Intel-i9-9900KS-Processor-All-Core-Unlocked/dp/B07YP3J7ZM">Intel Core i9-9900KS</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-10700/F</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Comet Lake</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>2.9 / 4.8</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.bestbuy.com/site/intel-core-i7-10700-10th-generation-8-core-16-thread-2-9-ghz-4-8-ghz-turbo-socket-lga1200-locked-desktop-processor/6411495.p?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback">Intel Core i7-10700</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-10600K</p></td><td  ><p>75.42%</p></td><td  ><p>82.57%</p></td><td  ><p>Comet Lake</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>4.1 / 4.8</p></td><td  ><p>125W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/intel-core-i5-10600k-core-i5-10th-gen/p/N82E16819118124">@Newegg</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-9700K</p></td><td  ><p>73.62%</p></td><td  ><p>81.12%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake-R</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 8</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.9</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Intel-i7-9700K-Desktop-Processor-Unlocked/dp/B07HHN6KBZ">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i9-9900K / F</p></td><td  ><p>73.41%</p></td><td  ><p>84.85%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake-R</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 5.0</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/p/2MN-0004-00828?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback">Core i9-9900K</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 9 3950X</p></td><td  ><p>72.63%</p></td><td  ><p>78.58%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 32</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 4.7</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-3950X-32-Thread-Processor/dp/B07ZTYKLZW">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper 3970X</p></td><td  ><p>72.44%</p></td><td  ><p>77.99%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>32 / 64</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 4.5</p></td><td  ><p>280W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-Threadripper-3970X-64-Thread/dp/B0815JJQQ8">AMD Threadripper 3970X</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper 3960X</p></td><td  ><p>72.07%</p></td><td  ><p>77.12%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>24 / 48</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 4.5</p></td><td  ><p>280W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-Threadripper-3960X-48-Thread/dp/B0815JGCXP">AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 5600G</p></td><td  ><p>71.99%</p></td><td  ><p>76.76%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.9 / 4.4</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/amd-ryzen-5-5600g-ryzen-5-5000-g-series/p/N82E16819113683?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback">Ryzen 5 5600G </a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT</p></td><td  ><p>71.78%</p></td><td  ><p>79.28%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.9 / 4.7</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/amd-ryzen-7-3800xt-ryzen-7-3rd-gen/p/N82E16819113652">@Newegg</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper 3990X</p></td><td  ><p>71.68%</p></td><td  ><p>77.94%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>64 / 128</p></td><td  ><p>2.9 / 4.3</p></td><td  ><p>280W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-Threadripper-3990X-128-Thread/dp/B0815SBQ9W">AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT</p></td><td  ><p>71.67%</p></td><td  ><p>78.55%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 24</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 4.7</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-3900XT-24-Threads-Processor/dp/B089WD454D?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback">Ryzen 9 3900XT</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 9 3900X</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 24</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 4.6</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-3900X-24-Thread-Processor/dp/B07SXMZLP9">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i9-9980XE </p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Skylake</p></td><td  ><p>18 / 36</p></td><td  ><p>4.4 / 4.5</p></td><td  ><p>165W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1438940-REG/intel_bx80673i99980x_core_i9_9980xe_extreme_edition.html">@B&HPhoto</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 9 3900</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 24</p></td><td  ><p>3.1 / 4.3</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td><td  ><p>OEM only</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 7 3700X</p></td><td  ><p>71.43%</p></td><td  ><p>79.08%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.4</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-3700X-16-Thread-Processor/dp/B07SXMZLPK?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback">Ryzen 7 3700X </a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 7 3800X</p></td><td  ><p>71.3%</p></td><td  ><p>78.67%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.9 / 4.5</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-3800X-16-Thread-Processor/dp/B07SXMZLP?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback">Ryzen 7 3800X </a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT</p></td><td  ><p>70.62%</p></td><td  ><p>77.75%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 4.5</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/amd-ryzen-5-3600xt-ryzen-5-3rd-gen/p/N82E16819113653">@Newegg</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 3600</p></td><td  ><p>68.63%</p></td><td  ><p>75.59%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.2</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-3600-12-Thread-Processor/dp/B07STGGQ18">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i9-7960X</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Skylake</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 32</p></td><td  ><p>2.8 / 4.2</p></td><td  ><p>165W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?item=9SIA25V6K29201">@Newegg</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-8700K</p></td><td  ><p>68.47%</p></td><td  ><p>76.41%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 4.7</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Intel-BX80684I78700K-Core-i7-8700K-Processor/dp/B07598VZR8">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 3600X</p></td><td  ><p>68.41%</p></td><td  ><p>75.60%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 4.4</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/amd-ryzen-5-3600x/p/N82E16819113568">@Newegg</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper Pro 3975WX</p></td><td  ><p>67.63%</p></td><td  ><p>74.42%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>32 / 64</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 4.2</p></td><td  ><p>280W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-Threadripper-PRO-3975WX/dp/B08V5H7GPM">Threadripper Pro 3975WX</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 3 3300X</p></td><td  ><p>67.49%</p></td><td  ><p>74.6%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 8</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 4.3</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/amd-ryzen-3-3300x-ryzen-3-3rd-gen/p/N82E16819113648">@Newegg</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-9600K</p></td><td  ><p>67.06%</p></td><td  ><p>75.11%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake-R</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 6</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 4.6</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/core-i5-9th-gen-intel-core-i5-9600k/p/N82E16819117959">@Newegg</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper Pro 3995WX</p></td><td  ><p>66.18%</p></td><td  ><p>69.28%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>64 / 128</p></td><td  ><p>2.7 / 4.2</p></td><td  ><p>280W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/amd-ryzen-threadripper-pro-3995wx/p/N82E16819113675?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback">Threadripper Pro 3995WX</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-8600K</p></td><td  ><p>65.84%</p></td><td  ><p>73.4%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 6</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.3</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/intel-core-i5-8th-gen-core-i5-8600k/p/N82E16819117825">@Newegg</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-8700</p></td><td  ><p>65.57%</p></td><td  ><p>73.66%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.2 / 4.6</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/core-i7-8th-gen-intel-core-i7-8700/p/N82E16819117826?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback">Core i7-8700</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-8086K</p></td><td  ><p>65.05%</p></td><td  ><p>73.5%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>4.0 / 5.0</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://starmicroinc.net/intel-core-i7-8086k-4-0ghz-socket-1151-6-core-coffee-lake-s-desktop-boxed-cpu-srcx5-bx80684i78086k?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback">Core i7-8086K</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-9400 / i5-9400F</p></td><td  ><p>64.85%</p></td><td  ><p>72.08%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 6</p></td><td  ><p>2.9 / 4.1</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Intel-i5-9400F-Desktop-Processor-Graphics/dp/B07MRCGQQ4">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-8400</p></td><td  ><p>63.96%</p></td><td  ><p>71.2%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 6</p></td><td  ><p>2.8 / 4.0</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/core-i5-8th-gen-intel-core-i5-8400/p/N82E16819117824">@Newegg</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD  Ryzen 5 3500X</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 6</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.1</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/amd-ryzen-5-3500x/p/274-000M-001B6">@Newegg</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i3-10100</p></td><td  ><p>61.88%</p></td><td  ><p>69.08%</p></td><td  ><p>Comet Lake</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 8</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.3</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Intel-i3-10100-Desktop-Processor-LGA1200/dp/B086MMRW87?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback">Core i3-10100</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 7 2700X</p></td><td  ><p>59.19%</p></td><td  ><p>66.55%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen+</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 4.3</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/amd-ryzen-7-2700x/p/N82E16819113499">@Newegg</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 7 4750G*</p></td><td  ><p>58.43%</p></td><td  ><p>66.46%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 4.6</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Ryzen-4750G-Processor-3-6Ghz-Threads/dp/B08XYTM5QS?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback">Ryzen 7 4750G</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 3 3100</p></td><td  ><p>57.75%</p></td><td  ><p>64.21%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 8</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 3.9</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/amd-ryzen-3-3100-ryzen-3-3rd-gen/p/N82E16819113649">@Newegg</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i9-7980XE</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Skylake</p></td><td  ><p>18 / 36</p></td><td  ><p>2.6 / 4.2</p></td><td  ><p>165W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Intel-Core-i9-7980XE-Processors-BX80673I97980X/dp/B075XRYMDR">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i9-7900X</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Skylake</p></td><td  ><p>10 / 20</p></td><td  ><p>3.3 / 4.3</p></td><td  ><p>140W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/intel-core-i9-x-series-i9-7900x/p/N82E16819117795">@Newegg</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 2600X</p></td><td  ><p>57.55%</p></td><td  ><p>65.33%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen+</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.2</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-Processor-Wraith-Cooler/dp/B07B428V2L">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-7700K</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Kaby Lake</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 8</p></td><td  ><p>4.2 / 4.5</p></td><td  ><p>91W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Intel-Desktop-Processor-i7-7700K-BX80677I77700K/dp/B01MXSI216">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper 2990WX (GM)</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen+</p></td><td  ><p>32 / 64</p></td><td  ><p>3.0 / 4.2</p></td><td  ><p>250W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/amd-ryzen-threadripper-2990wx/p/N82E16819113541">@Newegg</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-7820X</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Skylake</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.3</p></td><td  ><p>140W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Intel-BX80673I77820X-Core-i7-7820X-Processor/dp/B072NF4BY3">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper 2950X (GM)</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen +</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 32</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 4.4</p></td><td  ><p>180W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-Threadripper-Processor-YD295XA8AFWOF/dp/B07GFN6CVF">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper 2970WX</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen +</p></td><td  ><p>24 / 48</p></td><td  ><p>3.0 / 4.2</p></td><td  ><p>250W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Threadripper-2990WX-Processor-YD299XAZAFWOF/dp/B07G25SD1P">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 7 2700</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen+</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.2 / 4.1</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-Processor-Wraith-Cooler/dp/B07B41717Z">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper 1900X (GM)</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 4.0</p></td><td  ><p>180W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Threadripper-16-thread-Processor-YD190XA8AEWOF/dp/B0754JNQBP">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-7700</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Kaby Lake</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 8</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.2</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Intel-BX80677I77700-Processor-Frequency-Generation/dp/B01N0L41N7">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 2600</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen+</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.4 / 3.9</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/amd-ryzen-5-2600/p/N82E16819113496">@Newegg</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-7800X</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Skylake</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 4.0</p></td><td  ><p>140W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/intel-core-i7-x-series-i7-7800x/p/N82E16819117793">@Newegg</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-7600K</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Kaby Lake</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 4.2</p></td><td  ><p>91W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Intel-i5-7600K-Desktop-Processors-BX80677I57600K/dp/B01MRRPPQS">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper 1950X (GM)</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 32</p></td><td  ><p>3.4 / 4.0</p></td><td  ><p>180W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/amd-ryzen-threadripper-1950x/p/N82E16819113447">@Newegg</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper 1920X (GM)</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 24</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 4.0</p></td><td  ><p>180W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Threadripper-24-thread-Processor-YD192XA8AEWOF/dp/B074CBJHCT">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-9350KF</p></td><td  ><p>56.42%</p></td><td  ><p>65.19%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>4.0 / 4.6</p></td><td  ><p>91W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07NC419VF">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 3 5300G</p></td><td  ><p>55.54%</p></td><td  ><p>62.68%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 8</p></td><td  ><p>4.0 / 4.2</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p>OEM Only</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 7 1800X</p></td><td  ><p>53.86%</p></td><td  ><p>60.83%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.0</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/p/N82E16819113430">@Newegg</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-7600</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Kaby Lake</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 4.1</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Intel-BX80677I57600-Core-Desktop-Processors/dp/B01MYTYSMK">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-8100</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / -</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Intel-i3-8100-Desktop-Processor-Unlocked/dp/B0759FTRZL">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-7500</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Kaby Lake</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.4 / 3.8</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Intel-i5-7500-Desktop-Processor-BX80677I57500/dp/B01MZZJ1P0">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-7400</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Kaby Lake</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.0 / 3.5</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Intel-i5-9400-Processor-Processors-984507/dp/B07MGZ9FJZ">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 7 1700X</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 3.9</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-1700X-Processor-YD170XBCAEWOF/dp/B06X3W9NGG">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen +</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.2 / 3.6</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Processor-Wraith-Cooler-YD1600BBAEBOX/dp/B06XNRQHG4">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 7 1700</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.0 / 3.8</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/amd-ryzen-7-1700/p/N82E16819113428">@Newegg</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-8350K</p></td><td  ><p>53.84%</p></td><td  ><p>61.82%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>4.0 / -</p></td><td  ><p>91W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/core-i3-8th-gen-intel-core-i3-8350k/p/274-000A-003A2?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback">Core i3 i3-8350K</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-9100</p></td><td  ><p>51.96%</p></td><td  ><p>60.1%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake-R</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.2</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/intel-core-i3-9th-gen-core-i3-9100/p/N82E16819118022">@Newegg</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 1600X</p></td><td  ><p>49.99%</p></td><td  ><p>57.28%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.0</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-1600X-Processor-YD160XBCAEWOF/dp/B06XKWT7GD">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 1600</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.2 / 3.6</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Processor-Wraith-Cooler-YD1600BBAEBOX/dp/B06XNRQHG4">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 3400G</p></td><td  ><p>48.81%</p></td><td  ><p>55.73%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen +</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 8</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 4.2</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-3400G-8-Thread-Processor/dp/B07SXNDKNM">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-7400</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Kaby Lake</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4 </p></td><td  ><p>3.0 / 3.5</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/core-i5-7th-gen-intel-core-i5-7400/p/N82E16819117731">@Newegg</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-8100</p></td><td  ><p>48.43%</p></td><td  ><p>59.7%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / -</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Intel-i3-8100-Desktop-Processor-Unlocked/dp/B0759FTRZL">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 3 3200G</p></td><td  ><p>45.96%</p></td><td  ><p>52.98%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen +</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.0</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-3200G-Unlocked-Processor/dp/B07STGHZK8">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 2400G</p></td><td  ><p>44.84%</p></td><td  ><p>50.67%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen+</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 8</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 3.9</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/amd-ryzen-5-2400g/p/N82E16819113480">@Newegg</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 1500X</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 8</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 3.7</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/amd-ryzen-5-1500x/p/N82E16819113436">@Newegg</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-7350K</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Kaby Lake</p></td><td  ><p>2 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>4.2 / -</p></td><td  ><p>60W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/core-i3-7th-gen-intel-core-i3-7350k/p/N82E16819117772">@Newegg</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G5600</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>2 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.9 / -</p></td><td  ><p>54W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/intel-pentium-gold-g5600/p/N82E16819117879">@Newegg</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 3 2200G</p></td><td  ><p>42.16%</p></td><td  ><p>48.56%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen+</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 3.7</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-3200G-Unlocked-Processor/dp/B07STGHZK8">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 3 1300X</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 3.7</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Desktop-Processor-Stealth-YD130XBBAEBOX/dp/B0741DLVL7">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-7300</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Kaby Lake</p></td><td  ><p>2 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>4.0 / -</p></td><td  ><p>51W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1304302-REG/intel_bx80677i37300_core_i3_7300_4_0_ghz.html">@BH&Photo</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G5600</p></td><td  ><p>37.52%</p></td><td  ><p>44.7%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>2 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.9 / -</p></td><td  ><p>54W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/129945/intel-pentium-gold-g5600-processor-4m-cache-3-90-ghz.html">@Intel</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G5400</p></td><td  ><p>36.57%</p></td><td  ><p>43.31%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>2 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / -</p></td><td  ><p>54W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Intel-Pentium-Desktop-Processor-BX80684G5400/dp/B0793BQS3R">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-7100</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Kaby Lake</p></td><td  ><p>2 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.9 / -</p></td><td  ><p>51W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Intel-i3-7100-Desktop-Processor-BX80677I37100/dp/B01NCESRJX">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 1400</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 8</p></td><td  ><p>3.2 / 3.4</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Processor-Wraith-Stealth-YD1400BBAEBOX/dp/B06XKWT8J4">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G4620</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Kaby Lake</p></td><td  ><p>2 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / -</p></td><td  ><p>54W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/intel-pentium-g4620/p/N82E16819117736">@Newegg</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G4560</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Kaby Lake</p></td><td  ><p>2 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / -</p></td><td  ><p>54W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/intel-pentium-g4560/p/N82E16819117743">@Newegg</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Athlon 3000G</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen+</p></td><td  ><p>2 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / -</p></td><td  ><p>35W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-4-Thread-Unlocked-Processor-Graphics/dp/B0815JGFQ8">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Athlon 240GE</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen</p></td><td  ><p>2 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / -</p></td><td  ><p>35W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Athlon-Radeon-Graphics-Processor/dp/B07L9V9F6H">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Athlon 220GE</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen</p></td><td  ><p>2 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.4 / -</p></td><td  ><p>35W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Athlon-Radeon-Graphics-Processor/dp/B07L9Q7DLQ">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Athlon 200GE</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen</p></td><td  ><p>2 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.2 / -</p></td><td  ><p>35W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-4-Thread-Processor-Graphics-YD200GC6FBBOX/dp/B07HJWVJDN">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 3 1200</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.1 / 3.2</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Desktop-Processor-Stealth-YD1200BBAEBOX/dp/B0741DN383">@Amazon</a></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-U6780A</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>LuJiaZui </p></td><td  ><p>8 / 8</p></td><td  ><p>2.7 / -</p></td><td  ><p>70W</p></td><td  ><p>N/A</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD A10-9700</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Bristol Ridge</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 3.8</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.newegg.com/amd-a10-7th-gen-a10-9700/p/N82E16819113451">@Newegg</a></p></td></tr></tbody></table></div><p>These tests are from our 2022 test bench. We measured performance for the 1080p CPU gaming benchmarks with a geometric mean of <em>Borderlands 3</em>, <em>Hitman 2</em>, <em>Far Cry 5</em>, <em>Project CARS 3</em>, <em>Red Dead Redemption 2</em>, and <em>Shadow of the Tomb Raider</em>. We measured performance for the 1440p CPU gaming benchmarks with a geometric mean of <em>Borderlands 3</em>, <em>Project CARS 3</em>, <em>Far Cry 5</em>, <em>Red Dead Redemption 2</em>, and <em>Shadow of the Tomb Raider</em>. We conducted these tests in Windows 10.</p><h3 class="article-body__section" id="section-legacy-2020-2022-single-threaded-cpu-benchmarks-rankings"><span>Legacy: 2020 - 2022 Single-Threaded CPU Benchmarks Rankings</span></h3><div ><table><caption>Legacy: 2020 - 2022 Single-Threaded CPU Benchmarks Hierarchy - Windows 10</caption><thead><tr><th class="firstcol " ><p> </p></th><th  ><p>Single-Threaded App Score</p></th><th  ><p>Architecture</p></th><th  ><p>Cores/Threads</p></th><th  ><p>Base/Boost GHz</p></th><th  ><p>TDP</p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i9-11900K (ABT off/on)</p></td><td  ><p>100% / 99.57%</p></td><td  ><p>Rocket Lake</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 5.3</p></td><td  ><p>125W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 9 5950X</p></td><td  ><p>95.31%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 32</p></td><td  ><p>3.4 / 4.9</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i9-12900K DDR5 / DDR4</p></td><td  ><p>95.16% / 94.64%</p></td><td  ><p>Alder Lake</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 24 (8P+8E)</p></td><td  ><p>3.2 / 5.2</p></td><td  ><p>125 / 241W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i7-11700K</p></td><td  ><p>94.29%</p></td><td  ><p>Rocket Lake</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 5.0</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 9 5900X</p></td><td  ><p>93.69%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 24</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 4.8</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 7 5800X</p></td><td  ><p>92.84%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 4.7</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-11600K</p></td><td  ><p>92.56% / 89.67%</p></td><td  ><p>Rocket Lake</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.9 / 4.9</p></td><td  ><p>125W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-12700K DDR5 / DDR4</p></td><td  ><p>91.60%</p></td><td  ><p>Alder Lake</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 20 (8P+4E)</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.9</p></td><td  ><p>125W / 190W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper Pro 5975WX</p></td><td  ><p>89.25%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>64 / 128</p></td><td  ><p>2.7 / 4.5</p></td><td  ><p>280W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 5600X</p></td><td  ><p>89.19%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 4.6</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 7 5700G</p></td><td  ><p>88.92%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.9 / 4.4</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper Pro 5995WX</p></td><td  ><p>88.48%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>64 / 128</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.5</p></td><td  ><p>280W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i5-12600K DDR4 / DDR5</p></td><td  ><p>87.85% / 87.82%</p></td><td  ><p>Alder Lake</p></td><td  ><p>10 / 16 (6P+4E)</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 4.9</p></td><td  ><p>125 / 150W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i9-10900K</p></td><td  ><p>86.68%</p></td><td  ><p>Comet Lake</p></td><td  ><p>10 / 20</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 5.3</p></td><td  ><p>125W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 5600G</p></td><td  ><p>85.75%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.9 / 4.4</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i9-10850K</p></td><td  ><p>84.87%</p></td><td  ><p>Comet Lake</p></td><td  ><p>10 / 20</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 5.2</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i9-9900KS</p></td><td  ><p>83.13%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake-R</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>4.0 / 5.0</p></td><td  ><p>127W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-11400</p></td><td  ><p>83.09%</p></td><td  ><p>Rocket Lake</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>2.6 / 4.4</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i9-9900K</p></td><td  ><p>82.63%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake-R</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 5.0</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-10700K</p></td><td  ><p>82.31%</p></td><td  ><p>Comet Lake</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 5.1</p></td><td  ><p>125W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 3 5300G</p></td><td  ><p>81.51%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 8 </p></td><td  ><p>4.0 / 4.2</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-9700K</p></td><td  ><p>80.36%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake-R</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 8</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.9</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT</p></td><td  ><p>79.75%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.9 / 4.7</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT</p></td><td  ><p>79.11%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 4.5</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT</p></td><td  ><p>78.86%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 24</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 4.7</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-10600K</p></td><td  ><p>78.79%</p></td><td  ><p>Comet Lake</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>4.1 / 4.</p></td><td  ><p>125W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 7 3800X</p></td><td  ><p>78.37%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.9 / 4.5</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 9 3950X</p></td><td  ><p>78.18%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 32</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 4.7</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 9 3900X</p></td><td  ><p>77.68%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 24</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 4.6</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-10700/F</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Comet Lake</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>2.9 / 4.8</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 7 4750G</p></td><td  ><p>77.2%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen  3</p></td><td  ><p>8 /16</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.4</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper 3970X</p></td><td  ><p>76.52%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>32 / 64</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 4.5</p></td><td  ><p>280W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper 3960X</p></td><td  ><p>76.42%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>24 / 48</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 4.5</p></td><td  ><p>280W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper Pro 3975WX</p></td><td  ><p>76.36%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>32 / 64</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 4.2</p></td><td  ><p>280W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-8700K</p></td><td  ><p>76.32%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 4.7</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 7 3700X</p></td><td  ><p>76.29%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.4</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-8086K</p></td><td  ><p>76.21%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>4.0 / 5.0</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 3600X</p></td><td  ><p>75.85%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 4.4</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-9350KF</p></td><td  ><p>75.72%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>4.0 / 4.6</p></td><td  ><p>91W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 3 3300X</p></td><td  ><p>75.62%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 8</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 4.3</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-9600K</p></td><td  ><p>75.41%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake-R</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 6</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 4.6</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i9-10980XE</p></td><td  ><p>75.24%</p></td><td  ><p>Cascade Lake-X</p></td><td  ><p>18 / 36</p></td><td  ><p>3.0 / 4.8</p></td><td  ><p>165W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper 3990X</p></td><td  ><p>75.10%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>64 / 128</p></td><td  ><p>2.9 / 4.3</p></td><td  ><p>280W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-8700</p></td><td  ><p>74.66%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.2 / 4.6</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper Pro 3995WX</p></td><td  ><p>74.20%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>64 / 128</p></td><td  ><p>2.7 / 4.2</p></td><td  ><p>280W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 3600</p></td><td  ><p>73.02%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.2</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i9-9980XE</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Skylake</p></td><td  ><p>18 / 36</p></td><td  ><p>4.4 / 4.5</p></td><td  ><p>165W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-7700K</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Kaby Lake</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 8</p></td><td  ><p>4.2 / 4.5</p></td><td  ><p>91W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-8600K</p></td><td  ><p>71.08%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 6</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.3</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i3-10100</p></td><td  ><p>70.80%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 8</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.3</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 7 2700X</p></td><td  ><p>69.53%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen+</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 4.3</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-9100</p></td><td  ><p>69.20%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake-R</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.2</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 3 3100</p></td><td  ><p>67.74%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 8</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 3.9</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-9400 / -9400F</p></td><td  ><p>67.67%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 6</p></td><td  ><p>2.9 / 4.1</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Xeon W-3175X</p></td><td  ><p>67.51%</p></td><td  ><p>Skylake</p></td><td  ><p>28 / 56</p></td><td  ><p>3.1 / 3.8</p></td><td  ><p>225W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 2600X</p></td><td  ><p>66.78%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen+</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.2</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-8350K / -8350KF</p></td><td  ><p>66.71%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>4.0 / -</p></td><td  ><p>91W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-8400</p></td><td  ><p>66.03%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 6</p></td><td  ><p>2.8 / 4.0</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 3500X</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 6</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.1</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 9 3900</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 24</p></td><td  ><p>3.1 / 4.3</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-7100</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Kaby Lake</p></td><td  ><p>2 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.9 / -</p></td><td  ><p>51W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper 2950X</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen +</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 32</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 4.4</p></td><td  ><p>180W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper 2990WX</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen+</p></td><td  ><p>32 / 64</p></td><td  ><p>3.0 / 4.2</p></td><td  ><p>250W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper 2970WX</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen +</p></td><td  ><p>24 / 48</p></td><td  ><p>3.0 / 4.2</p></td><td  ><p>250W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 3400G</p></td><td  ><p>64.86%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen +</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 8</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 4.2</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 1600X</p></td><td  ><p>63.62%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.0</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 7 1800X</p></td><td  ><p>61.99%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.0</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-7400</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Kaby Lake</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4 </p></td><td  ><p>3.0 / 3.5</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 3 3200G</p></td><td  ><p>60.90%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen +</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.0</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 2400G</p></td><td  ><p>60.79%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen+</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 8</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 3.9</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 3 1300X</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 3.7</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.2 / 3.6</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G5600</p></td><td  ><p>60.13%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>2 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.9 / -</p></td><td  ><p>54W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-8100</p></td><td  ><p>60.12%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / -</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 3 2200G</p></td><td  ><p>57.09%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 3.7</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G5400</p></td><td  ><p>56.79%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>2 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / -</p></td><td  ><p>54W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Athlon 3000G</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen+</p></td><td  ><p>2 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / -</p></td><td  ><p>35W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Athlon 220GE</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen</p></td><td  ><p>2 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.4 / -</p></td><td  ><p>35W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G4560</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Kaby Lake</p></td><td  ><p>2 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / -</p></td><td  ><p>54W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Athlon 200GE</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen</p></td><td  ><p>2 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.2 / -</p></td><td  ><p>35W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD A10-9700</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Bristol Ridge</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 3.8</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-U6780A</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>LuJiaZui </p></td><td  ><p>8 / 8</p></td><td  ><p>2.7 / -</p></td><td  ><p>70W</p></td></tr></tbody></table></div><p>These results are from our 2022 test bench. We calculate the above single-threaded CPU benchmark rankings based on a geometric mean of the Cinebench, POV-Ray, and LAME CPU benchmarks. The most powerful chip gets a 100, and all others are scored relative to it. We conducted these tests in Windows 10.</p><h3 class="article-body__section" id="section-legacy-2020-2022-multi-threaded-cpu-benchmarks-rankings"><span>Legacy: 2020 - 2022 Multi-Threaded CPU Benchmarks Rankings</span></h3><div ><table><caption>Legacy: Multi-Threaded CPU Benchmarks Hierarchy 2020 - 2022 - Windows 10</caption><thead><tr><th class="firstcol " ><p> </p></th><th  ><p>Multi-Threaded App Score</p></th><th  ><p>Architecture</p></th><th  ><p>Cores/Threads</p></th><th  ><p>Base/Boost GHz</p></th><th  ><p>TDP</p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper Pro 5995WX</p></td><td  ><p>112.53%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>64 / 128</p></td><td  ><p>2.7 / 4.5</p></td><td  ><p>280W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper 3990X</p></td><td  ><p>100.0%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>64 / 128</p></td><td  ><p>2.9 / 4.3</p></td><td  ><p>280W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper Pro 3995WX</p></td><td  ><p>97.59%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>64 / 128</p></td><td  ><p>2.7 / 4.2</p></td><td  ><p>280W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper Pro 5975WX</p></td><td  ><p>93.14%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>32 / 64</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.5</p></td><td  ><p>280W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper Pro 3975WX</p></td><td  ><p>82.59%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>32 / 64</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 4.2</p></td><td  ><p>280W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper 3970X</p></td><td  ><p>75.74%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>32 / 64</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 4.5</p></td><td  ><p>280W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper 3960X</p></td><td  ><p>64.76%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>24 / 48</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 4.5</p></td><td  ><p>280W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Xeon W-3175X</p></td><td  ><p>59.95%</p></td><td  ><p>Skylake</p></td><td  ><p>28 / 56</p></td><td  ><p>3.1 / 4.3</p></td><td  ><p>225W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 9 5950X</p></td><td  ><p>53.58%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 32</p></td><td  ><p>3.4 / 4.9</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 9 3950X</p></td><td  ><p>47.32%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 32</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 4.7</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 9 5900X</p></td><td  ><p>45.89%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 24</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 4.8</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i9-10980XE</p></td><td  ><p>43.06%</p></td><td  ><p>Cascade Lake-X</p></td><td  ><p>18 / 36</p></td><td  ><p>3.0 / 4.8</p></td><td  ><p>165W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i9-9980XE</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Skylake</p></td><td  ><p>18 / 36</p></td><td  ><p>4.4 / 4.5</p></td><td  ><p>165W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper 2990WX</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen+</p></td><td  ><p>32 / 64</p></td><td  ><p>3.0 / 4.2</p></td><td  ><p>250W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 9 3900X</p></td><td  ><p>38.69%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 24</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 4.6</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT</p></td><td  ><p>38.66%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 24</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 4.7</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i9-12900K DDR4 / DDR5</p></td><td  ><p>38.39% / 38.11%</p></td><td  ><p>Alder Lake</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 24 (8P+8E)</p></td><td  ><p>3.2 / 5.2</p></td><td  ><p>125 / 241W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i9-11900K (ABT off/on)</p></td><td  ><p>36.01% / 37.07%</p></td><td  ><p>Rocket Lake</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 5.3</p></td><td  ><p>125W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper 2970WX</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen +</p></td><td  ><p>24 / 48</p></td><td  ><p>3.0 / 4.2</p></td><td  ><p>250W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i7-11700K</p></td><td  ><p>34.26%</p></td><td  ><p>Rocket Lake</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 5.0</p></td><td  ><p>125W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i9-10900K</p></td><td  ><p>33.79%</p></td><td  ><p>Comet Lake</p></td><td  ><p>10 / 20</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 5.3</p></td><td  ><p>125W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 7 5800X</p></td><td  ><p>33.48%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 4.7</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i9-10850K</p></td><td  ><p>33.38%</p></td><td  ><p>Comet Lake</p></td><td  ><p>10 / 20</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 5.2</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Threadripper 2950X</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen +</p></td><td  ><p>16 / 32</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 4.4</p></td><td  ><p>180W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 9 3900</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 24</p></td><td  ><p>3.1 / 4.3</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Ryzen 7 5700G</p></td><td  ><p>29.73%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 4.6</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i9-9900KS</p></td><td  ><p>29.11%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake-R</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>4.0 / 5.0</p></td><td  ><p>127W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i7-12700K DDR5 / DDR4</p></td><td  ><p>28.77% / 28.77%</p></td><td  ><p>Alder Lake</p></td><td  ><p>12 / 20 (8P+4E)</p></td><td  ><p>2.7 / 3.8</p></td><td  ><p>125 / 190W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT</p></td><td  ><p>28.49%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.9 / 4.7</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 7 3800X</p></td><td  ><p>28.25%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.9 / 4.5</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-10700K</p></td><td  ><p>28.17%</p></td><td  ><p>Comet Lake</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 5.1</p></td><td  ><p>125W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i9-9900K</p></td><td  ><p>27.78%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake-R</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 5.0</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 7 3700X</p></td><td  ><p>27.47%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.4</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-11600K</p></td><td  ><p>26.79%</p></td><td  ><p>Rocket Lake</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.9 / 4.9</p></td><td  ><p>125W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 5600X</p></td><td  ><p>26.15%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 4.6</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 7 4750G</p></td><td  ><p>26.06%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.4</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-10700/F</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Comet Lake</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>2.9 / 4.8</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-11400</p></td><td  ><p>24.46%</p></td><td  ><p>Rocket Lake</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>2.6 / 4.4</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 5600G</p></td><td  ><p>23.33%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.9 / 4.4</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i5-12600K DDR4 / DDR5</p></td><td  ><p>2308% / 23.07%</p></td><td  ><p>Alder Lake</p></td><td  ><p>10 / 16 (6P+4E)</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 4.9</p></td><td  ><p>125 / 150W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-9700K</p></td><td  ><p>22.81%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake-R</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 8</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.9</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT</p></td><td  ><p>22.28%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 4.5</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 3600X</p></td><td  ><p>21.76%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 4.4</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 3600</p></td><td  ><p>21.41%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.2</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 7 2700X</p></td><td  ><p>21.59%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen+</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 4.3</p></td><td  ><p>105W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-10600K</p></td><td  ><p>20.83%</p></td><td  ><p>Comet Lake</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>4.1 / 4.8</p></td><td  ><p>125W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-8700K</p></td><td  ><p>20.23%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 4.7</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i7-8700</p></td><td  ><p>20.04%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.2 / 4.6</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i7-8086K</p></td><td  ><p>19.30%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>4.0 / 5.0</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 7 1800X</p></td><td  ><p>19.17%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen</p></td><td  ><p>8 / 16</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.0</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 2600X</p></td><td  ><p>16.96%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen+</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.2</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-9600K</p></td><td  ><p>16.60%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake-R</p></td><td  ><p>6  / 6</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 4.6</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 3500X</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 6</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.1</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-7700K</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Kaby Lake</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 8</p></td><td  ><p>4.2 / 4.5</p></td><td  ><p>91W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-8600K</p></td><td  ><p>15.93%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 6</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.3</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 3 5300G</p></td><td  ><p>15.83%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 3</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 8</p></td><td  ><p>4.0 / 4.2</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 3 3300X</p></td><td  ><p>15.55%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 8</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 4.3</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.2 / 3.6</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 1600X</p></td><td  ><p>15.16%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 12</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.0</p></td><td  ><p>95W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-9400 / -9400F</p></td><td  ><p>15.04%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 6</p></td><td  ><p>2.9 / 4.1</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-8400</p></td><td  ><p>14.76%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>6 / 6</p></td><td  ><p>2.8 / 4.0</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 3 3100</p></td><td  ><p>14.17%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen 2</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 8</p></td><td  ><p>3.8 / 3.9</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Core i3-10100</p></td><td  ><p>13.37%</p></td><td  ><p>Rocket Lake</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 8</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.3</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-9350KF</p></td><td  ><p>11.76%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>4.0/4.6</p></td><td  ><p>91W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 3400G</p></td><td  ><p>11.31%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen +</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 8</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / 4.2</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-8350K</p></td><td  ><p>10.74%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>4.0 / -</p></td><td  ><p>91W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-9100</p></td><td  ><p>10.70%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake-R</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.2</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 2400G</p></td><td  ><p>10.56%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen+</p></td><td  ><p>4  / 8</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 3.9</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-8100</p></td><td  ><p>9.61%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / -</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-7400</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Kaby Lake</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4 </p></td><td  ><p>3.0 / 3.5</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 3 3200G</p></td><td  ><p>8.66%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen +</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.6 / 4.0</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 3 1300X</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 3.7</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-7100</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Kaby Lake</p></td><td  ><p>2 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.9 / -</p></td><td  ><p>51W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Ryzen 3 2200G</p></td><td  ><p>7.99%</p></td><td  ><p>Zen</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 3.7</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G5600</p></td><td  ><p>5.43%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>2 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.9 / -</p></td><td  ><p>54W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Athlon 3000G</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen+</p></td><td  ><p>2 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / -</p></td><td  ><p>35W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Athlon 220GE</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen</p></td><td  ><p>2 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.4 / -</p></td><td  ><p>35W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G5400</p></td><td  ><p>5.13%</p></td><td  ><p>Coffee Lake</p></td><td  ><p>2 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.7 / -</p></td><td  ><p>54W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD Athlon 200GE</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Zen</p></td><td  ><p>2 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.2 / -</p></td><td  ><p>35W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G4560</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Kaby Lake</p></td><td  ><p>2 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / -</p></td><td  ><p>54W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>AMD A10-9700</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>Bristol Ridge</p></td><td  ><p>4 / 4</p></td><td  ><p>3.5 / 3.8</p></td><td  ><p>65W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-U6780A</p></td><td  ><p>~</p></td><td  ><p>LuJiaZui </p></td><td  ><p>8 / 8</p></td><td  ><p>2.7 / -</p></td><td  ><p>70W</p></td></tr></tbody></table></div><p>These tests are from our 2022 test bench. The multi-threaded workload column is based on CPU benchmarks performance in Cinebench, POV-ray, vray, Blender (four tests - Koro, Barcellona, Classroom, bmw27), y-cruncher, and Handbrake x264 and x265 workloads. These CPU benchmarks represent performance in productivity-focused applications that tend to require more compute horsepower. The most powerful chip gets a 100, and all others are scored relative to it. We conducted these benchmarks in Windows 10. </p><div ><table><caption>Legacy 2023 CPU Benchmarks Hierarchy Test Setup</caption><thead><tr><th class="firstcol " ><p>Hardware</p></th><th  ></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p><strong>AMD Socket AM4 (400- 500-Series)</strong></p></td><td  ><p>AMD Ryzen 2000- 3000- 5000- series processors</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p> </p></td><td  ><p>MSI MEG X570 Godlike</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p> </p></td><td  ><p>2x 8GB Trident Z Royal DDR4-3600</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p><strong>Intel LGA 1151 (Z490)</strong></p></td><td  ><p>Intel Comet Lake processors</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p> </p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/MSI-Z370-PRO-AC-Motherboard/dp/B07SNSXHN1"></a><a href="null"></a>MSI Z370 Gaming Pro Carbon AC</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p> </p></td><td  ><p>2x 8GB Trident Z Royal DDR4-3600</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p><strong>AMD Socket AM4 (300-Series)</strong></p></td><td  ><p>Ryzen 1000-series processors</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p> </p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/MSI-X370-XPOWER-Titanium-Motherboard/dp/B06WLNZ1JH"></a><a href="null"></a>MSI X370 Xpower Gaming Titanium</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p> </p></td><td  ><p>2x 8GB G.Skill FlareX DDR4-3200 @ DDR4-2667</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p><strong>Intel LGA 1151 (Z270)</strong></p></td><td  ><p>Intel Coffee Lake, Kaby Lake processors</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p> </p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/MSI-Enthusiastic-Z270-Motherboard-GAMING/dp/B01N6O4YHD"></a><a href="null"></a>MSI Z270 Gaming M7</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p> </p></td><td  ><p>2x 8GB Trident Z Royal DDR4-3600</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p><strong>Intel LGA 2066</strong></p></td><td  ><p>Intel Skylake processors</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p> </p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/MSI-Performance-X299-Motherboard-PRO/dp/B072JWYHVX"></a><a href="null"></a>MSI X299 Gaming Pro Carbon AC</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p> </p></td><td  ><p>2x 8GB Trident Z Royal DDR4-3600</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p><strong>All</strong></p></td><td  ><p>Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3090 Eagle</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p> </p></td><td  ><p>2TB Intel DC4510 SSD</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p> </p></td><td  ><p>EVGA Supernova 1600 T2, 1600W</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p> </p></td><td  ><p>Windows 10 Pro version 2004 (build 19041.450)</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p><strong>Cooling</strong></p></td><td  ><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Radiator-Advanced-Lighting-Software-compatible/dp/B077G3C6HH"></a><a href="null"></a>Corsair H115i</p></td></tr></tbody></table></div><h3 class="article-body__section" id="section-legacy-pre-2018-desktop-cpu-benchmarks"><span>Legacy: Pre-2018 Desktop CPU Benchmarks</span></h3><p>Recognizing that a lot of older platforms are going to be paired with graphics subsystems multiple generations old, we wanted to define the top of our range to encourage balance between host processing and complementary GPUs. At this point, anyone with a Sandy Bridge-based Core i7 would realize a gain from stepping up to <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-coffee-lake-ryzen-2,5615.html">Coffee Lake</a> or <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-core-i7-7740x-kaby-lake-x-cpu,5107.html">Kaby Lake</a>, for example. And putting AMD's top FX CPUs next to a handful of Core i7s and those older Core i5s represents an upgrade to their status.