Mini PC specialist GMKtec recently launched the EVO-X3, heralding it as a “next-gen AI workstation,” with early access registration beginning tomorrow (Monday, June 22). The firm also took to social media this weekend to show that the successor to the GMKtec EVO-X2, which we reviewed in February, had earned AMD CEO Lisa Su’s signature of approval. This is not entirely surprising, as so did the X2. So, let’s take a closer look at the new GMKtec EVO-X3.

Actually, the tech specs of the EVO-X3 aren’t very different from its predecessor. We can say with certainty that its design has been thoroughly revamped, though. Look at the difference between the generations. This is a good thing, as most of our reviewers ‘Cons’ regarding the EVO-X2 were drawn from its design and build. Specifically we grumbled about the cheap-feeling case, tricky internal access, and fan noise. A smart redesign would have addressed all these points, but we’d have to get some hands-on time with the new revision to be sure it delivers more than a cosmetic change.

The new GMKtec EVO-X3 is again built around the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 'Strix Halo' processor. Interestingly, a switch to the Ryzen AI Max+ 495 'Gorgon Halo' must have been deemed counterproductive. Many tech enthusiasts were underwhelmed by the AMD Ryzen AI 400 series refresh, too. We also know there are two launch configurations, both with 128GB of LPDDR5X-8000 RAM, but one having a 2TB SSD, the other 4TB. The machine is advertised as featuring two M.2 2280 PCIe Gen4x4 slots for up to 8TB of SSD storage.

As hinted above, the big change between generations appears to be in the build. GMKtec now boasts of the “silent triple fan thermal system” which makes the whole unit somewhat like a triple fan graphics card in a steel wrapper. GMKtec says that “The system is engineered to balance performance, efficiency, and thermal stability, making it suitable for continuous professional workloads across AI and creative scenarios.”

For ports, we note the EVO-X3 packs in an OCuLink connector, USB4 for data, power delivery and video out, and HDMI 2.1 video out. Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 are also on board. There are also a few USB-A ports, an Ethernet jack, and a headset jack.

Prices up, a lot

The GMKtec EVO-X2 launched at $1,499 as tested with 64GB RAM and 1TB SSD. Today, EVO-X2 machines with this configuration are currently being sold for $1,999 on Amazon.com. However, the GMKtec EVO-X3 entry price is far steeper, admittedly with more RAM and storage. It is advertising the 128GB RAM and 2TB SSD version at $3,600, and the 128GB RAM plus 4TB storage version at $3,849. Both of those are said to be pre-launch discounted prices. Signing up for the early access registration can get you an additional $20 off those marked-down prices.

GMKtec told us that the pre-launch is live tomorrow, with purchased units being sent out from July 6.

AMD's Ryzen AI Halo Developer Platform is finally here, with preorders for the powerful $3,999 mini PC now live in the U.S. through Micro Center. The company’s new developer platform is effectively an answer to Nvidia's DGX Spark, as both systems are designed as compact AI workstations capable of running large language models locally. First unveiled at CES 2026, the developer kit is available in two variants that feature identical hardware but ship with different operating systems- Linux or Windows 11 Pro.

Notably, the DGX Spark was originally introduced at the same $3,999 price point last year. However, Nvidia recently increased the price to $4,699 due to the ongoing global supply constraints affecting LPDDR5X memory and NAND flash. Apart from pricing, the Ryzen AI Halo Developer Platform offers native Windows support, whereas the DGX Spark is limited to Linux-based environments. This gives users greater flexibility, including the option to dual-boot and use both operating systems.

The Ryzen AI Halo dev kit is powered by the flagship Ryzen AI Max+ 395 processor, featuring 16 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock speed of 3 GHz and a max boost clock speed of 5.1 GHz. It also features 128GB of unified LPDDR5X-8000 memory, 16MB of L2 cache, and 64MB of L3 cache, onboard RDNA 3.5 Radeon 8060S graphics with 40 compute units, and a dedicated NPU capable of 50 TOPS.

The mini-PC measures 149 x 149 x 43.18 mm, has an aluminum chassis, and includes a 2TB M.2 SSD, while wireless connectivity options include Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4. As for I/O, it is strikingly similar to what Nvidia offers, including a 10 GbE LAN, four USB-C ports (one for power input), and an HDMI 2.1b port. Unfortunately, there is no NVLink, which, in Nvidia’s case, allows two DGK Spark machines to pair. To cool the Strix Halo chip inside AMD, it uses a unique cooling solution that includes a baseplate, direct-touch flat heatpipes, an aluminum channel heatsink, and two lateral airflow blower-style fans.

If you are a developer or simply interested in experimenting with local LLMs, Micro Center is currently accepting preorders for the Ryzen AI Halo Developer Platform, with local pickup available on July 10. Those looking for alternatives can also consider the Corsair AI Workstation 300, a slightly larger AI-focused system based on the same Ryzen AI Max+ 395 processor. It is also currently listed at a lower starting price of $2,699 for the 1TB storage model and $3,399 for the 4TB model.

Following the announcement of Microsoft's Surface Laptop Ultra ahead of Computex, the company is announcing another device with the RTX Spark system on a chip at its developer conference, Build, in San Francisco.

That new PC is the Surface RTX Spark Dev Box. With the company pushing Windows as a platform for agentic AI with Nvidia's new processor, the Surface-branded mini PC is set to run sustained workloads with a 100W thermal envelope — more than you can get in a laptop.

Microsoft says that includes "long-running training jobs, agentic AI pipelines and local model fine-tuning."

The PC has an aluminum chassis with 1,000 air vents in a grid, which looks a bit like the flat top of the Xbox Series X. The system features two USB Type-C ports, HDMI, USB-A, Ethernet, and a headphone jack.

Nvidia states that the RTX Spark can deliver up to one petaflop of AI compute with 128GB of unified memory and can run models with up to 120 billion parameters locally.

The system will come set up for developers, with Visual Studio Code, GitHub Copilot, and other applications preinstalled. Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 (WSL 2) with support for Nvidia's CUDA technology will also come out of the box, along with PowerShell7.

Microsoft hasn't announced a price for the Surface RTX Spark Dev Box, but says it will be available this year at microsoft.com in the United States. While you can't make a pre-order, you can sign up to learn more on the device's web page.

Passive PCs are great for those who like to keep background noise to a minimum in their work environments. Traditionally, passive designs have leaned towards the adoption of ‘quiet’ visual designs, too. But that doesn’t have to be the case, as the new Kubb Mini range demonstrates (h/t Fanless Tech). These compact 3-inch cubes are priced at $500 (€430) and come in some rather vivid red, orange, green, and blue options - as well as staid old black or white.

Well, you can make up your own mind about the compact design and visual appeal of the Kubb Minis. But also please see how minuscule these devices are, given the context of the human hand PR shot (in the gallery below).

Beneath the colorful aluminum exterior

Passive cooling of these PCs isn’t the trickiest, as the CPU options have rather low TDPs. For example, the Intel Twin Lake N150 with 4C/4T and a top speed of 3.6 GHz has just a 6W processor base power. The Core i3 N300 CPU with 8C/8T and a top speed of 3.8 GHz has a slightly higher TDP at 7W. Both CPUs are fabbed at Intel 7 and have 6MB of Intel Smart Cache on board. Neither should be a challenge to a small passive cooling setup.

The $500 (€430) configuration of the Kubb Mini comes with the weaker N150 processor, but it isn’t barebones. The processor is supported by 16GB LPDDR5-4800 RAM, a 256GB NVMe SSD, and Windows 11 Pro comes pre-installed. Opting for the Core i3 N300 CPU, with all else remaining equal, adds $105 (€90) to the checkout price. Neither config can add more than 16GB of RAM, but 512GB and 1TB storage options can be had for more of your hard-earned cash.

You don’t get oodles of connectivity, which isn’t a big surprise. What you do get is: Realtek RTL8111H 1 GbE, Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 + Bluetooth 5.2, 2 × USB 3.2, 2 × HDMI 2.0, 1 × USB 3.2, and 1 × audio 3.5mm. It looks like there is a barrel jack for the 12 V DC power adapter around the back, but the device can also be powered by one of its precious USB-C ports.

Kubb envisions users buying this 3-inch (8cm) square PC for “office tasks, management, accounting or web browsing.” It also heralds the Mini as a great, silent, thin client that uses significantly less power than a traditional desktop PC. Perhaps more appealing to our audience, Kubb reckons the Mini would also be a good choice for “entertainment and retrogaming for the whole family,” plugged into the living room TV while not becoming an eyesore.

Kubb also makes more powerful (larger) fanless designs and its stables, dominated by cube-like solutions, feature wood- and leather-cased PCs, too.

Corsair launched its AI Workstation 300 in the summer of 2025 with AMD's Strix Halo silicon on board to appeal to local LLM enthusiasts looking for a powerful yet compact mini-PC. At the time of our review in February, prices for the top-end Ryzen AI Max+ 395 variant had already risen to around $3,000 from a launch price of around $2,299, and we already criticized its subpar value proposition compared to rivals like the DGX Spark and its GB10 brethren.

Now, all configs of the AI Workstation 300 have gotten even more expensive. The top-of-the-line variant equipped with a Ryzen AI Max 395+ APU, 128 GB of LPDDR5X-8000 RAM, and 4 TB of storage has been bumped up to $3,399.99. Keep in mind that this is the only AI Max 395+ config available on the site, too, since the 1 TB SSD option is out of stock, and you can't down-spec the memory.

If the 1TB model was available, however, it would cost $2,699 now, up $700 from its $1,999 launch price. Finally, the Ryzen AI Max 385 config with 64 GB of RAM and a 1TB SSD has gone from $1,599.99 to $1,699.99, constituting just a $100 hike.

Cumulatively, those make for $1,100, a $700, and $100 price hikes across the board, but in the grand scheme of Strix Halo systems, these prices are pretty much the going rate.

For instance, another popular Ryzen AI Max+ 395 model, the Beelink GTR9 Pro, is going for $2,999 right now, and it comes with only a single 2 TB SSD. Adding another high-end 2TB PCIe 4.0 drive would cost you at least $350 right now, by which point you'd already be in the Corsair model's territory.

We reviewed the ever-popular GMKtec Evo X2 a couple of months ago as well, which is currently priced at $2,349 on Amazon for the same chip and a 2 TB SSD, but only 96 GB of RAM instead of 128 GB. If you want that much memory, you'll have to shell out $3,299, but you only get 2 TB of storage instead of 4 TB on the Corsair. Heck, even the Framework Desktop would be slightly more expensive when configured the same way.

Regardless of the context, Corsair's price changes came without an announcement, so we don't actually have an official reason for the price increase, but it's pretty easy to connect the dots. The ongoing component shortage caused by the AI boom is a likely root cause, and it's been made worse by escalating geopolitical tensions blocking off critical trade routes.

RAM and storage are extremely costly at the moment, even for vendors buying in bulk, so that added cost is going to get passed down to the customer. Recently, Ayaneo even had to halt orders for its upcoming Next 2 handheld featuring Strix Halo chips because the company simply could not get the parts at a reasonable price. But hey, if you're chasing tokens amid AI boom that started all this, maybe it doesn't matter how much pricier your Strix Halo machine gets.

Mini PCs have gained a following over recent years by bringing the best mobile silicon to the desktop. The mix of processing power, the compact chassis, power efficiency, and portability hits a PC sweet spot for many folks. Here we are looking at Hong Kong-based Minisforum’s update to its well-regarded AI X1 Pro 370 from last year – the new Minisforum AI X1 Pro 470. As given away by the name, this model packs one of the latest AMD Gorgon Point mobile processors.

Specifically, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 is installed in this machine, and the mini PC’s relative charms rely on the enhancements delivered by the AMD Ryzen AI 400 series. Sadly, the latest AMD mobile processors offer merely incremental uplifts, leaving enthusiasts underwhelmed. The CPU boost goes 100 MHz higher, and the NPU performance has been lifted from 50 to 55 TOPS in the latest silicon. Nevertheless, we thought it would be worthwhile to gauge the appeal of the new Minisforum AI X1 Pro 470, and check out the top-end AI 400 series laptop chip in a mini PC.

Design of the Minisforum AI X1 Pro 470

The Minisforum AI X1 Pro 470 looks and feels well-made, hewn from premium materials, with nicely tactile buttons, and is reassuringly dense. An obvious comparison is against an Apple Mac Mini M4, but at 7.68 inches square and 1.87 inches tall, the Minisforum would be visibly larger than the Apple (5 x 5 x 2 inches), set side by side.

If getting something Mac Mini-sized with an x86 chip is crucial, Minisforum offers the AI X1 (non-Pro) models, which almost exactly match the Mac’s dimensions. These non-Pro models from Minisforum are a bit cheaper, but they have fewer expansion options, ports, and a less potent cooling system.

One of the design features I appreciate about the Minisforum AI X1 Pro 470 is that it has flexible positioning and mounting options straight from the box. It ships with both a metal VESA mount bracket and fixings, as well as a matching vertical stand. The larger ‘Pro’ models (our test model) also benefit from integrating a 135W PSU, so you only need a common figure-of-8 power lead (supplied) to the wall.

The Minisforum AI X1 Pro 470 has a decent selection of modern ports, mostly front and back. It is good to see OCuLink and 2x USB4 among them, and some will appreciate the dual 2.5G LAN ports at the back. I would have wished for more USB-A ports at the back and a rear audio jack, too.

Other design features of note, which might make this stand out from a raft of rivals, are Minisforum’s integration of a Copilot button on the front of the chassis, its responsive Windows Hello-friendly fingerprint sensor on the top of the chassis, and the inclusion of stereo speakers and dual-array microphones under the hood.

Minisforum AI X1 Pro 470 Mini PC Specifications

Ports and Connectivity of the Minisforum AI X1 Pro 470

While the AI X1 Pro 470 has a wide selection of ports, I’d like more. Having 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A (10Gbps) ports, a USB4 Type-C (40 Gbps, supports Alt DisplayPort 2.0 & 15W PD out), and a 3.5mm Combo Audio Jack on the front, alongside the power and Copilot buttons, is a good start. To the left side, there is a full-sized SD card slot, with a Kensington Lock on the right.

Round the back there are numerous of ports, including another USB4 Type-C (40 Gbps, supports 100W PD-in to power the PC, Alt DisplayPort 2.0, and 15W PD out), another USB Type-A (but USB 2.0), plus an OCuLink Port, HDMI 2.1 FRL, DisplayPort 2.0, 2x 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet (RJ45), and an AC inlet (next to a reset / clear CMOS hole).

That sounds like a lot of variety, but just a single slow USB-A around the back is poor. It means I’ll be using a USB-C dock/dongle at the back, so the front system ports can remain ‘clean’ and available for handy occasional peripheral plugging. On the other hand, this little PC can connect up to four 4K screens simultaneously, straight from the box.

Wireless connectivity is decent. A MediaTek MT7925 Wi-FI 7 Card fitted to the motherboard also provides Bluetooth 5.4 with BLE support.

Upgradability of the Minisforum AI X1 Pro 470

Before even opening up this device, it is pleasing to see that both OCuLink and USB4 are available for fast docking and eGPU connectivity. Inside, there’s quite a bit of room for upgrades, too – especially for a mini PC.

Minisforum provides three M.2 storage slots. With my 32GB/1TB config, one of the slots already has a 1TB drive installed, specifically a Kingston PCIe Gen4 NVMe drive with HMB caching and QLC NAND. Adequate but nothing fancy, it managed peak read and write speeds of almost 5.7 GB/s and 5.0 GB/s, respectively, in ATTO Disk Benchmark. According to the specs, this mini PC can fit three such drives, maxing out at 12TB total capacity (3x 4TB). Extra fittings and thermal pads are supplied in the box.

This ‘AI mini PC’ can pack up to 128GB of DDR5 RAM, using two SODIMM slots. You can buy it barebones direct from Minisforum or Amazon. We received a 32GB/1TB model for testing. These Ryzen AI 300 and 400 chips can be sensitive to memory bandwidth, especially for tasks that lean on the iGPU, so it was unfortunate that the 32GB here was a single DDR5-5600 module. In a ‘normal’ market, we think Minisforum would have supplied 2x 32GB, or a 2x 16GB option, but this 32GB was supplied with a single SODIMM, which seems to be a by-product of the RAMpocalypse.

Adding or changing RAM or storage requires removing five screws from the bottom of the device (1 short, 4 long), followed by 7 further internal screws marked with triangles. Then lift the PSU with the secondary cooling fan gently, as there are three wired connections to the motherboard. You don’t need to detach these cables; there’s enough clearance to lean this assembly to the side, get in, and reach the RAM and SSD slots.

Productivity and AI Performance on the Minisforum AI X1 Pro 470

We tested the Minisforum AI X1 Pro system, and its AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 processor, using the supplied RAM/Storage configuration with Windows 11 pre-installed and the default ‘Balanced’ profile selected in the BIOS. VRAM was set at 8GB in the BIOS.

Taken in isolation, the results look pretty good. However, as I had an Asus Zephyrus G16 with 32GB quad-channel DDR5-7500 RAM at hand (my personal desktop replacement portable), I thought it would be interesting to check the difference between the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Asus laptop, PL1 65W, PL2 70W) and Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (Minisforum mini PC, PL1 60W, PL2 65W).

Due to the aforementioned mini PC RAM configuration, the older-gen, thermally-constrained Asus laptop trounced the new-gen Minisforum challenger. Disappointing. I wanted to see if the Minisforum could fight back if I upgraded it to dual-channel. Luckily, I could source a matching DDR5-5600 SO-DIMM, so I’ve also tabulated those results. Spoiler: the RAM upgrade makes a huge difference, convincingly putting the Gorgon Point processor in the mini PC into pole position most of the time.

Above, you have two popular synthetic CPU benchmarks that concentrate on CPU performance. Then the Procyon AI tests I did looked at AI image generation using the onboard NPU. These results equate to a series of 500x500 pixel AI-generated images being produced from a prompt in Stable Diffusion Lite every 10 or 11s. Last but not least, Handbrake was used to convert a reference 4K/60 HDR nature video to 1080p/30.

Gaming Performance on the Minisforum AI X1 Pro 470

What we said about the single-vs-dual channel memory above applies even more in 3D gaming workloads that need to squeeze the best out of the Radeon 890M iGPU. Most readers will know about the theoretical benefits of improved memory bandwidth for Radeon iGPU graphics performance, but seeing, feeling, and measuring it is something else. We can thank the AI industry for opening our eyes to this and moving an extra matching memory module far beyond an impulse purchase.

As I was thinking this Minisforum AI X1 Pro 470 would be a good candidate for a living room TV connected media box and 'Steam Machine,' I tested Cyberpunk 2077 using the ‘Steam Deck’ preset at 1080p. The system did pretty well after it was upgraded to dual-channel RAM.

Overall, the gaming frame rates of 50-60fps on the dual-channel RAM-equipped X1 Pro 470 point to it being a pretty decent entertainment box for the living room scenario that I was thinking about. With all these tests done at medium settings (except CP2077), there are still plenty of settings that can be adjusted to achieve an average 60fps at 1080p, if you insist on that.

Bottom Line

During even the most demanding tests, the Minisforum AI X1 Pro 470 stayed pleasingly quiet and cool. Running through the benchmarks and stress tests, I didn’t see any processor temperatures rising above the low 70s (Celsius). Moreover, the weighty dual-fan cooling seems to do its job pretty quietly inside the slick metal alloy shell. These are definite advantages over my Zephyrus with Ryzen Ai 9 HX 370.

An unobtrusive fan profile is important to me for long-term use of any PC as a daily driver. I think this system could make the grade, with its idle noise level of 28dBA and highest reading of 32dBA from approximately arms-length away (positioned beside my monitor on the desk).

I’ve enjoyed testing the Minisforum AI X1 Pro 470. It looks good, feels well built, offers flexible mounting and positioning options, and runs cool and quiet. Being able to check it out in dual-channel memory mode also raised my opinion of the device. A decent USB4 dock attached to the rear provides the ports I need, while keeping it tidy, too.

Given the small changes delivered by AMD’s latest mobile chips, bargain hunters might be more interested in the AI X1 Pro 370 from last year, which is still available at $735 barebones, or $1,184 for the 32GB/1TB config. Also, if the AI X1 Pro 470 with 32GB/1TB config we received ($1,379.00 on Amazon) isn’t your little dream machine, the barebones model with HX 470 is just $779. To that, you'd need to add a dual-channel DDR5 SO-DIMM kit, an M.2 SSD, and Windows (or Linux).

Arctic has just released a new mini-PC aimed at enthusiasts looking for a clean, minimalist, and silent setup, without compromising on performance. The "Senza AI 370" is the latest in the company's existing Senza lineup that has shipped with the Ryzen 5000 series so far, but it's now been upgraded to AMD's Strix Point. Specifically, it features the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 flagship APU and a neat trick up its sleeve.

Or should we say "below its sleeve"? Because this mini-PC mounts under your desk, completely out of sight, cable management isn't an issue either. Arctic calls it an "Under Desk PC," and it's designed to clear your workspace. You could put it on top of your desk, but that would defeat its entire purpose. You really want to make sure you get the most out of it because it costs 1200 Euros, or almost $1,400.

For that money, you're getting a top-end chip, the Ryzen AI 370, which has 12 cores and 24 threads that can boost up to 5.1 GHz. It launched almost two years ago, but it was the Red Team's premier laptop offering until Gorgon Point did so a few months ago. It's based on AMD's Zen 5 architecture, featuring 4 standard Zen 5 cores and 8 Zen 5c efficiency cores — both are split off into their own CCX.

Testing has shown that this hybrid core config doesn't suit either performance or efficiency, since any tasks requiring more cores spill over to the Zen 5c CCX, and there's a large latency penalty for cross-CCX communication. But that's mostly a concern for mobile devices (since this is a mobile chip), a wall-powered mini-PC circumvents these issues and gives you solid performance regardless.

The Senza AI 370 looks like an AIO radiator for the most part, down to the two tubes poking out of it that terminate in a front panel hub. This detachable box mounts near the edge of your desk, where you can easily interact with it, as it includes a power button, a couple of USB ports, and a headphone jack. The actual PC is meant to go farther back, toward the rear of your table, where it almost disappears.

The port selection on the PC itself is very strong: you get 2.5 Gbps Ethernet, USB4, HDMI 2.1, and more, plus Wi-Fi 7 for wireless connectivity. Owing to its design, the entire body is essentially a giant heatsink, with the actual PCB only in the middle, occupying about 30% of the chassis. Eight heatpipes run through this heatsink, cooling the APU without any fans, which allows it to be completely silent.

Despite nonexistent noise levels, Arctic is claiming great thermals — 50 degrees Celsius under a gaming load, while a "competitor mini PC" reached 67 degrees Celsius. The company also says the Senza reaches 98 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 (at 1080p High), while a similarly equipped mini PC only reaches 86 FPS. This is possible due to the higher-spec RAM configuration on the Senza.

It features 32 GB of LPDDR5X-8000 memory, while many other devices use standard DDR5 at slower speeds. The Ryzen AI 370 also has a Radeon 890M iGPU, which is fairly performant for integrated graphics. It's no Strix Halo, but it will get the job done in lightweight games, and can produce decent results in AAA titles with upscaling. It's got 16 RDNA 3.5 Compute Units and can boost up to 2.9 GHz.

To round out the device, other specs include a 1 TB PCIe 4.0 SSD, support for up to 8K external monitors, pre-installed Windows 11, and, of course, Microsoft Copilot+ branding for AI workloads. You can buy the Senza AI 370 right away from Arctic's website, and while it does cost 1,200 Euros, we noticed that a 170 Euros payback is automatically applied, bringing the price down to 1,029 Euros ($1,192). That's still quite a lot for this performance tier.

Nvidia has announced a price increase for its DGX Spark AI mini-PC powered by the GB10 Grace Blackwell Superchip. As per Nvidia’s official developer forums, the company is raising the price due to the constrained memory supplies worldwide. The MSRP has now been revised from $3,999 to $4,699, a substantial increase of $700. Nvidia also notes that while the new pricing is already reflected on Nvidia.com, other sales channels may take longer to update.

First showcased at CES 2025 as Project Digits, Nvidia started selling the DGX Spark in October 2025 after facing a delay in May. An AI supercomputer that can easily fit on your desk, the DGX Spark is highly portable, measuring just 5.9” by 5.9” by 2”, and is ideal for AI developers, researchers, and data scientists. According to Nvidia, it has been custom-tailored to the needs of local AI inference and development and can run inferences on many of today's popular AI models.

The GB10 Grace Blackwell Superchip powering the DGX Spark has been made in collaboration with MediaTek, featuring 10 Arm Cortex-X925 and 10 Cortex-A725 CPU cores and a Blackwell GPU capable of delivering up to 1 petaFLOP of AI inferencing performance. There's also 128GB of LPDDR5X coherent unified memory that can be shared between the CPU and GPU, as well as a 4TB NVMe SSD for storage. The device itself features a USB-C power input, three USB-C 20Gbps ports with DisplayPort alt mode support, an HDMI 2.1a port, a 10Gb Ethernet port, and two QSFP ports for the onboard ConnectX 7 NIC running at up to 200 Gbps.

With the ability to support up to 200-billion-parameter models locally (assuming FP4 quantization), one can even connect two of these units using the built-in Nvidia ConnectX 7 NIC to gain double the performance. The DGX Spark runs on Nvidia’s DGX OS, which is based on Ubuntu and supports the CUDA software stack, which has become crucial for AI development. Nvidia has also roped in a range of software partners to ensure that their tools work well with DGX Spark, including Anaconda, Cadence, ComfyUI, Docker, Google, Hugging Face, JetBrains, LM Studio, Meta, Microsoft, Ollama, and Roboflow.

If you're interested in the DGX Spark, several OEM partners, including Dell, Asus, MSI, and HP, also offer similarly designed systems built around comparable hardware, delivering similar levels of performance. In fact, the Asus Ascent GX10 is a solid alternative to the DGX Spark as it is cheaper at $3,266.53, with the only difference being a smaller 1TB SSD.

Nvidia confirmed the updated pricing for the DGX Spark took effect this week, but that existing orders will be honored at the pricing at the time of ordering. No hardware changes have been made to the device as part of the increase.

NZXT has today announced the introduction of its new potent H2 Mini PC, with both AMD and Intel configurations for compact desktop gaming. Alongside the new H2 Mini PC (U.S. only), it has also released the new H2 Flow Mini-ITX Case and the compact C850 SFX power supply for builders who want to put together their own compact PC.