</p><p>Currently, our hierarchy consists of 13 total tiers. The bottom half of the chart is largely outdated; you'll notice those CPUs dragging down performance in the latest games, whether you have one of the <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-gpus,4380.html">best graphics cards</a> or not. If you own a CPU in that range, an upgrade could really take your experience to another level.</p><p>Really, it's the top five tiers or so that remain viable. And in that top half of the chart, an upgrade is typically worthwhile if it's a least a couple of tiers higher. Otherwise, there's just not enough improvement to warrant the expense of a fresh CPU, <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-motherboards,3984.html">motherboard </a>and <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-ram,4057.html">RAM</a><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ram-random-access-memory-definition,5757.html"> </a>(not to mention the graphics card and storage solution you'd be considering as well). </p><div ><table><caption>Legacy: Pre-2018 Desktop CPU Benchmarks Hierarchy</caption><tbody><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p><strong>Intel CPUs</strong></p></td><td  ><p><strong>AMD CPUs and APUs</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-8700K </p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i9-7900X</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i9-7960X</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i9-7980XE</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-8700K</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-7740X</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-7700K</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-7820X</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-7700</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-8400</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Ryzen 7 1800X</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-7800X</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-7700T</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Ryzen 7 1700X</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-6950X</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Ryzen 7 1700</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-6900K</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 1600X</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-6850K</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 1600</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-6800K</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 1500X</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-6700K</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Ryzen 5 1400</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7 6700</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Ryzen 3 1300X</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-5960X</p></td><td  ><p>Ryzen 5 2400G</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-5930K</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-5820K</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-5775C</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel i7-4960X</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-4930K</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-4820K</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-4790K</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-4770K</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-4790</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-4771</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-4770</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-3970X</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-3960X</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-3930K</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-3820</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-3770K</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-3770</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-7640X</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-7600K</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-7600</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-7500</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-7400</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5 6600K</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-6600</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-6500</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5 6402P</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-6400</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-5675C</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-4690K</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-4670K</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-4590</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-4670</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-4570</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel BX80646I54460</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-4440</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-4430</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-3570K</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-3570</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-3550</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p><strong>Intel CPUs</strong></p></td><td  ><p><strong>AMD CPUs and APUs</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-990X Extreme</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-980X Extreme</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-975 Extreme</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-2600K</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-2600</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-965</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-3470</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-3450P</p></td><td  ><p>Intel Core i7-7700</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-3450</p></td><td  ><p>AMD FX-9370</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-3350P</p></td><td  ><p>AMD FX-8370</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-3330</p></td><td  ><p>AMD FX-8350 w/Wraith</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-2550K</p></td><td  ><p>AMD FX-8320</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-2500K</p></td><td  ><p>AMD FX-8300</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-2500</p></td><td  ><p>AMD FX-8150</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-2450P</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-2400</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-2380P</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-2320</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-2310</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-2300</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-7350K</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-7320</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-7300</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-7100</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p><strong>Intel CPUs</strong></p></td><td  ><p><strong>AMD CPUs and APUs</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-980</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-970</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-960</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-875K</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-870</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3 6320</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3 6300</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-6100</p></td><td  ><p>AMD FX-6350</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3 6100T</p></td><td  ><p>AMD FX-4350</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-6098P</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom II X6 1100T Black Edition</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-4360</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom II X6 1090T Black Edition</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-4350</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom II X4 Black Edition 980</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-4340</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom II X4 Black Edition 975</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-4170</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-4160</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-4150</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-4130</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-3250</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-3245</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-3240</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-3225</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-3220</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-3210</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-2130</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-2025</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-2120</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-2105</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-2100</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G4620</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G4600</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G4560</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G4500</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G4400</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p><strong>Intel CPUs</strong></p></td><td  ><p><strong>AMD CPUs and APUs</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD FX-8370E</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD FX-8320</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD FX-8120</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD FX-6300</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD FX-6200</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD FX-4300</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD FX-4170</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom II X6 1075T</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-950</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom II X4 970 Black Edition</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-940</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom II X4 965</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-930</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom II X4 955</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-920</p></td><td  ><p>AMD A10-7890K APU</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i7-860</p></td><td  ><p>Intel A10-7870K</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-3220T</p></td><td  ><p>AMD A10-7860K</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-2405S</p></td><td  ><p>AMD A10-7850K</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-2400S</p></td><td  ><p>AMD A10-7800</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-760</p></td><td  ><p>AMD A10-7700K</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-750</p></td><td  ><p>AMD A10-6800K</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9775</p></td><td  ><p>AMD A10-6790K</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770</p></td><td  ><p>AMD A10-6700</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650</p></td><td  ><p>AMD A10-5800K</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650</p></td><td  ><p>AMD A10-5700</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>Intel A8-7650K</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD A8-7600</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD A8-6600K</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD A8-5600K</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD A8-3870K</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD A8-3870</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD A8-3850</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon X4 880K</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>Intel Athlon X4 870K)</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>Intel A10-7870K</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon X4 750K</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon X4 740</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon X4 651K</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon X4 645</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon X4 641</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon X4 640</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p><strong>Intel CPUs</strong></p></td><td  ><p><strong>AMD CPUs and APUs</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD FX-6100</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD FX-4130</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD FX-4100</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6850</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom II X6 1055T</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6800</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom II X6 1045T</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom II X4 945</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom II X4 940</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom II X4 920</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-680</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom II X3 740</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-670</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-661</p></td><td  ><p>AMD A8-6500</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-660</p></td><td  ><p>AMD A8-5500</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-655K</p></td><td  ><p>AMD A6</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i5-650</p></td><td  ><p>AMD A6</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-2120T</p></td><td  ><p>AMD A6-3670K</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-2100T</p></td><td  ><p>AMD A6-3650</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon II X4 635</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon II X4 630</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p><strong>Intel CPUs</strong></p></td><td  ><p><strong>AMD CPUs and APUs</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Duo E8600</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Duo E8500</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom II X4 910</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Duo E8400</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom II X4 910e</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Duo E7600</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom II X4 810</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-550</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon II X4 631</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-540</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon II X4 620</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core i3-530</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon II X3 460</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G3470</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G3460</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G3450</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G3440</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G3430</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G3420</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G3260</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G3258</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G3250</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G3220</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G2130</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G2120</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G2020</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G2010</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G870</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G860</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G850</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G840</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G645</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G640</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G630</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p><strong>Intel CPUs</strong></p></td><td  ><p><strong>AMD CPUs and APUs</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Duo E8300</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom II X4 905e</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Duo E8200</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom II X4 805</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Duo E8190</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom II X3 710</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Duo E7500</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom II X3 705e</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Duo E7400</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom II X2 565 Black Edition</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Duo E6850</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom II X2 560 Black Edition</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Duo E6750</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom II X2 555 Black Edition</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G620</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom II X2 550 Black Edition</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Celeron G1630</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom II X2 545</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Celeron G1620</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom X4 9950</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Celeron G1610</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon II X3 455</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Celeron G555</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon II X3 450</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Celeron G550</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon II X3 445</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Celeron G540</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon II X3 440</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Celeron G530</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon II X3 435</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Celeron G3950</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon II X3 425</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Celeron G3930</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Celeron G3930</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Celeron G3900</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p><strong>Intel CPUs</strong></p></td><td  ><p><strong>AMD CPUs and APUs</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom X4 9850</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom X4 9750</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom X4 9650</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Duo E7300</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom X4 9600</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Duo E7200</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom X3 8850</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Duo E6700</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom X3 8750</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Duo E6550</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon II X2 370K</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Duo E6540</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon II X2 265</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium Dual-Core E6700</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon II X2 260</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium Dual-Core E6600</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon II X2 255</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium Dual-Core E650</p></td><td  ><p>AMD A6-5500K</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium Dual-Core E6300</p></td><td  ><p>AMD A6</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5800</p></td><td  ><p>AMD A4-7300</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5700</p></td><td  ><p>AMD A4-6400K</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium G9650</p></td><td  ><p>AMD A4-6300</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD A4-5400K</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD A4-5300</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD A4-4400</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD A4-4000</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD A4-3400</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD A4-3300</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD Sempron 2650</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon 64 X2 6400+</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p><strong>Intel CPUs</strong></p></td><td  ><p><strong>AMD CPUs and APUs</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom X4 9550</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom X4 9500</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom X4 9450e</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Duo E6600</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom X4 9350e</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Duo E6420</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom X3 8650</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Duo E4700</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom X3 8600</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Duo E4600</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom X3 8550</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Duo E4500</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom X3 8450e</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5400</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom X3 8450</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom X3 8400</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5200</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom X3 8250e</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium Dual-Core G620T</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon II X2 250</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon II X2 245</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon II X2 240</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon X2 7850</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon X2 7750</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p><strong>Intel CPUs</strong></p></td><td  ><p><strong>AMD CPUs and APUs</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom X4 9150e</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD Phenom X4 9100e</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Duo E6400</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon X2 7550</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Duo E6320</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon X2 7450</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Duo E4400</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon X2 5050e</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Duo E4300</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon X2 4850e/b</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Celeron E3300</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon 64 X2 5400+</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p><strong>Intel CPUs</strong></p></td><td  ><p><strong>AMD CPUs and APUs</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Duo E6300</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon X2 6550</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Core 2 Duo E5500</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon X2 6500</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2220</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon X2 4450e/b</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2200</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon X2 4600+</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2210</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon X2 4400+</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Celeron E3200</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon X2 4200+</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon X2 BE-2400</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p><strong>Intel CPUs</strong></p></td><td  ><p><strong>AMD CPUs and APUs</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2180</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Celeron 1600</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Celeron G440</p></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon X2 4050e</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ><p>AMD Athlon X2 2300 Black Edition</p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol empty" ></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p><strong>Intel CPUs</strong></p></td><td  ><p><strong>AMD CPUs and APUs</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2140</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Celeron E1500</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Celeron E1400</p></td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td class="firstcol " ><p>Intel Celeron E1200</p></td><td  ></td></tr></tbody></table></div><ul><li><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-ryzen-7-7800x3d-vs-intel-core-i9-13900k-vs-intel-core-7-13700K">AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K vs Core i7-13700K: Big Gaming Punch, Smaller Price Tag</a></li><li><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-ryzen-9-7950x3d-vs-intel-core-i9-13900k-faceoff">AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K Faceoff: Battle of the Gaming Flagships</a></li><li><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-core-i5-13600k-vs-amd-ryzen-7-7700x-and-ryzen-5-7600x-face-off">Intel Core i5-13600K vs AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and Ryzen 5 7600X Face Off</a></li><li><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-ryzen-9-7950x-vs-intel-core-i9-13900k">AMD Ryzen 9 7950X vs Intel Core i9-13900K Face Off</a></li><li><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/ryzen-7-5800x3d-vs-core-i7-12700k-and-core-i9-12900k-face-off-the-rise-of-3d-v-cache">Ryzen 7 5800X3D vs Core i7-12700K and Core i9-12900K Face-Off: The Rise of 3D V-Cache</a></li><li><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-core-i9-12900k-vs-ryzen-9-5900x-5950x">Intel Core i9-12900K vs Ryzen 9 5900X and 5950X: Alder Lake and Ryzen 5000 Face Off</a></li><li><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-core-i5-12600k-vs-amd-ryzen-5-5600x-ryzen-7-5800x-cpu-face-off">Intel Core i5-12600K vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X and 5800X Face Off: Ryzen Has Fallen</a></li><li><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-core-i7-12700k-vs-amd-ryzen-9-5900x-and-5800x-face-off-intel-rising">Intel Core i7-12700K vs AMD Ryzen 9 5900X and 5800X Face Off: Intel Rising</a></li><li><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-core-i5-12400-vs-amd-ryzen-5-5600x-ryzen-5-5600g-cpu-face-off">Intel Core i5-12400 vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Face-Off: The Gaming Value Showdown</a></li></ul><ul><li><strong>MORE: </strong><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html"><strong>Best CPUs for Gaming</strong></a></li><li><strong>MORE: </strong><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/features/amd-vs-intel-cpus"><strong>AMD vs Intel</strong></a></li><li><strong>MORE: </strong><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-13th-gen-raptor-lake-release-date-specifications-pricing-benchmarks-all-we-know-specs"><strong>13th-Gen Raptor Lake</strong></a><strong> All We Know</strong></li><li><strong>MORE: </strong><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-zen-4-ryzen-7000-release-date-specifications-pricing-benchmarks-all-we-know-specs"><strong>Zen 4 Ryzen 7000</strong></a><strong> All We Know</strong></li><li><strong>MORE: </strong><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/how-to/how-to-overclock-a-cpu"><strong>How to Overclock a CPU</strong></a></li><li><strong>MORE: </strong><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/how-to/how-to-check-cpu-temp-temperature"><strong>How to check CPU Temperature</strong></a></li><li><strong>MORE: </strong><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus"><strong>All CPUs Content</strong></a></li></ul><iframe src="https://content.jwplatform.com/players/dBMx1ASv.html" id="dBMx1ASv" title="How to Choose a CPU" width="960" height="540" frameborder="0" scrolling="auto" allowfullscreen></iframe>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ AMD Ryzen 5 2600X Deal of a Lifetime: Six Cores for $80 ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.tomshardware.com/news/cheap-cpu-amd-ryzen-5-2600x-deal</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X CPU is on sale for $80 at Micro Center stores. ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">4mcRGZz5XAhjnxZPdKaJUm</guid>
                                                                                                <enclosure url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/adCDhdohGLjE5XZqX2KjUh-1280-80.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="0"></enclosure>
                                                                        <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 14:57:26 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                <updated>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 08:41:24 +0000</updated>
                                                                                                                                            <category><![CDATA[CPUs]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[PC Components]]></category>
                                                                                                                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Zhiye Liu ]]></dc:creator>                                                                                    <dc:source><![CDATA[ https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/HhmwL5w9ggUtLCPfqGjTi4.jpg ]]></dc:source>
                                                                <dc:description><![CDATA[ &lt;p&gt;Zhiye’s love for PC hardware began when he accidentally set his Pentium P54CS PC on fire, short-circuiting his entire home. From that day on, he has constantly pursued greater hardware knowledge, which ultimately led him from being a power user to a writer at Tom’s Hardware. When Zhiye’s not covering the latest news on CPUs or GPUs, you can find him overclocking RAM to the latest trance hits.&lt;/p&gt; ]]></dc:description>
                                                                                                                                <cf:isSponsored>false</cf:isSponsored>
                <cf:hasAffiliateLinks>false</cf:hasAffiliateLinks>
                <cf:isPaid>false</cf:isPaid>
                                                                                                                                <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/adCDhdohGLjE5XZqX2KjUh-1280-80.jpg">
                                                            <media:credit><![CDATA[Micro Center]]></media:credit>
                                                                                                                                                                        <media:description><![CDATA[AMD Ryzen 5 2600X]]></media:description>                                                            <media:text><![CDATA[AMD Ryzen 5 2600X]]></media:text>
                                <media:title type="plain"><![CDATA[AMD Ryzen 5 2600X]]></media:title>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                    <media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/adCDhdohGLjE5XZqX2KjUh-1280-80.jpg" />
                                                                                                                                                                    <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <figure class="van-image-figure " data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:1000px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:100.00%;"><img id="" name="505629_741181_02_front_zoom.jpg" alt="AMD Ryzen 5 2600X" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/adCDhdohGLjE5XZqX2KjUh.jpg" mos="" align="middle" fullscreen="" width="1000" height="1000" attribution="" endorsement="" class=""></p></div></div><figcaption itemprop="caption description" class=""><span class="caption-text">AMD Ryzen 5 2600X </span><span class="credit" itemprop="copyrightHolder">(Image credit: Micro Center)</span></figcaption></figure><p>Micro Center stores around the country are looking to get rid of their remaining AMD Ryzen 5 2600X stock. For a limited three-day sale, the retailer is selling the CPU for<a href="https://www.microcenter.com/product/505629/amd-ryzen-5-2600x-36ghz-6-core-am4-boxed-processor-with-wraith-spire-cooler" target="_blank"> $79.99</a> for in-store purchases. This is a new all-time low, beating its previous lowest price of $120. If you can get to a Micro Center store (there are <a href="https://www.microcenter.com/site/stores/default.aspx" target="_blank">only 25</a> in the U.S.), you have a chance to snag one of the <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/best-tech-deals" target="_blank">best tech deals</a> ever.</p><p>Introduced in 2018, the <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-5-2600x,5579-9.html" target="_blank">Ryzen 5 2600X</a> is a second-generation Ryzen <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html" target="_blank">desktop CPU </a>that&apos;s based on AMD&apos;s Zen microarchitecture and GlobalFoundries&apos; 12nm manufacturing process. The processor is packed with with six <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/cpu-core-definition,37658.html" target="_blank">cores</a>, 12 <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-computing-thread-definition,5765.html" target="_blank">threads</a> and 16MB of L3 <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/pc-cache-definition,37649.htmlhttps://www.tomshardware.com/news/pc-cache-definition,37649.html" target="_blank">cache</a>. </p><p>The Ryzen 5 2600X arrives with a 3.6 GHz <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/clock-speed-definition,37657.html" target="_blank">base clock </a>and a respectable boost clock that tops out at 4.2 GHz. However, the Ryzen 5 2600X features an unlocked multiplier so there&apos;s headroom to squeeze even more performance out of the six-core chip. The processor fits into <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-motherboards,3984.html" target="_blank">motherboards </a>with AMD&apos;s AM4 <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-socket-definition,5758.html" target="_blank">CPU socket</a>.</p><p>As far as other features go, the Ryzen 5 2600X comes with native support for dual-channel DDR4-2933 <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-ram,4057.html" target="_blank">RAM </a>kits and offers up to 16 <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/pcie-definition,5754.html" target="_blank">PCIe 3.0</a> lanes for discrete <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-gpus,4380.html" target="_blank">graphics cards</a> and four PCIe 3.0 lanes for NVMe storage.</p><p>The Ryzen 5 2600X has a 95W TDP (thermal design power). Therefore, you don&apos;t have to spend extra on a<a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpu-coolers,4181.html" target="_blank"> CPU cooler</a> as AMD includes the Wraith Spire cooler with the processor. Still, we recommend investing in a decent aftermarket cooling solution if you plan to push the Ryzen 5 2600X to its limits.</p><iframe src="https://content.jwplatform.com/players/zYBgfFoA.html" id="zYBgfFoA" title="Buy the Right CPU" width="1920" height="1080" frameborder="0" scrolling="auto" allowfullscreen></iframe>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ Intel Core i5-9400F CPU Review: Cutting On-Die Graphics For A Slightly Lower Price ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-core-i5-9400f-cpu-integrated-graphics,6107.html</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ Intel's Core i5-9400 and -9400F CPUs, armed with with six cores and six threads, come to defend the company's gaming dominance in the mid-range market. ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">YSiww64cFGcZ9PByncb8dR</guid>
                                                                                                <enclosure url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/SoVmUbfbrWzFsuHX4BBBab-1280-80.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="0"></enclosure>
                                                                        <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 15:42:00 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                <updated>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 15:28:13 +0000</updated>
                                                                                                                                            <category><![CDATA[CPUs]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[PC Components]]></category>
                                                                                                <author><![CDATA[ palcorn@outlook.com (Paul Alcorn) ]]></author>                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Paul Alcorn ]]></dc:creator>                                                                                    <dc:source><![CDATA[ https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/RZRmFeQfPy3etHjBQitbGW.jpeg ]]></dc:source>
                                                                <dc:description><![CDATA[ &lt;p&gt;As a teenager, Paul scraped up enough money to buy a 486-powered PC with a turbo button (yes, a turbo button). Back when floppies were still popular he was already chasing after the fastest spinners for his personal computer, which led him down the long and winding storage road, covering enterprise storage. His current focus is on consumer processors, though he still keeps a close eye on the latest storage news. In his spare time, you’ll find Paul hanging out with his kids or indulging his love of the Kansas City Chiefs and Royals.&lt;/p&gt; ]]></dc:description>
                                                                                                                                <cf:isSponsored>false</cf:isSponsored>
                <cf:hasAffiliateLinks>false</cf:hasAffiliateLinks>
                <cf:isPaid>false</cf:isPaid>
                                                                                                                                <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/SoVmUbfbrWzFsuHX4BBBab-1280-80.jpg">
                                                            <media:credit><![CDATA[null]]></media:credit>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </media:content>
                                                    <media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/SoVmUbfbrWzFsuHX4BBBab-1280-80.jpg" />
                                                                                                                                                                    <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <h2 id="a-moderate-refresh">A Moderate Refresh</h2><p>Intel announced its Core i5-9400 processors in January, but the chips only recently become available in significant quantities. The company also rolled out the rest of its <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-9th-gen-desktop-cpu-coffee-lake,39138.html">Coffee Lake refresh models</a>, six months after its <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-core-i9-9900k-9th-gen-cpu,5847.html">initial salvo</a>, a delay likely attributable to its ongoing 14nm production shortage.</p><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:1510px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:48.61%;"><img id="" name="" alt="Intel Core i5-9400F Processor. Credit: Tom's Hardware" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/nRprCVJGBTixnaxFCdAgyP.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/nRprCVJGBTixnaxFCdAgyP.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="1510" height="734" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/nRprCVJGBTixnaxFCdAgyP.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div><figcaption itemprop="caption description" class="pull-"><span class="caption-text">Intel Core i5-9400F Processor. </span><span class="credit" itemprop="copyrightHolder">(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)</span></figcaption></figure><p>As Intel struggles to satisfy demand for its chips, AMD has launched its Ryzen 3000-series processors. The updated Ryzen line-up employs a smaller 7nm process that should confer power and price benefits. It&apos;ll also wield the new Zen 2 microarchitecture, which is expected to boost performance while Intel remains mired in a derivative of the seven-year-old Skylake design. These chips have now taken our <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs list by storm</a>, so be sure to head there for a list of the latest leading processors. You can also see how the chips stack up in our <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">CPU Benchmark</a> Hierarchy.</p><p>Intel&apos;s lingering lack of 14nm capacity reverberates through every facet of the industry. To boost supply, the chip-maker decided to start selling CPUs that it would have otherwise deemed defective due to nonfunctional graphics units. As a result, we now have the F-series, which includes disabled graphics hardware, but is otherwise identical to the fully-featured Core processors we&apos;re more accustomed to.</p><p>That means the Core i5-9400F is nearly identical to the Core i5-9400. Both CPUs serve to replace the impressive <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-coffee-lake-core-i5-8400-cpu,5281.html">Core i5-8400</a>, which was one of the most popular Coffee Lake models. Armed with 6C/6T and a slightly higher clock rate, the 9400s yield an incremental step forward over their predecessor.</p><p>Moreover, we&apos;re finally seeing the F-series&apos; lower price kick in. The Core i5-9400F&apos;s ~$20 discount could be compelling for mid-range gamers who don&apos;t need integrated graphics.</p><h2 id="core-i5-9400f-and-core-i5-9400">Core i5-9400F and Core i5-9400 </h2><p>From an architectural standpoint, the Core i5-9400 and -9400F are essentially the same processor as the Core i5-8400, right down to their 14nm++ process, six physical cores, support for dual-channel DDR4-2666, and 65W TDP. The CPUs also drop into an LGA 1551 interface, and they are supported by existing 300-series motherboards with up-to-date BIOSes. They're multipler-locked, unfortunately, so they include Intel's flimsy stock cooling solution.</p><div ><table><tbody><tr><td  ></td><td  ><strong>Core i5-9400F</strong></td><td  ><strong>Core i5-9400</strong></td><td  ><strong>Core i5-8400</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Architecture</strong></td><td  >Coffee Lake-R</td><td  >Coffee Lake-R</td><td  >Coffee Lake</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Socket</strong></td><td  >LGA 1151</td><td  >LGA 1151</td><td  >LGA 1151</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Cores / Threads</strong></td><td  >6 / 6</td><td  >6 / 6</td><td  >6 / 6</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Base Frequency (GHz)</strong></td><td  >2.9</td><td  >2.9</td><td  >2.8 GHz</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Boost Frequency (Active Cores - GHz)</strong></td><td  >4.1</td><td  >4.1</td><td  >4.0 GHz</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>L3 Cache</strong></td><td  >9MB</td><td  >9MB</td><td  >10.5MB</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Process</strong></td><td  >14nm++</td><td  >14nm++</td><td  >14nm++</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>TDP</strong></td><td  >65W</td><td  >65W</td><td  >65W</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Memory Speed</strong></td><td  >DDR4-2666</td><td  >DDR4-2666</td><td  >DDR4-2666</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Memory Controller</strong></td><td  >Dual-Channel</td><td  >Dual-Channel</td><td  >Dual-Channel</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>PCIe Lanes</strong></td><td  >x16 Gen3</td><td  >x16 Gen3</td><td  >x16 Gen3</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Integrated UHD Graphics GT2 (Base/Boost MHz)</strong></td><td  >350 / 1,050</td><td  >No</td><td  >350 / 1,050</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Recommended Customer Pricing</strong></td><td  >$182</td><td  >$182</td><td  >$182 - $187</td></tr></tbody></table></div><p>Again, the Core i5-9400F lacks integrated graphics, which isn't an issue for gamers who already use add-in GPUs. However, we find it interesting that Intel maintains the same $182 recommended price as its standard Core i5-9400.</p><div ><table><tbody><tr><td  ><strong>Active Cores (GHz)</strong></td><td  ><strong>Base Frequency</strong></td><td  ><strong>1</strong></td><td  ><strong>2</strong></td><td  ><strong>4</strong></td><td  ><strong>6</strong></td></tr><tr><td  >Core i5-9600K</td><td  >3.7</td><td  >4.6</td><td  >4.5</td><td  >4.4</td><td  >4.3</td></tr><tr><td  >Core i5-9400/F</td><td  >2.9</td><td  >4.1</td><td  >4.0</td><td  >4.0</td><td  >3.9</td></tr><tr><td  >Core i5-8400</td><td  >2.8</td><td  >4.0</td><td  >3.9</td><td  >3.9</td><td  >3.8</td></tr></tbody></table></div><p>Relative to the Core 5-8400, Intel boosts the -9400/-9400F's base frequency and Turbo Boost clock rate by 100 MHz, which should yield slight performance benefits. The Core i5-9400 models also include new <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-cascade-lake-xeon-platinum-8280-8268-gold-6230-amd-epyc,6058-2.html">baked-in silicon mitigations for the Meltdown vulnerability</a>, along with a combination of hardware- and software-based mitigations for the Spectre and L1TF vulnerabilities. The overhead of software-based patches applied to older processors can reach as high as 10% in certain workloads. That impact is greatly reduced on newer processors. Compared to the Core i5-8400, we didn't measure any significant speed-ups beyond what we expected. However, optimized mitigations could help deliver more of a performance uplift to enthusiasts migrating from much older platforms.  </p><p>With the launch of its Coffee Lake refresh, Intel finally switched to a solder-based thermal interface material (sTIM), improving heat transfer between its die and heat spreader. Interestingly, though, some Core i5-9400 models initially came with standard polymer-based thermal interface material (thermal grease), while others shipped with the more efficient sTIM. Intel tells us that depended on where each CPU was manufactured, though all Core i5-9400s now come with sTIM, while the locked F-series models continue to employ pTIM.</p><p>In either case, you can determine whether your CPU includes sTIM by checking its stepping. P0- and R0-stepping processors come with sTIM, while the U0 and B0 steppings utilize pTIM. Intel plans to stick with pTIM for all locked F-series models, like our U0-stepping Core i5-9400F.</p><p><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><iframe src="https://content.jwplatform.com/players/zYBgfFoA.html" id="zYBgfFoA" title="Buy the Right CPU" width="1920" height="1080" frameborder="0" scrolling="auto" allowfullscreen></iframe><h2 id="test-setup">Test Setup</h2><h2 id="meg-z390-godlike">MEG Z390 Godlike </h2><p>We're using MSI's MEG Z390 Godlike motherboard as our test platform for all Intel processors. It sells for $600, but has the power delivery subsystem to support aggressive overclocking.</p><p>MSI's motherboard imposes a 100.8 MHz base clock. We are waiting on a solution from MSI that should allow us to dial in an exact 100 MHz BCLK.</p><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:1043px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:64.53%;"><img id="" name="" alt="MSI MEG Z390 Godlike Motherboard. Credit: MSI" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/QHgc8jRuZqCvMX4fio9PVd.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/QHgc8jRuZqCvMX4fio9PVd.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="1043" height="673" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/QHgc8jRuZqCvMX4fio9PVd.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div><figcaption itemprop="caption description" class="pull-"><span class="caption-text">MSI MEG Z390 Godlike Motherboard. </span><span class="credit" itemprop="copyrightHolder">(Image credit: MSI)</span></figcaption></figure><p>The MEG Z390 Godlike sits at the top of MSI's motherboard hierarchy. It has a decked-out 18-phase power delivery subsystem that's designed to squeeze every drop of performance out of Intel's new processors. It also comes with a few nifty accessories like an M.2 PCIe riser card and an HDMI streaming card.</p><h2 id="comparison-products">Comparison Products</h2>        <div class="featured_product_block featured_block_hero" data-id="5fce4368-cbea-4893-9f00-bdfa6c6fe48f">            <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-Processor-Wraith-Cooler/dp/B07B428V2L/?tag=bom_tomshardware-20&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback" data-model-name="Ryzen 5 2600X" data-model-brand="" ><div class='product-image-widthsetter'><p class='vanilla-image-block' data-bordeaux-image-check style='padding-top:75.00%';><img style="width: 100%" class="featured_image" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/n6SEL4AuCHxdQqWBLh4Tsk.jpg" alt=""></p></div></a>            <div class="featured_product_details_wrapper">                <div class="featured_product_title_wrapper">                                                                                <div class="featured__title">AMD Ryzen 5 2600X</div>                                    </div>                <div class="subtitle__description">                                                            <p> </p>                </div>                            </div>        </div>        <div class="featured_product_block featured_block_hero" data-id="e0eec468-8ba8-4fbd-aab4-5282d4ed0e13">            <a href="http://redirect.viglink.com?key=6c0b046b3e0ec746fbbe9b03fac3f09b&u=https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819113499" data-model-name="Ryzen 7 2700X" data-model-brand="" ><div class='product-image-widthsetter'><p class='vanilla-image-block' data-bordeaux-image-check style='padding-top:83.03%';><img style="width: 100%" class="featured_image" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/c2cT8QyxBHDJ3zenoyjwN3.jpg" alt=""></p></div></a>            <div class="featured_product_details_wrapper">                <div class="featured_product_title_wrapper">                                                                                <div class="featured__title">AMD Ryzen 7 2700X</div>                                    </div>                <div class="subtitle__description">                                                            <p> </p>                </div>                            </div>        </div>        <div class="featured_product_block featured_block_hero" data-id="9483ef2f-39f3-4caf-aae8-446f0b433637">            <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Intel-i5-9600K-Desktop-Processor-Unlocked/dp/B07HHLX1R8?_encoding=UTF8&ascsubtag=tomshardware&redirect=true&tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback" data-model-name="I5-9600K" data-model-brand="" ><div class='product-image-widthsetter'><p class='vanilla-image-block' data-bordeaux-image-check style='padding-top:112.60%';><img style="width: 100%" class="featured_image" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/cj6wtDtosJVD9NYEQCxYkg.jpg" alt=""></p></div></a>            <div class="featured_product_details_wrapper">                <div class="featured_product_title_wrapper">                                                                                <div class="featured__title">Intel Core i5-9600K</div>                                    </div>                <div class="subtitle__description">                                                            <p> </p>                </div>                            </div>        </div><div ><table><tbody><tr><td  colspan="2"><strong>Test System & Configuration</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Hardware</strong></td><td  ><strong>Intel LGA 1151 (Z390)</strong>Intel Core i7-9700K, i5-9600K, i7-8700K, i5-8600K, i5-9400F, i5-8400MSI MEG Z390 Godlike2x 8GB G.Skill FlareX DDR4-3200 @ DDR4-2667 & DDR4-3466<strong>AMD Socket AM4 (400-Series)</strong>AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, Ryzen 5 2600X, Ryzen 5 2600MSI X470 Gaming M7 AC2x 8GB G.Skill FlareX DDR4-3200 @ DDR4-2933 DDR4-3466<strong>All Systems</strong>EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 FE 1TB Samsung PM863SilverStone ST1500-TI, 1500WWindows 10 Pro (All Updates)</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Cooling</strong></td><td  >Corsair H115i</td></tr></tbody></table></div><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="vrmark-3dmark-and-aots-escalation">VRMark, 3DMark and AotS: Escalation</h2><h2 id="vrmark-3dmark">VRMark, 3DMark</h2><p>We aren't big fans of using synthetic benchmarks to measure performance, but 3DMark's DX11 and DX12 CPU tests provide useful insight into the amount of horsepower available to game engines.</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/iUcM9v2inEiPeVtsaKUy6e.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/k4HyQfPdf2GKkS2FfaD5PU.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/SvDiQAsMxpQ2tCUzDLH8pL.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>The 3DMark DX11 and DX12 CPU tests tend to scale linearly based on core count, so the Core i5-9400F yields minor improvements over the similarly-equipped six-core -8400 of 2.76% and 1.69%, respectively. The less expensive six-core Ryzen 5 2600X provides far more performance in these tests, and it also sells for ~$5 more. That higher score is a byproduct of the Ryzen's extra threads. Just remember, though, multi-threaded performance doesn't always help, since game engines don't always scale as well as synthetic benchmarks.</p><p>In our experience, VRMark values per-core performance, which is a mixture of frequency and instructions per cycle (IPC) throughput. The benchmark lets you gauge your system's suitability for use with the HTC Vive or Oculus Rift, even if you don't currently own an HMD. UL defines a passing score as anything above 109 FPS. Intel's -9400F notches a small win over the -8400, but opens up an impressive lead over the stock Ryzen 5 2600X. Overclocking AMD's chip to 4.2 GHz allows it to nearly match the -9400F, though.</p><h2 id="ashes-of-the-singularity-escalation">Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation</h2><p><em>Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation</em> is a computationally intensive title that scales well with thread count.</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/XCQiEBTTYrzjXWVejHSx65.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/2r9URNKfWQ29EeH2dP8HdQ.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/t376fZHuAYNnJYmjpZfzkU.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>The Core i5-9400F takes a 1.6 FPS lead over the previous-gen -8400, but trails the Ryzen 5 2600X. Overclocking helps AMD's CPU to extend its advantage, while the Core i5-9400F languishes under its locked multiplier. </p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="dawn-of-war-iii-gta-v-hitman">Dawn of War III, GTA: V, Hitman</h2><h2 id="warhammer-40-000-dawn-of-war-iii">Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War III</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/xBMj67h2pHnkg9ydDUaJeF.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/uvyCnGKXCPR9syTSiE8MxA.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/JBjVjv8jczpYftFjtN5gaY.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>Although the <em>Warhammer 40,000 </em>benchmark responds well to multi-threading, AMD's stock Ryzen 5 2600X still falls to the bottom of our chart, while the Core i5-9400F demonstrates an incremental improvement over the -8400.</p><p>Again, overclocking proves to be the differentiator that gives the 2600X a bit of extra life.</p><h2 id="grand-theft-auto-v">Grand Theft Auto V </h2><p><em>Grand Theft Auto V</em><span> </span>favors Intel architectures and, more generally, multi-core designs with high clock rates.</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/AyTShDojfMg3rPKDETwDE.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/srwps7ozrUHA7ooSmEoCpg.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/5dMGF9bTG6aL2wTj7dkW64.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>The Core i5-9400F establishes a tangible lead over AMD's Ryzen processors, including the tuned Ryzen 7 2700X. Again, we see the -9400F's slight improvement over Intel's previous-gen -8400. </p><h2 id="hitman">Hitman </h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/sge6RnVRzYyVPLaM538YxY.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/U2wHjq7N32sxgfhvSykAPA.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/RwajF54iLE5gBs9iV5gQD9.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>The Core i5-9400F tops AMD's Ryzen-based competition while tying its counterpart.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="shadow-of-war-and-project-cars-2">Shadow Of War and Project CARS 2</h2><h2 id="middle-earth-shadow-of-war">Middle-earth: Shadow Of War</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/HWKxt63tUN77NLRB3ZvepN.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/kVRvnsGK3mCo4yN5xHBUnh.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/UKdq59Fsg6THxSJ4CRqf2F.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p><em>Shadow of War</em> leans heavier on graphics resources than host processing, so we don't see much difference between the fastest and slowest CPUs. The Core i5-9400F averages 0.9 FPS less than the -8400. However, that isn't too surprising given the relatively slim difference between models. We test at 1920 x 1080, and at a high-enough resolution, most games are indeed limited by your GPU. Plan accordingly if you're running into a bottleneck.</p><h2 id="project-cars-2">Project CARS 2</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/f2kSRCgLZLB5rpwgPVMXfZ.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/nejpZpaymebyyS77ePG3Pn.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/5tMsB8q4N5CnU2QEnBFwQb.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>Although <em>Project CARS 2</em> is purportedly optimized for threading, clock rates have the greatest effect on this title's frame rates. The -9400F trails the -8400, but both processors are significantly faster than AMD's Ryzen models.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="office-and-productivity">Office and Productivity</h2><h2 id="adobe-creative-cloud">Adobe Creative Cloud</h2><p>Even though this suite has a few parallelized workloads, its final score is heavily influenced by the lightly-threaded tasks common in most desktop applications.</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/EimQWHFdRKQM68dgdh7ga6.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/HcVK8vh9piucxdXL7MWuf3.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/Mqo9XhTQcVLcfc5PaYrQJJ.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/QR4zrLBme3XbAuGrubES4c.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/EeMwAdTdXkWNS3bVtEoMzj.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>Although Intel processors tend to excel in lightly-threaded tasks, AMD's Ryzen 5 2600X carves out wins in both the single- and multi-threaded applications. Overclocking the Ryzen models yields nice performance improvements, too.</p><h2 id="web-browser">Web Browser</h2><p>The Krakken suite evaluates JavaScript performance using audio, imaging, and cryptography workloads. Like most browser-based benchmarks, single-threaded performance reigns supreme.</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/GjC5gefA5rSpx2PqcM93QT.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/cKHR9QxkKZTSe3oYmQt8hj.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/i7KMYsFgPE9rx9sGckkusn.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>The Ryzen 5 2600X proves to be pretty nimble in the Krakken JavaScript performance test, which often relies heavily on per-core performance. Meanwhile, Intel's Core i5s lead in the MotionMark and WebXPRT tests.</p><h2 id="productivity">Productivity</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/SxQq2wmcwSmaTnpamPGt7B.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/wNyAYcsr23np7PZJUwkWZZ.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/rGSVkZtHXh6QTaqaMndtkZ.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/Auz3oGAv7LqA552SWPFimK.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/FMxHak6GvNX57AqYhRCfXL.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>The application start-up metric measures load time snappiness in word processors, GIMP, and Web browsers under warm- and cold-start conditions. Other platform-level considerations affect this test as well, including the storage subsystem. Single-core performance largely determines responsiveness. Core i5-9400F trails the previous-gen -8400 by a number small enough that it falls within our expected margin of error.</p><p>Our video conferencing suite measures performance in single- and multi-user applications that utilize the Windows Media Foundation for playback and encoding. It also performs facial detection to model real-world usage. This workload responds well based on the number of cores and threads, so AMD's Ryzen fares well. Again, we see the Core i5-9400F offering such similar performance to its counterpart that it falls within this test's margin of error.</p><p>The photo editing benchmark measures performance with Futuremark's binaries using the ImageMagick library. Common photo processing workloads also tend to be parallelized, giving Ryzen 5 models an easy lead over the Core i5-9400F and -8400. The Ryzen 5 2600X also benefits greatly from overclocking.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="rendering-encoding-and-compression">Rendering, Encoding and Compression</h2><h2 id="rendering">Rendering</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/mdAPGiyF9UNh7AZzMM8D77.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/JP4H3PGEDXBxtWLn3DfLen.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/4yzbxniFAKmwm4cDLirRoT.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/58tPmdQvPg4nzdyJ5FqjaZ.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ZUejekzFAb6eBXtHMxdCx7.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/AugPvuHdgAQtAZdsqLXGNG.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/8dbUaxM5FrS5ooDYztduub.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ukkBfuaXQFWRaNRgroiJx7.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/AjWrHfJRXv5YDansgR2rcY.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>By and large, the Ryzen processors are better-suited for heavy rendering workloads due to their higher core counts and simultaneous multi-threading capabilities. They dominate our threaded tests, as a result.</p><p>Single-threaded workloads, regardless of their genre, are still best addressed with Intel CPUs. The Core i5-9400F demonstrates small improvements over its predecessor, but basically offers the bare minimum to count as an upgrade. We certainly wouldn't recommend this chip as an upgrade.</p><h2 id="encoding-and-compression">Encoding and Compression</h2><p>Our threaded compression and decompression metrics work directly from system memory, removing storage throughput from the equation.</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/xdNdumLq6QZwaJgyABpQ2R.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/3BTKnNR5otSqVqiRwoVhbR.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/rX8AMvGRMeprTQzyPgStpG.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/9yaqowLYGHJTN466oF7GJe.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/aKMoCEGqQv3yC6hcjv3fhN.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/67hcEhtcCEQGzComErxvnm.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/xyd4fzuCKj5XnEdCJgT2HN.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>Like its predecessor, the Core i5-9400F falls to the bottom of our chart. This is due to a combination of relatively tame frequencies and six physical cores. In comparison, the Ryzen 5 2600X offers a tremendous amount of performance at its price point. </p><p>y-cruncher, a single- and multi-threaded program that computes pi, is a great benchmark for measuring the effect of AVX instructions. As per usual, Intel's architectures chew through these taxing workloads with ease. The Core i5 models even beat AMD's 8C/16T Ryzen 7 2700 in a testament to the effectiveness of Intel's AVX implementation. </p><p>The Core i5-9400F beats AMD's Ryzen 5 processors during the HandBrake x265 test, which is heavily optimized for AVX instructions. The x264 benchmark, which has a lighter distribution of AVX instructions, finds the Ryzen 5 2600X better able to leverage the advantage of its extra threads (not to mention its overclocking headroom). </p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="conclusion">Conclusion</h2><p>Intel’s Core i5-9400 processors represent another iterative update to the Skylake architecture, yielding minor performance improvements in certain workloads. But the company's tendency to over-segment its product families, resulting in the removal of Hyper-Threading from Core i5s and a lack of overclocking, diminishes its position against a lot of AMD's Ryzen CPUs. There is now a vulnerable spot in the middle of Intel's stack that AMD will almost certainly attempt to exploit with its Ryzen 3000 series.</p><p>At least Intel has a somewhat budget-oriented offering in the form of its F-series processors, which lack integrated graphics. Although the F-series chips officially sport the same recommended prices as Intel's fully-functional models, they're a little cheaper in practice. Saving $20 on the -9400F is a big deal when it means fending off AMD’s Ryzen 5 family armed with more threads, unlocked multipliers, and beefy stock coolers.</p><p>In the chart below, we plot gaming performance with both average frame rates and a geometric mean of the 99<sup>th</sup> percentile frame times (a good indicator of smoothness), and also plot performance vs. price in a range of productivity applications. It's worth noting that AMD's line-up is heavily discounted, while Intel's Core i5-9400F sells at a significantly lower price than the company's recommendation. As such, we’re departing from our standard practice of using official price lists. Instead, we’re using average pricing found online (temporary sales excluded). Volatility applies.</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/TwXGXTJVrQ6aq7pzM5j9nd.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/UoJ3jFDsgjbkwgGvjqJjr8.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/vAH9Tta22FwbhdM9Q6CkaN.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/FTp9PoENWFg7CKabt6p26P.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/mm4sxcQnZhaHVNiux7pSSc.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/N5LyZBksbayj6fHUFcPr4Z.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ipbxVYwco5wqz9v8QtRMrj.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/pqfKAsh2yxfQW2suYCGVtP.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/vTbD5dK2Nd2EwpsudPHPQF.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/arUWfnqR9EmCpV2qny8BSQ.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>The Core i5-9400F’s 2.5%-higher clock rate offers an incredibly mundane advance over the previous-gen Core i5-8400 in games, with differences across our test suite amounting to roughly 1 FPS in both average frame rates and 99<sup>th</sup> percentile measurements. That certainly isn’t enough to warrant a generational upgrade.</p><p>Intel's real competition comes from the Ryzen 5 2600X. AMD’s 6C/12T processor retails for ~$5 more than the -9400F, but trails by 4.2 FPS (4.8%) on average. The 2600X’s unlocked multiplier is a big advantage though, and its bundled thermal solution is robust enough for overclocking. After tuning, the Ryzen overtakes Intel's Core i5-9400F, if only slightly.</p><p>Our application testing revealed a similar trend, with the -9400F serving up small boosts compared to the -8400, yet leaving room for AMD's Ryzen 5 2600X to shine even brighter. Not surprisingly, 12 threads help chew through rendering, compression, decompression, and encoding workloads. Strong threading performance also bodes well for simultaneous gaming/streaming performance.</p><p>You can drop the AMD processors into budget-minded B-series motherboards with memory overclocking support. Conversely, you have to buy a Z-series board from Intel to enable similar functionality. Given the pricing of Z-series motherboards, they simply don't make much sense alongside multiple-locked mainstream CPUs. Forward compatibility, on the other hand, is something worth thinking about, and AMD’s pledge to support Socket AM4 socket with its new Ryzen 3000 processors looms large. Picking up a Ryzen model today leaves an upgrade path open, while Intel will almost certainly move on to a new interface next generation. </p><p>Aside from the -9400F’s lack of integrated graphics (which the Ryzen 5 2600X doesn’t have either), Intel's newest Core i5 still offers leading gaming performance in its price range. A $20 savings is a nice addition that helps Intel stay competitive with AMD. In spite of the -9400F’s discount, though, the Ryzen 5 2600X still gives you the best blend of pricing and performance for general productivity applications. It's quite adept at gaming workloads too, making it an excellent all-rounder. Plus, AMD’s new chips are on the horizon.</p><p><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ Intel Core i5-9600K Review: A Mid-Range Gamer's CPU ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-core-i5-9600k-coffee-lake-cpu,5922.html</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ Intel's Core i5-9600K looks to upset the Ryzen 5 2600X as the value chip for the mainstream. ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">CeGk8F7twKx5dxjocSUanW</guid>
                                                                                                <enclosure url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/DhaAFvPvoRR2Tk4kMjYi4H-1280-80.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="0"></enclosure>
                                                                        <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 15:41:00 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                <updated>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 15:27:43 +0000</updated>
                                                                                                                                            <category><![CDATA[CPUs]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[PC Components]]></category>
                                                                                                <author><![CDATA[ palcorn@outlook.com (Paul Alcorn) ]]></author>                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Paul Alcorn ]]></dc:creator>                                                                                    <dc:source><![CDATA[ https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/RZRmFeQfPy3etHjBQitbGW.jpeg ]]></dc:source>
                                                                <dc:description><![CDATA[ &lt;p&gt;As a teenager, Paul scraped up enough money to buy a 486-powered PC with a turbo button (yes, a turbo button). Back when floppies were still popular he was already chasing after the fastest spinners for his personal computer, which led him down the long and winding storage road, covering enterprise storage. His current focus is on consumer processors, though he still keeps a close eye on the latest storage news. In his spare time, you’ll find Paul hanging out with his kids or indulging his love of the Kansas City Chiefs and Royals.&lt;/p&gt; ]]></dc:description>
                                                                                                                                <cf:isSponsored>false</cf:isSponsored>
                <cf:hasAffiliateLinks>false</cf:hasAffiliateLinks>
                <cf:isPaid>false</cf:isPaid>
                                                                                                                                <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/DhaAFvPvoRR2Tk4kMjYi4H-1280-80.jpg">
                                                            <media:credit><![CDATA[null]]></media:credit>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </media:content>
                                                    <media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/DhaAFvPvoRR2Tk4kMjYi4H-1280-80.jpg" />
                                                                                                                                                                    <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <h2 id="the-core-i5-doldrums">The Core i5 Doldrums</h2><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:651px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:112.60%;"><img id="" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/cj6wtDtosJVD9NYEQCxYkg.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/cj6wtDtosJVD9NYEQCxYkg.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="651" height="733" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/cj6wtDtosJVD9NYEQCxYkg.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><p>It used to be that Core i5 processors represented the <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">best choice</a> for mainstream users looking for value-oriented pricing, high performance, and modest power consumption. But now, fast Ryzen 5 CPUs often prove superior. Intel did increase the core count of its Coffee Lake-based Core i5s by 50 percent to grapple with AMD&apos;s first-gen Ryzen 5 chips. However, the latest round of Ryzen 5 models is even faster, particularly in threaded workloads, as you can see in our <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">CPU Benchmark</a> Hierarchy.</p><p>Intel&apos;s ninth-gen Core i7 and Core i9 processors come with more cores, too. Unfortunately, the Core i5-9600K we&apos;re reviewing today does not. It includes the same six cores as its predecessor, along with a price tag that lands between Ryzen 5 2600X and Ryzen 7 2700. Worse, both competing CPUs are bundled with coolers, while Intel makes you buy your own.</p><p>The story isn&apos;t all bad for Intel. It did switch to a solder-based thermal interface material between its die and heat spreader, enabling higher multi-core Turbo Boost frequencies. But those incremental improvements are hardly earth-shattering.</p><p>Choosing between a Core i5-9600K and Ryzen presents the same conundrum we&apos;ve faced in the past: it depends on the type of software you run most frequently. If you&apos;re a gamer who doesn&apos;t really venture beyond 1920x1080, Intel&apos;s Core i5-9600K is the chip for you. But if a majority of your workloads are threaded in nature, including content creation and productivity, a powerful Ryzen gets you more performance at a competitive price.</p><p>AMD has also launched its Ryzen 3000-series processors. The updated Ryzen line-up employs a smaller 7nm process that should confer power and price benefits. It&apos;ll also wield the new Zen 2 microarchitecture, which is expected to boost performance while Intel remains mired in a derivative of the seven-year-old Skylake design. These chips have now taken our <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs list by storm</a>, so be sure to head there for a list of the latest leading processors.</p><iframe src="https://content.jwplatform.com/players/zYBgfFoA.html" id="zYBgfFoA" title="Buy the Right CPU" width="1920" height="1080" frameborder="0" scrolling="auto" allowfullscreen></iframe><h2 id="intel-core-i5-9600k">Intel Core i5-9600K</h2><p>The ~$263 Core i5-9600K lands between the $299 Ryzen 7 2700 and $225 Ryzen 5 2600X. Inexplicably, Intel raised the -9600K's price by $5 compared to its previous-gen Core i5-8600K.</p><div ><table><tbody><tr><td  ></td><td  ><strong>Core i9-9900K</strong></td><td  ><strong>Core i7-9700K</strong></td><td  ><strong>Core i5-9600K</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Architecture</strong></td><td  >Coffee Lake</td><td  >Coffee Lake</td><td  ><strong>Coffee Lake</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Socket</strong></td><td  >1151</td><td  >1151</td><td  ><strong>1151</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Cores / Threads</strong></td><td  >8 / 16</td><td  >8 / 8</td><td  ><strong>6 / 6</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Base Frequency (GHz)</strong></td><td  >3.6</td><td  >3.6</td><td  ><strong>3.7</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Boost Frequency ( Active Cores - GHz)</strong></td><td  >1-2 Cores - 5.0, 4 Cores - 4.8, 8 Cores - 4.7</td><td  >1 Core - 4.9, 2 Core 4.8, 4 Core 4.7, 8 Core 4.6</td><td  ><strong>1 Core - 4.6, 2 Core - 4.5, 4 Core 4.4, 6 Core 4.3</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>L3 Cache</strong></td><td  >16MB</td><td  >12MB</td><td  ><strong>9MB</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Process</strong></td><td  >14nm++</td><td  >14nm++</td><td  ><strong>14nm++</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>TDP</strong></td><td  >95W</td><td  >95W</td><td  ><strong>95W</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Memory Speed</strong></td><td  >DDR4-2666</td><td  >DDR4-2666</td><td  ><strong>DDR4-2666</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Memory Controller</strong></td><td  >Dual-Channel</td><td  >Dual-Channel</td><td  ><strong>Dual-Channel</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>PCIe Lanes</strong></td><td  >x16</td><td  >x16</td><td  ><strong>x16</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Integrated UHD Graphics GT2 (Base/Boost MHz)</strong></td><td  >350 / 1200</td><td  >350 / 1200</td><td  ><strong>350 / 1150</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Recommended Customer Pricing</strong></td><td  >$488 - $499</td><td  >$374 - $385</td><td  ><strong>$262 - $263</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div><p>Intel manufactures the -9600K on its 14nm++ process. In addition to six execution cores (without Hyper-Threading technology), the chip includes an integrated UHD 630 graphics engine, sports unlocked ratio multipliers for easy overclocking, and supports two channels of DDR4-2666 memory. Like the Core i5-8600K that preceded it, the -9600K comes equipped with 9MB of L3 cache and a 95W thermal design power rating.</p><div ><table><tbody><tr><td  >Active Cores</td><td  >Base</td><td  >1 Core</td><td  >2 Cores</td><td  >3 Cores</td><td  >4 Cores</td><td  >5 Cores</td><td  >6 Cores</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Core i5-9600K (GHz)</strong></td><td  ><strong>3.7</strong></td><td  ><strong>4.6</strong></td><td  ><strong>4.5</strong></td><td  ><strong>4.4</strong></td><td  ><strong>4.4</strong></td><td  ><strong>4.3</strong></td><td  ><strong>4.3</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Core i5-8600K (GHz)</strong></td><td  ><strong>3.6</strong></td><td  ><strong>4.3</strong></td><td  ><strong>4.2</strong></td><td  ><strong>4.2</strong></td><td  ><strong>4.2</strong></td><td  ><strong>4.1</strong></td><td  ><strong>4.1</strong></td></tr></tbody></table></div><p>Intel does dial up the -9600K's Turbo Boost frequencies quite a bit, though. Solder-based thermal interface material improves heat transfer, facilitating higher frequencies whether you're using one core or all six. A base clock rate of 3.7 GHz already represents a 100 MHz improvement over the Core i5-8600K frequency floor, and you get as much as a 300 MHz speed-up when multiple cores are utilized.</p><p>We didn't see the need for extreme cooling with Intel's Core i5-9600K, even during our overclocking efforts. The processor held a steady 80°C under five hours of Prime95 optimized for AVX instructions, and ~64°C during a series of non-AVX tasks. Granted, we did use a beefy Corsair H115i cranking away at full speed. But you shouldn't have any trouble cooling the processor at stock settings. Overclocking is fine with a capable closed-loop liquid cooler.</p><div ><table><tbody><tr><td  ><strong>Model</strong></td><td  ><strong>Cores / Threads</strong></td><td  ><strong>Base Frequency</strong></td><td  ><strong>Boost Frequency</strong></td><td  ><strong>Memory Support</strong></td><td  ><strong>PCIe Lanes</strong></td><td  ><strong>Cache</strong></td><td  ><strong>TDP</strong></td><td  ><strong>Price</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Core i9-9900K</strong></td><td  ><strong>8 / 16</strong></td><td  ><strong>3.6 GHz</strong></td><td  ><strong>5 GHz (1 / 2 Core)4.8 GHz (4 Core)4.7 GHz (6 / 8 Core)</strong></td><td  ><strong>DDR4-2666</strong></td><td  ><strong>16</strong></td><td  ><strong>16MB</strong></td><td  ><strong>95W</strong></td><td  ><strong>$488</strong></td></tr><tr><td  >Ryzen 7 2700X</td><td  >8 / 16</td><td  >3.7 GHz</td><td  >4.3 GHz</td><td  >DDR4-2966</td><td  >16 + 4 (NVMe)</td><td  >16MB</td><td  >105W</td><td  >$329</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Core i7-9700K</strong></td><td  ><strong>8 / 8</strong></td><td  ><strong>3.6 GHz</strong></td><td  ><strong>4.9 GHz (1 Core)4.8 GHz (2 Core)4.7 GHz (4 Core)4.6 GHz (6 / 8 Core)</strong></td><td  ><strong>DDR4-2666</strong></td><td  ><strong>16</strong></td><td  ><strong>12MB</strong></td><td  ><strong>95W</strong></td><td  ><strong>$374</strong></td></tr><tr><td  >Core i7-8086K</td><td  >6 / 12</td><td  >4.0 GHz</td><td  >5.0 GHz</td><td  >DDR4-2666</td><td  >16</td><td  >12MB</td><td  >95W</td><td  >$425</td></tr><tr><td  >Core i7-8700K</td><td  >6 / 12</td><td  >3.7 GHz</td><td  >4.7 GHz</td><td  >DDR4-2666</td><td  >16</td><td  >12MB</td><td  >95W</td><td  >$330</td></tr><tr><td  >Ryzen 7 2700</td><td  >8 / 16</td><td  >3.2 GHz</td><td  >4.1 GHz</td><td  >DDR4-2966</td><td  >16 + 4 (NVMe)</td><td  >16MB</td><td  >95W</td><td  >$299</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Core i5-9600K</strong></td><td  ><strong>6 / 6</strong></td><td  ><strong>3.7 GHz</strong></td><td  ><strong>4.6 GHz (1 Core)4.5 GHz (2 Core)4.4 GHz (4 Core)4.3 GHz (6 Core)</strong></td><td  ><strong>DDR4-2666</strong></td><td  ><strong>16</strong></td><td  ><strong>9MB</strong></td><td  ><strong>95W</strong></td><td  ><strong>$262</strong></td></tr><tr><td  >Core i5-8600K</td><td  >6 / 6</td><td  >3.6 GHz</td><td  >4.3 GHz</td><td  >DDR4-2666</td><td  >16</td><td  >9MB</td><td  >95W</td><td  >$279</td></tr><tr><td  >Ryzen 5 2600X</td><td  >6 / 12</td><td  >3.6 GHz</td><td  >4.2 GHz</td><td  >DDR4-2966</td><td  >16 + 4 (NVMe)</td><td  >16MB</td><td  >65W</td><td  >$225</td></tr><tr><td  >Ryzen 5 2600</td><td  >6 / 12</td><td  >3.4 GHz</td><td  >3.9 GHz</td><td  >DDR4-2966</td><td  >16 + 4 (NVMe)</td><td  >16MB</td><td  >65W</td><td  >$199</td></tr></tbody></table></div><p>The Core i5-9600K drops into existing 300-series motherboards after a BIOS update. Most, if not all of them, should support Core i5-9600K and its power requirements quite easily, though you might want to steer away from the lowest-cost models if you plan on overclocking.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="overclocking-power-and-test-setup">Overclocking, Power, and Test Setup</h2><h2 id="power-consumption">Power Consumption</h2><p>Measuring the power consumption of modern CPUs can get tricky. But as long as your 12V supply (EPS) readings, motherboard power supply sensor values, and voltage transformer losses plausibly coincide, everything should be fine. Therefore, we're reporting pure package power to avoid possible influences from our motherboard. Results from the PWM controller are very reliable if you take them as averages over a few minutes.</p><p>We conducted this round of testing in our U.S. lab, and our results are not directly comparable with numbers from the German lab used in previous reviews.</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/EvKBUBpxLrbPXng7kGKs9G.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/UCUiV9APMrg35ZP3hquhgi.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>As expected, the Core i5-9600K exceeded its 95W TDP at stock settings. Remember, though: that figure only applies to the base frequency, and it doesn't reflect power consumption during Turbo Boost activity.</p><p>Regardless, the stock -9600K's 119W (under the influence of AVX-optimized code) and 62W (in a non-AVX workload) measurements didn't raise any alarms. We saw a peak of 179W during an AVX-optimized workload with the processor operating at 5 GHz, but that was about what we expected from it. </p><h2 id="overclocking">Overclocking</h2><p>We tapped Corsair's H115i v2 to test our Core i5-9600K, which gave us enough headroom to run at 5 GHz with 1.36V Vcore and Auto Load Line Calibration settings. An AVX offset wasn't needed; our sample maintained ~80°C during AVX workloads. The temperature only reached ~64°C during non-AVX workloads.</p><p>Although some Core i5-9600K CPUs reportedly run stable at up to 5.2 GHz, we aren't comfortable pushing our chip beyond the "safe" 1.35V limit.</p><h2 id="meg-z390-godlike-2">MEG Z390 Godlike</h2><p>We're using MSI's MEG Z390 Godlike as our test platform for all Intel processors. This pricey board sells for $600, but has the power delivery subsystem to support aggressive overclocking.</p><p>MSI's motherboard imposes a 100.8 MHz base clock. Its extra 0.8 MHz serves to push overclocks even harder, though our motherboard review team would probably call it cheating. Consequently, our 5.1 GHz overclock is actually 5.14 GHz. Stock frequencies aren't spared, and there is no way to adjust the BCLK down to remove MSI's self-awarded advantage. Meanwhile, we are waiting on a solution from MSI that should allow us to dial in an exact 100 MHz BCLK.</p><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:1043px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:64.53%;"><img id="" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/QHgc8jRuZqCvMX4fio9PVd.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/QHgc8jRuZqCvMX4fio9PVd.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="1043" height="673" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/QHgc8jRuZqCvMX4fio9PVd.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><p>The MSI MEG Z390 Godlike sits at the top of MSI's motherboard hierarchy. It has a decked-out 18-phase power delivery subsystem that's designed to squeeze every drop of performance out of Intel's new processors. It also comes with a few nifty accessories like an M.2 PCIe riser card and an HDMI streaming card.</p><h2 id="comparison-products-2">Comparison Products</h2>        <div class="featured_product_block featured_block_hero" data-id="be1e26c0-a04d-451a-9749-c7a9aa3e5219">            <a href="http://redirect.viglink.com?key=6c0b046b3e0ec746fbbe9b03fac3f09b&u=https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819113499" data-model-name="Ryzen 7 2700X" data-model-brand="" ><div class='product-image-widthsetter'><p class='vanilla-image-block' data-bordeaux-image-check style='padding-top:83.03%';><img style="width: 100%" class="featured_image" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/c2cT8QyxBHDJ3zenoyjwN3.jpg" alt=""></p></div></a>            <div class="featured_product_details_wrapper">                <div class="featured_product_title_wrapper">                                                                                <div class="featured__title">AMD Ryzen 7 2700X</div>                                    </div>                <div class="subtitle__description">                                                            <p> </p>                </div>                            </div>        </div>        <div class="featured_product_block featured_block_hero" data-id="654c88f1-79ad-404b-88bb-639ad8a2cead">            <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/https://www.amazon.com/Intel-BX80684I78700K-Core-i7-8700K-Processor/dp/B07598VZR8/?tag=bom_tomshardware-20&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback" data-model-name="Core i7-8700K" data-model-brand="" ><div class='product-image-widthsetter'><p class='vanilla-image-block' data-bordeaux-image-check style='padding-top:122.29%';><img style="width: 100%" class="featured_image" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/j7KjsgaP5iuRZ7RRqGYQTc.jpg" alt=""></p></div></a>            <div class="featured_product_details_wrapper">                <div class="featured_product_title_wrapper">                                                                                <div class="featured__title">Intel Core i7-8700K</div>                                    </div>                <div class="subtitle__description">                                                            <p> </p>                </div>                            </div>        </div>        <div class="featured_product_block featured_block_hero" data-id="69a031f8-7940-4bff-a54a-e002b17e07a6">            <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-Processor-Wraith-Cooler/dp/B07B428V2L/?tag=bom_tomshardware-20&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback" data-model-name="Ryzen 5 2600X" data-model-brand="" ><div class='product-image-widthsetter'><p class='vanilla-image-block' data-bordeaux-image-check style='padding-top:75.00%';><img style="width: 100%" class="featured_image" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/n6SEL4AuCHxdQqWBLh4Tsk.jpg" alt=""></p></div></a>            <div class="featured_product_details_wrapper">                <div class="featured_product_title_wrapper">                                                                                <div class="featured__title">AMD Ryzen 5 2600X</div>                                    </div>                <div class="subtitle__description">                                                            <p> </p>                </div>                            </div>        </div><div ><table><tbody><tr><td  colspan="2"><strong>Test System & Configuration</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Hardware</strong></td><td  ><strong>Intel LGA 1151 (Z390)</strong>Intel Core i9-9900K, i7-9700K, i5-9600K, i7-8700K, i5-8600K, i5-8400MSI MEG Z390 Godlike2x 8GB G.Skill FlareX DDR4-3200 @ DDR4-2667 & DDR4-3466<strong>Intel LGA 2066</strong>Intel Core i9-7820XMSI X299 Gaming Pro Carbon AC4x 8GB G.Skill FlareX DDR4-3200 @ DDR4-2666, DDR4-3200<strong>AMD Socket AM4 (400-Series)</strong>AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, Ryzen 5 2600XMSI X470 Gaming M7 AC2x 8GB G.Skill FlareX DDR4-3200 @ DDR4-2933<strong>All Systems</strong>EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 FE 1TB Samsung PM863SilverStone ST1500-TI, 1500WWindows 10 Pro (All Updates)</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Cooling</strong></td><td  >Corsair H115i</td></tr></tbody></table></div><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="vrmark-3dmark-and-aots-escalation-2">VRMark, 3DMark and AotS: Escalation</h2><h2 id="vrmark-3dmark-2">VRMark, 3DMark</h2><p>We aren't big fans of using synthetic benchmarks to measure performance, but 3DMark's DX11 and DX12 CPU tests provide useful insight into the amount of horsepower available to game engines.</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/zTsdY2dzk8ZcBpMpxnoRk4.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/hF769DJmitjcsoPeCQvqpW.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/EHxXEUAyo46ut86LiaGX4S.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>The Core i5-9600K suffers due to its six threads. That's half of what the Ryzen 5 2600X offers to our DX11 test. AMD's stock chip beats the overclocked -9600K, then adds insult to injury with a bit of tuning. Notice that the stock -9600K demonstrates a decent boost compared to Intel's -8600K. Then, after overclocking, they end up faring similarly.</p><p>In the DX12 test, Intel's Core i5-9600K provides a slight improvement over the -8600K. Ryzen 5 2600X leads the stock -9600K, though overclocking helps extract the advantages of Intel's generally higher per-core performance.</p><p>VRMark lets you gauge your system's suitability for use with the HTC Vive or Oculus Rift, even if you don't currently own an HMD. UL defines a passing score as anything above 109 FPS. The -9600K easily beats its Ryzen competition in this lightly-threaded benchmark. </p><h2 id="ashes-of-the-singularity-escalation-2">Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation</h2><p><em>Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation</em> is a computationally intensive title that scales well with thread count.</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/aYYQKnk2gUQHC5LnJzeRQA.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/bZwRk5tu3FJPXn2CRVFMoT.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/7uLPJvYHWeigeytMH9vmZX.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>The Core i5-9600K enables a few more frames per second than the -8600K, but surprisingly trails after tuning. A handful of frame time outliers obviously affected the overclocked configuration's performance.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="civilization-vi-graphics-and-ai-dawn-of-war-iii">Civilization VI Graphics and AI, Dawn of War III</h2><h2 id="civilization-vi-ai-test">Civilization VI AI Test</h2><p><em>Civilization VI</em>'s AI test measures CPU performance in a turn-based strategy game and tends to favor per-core performance.</p><h2 id=""></h2><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:1112px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:74.91%;"><img id="" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/P2oL68ZpX7VkgHmGheWot.png" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/P2oL68ZpX7VkgHmGheWot.png" align="" fullscreen="1" width="1112" height="833" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/P2oL68ZpX7VkgHmGheWot.png' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><p>The Ryzen processors trail due to their lower per-core performance, which is dependent on instruction-per-clock (IPC) throughput and frequency.</p><h2 id="civilization-vi-graphics-test">Civilization VI Graphics Test</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/hs4SyRivfoSuR2TNfY4veK.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ae2ooeeUcUGHpAB2AarGEH.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/d7yuAacVkreSUGFHvzjzjQ.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>The Core i5-9600K carves out a respectable lead in this test, which typically favors physical cores over simultaneous multi-threading.</p><h2 id="warhammer-40-000-dawn-of-war-iii-2">Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War III</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/V2tZrcRqrQMiWYykvydN9k.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/QejXgYXTWZUbpAtwsUZBgU.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/TKcZNbS4QvF44ZNVKxXj5D.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>Although the <em>Warhammer 40,000 </em>benchmark responds well to threading, AMD's Ryzen 5 2600X still falls to the bottom of our chart.</p><p>Because we can only include so many CPUs in our current chart template, we're substituting in a Ryzen 7 2700X for the Ryzen 7 2700. The overclocked Ryzen 7 2700X provides roughly the same performance as a tuned 2700, and it's obvious that eight cores and 16 threads pay dividends in games optimized for parallelization.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="gta-v-and-hitman">GTA: V and Hitman</h2><h2 id="grand-theft-auto-v-2">Grand Theft Auto V </h2><p><em>Grand Theft Auto V</em><span> </span>favors Intel architectures and, more generally, multi-core designs with high clock rates.</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/3VWr8ofBhipHHGJS2DftgQ.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/4YvWAc77ruh8uAgYAvMqMB.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/qa6xQ6CGuYsgoSLGAaqZBd.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>The Core i5-9600K establishes a sizable lead over AMD's fastest processors. Strangely, though, an overclocked -9600K trails the tuned -8600K yet again.</p><h2 id="hitman-2">Hitman </h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/pxxn985DP2mQrojF36vRs7.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/A5LyENKgJZCid9ULRsAECN.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/m4TcKMG2EzArabadzA45zn.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>Intel's Core i5-9600K easily beats the Ryzen chips in spite of their thread count advantage.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="shadow-of-war-and-project-cars-2-2">Shadow Of War and Project CARS 2</h2><h2 id="middle-earth-shadow-of-war-2">Middle-earth: Shadow Of War</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/awHhWrzW4ucaRCLnTVB4FN.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/j2jaxRBZZyin5qSKTzbo9Y.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/EEr8gQjsYyJSkbwBTjNoDA.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p><em>Shadow of War</em> leans heavier on graphics resources than host processing, so we don't see much difference between the fastest and slowest CPUs. We test at 1920 x 1080, and at a high-enough resolution, most games are indeed limited by your GPU. Plan accordingly if you're running into a bottleneck.</p><h2 id="project-cars-2-2">Project CARS 2</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/RAKuJtLF2hLdBQHuqjaeom.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/pcBEMYdwEqa537XucvZHVT.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/q2NMRmJJFFkKuWo5NpZ3sa.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>Although <em>Project CARS 2</em> is purportedly optimized for threading, clock rates have the greatest effect on this title's frame rates. The test pool splits into two distinct groups with Intel processors up top and Ryzen CPUs at the bottom.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="office-and-productivity-2">Office and Productivity</h2><h2 id="adobe-creative-cloud-2">Adobe Creative Cloud</h2><p>Even though this suite has a few parallelized workloads, its final score is heavily influenced by the lightly-threaded tasks common in most desktop applications.</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/JVR3enZ26BvTM2LrsuQB8.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/V389vMFVjdKUtNE8Qh8AFe.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/DcEjgcU234uGeGkMkKhYsR.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/WpnBi6X7wuwAgCzAR6xwYV.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/Km2KgAAkPD4TbWbnfo2q5h.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/3f3XaXqDwYhc4FAQ8TUyL5.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>The Core i5-9600K clearly excels in lightly-threaded tasks, while AMD's Ryzen carves out wins in the threaded applications. Overclocking does help Intel more, though.</p><p>We see slight advances favoring Intel's -9600K over the -8600K, but it's definitely not worth upgrading from the latter to the former.</p><h2 id="web-browser-2">Web Browser</h2><p>The Krakken suite evaluates JavaScript performance using audio, imaging, and cryptography workloads. Like most browser-based benchmarks, single-threaded performance reigns supreme.</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/M3G5w68v4u67FdiWThWXKj.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/zWtU3MmYwztW4fmEj4Citk.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/pyPacCPEe9wAbr5kkXAUoh.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>The stock Core i5-9600K leverages its relatively high clock rates to outperform the Ryzen processors.</p><h2 id="productivity-2">Productivity</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/AYMaxkD5sJTv6F4TTaPNF.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/2HGzWZDGL74TEDB6RDVpMX.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/LXzwGVSKjESTbd2ixEAZA9.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/wThDsTkXzbBCgLnAVbnc4Z.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/RxqeHGnm7DtxosAMFKzPFm.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>The application start-up metric measures load time snappiness in word processors, GIMP, and Web browsers under warm- and cold-start conditions. Other platform-level considerations affect this test as well, including the storage subsystem. Single-core performance largely determines responsiveness, so Intel's processors form a predictable hierarchy based on their frequencies.</p><p>Our video conferencing suite measures performance in single- and multi-user applications that utilize the Windows Media Foundation for playback and encoding. It also performs facial detection to model real-world usage. This workload responds well to available resources, so AMD's Ryzen family fares well. For example, the Ryzen 5 2600X takes a commanding lead over the Core i5-9600K. Even a Ryzen 7 2700 and its relatively low base clock rate ekes past the overclocked -9600K.</p><p>The photo editing benchmark measures performance with Futuremark's binaries using the ImageMagick library. Common photo processing workloads also tend to be parallelized, giving the Ryzen 7 2700 and Ryzen 5 2600X an easy advantage over Intel's Core i5-9600K. Also bear in mind that an overclocked Ryzen 7 2700 and 2700X offer similar performance.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="rendering-encoding-and-compression-2">Rendering, Encoding and Compression</h2><h2 id="rendering-2">Rendering</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/zwLYd2wQ6eXjBgobEJPqGC.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/z8dBdFTaEtQEs6oUXgMYu.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/yYBsUpHaYh4KAV4et9o7Eb.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/UEtXzJbpj6RWLTe5xpgNjP.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/SfJgQFTmh6uGxefMpJE67R.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/7K2EyiiPbgNFiRZMEDeb8M.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/eWQWVXqe4c5QNSNsbQdywW.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/A63YtPPJaWQKgg5hcdDjM8.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/26Jqy5w4eubpnSqtCKpGMa.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>AMD's Ryzen 7 2700 shows the value of eight cores armed with simultaneous multi-threading technology through our parallelized rendering workloads.</p><p>The Core i5-9600K trails its comparably-priced competition from AMD, and it only offers a small step forward versus the previous-gen Core i5-8600K.</p><p>Single-threaded workloads, regardless of software type, are still dominated by Intel's capable architectures.</p><h2 id="encoding-amp-compression">Encoding & Compression</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/Y67AFYfxDqskydib9cSuFf.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/DaGkaxCo7WxRfFKXWh9r7W.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/VrKCmshaMGKfPfizu6N2f6.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/CyEyWdBdiVsG9ybUZPmNoi.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/QRre24p37jzkKc3CwTS9Yk.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/JTgi8vBzj3bzA5mUJVCpBf.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ExKUb9Zk5YeWfaocATCV9b.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>Our threaded compression and decompression metrics work directly from system memory, removing storage throughput from the equation. The Ryzen 7 2700 and Ryzen 5 2600X are competitive in the compression test, but really stretch their legs during our decompression workload.</p><p>y-cruncher, a single- and multi-threaded program that computes pi, is a great benchmark for measuring the effect of AVX instructions. Intel processors have no trouble establishing a lead in this kind of test.</p><p>The Core i5-9600K beats AMD's Ryzen 7 2700 and Ryzen 5 2600X in our HandBrake x265 metric, which is heavily optimized for AVX instructions. That changes during the H.264 benchmark, which sees the Core i5-9600K trail a stock Ryzen 5 2600X. Intel needs a 5 GHz overclock to overtake the stock Ryzen 7 2700.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="conclusion-2">Conclusion </h2><p>Intel’s ninth-gen Core i5-9600K is so similar to the eighth-gen Core i5-8600K that it does little to change the family’s competitive position against AMD's Ryzen line-up. Similar to the original Coffee Lake model, Core i5-9600K gives you six physical cores without Hyper-Threading technology, plus 9MB of L3 cache in a similar 95W package. The company does throw in slightly faster base and multi-core Turbo Boost frequencies, enabled through the use of solder-based thermal interface material to help with heat.</p><p>In the chart below, we plot gaming performance using average frame rates and a geometric mean of the 99<sup>th</sup> percentile frame times (a good indicator of smoothness), which we then convert into a frame-per-second measurement. Bear in mind that we tested with a Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 at 1920 x 1080 to alleviate graphics-imposed bottlenecks. Differences between our test subjects shrink at higher resolutions.</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/iNnt5Ef5dhBXd6jhvezHDg.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/SdrANorStoQHdQvKRih6r3.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/KGgC3LdTtoPFaRQAvYUEag.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/uSbzwYdRTfyqfksLCbxu35.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/L95BBhqCC6EuunN4rteTwe.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/gzZWro6NXp3KKLuj3FDzyH.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/kyouAnDrQogAuCvuSFaJB6.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/yVM3J2b2UfrZ4fyUJ9DZFn.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/dKnHJo6m7AWbEWDwTqZk2H.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/7iTtzHcTyeKW57gD9xmXSa.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>The Core i5-9600K is the fastest gaming chip in its price range. But the performance advantage you get over an overclocked Ryzen 7 2700 or Ryzen 5 2600X might not justify spending extra money or sacrificing performance in other tasks. We know from experience that Intel's Core processors dominate when it comes to Web browsing, gaming, and office apps. But the Core i5-9600K isn't as competitive in heavily-threaded benchmarks like ones that involve rendering.</p><p>AMD's $299 Ryzen 7 2700 comes with a bundled cooler. That gives it a leg up on the ~$270 Core i5-9600K, which doesn't include a thermal solution. In both cases, you'll want something beefy sitting on top of the heat spreader for a shot at an aggressive overclock. You also get eight cores and 16 threads from the Ryzen. But it really needs tuning in order to keep up. Taking a small step down, the $225 Ryzen 5 2600X costs less than the Core i5-9600K and, again, comes with a heat sink/fan. However, you lose some performance in lightly-threaded tasks in exchange for a lower price tag.</p><p>Intel's ninth-gen Core CPUs add the benefit of solder-based thermal interface material. Aside from enabling higher multi-core Turbo Boost bins, the improved heat transfer didn't seem to do much for our tuning efforts. Maybe our sample is simply sub-par. But we think it's more plausible that Intel already squeezed most of the headroom out of this chip and its 14nm process. Fortunately, even a modest air cooler is fine for stock operation. The Core i5-9600K's relatively tame power draw is a good fit for mainstream motherboards. Just remember that you need a Z-series platform in order to overclock.</p><p>Choosing between a Core i5-9600K and Ryzen presents the same conundrum we've faced in the past: it depends on the type of software you run most frequently. If you're a gamer who doesn't really venture beyond 1920x1080, Intel's Core i5-9600K is the chip for you. But if a majority of your workloads are threaded in nature, including content creation and productivity, a powerful Ryzen gets you more performance at a competitive price.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ AMD Ryzen 5 2600X Hits All-Time Low Price: $144.99 ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-ryzen-5-2600x-deal-sale-lowest-price,40001.html</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ Looking for a new CPU? Newegg is offering the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X for an all-time low of $144.99. ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">3ZYD8kf7b2mmuPvKzz7Y86</guid>