• H2 Flow Mini-ITX Case $149.99 / €149.99 EMEA / $149.99 APAC / £129.99 UK
• C850 SFX Power Supply $199.99 AMER / €159.99 EMEA / $159.99 APAC / £139.99 UK
• H2 Mini PC (US Only) $3,499 (Intel and AMD)

As noted, NZXT is offering gamers the choice of a pre-built machine or a DIY option thanks to its new H2 Flow case. To begin with, the PC first, the H2 Mini can be specced with either an AMD 9800X3D or an Intel 285K CPU, seated in either a Gigabyte B850I Aorus Pro or a Gigabyte Z890I Aorus Ultra motherboard, respectively. Gigabyte also supplies the RTX 5080 GPU. There's 32GB of RAM, a 2TB M.2 SSD, Kraken Elite 240 AIO, and Windows 11 Home OS. Strangely, the new C850 SFX PSU doesn't seem to feature in the pre-built, which is powered by a Lian Li SP 850W PSU instead.

H2 Flow Mini-ITX Case

If DIY is more your speed, the new H2 Flow is a vertical Mini-ITX case. Like all of NZXT's Flow models, this case is all about airflow. The case is a 20.7L unit, measuring 435mm in height, 181mm in width, and 263mm in depth, according to early retail listings. The case can support AIO coolers of up to 280mm, as well as graphics cards of up to 331mm. All sides of the case feature mesh panels, which can be removed without tools, and there's some built-in velcro for cable management. When you buy the case, you also get a PCIe 5.0 riser cable for your GPU, and two pre-installed F120W 3-pin fans.

C850 SFX Power Supply

NZXT's new C850 SFX power supply is ATX 3.10certified, with an 80 Plus Gold rating and a 92 mm fluid dynamic bearing fan, which includes a Zero RPM mode for silent operation. It comes with a 600W 12V-2x6 connector for hefty graphics cards, and is fully modular in its design. NZXT says safety protections ensure it is shielded from overcurrent, overvoltage, and overheating, and that its 100% Japanese capacitors are rated at temperatures of up to 105 degrees C. The PSU is backed by a 10-year warranty.

Available now

As mentioned, all three new items including the Mini PC are available now for the following prices:

• H2 Flow Mini-ITX Case $149.99 / €149.99 EMEA / $149.99 APAC / £129.99 UK
• C850 SFX Power Supply $199.99 AMER / €159.99 EMEA / $159.99 APAC / £139.99 UK
• H2 Mini PC (US Only) $3499 (Intel and AMD)

IoT specialist M5Stack has released an alluring, translucent, RGB-infused, tetrahederal mini-PC dubbed the AI Pyramid Computing Box. Despite its curb-appeal, and great connectivity, computing enthusiasts should be clear that this cute little computer is designed for local-AI and edge deployment. M5Stack’s octa‑core Cortex‑A55 and NPU-powered box of tricks isn’t really a contender to replace your x86 productivity and gaming workhorse.

So, we’ve established the purpose of the AI Pyramid, let’s look closer at the compelling specs for edge-AI purposes. This delightful device is based around an Axera AX8850 SoC, which integrates an octa-core Arm Cortex-A55 processor, a 24 TOPS INT8 NPU, and 8K H.264/H.265 hardware encode/decode engines.

With the 4GB model ($199) there is 2GB available to the system and 2GB reserved for the NPU and video engines. M5Stack’s AI Pyramid Pro 8GB model ups the split to 4GB/4GB. Even the higher-spec model would be stingy for a desktop Linux OS, which is one of the major reasons we said this isn’t going to find favor as a general purpose mini-PC.

M5Stack reckons that the true sweet spot deployments of its AI Pyramid will include: AI PC & Edge Intelligent Terminals; Smart Interactive Devices such as Home Assistant, AIGC, voice cloning, meeting transcription; AI Vision Gateways; Local AI Smart Photo Album (Immich); and AI-Powered Intelligent Security (Frigate).

For hardware clarity, we’ve tabulated the full, extensive specs list of the AI Pyramid Computing Box, below.

Additionally, the M5Stack AI Pyramid comes with some nice frills such as the headlining RGB lighting (consisting of 48 LEDs in four segments), a small 32×128 pixels OLED status display, quad-microphones, a built-in speaker, is cooled by a single thermal sensing active fan, and has two user-configurable buttons.

M5Stack's compact translucent device comes in at an almost impulse-buy price (in 4GB and 8GB versions). Maybe that’s why it has completely sold out so quickly. Hopefully, we will see restocks soon, without any RAMpocalypse-style inflation changing those sticker prices for the worse.

Minisforum let me go hands-on with its CES 2026 Innovation Award-winning Mini Workstation, so to get a grasp of what the diminutive new Minisforum MS-02 Ultra could offer, I decided to see if it could replace my aging but capable desktop PC.

This is a true David vs Goliath battle, at least in terms of physical presence. The sub-5-liter MS-02 Ultra battles with my much larger desktop system packed into a 55-liter Fractal Define S PC case. However, the result of the clash wasn’t as clear-cut as I expected, making me wonder what kind of PC I should be using daily in 2026.

Before we get into a specifications table, where you can see exactly how these two systems compare feature-by-feature, it is important to highlight the physical differences. The MS-02 Ultra is an incredible 11 times smaller than my Define S-desktop system. Obviously, such a small size means there are sacrifices to be made in terms of expandability, configurability, thermals, and noise. But those limitations are counterweighted by the benefits of the device being much physically smaller. Dare I say, the Minisforum is kind of portable, and even cute, which is not something I could say about the Define S PC.

The table below makes clear the specs of the Minisforum MS-02 Ultra workstation against those of the system it will have to battle on my desk.

CPU and GPU showdown

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX should be much more capable than the i5-14400F that I bought at Amazon for $115 last year. It tempts with the advantages of its modern Intel architecture, higher clock boost, and easily outguns my Raptor Lake Refresh chip on core count. Moreover, the new platform brings quite a lot of modern niceties. Particularly welcome, from my perspective, are the trio of really fast USB4 (including 2x USB4 v2) ports, all with DisplayPort capabilities.

A distinct advantage I expected in moving to the MS-02 Ultra was from the increased core count using Intel’s more modern architecture. Indeed, CPU-heavy benchmarks would show the new chip could convincingly eclipse the old mid-range Core i5-14400F in both single- and multicore workloads, given sufficient power supply and cooling capacity. But, we'll see how that translates to ‘Mark’s world’ of computing in the benchmarks section, below.

I’ll stress again that a brief check of the specs, ahead of any actual comparison testing, may suggest the little Minisforum would win hands-down in CPU-focused processing tasks, but the best consumer-grade GPU I could get to fit inside its sub-5-liter chassis would be crushed by the triple-fan behemoth in my ATX desktop. Indeed, that is sort of what happened. There are nuances, though, especially as I don’t really play any AAA or eSports PC games that launched in the 2020s, or dabble in local AI.

The MS-02 Ultra runs using the integrated graphics on the Core Ultra 9 285HX by. default. However, there’s a PCIe5.0 x16 slot, and incredibly, there’s room to install a two-slot low profile (LP) graphics card. This, plus the spare 8-pin connector from the built-in 350W PSU, allowed me to install a Gigabyte RTX 5060 OC LP GPU.

Nvidia’s RTX 5060 seemed to be the best graphics card choice for me, as a generalist/hobbyist PC user, though I’ve seen other early adopters of the MS-02 Ultra install cards like the Intel Arc Pro B50 (16GB), Nvidia RTX Pro 4000 Blackwell SFF (24GB), and the RTX 4000 SFF Ada (20GB). These offer far more VRAM but can cost a lot more, too. But thanks to this mini workstation allowing for GPU upgrades, perhaps the RTX 6060 or RTX 7060 will arrive one day with more than 8GB of VRAM on board, and in a low-profile form factor. Or maybe AMD will make a performant LP form factor card in the meantime.

More on specs

I chose my Fractal Define S-housed desktop's motherboard as it was one of the few B760 chipset boards with a USB-C 20 Gbps port as standard at the price point. So, getting three times more USB-C ports, with two of them supporting up to 80 Gbps as standard, on the compact MS-02 Ultra was a welcome platform boost. I’m sure there is potential here for some very useful docking or even eGPU use-cases.

I have a pair of Crucial X10 Pro 4TB devices for keeping games, TV, and movie libraries portable. My testing confirmed the USB4 v2 ports on the front work at full USB 3.2 Gen 2×2 (20 Gbps) speeds with the X10 Pro. Some USB4 controllers surprisingly don’t support Gen 2x2 and would fall back to 10 Gbps mode. My X10 Pros run about a third of the speed of the built-in M.2 SSD provided by Minisforum, but I feel they are good for external, highly portable units.

An extra two 25 GbE network ports and two of the available M.2 SSD slots are provided by a pre-installed low-profile card in the MS-02 Ultra’s PCIe 4.0 x16 slot. However, I chose to replace that with a cheap USB Type-A 3.0 card with four ports, as I really like to have lots of USB ports. My old desktop used a USB adaptor for Wi-Fi 6 and didn’t have Bluetooth. The MS-02 has built-in Intel BE200 Wi-Fi 7 and BT 5.4 card.

There are three PCIe slots in the MS-02 Ultra, but adding the GPU takes up the room where two single-slot add-in-cards would otherwise fit. That compares poorly with my Define S desktop, which has five slots. With a bulky GPU fitted in that ATX system, it was still possible to add another three single-slot PCIe cards. Again, I have one installed in there, bristling with extra USB ports.

Preparing for my personal benchmark battle

The most demanding things thrown at my PC are video editing and games like The Division 2 and Far Cry 5. The Cyberpunk 2077 benchmark is just there for an added reference point, (I bought it, but I’ve not actually got around to playing it yet.) The same goes for Shadow of the Tomb Raider. I also like playing in Borderlands GOTY Enhanced Edition, Command & Conquer Generals, and Amiga Forever – but those are so old and lightweight they weren’t worth testing for this performance comparison.

Most of the time, my computer will be used for little more than multiscreen word processing and browsing, communicating with work colleagues, and a touch of ancient Photoshop and Illustrator dabbling. These help me prepare artwork for here on Tom’s Hardware, some YouTube stuff, as well as laser cutting and engraving. Also, Photoshop has recently been replaced by the Affinity suite.

So, without further ado, let’s get into those benchmarks, which unashamedly revolve around my personal general-purpose computer use, with a few gaming classics thrown in. I’ve also included a ‘tweener’ system, where my large desktop was fitted with the incongruously tiny RTX 5060 LP card.

Minisforum MS-02 Ultra productivity performance

The comparison table above doesn’t offer much in the way of surprises. The MS-02 Ultra with Intel’s Core Ultra 9 285HX does exceedingly well in CPU-intensive tests, particularly those that take advantage of the abundance of available threads. We see the 285HX is a star performer in Cinebench R23, with single-thread scores similar to desktop processors like the Core i9-14900K and Ryzen 9 9950X. For multicore, you are also good to compare with the Ryzen 9 7950X3D and i9‑14900F, but the unlocked i9‑14900K starts to pull ahead convincingly.

I also think the 7-Zip (de)compression benchmark shows the MS-02 mini workstation in a good light. Handbrake 4K transcoding wasn’t much better compared with my old 14400F, though. Meanwhile, PassMark Performance Test, a mix of CPU, graphics, memory, and disk tests, showed some worthwhile performance benefits from the Minisforum – when the RTX 5060 was installed.

Minisforum MS-02 Ultra gaming performance

It is almost moot to highlight that the Define S desktop with Radeon RX 9070 would dominate in 3D games and 3D benchmarks. Nevertheless, there were some interesting results showing that the Ultra 9 285HX / RTX 5060 didn’t always beat the i5-14400F / RTX 5060 due to titles simply being ‘GPU-limited.’ An interesting outlier was the crazy-town USA-set Far Cry 5, where Ubisoft’s Dunia Engine 2 (a modified CryEngine) seemed to prefer the desktop Raptor Lake Refresh under the hood. All the games were tested in 1440p, with no upscaling or frame-gen tech applied.

Minisforum MS-02 Ultra power consumption and noise

Now we move into an area of both strength and weakness for the Minisforum MS-02 Ultra. In my benchmarks table, above, I also included power and noise readings. Starting with the good news, the MS-02 requires less power while idling and doing light tasks – like writing this. It also uses about 120W less when gaming, and all the titles I enjoy play smoothly enough on the RTX 5060 system at high to ultra settings at 1440p without the use of any scaling or frame gen tech.

Some bad news for the mini workstation is that it is more audible when idling and under load, in my experience. Initially, I measured both systems from about arm’s length distance. My Define S desktop uses large Noctua fans and sits under the desk, and in the comparison results, you see that even using the tiny RTX 5060 didn’t increase the noticeable system noise – it is hard to be 100% confident about the 1dBA difference observed.

Having the MS-02 Ultra at arm's length from my seated position, but on the desk top, the noise level was quite high at 48 dBA under load, as per the above chart. However, sitting it under the desk, where the big DIY desktop PC was previously located, reduced the max noise level to 41 dBA. But it's a far smaller system, and when positioned in the space vacated by the Define S, the Minisforum front panel moves beyond arm's reach under the desk. It is necessary to bend quite low from the chair to reach the power button and front I/O, which isn't convenient. That's why I decided to keep it on the desk.

I also note that the Minisforum BIOS has various fan modes (quiet, balanced, and performance) and manual tweaking of the trio of system fans. I ran it at ‘Balanced,’ so there’s probably some tuning that could be done for better noise performance.