                                                                                                <enclosure url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/6GAzdw8BTbPyZNwM3o59xe-1280-80.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="0"></enclosure>
                                                                        <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:32:01 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                <updated>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 08:41:06 +0000</updated>
                                                                                                                                            <category><![CDATA[CPUs]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[PC Components]]></category>
                                                                                                                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Sarah Lord ]]></dc:creator>                                                                                                        <dc:description><![CDATA[ null ]]></dc:description>
                                                                                                                                <cf:isSponsored>false</cf:isSponsored>
                <cf:hasAffiliateLinks>false</cf:hasAffiliateLinks>
                <cf:isPaid>false</cf:isPaid>
                                                                                                                                <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/6GAzdw8BTbPyZNwM3o59xe-1280-80.jpg">
                                                            <media:credit><![CDATA[null]]></media:credit>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </media:content>
                                                    <media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/6GAzdw8BTbPyZNwM3o59xe-1280-80.jpg" />
                                                                                                                                                                    <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:1000px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:100.00%;"><img id="" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/6GAzdw8BTbPyZNwM3o59xe.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/6GAzdw8BTbPyZNwM3o59xe.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="1000" height="1000" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/6GAzdw8BTbPyZNwM3o59xe.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><p>Summer temperatures are sizzling, and so are the deals on AMD's second-generation Ryzen 5 processor. Today, Newegg has the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X desktop processor for an all time low of $144.99 <strong>using the code </strong><strong>EMCTCVW22</strong> at checkout. Newegg also throws in a three-month Xbox Game Pass for free with the purchase. That’s $114.56 off the $259.55 MSRP, although the CPU is currently on sale at <a href="https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-Processor-Wraith-Cooler/dp/B07B428V2L">Amazon</a> for $149.99.</p><ul><li><a href="https://www.newegg.com/amd-ryzen-5-2600x/p/N82E16819113497?Item=N82E16819113497">Get the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X for $144.99</a>.</li></ul><p>The Ryzen 5 2600X features six <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/cpu-core-definition,37658.html">cores</a> and 12 <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-computing-thread-definition,5765.html">threads</a>, a <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/clock-speed-definition,37657.html">frequency</a> of 4.2 GHz and 19MB of combined cache. You also won't have to <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cooling-buying-guide,6105.html">shop for a CPU cooler</a>, as the chip comes with the Wraith Spire Cooler. </p><h2 id="is-this-cpu-deal-for-you">Is This CPU Deal For You? </h2><p>In our <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-5-2600x,5579.html">Ryzen 5 2600X review</a>, we praised its lower cache and memory latencies and more sophisticated multi-core boosts. In addition, the extra threads were helpful for both gaming and everyday productivity tasks. Be sure to check out the benchmarks for an in-depth look at this processor.</p><p>If you're still not sure if this is the processor for you, take a look at our <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">CPU hierarchy</a> to see where this chip ranks. You can also find our top recommendations on our <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best Gaming CPUs</a> and <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-performance-cpus,5683.html">Best Productivity CPUs</a> pages and shopping tips and guidelines in our <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-buying-guide,5643.html">CPU buying guide</a>. </p><iframe src="https://content.jwplatform.com/players/zYBgfFoA.html" id="zYBgfFoA" title="Buy the Right CPU" width="1920" height="1080" frameborder="0" scrolling="auto" allowfullscreen></iframe>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ AMD's Ryzen 5 2600 Drops to a Stunning $120 at Newegg and Amazon ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-ryzen-5-2600-deal-newegg,39923.html</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ Act fast, Newegg and Amazon are listing the Ryzen 5 2600 at an incredible $119.99 ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">BnS7qPbpaQkSEA5qSxJq5V</guid>
                                                                                                <enclosure url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/p7wBWi2NrayRL8HyQxjqcK-1280-80.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="0"></enclosure>
                                                                        <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2019 04:27:00 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                <updated>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 08:55:05 +0000</updated>
                                                                                                                                            <category><![CDATA[CPUs]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[PC Components]]></category>
                                                                                                <author><![CDATA[ palcorn@outlook.com (Paul Alcorn) ]]></author>                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Paul Alcorn ]]></dc:creator>                                                                                    <dc:source><![CDATA[ https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/RZRmFeQfPy3etHjBQitbGW.jpeg ]]></dc:source>
                                                                <dc:description><![CDATA[ &lt;p&gt;As a teenager, Paul scraped up enough money to buy a 486-powered PC with a turbo button (yes, a turbo button). Back when floppies were still popular he was already chasing after the fastest spinners for his personal computer, which led him down the long and winding storage road, covering enterprise storage. His current focus is on consumer processors, though he still keeps a close eye on the latest storage news. In his spare time, you’ll find Paul hanging out with his kids or indulging his love of the Kansas City Chiefs and Royals.&lt;/p&gt; ]]></dc:description>
                                                                                                                                <cf:isSponsored>false</cf:isSponsored>
                <cf:hasAffiliateLinks>false</cf:hasAffiliateLinks>
                <cf:isPaid>false</cf:isPaid>
                                                                                                                                <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/p7wBWi2NrayRL8HyQxjqcK-1280-80.jpg">
                                                            <media:credit><![CDATA[Newegg]]></media:credit>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </media:content>
                                                    <media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/p7wBWi2NrayRL8HyQxjqcK-1280-80.jpg" />
                                                                                                                                                                    <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:1056px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:76.14%;"><img id="" name="" alt="Credit: Newegg" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/p7wBWi2NrayRL8HyQxjqcK.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/p7wBWi2NrayRL8HyQxjqcK.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="1056" height="804" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/p7wBWi2NrayRL8HyQxjqcK.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div><figcaption itemprop="caption description" class="pull-"><span class="credit" itemprop="copyrightHolder">(Image credit: Newegg)</span></figcaption></figure><p><em>Update: Both Newegg and <a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07B41WS48/">Amazon</a> now have the Ryzen 5 2600 down to $119.99 ($80 off)</em></p><p>AMD's Ryzen 5 2600 may be a last-gen processor, but it comes packing quite the punch with six cores and twelve threads cranking away at 3.4 GHz base and 3.9 GHz boost clocks. Newegg has slashed pricing on this great processor down to $120 to counter Amazon's Prime Day festivities. This is the lowest price we've seen for this processor at retail, so you're the winner. </p><p>AMD also throws in as three-month subscription for Xbox Game Pass with any purchase, which will keep you occupied as you try out the latest games.</p><ul><li><a href="https://www.newegg.com/amd-ryzen-5-2600/p/N82E16819113496">AMD Ryzen 5 2600</a> for <strong>$119.99</strong> ($80 off)</li></ul><p>The 65W chip comes with a bundled Wraith Spire Stealth heat sink/fan combo that will help cut costs for your build, though you might need something a bit beefier if you plan on overclocking.</p><p>We kicked the tires on this chip last year, so <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-5-2600,5625.html">head to our full review for the rundown</a>. Overall, AMD's Ryzen 5 2600 provides excellent performance in productivity applications and competitive frame rates in games. It's also an attractive choice for anyone building a PC in a compact case, given its 65W TDP.</p><p>You'll need to act fast, though. This deal expires soon</p><p>For more savings, check out our list of best <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/best-prime-day-deals,39341.html">Amazon Prime Day deals</a> and <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/best-tech-deals,30458.html">best pc hardware deals</a> overall as well as dedicated lists of current sales on <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/best-ssd-deals,38052.html">ssds</a>, <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/best-cpu-deals,38137.html">cpus</a>, <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/best-gpu-deals,37951.html">gpus</a>, <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/best-gaming-laptop-deals,38127.html">gaming laptops</a> and <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/raspberry-pi-deals,39918.html">Raspberry Pi stuff.</a></p><iframe src="https://content.jwplatform.com/players/7AgPc2Q8.html" id="7AgPc2Q8" title="Buy the Right SSD" width="1920" height="1080" frameborder="0" scrolling="auto" allowfullscreen></iframe>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ AMD Ryzen 2000-Series CPUs Hit All-Time Low Prices on Amazon ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-ryzen-5-2600x-ryzen-7-2700x-amazon-deal,39812.html</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ Previous generation AMD Ryzen 5 2600x processor with Wraith Spire Cooler is now on sale for $160 at Amazon. ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">YAqASUzrQi9FBS8mNewUEH</guid>
                                                                                                <enclosure url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/KTCT3rR47QPwFvgP6TAjqb-1280-80.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="0"></enclosure>
                                                                        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 19:12:02 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                <updated>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 12:55:13 +0000</updated>
                                                                                                                                            <category><![CDATA[CPUs]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[PC Components]]></category>
                                                                                                                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Sarah Lord ]]></dc:creator>                                                                                                        <dc:description><![CDATA[ null ]]></dc:description>
                                                                                                                                <cf:isSponsored>false</cf:isSponsored>
                <cf:hasAffiliateLinks>false</cf:hasAffiliateLinks>
                <cf:isPaid>false</cf:isPaid>
                                                                                                                                <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/KTCT3rR47QPwFvgP6TAjqb-1280-80.jpg">
                                                            <media:credit><![CDATA[null]]></media:credit>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </media:content>
                                                    <media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/KTCT3rR47QPwFvgP6TAjqb-1280-80.jpg" />
                                                                                                                                                                    <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:1500px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:56.20%;"><img id="" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/KTCT3rR47QPwFvgP6TAjqb.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/KTCT3rR47QPwFvgP6TAjqb.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="1500" height="843" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/KTCT3rR47QPwFvgP6TAjqb.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><p>AMD released the <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ryzen-9-3900x-7-3700x-review,6214.html">new Ryze</a>n 3000-series processors on Sunday night, but those who don’t need the latest and greatest can now pick up the previous generation Ryzen 5 2600X with Wraith Spire Cooler for $160. With only a week left before <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/best-prime-day-deals,39341.html">Prime Day</a>, Amazon looks to be clearing out its stock of the previous generation processors. This current price is 38% off the $259.55 MSRP and also matches Amazon’s all time low for the Ryzen 5 2600X. </p><ul><li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07B428V2L?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware-deal">Get the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X for $160.</a></li></ul><p>The Ryzen 5 2600X features 6 Cores/12 threads, a frequency of 4.2 and 19MB of combined cache. Its max temperature is 95°C and includes Wraith Spire Cooler. </p><p>We praised the <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-5-2600x,5579.html">Ryzen 5 2600X</a> for its lower cache and memory latencies,  more sophisticated multi-core boosts, and felt that the extra threads were helpful for both gaming and everyday productivity. </p><h2 id="ryzen-5-2600-hits-all-time-low">Ryzen 5 2600 Hits All-Time Low</h2><p>The <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-5-2600,5625.html">Ryzen 5 2600</a> has hit an all time low of $140 with a Wraith cooler. It's also a 6C/12T processor, but as we said on our review, the extra $20 (even in this sale) can get you the 2600X more overclocking headroom</p><ul><li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07B41WS48?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware-deal">Get the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 for $140.</a></li></ul><h2 id="ryzen-7-2700x-gets-cheaper">Ryzen 7 2700X Gets Cheaper</h2><p>AMD's Ryzen 7 2700X with Wraith Prism LED cooler is selling for $254.99 on Amazon, its lowest selling price yet. </p><ul><li><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07B428M7F?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware-deal">Get the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X for $254.99</a></li></ul><p>We praised this 8C/16T processor's value, memory and cache performance and power over the 1800X.</p><p>Not sure what processor is right for you? Be sure to check out our <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-buying-guide,5643.html">CPU buying guide</a> and our <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPU picks for 2019</a> for insights, reviews and recommendations.  </p>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Hits Its Lowest Price Ever: $150 ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-ryzen-5-2600-cpu-deal-sale,39225.html</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ For a limited time, Newegg is selling AMD's Ryzen 5 2600 hexa-core processor for $150. ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">Vs2rSAPLLGxgxjsiYnVLjU</guid>
                                                                                                <enclosure url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/73KqoiJWJy7zngiymZLjy4-1280-80.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="0"></enclosure>
                                                                        <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2019 16:00:02 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                <updated>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 12:52:25 +0000</updated>
                                                                                                                                            <category><![CDATA[CPUs]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[PC Components]]></category>
                                                                                                                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Zhiye Liu ]]></dc:creator>                                                                                    <dc:source><![CDATA[ https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/HhmwL5w9ggUtLCPfqGjTi4.jpg ]]></dc:source>
                                                                <dc:description><![CDATA[ &lt;p&gt;Zhiye’s love for PC hardware began when he accidentally set his Pentium P54CS PC on fire, short-circuiting his entire home. From that day on, he has constantly pursued greater hardware knowledge, which ultimately led him from being a power user to a writer at Tom’s Hardware. When Zhiye’s not covering the latest news on CPUs or GPUs, you can find him overclocking RAM to the latest trance hits.&lt;/p&gt; ]]></dc:description>
                                                                                                                                <cf:isSponsored>false</cf:isSponsored>
                <cf:hasAffiliateLinks>false</cf:hasAffiliateLinks>
                <cf:isPaid>false</cf:isPaid>
                                                                                                                                <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/73KqoiJWJy7zngiymZLjy4-1280-80.jpg">
                                                            <media:credit><![CDATA[Newegg]]></media:credit>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </media:content>
                                                    <media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/73KqoiJWJy7zngiymZLjy4-1280-80.jpg" />
                                                                                                                                                                    <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:1280px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:75.00%;"><img id="" name="" alt="Credit: Newegg" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/73KqoiJWJy7zngiymZLjy4.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/73KqoiJWJy7zngiymZLjy4.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="1280" height="960" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/73KqoiJWJy7zngiymZLjy4.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div><figcaption itemprop="caption description" class="pull-"><span class="credit" itemprop="copyrightHolder">(Image credit: Newegg)</span></figcaption></figure><p>Unless you've been living under a rock, you probably know that AMD is celebrating its <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/picturestory/872-amd-50th-anniversary-milestones-highlights.html">50th anniversary</a> today. In addition to <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-50th-anniversary-cpus-gpus-motherboard,39171.html">commemorative editions of the Ryzen 7 2700X and Radeon VII</a>, there are also many AMD deals out there. One that particulay caught our eye is the Ryzen 5 2600 processor, which is currently on sale at Newegg for $150 with the promotional code EMCTYWT23.</p><ul><li><a href="http://www.tkqlhce.com/click-8900246-12920453?sid=tomshardware-&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newegg.com%2FProduct%2FProduct.aspx%3FItem%3DN82E16819113496">Get the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 for $149.99</a>.</li></ul><p>What makes the Ryzen 5 2600 an even sweeter deal is the included AMD50 game bundle, which has a $139 value. Upon purchase, you'll receive two games codes to redeem free copies of <em>Tom Clancy's The Division 2 Gold Edition</em> and<em> World War Z</em>.</p><p>The Ryzen 5 2600 is AMD's current mid-range consumer desktop processor. The chip features six <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/cpu-core-definition,37658.html">cores</a>, 12 <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-computing-thread-definition,5765.html">threads</a> and 16MB of L3 <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/pc-cache-definition,37649.html">cache</a>. The processor has a 3.4GHz base <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/clock-speed-definition,37657.html">clock speed</a> and a 3.9GHz turbo. Like AMD's other second-generation Ryzen processors, the Ryzen 5 2600 comes unlocked for overclocking.</p><p>Other notable specs of the Ryzen 5 2600 include support for 16 high-speed <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/pcie-definition,5754.html">PCIe 3.0 lanes</a>, dual-channel <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-ram,4057.html">DDR4 memory modules</a> up to 2,933MHz and a 65W TDP (thermal design power). AMD's Wraith Stealth CPU cooler accompanies the processor.</p><p>Below is a table comparing the Ryzen 5 2600 among other similar CPUs. </p><h2 id="amd-ryzen-5-2600-specs-comparison">AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Specs Comparison</h2><div ><table><tbody><tr><td  ></td><td  ><strong>Cores /Threads</strong></td><td  ><strong>Base /Boost Clock Speed (GHz)</strong></td><td  ><strong>Cache(MB)</strong></td><td  ><strong>PCIe 3.0</strong></td><td  ><strong>Interface / Chipset</strong></td><td  ><strong>Unlocked Multiplier</strong></td><td  ><strong>DRAM</strong></td><td  ><strong>TDP</strong></td><td  ><strong>Price (at time of writing)</strong></td><td  ><strong>PricePer Core</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Intel Core i7-8700K</strong></td><td  >6 / 12</td><td  >3.7 / 4.7</td><td  >12</td><td  >16</td><td  >1151 / Z370</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Dual DDR4-2666</td><td  >95W</td><td  >$369.99</td><td  >$61.67</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>AMD Ryzen 5 2600X</strong></td><td  >6 / 12</td><td  >3.6 / 4.2</td><td  >16</td><td  >16</td><td  >AM4 / X470</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Dual DDR4-2933</td><td  >95W</td><td  >$179.99</td><td  >$30</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>AMD Ryzen 5 2600</strong></td><td  >6 / 12</td><td  >3.4 / 3.9</td><td  >16</td><td  >16</td><td  >AM4 / X470</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Dual DDR4-2933</td><td  >65W</td><td  >$149.99</td><td  >$25</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>AMD Ryzen 5 1600X</strong></td><td  >6 / 12</td><td  >3.6 / 4</td><td  >16</td><td  >16</td><td  >AM4 / X370</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Dual DDR4-2666</td><td  >95W</td><td  >$150.89</td><td  >$25.15</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>AMD Ryzen 5 1600</strong></td><td  >6 / 12</td><td  >3.2 / 3.6</td><td  >16</td><td  >16</td><td  >AM4 / X370</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Dual DDR4-2666</td><td  >65W</td><td  >$119.89</td><td  >$19.98</td></tr></tbody></table></div><p>At the current pricing, the Ryzen 5 2600 is the most cost-effective option for a six-core, 12-thread processor. The Ryzen 5 2600 is approximately $25 per core at this price, which is even cheaper than AMD's last-generation <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-5-1600x-cpu-review,5014.html">Ryzen 5 1600X</a>.</p><h2 id="should-you-buy-this-cpu">Should You Buy This CPU?</h2><p>We highly recommend you check out our in-depth <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-5-2600,5625.html">AMD Ryzen 5 2600 review</a> before opening your wallet.</p><p>For more help making your purchase, review our <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-buying-guide,5643.html">CPU Buying Guide</a> for help. To see where this processor ranks among others currently available, including from rival Intel, check out our <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">CPU hierarchy page</a>. And for other CPUs we love, see our <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cheap-cpus,5668.html">best cheap CPUs</a>, <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">favorite gaming CPUs</a> and <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-performance-cpus,5683.html">best CPUs for productivity performance</a> pages.</p><iframe src="https://content.jwplatform.com/players/zYBgfFoA.html" id="zYBgfFoA" title="Buy the Right CPU" width="1920" height="1080" frameborder="0" scrolling="auto" allowfullscreen></iframe>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ Awesome UK Deal on AMD's Ryzen 5 2600 - Price Cut by 24% ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-ryzen-processor-25-off,39192.html</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ AMD's Ryzen 5 2600 is now on sale in the UK with a staggering 24% price cut off its retail cost. That's an awesome 6 core and 12 thread processor deal for under £135. ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">TjbuPCknkScYWbPWTgZag5</guid>
                                                                                                <enclosure url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ngrVnJ5Y87XQiwMYcc5drR-1280-80.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="0"></enclosure>
                                                                        <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 12:20:02 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                <updated>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 12:44:22 +0000</updated>
                                                                                                                                            <category><![CDATA[GPUs]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[PC Components]]></category>
                                                                                                <author><![CDATA[ zak.storey@futurenet.com (Zak Storey) ]]></author>                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Zak Storey ]]></dc:creator>                                                                                    <dc:source><![CDATA[ https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ZRQSrwzMDegmzcefpB2GDd.jpg ]]></dc:source>
                                                                <dc:description><![CDATA[ null ]]></dc:description>
                                                                                                                                <cf:isSponsored>false</cf:isSponsored>
                <cf:hasAffiliateLinks>false</cf:hasAffiliateLinks>
                <cf:isPaid>false</cf:isPaid>
                                                                                                                                <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ngrVnJ5Y87XQiwMYcc5drR-1280-80.jpg">
                                                            <media:credit><![CDATA[null]]></media:credit>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </media:content>
                                                    <media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ngrVnJ5Y87XQiwMYcc5drR-1280-80.jpg" />
                                                                                                                                                                    <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:1500px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:56.20%;"><img id="" name="" alt="AMD's Ryzen 5 2600 is a smashing deal at £133 for a 6 core processor" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ngrVnJ5Y87XQiwMYcc5drR.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ngrVnJ5Y87XQiwMYcc5drR.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="1500" height="843" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ngrVnJ5Y87XQiwMYcc5drR.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div><figcaption itemprop="caption description" class="pull-"><span class="caption-text">AMD's Ryzen 5 2600 is a smashing deal at £133 for a 6 core processor </span></figcaption></figure><h2 id="amd-s-ryzen-5-2600-6-core-cpu-is-on-sale-for-133-41-off">AMD’s Ryzen 5 2600 6 core CPU is on sale for £133 (£41 off)</h2><p>Ahh here cometh the pay-day CPU deals. AMD’s Ryzen 5 2600 is currently available for an impressive £133. That’s almost 25% off its retail price, which is crazy when you think about just what you’re getting with this thing. Go back only two years, and a mainstream quad core eight thread processor would set you back near enough £400. Today, you can get two extra cores, four extra threads, a ton of extra cache, and relatively similar clock speeds for a fraction of that price and setup cost. And that is nice, all praise our Ryzen CPU overlords. <br/> </p><ul><li>Grab this deal today from <strong><a href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B07B41WS48/">amazon.co.uk</a></strong> for <strong>£133</strong> (24% off)</li></ul><p> <br/>One of the big criticisms of AMD’s Ryzen 5 2600 processor on launch was just how little difference there was between it and it’s <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-5-2600x,5579.html">Ryzen 5 2600X</a> bigger brother. In fact, there was only about £20 difference between the two, and for the cash you got yourself a higher clock speed and better silicon, so why go with the lower part? Well with these kind of deals that gap widens massively and it certainly makes the Ryzen 5 2600 far more impressive than when it first launched this time last year.</p><h2 id="ryzen-5-2600-use-cases">Ryzen 5 2600 Use Cases</h2><p>So why is it worth buying a Ryzen 5 2600? Well you can check out our full review <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-5-2600,5625.html">here</a>, however the big advantage for those moving to a CPU like this is what you can do on a productivity level. Those 12 threads found in the 2600 will definitely help when it comes to rendering applications, and multi-task workloads. If you’re into streaming, it’s an ideal part as leveraging those extra threads makes gaming and streaming on the same system far easier than if you were to do the same on a quad core. Take this thing to CineBench R15 and overclock it to a 4.2 GHz, and it’ll easily score the same as a stock <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-coffee-lake-i7-8700k-cpu,5252.html">Intel Core i7-8700K</a> processor.</p><p>Aside from that, the Ryzen refresh with the second series included a number of improvements to the overall Zen architecture, AMD’s 14nm was refined to 12nm, and memory latency was improved leaps and bounds over its successor, improving in-game performance quite dramatically. There’s also the software side of things too. Paired with a strong cooling solution the 2600 will quite merrily auto-overclock itself to 4.0 GHz and beyond fairly easily, go tinkering in those BIOS options yourself, or in AMD’s <a href="https://www.amd.com/en/technologies/ryzen-master">Ryzen Master utility </a>and it’s not too difficult to get this thing up to 4.2 GHz.</p><h2 id="specifications">Specifications</h2><div ><table><tbody><tr><td  ><strong>Base/Turbo Clock</strong></td><td  >3.4 / 3.9 GHz</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Socket</strong></td><td  >AM4</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Cores/Threads</strong></td><td  >6/12</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Lithography</strong></td><td  >12nm</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Cache</strong></td><td  >16MB</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Memory Support</strong></td><td  >DDR4 2933 MHz</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Memory Channels</strong></td><td  >2</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Max PCIe Lanes</strong></td><td  >16+4</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>TDP</strong></td><td  >65W</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Cooler Included</strong></td><td  >AMD Wraith Stealth Cooler</td></tr></tbody></table></div><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:1500px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:74.40%;"><img id="" name="" alt="The Ryzen refresh helped bat a way a lot of those 1st gen bugs." src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/Gt2nw9px2x5wXKXZ7GzSKc.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/Gt2nw9px2x5wXKXZ7GzSKc.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="1500" height="1116" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/Gt2nw9px2x5wXKXZ7GzSKc.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div><figcaption itemprop="caption description" class="pull-"><span class="caption-text">The Ryzen refresh helped bat a way a lot of those 1st gen bugs. </span></figcaption></figure><h2 id="could-be-better">Could be better?</h2><p>It’s not perfect of course. It does have its flaws, the Ryzen 5 2600’s single core performance is somewhat lacking compared to its Intel rivals. Although admittedly it performs about as well as a <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-coffee-lake-core-i5-8400-cpu,5281.html">Intel Core i5-8400</a> anyway, and if you’re still on anything Skylake and prior, this thing’ll still run rings around it on that front so no worries there.</p><p>On top of that, AMD’s Ryzen architecture is typically very memory dependent. This is due to the interconnect fabric (infinity fabric) AMD uses actually operating at the same clock speed as you’re system memory. The Infinity Fabric connects each of the Ryzen 5 2600’s core complexes together (each of the four holding 1 to 2 cores each), meaning that for them to communicate as fast as possible, you’ll need to invest in a 3000 MHz+ memory kit. In game AMD still suffers a bit compared to Intel however on the whole you’re talking anywhere between 0 and 5% frame rate at most and it varies depending on the title as well.</p><h2 id="perfect-pairings">Perfect Pairings</h2><p>If it were us, we’d pair this with a nice B450 ITX motherboard, perhaps one of <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/asrock-fatal1ty-b450-gaming-itx-ac-overclocking-motherboard,5824.html">ASRock’s Fatal1ty B450 Gaming-ITX/AC</a> mobos, <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-ram,4057.html">16GB of DDR4 running at 3200 MHz</a>, and maybe an Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 as well, just to get the most out of that 1080p resolution. In fact it’s fairly easy to couple this together with a 250GB M.2 and a 1TB Samsung 860 Evo and end up with an ITX system that’ll mash any productivity task you throw at it, any game at 1440p, and still come in at under £900.</p><p><em>Image Credits: Tom's Hardware / AMD</em></p><ul><li><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-performance-cpus,5683.html"><strong>Best Performance CPUs for Desktop Applications</strong></a></li><li><strong><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best Gaming CPUs 2019</a></strong></li></ul>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ AMD Launches Limited Edition Ryzen MAX CPU Bundles ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-ryzen-5-2600x-ryzen-7-2700-max,38131.html</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ AMD is now selling the Ryzen 5 2600X and Ryzen 7 2700 with the Wraith MAX Cooler included. ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">5pvSDej4x5SpYrAARf8hq3</guid>
                                                                                                <enclosure url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/eQj4sEskEPDEKFR6ECj7cT-1280-80.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="0"></enclosure>
                                                                        <pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2018 03:13:00 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                <updated>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 08:42:01 +0000</updated>
                                                                                                                                            <category><![CDATA[CPUs]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[PC Components]]></category>
                                                                                                                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Zhiye Liu ]]></dc:creator>                                                                                    <dc:source><![CDATA[ https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/HhmwL5w9ggUtLCPfqGjTi4.jpg ]]></dc:source>
                                                                <dc:description><![CDATA[ &lt;p&gt;Zhiye’s love for PC hardware began when he accidentally set his Pentium P54CS PC on fire, short-circuiting his entire home. From that day on, he has constantly pursued greater hardware knowledge, which ultimately led him from being a power user to a writer at Tom’s Hardware. When Zhiye’s not covering the latest news on CPUs or GPUs, you can find him overclocking RAM to the latest trance hits.&lt;/p&gt; ]]></dc:description>
                                                                                                                                <cf:isSponsored>false</cf:isSponsored>
                <cf:hasAffiliateLinks>false</cf:hasAffiliateLinks>
                <cf:isPaid>false</cf:isPaid>
                                                                                                                                <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/eQj4sEskEPDEKFR6ECj7cT-1280-80.jpg">
                                                            <media:credit><![CDATA[Scan Computers]]></media:credit>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </media:content>
                                                    <media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/eQj4sEskEPDEKFR6ECj7cT-1280-80.jpg" />
                                                                                                                                                                    <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:540px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:100.00%;"><img id="" name="" alt="Credit: Scan Computers" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/eQj4sEskEPDEKFR6ECj7cT.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/eQj4sEskEPDEKFR6ECj7cT.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="540" height="540" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/eQj4sEskEPDEKFR6ECj7cT.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div><figcaption itemprop="caption description" class="pull-"><span class="credit" itemprop="copyrightHolder">(Image credit: Scan Computers)</span></figcaption></figure><p>AMD has launched two limited edition "Ryzen MAX" processor bundles for this holiday season. The California-based chipmaker is offering the bundles with its <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-5-2600x,5579.html">Ryzen 5 2600X</a> hexa-core processor and <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ryzen-7-2700-2700x-review,5606.html">Ryzen 7 2700</a> octa-core processor.</p><p>The normal Ryzen 5 2600X comes with the Wraith Spire CPU cooler, while the Ryzen 7 2700 is sold with the Wraith Spire LED CPU cooler. The new <a href="https://www.scan.co.uk/products/amd-ryzen-5-2600x-max-am4-zenplus-6-core-12-thread-36ghz-425ghz-turbo-19mb-cache-95w-cpu-boxpluswrai">Ryzen 5 2600X MAX</a> (YD260XBCAFMAX) and <a href="https://www.scan.co.uk/products/amd-ryzen-7-2700-max-am4-zenplus-8-core-16-thread-32ghz-41ghz-turbo-20mb-cache-65w-cpu-box-plus-wrai">Ryzen 7 2700 MAX</a> (YD2700BBAFMAX) bundles come with the more beefy Wraith Max cooler.</p><p>The Wraith Max cooler is rated for up to 200W of heat dissipation, which will allow consumers to take full advantage of AMD's XFR2 (Extended Frequency Range 2) technology and provides more headroom for overclocking. As a result, consumers don't have to shell out extra money to pick up an aftermarket heatsink.</p><p>UK computer hardware retailer Scan Computers sells the non-MAX versions of the Ryzen 5 2600X and Ryzen 7 2700 for £199.99 and £270.49, respectively. The MAX versions have been listed for £221.99 and £285.49, which is only a £22 difference in the case of the Ryzen 5 2600X and a mere £15 for the Ryzen 7 2700. The new MAX bundles are a pretty good deal considering that the Wraith Max cooler alone sells for £50.72 at Amazon UK.</p><p>AMD tells us that the MAX CPU bundles will show up at Newegg, Amazon, and Microcenter soon. We'll follow up with more information about the pricing as it becomes available.</p><h2 id="more-holiday-deals-coverage">More Holiday Deals Coverage</h2><ul><li><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/best-tech-deals,30458.html">Best Hardware Deals Overall</a></li><li><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/best-gpu-deals,37951.html">Best GPU Deals</a></li><li><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/best-tech-deals,30458.html">Best SSD Deals</a></li><li><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/best-cpu-deals,38137.html">Best CPU Deals</a></li><li><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/best-gaming-laptop-deals,38127.html">Best Gaming Laptop Deals</a></li><li><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-gaming-monitors,4533.html">Best Gaming Monitor Deals</a></li><li><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/pc-component-deal-help,5913.html">How to Find the Best Hardware Deals</a></li></ul><iframe src="https://content.jwplatform.com/players/8t21fsk4.html" id="8t21fsk4" title="Top Five Black Friday Tips" width="1920" height="1080" frameborder="0" scrolling="auto" allowfullscreen></iframe>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ AMD's Vega Graphics Coming To Gaming Laptops, Ryzen 7 2800H And Ryzen 5 2600H Listed ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-ryzen-7-2800h-2600h,37800.html</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ AMD listed the Ryzen 7 2800H and the Ryzen 5 2600H to its website. ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">ECx6pT8TY6z7XE8DrLmpWf</guid>
                                                                                                <enclosure url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/cRW83sKbvLesEt4qQw3sjF-1280-80.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="0"></enclosure>
                                                                        <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 14:37:00 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                <updated>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 08:59:23 +0000</updated>
                                                                                                                                            <category><![CDATA[CPUs]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[PC Components]]></category>
                                                                                                <author><![CDATA[ palcorn@outlook.com (Paul Alcorn) ]]></author>                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Paul Alcorn ]]></dc:creator>                                                                                    <dc:source><![CDATA[ https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/RZRmFeQfPy3etHjBQitbGW.jpeg ]]></dc:source>
                                                                <dc:description><![CDATA[ &lt;p&gt;As a teenager, Paul scraped up enough money to buy a 486-powered PC with a turbo button (yes, a turbo button). Back when floppies were still popular he was already chasing after the fastest spinners for his personal computer, which led him down the long and winding storage road, covering enterprise storage. His current focus is on consumer processors, though he still keeps a close eye on the latest storage news. In his spare time, you’ll find Paul hanging out with his kids or indulging his love of the Kansas City Chiefs and Royals.&lt;/p&gt; ]]></dc:description>
                                                                                                                                <cf:isSponsored>false</cf:isSponsored>
                <cf:hasAffiliateLinks>false</cf:hasAffiliateLinks>
                <cf:isPaid>false</cf:isPaid>
                                                                                                                                <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/cRW83sKbvLesEt4qQw3sjF-1280-80.jpg">
                                                            <media:credit><![CDATA[null]]></media:credit>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </media:content>
                                                    <media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/cRW83sKbvLesEt4qQw3sjF-1280-80.jpg" />
                                                                                                                                                                    <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:1280px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:85.47%;"><img id="" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/k8JN8uErhQAYgV4VYgJn9Q.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/k8JN8uErhQAYgV4VYgJn9Q.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="1280" height="1094" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/k8JN8uErhQAYgV4VYgJn9Q.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><p>AMD listed the <a href="https://www.amd.com/en/products/apu/amd-ryzen-7-2800h">Ryzen 7 2800H</a> and the <a href="https://www.amd.com/en/products/apu/amd-ryzen-5-2600h">Ryzen 5 2600H</a> on its website. These new processors bring the inherent goodness of the Raven Ridge architecture, found in the <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-5-2400g-zen-vega-cpu-gpu,5467-9.html">Ryzen 5 2400G and the Ryzen 3 2200G</a>, to gaming notebooks. As such, these processors come with AMD's Zen compute cores paired with the Vega graphics architecture, and they are also AMD's first processors to support DDR4-3200 as a base specification.</p><p>Both new models feature a similar design as their desktop counterparts, albeit with slightly redesigned in frequencies to adjust for the flimsy cooling in mobile form factors and battery life limitations. That's reflected in the processors' reduced 45W TDP (<a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/tdp-thermal-design-power-definition,5764.html">thermal design power</a>), which is much lower than the 65W TDP found on the desktop parts. AMD does give vendors some wiggle room with a configurable TDP (cTDP) range that spans between 35W and 45W.</p><p>The move to support for DDR4-3200 is an encouraging sign, as <a href="https://www.amd.com/en/products/apu/amd-ryzen-7-2800h">we've shown how readily the Raven Ridge parts respond to improved memory performance</a>. Pair that with Vega's higher clock speeds and these should be pretty powerful chips for the gaming laptop segment.</p><div ><table><tbody><tr><td  ></td><td  ><strong>Ryzen 7 2800H</strong></td><td  ><strong>Ryzen 7 2700U</strong></td><td  ><strong>Ryzen 5 2600H</strong></td><td  ><strong>Ryzen 5 2500U</strong></td><td  ><strong>Athlon 200GE</strong></td><td  ><strong>Ryzen 3 2200G</strong></td><td  ><strong>Ryzen 5 2400G</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>TDP</strong></td><td  >45W (35-54W cTDP)</td><td  >15W (12-25 cTDP)</td><td  >45W (35-54W cTDP)</td><td  >15W (12 -25 cTDP)</td><td  >35W</td><td  >65W</td><td  >65W</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Architecture</strong></td><td  >Zen</td><td  >Zen</td><td  >Zen</td><td  >Zen</td><td  >Zen</td><td  >Zen</td><td  >Zen</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Process</strong></td><td  >14nm</td><td  >14nm</td><td  >14nm</td><td  >14nm</td><td  >14nm</td><td  >14nm</td><td  >14nm</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Cores / Threads</strong></td><td  >4 / 8</td><td  >4 / 8</td><td  >4 / 8</td><td  >4 / 8</td><td  >2 / 4</td><td  >4 / 4</td><td  >4 / 8</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Frequency Base / Boost (GHz)</strong></td><td  >3.3 / 3.8</td><td  >2.2 / 3.8</td><td  >3.2 / 3.6</td><td  >2.0 / 3.6</td><td  >3.2 / -</td><td  >3.5 / 3.7</td><td  >3.6 / 3.9</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Memory Speed</strong></td><td  >DDR4-3200</td><td  >DDR4-2933</td><td  >DDR4-3200</td><td  >DDR4-2933</td><td  >DDR4-2677</td><td  >DDR4-2933</td><td  >DDR4-2933</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Memory Controller</strong></td><td  >Dual-Channel</td><td  >Dual-Channel</td><td  >Dual-Channel</td><td  >Dual-Channel</td><td  >Dual-Channel</td><td  >Dual-Channel</td><td  >Dual-Channel</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Cache (L3)</strong></td><td  >4MB</td><td  >4MB</td><td  >4MB</td><td  >4MB</td><td  >4MB</td><td  >4MB</td><td  >4MB</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Integrated Graphics</strong></td><td  >Radeon Vega 11 (11 CU) 1,300 MHz</td><td  >Radeon Vega 10 (10CU)</td><td  >Radeon Vega 8 (8 CU) 1,100 MHz</td><td  >Radeon Vega 8 (8CU)</td><td  >Radeon Vega 3 (3 CU)</td><td  >Radeon Vega 8 (8 CU) 1,250 MHz</td><td  >Radeon Vega 11 (11 CU) 1,100 MHz</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Unlocked Multiplier</strong></td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >No</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>MSRP</strong></td><td  >?</td><td  >?</td><td  >?</td><td  >?</td><td  >$55</td><td  >$99</td><td  >$160</td></tr></tbody></table></div><p>The Ryzen 7 2800H is analogous to the0 2700U and 2400G, but it comes with a 3.3 GHz base and 3.8 GHz boost clocks. The four-core, eight-thread CPU is complemented by Vega graphics with 11 CU (Compute Unit) clocked up to a max of 1,300 MHz, which is a nice boost over its desktop counterpart.</p><p>The Ryzen 5 2600H is similar to the 5 2500U and 2200G, but it's four cores are hyper-threaded, which is a big bonus. The Vega graphics come with 8 CUs and boost up to 1,100 MHz.</p><p>As a side note, we've already seen the Ryzen 7 2800H listed by <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-announces-new-raven-ridge-2018-apus,37678.html">HP in its All-In-One computers</a>, and <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-announces-new-raven-ridge-2018-apus,37678.html">AMD also recently touted its improved power efficiency</a>, though our colleague <a href="https://www.anandtech.com/show/13326/amd-updates-its-25x20-goal-progress-in-a-generation">Ian Cutress over at AnandTech has pointed out that AMD's power efficiency measurement methodology could use a second look</a>.</p><p>AMD lists the processors as available on September 10, but there hasn't been an official announcement yet, so pricing remains unknown. These processors will land at OEM and ODM customers, so pricing will likely depend upon volume.</p>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ ASRock Reveals Details on AMD's Ryzen 7 2700E & Ryzen 5 2600E CPUs ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-ryzen-2700e-2600e-cpu,37427.html</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ AMD is preparing 45W eight-core Ryzen 7 2700E and six-core Ryzen 5 2600E processors, according to new information from ASRock. ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">iQbsGVePzq2HnAXgFvvx2L</guid>
                                                                                                <enclosure url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/XsXeJ8ZgEy6xwN5ZRfHaaP-1280-80.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="0"></enclosure>
                                                                        <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                <updated>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 09:51:22 +0000</updated>
                                                                                                                                            <category><![CDATA[CPUs]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[PC Components]]></category>
                                                                                                                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Zhiye Liu ]]></dc:creator>                                                                                    <dc:source><![CDATA[ https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/HhmwL5w9ggUtLCPfqGjTi4.jpg ]]></dc:source>
                                                                <dc:description><![CDATA[ &lt;p&gt;Zhiye’s love for PC hardware began when he accidentally set his Pentium P54CS PC on fire, short-circuiting his entire home. From that day on, he has constantly pursued greater hardware knowledge, which ultimately led him from being a power user to a writer at Tom’s Hardware. When Zhiye’s not covering the latest news on CPUs or GPUs, you can find him overclocking RAM to the latest trance hits.&lt;/p&gt; ]]></dc:description>
                                                                                                                                <cf:isSponsored>false</cf:isSponsored>
                <cf:hasAffiliateLinks>false</cf:hasAffiliateLinks>
                <cf:isPaid>false</cf:isPaid>
                                                                                                                                <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/XsXeJ8ZgEy6xwN5ZRfHaaP-1280-80.jpg">
                                                            <media:credit><![CDATA[null]]></media:credit>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </media:content>
                                                    <media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/XsXeJ8ZgEy6xwN5ZRfHaaP-1280-80.jpg" />
                                                                                                                                                                    <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:1500px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:27.00%;"><img id="" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/XsXeJ8ZgEy6xwN5ZRfHaaP.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/XsXeJ8ZgEy6xwN5ZRfHaaP.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="1500" height="405" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/XsXeJ8ZgEy6xwN5ZRfHaaP.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><p>ASRock has added the 45W Ryzen 7 2700E and Ryzen 5 2600E processors to the processor support list document for its AMD motherboards based on the A320, B350, X370, and X470 chipsets.</p><p>Motherboard manufacturers always publish the official processor support list for each motherboard so potential consumers can verify whether or not the motherboard they are planning to purchase will play nice with a certain processor. It's also a great place to get the scoop on future AMD and Intel processors that have yet to see the light of day. On this occasion, Taiwanese manufacturer ASRock updated the processor support list for its AM4-based motherboards to include AMD's second-generation Ryzen 7 2700E and Ryzen 5 2600E processors.</p><p>The upcoming Ryzen 7 2700E and Ryzen 5 2600E processors are full-fledged members of AMD's 'Pinnacle Ridge' high-end desktop (HEDT) family based on the chipmaker's renowned Zen+ microarchitecture. As such, both models are also fabricated under GlobalFoundries' 12nm manufacturing process and fit just fine into any AM4-socket motherboards with the right version of BIOS, of course.</p><p>The Ryzen 7 2700E is the energy-efficient version of AMD's present flagship Ryzen 7 2700X processor. The processor comes with eight cores and 16 threads alongside 16MB of L3 cache and 4MB of L2 cache. When compared to its 105W brethren that runs at a base clock of 3.7 GHz, the Ryzen 7 2700E has a modest base clock of 2.8 GHz, which allows it to carry a 45W TDP rating. Unfortunately, ASRock isn't accustomed to listing the boost clocks for the supported processors on the list.</p><p>As the model number indicates, the Ryzen 5 2600E is the low-powered variant of the Ryzen 5 2600X. It has six cores, 12 threads, 16MB of L3 cache, and 3MB of L2 cache. The processor is clocked at a base clock of 3.1 GHz, which is only 500 MHz slower than its "x" part. The Ryzen 5 2600E is also a 45W processor.</p><p>With many European computer hardware stores are already taking pre-orders on the soon-to-be-released B450 motherboards, AMD's B450 chipset launch is imminent. We expect the Ryzen 7 2700E and Ryzen 5 2600E processors to accompany this launch.</p>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ The Core i7-8086K Review: 40 Years Of x86 ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-core-i7-8086k-cpu-8086-anniversary,5658.html</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ Intel pays homage to the 40th anniversary of the 8086, the first x86 processor, with the limited-edition Core i7-8086K. ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">Ve64cAEsEip9QvQjqvjuQT</guid>
                                                                                                <enclosure url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/gNS4LfKTyMoGQ5URjvTVEj-1280-80.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="0"></enclosure>
                                                                        <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                <updated>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 15:30:20 +0000</updated>
                                                                                                                                            <category><![CDATA[CPUs]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[PC Components]]></category>
                                                                                                <author><![CDATA[ palcorn@outlook.com (Paul Alcorn) ]]></author>                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Paul Alcorn ]]></dc:creator>                                                                                    <dc:source><![CDATA[ https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/RZRmFeQfPy3etHjBQitbGW.jpeg ]]></dc:source>
                                                                <dc:description><![CDATA[ &lt;p&gt;As a teenager, Paul scraped up enough money to buy a 486-powered PC with a turbo button (yes, a turbo button). Back when floppies were still popular he was already chasing after the fastest spinners for his personal computer, which led him down the long and winding storage road, covering enterprise storage. His current focus is on consumer processors, though he still keeps a close eye on the latest storage news. In his spare time, you’ll find Paul hanging out with his kids or indulging his love of the Kansas City Chiefs and Royals.&lt;/p&gt; ]]></dc:description>
                                                                                                                                <cf:isSponsored>false</cf:isSponsored>
                <cf:hasAffiliateLinks>false</cf:hasAffiliateLinks>
                <cf:isPaid>false</cf:isPaid>
                                                                                                                                <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/gNS4LfKTyMoGQ5URjvTVEj-1280-80.jpg">
                                                            <media:credit><![CDATA[null]]></media:credit>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </media:content>
                                                    <media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/gNS4LfKTyMoGQ5URjvTVEj-1280-80.jpg" />
                                                                                                                                                                    <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <h2 id="intel-core-i7-8086k-40th-anniversary-model">Intel Core i7-8086K 40th Anniversary Model</h2><p>Intel's 8086, the company's first processor to use its ubiquitous x86 instruction set architecture, debuted on June 8, 1978. Forty years later and by some stroke of fortuitous timing, Intel's desktop CPU portfolio is loaded with eighth-generation Core processors. So it was only fitting, then, that after a bit of <a href="https://twitter.com/david_schor/status/953979794437410816">prodding by a well-known chip analyst</a>, Intel announced that it'd pay homage to the 8086 with a 40th-anniversary limited-edition Core i7-8086K.</p><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:1510px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:74.97%;"><img id="" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/gNS4LfKTyMoGQ5URjvTVEj.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/gNS4LfKTyMoGQ5URjvTVEj.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="1510" height="1132" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/gNS4LfKTyMoGQ5URjvTVEj.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><p>Core i7-8086K is based on the same Coffee Lake architecture as Core i7-8700K, right down to its six Hyper-Threaded cores able to work on 12 threads concurrently. But it features a higher base frequency and more aggressive Turbo Boost bins, which tell us that Intel carefully picked out the best dies to use in these chips. This is the first Intel processor to ship with a 5 GHz Turbo Boost bin, matching AMD's record with the FX-9590. And if you're only looking at clock rate, the -8086K represents a 1000x multiplication of the original 8086's 5 MHz frequency.</p><p>Incidentally, the -8086K is also Intel's first six-core processor with a 4 GHz base frequency, though that specification isn't as eye-catching.</p><p>Intel kicked off its anniversary celebration with a <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-core-i7-8086k-40th-anniversary,37193.html">giveaway of 8086 Core i7-8086Ks</a>. If you didn't win one, you'll have to purchase the processor like we did. Your window of opportunity won't be large, though: our sources confirm a production run of just 50,000 units. We expect collector's items to sport premium pricing, and Intel doesn't disappoint in that department. As of this writing, the -8086K sells for $75 more than the once-flagship Core i7-8700K.</p><p>So what is this processor's appeal, other than the obvious nostalgia? Core i7-8086K comes from a higher-quality bin than Core i7-8700K, so enthusiasts with deep pockets can expect to receive the very best example of Coffee Lake silicon available. Of course, most folks won't consider the extra $75 worth paying for moderate gains at stock clock rates. But again, this is a limited-edition piece of hardware steeped in history.</p><h2 id="intel-core-i7-8600k">Intel Core i7-8600K</h2><p>The 6C/12T Core i7-8086K is manufactured on Intel's 14nm++ process, just like its other Coffee Lake CPUs. Like the company's Core i7-8700K, its 95W Core i7-8086K also features 13MB of L3 cache, support for up to 64GB of dual-channel memory at DDR4-2666, an unlocked multiplier to facilitate overclocking, and Intel's integrated UHD Graphics 630 engine that can boost up to 1.2 GHz. For more information about the Coffee Lake architecture, check out our <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-coffee-lake-i7-8700k-cpu,5252.html">Core i7-8700K review</a>.</p><div ><table><tbody><tr><td  ><strong>Frequencies</strong></td><td  ><strong>Base</strong></td><td  ><strong>1</strong></td><td  ><strong>2</strong></td><td  ><strong>3</strong></td><td  ><strong>4 - 5</strong></td><td  ><strong>6</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Intel Core i7-8086K</strong></td><td  >4.0 GHz</td><td  >5.0 GHz</td><td  >4.6 GHz</td><td  >4.5 GHz</td><td  >4.4 GHz</td><td  >4.3 GHz</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Intel Core i7-8700K</strong></td><td  >3.7 GHz</td><td  >4.7 GHz</td><td  >4.6 GHz</td><td  >4.5 GHz</td><td  >4.4 GHz</td><td  >4.3 GHz</td></tr></tbody></table></div><p>The -8086K's real differentiation involves its modified Turbo Boost frequencies. But in an effort to maintain a 95W thermal design power rating, Intel only increased this chip's base clock rate by 300 MHz. Intel also increased the single-core clock rate to 5 GHz. We were able to sustain 5 GHz in tasks confined to a single core, such as Cinebench and LAME. However, the busy scheduling environment in a modern desktop operating system, which finds threads migrating frequently between cores, prevented 5 GHz operation in even mainstream tests like our gaming benchmarks. In other words, don't expect to see 5 GHz very often.</p><div ><table><tbody><tr><td  ><strong>Product</strong></td><td  ><strong>Core i7-8086K</strong></td><td  ><strong>Core i7-8700K</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Socket</strong></td><td  >LGA 1151v2</td><td  >LGA 1151v2</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>TDP</strong></td><td  >95W</td><td  >95W</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Architecture</strong></td><td  >Coffee Lake</td><td  >Coffee Lake</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Process</strong></td><td  >14nm++</td><td  >14nm++</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Cores/Threads</strong></td><td  >6 / 12</td><td  >6 / 12</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Frequency Base / Boost</strong></td><td  >4.0 / 5.0 GHz</td><td  >3.7 / 4.7 GHz</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Memory Speed</strong></td><td  >DDR4-2966</td><td  >DDR4-2966</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Memory Controller</strong></td><td  >Dual-Channel</td><td  >Dual-Channel</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Cache (L2+L3)</strong></td><td  >13.5MB</td><td  >13.5MB</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Integrated Graphics</strong></td><td  >UHD Graphics 630 (up to 1200 MHz)</td><td  >UHD Graphics 630 (up to 1200 MHz)</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>PCIe Lanes</strong></td><td  >x16 Gen3</td><td  >x16 Gen3</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Price</strong></td><td  >$425</td><td  >$359</td></tr></tbody></table></div><p>We've heard reports that some motherboards don't support Intel's 5 GHz single-core Turbo Boost bin. However, updated firmware could fix that in the future. Regardless, it's a shame that Intel didn't port over Turbo Boost 3.0 technology to pin lightly-threaded tasks to the CPU's fastest core. Overclockers might have more luck coaxing higher clock rates from the -8086K: our sample easily stretched up to 5.1 GHz with a bit of extra voltage.</p><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:1510px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:74.97%;"><img id="" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/yK4YKhRW9FUt7ym99H2FrB.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/yK4YKhRW9FUt7ym99H2FrB.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="1510" height="1132" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/yK4YKhRW9FUt7ym99H2FrB.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><p>We normally don't cover processor packaging, but it is relevant given the Core i7-8086K's status as a collector’s item. Like all of Intel's K-series SKUs, the -8086K doesn't include a bundled heat sink or fan.</p><p>The box tell us us that this is a limited-edition CPU. Intel even includes a certificate of authenticity, along with a signed statement from former CEO Brian Krzanich.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="forty-years-of-x86">Forty Years Of x86</h2><p>Compared to the 16-bit 8086, Intel's Core i7-8086K represents a quantum leap in technology. Whereas a modern CPU can spend four years in the design process, Intel brought its 8086 to market in just 18 months. Stephen Morse, then 36 years old, was the lead architect. The 8086 was originally designed to be a filler product before Intel released the 8800, but Morse designed it to be the first in a line of chips that shared a common architecture to ensure forward compatibility.</p><div ><table><tbody><tr><td  ><strong>Product</strong></td><td  ><strong>Intel 8086</strong></td><td  ><strong>Core i7-8086K</strong></td><td  ><strong>Core i7-8700K</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Release Date</strong></td><td  >June 8, 1978</td><td  >June 8, 2018</td><td  >October 5, 2017</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>TDP</strong></td><td  >1W (power draw)</td><td  >95W</td><td  >95W</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Cores / Threads</strong></td><td  >1 / 1</td><td  >6 / 12</td><td  >6 / 12</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Frequency Base / Boost</strong></td><td  >5 - 10 MHz (0.005 GHz)</td><td  >4.0 / 5.0 GHz</td><td  >3.7 / 4.7 GHz</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Transistors</strong></td><td  >29,000</td><td  >~3 billion</td><td  >~3 billion</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Manufacturing Process</strong></td><td  >nMOS/HMOS 3 micron (3000nm)</td><td  >CMOS 14nm++</td><td  >CMOS 14nm++</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Word Size</strong></td><td  >16-bit</td><td  >64-bit</td><td  >64-bit</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Lithography</strong></td><td  >G-Line (Mercury Arc Lamps) 436nm Wavelength</td><td  >Argon Fluoride Excismer Laser, 193nm Wavelength</td><td  >Argon Fluoride Excismer Laser, 193nm Wavelength</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Die Size</strong></td><td  >33mm2</td><td  >149mm2</td><td  >149mm2</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Minimum Feature Size</strong></td><td  >3.2 Microns (3200nm)</td><td  >8nm</td><td  >8nm</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Wafer Diameter</strong></td><td  >4 inches</td><td  >12 inches</td><td  >12 inches</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Memory Support</strong></td><td  >1MB</td><td  >64GB</td><td  >64GB</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Memory Bus Speed</strong></td><td  >4.77 MHz</td><td  >2966 MHz</td><td  >2966 MHz</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Integrated Graphics</strong></td><td  >None</td><td  >UHD Graphics 630</td><td  >UHD Graphics 630</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Socket</strong></td><td  >40-pin</td><td  >LGA 1151v2</td><td  >LGA 1151v2</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Price</strong></td><td  >$86.65 (1978) $330 adjusted for inflation</td><td  >$425</td><td  >$359</td></tr></tbody></table></div><p>And thus, the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86">x86 instruction set architecture</a> was born. Over the course of 40 years, Intel continually <a href="https://newsroom.intel.com/editorials/x86-approaching-40-still-going-strong/">enhanced the x86 ISA</a>, adding more than 3500 new instructions like MMX, SSE, TSX, and three flavors of AVX, among many others. Amazingly, the 64-bit Core i7-8086K is capable of running original 16-bit 8086 code. That's a testament to the x86 instruction set's longevity.</p><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:1510px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:74.97%;"><img id="" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/FviQd7asC8WWKSuKG2FMva.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/FviQd7asC8WWKSuKG2FMva.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="1510" height="1132" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/FviQd7asC8WWKSuKG2FMva.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><p>The original 8086 was fabbed on a 3200nm nMOS process using mercury arc lamps. Meanwhile, 40 years later, Intel is on its third-gen 14nm CMOS process that's manufactured with argon fluoride exerciser lasers.</p><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:406px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:93.84%;"><img id="" name="" alt="8086 Die" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/7z6HBdCNjTtTKV6Ev3GpuE.png" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/7z6HBdCNjTtTKV6Ev3GpuE.png" align="" fullscreen="1" width="406" height="381" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/7z6HBdCNjTtTKV6Ev3GpuE.png' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div><figcaption itemprop="caption description" class="pull-"><span class="caption-text">8086 Die </span></figcaption></figure><p>Transistor measurements are no longer based strictly on feature sizes, but we can derive some basic comparative metrics. Die sizes have increased from the 8086's 33mm<sup>2</sup> to the -8086K's 149mm<sup>2</sup>, and transistor counts are up from 29,000 to ~3,000,000,000 per processor, respectively. That means the original 8086 featured 879 transistors per square millimeter, while Core i7-8086K comes with 20,134,228 transistors per square millimeter for an astounding 22,905x density increase.</p><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:1510px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:66.89%;"><img id="" name="" alt="Coffee Lake Die" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/7KmmRcvrdb62Yk3Cw69Qfe.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/7KmmRcvrdb62Yk3Cw69Qfe.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="1510" height="1010" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/7KmmRcvrdb62Yk3Cw69Qfe.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div><figcaption itemprop="caption description" class="pull-"><span class="caption-text">Coffee Lake Die </span></figcaption></figure><p>Interfaces have also changed as Intel added more cores, cache, new buses, expanded memory support, and on-die graphics. The original 8086 dropped into a 40-pin quasi-PGA interface, whereas the eighth-generation Core processors employ an LGA 1151v2 socket that boasts 1151 pins. If we widen the scope to Intel's 28-core enterprise behemoths, some interfaces pack a whopping 4637 pins.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="silicon-lottery-overclocking-amp-test-setup">Silicon Lottery, Overclocking & Test Setup</h2><p>Alternately, <a href="https://siliconlottery.com/">Silicon Lottery</a> procures batches of processors and delids them to replace Intel's thermal paste with liquid metal Thermal Grizzly Condoctonaut. According to the company, this reduces operating temperatures by 15°C to 25°C, depending on the workload. The improved thermal transfer material helps facilitate more aggressive overclocks. Silicon Lottery sells the modified processors at a premium price, and with a one-year warranty (rather than Intel's standard three-year coverage).</p><div ><table><tbody><tr><td  colspan="4"><strong>Core i7-8700K - December 2017</strong></td><td  colspan="4"><strong>Core i7-8700K - June 2018</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Clock</strong></td><td  ><strong>Vcore</strong></td><td  ><strong>AVX2</strong></td><td  ><strong>Percentile</strong></td><td  ><strong>Clock</strong></td><td  ><strong>Vcore</strong></td><td  ><strong>AVX2</strong></td><td  ><strong>Percentile</strong></td></tr><tr><td  >4.9 GHz</td><td  >1.387</td><td  >-2</td><td  >Top 99%</td><td  >4.9 GHz</td><td  >1.385</td><td  >-2</td><td  >Top 99%</td></tr><tr><td  >5.0 GHz</td><td  >1.4</td><td  >-2</td><td  >Top 72%</td><td  >5.0 GHz</td><td  >1.4</td><td  >-2</td><td  >Top 86%</td></tr><tr><td  >5.1 GHz</td><td  >1.412</td><td  >-2</td><td  >Top 43%</td><td  >5.1 GHz</td><td  >1.41</td><td  >-2</td><td  >Top 50%</td></tr><tr><td  >5.2 GHz</td><td  >1.425</td><td  >-2</td><td  >Top 16%</td><td  >5.2 GHz</td><td  >1.425</td><td  >-2</td><td  >Top 17%</td></tr><tr><td  >5.3 GHz</td><td  >1.437</td><td  >-2</td><td  >Top 3%</td><td  >5.3 GHz</td><td  >-</td><td  >-</td><td  >-</td></tr></tbody></table></div><p>Silicon Lottery compiles statistics about the samples it modifies and shares them publicly, giving us a reasonable gauge of what's coming out of Intel's foundries. Some enthusiasts speculate that reserving the highest-quality silicon for Core i7-8086K would hurt the chances of scoring a higher-clocking -8700K. But as we can see, the percentage of -8700Ks able to hit anywhere from 5 to 5.2 GHz actually increased during the period of time we would have expected Intel to set aside top-binned dies for its -8086K. Then again, it looks like samples able to hit 5.3 GHz disappeared entirely, possibly representing those precious -8086K-capable dies.</p><div ><table><tbody><tr><td  colspan="4"><strong>Core i7-8086K - June 2018</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Clock</strong></td><td  ><strong>Vcore</strong></td><td  ><strong>AVX2</strong></td><td  ><strong>Percentile</strong></td></tr><tr><td  >5.0 GHz</td><td  >1.4</td><td  >-2</td><td  >Top 100%</td></tr><tr><td  >5.1 GHz</td><td  >1.41</td><td  >-2</td><td  >Top 92%</td></tr><tr><td  >5.2 GHz</td><td  >1.425</td><td  >-2</td><td  >Top 60%</td></tr><tr><td  >5.3 GHz</td><td  >1.435</td><td  >-2</td><td  >Top 14%</td></tr></tbody></table></div><p>Silicon Lottery also shares statistics on the Core i7-8086K, and its probability of receiving top silicon is markedly better than what we see from the latest round of Core i7-8700K data. Nearly all of the company's -8086Ks reach 5 GHz, and the top 14% are capable of reaching 5.3 GHz.</p><p>Our own Core i7-8086K achieved 5.1 GHz with a 1.35V Vcore and default load line calibration settings. In addition, we adjusted our AVX offset by -1 and saw a peak temperature of 86°C during AVX-heavy workloads using Corsair's beefy H115i closed-loop cooler. Although we successfully dialed in DDR4-3466 rates with 14-14-14-24 timings, we feel we could have pushed even higher with more time for tuning.</p><p>Instead of splurging on a Core i7-8086K, you could always purchase a modified Core i7-8700K from Silicon Lottery capable of hitting the same 5.1 GHz that we achieved. Unfortunately, <a href="https://siliconlottery.com/collections/coffeelake">those models sell for $479</a>, making the -8086K's $425 price tag attractive in comparison. If you're chasing the highest overclock possible, the company does sell a Core i7-8086K capable of 5.3 GHz for $849. As with all Silicon Lottery chips, however, you lose two years of warranty coverage in the exchange. </p><h2 id="comparison-products-3">Comparison Products </h2>        <div class="featured_product_block featured_block_hero" data-id="a5d63b34-468d-4f2d-8d1a-3e5f8bf6d6fe">            <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Intel-i7-8700-Desktop-Processor-BX80684i78700/dp/B07598HLB4?ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback" data-model-name="Core i7-8700" data-model-brand="" ><div class='product-image-widthsetter'><p class='vanilla-image-block' data-bordeaux-image-check style='padding-top:113.36%';><img style="width: 100%" class="featured_image" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/2MbHEgWse822su7gxLadzY.jpg" alt=""></p></div></a>            <div class="featured_product_details_wrapper">                <div class="featured_product_title_wrapper">                                                                                <div class="featured__title">Intel Core i7-8700 (8th Gen)</div>                                    </div>                <div class="subtitle__description">                                                            <p> </p>                </div>                            </div>        </div>        <div class="featured_product_block featured_block_hero" data-id="e3441ee6-54f3-4972-82f2-9ea74550af5a">            <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/https://www.amazon.com/Intel-BX80684I78700K-Core-i7-8700K-Processor/dp/B07598VZR8/?tag=bom_tomshardware-20&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback" data-model-name="Core i7-8700K" data-model-brand="" ><div class='product-image-widthsetter'><p class='vanilla-image-block' data-bordeaux-image-check style='padding-top:122.29%';><img style="width: 100%" class="featured_image" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/j7KjsgaP5iuRZ7RRqGYQTc.jpg" alt=""></p></div></a>            <div class="featured_product_details_wrapper">                <div class="featured_product_title_wrapper">                                                                                <div class="featured__title">Intel Core i7-8700K</div>                                    </div>                <div class="subtitle__description">                                                            <p> </p>                </div>                            </div>        </div>        <div class="featured_product_block featured_block_hero" data-id="c45931a0-40e6-460f-a785-2a8ec6b9ec31">            <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/https://www.amazon.com/Intel-Desktop-Processor-i7-7700K-BX80677I77700K/dp/B01MXSI216/?tag=bom_tomshardware-20&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback" data-model-name="Core i7-7700K" data-model-brand="" ><div class='product-image-widthsetter'><p class='vanilla-image-block' data-bordeaux-image-check style='padding-top:116.01%';><img style="width: 100%" class="featured_image" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/HQW27ndzgmBQPigVEZcckG.jpg" alt=""></p></div></a>            <div class="featured_product_details_wrapper">                <div class="featured_product_title_wrapper">                                                                                <div class="featured__title">Intel Core i7-7700K</div>                                    </div>                <div class="subtitle__description">                                                            <p> </p>                </div>                            </div>        </div><h2 id="test-systems">Test Systems</h2><p>Like many other vendors, MSI motherboards feature a default Enhanced Turbo feature that allows the processor to run at its maximum Turbo Boost bin on all cores, at all times. For the Core i7-8086K, you're looking at 5 GHz across all six cores.</p><p>This setting modifies the CPU's clock rate and voltage to deliver higher performance, which is basically factory-sanctioned overclocking. Again, MSI enables it by default in the BIOS, similar to most of the competition. But performance, power consumption, and heat are all affected when it's on. We manually disable the feature for our stock CPU testing to best reflect Intel's specifications.</p><div ><table><tbody><tr><td  colspan="2"><strong>Test System & Configuration</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Hardware</strong></td><td  ><strong><strong>AMD Socket AM4 (400-Series)</strong></strong>AMD Ryzen 7 2700, Ryzen 7 2700X, Ryzen 5 2600X, Ryzen 5 2600 MSI X470 Gaming M7 AC2x 8GB G.Skill FlareX DDR4-3200 @ DDR4-2933, DDR4-3466<strong>Intel LGA 1151 (Z370):</strong>Intel Core i7-8086K, Core i7-8700K, Core i5-8600K, Core i5-8400, Core i7-8700MSI Z370 Gaming Pro Carbon AC2x 8GB G.Skill FlareX DDR4-3200 @ DDR4-2400, DDR4-2667, DDR4-3466<strong>All</strong> EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 FE 1TB Samsung PM863 SilverStone ST1500-TI, 1500W Windows 10 Creators Update Version 1703 - All Spectre and Meltdown mitigations</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Cooling</strong></td><td  >Corsair H115iIntel stock thermal solution (Core i7-8700)</td></tr></tbody></table></div><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="vrmark-3dmark-amp-aots-escalation">VRMark, 3DMark & AotS: Escalation</h2><h2 id="vrmark-amp-3dmark">VRMark & 3DMark </h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/5xaMxzvHv97sY3NhprZjBJ.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/WxtUqMiSGu2zVhDJ2vUy45.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/HajByWabAxxGtftq8KvTgd.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>Out of the box, Core i7-8086K effectively tied Intel's Core i7-8700K in the DX12 CPU benchmark. But its higher overclocked frequency outstripped the tuned -8700K by a decent margin. Both processors traded places in the DX11 test, though again, overclocking propelled Core i7-8086K past the -8700K.</p><p>VRMark found the -8086K and -8700K offering virtually the same performance at stock and overclocked settings. The Core i5-8600K and -8400 both beat the Core i7 models though, suggesting that this benchmark rewards configurations without simultaneous multi-threading technology exposing logical cores. </p><h2 id="ashes-of-the-singularity-escalation-3">Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/YgFiTWN73MPFGweP34msxS.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/G2qTyQqWgtk5rJvLnCYnqN.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/6m9AiLK3KF6jaA3v7R8Gv8.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>At stock and overclocked settings, Core i7-8086K and the Core i7-8700K performed almost identically in <em>Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation</em>.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="civilization-vi-graphics-amp-ai-dawn-of-war-iii">Civilization VI Graphics & AI, Dawn of War III</h2><h2 id="civilization-vi-ai-test-2">Civilization VI AI Test</h2><p><em>Civilization's </em><span>AI test measures performance in a turn-based strategy game and tends to favor per-core performance.</span></p><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:711px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:75.11%;"><img id="" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ScZTMWXExEgpM6yQAxTEMo.png" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ScZTMWXExEgpM6yQAxTEMo.png" align="" fullscreen="1" width="711" height="534" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ScZTMWXExEgpM6yQAxTEMo.png' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><p>At stock settings, the Core i7-8086K surprisingly trailed Core i7-8700K and -8700, though just barely. Overclocking provides a minuscule boost over the other tuned Intel processors.</p><h2 id="civilization-vi-graphics-test-2">Civilization VI Graphics Test</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/y7ZmpzN9HsJbRwaUgrgwK7.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/bjd4Z89DbqohS5LLtZeXLf.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/p6HAHP6Df4sStjTnwGHWMn.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>Core i5-8600K dominated at both stock and overclocked settings, which tells us that this benchmark prefers physical cores over logical resources. The overclocked Core i7-8086K fell next in line with a lead over competing Core i7 and Ryzen 7 models. However, it trailed the -8700 by 1 FPS on average at stock settings.</p><h2 id="warhammer-40-000-dawn-of-war-iii-3">Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War III</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/7iyMEmV4mwmRPXixCTL34b.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/RBxFxPgMDBzag4H578hTyT.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/r6Hh6dbgGPGBoRawjDV6sE.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p><em>Dawn of War</em> responds well to Intel's high clock rates, so it was no surprise to find overclocked Coffee Lake-based CPUs at the top of our chart.</p><p>Although the overclocked Core i7-8086K landed in first place, it's clear that the outcome in <em>Dawn of War III</em> was limited by graphics performance up top.</p><p>A stock Core i7-8086K beat the -8700K. But the difference between them was so small that the -8086K's 300 MHz peak Turbo Boost advantage didn't seem to help much.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="far-cry-primal-gta-v-amp-hitman">Far Cry Primal, GTA: V & Hitman</h2><h2 id="far-cry-primal">Far Cry Primal</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/PPmzvwSetJ4BvqE2Y5eriY.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/eyyY9SLBydGnsohaf2YXVK.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/DNZH2ULc3oiNjcQRCfvs9U.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>Tuning provided small average frame rate boosts to Intel's six-core Coffee Lake-based CPUs. Meanwhile, Core i7-8086K only offered a slight advantage versus the less expensive eighth-gen Core i7s. </p><h2 id="grand-theft-auto-v-3">Grand Theft Auto V</h2><p><em>Grand Theft Auto V</em><span> </span>favors Intel architectures and, more generally, multi-core designs with high clock rates.</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/vvKFBATDART93bGntHZfM6.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/v9GE5kfxsnK3vAr6HPXi28.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/5DkFnXiACCven6A6Yk8pVe.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>The stock and overclocked Core i7-8086K yielded a small advantage over the Core i7-8700K.</p><h2 id="hitman-3">Hitman </h2><p>Our <em>Hitman</em> benchmark was rendered almost useless by a patch that imposed a 90 FPS cap on performance. A few weeks ago, though, a subsequent update restored our <em>Hitman </em>test to its prior glory.</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/aFFwdp88rVaGtrMAoT6ZAS.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/WpLpTRL5zuFVvCF2vvAeh6.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/SMkCG676yxZcN5RxBPdwY5.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>With the frame cap removed, Intel's overclocked processors hit a performance ceiling that may be imposed by available graphics horsepower.</p><p>Shifting focus to the stock configurations, Intel's six-core CPUs were clearly faster than last generation's quad-core flagship.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="shadow-of-war-amp-project-cars-2">Shadow Of War & Project CARS 2</h2><h2 id="middle-earth-shadow-of-war-3">Middle-earth: Shadow Of War</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/npXBMHrmKrZvijozNfC2rW.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/7ihkTrKazQQoXDYrwTgLY7.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/gSNbi425cFUpWdNv6cEgVM.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>Not all games respond to increased host processing resources; some of them are wholly limited by available graphics horsepower. <em>Middle-earth: Shadow of War</em> is definitely one of those graphics-bound titles, demonstrating a 4.5 FPS average variance from the slowest sample in our pool to the fastest. As a result, it was no surprise to see Core i7-8086K and -8700K tied.</p><h2 id="project-cars-2-3">Project CARS 2</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/x2emu5MRshVmwF29gNbXW6.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/NMUmYuqo7FkXBFLcc6oMwh.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/E5uTa3yfpo7VrRVoo9tS3a.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p><em>Project CARS 2</em> is purportedly optimized for threading. However, our 6C/6T Core i5-8600K beat the overclocked 8C/16T Ryzen 7 2700X, so it's clear that parallelism isn't the most influential factor in defining this game's performance.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="office-amp-productivity">Office & Productivity</h2><h2 id="adobe-creative-cloud-3">Adobe Creative Cloud</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/fdqoxJQpFoCv5wWcUJY8PD.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/rirgzDKTrUi44Sc6op7msT.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/RQmGTyYSjh5WqotHBb7Vu9.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/JYsq7LqR2DBMN7iarjx7a6.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/RQJL4f5RbAGP3f6uuqudAK.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/wRUQDtqHfyRidTDdoTpTw9.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>At stock settings, Core i7-8086K offered minimal improvement over the Core i7-8700K in our overall Adobe Creative Cloud score. Even though this suite has a few parallelized workloads, the final score is heavily influenced by the lightly-threaded tasks common in most desktop applications. So, it wasn't surprising to see the Core i7-8086K's superior overclock beat the tuned -8700K by 6.5%.</p><h2 id="web-browser-3">Web Browser</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/GECqG3DJQj4BGeYdZNRFn7.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/CJjH5QE9Bwo4QbmVmtmSFW.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/SD4h2HNEKEJUxqCUKhZL5n.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>The Krakken suite tests JavaScript performance using several workloads, including audio, imaging, and cryptography. Core i7-8086K trailed the -8700K in stock form, though overclocking changed the story.</p><p>The MotionMark benchmarks, which emphasize graphics (rather than JavaScript), are exceedingly sensitive to CPU clock rates. Yet, Intel's stock Core i7-8086K trailed the -8700K again, reinforcing our opinion that some motherboard firmware versions aren't fully optimized to exploit the 5 GHz single-core Turbo Boost bin.</p><h2 id="productivity-3">Productivity</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/SKaZhJcSLhr8sPUk7ZjUkK.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/KD9NEWTc4yNQ4jhxtg2EMb.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/sKvTMpyi8kfTWLkfWBGmrG.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/JQvCkizAR8cmR7XdeiekzC.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/UeyufAM3FR6F5bYVpQmfk3.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>The application start-up metric measures load time snappiness in word processors, GIMP, and Web browsers under warm- and cold-start conditions. Other platform-level considerations affect this test as well, including the storage subsystem. Core i7-8086K exploited its clock rate advantage in stock and overclocked trim to provide snappy performance.</p><p>Our video conferencing suite measures performance in single- and multi-user applications that utilize the Windows Media Foundation for playback and encoding. It also performs facial detection to model real-world usage. Core i7-8700 beat the -8086K by a hair; however, its locked multiplier prevents it from vying for chart-topping performance. Core i7-8086K posted a lead at stock frequencies during the writing benchmark, reinforcing that win after overclocking.</p><p>The photo editing benchmark measures performance with Futuremark's binaries using the ImageMagick library. Common photo processing workloads also tend to be parallelized, so it's no surprise the tuned Ryzen 7 processors lead by a large margin. The overclocked Core i7-8086K fared best among Intel's CPUs, but there's no substitute for core/thread count in this workload. </p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="rendering-encoding-amp-compression">Rendering, Encoding & Compression</h2><h2 id="rendering-3">Rendering</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/UbQeFuhsqiSfAfjV79udiK.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/3kQfEEysSBjKDWyccLppgN.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ozp6fGNKEmUSdEUBzK4m8B.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/e4JQh6oG2n7BWT7uaei7Zo.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/YuHJtBTMcT8kFJdknwnWUU.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/b6noq8w8SGnaNfahEzDFa6.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/QDFUzUtByY6dRqHurKMaG.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/Ti8hFXEjE6rojZzHPnfffT.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/9PnRNeqXerhEAAiHSryxXV.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>Threaded workloads remain an uncontested strength of AMD's Zen-based processors and their hefty core counts. But tasks that are also affected by memory performance, such as Blender, allow Core i7 to claim a lead. The multi-core Cinebench and POV-Ray tests are dominated by the Ryzen line-up.</p><p>At stock settings, Core i7-8086K lead the -8700K in our single-core POV-Ray and Cinebench benchmarks. Overclocking opened up  a much wider gap between the two CPUs.</p><h2 id="encoding-amp-compression-2">Encoding & Compression </h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/Sd3uPRXjUceivsmvBCG89n.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/wi7MTphzYfHMF4dLfPYG5D.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ZwAQKN4xQFtLNb9zoPgiGH.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/mMyEFGa2HaLrYt52rwk9q3.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/MWoEF7nFLDM2MhyKYqFvk7.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/jJ2fQRm83BRkRcb2SZH3Go.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/cKni5D9S3b8dpnZZGbRFLe.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>LAME is a single-threaded workload that typically illustrates the advantage of higher clock rates and IPC throughput. Not surprisingly, then, Core i7-8086K's frequency advantage lead to a win.   </p><p>Our threaded compression and decompression tests work directly from system memory, removing storage throughput from the equation. Thus, we found that performance scaled according to core/thread count.</p><p>y-cruncher, a single- and multi-threaded program that computes pi using AVX instructions, kept itself isolated to one core during our single-threaded test, allowing the Core i7-8086K to flaunt its higher frequency relative to the -8700K. Conversely, the multi-threaded y-cruncher test reminded us that both processors have the same multi-core Turbo Boost frequencies.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="final-analysis">Final Analysis</h2><p>Core i7-8086K's higher base and single-core Turbo Boost frequencies delivered small speed-ups throughout our test suite. But because of Windows' busy nature, those gains were somewhat unpredictable. Although the -8086K rarely stayed in its single-core Turbo Boost bin for long, the same can be said for most CPUs. Regardless, Core i7-8086K earns recognition for becoming the fastest gaming processor on the market, if only just barely.</p><p>Our charts below plot gaming performance with a geometric mean of the 99<sup>th</sup> percentile frame times (a good indicator of smoothness) converted into a frame-per-second measurement. We also have price-to-performance charts that get split up to include the CPUs-only, plus extra platform costs. For the models that don't come with a bundled cooler, we add $25 for a basic heat sink. We also add $20 if overclocking requires a more expensive motherboard (as is the case for Z370).</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/jwPkwZUnzAMEqXknk62S7Z.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/7tEr9E5bJmzXXyDsd2wuDf.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/8zzXYz2bv4CJR59mCEgsK9.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/YSPwXK8bFFFwh7sFDhJ2XT.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/cau935DSVbdSQfvBRtprEJ.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/thZZuMkCFTCRAt7fPxD8B6.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/4S652R834fsSfdzKJBZKAR.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/uPZv6SFwB44UubmDxRw3TL.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>If you're only looking to use Core i7-8086K at its stock settings, the processor provides nearly the same gaming experience as the Core i7-8700K at 4.9 GHz. Its advantage is minor at 1920x1080, and it'll shrink at higher resolutions. Granted, overclocking is one of the -8086K's selling points. But the extra 200 MHz you get compared to our -8700K just doesn't justify a $75-higher price tag. And as with all K-series SKUs, you need to buy your own cooler and 300-series motherboard.</p><p>We see similar trends throughout our application tests: Core i7-8086K is strikingly similar to the -8700K, and overclocking opens a slight advantage due to our sample's increased headroom. It's only a shame that Intel didn't have the margins to also improve Core i7-8086K's multi-core Turbo Boost frequencies. Such a move would have yielded bigger gains across the board.</p><p>You could always purchase a delidded Core i7-8700K, or do the risky work yourself, to match the -8086K's overclocking potential. But if you go the Silicon Lottery route, expect to pay even more than a brand new Core i7-8086K costs and lose two years of warranty coverage.</p><p>Core i7-8086K is probably overkill for most of our readers. Both Intel and AMD have far more economical options that provide similar performance through our benchmark suite. Given the limited supply of Core i7-8086Ks, however, we don't expect them to be available for long, and competitive positioning probably isn't the top priority for this CPU's target market.</p><p>In light of the anecdotal evidence we've heard from Silicon Lottery, you can rest assured that the -8086K represents Intel's very best Coffee Lake silicon. There are those among us who always seek out the best performance possible, regardless of price. If that describes you, then Core i7-8086K is the fastest gaming chip out there. Just be aware that you're paying dearly for a bit of overclocking headroom.</p><p>Moderate gains at stock clock rates mean Core i7-8086K isn't worthwhile for most of Intel's customers. But if you're willing to pay a premium for a piece of history that just so happens to perform well, the -8086K is a cool, enthusiast-oriented option.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ Intel Core i7-8700 Review: Stock Cooler Falls Flat ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-core-i7-8700-cpu-review,5638.html</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ Intel's Core i7-8700 sports all of the goodness expected from its Coffee Lake architecture. However, the bundled cooler proves insufficient under taxing workloads. ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">MFk5YJ6csdyi57qrLRMs43</guid>
                                                                                                <enclosure url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/NDEcMPLn9dLq3UHbvGCiR9-1280-80.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="0"></enclosure>
                                                                        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2018 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                <updated>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 15:30:17 +0000</updated>
                                                                                                                                            <category><![CDATA[CPUs]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[PC Components]]></category>
                                                                                                <author><![CDATA[ palcorn@outlook.com (Paul Alcorn) ]]></author>                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Paul Alcorn ]]></dc:creator>                                                                                    <dc:source><![CDATA[ https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/RZRmFeQfPy3etHjBQitbGW.jpeg ]]></dc:source>
                                                                <dc:description><![CDATA[ &lt;p&gt;As a teenager, Paul scraped up enough money to buy a 486-powered PC with a turbo button (yes, a turbo button). Back when floppies were still popular he was already chasing after the fastest spinners for his personal computer, which led him down the long and winding storage road, covering enterprise storage. His current focus is on consumer processors, though he still keeps a close eye on the latest storage news. In his spare time, you’ll find Paul hanging out with his kids or indulging his love of the Kansas City Chiefs and Royals.&lt;/p&gt; ]]></dc:description>
                                                                                                                                <cf:isSponsored>false</cf:isSponsored>
                <cf:hasAffiliateLinks>false</cf:hasAffiliateLinks>
                <cf:isPaid>false</cf:isPaid>
                                                                                                                                <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/NDEcMPLn9dLq3UHbvGCiR9-1280-80.jpg">
                                                            <media:credit><![CDATA[null]]></media:credit>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </media:content>
                                                    <media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/NDEcMPLn9dLq3UHbvGCiR9-1280-80.jpg" />