Bottom line

In some many ways, the Minisforum MS-02 Ultra held its own against my old home-built Goliath.. The pint-sized challenger does everything I need, and some more. There are clear advantages to be had in CPU-heavy workloads. In GPU-heavy tasks and gaming, there’s clearly enough juice for my particular needs today. If you think about the future, then unlike many other mini PCs, this one can get upgraded with a faster next-generation low-profile graphics card (and other compact PCIe cards) if and when they arrive at an affordable price.

I’ll continue to work on configuring the fans, with an eye on processor and memory temperatures, as the louder fans are the one aspect of the MS-02 Ultra that pokes me in the ribs. It may also be repositioned further back on the desk or under it to scale back its audible presence. The fan noise isn’t high-pitched, and I sometimes forget it, but less is more.

We must also talk about the price of the Minisforum MS-02 Ultra mini workstation. As of the this writing, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX model with 2x 25 GbE PCIe SFP+ NIC, 32GB DDR5, plus a 1TB M.2 PCIe4x4 SSD, and Windows 11 Pro is priced at $1,583.90 from Amazon.com. You can also go barebone (no RAM, SSD, or OS) for $1,229.90 using a $300 discount coupon on the page, which could be a great option if you have a spare DDR5 SO-DIMM, M.2 SSD, and can source your own OS. As with all PCs at this time, prices are very volatile.

The Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 OC LP 8G I bought to go in this system's PCIe ​5.0 x16 slot is currently $359 at Newegg. This was a necessary extra to indulge in the type and quality of gaming fun that I am used to.

Thus, for the Minisforum MS-02 Ultra 32GB/1TB with RTX 5060 LP graphics card installed, as tested, today's total price would be $1,942.90. Things have gotten a little pricier since I began my tests in early January, but that's the way the PC market is going.

We could talk about the comparison between the MS-02 Ultra build/cost and a desktop, with the latter offering much better value and expandability or upgradeability. However, getting something this performant yet compact, with this level of I/O spec and expandability, is going to be impossible with off-the-shelf parts. In this way, and especially for those with a use for the 2x 25 GbE PCIe SFP+ NIC, this mini workstation is a uniquely attractive package.

Mid-tower desktops provide the best performance for the money, but mini PCs have carved a niche by offering surprising muscle in far smaller, more efficient packages. GMKtec’s Evo X2 AI Mini PC ($1,499 as tested) is an excellent example, pairing AMD’s “Strix Halo” Ryzen AI Max+ 395 mobile processor with 64GB or 128GB of memory to provide ample headroom for multitasking and AI development. Its Radeon 8060S integrated graphics even make 1080p gaming surprisingly viable.

For what’s here, it’s arguably a better value than the Framework Desktop, though it remains quite expensive relative to the performance you can get from our best gaming PCs – especially if you don’t truly need 64GB of RAM.

Design of the GMKtec Evo X2 AI Mini PC

The Evo X2 isn’t a style-first or even a style-second machine. Its two-tone black and silver chassis gives it some contrast, but the overall aesthetic feels dated, as if it could have debuted a decade ago. The green power button doesn’t help, leaning more towards budget gadget aesthetic than premium mini-desktop looks.

Although the chassis looks like it could rest horizontally, the ventilation perforations along one side force a vertical‑only orientation. There’s also no VESA mounting support, so it must live on your desk. Fortunately, its 3.03 x 7.6 x 7.32‑inch footprint is small enough that placement shouldn’t be an issue. It’s more compact than the Framework Desktop (3.8 x 8.9 x 8.1 inches), but GMKtec’s reliance on a hefty external 230‑watt power brick undermines some of the space savings.

Build quality is respectable. The lower half of the chassis is sturdy aluminum while the upper shell is plastic but doesn’t feel flimsy. Inside, the CPU fan includes RGB lighting, though it isn’t controllable through Windows Dynamic Lighting or any bundled software. Instead, lighting is managed through a physical “fan mode” button that cycles through static colors and a handful of simple effects like breathing and color‑shift. The other button on the chassis, P-mode, switches between three performance modes. The default seems to be high performance, with the other two designed to reduce fan noise at the expense of performance. An icon briefly pops up in the middle of your screen when the performance mode is changed, displaying a symbol: a dial for high-performance and variations of a flower for the other two – and fades away after a couple seconds.

GMKtec Evo X2 AI Mini PC Specifications

Ports and Upgradeability on the GMKtec Evo X2 AI Mini PC

GMKtec includes an impressive variety of ports, starting on the front panel with a USB4 (USB-C) port, two USB-A 3.2 Gen2 ports, a 3.5 mm audio jack, and a full-size SD card reader.

The rear shelf features DisplayPort 1.4 and HDMI 2.1 video output, USB4, USB-A 3.2 Gen2, two USB 2.0 ports, a 3.5 mm audio jack, and 2.5 Gbps Ethernet. All told, the system natively supports four monitors.

For wireless, the system supports the latest Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 standards courtesy of a MediaTek MT7925 networking card. The wireless antennas are built into the case, so there are no external protrusions.

Upgrading the Evo X2 AI Mini PC is tricky. With the CPU/GPU and RAM soldered, only the two M.2 drives can be upgraded. Accessing these requires peeling off the rubber feet and removing the Philips-head screws underneath. This allows the smaller top half of the chassis to come free, revealing the two M.2 slots.

Removing the rubber feet is difficult since they’re secured with adhesive. I used a plastic toothpick to get under them, then slowly pulled them free with my fingers. The adhesive becomes much less effective once the feet are taken off, though it remained sticky enough for the one time I reapplied them.

Gaming and Graphics on the GMKtec Evo X2 AI Mini PC

Our Evo X2 review unit features a Ryzen AI Max+ 395 processor, Radeon 8060S graphics, and 64GB of LPDDR5X-8000 memory. Though integrated, the Radeon chip is more than powerful enough for 1080p gaming.

For my game testing, I used Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order at 1920 x 1080 with Epic visual quality settings. I saw 90-110 frames per second in most instances, with occasional dips into the 70 FPS range for complex scenes, and spikes over 120 FPS in cutscenes. The game always seemed fluid.

For comparison, we’re using the Framework Desktop, which features the same hardware. We are testing at a 1920 x 1080 resolution since modern 4K gaming still isn’t practical on integrated graphics.

These mini-PCs are evenly matched for the most part, with the edge going to the Evo X2 in Shadow of the Tomb Raider (91 versus 87 FPS), Cyberpunk 2077 (28 versus 22 FPS), and Red Dead Redemption 2 (62 versus 57 FPS). The pair was within one FPS in Far Cry 6, but the Evo X2 produced far lower numbers in Borderlands 3 (78 versus 103 FPS), which may have been an anomaly.

Our tests are run at demanding settings, particularly in Cyberpunk; reducing the settings a notch or two can yield much higher FPS. We would expect any modern game to be playable on the Evo X2 at a 1920 x 1080 resolution.

To stress test gaming PCs, we run the Metro Exodus benchmark 15 times sequentially at RTX settings to simulate half an hour of gaming. During the test, the Evo X2 averaged 57 FPS across all runs with less than 1 FPS variation between tests, indicating stable thermal performance. The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 ran at an average temperature of 61 C.

Fan noise proved louder than expected on this mini PC, with the fans becoming audible across my living room while running our CPU benchmarks. However, during gaming, the fans were much more controlled since the CPU was not being fully stressed.

Productivity Performance on the GMKtec Evo X2 AI Mini PC

We tested the Evo X2 featuring AMD’s Ryzen AI Max+ 395 processor, 64GB of memory, and a 1TB SSD. Despite being a mobile chip, the 395 has no trouble powering through demanding workloads, from heavy multitasking to AI‑accelerated tasks.

Unified memory sets Strix Halo apart. Because the GPU draws from system RAM, the 64GB model can allocate up to 32GB for graphics, while the 128GB configuration can expose a massive 96GB to the GPU. That’s an extraordinary amount of GPU-addressable memory for any PC, let alone one this compact.

The Evo X2 and the Framework Desktop produced almost indistinguishable results in our Handbrake and Geekbench CPU tests, an unsurprising result considering both use the same CPU. The Evo X2 disappointed in our 25GB file transfer test, though; we’d forgive that on a barebones PC where you supply your own drive, but the Evo X2 arrives fully equipped.

Software and Warranty

Almost nothing is installed on the Evo X2 beyond an “AIPC” app, which requires a login but doesn’t provide a way to create one. I did so by going to GMKtec’s online store and registering there. It took several minutes to receive a verification code, which went to my spam folder.

The app isn’t specific to the Evo X2 AI Mini PC – there are no device-specific settings. Instead, you get a DeepSeekV3 prompt and the ability to add other large language models. It seems like it could be useful for local AI development and adds value since everything is local, protecting your privacy. GMKtec has a blog post explaining which models are compatible with the Evo X2. Buyers intending to use larger parameter models should carefully note that some models don’t work with just 64GB of RAM, requiring the 128GB Evo X2.

GMKtec includes a one-year warranty.

GMKtec Evo X2 AI Mini PC Configurations

All GMKtec Evo X2 AI Mini PCs feature the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 processor with integrated Radeon 8060S graphics. MicroCenter offered our review model with 64GB of RAM and a 1TB SSD for $1,499, with a 128GB/2TB model for $2,299. Amazon has our review model listed at $1,699.99, but it is listed as "temporarily out of stock" as of this writing.

GMKtec also sells the system directly, starting with our review model for $1,499, a 96GB/2TB model for $1,799.99, and a 128GB/2TB system for $2,199.

GMKtec undercuts the Framework Desktop on price, which starts at $1,639 with the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and 64GB of RAM, but before adding storage, an OS, and its required add-ons to get it up and running.

Bottom Line

GMKtec’s Evo X2 is an appealing mini‑PC for anyone who wants strong CPU performance, abundant GPU‑addressable memory, and respectable 1080p gaming in a small footprint. While it's not as compact as the Framework Desktop because of its external power brick, it’s still dramatically smaller than a mid‑tower and easily fits on a desk. We also noted its excellent connectivity, Wi-Fi 7, and ability to drive four displays.

Its value hinges on your workload. The 128GB configuration delivers a massive 96GB of GPU‑addressable memory, making it a standout option for local AI development at a price far below traditional workstations (assuming you're willing to use AMD's software), and considerably cheaper than the Framework Desktop.

For pure gaming, though, it's not as appealing – a mid‑tower will deliver far better performance per dollar. But for creators, tinkerers, and anyone who can exploit its memory and AI capabilities, the Evo X2 is one of the strongest deals in the mini‑PC space.

Editor's Note, February 4: This review was originally published with the wrong gaming charts. This has been rectified. We regret the error.

The fruits of the AI gold rush thus far have frequently been safeguarded in proprietary frontier models running in massive, remote, interconnected data centers. But as more and more open models with state-of-the-art capabilities are distilled into sizes that can fit into the VRAM of a single GPU, a burgeoning community of local AI enthusiasts has been exploring what’s possible outside the walled gardens of Anthropic, OpenAI, and the like.

Today's hardware hasn’t entirely caught up to the rapid shift in resources that AI trailblazers demand, though. Thin and light x86-powered "AI PCs” largely constitute familiar x86 CPUs with lightweight GPUs and some type of NPU bolted on to accelerate machine learning features like background blur and replacement. These systems rarely come with more than 32GB of RAM, and their relatively anemic integrated GPUs aren’t going to churn through inference at the rates enthusiasts and developers expect.

Gaming GPUs bring much more raw compute power to the table, but they still aren't well-suited to running more demanding local models, especially large language models. Even the RTX 5090 "only" has 32GB of memory on board, and it’s trivial to exhaust that pool with cutting-edge LLMs. Getting the model into RAM is just part of the problem, too. As conversations lengthen and context lengths grow, the pressure on VRAM only increases.

If you want to get more VRAM on a discrete GPU to hold larger AI models, or more of them at once, you're looking at professional products like an $8500+ RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell and its 96GB of GDDR7 (or two, or three, or four). And that’s not even counting the cost of the exotic host system you’ll need for such a setup. (Can I interest you in a Tinybox for $60K?)

The hunger for RAM extends to other common AI development tasks, like fine-tuning an already trained AI model for better performance on domain-specific data or quantizing an existing model to reduce its resource footprint for less powerful systems.

In the face of this endless hunger for RAM, systems with large pools of unified memory have become attractive platforms for those looking to explore the frontiers of local AI. Apple paved the way with its M-series SoCs, which in their latest and greatest forms pair as much as 512GB of LPDDR5 and copious memory bandwidth with powerful GPUs.

And AMD’s Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (aka Strix Halo) platform has found a niche as a somewhat affordable way to get 128GB of RAM alongside a relatively powerful GPU for local LLM tinkering.

But none of those systems natively support Nvidia’s CUDA, which remains the dominant software platform for AI development the world over. Enter the DGX Spark, first announced all the way back at CES 2025, which brings the combo of a high-performance Arm CPU and a Blackwell GPU to desktops for the first time alongside full support for the CUDA ecosystem.

The centerpiece of the DGX Spark is Nvidia’s GB10 SoC, which combines a MediaTek-produced Arm CPU complex joined together with a Blackwell GPU on one package. Both of these chiplets are fabricated on a TSMC 3nm-class node, and they’re joined together by Nvidia’s coherent, high-bandwidth NVLink C2C interconnect. Those chips share a coherent 128GB pool of LPDDR5X memory that offers a tantalizing canvas for pretty much any common AI workload you can think of.