                                                                                                                                                                    <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <h2 id="the-core-i7-8700-review">The Core i7-8700 Review</h2><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:1280px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:113.36%;"><img id="" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/2MbHEgWse822su7gxLadzY.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/2MbHEgWse822su7gxLadzY.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="1280" height="1451" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/2MbHEgWse822su7gxLadzY.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><p>Intel's Core i7-8700 packs all of the Coffee Lake architecture's goodness into a 65W envelope, including six Hyper-Threaded cores, the benefits of 14nm++ manufacturing, and higher Turbo Boost clock rates than previous-generation CPUs. Although it's handicapped somewhat by a locked ratio multiplier, stymieing enthusiasts looking for a 5 GHz+ overclock, Core i7-8700 does feature operating frequencies that come close to the flagship -8700K. As a result, its performance is often similar in real-world tasks. And yet, the vanilla -8700 costs $50 less. That's a win if you weren't planning to overclock anyway.</p><p>Great benchmark results and an attractive price also put Core i7-8700 up against AMD's revamped Ryzen 7 line-up. Specifically, it's forced to contend with Ryzen 7 2700's eight cores, 16 threads, unlocked multiplier, affordable motherboard support, and capable cooler. Particularly on that last point, Intel's solution is severely deficient.</p><p>You see, Intel's thermal design power specification applies to the CPU's base frequency. But its processors exceed that rating when they jump to higher Turbo Boost bins. We found that the Core i7-8700 can overwhelm Intel's bundled heat sink and fan during certain heavily-threaded workloads, negatively affecting performance. You'll have to purchase a better thermal solution for any chance at realizing Core i7-8700's highest Turbo Boost frequencies. Naturally, the CPU loses some of its luster as a result.</p><h2 id="intel-core-i7-8700">Intel Core i7-8700</h2><p>Core i7-8700 may be destined to live <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-coffee-lake-i7-8700k-cpu,5252.html">in the -8700K's shadow</a>. But again, it does feature the same complement of six cores, 12MB of L3 cache, and DDR4-2666-capable memory controller. Like all of Intel's Core i7, i5, and i3 models, the i7-8700 comes with an integrated UHD Graphics 630 engine that gives Intel a leg up over competing Ryzen 7 and 5 processors without any on-die graphics.</p><p>Unfortunately, due to Coffee Lake's lack of backward compatibility, <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-coffee-lake-i7-8700k-cpu,5252-2.html">you do need a 300-series motherboard</a> if you're upgrading from an older platform.</p><div ><table><tbody><tr><td  ></td><td  ><strong>IntelCore i7-8700K</strong></td><td  ><strong>IntelCore i7-8700</strong></td><td  ><strong>AMD Ryzen 7 2700X</strong></td><td  ><strong>AMD Ryzen 7 2700</strong></td><td  ><strong>AMD Ryzen 5 2600X</strong></td><td  ><strong>Intel Core i5-8600K</strong></td><td  ><strong>AMD Ryzen 5 2600</strong></td><td  ><strong>Intel Core i5-8400</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>MSRP</strong></td><td  >$359</td><td  >$303</td><td  >$329</td><td  >$299</td><td  >$229</td><td  >$257</td><td  >$199</td><td  >$182</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Process</strong></td><td  >14nm++</td><td  >14nm++</td><td  >GloFo 12nm LP</td><td  >GloFo 12nm LP</td><td  >GloFo 12nm LP</td><td  >14nm++</td><td  >GloFo 12nm LP</td><td  >14nm++</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Cores/Threads</strong></td><td  >6/12</td><td  >6/12</td><td  >8/16</td><td  >8/16</td><td  >6/12</td><td  >6/6</td><td  >6/12</td><td  >6/6</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>TDP</strong></td><td  >95W</td><td  >65W</td><td  >105W</td><td  >65W</td><td  >95W</td><td  >95W</td><td  >65W</td><td  >65W</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Base Freq. (GHz)</strong></td><td  >3.7</td><td  >3.2</td><td  >3.7</td><td  >3.2</td><td  >3.6</td><td  >3.6</td><td  >3.4</td><td  >2.8</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Precision Boost Freq. (GHz)</strong></td><td  >4.7</td><td  >4.6</td><td  >4.3</td><td  >4.1</td><td  >4.2</td><td  >4.3</td><td  >3.9</td><td  >4.0</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Cache (L3)</strong></td><td  >12MB</td><td  >12MB</td><td  >16MB</td><td  >16MB</td><td  >16MB</td><td  >9MB</td><td  >16MB</td><td  >9MB</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Unlocked Multiplier</strong></td><td  >Yes</td><td  >No</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >No</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Integrated Graphics</strong></td><td  >UHD Graphics 630 (1200 MHz)</td><td  >UHD Graphics 630 (1200 MHz)</td><td  >No</td><td  >No</td><td  >No</td><td  >UHD Graphics 630 (1150 MHz)</td><td  >No</td><td  >UHD Graphics 630 (1150 MHz)</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Cooler</strong></td><td  >No</td><td  >Intel Stock</td><td  >105W Wraith Prism (LED)</td><td  >95W Wraith Spire (LED)</td><td  >95W Wraith Spire</td><td  >No</td><td  >65W Wraith Stealth</td><td  >Intel Stock</td></tr></tbody></table></div><p>Intel is infamous for aggressively segmenting its portfolio, meaning it trims frequencies, only makes overclocking available on premium models, turns Hyper-Threading on and off, and disables cores to create lower-priced models. Of course, the company did this with its seventh-gen Core CPUs, too. The Core i7-7700 was multiplier-locked, while the -7700K catered to enthusiasts. But Intel capped the -7700's top Turbo Boost bin at a mere 4.2 GHz. Core i7-8700 isn't as constrained. Its four-core ceiling is 4.4 GHz, while six active cores reach up to 4.3 GHz, just like Core i7-8700K. In most workloads, the 500 MHz base frequency difference between Core i7-8700 and -8700K quickly disappears as Turbo Boost kicks in.</p><div ><table><tbody><tr><td  ><strong>Frequencies</strong></td><td  ><strong>Base</strong></td><td  ><strong>1</strong></td><td  ><strong>2</strong></td><td  ><strong>4</strong></td><td  ><strong>6</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Intel Core i7-8700K</strong></td><td  >3.7 GHz</td><td  >4.7 GHz</td><td  >4.6 GHz</td><td  >4.4 GHz</td><td  >4.3 GHz</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Intel Core i7-8700</strong></td><td  >3.2 GHz</td><td  >4.6 GHz</td><td  >4.5 GHz</td><td  >4.4 GHz</td><td  >4.3 GHz</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Intel Core i7-7700K </strong></td><td  >4.2 GHz</td><td  >4.5 GHz</td><td  >4.4 GHz</td><td  >4.4 GHz</td><td  >-</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Intel Core i7-7700</strong></td><td  >3.6 GHz</td><td  >4.2 GHz</td><td  >4.1 GHz</td><td  >4.0 GHz</td><td  >-</td></tr></tbody></table></div><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="the-stock-cooler-dilemma-amp-test-setup">The Stock Cooler Dilemma & Test Setup</h2><h2 id="the-stock-cooler-dilemma">The Stock Cooler Dilemma</h2><p>Intel ships its multiplier-locked CPUs with basic thermal solutions. Although they are notoriously flimsy and usually pretty noisy, they've proven sufficient for cooling previous-generation models. That changes with Core i7-8700.</p><p>In the not-too-distant past, Intel's stock heat sink employed a copper core. More recently, however, the company switched to all-aluminum designs. That means Core i7-8700 comes with the same cooler as quad-core Kaby Lake-based Core i5s.</p><p>Frankly, we're surprised that Intel carried over the same heat sinks from those seventh-generation Core CPUs. Despite the -8700's 65W TDP, it's still based on a notably more complex die.</p><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:1510px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:74.97%;"><img id="" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/XZ7NVUwa8kQLEGCqnxfxqA.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/XZ7NVUwa8kQLEGCqnxfxqA.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="1510" height="1132" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/XZ7NVUwa8kQLEGCqnxfxqA.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><p>On paper, the -8700's 65W TDP fits nicely within the low-profile cooler's 73W rating. But remember that Intel specs the CPU's thermal design power according to its base frequency. Its chips actually exceed the TDP when they dynamically increase voltage and frequency through their Turbo Boost algorithms. As noted on <a href="https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/architecture-and-technology/turbo-boost/turbo-boost-technology.html">Intel's Turbo Boost 2.0</a> informational page:</p><p>Note: Intel Turbo Boost Technology 2.0 allows the processor to operate at a power level that is higher than its TDP configuration and data sheet specified power for short durations to maximize performance.</p><p>According to our measurements, Core i7-8700 peaks at up to 126W during taxing all-core workloads. With that data in-hand, the stock cooler does appear insufficient. </p><p>While Intel guarantees base frequencies during normal operation, the company doesn't make promises about Turbo Boost clock rates because its processors only shift to higher P-states (pre-defined frequencies and voltages) when they're running below certain temperature, voltage, power, and current limits. Above them, the opportunistic algorithms are reigned in to keep the CPU in-spec.</p><p>As a general rule, Turbo Boost targets lower frequency bins as more cores become active. Intel does still advertise its maximum single-core clock rates, but it no longer divulges the multi-core clock rates (even though you can expose them through the company's XTU software).</p><div ><table><tbody><tr><td  ><strong>Frequencies</strong></td><td  ><strong>Base</strong></td><td  ><strong>1</strong></td><td  ><strong>2</strong></td><td  ><strong>4</strong></td><td  ><strong>6</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Intel Core i7-8700K</strong></td><td  >3.7 GHz</td><td  >4.7 GHz</td><td  >4.6 GHz</td><td  >4.4 GHz</td><td  >4.3 GHz</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Intel Core i7-8700</strong></td><td  >3.2 GHz</td><td  >4.6 GHz</td><td  >4.5 GHz</td><td  >4.4 GHz</td><td  >4.3 GHz</td></tr></tbody></table></div><p>We've seen lots of speculation that Intel stopped disclosing multi-core Turbo Boost frequencies with Coffee Lake-based processors because its stock heat sink and fan couldn't fully facilitate those clock rates. Sure enough, a quick online search reveals several reports from owners claiming that their Core i7-8700s hit the maximum safe temperature of 100<strong>°</strong>C (TJ Max) during extended workloads. Once the processor reaches TJ Max, it throttles back voltage and frequency (along with power and heat) as a protection mechanism. Of course, throttling also results in lower performance.</p><h2 id="measuring-the-impact">Measuring The Impact</h2><p>To investigate the claims, we observed a Core i7-8700 and its stock cooler during our x265 HandBrake benchmark. This real-world application is optimized to utilize all available cores. Moreover, it employs AVX instructions, which tend to increase power consumption considerably. We opened AIDA's system stability test window to monitor our -8700 during the workload.</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/qarQKyPomUTg6836YDEBQh.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/h9V9io7hjyR8rg2WJoCi3D.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>As you can see in the second slide, Intel's cooler was quickly overwhelmed, causing the processor to repeatedly bounce off of its 100<strong>°</strong>C temperature limit and throttle performance to protect itself (charted in red in the lower window). </p><p>With the bundled fan manually set to 100% duty cycle, we logged frequency throughout our test run (first album image). Even with the thermal solution working as hard as possible, the -8700 regularly throttled back from its 4.3 GHz all-core bin into lower ranges.</p><p>We also monitored VRM temperature during the test to ensure our motherboard's power delivery subsystem wasn't responsible for the throttling. Those measurements landed within the range we expected.</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/uaAGfHGLw8LmgZCU96pr3h.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/SU6xH8AVCgJvkL9xwZsJgn.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>Next, we ran the same test using a beefy Corsair Hydro Series H115i "Extreme Performance" all-in-one liquid-cooler. Manually cranking the two 140mm fans and pump up to 100% helped ensure that thermal output had no impact on our test results.</p><p>The difference is night and day. Intel's Core i7-8700 never exceeded 67<strong>°</strong>C, and the processor's frequency remained at a pleasingly-constant 4.3 GHz (though we did notice a few spikes higher during brief periods of lighter utilization). AIDA's system monitor confirmed that the CPU didn't throttle. Again, we see that our motherboard's power delivery subsystem satisfied the Core i7-8700's power and current requirements.</p><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:1113px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:74.84%;"><img id="" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/iE7DrQhCRrFxt9EpU7rpg7.png" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/iE7DrQhCRrFxt9EpU7rpg7.png" align="" fullscreen="1" width="1113" height="833" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/iE7DrQhCRrFxt9EpU7rpg7.png' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><p>Comparing the difference between Intel's stock cooler (HS&F) and the all-in-one makes it clear that thermals clearly affect the -8700's performance. Turbo Boost is clearly designed to minimize the impact of thermal throttling: we only observe a 72-second delta over the course of our ~35-minute test.</p><p>A mere 3.4% separating those results may seem insignificant, but remember that we tested these configurations on an open test bench. A closed case would change the outcome almost assuredly. Also, we benchmarked at maximum fan settings, generating quite a bit of noise. It's far more common to use the motherboard's default fan curve, or to dial in an optimized fan profile that ramps up gradually. Unfortunately, those algorithms don't respond to control temperature fast enough to mitigate wild spikes and dips. As a result of the normal delay in fan speed adjustments, plus the less-than-ideal airflow in most PC cases, you could see larger slow-downs than what we recorded from a best-case test environment. This doesn't bode well for builders working with small form factors.</p><p>We did experiment with various thermal compounds between the stock cooler and heat spreader, but they didn't help much. Thus, we pin the negative outcome of our experimentation on Intel's paltry heat sink and fan combination.</p><p>Bear in mind that our benchmarks are run with the stock cooler and Corsair's all-in-one to highlight the difference in thermal performance. Some tests are short, while others take longer to complete. Some are single-threaded, while other are fully parallelized. Thus, the effects of heat influence each result in a unique way. As noted, we kept the fan speed at maximum and tested on an open-air bench, so our results represent a best-case scenario for Intel's stock cooler.</p><h2 id="comparison-products-4">Comparison Products </h2>        <div class="featured_product_block featured_block_hero" data-id="59b4646b-b972-46e2-bb57-d9d1783c4b1e">            <a href="http://www.tkqlhce.com/click-8900246-12920453?sid=tomshardware-&url=https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819117824" data-model-name="Core i5-8400" data-model-brand="" ><div class='product-image-widthsetter'><p class='vanilla-image-block' data-bordeaux-image-check style='padding-top:108.91%';><img style="width: 100%" class="featured_image" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/Mbp7fKeJrnqTAagSTBP399.jpg" alt=""></p></div></a>            <div class="featured_product_details_wrapper">                <div class="featured_product_title_wrapper">                                                                                <div class="featured__title">Intel Core i5-8400</div>                                    </div>                <div class="subtitle__description">                                                            <p> </p>                </div>                            </div>        </div>        <div class="featured_product_block featured_block_hero" data-id="c9731c4d-2a95-4963-8301-45bb0d40da2b">            <a href="http://redirect.viglink.com?key=6c0b046b3e0ec746fbbe9b03fac3f09b&u=https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819117825" data-model-name="Core i5-8600K" data-model-brand="" ><div class='product-image-widthsetter'><p class='vanilla-image-block' data-bordeaux-image-check style='padding-top:120.30%';><img style="width: 100%" class="featured_image" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ovaurhrrbXkvAC9XyKvdJU.jpg" alt=""></p></div></a>            <div class="featured_product_details_wrapper">                <div class="featured_product_title_wrapper">                                                                                <div class="featured__title">Intel Core i5-8600K</div>                                    </div>                <div class="subtitle__description">                                                            <p> </p>                </div>                            </div>        </div>        <div class="featured_product_block featured_block_hero" data-id="5c31c6c2-1253-41d1-9061-0aecff1ca373">            <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/https://www.amazon.com/Intel-BX80677I77700-Processor-Frequency-Generation/dp/B01N0L41N7/?tag=bom_tomshardware-20&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback" data-model-name="Core i7-7700" data-model-brand="" ><div class='product-image-widthsetter'><p class='vanilla-image-block' data-bordeaux-image-check style='padding-top:100.00%';><img style="width: 100%" class="featured_image" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/BQZAGGZvsQUun8kc84LKzK.jpg" alt=""></p></div></a>            <div class="featured_product_details_wrapper">                <div class="featured_product_title_wrapper">                                                                                <div class="featured__title">Intel Core i7-7700</div>                                    </div>                <div class="subtitle__description">                                                            <p> </p>                </div>                            </div>        </div><h2 id="test-systems-2">Test Systems</h2><div ><table><tbody><tr><td  colspan="2"><strong>Test System & Configuration</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Hardware</strong></td><td  ><strong><strong>AMD Socket AM4 (400-Series)</strong></strong>AMD Ryzen 7 2700, Ryzen 7 2700X, Ryzen 5 2600X, Ryzen 5 2600 MSI X470 Gaming M7 AC2x 8GB G.Skill FlareX DDR4-3200 @ DDR4-2933, DDR4-3466<strong>Intel LGA 1151 (Z370):</strong>Intel Core i7-8700K, Core i5-8600K, Core i5-8400, Core i7-8700MSI Z370 Gaming Pro Carbon AC2x 8GB G.Skill FlareX DDR4-3200 @ DDR4-2400, DDR4-2667, DDR4-3466<strong>All</strong> EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 FE 1TB Samsung PM863 SilverStone ST1500-TI, 1500W Windows 10 Creators Update Version 1703 - All Spectre and Meltdown mitigations</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Cooling</strong></td><td  >Corsair H115iIntel stock thermal solution (Core i7-8700)</td></tr></tbody></table></div><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="vrmark-3dmark-amp-aots-escalation-2">VRMark, 3DMark & AotS: Escalation</h2><h2 id="vrmark-amp-3dmark-2">VRMark & 3DMark </h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/VEKniHxU7qtwWMPFFmmv7e.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/GvBapntFe8zDm63qp4ozsa.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/WgWTBs7uBmJahVeWKsSeRE.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>Core i7-8700 fell right where we expected it to in VRMark: slightly below the stock Core i7-8700K.</p><p>AMD's Ryzen 7 2700X was a little faster though, as was the Core i5-8400. VRMark tends to reward high IPC throughput and frequency, but it also seems to prefer physical cores over simultaneous multi-threading technology.</p><p>Although the Core i7-8700 outstripped its K-series counterpart in the Fire Strike test, its lead isn't significant enough to call a definitive win. The heavily-threaded DX11 and DX12 benchmarks ran for an extended period of time. But frequent breaks in the sequence likely helped Core i7-8700 maintain the same level of performance under Intel's stock cooler and Corsair's Corsair H115i.</p><h2 id="ashes-of-the-singularity-escalation-4">Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/CxKXw4ujKkvfbokR79QrhQ.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/rsFac9YPvuthUTCY5RVMrV.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/RbtxzKSJdyQCtJzfhqvQNk.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>Our three-minute <em>Ashes of the Singularity</em> benchmark scales exceedingly well with additional cores, so it was surprising to see Core i7-8700 perform similarly with both thermal solutions.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="civilization-vi-graphics-amp-ai-dawn-of-war-iii-2">Civilization VI Graphics & AI, Dawn of War III</h2><h2 id="civilization-vi-ai-test-3">Civilization VI AI Test</h2><p><em>Civilization's </em><span>AI test measures performance in a turn-based strategy game and tends to favor per-core performance.</span></p><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:1112px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:74.91%;"><img id="" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/b7A632zbJ4wuL66z9pyZxd.png" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/b7A632zbJ4wuL66z9pyZxd.png" align="" fullscreen="1" width="1112" height="833" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/b7A632zbJ4wuL66z9pyZxd.png' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><p>In our Core i7-8700K review, we pointed out that Intel's vanilla -8700 often outperformed the flagship -8700K in our gaming benchmarks. Obviously, those results were difficult to explain, given each CPU's specifications. But the issue persisted for several months (and many motherboard firmware updates). Intel and its motherboard partners have been unable to explain this phenomenon. However, we did notice that it was resolved around the time updates went out for our <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-5-2600x,5579.html">Spectre/Meltdown patch testing</a>. We still saw a few scattered cases of Core i7-8700 beating the flagship K-series chip, but they're typically results that fall within a margin of error.</p><p>Our <em>Civilization VI</em> AI test results are a perfect example. The Core i7-8700 with Corsair's cooler slipped past the Core i7-8700K, but just barely. More important is that you can get -8700K-class performance from the locked model if you don't plan on overclocking.</p><h2 id="civilization-vi-graphics-test-3">Civilization VI Graphics Test</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/XNveByisj6FNyrmAc39mKn.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/rCLstL9RfQ5WbtaCJSmhLm.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/iNYnVCJ4ZykiTQyYEBYpvW.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>The <em>Civilization VI</em> graphics test shows Intel's Core i7-8700 beating the -8700K by a larger margin. In fact, strong performance put the -8700 on equal footing with a tuned Ryzen 7 2700X, and within striking distance of the overclocked Core i7-8700K.</p><p>Separately, we saw the Core i7-7700K about 6 FPS ahead of the -7700. This illustrates the bigger gap between Intel's previous-gen locked and K-series models, attributable to large differences in base and Turbo Boost frequencies. </p><h2 id="warhammer-40-000-dawn-of-war-iii-4">Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War III</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/WjmPnRMQevWexDNk9XUvDd.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/fqBj8Vb67waRJDMoup3pyJ.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/CPwRChdMoGUUk8ZHuJHN3Y.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>Core i7-8700 almost kept up with the stock -8700K. But tuning Intel's flagship Coffee Lake-based CPU solidified its lead.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="far-cry-primal-gta-v-amp-hitman-2">Far Cry Primal, GTA: V & Hitman</h2><h2 id="far-cry-primal-2">Far Cry Primal</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ubmRHHaZNUZBnvKAb25TLL.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/SKbN9isDLmQK4mg5PDYfiX.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/oAyyYBDbTVPxkLoadom3QN.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p><em>Far Cry Primal </em>obviously runs well on quad-core processors, and doesn't gain much from architectures with more execution resources. Meanwhile, a big gap between the Core i7-7700K and -7700 tells us that the game is sensitive to operating frequencies, too.</p><p>Core i7-8700 and -8700K were nearly indistinguishable through this benchmark run.</p><p>AMD's Ryzen CPUs appear to fare worse than the Intel chips in <em>Far Cry Primal</em>. Average frame rates can be misleading, though. Our frame time charts reveal much more performance variability from the Core processors. Ryzen 7 2700X's nice clean line is indicative of a smoother experience.</p><h2 id="grand-theft-auto-v-4">Grand Theft Auto V</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/b2KUCZi4KttnovfYprbZDB.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/cVQTpPQWRcqRpED73mgunC.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/csvxBGC8W9pKYxhszV3ejW.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>The <em>Grand Theft Auto V</em> benchmark we use is one of our suite's longest in terms of run time. We record 100 seconds of the fly-by scene, first allowing the preceding sequences to run through and keep our hardware nice and toasty for consistent measurements.</p><p>Even though Intel's stock heat sink and fan finished in front of the -8700 cooled by Corsair's closed-loop H115i, the results fell within the range we anticipate between tests.</p><h2 id="hitman-4">Hitman </h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/qZuDPczFv9F76qmToLQ3RF.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/kJNJPqUbin6ujnTzrCBfae.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/5vvMDezMRWyLnMMTcmaK9h.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>Our <em>Hitman</em> benchmark found the Core i7-8700 and -8700K pretty much tied. Both models are ~4 FPS ahead of the nearest Ryzen CPU.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="shadow-of-war-amp-project-cars-2-2">Shadow Of War & Project CARS 2</h2><h2 id="middle-earth-shadow-of-war-4">Middle-earth: Shadow Of War</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/chQBmNBT37d94jkyNzJ5U5.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/WE76LptaoYW8ZKEhTMuyQj.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/jXhVrkrFcJaLSbWeCAnmpn.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p><em>Middle-earth</em> didn't respond any better to our six-core Coffee Lake-based samples than it did to their quad-core predecessors. Sometimes you just need more graphics horsepower.</p><h2 id="project-cars-2-4">Project CARS 2</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/KynHiBhcDe2WWVyMiwCqKi.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/Ji3UPWRHzAEGnQ7JS9Qmpc.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/FYwEaQkDEZETtsXGZzkYF.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>According to its developers, <em>Project CARS 2</em><span> is well-optimized for multi-core CPUs. But a 6C/6T Core i5-8600K beat the overclocked 8C/16T Ryzen 7 2700X, so it's clear that threading isn't the most influential variable in determining this game's performance. <br/></span></p><p><span>The stock Core i7-8700K established a slight lead over the -8700 in our benchmark, although overclocking increased its advantage. More than likely, though, the top of this chart is graphics-bound.<br/></span></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="office-amp-productivity-2">Office & Productivity</h2><h2 id="adobe-creative-cloud-4">Adobe Creative Cloud</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/asaoJtkLgXUdvAEaNn8VyG.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/7pjWThdXbg23RukxVrqHqJ.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ZQrkrjkQvV2Jmvgbeqhdsk.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/AEhyVNY6rrdJPWUch4eRHf.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/d4TfoWh9ewcTwGEyFdFZH6.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/DzexvMp9dujtiPNJoEHS9Q.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>Core i7-8700 with its stock heat sink lost some ground to Corsair's closed-loop liquid cooler in the Illustrator test. Otherwise, there was little to differentiate both configurations.</p><p>The stock Core i7-8700K barely beat Core i7-8700 in our aggregate score. However, overclocking the K-series chip to 4.9 GHz propelled it into a second-place finish (after Core i5-8600K, interestingly enough).</p><h2 id="web-browser-4">Web Browser</h2><p>The Meltdown and Spectre patches imposed performance penalties on Intel CPUs through our Web browser tests. However, Core processors still lead through these lightly-threaded benchmarks.</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/JXgSHogVds3HFGcgAaN8C9.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/bhXe8BNcYDtAsoKAd3bNUP.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/udPMgSPdoYza8HVanmyna3.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>The Krakken suite tests JavaScript performance using several workloads, including audio, imaging, and cryptography. AMD's Ryzen 7 2700X slid in ahead of Core i7-8700, reminding us that second-gen Ryzen CPUs are much more competitive than their predecessors in workloads that aren't well-optimized for parallelization.</p><p>MotionMark emphasizes graphics performance, rather than JavaScript, but is also sensitive to CPU clock rates. There, Core i7-8700 turned things around and beat the Ryzen 7 2700X. We weren't expecting a stock Core i7-8700K to carve out such a large advantage over the vanilla -8700, though.</p><h2 id="productivity-4">Productivity</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/nUquHz2DkcdHGVJqXtQPVj.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/g3Ea4QyKZ6dmFWxBaxuqPR.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/oQRN3sxn8n3ZsEVHFbcFZW.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/z7R6babiWLPGsnznegxGHj.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/iPb3thUAMEMUoKXqAonDGA.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>The application start-up metric measures load time snappiness in word processors, GIMP, and Web browsers under warm- and cold-start conditions. Core i7-8700 impressed in this benchmark by barely beating a stock -8700K. But the benefit of an unlocked K-series chip became evident in the Core i5-8600K and Core i7-8700K results at 4.9 GHz.</p><p>Our video conferencing suite measures performance in single- and multi-user applications that utilize the Windows Media Foundation for playback and encoding. It also performs facial detection to model real-world usage. This workload is parallelized, so it responds well to Ryzen's core count advantage. Nevertheless, a six-core design with Hyper-Threading allowed Core i7-8700K to muscle out the competition when we overclocked it to 4.9 GHz.</p><p>The photo editing benchmark measures performance with Futuremark's binaries using the ImageMagick library. Common photo processing workloads also tend to be parallelized, so the Ryzen processors took an uncontested lead.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="rendering-encoding-amp-compression-2">Rendering, Encoding & Compression</h2><h2 id="rendering-4">Rendering</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/g8qUsiEoMZJK3hxzZ5dFzf.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/b5NaAk5hVqEU2a9vVvPcbg.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/kbdhCULwf7Zz8qyxzCSq3C.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/cGPMHQBYNNrcQsJxwGn4SF.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/7KWYSZYqJM5ABRteqcofYY.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/WnRbmn3BuynrwKA6T2WiVa.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/gR6zPiofWSJ2J8J7ZiuR7d.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/QvrxqTsTrnNxpqmHh9H33C.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/4yeMVzqwBSMWjuDFYpG4Ve.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>We expected to see more variation from Intel's stock cooler during our Cinebench multi-core test. Given its relatively short run time and our open-air bench, however, we didn't see much difference between our two configurations. Interestingly, the stock Core i7-8700K and -8700 performed almost identically.</p><p>Similar trends emerged through the other threaded rendering tasks. While Core i7-8700's stock heat sink and fan imposed slightly lower performance than the liquid cooler in certain cases, we still think the -8700 is a solid alternative to the pricier flagship if you don't plan to overclock and cooling inside your case is sufficient.</p><h2 id="encoding-amp-compression-3">Encoding & Compression </h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/9zUNrEaeoJ3wRokgVpELCb.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/qH7s4mhAJrutx8x9xvGSk7.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/iE7DrQhCRrFxt9EpU7rpg7.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/aaLmH7ce8aFfkNQMkvMCxC.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/Pa3Fppb85bsyVVft2xvSyD.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/GLoMLMAucJEkNp9daKa2SZ.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/qmfiPbgna78P3ZFnHH6Xxb.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>LAME is a single-threaded workload that typically illustrates the advantage of higher clock rates and IPC throughput. Case in point: Core i7-7700K and -7700 were separated by a larger delta than the two Coffee Lake-based Core i7s, which we know feature similar single-core Turbo Boost bins.</p><p>Our threaded compression and decompression tests work directly from system memory, removing storage throughput from the equation. These workloads are especially intensive. Yet, we didn't record any surprising variations between the -8700 cooled by Intel's stock thermal solution and the Corsair all-in-one. Both of our HandBrake benchmarks, on the other hand, exploit AVX instruction, generate lots of heat, and illustrate a wider performance gap between the two configurations.</p><p>Surprisingly, y-cruncher, a single- and multi-threaded program that computes pi using AVX instructions, didn't expose any variation between the two coolers we tested atop Core i7-8700.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="final-analysis-2">Final Analysis</h2><p>Intel made some significant changes to the Coffee Lake architecture in order to keep its Core CPUs competitive with AMD's Ryzen line-up. Beyond giving the Core i7 family six Hyper-Threaded cores, Intel also narrowed the clock rate difference between premium K-series chips and the more mainstream models. Core i7-8700K does boast a 500 MHz base frequency advantage over Core i7-8700. But that gap shrinks as Turbo Boost is enabled and more cores spin up. By the time four cores are active, both chips <em>should </em>sustain 4.4 GHz.</p><p>Unfortunately, the decision to bundle Core i7-8700 with an all-aluminum heat sink means that you may not always get the chip's most aggressive Turbo Boost frequencies under taxing workloads. You'd assume that a CPU with 50% more cores would also dissipate more heat than its predecessor. And yet Intel didn't think to include a cooling solution with enough thermal headroom to realize its peak performance. This is especially perplexing given the praise AMD received for packaging its processors with beefy heat sinks.</p><p>Most of the time, though, Core i7-8700 does deliver an experience that closely mirrors the flagship -8700K at its stock settings. Check out the charts below, which plot gaming performance with average frame rates and a geometric mean of the 99<sup>th</sup> percentile frame times (a good indicator of smoothness) converted into a frame-per-second measurement. We also have price-to-performance charts that get split up to include the CPUs-only, plus extra platform costs. For the models that don't come with a bundled cooler, we add $25 for a basic heat sink. We also add $20 if overclocking requires a more expensive motherboard (as is the case for Z370).</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/qLYpXJkfcz9zweUpRSNcgG.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/u5kVNoZmnEKuSjPRUcP6Yo.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/nB4sdR4EyLSNvcw3MAGWnG.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/kgxZX4D4kMqwzsRUEGDQ4F.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/CF32fQ9SKT9eEWwisRGSXN.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/wTUBQwMUAVTDhdD4mCPr76.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/bAgVVZQymTaf8X8wjJFDwW.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/dbmxzEiJWC7MZC2nhjnYf7.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>For those similar performance results, expect to spend about $50 less on a Core i7-8700. If you game at higher resolutions, the differences between CPUs shrink even more. And the -8700 looks a lot like a stock -8700K through most of our other application benchmarks, too.</p><p>Intel doesn't have a great track record for building backward compatibility into its platforms, so you are on the hook for a new 300-series motherboard, regardless of what you're stepping up from. But unless specific features of the Z370 chipset catch your eye, Core i7-8700 offers the exact same performance if you drop it onto a cheaper B-series board. That should save a few extra dollars...</p><p>...which you'll want to turn around and spend on a better thermal solution than what Intel includes with its -8700. That heat sink and fan combination is obviously a poor fit, and better thermal paste won't fix the issue. By stepping up to a sufficient third-party cooler, you won't have to worry about artificially clipping the -8700's top-end Turbo Boost bins due to overheating. A six-core, Hyper-Threaded CPU rated for 65W sounds great for performance-sensitive applications in small form factors. But power consumption definitely spikes higher under load. Apparently, many low-profile coolers lack the headroom for Core i7-8700, so do your homework before replacing the stock sink in a space-constrained environment.</p><p>In the past, we recommended Ryzen 7 2700X over Intel's Core i7-8700K due to AMD's lower price point, similar gaming performance, bundled cooler, and better benchmark results in threaded applications. We expected Core i7-8700's comparable performance and pricing advantage to level the field. However, Intel's sub-standard cooling solution means we can't recommend the -8700 without a suitable replacement, adding to the CPU's overall cost.</p><p>AMD's Ryzen 7 2700 is also worth considering in this category. Its unlocked ratio multiplier and overclocking support on B-series motherboards yields a more attractive value story than what we get from Core i7-8700. Of course, if you need integrated graphics with your high-end CPU, Intel is the only game in town. And if you're looking for the best blend of price and performance for gaming specifically, the Core i5-8400 is still a favorite.  </p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ AMD Ryzen 5 2600 CPU Review: Efficient And Affordable ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-5-2600,5625.html</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ AMD's Ryzen 5 2600 pushes six execution cores into a $200 price point. But it's only $20 less expensive than the 95W Ryzen 5 2600X. As a result, Ryzen 5 2600's 65W TDP seems to be the CPU's main differentiator. ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">QwFHBsLs275MayDtb2yiye</guid>
                                                                                                <enclosure url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/Vkx4FRsMSxK67dNG4ac689-1280-80.png" type="image/png" length="0"></enclosure>
                                                                        <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                <updated>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 15:30:44 +0000</updated>
                                                                                                                                            <category><![CDATA[CPUs]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[PC Components]]></category>
                                                                                                <author><![CDATA[ palcorn@outlook.com (Paul Alcorn) ]]></author>                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Paul Alcorn ]]></dc:creator>                                                                                    <dc:source><![CDATA[ https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/RZRmFeQfPy3etHjBQitbGW.jpeg ]]></dc:source>
                                                                <dc:description><![CDATA[ &lt;p&gt;As a teenager, Paul scraped up enough money to buy a 486-powered PC with a turbo button (yes, a turbo button). Back when floppies were still popular he was already chasing after the fastest spinners for his personal computer, which led him down the long and winding storage road, covering enterprise storage. His current focus is on consumer processors, though he still keeps a close eye on the latest storage news. In his spare time, you’ll find Paul hanging out with his kids or indulging his love of the Kansas City Chiefs and Royals.&lt;/p&gt; ]]></dc:description>
                                                                                                                                <cf:isSponsored>false</cf:isSponsored>
                <cf:hasAffiliateLinks>false</cf:hasAffiliateLinks>
                <cf:isPaid>false</cf:isPaid>
                                                                                                                                <media:content type="image/png" url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/Vkx4FRsMSxK67dNG4ac689-1280-80.png">
                                                            <media:credit><![CDATA[null]]></media:credit>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </media:content>
                                                    <media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/Vkx4FRsMSxK67dNG4ac689-1280-80.png" />
                                                                                                                                                                    <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <h2 id="six-cores-and-65w-for-200">Six Cores and 65W for $200</h2><p>AMD&apos;s Ryzen 5 2600 boasts six cores and the ability to execute two threads per core, just like the company&apos;s pricier <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-5-2600x,5579.html">Ryzen 5 2600X</a>. But the 2600 operates at lower base and boost frequencies than the X-class model (after all, it&apos;s supposed to be $30 cheaper). Don&apos;t let the dialed-back performance bother you too much though; the 2600 does employ higher clock rates than AMD&apos;s previous-gen <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-5-1600-cpu,5073.html">Ryzen 5 1600</a>. Plus, it features a familiar unlocked ratio multiplier for overclocking. Rest assured that the 2600 is faster than anything AMD has ever sold for $200.</p><p>It&apos;s only a shame that, instead of the 95W cooler AMD bundled with Ryzen 5 1600, the 2600 comes with a 65W Wraith Stealth heat sink/fan combination. Although the attractive thermal solution is fine for stock frequencies, it definitely limits the new chip&apos;s overclocking potential. Value-seekers looking to match Ryzen 5 2600X through a bit of tweaking are bound to be disappointed.</p><p>To make matters worse for Ryzen 5 2600, the 2600X was selling at a discount when we wrote this, shrinking the gap between the two chips to $20. For that small premium, you get more stock performance from the 2600X and a beefier 95W cooler to match its TDP. If you aren&apos;t chasing low power, we think the Ryzen 5 2600X is a worthwhile step up.</p><p>Then again, Ryzen 5 2600 remains a compelling option, for anyone building in a compact case where heat is a primary concern. One of the <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-performance-cpus,5683.html">best cpus for desktop applications</a> at press time, It comes packed with all of architectural improvements inherent to AMD&apos;s Zen+ design, including higher mutli-core boost frequencies than the previous generation, lower memory latency, and GlobalFoundries&apos; 12nm manufacturing process (read our <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-7-2700x-review,5571.html">Ryzen 7 2700X review</a> for additional details).</p><div ><table><tbody><tr><td  ></td><td  >AMD Ryzen 7 2700X</td><td  >AMD Ryzen 7 2700</td><td  >Ryzen 7 1700</td><td  >AMD Ryzen 5 1600X</td><td  >AMD Ryzen 5 2600X</td><td  ><strong>AMD Ryzen 5 2600</strong></td><td  >Ryzen 5 1600</td><td  >Intel Core i7-8700K</td><td  >Intel Core i5-8600K</td><td  >Intel Core i5-8400</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>MSRP</strong></td><td  >$329</td><td  >$299</td><td  >$299</td><td  >$219</td><td  >$229</td><td  >$199</td><td  >$189</td><td  >$359</td><td  >$257</td><td  >$182</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Cores/Threads</strong></td><td  >8/16</td><td  >8/16</td><td  >8/16</td><td  >6/12</td><td  >6/12</td><td  >6/12</td><td  >6/12</td><td  >6/12</td><td  >6/6</td><td  >6/6</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>TDP</strong></td><td  >105W</td><td  >65W</td><td  >65W</td><td  >95W</td><td  >95W</td><td  >65W</td><td  >65W</td><td  >95W</td><td  >95W</td><td  >65W</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Base Freq. (GHz)</strong></td><td  >3.7</td><td  >3.2</td><td  >3.0</td><td  >3.6</td><td  >3.6</td><td  >3.4</td><td  >3.2</td><td  >3.7</td><td  >3.6</td><td  >2.8</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Precision Boost Freq. (GHz)</strong></td><td  >4.3</td><td  >4.1</td><td  >3.8</td><td  >4.0</td><td  >4.2</td><td  >3.9</td><td  >3.6</td><td  >4.7</td><td  >4.3</td><td  >4.0</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Cache (L3)</strong></td><td  >16MB</td><td  >16MB</td><td  >16MB</td><td  >16MB</td><td  >16MB</td><td  >16MB</td><td  >16MB</td><td  >12MB</td><td  >9MB</td><td  >9MB</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Unlocked Multiplier</strong></td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >No</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Cooler</strong></td><td  >105W Wraith Prism (LED)</td><td  >95W Wraith Spire (LED)</td><td  >95W Wraith Spire</td><td  >-</td><td  >95W Wraith Spire</td><td  >65W Wraith Stealth</td><td  >95W Wraith Spire (No LED)</td><td  >-</td><td  >-</td><td  >Intel</td></tr></tbody></table></div><p>All 2000-series Ryzen CPUs are compatible with motherboards sporting new X470 or older 300-series chipsets. You can even overclock the new processors on value-oriented B-series platforms. While lower-cost 400-series chipsets aren't available yet, we're counting on them to offer a more affordable option for enthusiasts looking to tune 2000-series Ryzen CPUs.</p><p>Ryzen 5 2600 supports up to DDR4-2933 memory. Just be aware that you'll only get those data rates with single-rank modules installed in a maximum of two slots. Even then, it takes a motherboard with six PCB layers to operate at 2933 MT/s stably.</p><p>Like all 2000-series models, the Ryzen 5 2600 also comes with <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-fuzedrive-fuzeram-enmotus-ryzen,36368.html">StorMI Technology</a>, which is a software-based tiering solution that blends the low price and high capacity of hard drives with the speed of an SSD, 3D XPoint, or even up to 2GB of RAM.</p><h2 id="precision-boost-2-and-xfr2">Precision Boost 2 And XFR2</h2><p>AMD's previous-gen Ryzen processors included Precision Boost functionality that set higher frequencies under lightly-threaded workloads. They also introduced an eXtended Frequency Range (XFR) feature, which allowed higher clock rates when it was determined that your cooling solution had thermal headroom to spare.</p><p>The new Precision Boost 2 (PB2) and XFR2 algorithms improve performance in threaded workloads by raising the frequency of any number of cores. AMD doesn't share a list of specific multi-core PB2 and XFR2 bins because the opportunistic algorithms accelerate to different clock rates based on temperature, current, and load. However, we collected our measurements on a motherboard with solid voltage regulation circuitry and a good cooler (two requirements for optimal frequencies).</p><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:633px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:74.88%;"><img id="" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/9qrXXLB2zAVnRTYeHY3xaA.png" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/9qrXXLB2zAVnRTYeHY3xaA.png" align="" fullscreen="1" width="633" height="474" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/9qrXXLB2zAVnRTYeHY3xaA.png' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><p>The Ryzen 5 2600 offers a nice performance boost over AMD's previous-gen models. However, it cannot match Ryzen 5 2600X. Compared to that CPU, the 2600 loses 350 MHz with all of its cores utilized. The difference between both models narrows in tasks that use anywhere from one to four cores.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="overclocking-2">Overclocking</h2><p>So far, all of the Ryzen 2000-series CPUs we've tested offer similar overclocking capabilities, albeit with slightly different voltage requirements. We pushed AMD's Ryzen 5 2600 to 4.2 GHz using 1.4V Vcore, 1.2V SoC, and automatic Loadline Calibration (LLC) settings. The bundled heat sink and fan are capable enough if you're only gunning for a moderate overclock. However, it struggled to maintain 4 GHz at 95°C. If you want to match our best effort, top the 2600 with a capable closed-loop liquid cooler.</p><p>Like the other Ryzen 2000-series CPUs we've reviewed, we overclocked this platform's memory (DDR4-3466 at 14-14-14-34 timings) with minimal effort.</p><h2 id="precision-boost-overdrive">Precision Boost Overdrive</h2><p>AMD isn't giving us much detail about its Precision Boost Overdrive feature, though we know it increases maximum boost voltage and boost duration. Nevertheless, we know that Precision Boost Overdrive is an AMD-sanctioned feature. Because this is a standard capability for Ryzen 2000-series processors, we leave it enabled. Conversely, we disable the Multi-Core Enhancement BIOS option found in many Intel-based motherboards because it overclocks beyond the company's specifications.</p><h2 id="msi-x470-gaming-m7-ac">MSI X470 Gaming M7 AC</h2><p><span class="notranslate">Our MSI X470 Gaming M7 AC has a PCI Express 3.0 slot with a x16 link, a slot with a x8 connection, and another PCI Express 2.0 slot with a four-lane link for graphics cards. Its </span><span class="notranslate">four RAM slots support DDR4-2933 and scale quite a bit higher through overclocking.</span></p><p><span class="notranslate">The motherboard also provides two M.2 slots with PCIe connectivity.</span><span class="notranslate"> The I/O panel has a USB 3.1 Type C connector.</span><span class="notranslate"> The </span><span class="notranslate">USB 3.1 and USB 3.1 Gen 2 ports support fast charging for smartphones and tablets.</span><span class="notranslate"> If RGB is your thing, MSI has you covered. T</span><span class="notranslate">he integrated RGB Mystic lighting allows customizable effects with several software-controlled zones.</span><span class="notranslate"><br/></span></p><h2 id="comparison-products-5">Comparison Products </h2>        <div class="featured_product_block featured_block_hero" data-id="44b7f159-8ad6-4691-a3d5-661af12db4a4">            <a href="http://www.tkqlhce.com/click-8900246-12920453?sid=tomshardware-&url=https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819117824" data-model-name="Core i5-8400" data-model-brand="" ><div class='product-image-widthsetter'><p class='vanilla-image-block' data-bordeaux-image-check style='padding-top:108.91%';><img style="width: 100%" class="featured_image" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/Mbp7fKeJrnqTAagSTBP399.jpg" alt=""></p></div></a>            <div class="featured_product_details_wrapper">                <div class="featured_product_title_wrapper">                                                                                <div class="featured__title">Intel Core i5-8400</div>                                    </div>                <div class="subtitle__description">                                                            <p> </p>                </div>                            </div>        </div>        <div class="featured_product_block featured_block_hero" data-id="de26e2ce-5fbe-4d98-94c9-5a6abb27358d">            <a href="http://redirect.viglink.com?key=6c0b046b3e0ec746fbbe9b03fac3f09b&u=https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819117825" data-model-name="Core i5-8600K" data-model-brand="" ><div class='product-image-widthsetter'><p class='vanilla-image-block' data-bordeaux-image-check style='padding-top:120.30%';><img style="width: 100%" class="featured_image" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ovaurhrrbXkvAC9XyKvdJU.jpg" alt=""></p></div></a>            <div class="featured_product_details_wrapper">                <div class="featured_product_title_wrapper">                                                                                <div class="featured__title">Intel Core i5-8600K</div>                                    </div>                <div class="subtitle__description">                                                            <p> </p>                </div>                            </div>        </div>        <div class="featured_product_block featured_block_hero" data-id="04152c56-11a4-4256-bd0a-687e90704f5a">            <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/https://www.amazon.com/Intel-BX80684I78700K-Core-i7-8700K-Processor/dp/B07598VZR8/?tag=bom_tomshardware-20&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback" data-model-name="Core i7-8700K" data-model-brand="" ><div class='product-image-widthsetter'><p class='vanilla-image-block' data-bordeaux-image-check style='padding-top:122.29%';><img style="width: 100%" class="featured_image" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/j7KjsgaP5iuRZ7RRqGYQTc.jpg" alt=""></p></div></a>            <div class="featured_product_details_wrapper">                <div class="featured_product_title_wrapper">                                                                                <div class="featured__title">Intel Core i7-8700K</div>                                    </div>                <div class="subtitle__description">                                                            <p> </p>                </div>                            </div>        </div><h2 id="test-systems-3">Test Systems</h2><div ><table><tbody><tr><td  colspan="2"><strong>Test System & Configuration</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Hardware</strong></td><td  ><strong><strong>AMD Socket AM4 (400-Series)</strong></strong>AMD Ryzen 7 2700, Ryzen 7 2700X, Ryzen 5 2600X, Ryzen 5 2600 MSI X470 Gaming M7 AC2x 8GB G.Skill FlareX DDR4-3200 @ DDR4-2933, DDR4-3466<strong>Intel LGA 1151 (Z370):</strong>Intel Core i7-8700K, i5-8600K, Core i5-8400MSI Z370 Gaming Pro Carbon AC2x 8GB G.Skill FlareX DDR4-3200 @ DDR4-2400, DDR4-2667, DDR4-3466<strong>AMD Socket AM4 (300-Series)</strong>Ryzen 5 1600X, Ryzen 7 1600 MSI X370 Xpower Gaming Titanium2x 8GB G.Skill FlareX DDR4-3200 @ DDR4-2667, DDR4-3200<strong>All</strong> EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 FE 1TB Samsung PM863 SilverStone ST1500-TI, 1500W Windows 10 Creators Update Version 1703 - All Spectre and Meltdown mitigations</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Cooling</strong></td><td  >Corsair H115i</td></tr></tbody></table></div><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="vrmark-amp-3dmark-3">VRMark & 3DMark </h2><p>While synthetic benchmarks scale well with increased host computing resources, those gains don't always translate to real-world gaming performance. Rather, these benchmarks give us a solid measure of theoretical horsepower available to game engines.</p><p>UL's VRMark gauges the system's ability to power leading VR HMDs, and much like many modern game titles, VR tends to favor per-core performance, so frequency and instructions per clock throughput reign supreme.</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/tgsGv47kTiziwtuNN9wNni.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/nhGwJFVdpJw99ANH74cj4V.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/6fcAYutA62h9ANqaf4ArUb.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>A stock Ryzen 5 2600 represents a solid improvement over the previous-gen Ryzen 5 1600. Moreover, tuning pushed it in front of Intel's Core i5-8400. </p><p>We didn't expect record-breaking performance in the DX12 and DX11 CPU tests due to Ryzen 5 1600's six cores. But its ability to execute 12 threads concurrently proves advantageous against Intel's hexa-core Core i5 processors in certain workloads. While Core i7-8700K with Hyper-Threading beat the 2600, Ryzen 5's extra threads cut through those benchmarks better than the comparably-priced Core i5-8400.</p><p>Overclocking helped as well, placing the Ryzen 5 2600 on more competitive footing in both CPU tests.</p><h2 id="ashes-of-the-singularity-escalation-5">Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/AEQLJumU9KJzCuhXXig5UY.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/jKNauYQTHzQbPuNFXxiuUF.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/LpzQnTVzREF8rFa7RRFmsn.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>Ryzen 5 2600 outperformed the Core i5-8600K and -8400 at stock settings. However, all three CPUs delivered similar 99th percentile frame rates, suggesting similar smoothness. Moreover, the Ryzen 5 2600 demonstrated almost identical performance to Ryzen 5 2600X once we took the time to tune it.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="civilization-vi-ai-test-4">Civilization VI AI Test</h2><p><em>Civilization's </em><span>AI test measures performance in a turn-based strategy game and tends to favor per-core performance.</span></p><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:1112px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:74.91%;"><img id="" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/YS8Rr7id6GPWGPH9QApkoE.png" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/YS8Rr7id6GPWGPH9QApkoE.png" align="" fullscreen="1" width="1112" height="833" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/YS8Rr7id6GPWGPH9QApkoE.png' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><p><span>A recent game update added several new features to <em>Civilization VI</em>, but it also invalidated our previous benchmark results. Average turn times increased marginally, and we noticed a few changes to overall hierarchy. This test continues to favor Intel's architectures. <br/></span></p><p><span> Considering the relatively narrow differences between processors, Ryzen 5 1600 lagged the rest of the field by a significant margin. But Ryzen 5 2600 helped rectify the situation at stock settings, going so far as to beat AMD's Ryzen 5 1600X. <br/></span></p><h2 id="civilization-vi-graphics-test-4">Civilization VI Graphics Test</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/o3oUgmzBBVeXBjQUgGuouS.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ciRvmx8VGr8zdWzdM2s2Wa.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/mzxqNLs9oAS2DTJ2jJj2CJ.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>Ryzen 5 2600 averaged almost 7 FPS higher than the previous-gen 1600 thanks to optimized multi-core boost frequencies and lower memory latency. Again, our overclocked Ryzen 5 2600 even beat the tuned 2600X. Meanwhile, Core i5-8400 reminded us that it's plenty fast, despite a locked ratio multiplier preventing meaningful overclocking.</p><h2 id="warhammer-40-000-dawn-of-war-iii-5">Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War III</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/JimTzkniRkA6EoS7GNv45E.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/HuGZuprxenfVMbYg98KCDe.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/G73NZETxoxau2cesaXY4xG.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>The overclocked Ryzen 5 2600 only trailed Core i7-8700K by 2 FPS, which is impressive given the -8700K's $160-higher price tag. Meanwhile, a stock Ryzen 5 2600 beat the Ryzen 5 1600 by an average of 10.4 FPS, quantifying AMD's generational improvements.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="far-cry-primal-3">Far Cry Primal</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/gSYW53vK7W8ZXpV5iv7bxj.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/uZzwM338yhruqwQuhnrh9H.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/oraJRGe2vNoL29xJFCuqXY.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p><em>Far Cry Primal</em> showed Intel's CPU line-up leading again. Interestingly, Ryzen 5 and Core i5 beat Ryzen 7 and Core i7, telling us that this title doesn't benefit from simultaneous multi-threading, but rather is penalized by the technology.</p><h2 id="grand-theft-auto-v-5">Grand Theft Auto V</h2><p><em>Grand Theft Auto V</em><span> </span>favors Intel architectures and, more generally, multi-core designs with high clock rates.</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/mgZMV293xQ3ArUUTKQRbPi.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/EdLqPFupWqNp56dBJSK3z.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ghNNMTpijVJ4p86K3q2Q3g.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>After overclocking, the Ryzen 5 2600 beat Intel's Core i5-8400. At stock settings, though, a lower base frequency caused the chip to trail many of our other test platforms.</p><h2 id="hitman-5">Hitman </h2><p>A few months ago, <em>Hitman</em> received an update that imposed a 90 FPS performance ceiling, limiting its utility as a benchmark. Fortunately for us, IO Interactive recently did away with that cap. So, we retested all of the CPUs in our pool.</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/nG6qAhQ8fJxeFYXXezc5E8.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/Zf2vvsf9ktfcRajauG5fp3.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/fMi4Q58kdjXAWADkagDWz9.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>The benchmark results clearly split between Intel Core (up top) and AMD Ryzen (down below) CPUs. Nevertheless, an overclocked Ryzen 5 2600 achieved similar performance as the tuned 2600X. </p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="middle-earth-shadow-of-war-5">Middle-earth: Shadow Of War</h2><p><em>Middle-earth: Shadow of War</em><span> </span>doesn't scale as well as some of our other benchmarks, and it certainly isn't as sensitive to IPC throughput and clock rate as <em>Shadow of Mordor</em><span>. This serves as a reminder that most games respond better to faster graphics cards. CPUs don't play as large of a role in determining game performance. </span></p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/XR7jSwpabzLe9eKAQfuEBS.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/hb9YsLiUDPPNzCkSkhabtH.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/zQoszkG2fjKMdwMVt9iV3N.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p><span><br/></span></p><p><span>As we can see, though, slower processors can bottleneck graphics cards if the combination isn't balanced well. Ryzen 5 1600 found a spot at the bottom of our results, while AMD's newer Ryzen 5 2600 demonstrated a nice little step up in the benchmark results. <br/></span></p><h2 id="project-cars-2-5">Project CARS 2</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/N73NputsDHKoEc94XC2fxE.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/knBx5ttgxfvoe7Vo2oPQk8.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/4rTVHgB2QMoiZGWdgKWghM.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>Ryzen 5 2600 offers impressive performance, given its $200 price point. But it couldn't quite catch Intel's Core i5-8400 in <em>Project CARS 2</em>, even after overclocking.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="adobe-creative-cloud-5">Adobe Creative Cloud</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/HYmh2N4ypbKnvcVSVsota9.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/HLsbFdHtJVy8rSE95M8cXA.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/UdBqYdoez7NfCNekUcEN5V.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/R3GihSEyMzWP2c6DUKQuSc.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/7iKniqBpvR5cWmrDq4QVYV.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/fwSnePpeNLJUMZhPcUsQeE.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>Ryzen 5 2600 delivered an incredible performance boost compared to its predecessor in our Adobe Creative Cloud suite. With that said, Intel's CPUs still lead through most of these lightly-threaded applications. We also saw larger performance differences between the stock and overclocked Ryzen 5 2600 compared to the 2600X, mostly due to the 2600's lower stock frequencies and similar overclocking limit shared between most Ryzen 2000-series models.</p><p>In the end, a stock Ryzen 5 2600 beat Intel's Core i5-8400 and AMD's Ryzen 7 2700 in the overall score. That's impressive for such a value-oriented chip.</p><h2 id="web-browser-5">Web Browser</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/GZVFfSGCRZhRQq3NNyYahA.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/Cp9HtbeBy5shf65iFUhKdB.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/WKMgn8oQixpf6xkmAYrsHd.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>The Meltdown and Spectre patches imposed performance penalties on Intel's CPUs in our web browser tests. However, they still lead through these lightly-threaded tests.</p><p>AMD's Ryzen 5 2600 easily beat the stock Ryzen 5 1600, which took a last-place finish among the models we benchmarked. As expected, overclocking helped put Ryzen 5 2600 on par with the more expensive Ryzen 5 2600X.</p><h2 id="productivity-5">Productivity</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/nPayDKHbysZ93eLdfWathT.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/HYyEWvmp6yYApeRRSMBQyX.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/Zzngrsr89uvMWjZuA5Qtm8.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/e2WHegX4tgy3Ju95hex75g.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/xk24WcYBDy44YPD9PEBiyA.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>The application start-up metric measures load time snappiness in word processors, GIMP, and Web browsers under warm- and cold-start conditions. Other platform-level considerations affect this test as well, including the storage subsystem. Intel's snappy performance in these lightly-threaded apps put its Core CPUs ahead of the competing Ryzen chips.</p><p>Our video conferencing suite measures performance in single- and multi-user applications that utilize the Windows Media Foundation for playback and encoding. It also performs facial detection to model real-world usage. Cores and threads benefit this workload greatly, so Ryzen 5 2600's six cores naturally fared well.</p><p>The photo editing benchmark measures performance with Futuremark's binaries using the ImageMagick library. Common photo processing workloads also tend to be parallelized, so Ryzen 5 easily beat the Core i5 models.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="rendering-5">Rendering</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/C3iNt3jK6xhLbGhN9b8PDN.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/zxG72Hpk4DUE3Jc43dbS5N.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/TnvEdepWAMBz5VoAQMA9KV.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/pPDyp3Aq6NNsUvvHuJkV2n.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/D6wHRM7UVhjpFmVmhuo2ub.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/7jXgUt4nrxQe6djEVeBx8j.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/GfkDBQkdd6fWrhGpRPL3xG.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/f9UK8XCc28aocPJPcSWin9.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/iWAE2ApGVfVwFfjjTnwkpf.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>AMD's Ryzen 5 2600 at stock settings outperformed the Ryzen 5 1600, but generally lagged the rest of the field in rendering workloads emphasizing single-core performance.</p><p>Switching to heavily-threaded benchmarks helped Ryzen 5 2600 redeem itself, particularly after we overclocked it. Again, the Ryzen 5 2600X operates at higher clock rates out of the box, so it didn't pick up as much performance after tuning.</p><h2 id="encoding-amp-compression-4">Encoding & Compression </h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/HaSua4oFC5o23t6xXm6CZZ.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/5VDgaJcyfAWBpJEwq3Epic.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/uwqvWm95m2uZV7Gs5UD3oZ.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/4uQV8uDxHnx7uEAFkjajt7.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/mBDNe2Wd5ckza9HXd4w8M9.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/LNR8drL2zCNUafdynWfPLS.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/YijR4VfXp7kNPU9q6jJSWM.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>LAME is a quintessential single-threaded workload that typically illustrates Intel's per-clock advantage. The overclocked Ryzen 5 2600 was plenty competitive in this workload though, beating Intel's stock Core i7-8700K.</p><p>Our threaded compression and decompression tests work directly from system memory, removing storage throughput from the equation. Ryzen 5 2600 landed where we expected it to; the CPU's advances over Ryzen 5 1600 are largely related to improved memory performance.</p><p>The x264 HandBrake tests went Intel's way, particularly after we overclocked the Core CPUs. However, the company's multiplier-locked Core i5-8400 couldn't muster enough performance to beat a stock Ryzen 5 2600. Intel's propensity for over-segmenting its portfolio once again proves costly against AMD's more enthusiast-friendly alternatives. Incidentally, Core i5-8400 was much more competitive in the x265 test, which makes greater use of AVX instructions that play well to Intel's architecture.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="final-analysis-3">Final Analysis</h2><p>Much like AMD's attractive Ryzen 5 2600X, the Ryzen 5 2600 proves to be a well-rounded processor that sports many of the same selling points. It's a little bit slower right out of the box, but the 2600 also costs less and boasts a 30W-lower TDP. Similar to the Ryzen 7 2700X versus Ryzen 7 2700 story, you trade a bit of speed for a slightly lower price and a little less heat. They're different tools optimized for different applications. It just so happens that most enthusiasts favor higher benchmark results over a $20 savings or a bit less power consumption.</p><p>In that vein, the charts below plot performance using average frame rates and a geometric mean of the 99<sup>th</sup> percentile frame times, which we then convert into a FPS measurement. We also include price-to-performance charts that get split up to include CPUs-only and extra platform costs. For the models that don't come with a bundled cooler, we add an extra $25 for a basic heat sink. We also add $20 if overclocking requires a more expensive motherboard (as is the case for Z370).</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/mN8Eut3eezdDjNAjhWZDNL.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/wEWikA9wwzMg4GH4YaQ2cd.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/CGhy8uJQyNjRaDHDjV3Jhe.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/H4irSEWMMAPcRPDAoEA44U.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/yF98zfi9PpfQjvjXiqaDM.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/BVSjqPZqFwfibBCWHmg6w8.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/VnZ2gxTBEje3qgnVE9Trzh.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/6ZNRecRZEcxAVRny8ReHwB.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>As our benchmark results suggested, Ryzen 5 2600's overclocked gaming performance is very competitive with a tuned Ryzen 5 2600X, both complemented by GeForce GTX 1080. The 2600 also fares well against Intel's Core i5-8600K, which doesn't come with a thermal solution, requires a Z-series motherboard for overclocking, and still sells for almost $70 more than the AMD chip. If you plan on overclocking, the Core i5-8600K does provide higher frame rates than any other Ryzen 5/Core i5 CPUs. But as you push higher resolutions and more demanding detail settings, the differences between processors shrink.</p><p>Intel's Core i5-8400, the least-expensive model we tested, is an impressive alternative for gaming. Like the Ryzen 5 2600, it comes with a bundled cooler and drops into value-oriented motherboards. As a result, it's priced somewhat similarly. The Core i5-8400 is our favorite choice for gamers on a budget. Although AMD's Ryzen 5 2600 can be faster after overclocking, you'll have to buy a bigger thermal solution to get there.</p><p>While we favor the Core i5-8400 for entertainment, AMD's Ryzen 5 2600 earns its praise in our application suite. Intel does maintain a performance advantage in lightly-threaded tasks. But the Ryzen chip is still competitive across those workloads. Moreover, Ryzen 5 2600's ability to execute 12 threads concurrently helps propel it to victory in more heavily-threaded benchmarks. If you do a lot of video and image processing, rendering, or game streaming, Ryzen 5 2600 should be at the top of your list in this price range.</p><p>With its Ryzen 2000-series, AMD eliminated much of our justification for stepping down to non-X models. The Ryzen 5 2600 we tested today isn't much cheaper, and it doesn't have a monopoly on bundled heat sink/fan combos. Some enthusiasts will favor the lower-end chip's 65W TDP. However, we'd rather spend an extra $20 on a Ryzen 5 2600X, deal with the 95W TDP, and enjoy its additional performance. After all, overclocking the 2600 to compensate for its lower base and boost frequencies requires splurging on a bigger thermal solution. Otherwise, you'll find yourself stuck around 4 GHz.</p><p>On the bright side, Ryzen 5 2600 is a big step up compared to the previous-generation Ryzen 5 1600. Its 6C/12T configuration at 65W is crazy-impressive for compact/low-power workstations, and we have to love all of the avaialable compute performance at a $200 price point.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ AMD Ryzen 2 vs. Intel Coffee Lake: What's the Best CPU Platform? ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-coffee-lake-ryzen-2,5615.html</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ It's the age-old question that has spurred endless debate: AMD or Intel? ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">jPo9drxvkYb7Hdeguq7PF8</guid>
                                                                                                <enclosure url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/QRDSMxsBxphswo5z5Wfxn3-1280-80.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="0"></enclosure>
                                                                        <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                <updated>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 09:52:11 +0000</updated>
                                                                                                                                            <category><![CDATA[CPUs]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[PC Components]]></category>
                                                                                                <author><![CDATA[ palcorn@outlook.com (Paul Alcorn) ]]></author>                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Paul Alcorn ]]></dc:creator>                                                                                    <dc:source><![CDATA[ https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/RZRmFeQfPy3etHjBQitbGW.jpeg ]]></dc:source>
                                                                <dc:description><![CDATA[ &lt;p&gt;As a teenager, Paul scraped up enough money to buy a 486-powered PC with a turbo button (yes, a turbo button). Back when floppies were still popular he was already chasing after the fastest spinners for his personal computer, which led him down the long and winding storage road, covering enterprise storage. His current focus is on consumer processors, though he still keeps a close eye on the latest storage news. In his spare time, you’ll find Paul hanging out with his kids or indulging his love of the Kansas City Chiefs and Royals.&lt;/p&gt; ]]></dc:description>
                                                                                                                                <cf:isSponsored>false</cf:isSponsored>
                <cf:hasAffiliateLinks>false</cf:hasAffiliateLinks>
                <cf:isPaid>false</cf:isPaid>
                                                                                                                                <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/QRDSMxsBxphswo5z5Wfxn3-1280-80.jpg">
                                                            <media:credit><![CDATA[null]]></media:credit>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </media:content>
                                                    <media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/QRDSMxsBxphswo5z5Wfxn3-1280-80.jpg" />
                                                                                                                                                                    <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:804px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:55.97%;"><img id="" name="" alt="Ryzen 2 vs Intel Coffee Lake" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/QRDSMxsBxphswo5z5Wfxn3.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/QRDSMxsBxphswo5z5Wfxn3.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="804" height="450" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/QRDSMxsBxphswo5z5Wfxn3.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div><figcaption itemprop="caption description" class="pull-"><span class="caption-text">Ryzen 2 vs Intel Coffee Lake </span></figcaption></figure><p>It's the age-old question that has spurred endless debate: AMD or Intel? Today, that rivalry has reached new heights with AMD's Ryzen 2000 Series, often referred to by users (but not AMD) as "Ryzen 2," competing against Intel's 8th Gen "Coffee Lake" for desktop dominance.</p><p>To help you decide which processor platform to get, we've put Ryzen 2 and Coffee Lake through a seven-round face-off.</p><h2 id="features">Features</h2><p>AMD and Intel fight their biggest battles in the Core i7/Ryzen 7 and Core i5/Ryzen 5 families that comprise the bulk of the PC market. As we can see, prices are generally comparable between the two companies' lineups, with Ryzen 7/Core i7 spanning from $303 to $360, while the Ryzen 5/Core i5 series span from $182 to $260.</p><p>Even after Intel's adjustments to the Coffee Lake Core i7 series, AMD holds the advantage of more cores in its Ryzen 7 product line. Intel's Core i7 models come with six cores and twelve threads, while AMD's Ryzen 7 line wields eight cores and sixteen threads.</p><div ><table><tbody><tr><td  ></td><td  ><strong>AMD Ryzen 7 2700X</strong></td><td  ><strong>Intel Core i7-8700K</strong></td><td  ><strong>AMD Ryzen 7 2700</strong></td><td  ><strong>Intel Core i7-8700</strong></td><td  ><strong>AMD Ryzen 5 2600X</strong></td><td  ><strong>Intel Core i5-8600K</strong></td><td  ><strong>AMD Ryzen 5 2600</strong></td><td  ><strong>Intel Core i5-8400</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>MSRP</strong></td><td  >$329</td><td  >$359</td><td  >$299</td><td  >$303</td><td  >$229</td><td  >$257</td><td  >$199</td><td  >$182</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Cores/Threads</strong></td><td  >8/16</td><td  >6/12</td><td  >8/16</td><td  >6/12</td><td  >6/12</td><td  >6/6</td><td  >6/12</td><td  >6/6</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>TDP</strong></td><td  >105W</td><td  >95W</td><td  >65W</td><td  >65W</td><td  >95W</td><td  >95W</td><td  >65W</td><td  >65W</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Base Freq. (GHz)</strong></td><td  >3.7</td><td  >3.7</td><td  >3.2</td><td  >3.2</td><td  >3.6</td><td  >3.6</td><td  >3.4</td><td  >2.8</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Precision Boost Freq. (GHz)</strong></td><td  >4.3</td><td  >4.7</td><td  >4.1</td><td  >4.6</td><td  >4.2</td><td  >4.3</td><td  >3.9</td><td  >4.0</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Cache (L3)</strong></td><td  >16MB</td><td  >12MB</td><td  >16MB</td><td  >12MB</td><td  >16MB</td><td  >9MB</td><td  >16MB</td><td  >9MB</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Unlocked Multiplier</strong></td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >No</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >No</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Cooler</strong></td><td  >105W Wraith Prism (LED)</td><td  >No</td><td  >95W Wraith Spire (LED)</td><td  >Intel Stock</td><td  >95W Wraith Spire</td><td  >No</td><td  >65W Wraith Stealth</td><td  >Intel Stock</td></tr></tbody></table></div><p>The Ryzen 5 and Core i5 series are the general-purpose workhorses of most desktop PCs, and both lineups come with six cores. Intel has segmented its product stack by disabling Hyper-Threading on its Core i5 models, meaning software can only assign a single thread to each core. Meanwhile, AMD's Ryzen 5 models come with the company's Simultaneous Multi-Threading, which allows software to schedule two threads to each core at the same time. That gives Ryzen 5 an advantage with a total of twelve threads.</p><p>But not all cores are created equal. Intel holds the per-core performance advantage with its higher frequencies and generally processes more instructions per clock (IPC). Ryzen 7 tops out at 4.3 GHz with the 2700X model, while Intel's Core i7-8700K stretches up to 4.7 GHz. Intel's per-core performance advantage equates to more performance and responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications, such as most games and general desktop PC applications.</p><p>AMD's Ryzen 2 (2000 series) offers improved performance in heavily-threaded productivity applications, like rendering, video editing, and transcoding, and it also boosts performance in game titles that can utilize the extra cores and threads. Ryzen 2 also comes with Precision Boost 2, which is similar to Intel's multi-core boost implementation that provides higher boost frequencies when applications exercise multiple cores at once. Neither company discloses the full list of turbo frequencies, so it's hard to make comparisons based on the specifications alone, but we’ll put the processors to the test shortly.</p><p><strong>Winner: </strong>Tie. AMD Ryzen 2’s has more cores and more threads. However, Intel has higher clock speeds.</p>        <div class="featured_product_block featured_block_hero" data-id="0fd61f98-3d79-4f2a-8102-3958120434a4">            <a href="http://redirect.viglink.com?key=6c0b046b3e0ec746fbbe9b03fac3f09b&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newegg.com%2FProduct%2FProduct.aspx%3FItem%3DN82E16819113499" data-model-name="Ryzen 7 2700X" data-model-brand="" ><div class='product-image-widthsetter'><p class='vanilla-image-block' data-bordeaux-image-check style='padding-top:83.03%';><img style="width: 100%" class="featured_image" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/c2cT8QyxBHDJ3zenoyjwN3.jpg" alt=""></p></div></a>            <div class="featured_product_details_wrapper">                <div class="featured_product_title_wrapper">                                                                                <div class="featured__title">AMD Ryzen 7 2700X</div>                                    </div>                <div class="subtitle__description">                                                            <p> </p>                </div>                            </div>        </div>        <div class="featured_product_block featured_block_hero" data-id="63008e20-f589-414e-b413-1251afcbccb1">            <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/https://www.amazon.com/Intel-BX80684I78700K-Core-i7-8700K-Processor/dp/B07598VZR8/?tag=bom_tomshardware-20&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback" data-model-name="Core i7-8700K" data-model-brand="" ><div class='product-image-widthsetter'><p class='vanilla-image-block' data-bordeaux-image-check style='padding-top:122.29%';><img style="width: 100%" class="featured_image" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/j7KjsgaP5iuRZ7RRqGYQTc.jpg" alt=""></p></div></a>            <div class="featured_product_details_wrapper">                <div class="featured_product_title_wrapper">                                                                                <div class="featured__title">Intel Core i7-8700K</div>                                    </div>                <div class="subtitle__description">                                                            <p> </p>                </div>                            </div>        </div>        <div class="featured_product_block featured_block_hero" data-id="080dcab8-ed7f-40fb-816d-4884a49f1457">            <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-Processor-Wraith-Cooler/dp/B07B41717Z/?tag=bom_tomshardware-20&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback" data-model-name="Ryzen 7 2700" data-model-brand="" ><div class='product-image-widthsetter'><p class='vanilla-image-block' data-bordeaux-image-check style='padding-top:85.13%';><img style="width: 100%" class="featured_image" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/F7QH5ABrY67xiuSF7GSJde.jpg" alt=""></p></div></a>            <div class="featured_product_details_wrapper">                <div class="featured_product_title_wrapper">                                                                                <div class="featured__title">AMD Ryzen 7 2700</div>                                    </div>                <div class="subtitle__description">                                                            <p> </p>                </div>                            </div>        </div><h2 id="overclocking-3">Overclocking</h2><p>You'll need an unlocked ratio multiplier to overclock your processor, and AMD holds a distinct advantage with unlocked multipliers on every Ryzen 2 model. AMD also allows you to overclock your processor on any B- or X-series AM4 motherboard, which stands in contrast to Intel's segmentation practices.</p><p>Intel only allows overclocking with its K-series processors, which come at a premium, and you'll also need a pricier Z-series motherboard. AMD's flexible overclocking options have earned it plenty of praise in the enthusiast community because you can achieve nearly the same performance with the less-expensive "non-X" models as the pricier X models.</p><p>You'll pay for the privilege, but Intel does hold the uncontested lead in overclocking. Intel's processors generally land in the 4.9 to 5.0 GHz range after tuning, while AMD's Ryzen 2 often taps out at 4.2 GHz. Of course, the silicon lottery applies, so chip quality can have an impact on the maximum attainable overclocks.</p><p>Intel also holds the advantage on the memory overclocking front, too. The company's processors have a much higher memory data transfer rate potential than AMD's lineup. AMD's Zen microarchitecture profits greatly from increased memory data transfer rates, which often manifests as impressive performance scaling in games, while you don't see as much of a progressive performance increase from the Intel models.</p><p><strong>Winner: </strong>Intel. You can push Intel’s CPU and your memory far beyond AMD’s processors, which often run very close to the limits at stock settings.</p><h2 id="stock-coolers">Stock Coolers</h2><p>Intel's stock coolers certainly aren't noteworthy. These dinky coolers match the processors' TDP rating exactly, and Intel doesn't include them with the overclockable K-series models. Shelling out for an aftermarket cooler adds more cost to your build, so this is a problem you're paying for.</p><p>AMD's excellent coolers are one of the hallmarks of its Ryzen lineup. These coolers often support at least some level of overclocking, but they are also attractive. AMD's Ryzen 7 series now comes equipped with beefy LED-lit stock coolers, too.</p><p>The processors' TDP rating also serves as a general indicator of power consumption and thermal generation. Most of Intel and AMD's comparably-priced models share similar TDP ratings, though the Ryzen 7 2700X stands alone as the only 105W processor. That's higher than Intel's maximum 95W rating.</p><p><strong>Winner: </strong>AMD Ryzen 2. Intel's stock coolers are a joke, but nobody's laughing at AMD.</p>        <div class="featured_product_block featured_block_hero" data-id="ec121d06-dc35-49ac-a7bb-bfa7e0f4716b">            <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-Processor-Wraith-Cooler/dp/B07B428V2L/?tag=bom_tomshardware-20&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback" data-model-name="Ryzen 5 2600X" data-model-brand="" ><div class='product-image-widthsetter'><p class='vanilla-image-block' data-bordeaux-image-check style='padding-top:75.00%';><img style="width: 100%" class="featured_image" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/n6SEL4AuCHxdQqWBLh4Tsk.jpg" alt=""></p></div></a>            <div class="featured_product_details_wrapper">                <div class="featured_product_title_wrapper">                                                                                <div class="featured__title">AMD Ryzen 5 2600X</div>                                    </div>                <div class="subtitle__description">                                                            <p> </p>                </div>                            </div>        </div>        <div class="featured_product_block featured_block_hero" data-id="e5e1bef4-24e9-4ce2-84a6-d94c9ae2146d">            <a href="http://redirect.viglink.com?key=6c0b046b3e0ec746fbbe9b03fac3f09b&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newegg.com%2FProduct%2FProduct.aspx%3FItem%3DN82E16819117825" data-model-name="Core i5-8600K" data-model-brand="" ><div class='product-image-widthsetter'><p class='vanilla-image-block' data-bordeaux-image-check style='padding-top:120.30%';><img style="width: 100%" class="featured_image" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ovaurhrrbXkvAC9XyKvdJU.jpg" alt=""></p></div></a>            <div class="featured_product_details_wrapper">                <div class="featured_product_title_wrapper">                                                                                <div class="featured__title">Intel Core i5-8600K</div>                                    </div>                <div class="subtitle__description">                                                            <p> </p>                </div>                            </div>        </div>        <div class="featured_product_block featured_block_hero" data-id="0ac5b302-5596-42a5-880b-268c94ebebec">            <a href="http://www.tkqlhce.com/click-8900246-12920453?sid=tomshardware-&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newegg.com%2FProduct%2FProduct.aspx%3FItem%3DN82E16819113496" data-model-name="Ryzen 5 2600" data-model-brand="" ><div class='product-image-widthsetter'><p class='vanilla-image-block' data-bordeaux-image-check style='padding-top:75.00%';><img style="width: 100%" class="featured_image" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/n6SEL4AuCHxdQqWBLh4Tsk.jpg" alt=""></p></div></a>            <div class="featured_product_details_wrapper">                <div class="featured_product_title_wrapper">                                                                                <div class="featured__title">AMD Ryzen 5 2600</div>                                    </div>                <div class="subtitle__description">                                                            <p> </p>                </div>                            </div>        </div><h2 id="motherboards">Motherboards</h2><p>AMD and Intel's motherboards are also key considerations. As we mentioned, Intel restricts overclocking to its pricey Z-Series motherboards, while AMD allows you to overclock on its less-expensive B-series models.</p><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:711px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:74.96%;"><img id="" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/PJBp8A72ryG69MjTjWc5fV.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/PJBp8A72ryG69MjTjWc5fV.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="711" height="533" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/PJBp8A72ryG69MjTjWc5fV.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><p>AMD has also promised to support its AM4 motherboards (the models that support Ryzen processors) until 2020, so you can upgrade your system by simply dropping in a new processor. AMD has already released A-, B-, and X-series 300-series motherboards, and it is refreshing AM4 with newer 400-series motherboards. Compatibility is assured with both generations of Ryzen processors, though you may have to flash the BIOS on an older motherboard to support the newer processors.</p><p>In contrast, Intel refreshes its chipsets and sockets more frequently. The Coffee Lake models won't work in the previous-generation 200-series motherboards that have the same socket, so 300-series motherboards are your only option. Intel hasn't guaranteed socket support for its future processors, so it’s possible that newer chip generations will require a new motherboard, which restricts upgrade options.</p><p><strong>Winner:</strong> AMD. Intel squeezes you for every penny if you want to overclock, and its constant socket and chipset changes restricts future upgrades.</p><h2 id="gaming-performance">Gaming Performance</h2><p>When it comes to gaming, Coffee Lake beats Ryzen 2 on most titles, simply because more games are lightly-threaded and benefit from Intel's higher single-core clock speeds. AMD's processors are generally more competitive in game titles that can leverage their additional cores effectively, such as Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation, but Intel takes the lead in titles that benefit from increased frequency and instructions per clock cycle, like Grand Theft Auto V.</p><p>As you can see with our Middle-Earth: Shadow of War benchmark results, some games don't respond as well to increased host processing resources, instead responding better to more capable graphics cards.</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/N3kQqi8SwQfkdsNVXuPAva.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/VHzfnHfVkXf7fLUQbXKKQn.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/4vQizsZzJUmVDd7umHPeRG.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ScMAau3xdFo8PkgxXErj8V.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/rNmmkJJ3HTiVc3Xugb5HqS.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/fKVwJxepZXiFGAUbacEHpS.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/LtBUTh9Vj3aFqhhFPr4EPi.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/G9FNKCKtst8KTepiiVn7QB.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/TQW88EuFkpvZqeDfLEDLnm.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/t8RK4sgRCvUu5qF3pGBK3G.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ruzxH5bbCffoUKDGVATbJG.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ZptHBoW62Cr2DEWw2cAWtC.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>Our first two slides contain a geometric mean of frame rates for all of the games in our standard test suite. We split these values into average frame rates and 99th-percentile frame rates, with the latter being a good indicator of the smoothness of your gaming experience. The remainder of the slides contain the results of each test.</p><p>Intel's Core i7-8700K offers the highest average gaming performance at both stock and overclocked settings, though the Core i5-8600K does provide a slightly smoother experience with stock settings. AMD's Ryzen 2 processors don't provide as much peak performance, but they do offer near-equivalency in our tests at 1080p so you may not notice the difference. If you game with higher resolutions, these performance deltas will shrink further as the GPU becomes the bottleneck.</p><p>Intel's Core i5-8400 is the least expensive chip in our tests, but it offers a great level of performance for its price point. The Ryzen 5 2600X also stands out as a capable performer but overclocking the Ryzen 5 2600 yields nearly the same performance. We also see the same story play out with the Ryzen 7 2700X and 2700.</p><p><strong>Winner:</strong> Intel offers stronger performance in more games. However, if you're streaming, <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/game-streaming-encoding-coffee-lake-ryzen,5326.html">AMD's multitasking might is better</a>.</p><h2 id="productivity-performance">Productivity Performance</h2><p>Our productivity results generally mirror the respective capabilities of Ryzen 2 (2000 series), which tends to perform better in heavily-threaded applications, and Coffee Lake processors, which tend to perform best in lightly-threaded apps.</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/z6vPSaP8xTEE2NhsZhD9vP.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/mGqJjv6iN2SaUqJgTGm29F.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/7j4PGaXPps3WwJA8cRppA9.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/XTbaQTwGjzPHQb3deXZCYQ.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/utwvwLpPm4RuWjcYHijuZP.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/RegSvidozSmAeAm7Bmrai5.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/T9rh737cLvL8UwY6FQSC7E.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/NqWus4zmnsBtawY4tztJsR.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/SMQBvc4Ku2px5AfkDTcm54.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/tM6yTr4XRw3y7PhSct4eCk.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/QDAyAcy9qe9uQSYLabFhni.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/aDaxbdoDFpjgakKbpWpsVC.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/2Za7JrfbpDYwdwFMRpkiJd.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/XtrWpskDDzcUmjPGbAt5QV.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/uCnfZuH2dnETPu4zxsvyod.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/zrdLVXSeH5sqTESHyicfKL.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/SwGgZcPgJvoCKbGxY8ZQif.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/jufPuUTL8bVhVh3v3z4cqS.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/KFxRVyoiTYK5MBfFgVyAR.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/DXANDd5pSH58iBjaHVJj2e.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/YYYzYnuonCQwUy69uErwgM.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>That means Ryzen excels in decompression, compression, and rendering applications, but the chips also provide more than acceptable performance across our wide range of lightly-threaded workloads.</p><p>Intel's Coffee Lake processors also provide acceptable performance in those applications, but they excel in lightly-threaded apps. That includes applications like the Adobe Creative Cloud Suite, web browsers, single-core rendering workloads, and our LAME encoding benchmark. Intel also enjoys a performance advantage in applications that leverage powerful AVX instructions, like our x265 HandBrake test.</p><p><strong>Winner:</strong> Tie. If you are primarily browsing the web, using office apps or even playing with Adobe's creative suite, Intel is faster. However, if you use a lot of multi-threaded, non-Adobe software for rendering videos, photos and animations, AMD is a better choice.</p><h2 id="value">Value</h2><p>By almost any measure, AMD processors offer more bang for your buck. First, with two equivalent chips, the AMD processor is usually cheaper. For example, at publishing time, the high-end AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ($319) was $20 cheaper than the equivalent Intel chip, the Core i7-8700K ($339) while the mid-range Ryzen 5 2600X ($219) was about $35 less its counterpart, the Core i5-8600K ($244).</p><p>If you want to overclock with Intel, you have to spend extra for a K-series CPU, but with AMD, you can buy a mainstream chip and overclock it. And if you want to overclock your Intel CPU, you need a pricey,  Z-Series motherboard, but with AMD, you can overclock with even an inexpensive B-Series board.</p><p>But wait, there's more. The AMD chips all come with really good stock CPU coolers that you might actually want to use while Intel doesn't even give you a fan for its K-series chips and gives you a poor-quality one for the rest of its lineup.</p><p><strong>Winner: </strong>AMD Ryzen 2 by a landslide.</p><h2 id="bottom-line">Bottom Line</h2><p>Ryzen 2 wins this competition by a nose, winning five rounds to four. Of the seven rounds in our face-off, two -- features and productivity performance -- were a tie. However, the real winner here is you. As a consumer, you have a wide variety of great processor choices from two strong manufacturers.</p><p>Which CPU platform you choose should depend on two main factors: your budget and what types of software you use most. If you want the best performance for the majority of games and productivity apps, which are lightly threaded, Intel Coffee Lake is your top choice. However, if you want the best speed for the money or you use a lot of heavily-threaded apps, AMD Ryzen 2 was made for you.</p><div ><table><tbody><tr><td  ><strong>Round</strong></td><td  ><strong>Intel Coffee Lake</strong></td><td  ><strong>AMD Ryzen 2</strong></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Features</strong></td><td  >✗</td><td  >✗</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Overclocking</strong></td><td  >✗</td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Stock Coolers</strong></td><td  ></td><td  >✗</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Motherboards</strong></td><td  ></td><td  >✗</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Gaming Performance</strong></td><td  >✗</td><td  ></td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Productivity Performance</strong></td><td  >✗</td><td  >✗</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Value</strong></td><td  ></td><td  >✗</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Total</strong></td><td  >4</td><td  >5</td></tr></tbody></table></div><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ AMD Ryzen 5 2600X Review: Spectre Patches Weigh In ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-5-2600x,5579.html</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ AMD's Ryzen 5 2600X comes with all of the goodness of AMD's new Zen+ architecture, let's see how it stacks up against Intel's finest. ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">gZWKPwGXvsXSjEHppMzm7n</guid>
                                                                                                <enclosure url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/kyuhaB8ZPeNE6ikCCpdTfk-1280-80.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="0"></enclosure>
                                                                        <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                <updated>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 15:30:17 +0000</updated>
                                                                                                                                            <category><![CDATA[CPUs]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[PC Components]]></category>
                                                                                                <author><![CDATA[ palcorn@outlook.com (Paul Alcorn) ]]></author>                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Paul Alcorn ]]></dc:creator>                                                                                    <dc:source><![CDATA[ https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/RZRmFeQfPy3etHjBQitbGW.jpeg ]]></dc:source>
                                                                <dc:description><![CDATA[ &lt;p&gt;As a teenager, Paul scraped up enough money to buy a 486-powered PC with a turbo button (yes, a turbo button). Back when floppies were still popular he was already chasing after the fastest spinners for his personal computer, which led him down the long and winding storage road, covering enterprise storage. His current focus is on consumer processors, though he still keeps a close eye on the latest storage news. In his spare time, you’ll find Paul hanging out with his kids or indulging his love of the Kansas City Chiefs and Royals.&lt;/p&gt; ]]></dc:description>
                                                                                                                                <cf:isSponsored>false</cf:isSponsored>
                <cf:hasAffiliateLinks>false</cf:hasAffiliateLinks>
                <cf:isPaid>false</cf:isPaid>
                                                                                                                                <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/kyuhaB8ZPeNE6ikCCpdTfk-1280-80.jpg">
                                                            <media:credit><![CDATA[null]]></media:credit>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </media:content>
                                                    <media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/kyuhaB8ZPeNE6ikCCpdTfk-1280-80.jpg" />
                                                                                                                                                                    <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <h2 id="ryzen-to-the-mainstream">Ryzen To The Mainstream </h2><p>AMD's 2000-series Ryzen CPUs are already available, challenging the Coffee Lake-based Core line-up from Intel. As we found in our <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-7-2700x-review,5571.html">Ryzen 7 2700X review</a>, a host of improvements made possible by 12nm manufacturing, such as higher frequencies and Precision Boost 2, add more performance in threaded apps. Meanwhile, lower system memory and cache latencies augment AMD's showing in lightly-threaded apps like games. Unlocked multipliers, backward compatibility with older Socket AM4 motherboards, a beefy bundled cooler, and a $330 price tag combine to leave us impressed. The Ryzen 7 2700X offers a great alternative to Intel's Core i7-8700K, which costs more, doesn't come with a thermal solution, and drops into more expensive motherboards (at least if you want to overclock).</p><p>Similarly, Ryzen 5 2600X targets Intel's enthusiast-oriented Core i5-8600K, leveraging similar advancements and a more attractive $230 price tag. As we'll see, it's even faster than the first-gen flagship Ryzen 7 1800X in many workloads.</p><h2 id="but-first-spectre-variant-2">But First, Spectre Variant 2</h2><p>Unfortunately, due to a lack of communication from AMD, we weren't told that the company had rolled its Spectre Variant 2 patch into shipping X470 platforms. As a result, our Ryzen 7 2700X launch day coverage didn't include Intel CPUs tested with their corresponding patches. Today's review does, however, feature results generated on Intel-based systems with the latest Spectre microcode updates.</p><h2 id="ryzen-5-2600x">Ryzen 5 2600X</h2><p>Ryzen 2000-series processors, otherwise known by their Pinnacle Ridge code name, are based on the <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-zen-cpu-microarchitecture,32540.html">same basic Zen core design</a> as previous-gen models (though AMD now uses Zen+ nomenclature to reference the architecture's various improvements). The CPUs still utilize a <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-5-1600x-cpu-review,5014-2.html">dual-CCX configuration, tied together with Infinity Fabric</a>, yielding eight physical cores. The flagship Ryzen 7 2700X comes with all eight of its cores active. For Ryzen 5 2600X, AMD turns two off, creating a six-core, 12-thread configuration with an unlocked ratio multiplier.</p><p>As mentioned, Ryzen 5 2600X sells for $230, replacing <span>the $220 Ryzen 5 1600X. </span>It slots into the gap between Core i5-8600K and the Core i5-8400, forcing the chip to contend with <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-coffee-lake-300-series-chipset,36791.html">Intel's recently-announced Core i5-8600</a>. While we don't have that model in our lab yet, we do have the two nearest Coffee Lake-based competitors in today's benchmark charts.</p><p>What do you get, performance-wise, for the extra $10? Ryzen 5 2600X <span>sports the same 3.6 GHz base clock rate and a slightly higher 4.2 GHz Precision Boost 2 frequency (+200 MHz) than 1600X. That might seem minor, but as our benchmarks show, the gains are quite pronounced in threaded workloads. Like its predecessor, the 2600X also features 16MB of L3 cache and a 95W TDP.<br/></span></p><div ><table><tbody><tr><td  ></td><td  >AMD Ryzen 7 2700X</td><td  >AMD Ryzen 7 1800X</td><td  >AMD Ryzen 7 2700</td><td  >AMD Ryzen 5 1600X</td><td  >Ryzen 5 1600</td><td  ><strong>AMD Ryzen 5 2600X</strong></td><td  ><strong>AMD Ryzen 5 2600</strong></td><td  >Intel Core i5-8600K</td><td  >Intel Core i5-8600</td><td  >Intel Core i5-8400</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>MSRP</strong></td><td  >$329</td><td  >$349</td><td  >$299</td><td  >$219</td><td  >$189</td><td  >$229</td><td  >$199</td><td  >$257</td><td  >$224</td><td  >$182</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Cores/Threads</strong></td><td  >8/16</td><td  >8/16</td><td  >8/16</td><td  >6/12</td><td  >6/12</td><td  >6/12</td><td  >6/12</td><td  >6/6</td><td  >6/6</td><td  >6/6</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>TDP</strong></td><td  >105W</td><td  >95W</td><td  >65W</td><td  >95W</td><td  >65W</td><td  >95W</td><td  >65W</td><td  >95W</td><td  >65W</td><td  >65W</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Base Freq. (GHz)</strong></td><td  >3.7</td><td  >3.6</td><td  >3.2</td><td  >3.6</td><td  >3.2</td><td  >3.6</td><td  >3.4</td><td  >3.6</td><td  >3.1</td><td  >2.8</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Precision Boost Freq. (GHz)</strong></td><td  >4.3</td><td  >4.1</td><td  >4.1</td><td  >4.0</td><td  >3.6</td><td  >4.2</td><td  >3.9</td><td  >4.3</td><td  >4.3</td><td  >4.0</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Cache (L3)</strong></td><td  >16MB</td><td  >16MB</td><td  >16MB</td><td  >16MB</td><td  >16MB</td><td  >16MB</td><td  >16MB</td><td  >9MB</td><td  >9MB</td><td  >9MB</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Unlocked Multiplier</strong></td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >No</td><td  >No</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Cooler</strong></td><td  >105W Wraith Prism (LED)</td><td  >-</td><td  >95W Wraith Spire (LED)</td><td  >-</td><td  >95W Wraith Spire</td><td  >95W Wraith Spire</td><td  >65W Wraith Stealth</td><td  >-</td><td  >Intel</td><td  >Intel</td></tr></tbody></table></div><p>Although AMD didn't include thermal solutions with its original Ryzen X-series processors, the company does bundle coolers with its pricier models now. On one hand, it's nice that the 95W Wraith Spire cooler neatly matches the 2600X's thermal design power. On the other, we're not expecting much overclocking headroom from the combination.</p><p>Ryzen 5 2600X can drop into either new X470 or older 300-series motherboards. As usual, AMD allows you to overclock on value-minded B-series boards, too. And even though 400-series B-models aren't available yet, they'll undoubtedly offer a lower-priced alternative for overclocking.</p><p>Officially, the Ryzen 5 2600X supports up to DDR4-2933 memory, just like Ryzen 7 2700X. This trumps Coffee Lake's Intel-specified DDR4-2666 ceiling (<a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-7-2700x-review,5571-2.html">with a few caveats</a>). AMD also sticks with Indium solder between Ryzen 5's die and heat spreader, improving thermal transfer performance. And as we mentioned in our Ryzen 7 2700X review, these new CPUs also include StorMI Technology, which is a software-based tiering solution that blends the low price and high capacity of a hard drive with the speed of an SSD, 3D XPoint (including <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-optane-ssd-800p,5497.html">Intel's Optane parts</a>), or even up to 2GB of RAM.</p><h2 id="precision-boost-2-and-xfr2-2">Precision Boost 2 and XFR2</h2><p>In a nutshell, AMD is leveraging GlobalFoundries' 12nm process to enhance its design, rather than shrink it. The enhancements offer higher performance or lower power consumption at any given frequency, giving AMD headroom for other improvements.</p><p>The company's previous-gen Ryzen processors have Precision Boost, which is similar to Intel's Turbo Boost technology, and eXtended Frequency Range (XFR), capable of delivering a frequency uplift when your cooling solution has thermal headroom to spare.</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/dP5hpEZQKxe9nAP9Zd2WJ7.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/NYSEggBR5g7BcaEzuSpik9.jpg" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>The new Precision Boost 2 (PB2) and XFR2 algorithms improve performance in threaded workloads by raising the frequency of any number of cores. AMD doesn't share a list of specific multi-core Precision Boost 2 and XFR2 bins because the opportunistic algorithms accelerate to different clock rates based on temperature, current, and load.</p><p><span> AMD gave us a graph of the PB2 frequencies for Ryzen 7 2700X, but we followed up with our own measurements to compare the current and previous-gen Ryzen 5 models. As you can see, Ryzen 5 2600X offers more robust multi-core frequencies than its predecessor, and our Ryzen 7 2700X measurements largely mirror AMD's. We tested both CPUs with AMD's Precision Boost Overdrive active. The Ryzen 7 2700X does have a higher TDP rating that some older motherboards may struggle with, so <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-7-2700x-review,5571-2.html">PB2 performance will vary</a> based upon the power delivery subsystem.<br/></span></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p>        <div class="featured_product_block featured_block_hero" data-id="8f103f28-167f-4177-a017-f775eb3a9177">            <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-Processor-Wraith-Cooler/dp/B07B428M7F/?tag=bom_tomshardware-20&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback" data-model-name="Ryzen 7 2700X" data-model-brand="" ><div class='product-image-widthsetter'><p class='vanilla-image-block' data-bordeaux-image-check style='padding-top:83.03%';><img style="width: 100%" class="featured_image" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/c2cT8QyxBHDJ3zenoyjwN3.jpg" alt=""><span class='featured__label hero__label'> </span></p></div></a>            <div class="featured_product_details_wrapper">                <div class="featured_product_title_wrapper">                                                                                <div class="featured__title">AMD Ryzen 7 2700X</div>                                    </div>                <div class="subtitle__description">                                                            <p> </p>                </div>                            </div>        </div>        <div class="featured_product_block featured_block_hero" data-id="49be5ab8-560f-4752-913c-a936800de481">            <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-Processor-Wraith-Cooler/dp/B07B428V2L/?tag=bom_tomshardware-20&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback" data-model-name="Ryzen 5 2600X" data-model-brand="" ><div class='product-image-widthsetter'><p class='vanilla-image-block' data-bordeaux-image-check style='padding-top:82.55%';><img style="width: 100%" class="featured_image" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/NGCRsMpYvNzAhf8vPeWere.jpg" alt=""><span class='featured__label hero__label'> </span></p></div></a>            <div class="featured_product_details_wrapper">                <div class="featured_product_title_wrapper">                                                                                <div class="featured__title">AMD Ryzen 5 2600X</div>                                    </div>                <div class="subtitle__description">                                                            <p> </p>                </div>                            </div>        </div><h2 id="patching-up-overclocking-amp-test-setup">Patching Up, Overclocking & Test Setup</h2><h2 id="patching-up">Patching Up </h2><p>The Spectre and Meltdown security vulnerabilities impose overhead that affect performance, but it's the Spectre Variant 2 patches that incur the largest penalties. We've been waiting for AMD and Intel to release their respective updates, leveling the playing field. AMD gave no indication in its press material that the X470 motherboards used in our Ryzen 7 2700X review already had Spectre 2 mitigations built-in. But hours before launch, we learned that the patches were present. At that point, we didn't have enough time to test with Intel's corresponding microcode.</p><p>In our 2700X review, the test rigs included Meltdown And Spectre Variant 1 mitigations. Spectre Variant 2 requires both motherboard firmware/microcode and operating system patches, though. We had already installed the operating system updates for Variant 2 on our Intel-based platforms, so we only lacked the fourth and final piece: new microcode.</p><p>There are two options for applying this microcode. One is a Windows KB that allows the operating system to load microcode during boot-up. The other is a motherboard firmware update. We used the Windows KB to install patches on our Z270-based platform, providing a true measure of pre- and post-patch performance.</p><p>Faster processors suffer less from the Spectre Variant 2 updates. This creates a conundrum for us and our Z370-based platform. In previous reviews, we noticed that Intel's Core i7-8700 was consistently faster than the more expensive Core i7-8700K on MSI and Gigabyte motherboards. We <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-coffee-lake-i7-8700k-cpu,5252-4.html">disclosed this during our launch coverage</a>. The issue becomes relevant today because MSI's latest firmware update, which also includes the Spectre Variant 2 microcode, fixes most of the performance disparities we observed. As we suspected, the problem seems attributable to the Core i7-8700K. It's now faster in several games, performing the way we originally expected. So, on this motherboard, we're using new firmware instead of the Windows-based patch since it fixes our Core i7-8700K issues. That means our Coffee Lake-based CPUs don't correctly reflect pre- and post-patch performance. Instead, allow those results to serve as a general indication of competitive deltas.</p><p>In any case, with the exception of our AMD X370-based motherboards, all of the platforms in today's review are fully patched. The company hasn't given us a time frame for securing its previous-gen chipsets, but you can bet that we'll follow up with benchmark results once a Spectre Variant 2 patch becomes available.</p><h2 id="overclocking-4">Overclocking</h2><p>We ran our gaming and application tests in the U.S. lab, while power/thermal measurements were collected in our German lab.</p><p>In the U.S. lab, we paired our Ryzen 5 2600X with Corsair's H115i cooler for overclocking. This allowed us to maintain a 4.2 GHz all-core frequency at 1.3875V Vcore, 1.2V SoC voltage, and default Load Line Calibration settings. These are the same settings used on the Ryzen 7 2700X, albeit with a slight 0.009V Vcore boost to ensure stability.</p><p>First-gen Ryzen processors don't have much memory overclocking headroom, so we're still testing tuned X370 platforms at DDR4-3200. The X470 chipset is remarkably stable at higher data rates with both 2000-series Ryzen CPUs installed. So, we settled on DDR4-3466 with 14-14-14-34 timings. We also ran our overclocked Intel processors at DDR4-3466.</p><h2 id="precision-boost-overdrive-2">Precision Boost Overdrive</h2><p>AMD hasn't shared much information on this pending feature, which increases the maximum boost voltage and boost duration. We attempted to disable Precision Boost Overdrive as we tested for our Ryzen 7 2700X review, but didn't observe a performance difference one way or the other. Now we know the feature wasn't toggling correctly due to an issue with the board. Instead, it remained enabled throughout our benchmarking.