Ports, external stuff, operating system and software

The Spark itself is a pretty straightforward mini PC. It measures just 5.9” by 5.9” by 2” (150mm by 150mm by 50.5mm) for a volume of just 1.1 liters.

The Founders Edition version we’re reviewing today has a spiffy gold finish with a metal foam front and back panel for ventilation. The “rack handles” at the front of the device conceal air intakes, but the top and sides are otherwise featureless.

Flip the Spark over, and you see another air intake along the bottom edge, as well as a removable rubber foot that conceals the wireless networking antennas and allows for access to the user-replaceable M.2 2242 SSD. Our unit came with a 4TB drive.

Around back, you get a power button, one USB-C power input, three USB-C 20Gbps ports with DisplayPort alt mode support, an HDMI 2.1a port, a 10Gb Ethernet port, and two QSFP ports for the onboard ConnectX 7 NIC running at up to 200 Gbps. That exotic NIC lets you cluster a pair of Sparks together for experimentation with Nvidia’s NCCL distributed computing libraries.

If the Founders Edition Spark isn’t to your liking, Nvidia has made the GB10 platform available to its system partners with a bit of wiggle room for customization. Dell, Acer, Asus, Gigabyte, HP, Lenovo, and MSI have all created GB10 boxes of their own with small variations in power, cooling, storage, cosmetics, and remote management options. Those options are likely of most interest to corporate and institutional IT departments that already have preferred vendors and support contracts.

Nvidia makes it easy to integrate the Spark into your existing workflow in a number of ways. The preinstalled DGX OS is a lightly Nvidia-flavored version of Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. You can use it as a regular PC with keyboard, mouse, and monitor connected, or you can set it up headless and use the free Nvidia Sync app to SSH into the system from your Windows PC or Mac. Using tools like Tailscale, you can conceivably connect to your Spark from anywhere in the world.

The included Nvidia Sync utility for Windows and macOS is handy, and it’s easy to set up. For just one example, I was able to leave ComfyUI running on the Spark and created a custom port forwarding rule that let me turn any PC in my house into a generative AI workstation with a single click. You can also set up Ollama for a private web chat interface or Cursor for AI-assisted coding in the same way.

MORE: Best Graphics Cards

MORE: GPU Benchmarks and Hierarchy

MORE: All Graphics Content

Let's take a look at the layout of the GB10 SoC before diving into its performance. Here's the logical topology of the chip, visualized with the lstopo utility:

Despite its branding, the Grace CPU on GB10 isn’t exactly like its data center counterparts. The Mediatek-designed CPU complex has 10 high-performance Arm Cortex-X925 cores and another 10 area-efficient Cortex-A725 cores. These are all off-the-shelf Arm designs, not Neoverse cores like you’ll find in an actual GB200 server.

Those 20 cores are spread across two clusters of 10, further subdivided into groups of five A725s and five X925s. Each X925 core has 2MB of L2 cache, and each A725 has 512KB. One cluster has 16MB of shared L3 cache, while the other has 8MB.

Meanwhile, the GB10 GPU has 6144 Blackwell CUDA cores, so it looks like the desktop RTX 5070 if you squint. But the similarities pretty much end there. Unlike the 672 GB/s of exclusive bandwidth afforded by the RTX 5070’s 12GB of GDDR7, the DGX Spark’s 128GB of LPDDR5X offers just 273 GB/s of raw memory bandwidth to the entire SoC.

The GB10 GPU also has much less L2 cache than the desktop RTX 5070, at 24 MB vs 48 MB for the desktop card, but that reduction is potentially balanced out by a 16MB L4 or side cache on GB10 that is meant to smooth out memory accesses across the chip.

Thanks to that relatively modest memory bandwidth figure, this system isn’t going to set any records for tokens generated per second on an LLM, but the world of AI applications thus far isn’t just about straight-line chatbot throughput.

At the frontiers of local AI, just being able to fit a model or group of models into VRAM is the difference between exploring their capabilities and getting nowhere at all. And content creation workflows like image and video generation are much more compute-intensive than they are bandwidth-hungry.

You’ll often hear Nvidia tout a 1 PFLOP raw compute figure for GB10, but as explained by the Blackwell architectural whitepaper, that claim only holds with NVFP4 workloads that can exploit sparsity, which is a pretty narrow use case. Take sparsity out of the picture, and peak NVFP4 compute is cut in half, to about 500 TFLOPS. As floating-point and tensor accumulate precision goes up from there, theoretical performance only goes down. Suffice it to say that the 1 PFLOP figure is mostly marketing.

All told, if we look at compute, memory bandwidth, and memory capacity as a triangle, the DGX Spark compromises on memory bandwidth while delivering enough computing power and memory capacity to serve as a jack-of-all-trades AI development sandbox.

All this goes to emphasize that this SoC is targeted at AI workloads first and foremost. You can game on it with the right Linux tools, but that’s not its primary objective. Let's see how it performs for some common local AI workflows.

MORE: Best Graphics Cards

MORE: GPU Benchmarks and Hierarchy

MORE: All Graphics Content

Gauging AI performance, especially for LLMs, is a broad discipline with a dizzying number of permutations thanks to the vast range of models, model runners, and possible workloads available.

We can’t possibly cover every one of those permutations in this article, but after much research and experimentation, we are at least confident that we’re able to provide some useful perspective on what the Spark can do.

For comparison purposes, we've benchmarked both the DGX Spark and a Ryzen AI Max+ 395 platform in the form of Corsair's AI Workstation 300 mini-PC.

We’ll start with LLM inference performance, since that’s where most enthusiasts dipping their toes into local AI are focused nowadays. We chose llama.cpp as our inference platform since it’s broadly compatible across platforms and offers a well-documented and tunable benchmarking interface.

Other model runners, like vLLM, SGLang, and Nvidia’s own Triton inference server, have their own pros and cons and their own performance characteristics, but we’re not benchmarking them against each other today.

We bench two phases of LLM interaction: prompt processing or prefill for input, and token generation for output.

We’ll start off our benchmarks using Meta’s llama-3.1-8B, a dense LLM (i.e., one for which all parameters are activated per token) whose behavior is well-understood in the current AI landscape.

We extended our dense model testing using Google’s Gemma 3 12B and 27B.

We’ll also look at performance with OpenAI’s gpt-oss 120b and Qwen3-30B-A3B models, which use mixture-of-experts (MoE) architectures that are closer to the state of the art in LLM research.

MoE models can have massive parameter counts, but only a portion of those parameters are activated for any given token. That allows MoEs to balance both capability and performance, although they can still require large amounts of memory. GPT-OSS 120b, for example, requires about 60 GB of RAM.

Speaking generally, the Spark’s higher raw compute horsepower makes it much faster for prompt processing than Strix Halo, meaning that your time to first token will generally be lower on the Spark, especially as context lengths grow. (For reference, a context length of 32,768 tokens is about 25,000 words.)

Once the tokens start rolling, the Spark is generally faster at churning them out than Strix Halo, too—especially at long context lengths.

The closest results between the platforms come from the dense Gemma 3 27B model, where both GB10 and Strix Halo seem to struggle with the sheer number of active parameters per token. But on every other test, the Spark holds the lead, and at every context depth.

LLMs are just one usage for AI compute, of course. Nvidia also positions the Spark as a companion accelerator for creative users who primarily work on laptops or Macs but need to offload tasks like image generation to a more powerful or versatile GPU without upgrading their entire system or migrating to an unfamiliar platform.

We tested the latest Flux.2 Klein 9B image generation workflow in ComfyUI using the same random seed as a base. After the first load for the workflow, the Spark generated iterations on our desired image in just over 60 seconds, while the Strix Halo platform took a whopping four times as long.

If iteration on generative imagery matters to you, the Spark can do the job with practically any image model thanks to its generous VRAM pool. Discrete GPUs can be much faster still, but you have to match the amount of available VRAM to your workload. And have you tried to buy anything more powerful than an RTX 5070 recently?

The brand-new LTX-2 video generation model also worked flawlessly on the Spark via ComfyUI as soon as I was able to load it up. After the first load, I was able to generate iterations on short 720p videos locally in just over three minutes.

Even with the latest ROCm 7.1.1 stack, however, trying to run the same LTX-2 workflow on our Strix Halo system resulted in HIP errors that would hang ComfyUI or crash the entire GNOME desktop environment.

That experience emphasizes a major advantage of the Spark as of this writing: stuff just works. If you need to try a particular workflow, you can generally rest assured that the Spark will run it on day one.

AMD has repeatedly and publicly committed to making ROCm a better AI platform from the desktop to the data center, but that improvement will take time, and the company clearly has its work cut out for it in this department.

MORE: Best Graphics Cards

MORE: GPU Benchmarks and Hierarchy

MORE: All Graphics Content

The Spark comes with a hefty 240 W USB-C power supply. Nvidia officially budgets 140 W of this for the GB10 SoC itself and leaves the rest for the ConnectX 7 NIC and other peripheral devices when they’re active.

The Spark idles at about 35 W as a headless system, and at about 40 W with a 4K 160Hz panel connected. This strikes us as a bit high given GB10’s Arm DNA and Nvidia’s mobile power management chops, but given that the typical enthusiast desktop pulls 75 W to 100 W at idle nowadays, it’s downright frugal by comparison.

We saw typical power usage of about 160 W at the wall under a primarily GPU-driven load, which suggests that overall system performance will be reduced somewhat if the CPU, GPU, and ConnectX NIC are all under heavy load at the same time.

In any case, instantaneous power draw isn’t useful for understanding efficiency by itself. Fast chips with high power draw can get a job done quickly, resulting in low overall task energy, while slow chips can consume lots of power over time to get the job done slowly.

To test token generation efficiency, we once again turned to llama.cpp. This time, we set up the test to generate 4096 output tokens from GPT-OSS 120b and logged cumulative power usage from both systems over the course of the benchmark. That lets us calculate the number of joules consumed to produce each token.

With an empty context buffer, both platforms expend about as much power to generate 4096 tokens from GPT-OSS 20B using llama.cpp. The Spark holds a small advantage here, but it’s not significant.

At the extremes of the context sizes we tested, however, Strix Halo takes twice as much time to generate the same amount of output, and so it expends twice as many joules per token as the Spark does to finish the job.

Our Strix Halo system only consumes about 112 W under an LLM inference load, so neither it nor the Spark are going to inflate your power bill or trip breakers when you put them to work. But we think it’s important to challenge the widely held notion that Strix Halo and GB10 are essentially “the same” when the reality is that GB10 is a faster and more efficient platform once you test anything that isn’t zero-context-depth LLM token generation.

The Spark remains quiet while delivering its solid performance. Under an extended image generation load, the loudest noise level we could measure from the Spark was 37.5 dBA at 18” from the system. (For reference, our testing environment has a noise floor of 33 dBA.)

The Spark isn’t silent under load, but it has a relatively neutral noise signature with only a hint of the high-pitched whine typical of small axial fans. It won’t disturb you or others around you when it’s hard at work.

The outer shell of the Spark does get quite hot under stress. A large amount of the heat is concentrated in the rightmost corner of the case, which appears to be the home of a big inductor in the power-delivery subsystem.

That corner of the Spark does get too hot to comfortably touch under load, but since this is a desktop system, it’s not likely that you should need to touch it under full load anyway.

We want to know whether the GB10 SoC itself is adequately cooled, of course. We don’t have the same wealth of system monitoring options on Linux that we do on Windows, but a glance at the nvtop utility suggests the GB10 GPU doesn’t exceed 82 °C under sustained load.

That’s quite a bit higher than the relatively chilly temps we usually see with quad-slot graphics cards that occupy more volume than the Spark itself, but for a compact system of this class, it’s well within acceptable limits.

nvtop also shows typical GPU clock speeds of about 2450 MHz, or about 10% lower than the RTX 5070 Founders Edition desktop card can sustain. All in all, for the types of workloads this system is built for, its achieved performance, thermals, noise levels, and efficiency are commendable.

MORE: Best Graphics Cards

MORE: GPU Benchmarks and Hierarchy

MORE: All Graphics Content

Nvidia’s DGX Spark is a bit tough to judge at first. It isn’t meant to replace your existing PC or Mac, although it certainly could if you’re a Linux native. It's not built to be a gaming system, although it can certainly do it as a party trick.

Instead, the Spark is best understood as an AI development toolbox, a Swiss Army knife for developers, institutions, and curious local AI enthusiasts who want a stable, dependable platform to build and explore with.

The Spark’s 128GB of RAM and the solid performance afforded by its Blackwell GPU across a wide range of workloads mean that you can work without getting stopped cold by resource limitations most of the time, and for a jack-of-all-trades development sandbox, that’s mission accomplished.

Beyond the hardware, time is money in a field that’s moving this fast, and Nvidia’s thorough documentation and software support are incredibly valuable if you want to get local AI workloads up and running without spending hours digging through Reddit threads or GitHub pages to figure stuff out.

The Spark feels like a fully turn-key, professional-grade platform, and businesses and institutions that are trying to get their heads around what AI applications can do for their employees or students with minimal fuss should take notice.

The Spark is also interesting purely as a milestone in personal computing. It’s the first “real” PC built entirely under Nvidia’s direction. Here’s a fast, efficient SoC on a cutting-edge 3nm process, boasting a 20-core Arm CPU paired with a powerful Blackwell GPU using the NVLink C2C interconnect, and it all just works. There’s not a drop of AMD or Intel tech in this platform, and maybe that should keep some folks up at night.

The $4,000 price tag of the Founders Edition Spark we tested might seem high on its face, but given its performance and versatility, it’s plenty competitive with other products in the market right now.

If you just want a powerful local token generator with lots of RAM for the biggest models, the comparison for the DGX Spark is probably a system like Apple’s Mac Studio.

The Studio’s much higher memory bandwidth (546 GB/s vs the Spark's 273 GB/s) should result in higher tokens-per-second throughput from LLMs if that’s your sole point of interest.

You can configure an M4 Max-powered Studio with comparable amounts of RAM and storage, along with a 40-core GPU, for about $700 more than the Spark as of this writing. But the Mac Studio doesn't support CUDA, and that will be a deal-breaker for some.

AMD’s Ryzen AI Max+ 395, aka Strix Halo, platform might look comparable to the DGX Spark on paper thanks to its powerful Radeon 8060S GPU and RAM pools ranging up to 128GB. Its x86 CPU makes it great for Windows gaming in addition to AI and Linux tasks. It’s developed a reputation as the local AI enthusiast’s scrappy platform of choice.

In our experience, though, AMD’s ROCm framework still isn’t as mature or stable as CUDA despite recent improvements (at least under Linux), and the Radeon 8060S has about half the raw GPU horsepower as the Spark. Our testing revealed that its performance at long LLM context lengths and for generative workflows falls well short of GB10’s.

If you need to tinker with large AI models or agentic workflows for the lowest possible cost, Strix Halo used to be a relatively inexpensive way of getting into the game, but prices for these systems have risen sharply amid the current AI crunch. You can still configure a wide range of Ryzen AI Max+ 395 boxes with 128GB of RAM and 4TB of storage for about $3,000 from vendors like Corsair, Framework, Minisforum , and GMKtec as of this writing.

But Asus’ Ascent GX10 version of the Nvidia GB10 platform also sells for as little as $3,000 with a 1TB SSD right now, and after our testing, we’d take the Ascent GX10 any day for a general-purpose local AI system. You can drop your own 4TB M.2 2230 SSD into the GX10 and keep about $700 in your pocket versus the Founders Edition Spark we tested.

AMD is going all in on Strix Halo for local AI this year, even going so far as to create its own Ryzen AI Halo mini-PC design that’s essentially a carbon copy of the DGX Spark. But hardware is only one part of the package, and from our experience, the Spark delivers the whole enchilada right now.

As local AI workflows continue to evolve rapidly, we think the DGX Spark (and the GB10 ecosystem more broadly) is the platform you’ll want to fully explore everything that’s possible from the whirlwind of new models and applications that will surely come down the pipe as we get further into 2026.

MORE: Best Graphics Cards

MORE: GPU Benchmarks and Hierarchy

MORE: All Graphics Content

A Chinese device maker is teasing a new mini PC inside a chassis that bears more than a passing resemblance to the Nintendo Entertainment System (NES). Acemagic’s blog and social media share images and a handful of specs for this AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 machine, which it has dubbed the Retro X5. The maker characterizes this mini PC as “an all-in-one solution created to simplify classic gaming,” which makes us wonder if it will come with Batocera Linux, SteamOS, or another non-Windows OS/UI.

We don’t know a lot about the hardware inside the Acemagic Retro X5 as yet. The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 inside is a capable processor, though. It features a 4x Zen 5 performance cores and 8x Zen 5c efficiency cores for a total of 12 cores and 24 threads, running at up to 5.1GHz. Onboard is a decent iGPU in the shape of the Radeon 890M (RDNA 3+). This packs in 16 CUs and runs at up to 2.9 GHz. There’s an XDNA 2 NPU with 50 TOPS, too.

If we are thinking about PC gaming with this processor, it should easily overshadow the Steam Deck. However, you will be targeting higher resolutions on a desktop. Also, as a mini PC, the HX 370 should run without the thermal constraints typically experienced in handheld or laptop designs. Thus, the Retro X5 might push this processor to the upper part of the processor’s configurable 15-54W TDP range.

From the few images of the new mini PC we can see a USB-C, 2x Type-A, a 3.5mm audio jack, and a power button up front. We also know that the “Retro X5 supports expandable memory and storage, multiple display outputs, and high-speed connectivity,” as it says so on the blog. Hopefully, that means at least: twin SODIMM slots, twin M.2 SSD slots, HDMI, USB-C monitor connectivity, USB4 or USB5, OCuLink, and Ethernet, multiple extra ports along the back, and built-in Wi-Fi / BT.

RetroPlay Box

It looks like Acemagic will try and differentiate its latest mini PC with some kind of launcher, dubbed RetroPlay Box, which you can see represented by swirling tiles in the Tweet embedded above. It could be an app that is pre-installed on Windows 11 – the least adventurous option.

There’s also the chance that Acemagic might go with a Linux-based OS to host its RetroPlay Box. It may save money on a Windows license by choosing SteamOS or Batocera Linux, for example. We shall have to wait and see.

Surfing the retro-wave

Acemagic is riding on the coattails of Ayaneo (and Nintendo) with its “inspired by iconic gaming consoles” design here. But, perhaps its timing, surfing the wave of retro-enthusiasm precipitated by Windows 11 disillusion, the rise of SteamOS, and yet another PC AAA gaming hardware cost crunch, will help it achieve better success.

The Acemagic Retro X5 is “coming soon,” according to the firm’s social media postings.

China-based Mini PC manufacturer Minisforum has just globally launched the MS-R1, the company's first foray into the ARM market, with a compact yet powerful device. Building on the interest in Nvidia's DGX Spark, the ongoing AI boom has made desktop-class ARM systems a hot topic, and Minisforum's MS-R1 differentiates itself by including support for dedicated GPUs and a UEFI.

The MS-R1 is based on Cixin's P1 SoC, using a rebranded variant of it called the CD8180. It's a 12-core SoC, packing 8x Cortex-A720 and 4x Cortex‑A520 cores, alongside an Immortalis-G720 MC10 integrated GPU. It features up to 64 GB of error-correcting LPPDR5 RAM, running at 5500 MT/s. Minisforum is quoting up to 45 TOPS of AI compute, with 28.8 coming from the NPU.

All that power doesn't require a lot of space, as the MS-R1 is only 1.7-liters in size and should run quietly thanks to its 28W max TDP. The 12-core SoC can boost up to 2.6 GHz, but looks to be fairlyweak, even compared to a last-gen Snapdragon X Elite. For connectivity, you get Bluetooth 5.3 and Wi-Fi 6E, plus the IO is packed, with a bunch of fast USB ports, dual 10Gbps Ethernet, and HDMI out.

Despite touting UEFI boot support — which should enable even beginners to run mainstream operating systems like Linux easily — Minisforum does not mention Windows on ARM, so we assume it's not supported. The company says this is a "major breakthrough" for ARM computing, allowing both complex setups and everyday environments to be booted into with just a USB drive.

Again, the MS-R1 has a dedicated PCIe x16 slot for discrete GPUs, making it one of the first and only compact ARM-based solutions to have that capability. Discrete GPUs can massively accelerate AI inference and training, and pair nicely with the ARM cores to offer an efficient yet powerful computer for AI, for much less than a DGX Spark.

Speaking of, Minisforum is asking $503 for the base unit with 32 GB RAM, which does not include any storage. The top-end model with 64 GB RAM and a 1 TB SSD is $695.90, and you do get an expandable (up to 8 TB) M.2 slot. It looks like the NAND and DRAM shortage has already hit Minisforum as well. These are early-bird discounted prices that will go up after the initial batch sells out (which it already has) showing just how much in demand desktop-class ARM is at the moment.

Orico, a Chinese tech company specializing in storage solutions, has entered the mini PC market with its Omini line of desktop PCs. According to IT Home [Machine Translated], the company is launching two new models — the Omini Plus and the Omini Pro. The former closely resembles the Mac Mini, while the latter looks like a shrunken Mac Pro, but AMD Ryzen chips power both.

The Pro mini PC uses high-grade aluminum for its PC case and features a “cheese grater” design on the front for optimal airflow. On the other hand, the Plus model has a design similar to the Mac mini, with its components accessible via its removable foot. However, it also has a vent in the back above its ports, reminiscent of the larger Mac Studio.

The Omini Plus is available in a single configuration, powered by an AMD Ryzen 5 7535H (now renamed the Ryzen 5 150) paired with 16GB DDR5 memory and a 2TB SSD. It also features a plethora of ports, including two USB4 Type-C ports, two USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A ports, two USB 2.0 Type-A ports, two 2.5G Ethernet ports, one DisplayPort 1.4, one HDMI 2.1 port, and a 3.5mm jack. All this is supported by dual heat pipes and a large fan to keep everything cool, especially as its volume is only about 0.8L. This mini PC is priced at RMB 3,799 (around $535) at the current exchange rate, though it’s available for pre-order at RMB 3,399 ($478).

We also have the Omini Pro, which comes with more options. It starts with an AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS processor with an integrated AMD Radeon 780M GPU. Although you can get this as a barebones unit, meaning you’ll have to supply your own memory and storage, it can also be had with a 32GB DDR5 SODIMM kit (upgradable up to 256GB) and a choice between a 1TB and a 2TB SSD. It also comes with two storage slots, with a total capacity of up to 8TB. Aside from the more powerful hardware, you get the same number of ports as above, which is already plentiful. The Omini Pro starts at RMB 3,099 (~$435) for the barebones version, although it’s on pre-order for just RMB 2,699 (around $380).

These devices aren’t designed for gamers specifically, but you can do some casual gaming on the side. Nevertheless, they’re largely good enough for most productivity applications, with the Omini Pro capable of onboard AI processing thanks to its built-in NPU. So, if you want a stylish mini PC that evokes Apple’s aesthetics but works with Windows 11 or Linux, these are great options to check out, provided they become available in your location.

Nvidia's DGX Spark AI mini-PC got its first star turn at CES this year and was penciled in for a May launch date at the show, but the platform has since experienced delays on its road to market. Whatever wrinkles were preventing a launch have apparently been ironed out. Nvidia has announced that DGX Spark systems will be available to buy starting October 15, both from Nvidia itself and from partners including Dell, Asus, MSI, and HP.

As a refresher, the DGX Spark is a Grace Blackwell GB10-powered mini-PC platform that's custom-tailored to the needs of local AI inference and development. Running inference on many of today's state-of-the-art AI models requires far, far more GPU-local memory than even the 32GB that an RTX 5090 can provide. (The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell offers up to 96GB of GPU-local memory, but that's an $8000+ product before you add in the cost of a host server or workstation).

The DGX Spark (formerly known as Project DIGITS) includes a unified, coherent pool of 128GB of LPDDR5X memory that's shared between a 20-Arm-core Nvidia Grace CPU and a Blackwell GPU that purports to deliver up to 1 petaFLOP of AI inferencing performance (assuming a model has been reduced to FP4 quantization with sparsity).

The company says a single DGX Spark supports up to 200-billion-parameter models locally (again assuming FP4 quantization). If one Spark isn't enough, two of these units can be connected using the built-in Nvidia ConnectX 7 NIC to double up on memory and compute resources.

The DGX Spark runs Nvidia's own DGX OS (a fork of Ubuntu) and supports the all-important CUDA software stack for AI developers. Unlike Strix Halo, which has found a niche as a (costly) gaming chip in devices as diverse as handhelds, the DGX Spark's Arm- and Linux-first nature makes it less appealing as a turn-key gaming platform, though curious enthusiasts can probably get their gaming fix on it with some work.

Until now, mini-PCs and laptops built around AMD's Ryzen AI Max+ 395 SoC (aka Strix Halo) have had the market of "relatively reasonably priced chip with a massive memory pool and enough compute for reasonable inferencing performance" all to themselves. Strix Halo supports up to 112GB of GPU memory (out of a possible 128GB of onboard RAM). But those systems don't natively support the widespread CUDA stack, making for some hurdles for developers and enthusiasts who want to get their AI projects up and running.

For its part, Nvidia says it's been working with a wide range of software partners to ensure that their tools work well with DGX Spark, including Anaconda, Cadence, ComfyUI, Docker, Google, Hugging Face, JetBrains, LM Studio, Meta, Microsoft, Ollama, and Roboflow, so it seems likely that if you have an LLM you want to run locally, a DGX Spark should be a solid foundation.

Nvidia originally said DGX Spark systems would start at $3,000 back in January, but at least the first-party DGX Spark will now retail for $3,999. Even at that price, its tiny size, relatively modest 240W power envelope, and complete turn-key support for the CUDA stack are likely to win it a lot of fans in the burgeoning AI space. We’ll have to see whether its long time in the oven has been a liability in a market where everything can still change in the space of hours or days.

Tech enthusiasts typically adore miniaturization, but companies have always found it tricky to make compact PCs that retain the most important aspects of a traditional desktop. An interesting new approach to this conundrum that caused a blip on our radar is the Wee Beastie Super Mini Fishtank PC on Kickstarter.

In essence, this pleasingly compact (4.75-liter) PC comes with a desktop RTX 4070 GPU installed, but it is supported by choice mobile components such as (up to) a Core Ultra 7 255H, 2x SODIMM RAM sticks, and a 1TB M.2 2230 NVMe SSD. There isn’t a big wall wart PSU outside the case, either; this design has a 400W unit in the chassis.