</p><p>Precision Boost Overdrive is an AMD-sanctioned feature, unlike the multi-core enhancements you often find in Intel-based motherboards. Because this is a standard capability for Ryzen 2000-series processors, we leave it enabled.</p><h2 id="msi-x470-gaming-m7-ac-2">MSI X470 Gaming M7 AC</h2><p><span class="notranslate">Our MSI X470 Gaming M7 AC has a PCI Express 3.0 slot with a x16 link, a slot with a x8 connection, and another PCI Express 2.0 slot with a four-lane link for graphics cards. Its </span><span class="notranslate">four RAM slots support DDR4-2933 and can scale up quite a bit higher through overclocking.</span></p><p><span class="notranslate">The motherboard also provides two M.2 slots with PCIe connectivity.</span><span class="notranslate"> The I/O panel has a USB 3.1 Type C connector.</span><span class="notranslate"> The </span><span class="notranslate">USB 3.1 and USB 3.1 Gen 2 support fast charging for smartphones and tablets.</span><span class="notranslate"> If RGB is your thing, MSI has you covered. T</span><span class="notranslate">he integrated RGB Mystic lighting allows customizable effects with several software-controlled zones.</span><span class="notranslate"><br/></span></p><h2 id="comparison-products-6">Comparison Products </h2>        <div class="featured_product_block featured_block_hero" data-id="0122049c-6163-4620-b0fd-b76e0bda898b">            <a href="http://www.tkqlhce.com/click-8900246-12920453?sid=tomshardware-&url=https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819117824" data-model-name="Core i5-8400" data-model-brand="" ><div class='product-image-widthsetter'><p class='vanilla-image-block' data-bordeaux-image-check style='padding-top:108.91%';><img style="width: 100%" class="featured_image" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/Mbp7fKeJrnqTAagSTBP399.jpg" alt=""></p></div></a>            <div class="featured_product_details_wrapper">                <div class="featured_product_title_wrapper">                                                                                <div class="featured__title">Intel Core i5-8400</div>                                    </div>                <div class="subtitle__description">                                                            <p> </p>                </div>                            </div>        </div>        <div class="featured_product_block featured_block_hero" data-id="f26d68fa-fd80-4ad6-b2f3-526977dd83ef">            <a href="http://redirect.viglink.com?key=6c0b046b3e0ec746fbbe9b03fac3f09b&u=https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819117825" data-model-name="Core i5-8600K" data-model-brand="" ><div class='product-image-widthsetter'><p class='vanilla-image-block' data-bordeaux-image-check style='padding-top:120.30%';><img style="width: 100%" class="featured_image" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ovaurhrrbXkvAC9XyKvdJU.jpg" alt=""></p></div></a>            <div class="featured_product_details_wrapper">                <div class="featured_product_title_wrapper">                                                                                <div class="featured__title">Intel Core i5-8600K</div>                                    </div>                <div class="subtitle__description">                                                            <p> </p>                </div>                            </div>        </div>        <div class="featured_product_block featured_block_hero" data-id="7bbf8fae-b90a-48a9-b706-eca3f1d7d599">            <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/https://www.amazon.com/Intel-Desktop-Processor-i7-7700K-BX80677I77700K/dp/B01MXSI216/?tag=bom_tomshardware-20&ascsubtag=%site%%transactionId%-gclid-%gclid%-Fallback" data-model-name="Core i7-7700K" data-model-brand="" ><div class='product-image-widthsetter'><p class='vanilla-image-block' data-bordeaux-image-check style='padding-top:128.84%';><img style="width: 100%" class="featured_image" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/uXuLfgK33H8rdH2AUffqUk.jpg" alt=""></p></div></a>            <div class="featured_product_details_wrapper">                <div class="featured_product_title_wrapper">                                                                                <div class="featured__title">Intel Core i7-7700K</div>                                    </div>                <div class="subtitle__description">                                                            <p> </p>                </div>                            </div>        </div><h2 id="test-systems-4">Test Systems</h2><div ><table><thead><tr><th  colspan="2"><strong>Test System & Configuration</strong></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td  ><strong>Hardware</strong></td><td  ><strong><strong><strong>Germany </strong></strong>AMD Socket AM4 (400-Series)</strong>AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, Ryzen 5 2600XMSI X470 Gaming M7 AC2x 8GB G.Skill FlareX DDR4-3200 @ DDR4-2933, DDR4-3466<strong>Intel LGA 1151 (Z370):</strong>Intel Core i5-8600K, i5-8600K, Core i5-8400MSI Z370 Gaming Pro Carbon AC2x 8GB Corsair Vengeance DDR4-3200 @ 2666<strong>AMD Socket </strong><strong>AM4 Workstation (300-Series)</strong>AMD Ryzen 5 1500X, Ryzen 5 1600X, Ryzen 5 1400MSI X370 Tomahawk4x 8GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 @ 2667 and 3200 <strong>Intel LGA 1151 (Z270)</strong>Intel Core i7-7700KMSI Z270 Gaming 72x 8GB Corsair Vengeance DDR4-3200 @ 2400 and 3200<strong>All Systems</strong>GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition (Gaming)Nvidia Quadro P6000 (Workstation)1x 1TB Toshiba OCZ RD400 (M.2, System)2x 960GB Toshiba OCZ TR150 (Storage, Images)be quiet! Dark Power Pro 11, 850W Power SupplyWindows 10 Pro (Creators Update)<strong><strong>U.S.AMD Socket AM4 (400-Series)</strong></strong>AMD Ryzen 7 2700XMSI X470 Gaming M7 AC2x 8GB G.Skill FlareX DDR4-3200 @ DDR4-2933, DDR4-3466<strong>Intel LGA 1151 (Z370):</strong>Intel Core i7-8700K, i5-8600K, Core i5-8400MSI Z370 Gaming Pro Carbon AC2x 8GB G.Skill FlareX DDR4-3200 @ DDR4-2400, DDR4-2667, DDR4-3466<strong>AMD Socket AM4 (300-Series)</strong>AMD Ryzen 7 1800X, 1700X, 1700, Ryzen 5 1600XMSI X370 Xpower Gaming Titanium2x 8GB G.Skill FlareX DDR4-3200 @ DDR4-2667, DDR4-3200<strong><span>Intel LGA 1151 (Z270)</span></strong>Intel Core i7-7700K MSI Z270 Gaming M72x 8GB G.Skill FlareX DDR4-3200 @ DDR4-2400<strong>All</strong> EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 FE 1TB Samsung PM863 SilverStone ST1500-TI, 1500W Windows 10 Creators Update Version 1703 - All Spectre and Meltdown mitigations</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Cooling</strong></td><td  ><strong>Germany</strong>Alphacool Eiszeit 2000 ChillerAlphacool Eisblock XPXThermal Grizzly Kryonaut (For Cooler Switch)<strong>U.S.</strong>Corsair H115i</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Monitor</strong></td><td  >Eizo EV3237-BK</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>PC Case</strong></td><td  >Lian Li PC-T70 with Extension Kit and Mods Configurations: Open Benchtable, Closed Case</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Power Consumption Measurement</strong></td><td  >Contact-free DC Measurement at PCIe Slot (Using a Riser Card) Contact-free DC Measurement at External Auxiliary Power Supply Cable Direct Voltage Measurement at Power Supply 2x Rohde & Schwarz HMO 3054, 500 MHz Digital Multi-Channel Oscilloscope with Storage Function4x Rohde & Schwarz HZO50 Current Probe (1mA - 30A, 100 kHz, DC) 4x Rohde & Schwarz HZ355 (10:1 Probes, 500 MHz) 1x Rohde & Schwarz HMC 8012 Digital Multimeter with Storage Function</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Thermal Measurement</strong></td><td  >1x Optris PI640 80 Hz Infrared Camera + PI Connect Real-Time Infrared Monitoring and Recording</td></tr><tr><td  ><strong>Acoustic Measurement</strong></td><td  >NTI Audio M2211 (with Calibration File, Low Cut at 50Hz) Steinberg UR12 (with Phantom Power for Microphones)Creative X7, Smaart v.7 Custom-Made Proprietary Measurement Chamber, 3.5 x 1.8 x 2.2m (L x D x H) Perpendicular to Center of Noise Source(s), Measurement Distance of 50cm Noise Level in dB(A) (Slow), Real-time Frequency Analyzer (RTA) Graphical Frequency Spectrum of Noise</td></tr></tbody></table></div><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="vrmark-3dmark-amp-aots-escalation-3">VRMark, 3DMark & AotS: Escalation</h2><h2 id="vrmark-amp-3dmark-4">VRMark & 3DMark </h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/7njLmU4V9WdRQTpUyNTEhR.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/2pi4uXr3JnsUn7NvBm56LB.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/DFHxEZPQuZWnQknUA5pLWH.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>These are busy charts with the addition of our retested Intel platforms, including the Spectre Variant 2 microcode patches. At stock settings, the Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms its overclocked predecessor across the board, which is especially meaningful in the lightly-threaded VRMark workload. Overclocking yields significant gains in synthetic gaming benchmarks, which don't necessarily translate to the rest of our benchmark suite.</p><p>Several of the patched Intel processors do lose performance compared to before the updates. This is particularly apparent in VRMark on Intel's Core i7-8700K, while other tests reflect minimal regression. Meanwhile, the Core i5-8400 and -8600K give us mixed results. Core i7-7700K is a more representative measure of pre- and post-patch performance, and it takes a healthy dive in VRMark as well (verified several times by removing and reinstalling the OS-based Spectre patch).</p><h2 id="ashes-of-the-singularity-escalation-6">Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/eLEZAd5njhD7qm8LBnG7DP.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/sf8ALTVZUwECBWTCQk2nGN.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/u7iKMypvLDcPC4xBsKhgdS.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/Eci5ZbggCkzVpMQrifppma.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/UyQbYNrbUyxT3VwG85RfS3.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/vPreZMhUMLW5xUGcWNYhqE.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>Ryzen 5 2600X is clearly superior to its predecessor in threaded titles. After all, the stock 2600X beats an overclocked 1600X. Those gains propel the Ryzen 5 up the chart, where it matches a stock Core i7-8700K.</p><p>Flip over to the album's next slide, which includes Intel CPUs before and after we patched their platforms. The Core i7-7700K loses a few frames per second in our retest, falling outside of this consistent benchmark's margin of error. Aside from the Core i5-8400's gains, which remind us that firmware updates sometimes fine-tune performance, too, most of the Intel CPUs land within the run-to-run variance we expect to see. </p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="civilization-vi-graphics-amp-ai-dawn-of-war-iii-3">Civilization VI Graphics & AI, Dawn of War III</h2><h2 id="civilization-vi-ai-test-5">Civilization VI AI Test</h2><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:1112px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:75.00%;"><img id="" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/UZEEDekrDNxk6gEDBQjATT.png" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/UZEEDekrDNxk6gEDBQjATT.png" align="" fullscreen="1" width="1112" height="834" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/UZEEDekrDNxk6gEDBQjATT.png' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><p>The Ryzen 5 2600X represents a nice step forward for AMD, particularly since Intel's processors typically lead in this test due to their per-core performance advantage.</p><p>A few of the processors exhibit slight regressions post-patch, but nothing outside of the variances we'd expect.  </p><h2 id="civilization-vi-graphics-test-5">Civilization VI Graphics Test</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/oiMyzPHtGDNb2e2Lyhan4K.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/U9M4PGQKAGPqPww9MtYcTB.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/vMkCLafYBt3fxm9kDLPK8n.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/vTyjtbJAwvFEUg4hBdxcGT.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/zDprcyp2nPqrTxLsVXZX3Y.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/R6vgtMrMoVvEEh8gz28kPH.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>An overclocked Ryzen 5 2600X beats the stock Ryzen 7 2700X, which should excite value-seekers.</p><p>Then again, Intel's Core i5-8400 slips past the tuned Ryzen 5 in this test, yielding better performance at a lower price (and despite a locked ratio multiplier).</p><h2 id="warhammer-40-000-dawn-of-war-iii-6">Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War III</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/egeHx5WEjK6ugd6ZujbYpS.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/3pv4f5jSBwCJswQrUdBnUo.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/YK8LW6uPrBgdUURxkGaMsm.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/YxAGfUoxu9oBhQbGGQNdw9.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/s3iWx9EHNHFgA8tjvJWVH9.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/EBj84HXwwsnLv5tgNuMtYf.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p><em>Dawn of War</em> finds the tuned Coffee Lake-based CPUs at the top of our chart. Even the fastest Ryzen (overclocked, no less) lands behind a stock Core i7-7700K.</p><p>Interestingly, the Coffee Lake CPUs enjoy slight gains after we patch them, while Core i7-7700K doesn't change much.  </p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="far-cry-primal-gta-v-amp-hitman-3">Far Cry Primal, GTA: V & Hitman</h2><h2 id="far-cry-primal-4">Far Cry Primal </h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/nb869QrBhFQvCTSMRgdyRG.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/fhyei95gymgRTC53AzMUhZ.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/iLUA37jiCAus6YstNZHbkk.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ZsZtF8AVNXs3zWYhQMtSVV.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/GkJSSuvRnRegTGzrZeBpAG.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/uRH6F37mEBiKg5RdrBFdxX.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>Ryzen 5 2600X nearly matches Intel's Core i7-8700K at stock clock rates. But tuning propels the chip ahead of an overclocked Ryzen 7 2700X and into contention with Core i5-8600K at 4.9 GHz. Clearly, this title responds well to physical core count, favoring platforms without SMT enabled.</p><h2 id="grand-theft-auto-v-6">Grand Theft Auto V</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/37jP8mExYhGuXQ7FQThWoC.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/h8yWj7hYaSqCi5WJGwqcMj.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/zhyCwmxzCHYpUDVk9V4Eh9.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/yczVBNG7vYrxdFm4X24mWY.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/NE2nFBpFaqJKA2pGTMBefA.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/pWAyvABWkUtzHX7GzU85bh.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>It's no surprise to see Intel's processors dominate our <em>Grand Theft Auto V</em> charts. An overclocked Ryzen 5 2600X essentially ties the stock Core i7-7700K, while Core i5-8400 stands out again for its higher performance and lower price point.</p><p>The post-patch Core i7-8700K averages 9 FPS-higher in <em>GTA V.</em> This is one of the games where -8700K historically lagged the slower Core i7-8700, so it looks like motherboard firmware fixed a few issues. We also see an improvement from the Core i5-8400.</p><h2 id="hitman-6">Hitman </h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/BabLDJjHoVkmY3G9qNuCC8.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/LXaEY6aEm6MahMdwm5tUMC.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/NK3iS9QXsKsHV9CoZRDsmL.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/47jcKkHXrBjEDPdf6pAgjP.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/CdY6BxEXXwfi8MkBqzePei.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ksz62BH6NbeP3SvtPtytEm.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>A recent update added a frame rate cap to <em>Hitman</em>, causing most of our configurations to reflect a graphics bottleneck. It's no surprise, then, that an overclocked Ryzen 5 2600X nearly matches the fastest Intel CPUs.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="shadow-of-war-amp-project-cars-2-3">Shadow Of War & Project CARS 2</h2><h2 id="middle-earth-shadow-of-war-6">Middle-earth: Shadow Of War</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/fXxsEsXAa2uRMKCD55RDBK.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ygoUCSDea9o2BfEc6pk4F9.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/QNtSGey6iozyQK7nkgxfJH.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/g4ta6b69YL4o3nbxo6Dd2K.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/aqw9gTjjftsm5qcYDqHxwT.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/K3iyFU5irFHvmW9qVnuDi9.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>Ryzen 5 2600X beats the overclocked Ryzen 7 1800X, and tuning propels it to within 0.5 FPS of the fastest CPU.</p><p>Intel's Core i5-8400 is less expensive and tends to outperform the 2600X in many games, but the 2600X does lead in this one. Aside from the Core i5-8400, we observe lower average frame rates from the post-patch Intel processors, though the variances only amount to one or two frames per second.</p><h2 id="project-cars-2-6">Project CARS 2</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/CgcFVc9RPAt4WukLw6VZqj.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/oxRMkF4gJnGY8kY4uKDKaA.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/chTYug9pLE2QLioRpWdwCU.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/M53ugEUe3EqRvsCvAFNmCF.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/YjP8zGAaiJnU3wKWtbnhYH.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/pruWwnc9azhtYgsjDoGukc.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>Ryzen 5 2600X delivers a commendable performance in <em>Project CARS 2</em>, but it lags the less expensive Core i5-8400.</p><p>Aside from the Core i7-8700K's and i5-8400's performance gains, we don't significant variations related to Spectre mitigations.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="office-amp-productivity-3">Office & Productivity</h2><h2 id="adobe-creative-cloud-6">Adobe Creative Cloud</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/BrTQPDTp9rqYbrm2j6csuF.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/b63wnE26tm38HtNhQNsnWK.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/S6tjunNqXzscrbqccvbdd3.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/BCCp2rtcs7F3ZobhWtJf9M.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/qFzELxzQkSS6xJkr42KkPJ.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/4S3S8QE3cs4WtnZU3YE6wA.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>The stock Ryzen 5 2600X trails most of AMD's first-gen Ryzen CPUs, notably lagging behind the previous-gen Ryzen 5 1600X. We reran this benchmark several times to verify its results, and the outcome is repeatable. But given the performance observed in other tests, PCMark's Creative Cloud component may be an outlier.</p><p>Although we didn't see much performance variation from the patches in our game testing, that changes drastically in our Adobe Creative Cloud suite. Every Intel processor's overall score takes a significant haircut (the Core i7-8700K drops ~9%, while the Core i5-8400 drops ~10%).</p><h2 id="web-browser-6">Web Browser</h2><p>The Krakken suite tests JavaScript performance using several workloads, including audio, imaging, and cryptography.</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/xmeicgbei7WSKy2hiWhcjL.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/TL3hwoZw6AGm9k4VrL9sPh.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/xUU8TLkbKSokhpxwQY9vFA.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>AMD's processors typically lag Intel's in Web browser benchmarks due to their lower per-core performance. The Ryzen 5 2600X is competitive with Intel's Core i5-8400 in this test. But as we noted in our Ryzen 7 2700X review, overclocking actually results in lower scores during lightly-threaded tasks. That's a bit more surprising in this case because, as we pointed out on the first page, Ryzen 5 2600X sustains up to 4.2 GHz on a single core, which is the same frequency as our all-core overclock. XFR2 contributes an extra boost during sporadic workloads though, and that's likely what we're seeing here.</p><p>The MotionMark benchmarks, which emphasize graphics performance (rather than JavaScript), are also sensitive to CPU clock rates. Ryzen 5 2600X isn't as competitive compared to the Intel models, reminding us that AMD still lags what it comes to IPC throughput.</p><p>Again, we see performance regressions from Intel's processors in these workloads, which we measured with a Spectre-patched version of Firefox.  </p><h2 id="productivity-6">Productivity</h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ibkoKJ2TpyUz6dw5UQt7SZ.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/vQc7XMGYSrY3oNLX2PK5mJ.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/6s5Q6bECv6WMcMehtUtW3L.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/j7BWeia3882bPAT7Xc3kBh.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ni4w3qD3KqyxPiubK8MZvB.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>The application start-up metric measures load time snappiness in word processors, GIMP, and Web browsers under warm- and cold-start conditions. Other platform-level considerations affect this test as well, including the storage subsystem. Initially, we thought that'd be bad news for Intel's CPUs. After all, the security mitigations have an intense impact on I/O operations. Surprisingly, though, we actually recorded higher results from the Intel-based platforms. Meanwhile, the Ryzen 5 2600X beats AMD's first-gen Ryzen CPUs, but trails the Core i5-8400.</p><p>Our video conferencing workload measures performance in single- and multi-user applications that utilize the Windows Media Foundation for playback and encoding. It also performs facial detection to model real-world usage. Ryzen processors perform well in this test, joining an overclocked Core i7-8700K at the top of the chart. At stock settings, the Ryzen 5 2600X handily dispatches Intel's Core i5-8400.</p><p>The photo editing benchmark measures performance with Futuremark's binaries using the ImageMagick library. Common photo processing workloads also tend to be parallelized, so Ryzen 7 2700X naturally takes a lead. The Ryzen 5 2600X performs well given its price point. And the Intel CPUs all take a hit after we get them patched.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="rendering-encoding-amp-compression-3">Rendering, Encoding & Compression</h2><h2 id="rendering-6">Rendering </h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/hbHhKGQ2qzqLhWj73hFJuB.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/yBNqW3ihayiBxP8YopJKnV.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/taVrircKXii7Z5cDWZfUpg.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/KoDvH5dmZZzQsEt3aMSsuY.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/2zqv9PRtdfoY82DQG4FAfe.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/4xpipzAXJU55SYfkCjdLoK.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/v4joAcwPFjRZzjdxU3kmCC.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/dDcKZ47DhaxCgNnJ5RULfF.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/eNydz6fUFYMdybte55wXUZ.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>Threaded rendering workloads favor Ryzen's SMT-enabled cores. Ryzen 5 2600X slots in right where we'd expect it to land, while Intel's processors suffer slight performance hits after installing the Spectre mitigation patches. </p><h2 id="encoding-amp-compression-5">Encoding & Compression </h2><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/HzGCigTc4uuamgtKG6NN6P.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/Sau9jQmaNnoBQLGBbZUr3V.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/4KyRnnwGRTGQCPmwTBHzKJ.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/eFaADwFdAXekT9YfoM4EcW.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ZSnwhfLDvKsnydcnV74DR7.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/2NGG62svK3HUrP3NNvZ2NR.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/6ob88byeYMKa6mkG5BzD7F.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>LAME is the quintessential example of a single-threaded workload, normally favoring Intel's per-core performance advantage. AMD's 2000-series Ryzen CPUs go a long way in closing the gap by offering better per-core performance than their predecessors.</p><p>Our threaded compression and decompression tests adsorb data directly from system memory, removing storage from the equation. The Ryzen 5 2600X fares well during the test, easily beating Intel's Core i5-8400 and -8600K. Given <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gaming-performance-meltdown-spectre-intel-amd,5457-2.html">Windows' new dual page table addressing structure</a> that prevents Meltdown-based attacks, we expected more performance overhead after the patches. However, the company's latest processors have a PCID (Post-Context Identifiers) feature that accelerates page table translations. As a result, older Core CPUs without the PCID feature are likely affected more than the ones we're testing. </p><p>There's a larger delta between Intel and AMD processors during our HandBrake x265 test compared to the x264 benchmark due to its heavier distribution of AVX instructions. The 2600X slots in where we'd expect given its six cores with SMT technology.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p><h2 id="final-analysis-4">Final Analysis</h2><p>AMD’s Ryzen 5 2600X isn’t quite as impressive as the higher-end Ryzen 7 2700X, but it does offer a solid mixture of performance and value that's well-suited to many different workloads. Whereas professionals might be more interested in the 2700X's eight cores, gamers on a budget will want to check out the 2600X. After all, saving money on other system components is critical at a time when you're certain to pay a premium for discrete graphics.</p><p>In the chart below, we plot gaming performance with both average frame rates and a geometric mean of the 99<sup>th</sup> percentile frame times (a good indicator of smoothness), which we then convert into a frame-per-second measurement. We also have price-to-performance charts that get split up to include CPUs-only and extra platform costs. For the models that don't come with a bundled cooler, we add $25 for a basic heat sink. We also add $20 if overclocking requires a more expensive motherboard (as is the case for Z370). The Intel test results reflect our patched configurations.</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/QKpKdiSKAN2YQCVoM3dNve.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/skUzqN7QR5p3CwUsjqbLyY.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/LtosqbVjj3tFaMSs82MmXV.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/8nmx38orqbK9a9TjHVALmQ.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/HpAojDQ9NVVzdkBhgXVwYK.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/HkW9km3KCCvEC7rDR6kB2e.png" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/TUzwk5voXA4hJnqu2KKNi.png" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>Games show the Ryzen 5 2600X offering a universal improvement over AMD's previous-gen Ryzen 5 1600X. Unfortunately, we see limited gains from overclocking, though that's just as well given this family's meager headroom. More important is that Ryzen 5 2600X beats the Ryzen 7 1800X throughout our suite.</p><p>Intel's Core i5-8600K is also in the 2600X’s crosshairs; AMD takes aim with a significantly lower price, a bundled thermal solution, and compatibility with less expensive motherboards. If you're not worried about overclocking, though, the Core i5-8400 is an even better buy for gaming. It offers nearly the same performance as the 2600X at a ~$50 discount. The i5-8400 drops into value-oriented B-series motherboards and comes with a stock cooler/fan, too.</p><p>Although we're big fans of the Core i5-8400 for entertainment, Ryzen 5 2600X is a smarter all-around value when it has the change to stretch its six cores and 12 threads. The processor distances itself from the i5-8400 in our rendering, encoding, compression, and decompression apps. It even challenges the eight-core Ryzen 7 1700X in several tests, particularly after tuning. That highlights the improvements borne of the Ryzen 2000-series’ enhanced multi-core boost algorithms and lower memory/cache latency.</p><p>Like all of AMD’s processors, the Ryzen 5 2600X comes with an unlocked ratio multiplier. AMD is pushing the frequency/voltage curve to its limits, so we didn’t experience massive gains in some mundane workloads. However, we did see more of a benefit with the 2600X in heavily-threaded tasks compared to the Ryzen 7 2700X. That’s largely due to the 2600X’s lower multi-core boost frequencies.</p><p>We wish AMD was ready with its B450-series motherboards at launch time. But you can still pair the Ryzen 5 2600X with a capable 300-series model.</p><p>The Spectre patches did take some wind out of Intel’s sails in many of our application tests, but the impact varies by application. In most cases, the regressions aren’t severe enough to change our recommendations. Still, it's always disappointing to observe performance stepping backward. Luckily for Intel, gaming wasn't affected much.</p><p>Intel beefed up its Coffee Lake-based Core i5s by adding 50% more cores. Up against the Ryzen 5 1600X, we couldn't help but acknowledge Intel's great performance and generally better compatibility with existing games. This time, however, AMD brings the heat in our benchmarks, while most of its optimization-oriented issues are ancient history. If gaming is your <em>only </em>concern, save some cash and pick up a Core i5-8400. But we think you’ll be happier with the Ryzen 5 2600X, which has more resources to handle general desktop workloads with ease.</p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html">Best CPUs</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html">Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy</a></strong></p><p><br/><strong>MORE: <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/topics/cpus">All CPUs Content</a></strong></p>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ Unboxed! AMD Ryzen 7 2700X & Ryzen 5 2600X 2nd Gen Processors ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.tomshardware.com/picturestory/827-amd-ryzen-7-2700x-ryzen-5-2600x-unboxing.html</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ AMD's "2nd Gen Ryzen" CPUs have landed in our labs. We can’t discuss results yet, but these photos should tide you over until we can talk test results. ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">HCXJrvKXpg24EKsd7dkLak</guid>
                                                                                                <enclosure url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/BkfQzwbZyXoEfBQiqDBLVC-1280-80.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="0"></enclosure>
                                                                        <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                <updated>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 09:50:11 +0000</updated>
                                                                                                                                            <category><![CDATA[CPUs]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[PC Components]]></category>
                                                                                                                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Igor Wallossek ]]></dc:creator>                                                                                    <dc:source><![CDATA[ https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ogLD9JqVHzkUgGLjpstsRK.jpg ]]></dc:source>
                                                                <dc:description><![CDATA[ &lt;p&gt;Igor Wallossek wrote a wide variety of hardware articles for Tom&#039;s Hardware, with a strong focus on technical analysis and in-depth reviews. His contributions have spanned a broad spectrum of PC components, including GPUs, CPUs, workstations, and PC builds. His insightful articles provide readers with detailed knowledge to make informed decisions in the ever-evolving tech landscape.&lt;/p&gt; ]]></dc:description>
                                                                                                                                <cf:isSponsored>false</cf:isSponsored>
                <cf:hasAffiliateLinks>false</cf:hasAffiliateLinks>
                <cf:isPaid>false</cf:isPaid>
                                                                                                                                <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/BkfQzwbZyXoEfBQiqDBLVC-1280-80.jpg">
                                                            <media:credit><![CDATA[null]]></media:credit>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </media:content>
                                                    <media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/BkfQzwbZyXoEfBQiqDBLVC-1280-80.jpg" />
                                                                                                                                                                    <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <h2 id="big-box-little-box">Big Box, Little Box</h2><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:2560px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:66.76%;"><img id="" name="" alt="Big Box, Little Box" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/NY4qCKUkMC5nLjEkG6iaMg.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/NY4qCKUkMC5nLjEkG6iaMg.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="2560" height="1709" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/NY4qCKUkMC5nLjEkG6iaMg.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><p>AMD's so-called "2nd Gen Ryzen" CPUs--and some accompanying components--have landed in our labs. We can’t discuss test results quite yet, but we gathered together some photos to tide you over until we can talk testing and the full spate of features. AMD sent us the pair of black and silver boxes you see here, one labeled with an AMD logo, the other with the now-familiar Ryzen branding. Wonder what's inside? The answer is just a click away.</p><h2 id="inside-the-silver-ryzen-box">Inside the Silver Ryzen Box</h2><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:2560px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:66.76%;"><img id="" name="" alt="Inside the Silver Ryzen Box" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/BkfQzwbZyXoEfBQiqDBLVC.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/BkfQzwbZyXoEfBQiqDBLVC.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="2560" height="1709" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/BkfQzwbZyXoEfBQiqDBLVC.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><p>Here we have the six-core/12-thread Ryzen 5 2600X (with a base clock of 3.6GHz, and a maximum stock clock of 4.2GHz), as well as the new top-end mainstream Ryzen chip, the Ryzen 7 2700X. The latter chip ships with the new, RGB-emblazoned Wraith Prism cooler, and is an eight-core/16-thread part with a base clock of 3.7GHz and a top stock clock of 4.3GHz.</p><h2 id="ryzen-7-2700x-amp-ryzen-2600x-front-amp-center">Ryzen 7 2700X & Ryzen 2600X, Front & Center</h2><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:600px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:75.00%;"><img id="" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/TkvE9t5YeCNpJdFDyv5eY6.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/TkvE9t5YeCNpJdFDyv5eY6.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="600" height="450" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/TkvE9t5YeCNpJdFDyv5eY6.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><p>From above, we don't notice anything really new with these chips. They look like previous Ryzens, and they don't feel substantially heavier or lighter. And there are no riddles to removing the outer packaging of cardboard and plastic.</p><h2 id="on-the-flip-side">On the Flip Side</h2><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:600px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:75.00%;"><img id="" name="" alt="On the Flip Side" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/AV2kfnoegCZNjqo4xjshbL.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/AV2kfnoegCZNjqo4xjshbL.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="600" height="450" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/AV2kfnoegCZNjqo4xjshbL.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><p>The new Ryzens also don't look different from behind. Pins run from one side to the other--be careful not to bend them! And remember that if you plan on dropping one of these new AM4-socket silicon slices into an older AM4 motherboard, you'll first need to update your BIOS to support AMD's new chips.</p><h2 id="the-ryzen-world-gets-more-colorful">The Ryzen World Gets More Colorful</h2><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:2560px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:66.76%;"><img id="" name="" alt="The Ryzen World Gets More Colorful" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/KBCxhXhgFvfVCNzwwiLwLd.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/KBCxhXhgFvfVCNzwwiLwLd.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="2560" height="1709" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/KBCxhXhgFvfVCNzwwiLwLd.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><p>Here we have the new Wraith Prism cooler that comes boxed with the Ryzen 7 2700X. AMD has incorporated trendy, Christmas-tree-like RGB lighting here. We suspect that it looks a whole lot better when lit up, but we aren't allowed to show it plugged in yet. Stay tuned!</p><h2 id="the-return-of-mr-clamp">The Return of Mr. Clamp</h2><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:2560px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:66.76%;"><img id="" name="" alt="The Return of Mr. Clamp" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/zCSaDG5dau5Tqrc9w8idN3.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/zCSaDG5dau5Tqrc9w8idN3.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="2560" height="1709" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/zCSaDG5dau5Tqrc9w8idN3.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><p>It's a pity that AMD's new top-end Wraith Prism cooler incorporates the old fiddly suspension and annoying retaining-clip mounting mechanism. We much prefer the four screws of the Wraith Spire (which now is included with the Ryzen 5 2600X). Sure, you needed to break out a tool to attach that cooler, but installation is easier, and once it's on, it's as stable as a rock.</p><h2 id="not-so-cool-to-look-at-but-probably-cool-enough-for-a-six-core-cpu">Not So Cool to Look At, But Probably Cool Enough for a Six-Core CPU</h2><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:2560px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:66.76%;"><img id="" name="" alt="Not So Cool to Look At, But Probably Cool Enough for a Six-Core CPU" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/GsvfbNXrxVmHNqSUS47Xee.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/GsvfbNXrxVmHNqSUS47Xee.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="2560" height="1709" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/GsvfbNXrxVmHNqSUS47Xee.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><p>As noted on the previous slide, the Ryzen 5 2600X comes with a more basic Wraith Spire cooler in the box. No RGB lights here, but the simple screw connection promises a problem-free (and safer-for-your-fingers) installation. Again, the Wraith Spire lacks blinking lights, but we don't mind stepping over to the dark side...of cooling.</p><h2 id="copper-on-the-bottom">Copper on the Bottom</h2><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:2560px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:66.76%;"><img id="" name="" alt="Copper on the Bottom" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/fHq6bMCXiPr2CKA4VjYJTL.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/fHq6bMCXiPr2CKA4VjYJTL.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="2560" height="1709" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/fHq6bMCXiPr2CKA4VjYJTL.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><p>While it isn't flashy, the Wraith Spire that ships with the Ryzen 5 2600X has many inner strengths. Copper instead of aluminum on the CPU makes for better cooling. (Well, it <em>should </em>make for better cooling, but we can't talk about that aspect of things quite yet.)</p><h2 id="a-memory-step-up">A Memory Step Up?</h2><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:2560px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:66.76%;"><img id="" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/qmibrabEQ3L8yMi5qviX35.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/qmibrabEQ3L8yMi5qviX35.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="2560" height="1709" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/qmibrabEQ3L8yMi5qviX35.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><p>And on to the RAM that AMD included in the larger black box (along with a couple of motherboards that we'll get to in a moment). When Ryzen initially launched last year, it had problems with higher memory clocks. But AMD included a G.Skill DDR4 3400 kit with our review samples this time. The camouflage patterns here are a matter of taste. We suppose they could look nice in a white-themed build.</p><h2 id="motherboard-one-msi-x470-gaming-m7-ac">Motherboard One: MSI X470 Gaming M7 AC</h2><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:2560px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:66.76%;"><img id="" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/rC6xnMnETzzihBRSP4Vmy8.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/rC6xnMnETzzihBRSP4Vmy8.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="2560" height="1709" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/rC6xnMnETzzihBRSP4Vmy8.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><p>As for motherboards, AMD sent a couple of new models our way. With the X470 Gaming M7 AC board, it seems MSI wants to supply a relatively affordable entry into the new world of X470. We'll report later whether it will also withstand all our load tests--but not today.</p><h2 id="motherboard-two-asus-rog-crosshair-vii-hero-x470-wi-fi">Motherboard Two: Asus ROG Crosshair VII Hero X470 Wi-Fi</h2><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:2560px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:66.76%;"><img id="" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/cTEq9Yg8PKyGNKVRXMR9zD.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/cTEq9Yg8PKyGNKVRXMR9zD.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="2560" height="1709" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/cTEq9Yg8PKyGNKVRXMR9zD.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><p>Only the motherboard manufacturers know why boards have funny names. But despite its puzzlingly complex moniker, the Asus ROG Crosshair VII Hero X470 Wi-Fi certainly looks nice (as does the MSI board from the last slide). For the time being, we can only show and not tell, though. Stay tuned for much more about 2nd Gen Ryzen and its accompanying chipsets and motherboards soon.</p><p>But we can add one more important detail: The Ryzen 7 2700X is priced at $329, and the Ryzen 5 2600X slices off $100 (and two cores) for a $229 suggested price. If you've heard enough already and are ready to buy, pre-orders should be available by the time you read this. AMD says its new 2nd Gen Ryzen chips will be on shelves and available April 19th.</p>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ First Ryzen 7 2700X And Ryzen 5 2600 Review Hits The Net ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-review-2700x-2600-ryzen,36683.html</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ Due to an apparent mistake at SiSoftware, the company has published its review of the new Ryzen processors ahead of time. ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">nJuTsLbQERs5XwU66Urb53</guid>
                                                                                                <enclosure url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/eAF4d84F4FU5y6CUtMqvcT-1280-80.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="0"></enclosure>
                                                                        <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                <updated>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 10:06:50 +0000</updated>
                                                                                                                                            <category><![CDATA[CPUs]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[PC Components]]></category>
                                                                                                <author><![CDATA[ palcorn@outlook.com (Paul Alcorn) ]]></author>                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Paul Alcorn ]]></dc:creator>                                                                                    <dc:source><![CDATA[ https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/RZRmFeQfPy3etHjBQitbGW.jpeg ]]></dc:source>
                                                                <dc:description><![CDATA[ &lt;p&gt;As a teenager, Paul scraped up enough money to buy a 486-powered PC with a turbo button (yes, a turbo button). Back when floppies were still popular he was already chasing after the fastest spinners for his personal computer, which led him down the long and winding storage road, covering enterprise storage. His current focus is on consumer processors, though he still keeps a close eye on the latest storage news. In his spare time, you’ll find Paul hanging out with his kids or indulging his love of the Kansas City Chiefs and Royals.&lt;/p&gt; ]]></dc:description>
                                                                                                                                <cf:isSponsored>false</cf:isSponsored>
                <cf:hasAffiliateLinks>false</cf:hasAffiliateLinks>
                <cf:isPaid>false</cf:isPaid>
                                                                                                                                <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/eAF4d84F4FU5y6CUtMqvcT-1280-80.jpg">
                                                            <media:credit><![CDATA[null]]></media:credit>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </media:content>
                                                    <media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/eAF4d84F4FU5y6CUtMqvcT-1280-80.jpg" />
                                                                                                                                                                    <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:829px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:55.01%;"><img id="" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/eAF4d84F4FU5y6CUtMqvcT.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/eAF4d84F4FU5y6CUtMqvcT.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="829" height="456" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/eAF4d84F4FU5y6CUtMqvcT.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><p>Until now, we haven't known quite what to expect from AMD's Pinnacle Ridge Ryzen lineup, but due to an apparent mistake, SiSoftware has published its review of the new Ryzen processors ahead of time. SiSoftware creates professional software applications, such as Sandra, so we know that the company has early access to samples. That means the following data is almost certainly accurate.</p><p>SiSoftware has since removed the review, but we've included screenshots of the test results. Unfortunately, these benchmarks only encompass synthetic tests and do not include gaming data, but it should give us a great idea of what is in store. We also get our first glimpse at the reduced Infinity Fabric Latency, which will undoubtedly improve performance in games.</p><p>These new Pinnacle Ridge models switch from the 14nm LPP process to the 12nm LP process. GlobalFoundries claims the 12nm LP process is 10% faster than the 14nm LPP process, and while all that extra performance will not equate directly to chip-level gains, the new Ryzen processors should have higher frequencies than their predecessors. They should also bring along a denser design and be more economical to produce, so AMD's competitive pricing might get even better.</p><h2 id="the-specs">The Specs </h2><p>SiSoftware listed a snippet of the specifications for these processors, but it is limited. We already know that, being iterative updates, the Ryzen 7 model is 8C/16T while the Ryzen 5 model is 6C/12T. The Ryzen 7 2700X is widely expected to replace the Ryzen 7 1800X series, but we wouldn't rule out the possibility of a 2800X model coming to market eventually. The Ryzen 5 2600X models will replace their 1600X-series counterparts.</p><div ><table><thead><tr><th  ></th><th  ><strong>Ryzen 7 2700X</strong></th><th  ><strong>Ryzen 5 2600</strong></th><th  ><strong>Ryzen 5 1600X</strong></th><th  ><strong>Ryzen 5 1600</strong></th><th  ><strong>Ryzen 7 1800X</strong></th><th  ><strong>Ryzen 7 1700X</strong></th><th  ><strong>Ryzen 7 1700</strong></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th  ><strong>MSRP</strong></th><td  >?</td><td  >?</td><td  >$219</td><td  >$189</td><td  >$349</td><td  >$309</td><td  >$299</td></tr><tr><th  ><strong>Interface</strong></th><td  >1331</td><td  >1331</td><td  >1331</td><td  >1331</td><td  >1331</td><td  >1331</td><td  >1331</td></tr><tr><th  ><strong>Process</strong></th><td  >12nm LP</td><td  >12nm LP</td><td  >14nm LPP GloFo</td><td  >14nm LPP GloFo</td><td  >14nm LPP GloFo</td><td  >14nm LPP GloFo</td><td  >14nm LPP GloFo</td></tr><tr><th  ><strong>Cores/Threads</strong></th><td  >8/16</td><td  >6/12</td><td  >6/12</td><td  >6/12</td><td  >8/16</td><td  >8/16</td><td  >8/16</td></tr><tr><th  ><strong>TDP</strong></th><td  >?</td><td  >?</td><td  >95W</td><td  >65W</td><td  >95W</td><td  >95W</td><td  >65W</td></tr><tr><th  ><strong>Base Freq. GHz</strong></th><td  >?</td><td  >?</td><td  >3.6</td><td  >3.2</td><td  >3.6</td><td  >3.4</td><td  >3.0</td></tr><tr><th  ><strong>All-Core Precision Boost</strong></th><td  >?</td><td  >?</td><td  >3.7</td><td  >3.3</td><td  >3.7</td><td  >3.5</td><td  >3.1</td></tr><tr><th  ><strong>Precision Boost Freq (dual core)</strong></th><td  >?</td><td  >?</td><td  >4.0</td><td  >3.6</td><td  >4.0</td><td  >3.8</td><td  >3.7</td></tr><tr><th  ><strong>XFR Frequency GHz</strong></th><td  >?</td><td  >?</td><td  >4.0</td><td  >3.7</td><td  >4.1</td><td  >3.9</td><td  >3.8</td></tr><tr><th  ><strong>Cache (L3)</strong></th><td  >16MB</td><td  >16MB</td><td  >16MB</td><td  >16MB</td><td  >16MB</td><td  >16MB</td><td  >16MB</td></tr><tr><th  ><strong>Unlocked Multiplier</strong></th><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td><td  >Yes</td></tr></tbody></table></div><p>We have a much deeper look at the cache accommodations at the bottom of the article. In summary, the processors move up to a DDR4-2933 memory frequency, which is a nice upgrade from DDR4-2666 with the previous-gen models. The L1, L2, and L3 cache capacities remain unchanged, although AMD claims that it significantly reduced latency for L2 and L3 caches. SiSoftware's testing below bears that out.</p><h2 id="native-arithmetic-simd-and-cryptography-performance-among-others">Native Arithmetic, SIMD, And Cryptography Performance, Among Others </h2><p>First, we have to caution that SiSoftware generated these test results in its test environment. That means that we can't be entirely sure of the test results. That said, SiSoftware is a highly respected ISV. We use many of these same tests, often in Beta form, for our CPU reviews.</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/QyxchezWQSACwFwbnf2WGV.jpg" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/MNLvKGE4hyvbrWL2H7ftBC.jpg" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/EvWtir2ZEGMo4iK5vhNEHW.jpg" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/LL4bGUnCxGLFVyiScHNm9L.jpg" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/hRyWYgMZoTt86bAFbGweXD.jpg" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/UL8SQMPCGeEuSe2M8bEBjH.jpg" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/KdeZ46P4zYe3fNGU8CcpRa.jpg" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/8xG8zeCyy5YLCiuDjFPzsQ.jpg" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/qdUDZWLz5XQKuqHPKDTCTN.jpg" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/hoChJtJrgZnzWkjtYLbSM9.jpg" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>SiSoftware actually posted two reviews, with the first covering native performance. Here we see appreciable gains across the board in critical workloads such as Dhrystone (integer) and Whetstone (floating point). Improvements hover in the 8-12% range compared to the Ryzen 7 1700X, but a comparison to the Ryzen 7 1800X and a newer Intel Core i7 would have been more desirable.</p><p>Overall, we expect these values to be roughly 5-6% ahead of the 1800X in similar tests. SiSoftware also reports a 10% average performance improvement with vectorized AVX2/FMA code.</p><p>The financial analysis test shows larger gains in the ~25% range, while Scientific and Image processing gain roughly 10%. Overall, a 10% raw performance improvement, which SiSoft attributes largely to frequency enhancements, seems like a solid step forward and is in line with AMD's own projections (Zen+ in the chart below).</p><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' style="max-width:1510px;"><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:31.46%;"><img id="" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/GYerWYS3wwAPDqGYcJD8iM.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/GYerWYS3wwAPDqGYcJD8iM.jpg" align="" fullscreen="1" width="1510" height="475" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull- expandable"><a href='https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/GYerWYS3wwAPDqGYcJD8iM.jpg' target='_blank' class='expand-button icon-expand-image icon' ></a></p></div></div></figure><h2 id="infinity-fabric-cache-amp-memory-latency-and-bandwidth">Infinity Fabric, Cache & Memory Latency and Bandwidth</h2><p>We use SiSoftware's Sandra Business Platinum version and its novel Processor Multi-Core Efficiency test to <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-5-1600x-cpu-review,5014-2.html">measure Infinity Fabric latency</a>. The speed of AMD's Infinity Fabric is tied to the memory clock rate, so improvements yield performance advantages in workloads sensitive to memory latency, like gaming.</p><p>Our test results aren't directly comparable to SiSoft's, largely because this test is extremely sensitive and requires similar hardware platforms for testing. In either case, SiSoft measured appreciable reductions in Infinity Fabric latency across the board. SiSoft also measured a 15% improvement in multi-core bandwidth over the Ryzen 7 1700X.</p><figure role="gallery"><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/maiaehKVJRtzThA9edPaoe.jpg" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/guyQypUfsxGeC5WWbADntj.jpg" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ADHW6gMcetZFDYSGPtvFsd.jpg" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/VgJNaN3N56DpfxZmvBKjoT.jpg" alt="" /></figure><figure><img src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/NDYvamdEKAx8d89jxcrAkT.jpg" alt="" /></figure></figure><p>L2 and L3 Cache bandwidth have also improved by 20-30%. AMD also improved memory latency by 6-8%, but it still lags behind the Intel comparable.</p><h2 id="thoughts">Thoughts</h2><p>AMD redefined the desktop CPU market last year as it returned to being competitive for the first time in several years. Along the way, the company brought us more cores for lower pricing, but it also forced Intel to become more competitive as well. Consider this: at the beginning of 2017 it cost $1,100 for an eight-core Intel processor, but by the end of the year Intel had eight-core models available for $469. Or, you could have just grabbed a $299 AMD eight-core Ryzen 7 1700. That's an amazing pricing improvement in a single year.</p><p>Now, AMD looks to offer more performance with its new Pinnacle Ridge models. Overall the new improvements look impressive, but pricing and other factors will come into play. We expect AMD to continue to pressure Intel with its new models, even as Intel reportedly prepares its own eight-core competitor. Unfortunately, we won't be able to come to any further conclusions until we have the processors in our labs, but it is exciting. Leaks and listings at online retailers are popping up more frequently, so it's evident that AMD's Pinnacle Ridge launch is near.</p><p>The slides below provide further detail about the cache hierarchy, along with a concentrated performance listing (click to expand).</p>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
            </channel>
</rss>