We aren’t saying that the Wee Beastie Super Mini Fishtank PC is the first PC maker to take this approach of cherry-picking between desktop and mobile parts for a sweet spot compact PC build, but it might get a lot of choices right. Check the specs, and see if it is right for you:

Stand out specs, beyond the processing power and size of this device, are the number of video outs and having the latest Wi-Fi 7 on board. It is also great to have a USB4 port for fast external storage and dock solutions.

Read our extensive review of the RTX 4070 to get some insight into what this desktop graphics card can achieve. However, we must point out that, according to the project FAQ, this graphics card isn’t interchangeable with any other you might grab from a retailer.

It is not a standard desktop graphics card inside

Though it looks like there may be a standard graphics card in the fish tank, in the FAQ, the makers clarify, “The Wee Beastie doesn't have the full sized 4070 graphics card that you would normally buy from the store and install into your full sized PC. It actually has the 4070 GPU processing chip that’s mounted on the circuit board along with all the other components needed to make it work. You would not be able to remove the 4070 from the Wee Beastie and plug and play it in another computer.” We think it uses an RTX 4070 desktop GPU on an MXM card.

Hopefully, the partnered 13700H (14C/20T, up to 5.0 GHz) or Ultra 7 255H (16C/16T and up to 5.1 GHz) won’t dampen the desktop GPU’s vigor.

One of the best things about a pre-built like this is the neatness, integration, and off-the-peg action readiness. According to its makers, the Wee Beastie Super Mini Fishtank PC is also “whisper quiet under load and prevents thermal throttling,” which directly addresses a lot of typical Mini PC concerns. According to the specs, there are “13 high performance fans” in this system, so decent air circulation should be taken for granted, if not its quietness.

Some will also find the Wee Beastie Super Mini Fishtank PC to be quite handsome. Videos and images shared by the device maker show the build is clean and clutter-free. The RGB lighting looks cool, too. Some images even show the fish tank case being used to show off some figurines (inside).

At Qualcomm's Snapdragon Summit, the company unveiled its Snapdragon X2 Elite processors for PCs. They serve as the follow-up to last year's X Elite series, which served as a kickstart for Windows on Arm and made an attempt to rival Apple's M-series. Qualcomm's reference designs on display at the summit included laptops, tablets, and some fascinating mini PCs, including a circular puck and a small square that docks into a monitor.

Pictured above is a reference design mini PC built around the Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme, an 18-core powerhouse capable of boosting up to 5 GHz (across two cores) with support for 228 GB/s of memory bandwidth. It's a tier above even the X2 Elite, which begs the question: how is it so thin? We know that some of Qualcomm's concepts were cooled by Frore AirJets, so it's possible solid state cooling played a role.

The completely circular design is unlike anything we've seen before — it's like if someone took a trash-can Mac Pro and squashed it down to look like a coaster. It even appears like a modern Apple computer from the bottom, and has suitably similar I/O in the form of two USB-C ports, a headphone jack, and a barrel jack connection for power. The device also seems to be milled from aluminum, with a Snapdragon red finish.

Qualcomm also showed a square unit compressed down to be almost as thin as a USB-C port. This one's a bit different because it's intentionally squared to fit in as part of a modular all-in-one system. The mini PC slides into a base, connected to a large monitor, which it subsequently powers.

It feels like an upgrade to all-in-one computers that have existed for decades, but this one looks like you could swap out the computing parts.

Speaking of which, the company did tell PC Mag that it's working with at least three OEMs in Taiwan. That means it's possible there might be some interest in adapting these reference designs down the line.

Mini-PC and eGPU maker Aoostar has added yet another eGPU dock to its arsenal of products. On Reddit, the company announced the EG01, a Thunderbolt 5 graphics card dock that supports full-size desktop graphics cards, ATX/SFX power supplies, and features an optional mini-PC holder on top. Pricing and a release date have yet to be disclosed.

Not much information has been publicly revealed about the dock; however, Notebookcheck was able to get some in-depth information about the EG01. But the outlet was able to find that the dock allegedly takes advantage of a Thunderbolt 5 interface and is compatible with OCuLink, making it one of the first docks to feature both connectivity standards. Thunderbolt 5 and OCuLink provide a PCIe 4.0 x4 interface from the host system to the graphics card, offering the best connectivity you'll see on eGPU docks right now.

Edge computing specialist Aaeon has rolled out the tiny new PICO-MTU4-SEMI, which it claims to be the “world’s smallest Intel Core Ultra-powered Mini PC.” This Intel Core Ultra 5 Processor 125U-packing PC measures just 108 x 95 x 43mm (about 0.44 liters, 14.9 fl oz). Searching our archives for smaller Core Ultra PCs seems to support the compactness claims, with the Aaeon being noticeably smaller than the MSI Cubi NUC 1M that we previously featured, for example.

The Aaeon PICO-MTU4-SEMI design gets bonus points for being entirely passive; however, it must lose some for looking like something you’d tether to the back of an Acorn Electron. Readers are also likely to be uneasy regarding the port selection. However, the limited internal expansion options seem like an understandable constraint here.

Knowing that this is a device targeting installation within “industrial robots and AGVs while still providing a broad selection of interfaces for peripheral devices such as cameras and sensors,” provides some background to the port selection. Thus, the PICO-MTU4-SEMI bristles with the familiar DB9 style ports, common on such devices. These are mostly intended for legacy-friendly COM ports, facilitating RS-232/422/485 serial communication with various industrial devices and machinery. We see on this new Aaeon that one is also a GPIO, for further I/O control flexibility. All these 9-pin ports are tagged as ‘optional’ in Aaeon’s spec sheets.

Sticking to the topic of ports, around the other side of the device, you will find a meager pair of USB 3.2 Type-A ports, 2.5GbE and 1GbE LAN ports, a single display output in the shape of an HDMI 1.4 connector, and a DC-in jack. That isn’t a lot, but one assumes Aaeon must know its business audience.

Tech channel SatisFactory Process has published a video revealing the careful and intricate business of manufacturing and preparing a mini PC for retail. Its 22-minute episode shows how a Beelink Mini PC begins with an almost amorphous blank of aluminum and ends with a compact yet tastefully formed device packing some of the newest chips and complementary technologies.

Beelink devices haven’t been reviewed on Tom’s Hardware previously, but we covered news of the release of some of their latest devices, like the SER9 mini-PC, powered by one of AMD's Ryzen AI 300 (Strix Point) processors. The firm has been going since 2011, and, judging by recent releases, it looks like it has found its niche in making cute aluminum mini PCs for the mass market.

From an amorphous aluminum blank

After a brief overview of Beelink operations and a glance at key stages of production, we are taken to the start of the production process – stamping the mini PC shell from an aluminum blank. They are roughly circular blanks, but when put in a press with a restraining jig, a ‘canteen’ shaped shell emerges. A secondary stamping machine refines this form to define cutouts and edges more precisely.

Next, we see the shell moved into a milling machine filled with gushing milky coolant. The spinning cutters in the machine add even more precise detailing to the shell. We don’t see it at the time, but we also believe cutouts for the front I/O ports are made at this time.

After further milling, we see one of the four sides of the shell removed for the rear I/O shield area. A factory worker now polishes all the surfaces of the shell. The milled form is then taken, in groups of 20 to 30 units, through an industrial dishwasher-style device – it looks hot.

Next up, the shell goes through a sandblaster for texture. Then we see it moved to a process for dipping, where it is anodized for color, with the quality of finish confirmed by a spectrophotometer reading. The Beelink logo is now laser-engraved on the top of the aluminum shell.

It is now time for the inner frame assembly, starting with a perfect-fit glued-in plastic sub-frame, which will accept screws and posts to fix components within.

Electronics prepared

The video now takes us to the area where the ‘computer’ is put into the ‘computer.’ We get a first glimpse of the motherboard PCB, which promptly goes into a machine to solder on an initial array of components at high speed.

Stopping for a photo at this point, we see that things like the DIMM slots, HDMI and USB ports, capacitors, and other surface mount chips are mainly in place. Trays of these partially finished motherboards are next sent along for manual I/O port installation, placed in jigs on a conveyor, and ultimately go through a wave soldering machine to fix all the hand-placed components in place.

It is now time for Beelink technicians to do a quick manual cleanup, implement any easy quick repairs, and add the CMOS battery to the board. Following various labeling activities and inductor impedance tests, we observed a technician involved in the MAC address setting. There follows a full interface functionality test, with lots of manual plugging and unplugging here. This will have been the first time all these components, brought together, have worked in unison.

After some further inspection and cleaning, the populated boards are data logged and bagged up. Cartons of these finished boards are then sent to the mini PC production assembly lines.

Mini PC assembly

The nimble fingers of the factory workers are required again, this time for placing and applying thermal pads and pastes. Of course, the CPU and system board cooler assembly gets fixed down next. A fan that almost completely covers the board is fixed on top of this assembly, which we think is a vapor chamber-style cooler.

After inspection of the manufactured assembly so far, we see the mating of the electronics and the aluminum shell that we saw prepared earlier. Extra panel I/O modules, out of line with the motherboard PCB, are now connected via ribbon cables.

It is time for all the user-replaceable and serviceable parts to be added now, with the Wi-Fi, RAM, and SSD slots all being populated. Naturally, it is time for another full system test to make sure no gremlins have squeezed into these systems.

Next, the bottom cover is secured before a physical check, where these mini PCs are shaken, bounced on tables, and so on. After passing the ‘physical,’ Beelink puts the machines through a burn-in and stability test stage.

Ready for retail, and this model is on sale right now

Lastly, there is a ‘pre-shipment re-test’ where the machines are powered up and required to pass a suite of hardware tests before packaging. Packaging is primarily done by hand, sometimes with the aid of a jig, and the mini PCs are at last in their final retail-ready boxes, cartoned off – ready to be sent to a warehouse or store near you.

Mini PC specialist Geekom has shared a video which shows its latest IT15 model being subjected to unnatural levels of violence. We are accustomed to seeing devices, particularly portable ones, being dropped, crushed, and splashed as part of standard endurance testing. However, this cute little machine, packing up to an Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 285H processor, endures torture like being spun in a washing machine, being hit by a sledgehammer, extremes of heat and cold, and the indignity of being dragged along the road by a motorbike. The PC survives intact, but with a few grazes, and we see it boot up at the end of the video.

Expand the tweet above to see the video. At the start of the video, the Geekom IT15 is inexplicably carried in a reinforced aluminum flight case, lulling it into a false sense of security, perhaps. Then the horror begins.

A 1.8-ton car runs over the little 0.46-liter NUC-style device at least twice. It is then hung up by a thread and walloped with a baseball bat. Geekom’s digital assassins were intent on whacking the IT15 some more, so they also sledgehammered it as it sat beneath two concrete blocks.

The punishment continued as the IT15 torturers decided to drag the little machine along a tarmac road, pulled by a motorbike at high speed. Just when you think it might end, seeing the device being carried carefully on top of a stack of books, it gets “dropped from height” down concrete steps. Someone in the Geekom team seemed to have then remembered that tests of devices enduring cold and heat were typical ruggedness assessment fare, so we saw the device chilled by sub-zero gases and then subjected to a blowtorch.

After such rough treatment, the IT15 might be due a clean, right? But throwing a mini PC in a washing machine for a “violent spin” probably isn’t advisable – so they did just that. It was a dry wash program, and not for too long, though.

At last, the pummelling of the Geekom IT15 does actually come to an end, and we get a close-up of all its battle scars. Your local used mobile phone emporium might refer to this as ‘Condition A minus.’ After taking it from the washer and plugging it into power and a monitor, the IT15 appears to have weathered all the abuse without affecting its computing ability. The probably inadvisable penultimate caption of the video proudly declares, “It just won’t break,” which some will see as a challenge.

Video shows “serious testing”

We reached out to Geekom regarding its extreme testing of the IT15 to ensure it was genuine. Our contact insisted that the video showed “serious testing,” and that a lot of the product's rugged nature is due to the ABS shell, which is “cushioned and, together with the sturdy internal metal frame, is particularly robust.” Actually, the firm’s official product pages include some durability claims, such as the device being able to “withstand 200kg of force without deformation,” and the all-metal frame and base adding to its strength.

Often, the most intriguing hardware modifications are also the strangest. CherryTree Inc., recognized for its unique custom PCs, has provided Gamers Nexus with the GeeFarce 5027 POS, a contender that could rival the best graphics cards available today, or not.

There are several options for disposing of a damaged graphics card. You could reuse it as a paperweight or doorstop, or simply throw it in the dumpster; however, that isn't the most responsible action, as it contributes to e-waste. Instead, CherryTree had the innovative idea of repurposing a graphics card into a fully functional system. The Gigabyte graphics card is a few generations old, as indicated by the cooler design, which was previously used with the manufacturer's GeForce RTX 20-series (codenamed Turing) graphics cards released approximately six years ago.

When the shroud was removed, it became apparent that CherryTree had integrated a NUC into the GeeFarce 5027 POS. Although not the most recent model, the Asus NUC 13 Pro still has decent specifications. It's equipped with the Core i7-1360P chip (codenamed Raptor Lake), which wields 12 cores and 16 threads with a boost clock speed up to 5 GHz on the P-cores. It also has integrated Iris Xe graphics, with 96 EUs up to 1.5 GHz. CherryTree paired the 28W Raptor Lake processor with 64GB of DDR4-3200 SO-DIMM memory and a 2TB MP33 PCIe 3.0 SSD, both sourced from TeamGroup.

I was browsing through the r/buildapcsales today, looking for something interesting, when I stumbled onto quite the deal. Amazon is selling a fully-functional desktop mini PC for just $44.99, and that's not even a limited-time sale. But just what do you get for your money?

The Wo-We Mini PC is powered by a dual-core, Intel Celeron N4020 CPU and sports 4GB of RAM, 128GB of eMMC storage, and Wi-Fi 5 wireless connectivity. It comes with Ubuntu Linux preinstalled, though we don't know which version.

In terms of video out, the PC has both a VGA and an HDMI port. It can support dual screens and a maximum resolution of 4K (on a single screen) via its Intel UHD Graphics 600 integrated GPU.

On its Amazon page, Wo-We claims that the Mini PC offers "powerful performance without breaking the bank" and that its Intel UHD 600 GPU offers "state-of-the-art" graphics technology. The company says that its 802.11ac Wi-Fi offers "faster, smoother and more stable Internet access" too.

The tiny, 5.12 x 6.61-inch black box has a USB-C 5 Gbps port, microSD and dual USB Type-A 5 Gbps ports on the front. The back has the VGA, HDMI, 1 Gbps Ethernet, and dual USB 2.0 ports.

Depending on your needs, the Wo-We is either "Whoa, we got a lot for the money" or "Woe betide we who bought this." If you just want to use web tools, are comfortable working in Ubuntu Linux (which isn't hard to learn), and don't do much multitasking, this could work out.

If you like to have many tabs open or you don't have a lot of patience, this could end up as a $44 paperweight. We haven't gotten the Wo-We Mini PC in for testing. However, we wouldn't expect great performance, considering that its 2019-era Celeron has two cores, two threads, 4MB of cache, a base clock of 1.1 GHz, and a boost clock of 2.8 GHz.

Those are some weak specs, as most desktop CPUs and even many mobile CPUs these days have boost clocks in the 4 to 5 GHz range. The good news is that the Celeron only has a 6W TDP, so it doesn't need active cooling. That keeps the Mini PC from making noise.

What probably hurts the experience more is the 4GB of RAM, which would make web browsing with more than a couple of tabs open a challenge. However, Linux usually makes better use of memory than Windows does.

Another problem: the eMMC memory is probably about equivalent in speed to a typical (not high-speed) microSD card. So boot time and the time you wait to open apps could be slow.

Tech-savvy users who know to expect lag may have the patience for slowness, but those who need this the most -- people who don't have computers already -- will likely be less inclined to tolerate it. If you're a low-information user, you may be confused by Linux and frustrated by any problems you run into. You could always get Windows and install it, though not Windows 11.

Of course, there are other low-cost choices that allow you to do basic computing. Right now, Woot has a Raspberry Pi 4B with 8GB of RAM for $44. However, during non-sale times, you're getting 2GB of RAM on your Pi at this price and 4GB will cost you quite a bit more. And with Raspberry Pi, you'd need to buy a microSD card to install your OS on, get micro HDMI cables for video and you couldn't run install Windows (like you can on the Wo-We).

Wo-We also sells a $54 Mini PC with 8GB of RAM but with an even older AMD Excavator A9-9400 CPU that launched in May 2016. That's a bit long in the tooth, even for a bargain.

It's interesting to see that you can get a workable, brand-new desktop PC for $44. However, the people most fascinated with this system (PC enthusiasts like me) probably need it the least.

Zotac is preparing to launch new mini-PC offerings at Computex next week, featuring AMD's beastly Strix Halo APUs and desktop Blackwell GPUs from Nvidia. So far, the company has showcased two designs with Nvidia hardware, featuring the desktop RTX 5060 Ti and the RTX 5070, and one AMD-based design with a Ryzen AI MAX CPU. Details on exact specifications and pricing have not been shared, but we'll hear more from the team at Taipei in just a few days.

Under its ZBOX Mini PC offerings, Zotac's Magnus-E lineup features compact yet powerful mini-PCs targeted at enthusiasts and content creators. The latest Strix Halo addition should extend their appeal to AI/ML developers as well. The upcoming Magnus One is equipped with an 8.48-liter chassis, housing a desktop RTX 5070 Ti 16GB along with a Core Ultra 7 processor from Intel, potentially from the Core Ultra 200S series.

The Magnus EN follows with a compact 2.65-liter design, home to the RTX 5060 Ti 16GB (desktop). This is accompanied by a mobile Core Ultra 7 processor, which can either be the Core Ultra 7 265H or its HX counterpart. With Arrow Lake, the distinction between Intel's H and HX grade processors goes beyond TDP and core counts. Arrow Lake-H features rebadged SoC Tiles from Meteor Lake, which can potentially offset performance gains, as shown in a previous review.

If you're in the market for a new computer, and you would like something that doesn't take up too much space, you may want to consider a mini PC. These are smaller than your average desktop, with an impressively tiny footprint. Today, we've got a deal to share on one of the biggest name brands out there. Apple has its own line of mini PCs known as the Mac Mini range. Right now at Amazon, you can find the 2024 Apple Mac Mini M4 desktop for its lowest price to date — it's currently listed at $499, a full $100 below its recommended price of $599.

This edition features Apple's M4 chip, not to be confused with the M4 Pro, which is a bit more powerful. We had the opportunity to review the Mac Mini M4 Pro last year and loved our experience. For a Mini PC this size, it has plenty to offer, making it a great option for someone that wants a machine oriented for work purposes rather than gaming. It's important to note, however, that we only reviewed the M4 Pro edition, so the performance will differ from the one that's on sale today.

The SoC powering the Apple Mac Mini is an M4 chip. This features a 10-core processor alongside a 10-core GPU. This mini PC lives up to its name with a form factor that measures in at 5 x 5in. Because it's created by Apple, it's easy to integrate the Mac Mini into a family with numerous iDevices. For example, you can access your iPhone from the Mac Mini using "iPhone Mirroring" which lets you not only see what's on your iPhone screen from the computer but also control and interact with it in real time.

To support the M4 chip, the system comes with 16GB of RAM, and there's a 256GB SSD for storage. It has quite an impressive selection of ports, as well, given its size. You get two USB Type-C ports, three Thunderbolt ports, and an HDMI output. For network support, you can take advantage of WiFi 6 wireless connections or use a hard wire with its Ethernet jack. As far as audio support goes, it has a built-in speaker alongside an optional 3.5mm audio jack for connecting external audio peripherals.

If you want to check out this deal, head over to the Apple 2024 M4 Mac Mini desktop product page at Amazon for more details.

Asus has lifted the curtains of the Ascent GX10, the company's rendition of Nvidia's Project Digits, at GTC 2025. Leveraging the chipmaker's GB10 Grace Blackwell Superchip, the Ascent GX10 offers up to 1,000 TOPS of AI performance.

Like Project Digits, the Ascent GX10 is a mini-PC that can be placed on your desk. You just need to connect a keyboard, mouse, and monitor to it to have a powerful AI supercomputer at your disposal. Asus hasn't liberated the product page for the Ascent GX10, so all the specifications we have on the mini-PC come from the press release.

The GB10, the heart of the Ascent GX10, combines Nvidia's Grace CPU and Blackwell GPU. However, the GB10 is a shrunk-down version of Nvidia's Grace Blackwell Superchip.

The Grace CPU features a 20-core Arm design comprising 10 Cortex-X925 and 10 Cortex-A725 cores. It is connected to Nvidia's latest Blackwell GPU through a high-performance NVLink-C2C interconnect. In unison, the GB10 delivers up to 1 PFLOP (1,000 TFLOPS) of FP4 performance.

Ascent GX10, Bringing AI Power To Developer's Fingertips

“AI is transforming every industry, and the ASUS Ascent GX10 is designed to bring this transformative power to every developer’s fingertips,” said KuoWei Chao, General Manager of ASUS IoT and NUC Business Group in the press release. “By integrating the NVIDIA Grace Blackwell Superchip, we are providing a powerful yet compact tool that enables developers, data scientists, and AI researchers to innovate and push the boundaries of AI right from their desks.”

The Ascent GX10 also has 128GB of unified system memory, which allows the device to handle AI models with up to 200 billion parameters. While Asus didn't reveal the memory's specifications, it should use the same LPDDR5x as Project Digits and up to 4TB of M.2 NVMe storage with self-encryption.

The device has Nvidia's ConnectX network interface as part of its networking capabilities, meaning you can hook up to Ascend GX10 systems for larger AI models, such as Llama 3.1, which flaunts up to 405 billion parameters.

Without a product page or additional renders, we can't know for sure what kind of connectivity the Ascend GX10 will offer. For reference, Project Digits has four USB4 Type-C ports, Wi-Fi, an Ethernet port, and one HDMI 2.1a port for the display.

Asus hasn't revealed the Ascent GX10's availability or pricing. Project Digits will hit the market in May, starting at $3,000, and we expect the AScent GX10 to have similar availability and pricing.

China's GMKTec has announced the EVO-X2, which it claims is "the world's first AI mini PC equipped with the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 processor." The device was shown off at the AMD Greater China Channel Summit today, with top red-team execs like CEO Lisa Su and SVP & GM Jack Huynh in attendance. GMKTec was lucky enough to get Dr. Su to sign one or more of the new EVO-X2 mini PCs, and the source blog hints there is a batch of Signature Editions.

Detailed hardware specs of the EVO-X2 are not readily available, and the product page has yet to be published by GMKTec, so you'll have to settle for a brief outline for now. As far as the internals go, all we are sure about is that this compact desktop will pack an AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 processor. However, its performance in DeepSeek R1 tests is more than 3X that of an RTX 5080 desktop GPU, according to purported GMKTec hardware demonstrations.

To recap the AMD Strix Halo APU's specs, it features a Zen 5 architecture CPU configured with 16 cores and 32 threads (two CCDs), operating at a maximum frequency of 5.1 GHz. As an APU, this is joined by a beefy iGPU, namely the RDNA 3.5 architecture Radeon 8060S with 40 compute units. Rounding off the processing package, there is an XDNA2 NPU which is capable of 50 TOPS. AMD has also shoved 80MB cache onboard, but buyers will have a choice of the RAM quota (up to 128GB of 256-bit LPDDR5X-8533 RAM) at time of purchase.

Back to pixel peeping to unearth more details about the GMKTec EVO-X2, and one of the first comments we can make is that it is pretty sizable for a mini PC. In the image featuring Jack Huynh, you can see the AMD SVP & GM holding a Geekom machine, which appears to be a traditional '4 x 4' NUC-a-like. With the EVO-X2 in close proximity, we Photoshop-estimate that the EVO-X2 is a '5 x 4.5' and larger in the remaining dimension.

Images shared by GMKTec on social media provide further ideas about the shape and form of the EVO-X2. Also, we can clearly see a power button to the front, alongside an SD card reader, a Thunderbolt (Type C) port, twin USB (Type A ports), and a headset jack. Around the back are three more USB (Type-A) ports, another Thunderbolt, HDMI, DP, an RJ45 network port, another headset jack, and a barrel power jack.

Enthusiasts are excited about the new generation Strix Halo APUs from AMD. So if GMKTec can get its product on shelves ahead of the likes of the HP Z2 Mini G1a and Framework Desktop - at an attractive price - it will have won a minor coup. We don't know how many 'Lisa Su' signed models there are, but the source blog hints there is a batch.

As for who will be first with an AMD Strix Halo, Asus originally slated its ROG Flow Z13 for release in February, but it still seems to be in pre-order purgatory, and it's not a mini PC. The Framework Desktop machines with Ryzen AI Max chips aren't expected until Q3 this year. The other machine we have heard about, the HP Z2 Mini G1a, is set to be released in 'spring.'

The new Mac Studio continues Apple's practice of placing its homegrown Arm-based chips into a workstation chassis far more compact than what we find in its PC counterparts. While you might not immediately be clued into just how powerful Apple's new Mac Studio is by looking at it, don't be fooled. While the previous generation Mac Studio with M2 Ultra was powerful, Apple has dialed up performance even more with this generation.

We don't often test pre-built workstations, but we couldn’t turn down the chance to review two configurations of the new Mac Studio: a lower-end system with the M4 Max and a higher-end configuration with what is currently Apple's most powerful processor, the M3 Ultra.

Apple is aiming the Mac Studio with M4 Max at creative professionals, particularly photographers, video editors, and engineers (among others). The M3 Ultra-equipped variant is equipped to handle more demanding tasks like LLMs and scientific research.

Design of the Mac Studio (2025)

Apple has not changed the design of this year's Mac Studio, which is a good thing. The chassis is 7.7 inches wide, 7.7 inches deep, and 3.7 inches tall. Our M4 Max review unit weighs 6.1 pounds, while our M3 Ultra unit weighs a more substantial 8.0 pounds due to its inclusion of a larger copper heatsink to keep thermals in check.

Although the two systems look identical from the front, some internal differences exist. The M4 Max system has two USB-C ports up front that support 10 GB/s speeds and an SDXC (UHS-II) card slot. The M3 Ultra also has an SDXC card slot, but its two USB-C ports support Thunderbolt 5 at speeds up to 120 Gb/s.

The port allotment on the back of the two systems is identical. You'll find four Thunderbolt 5 ports, two USB-A ports (5 Gb/s), an HDMI 2.1 port, 3.5 mm headphone jack, and a 10 Gb/s Ethernet port. The Mac Studio has Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3 for wireless connectivity. Even though Wi-Fi 7 is becoming more commonplace on high-end PC motherboards, laptops, and desktops, Apple hasn't yet made that shift with the Mac Studio.

Above the rear ports you'll find a large panel with exhaust holes for the internal fan. Cool air is drawn in from the bottom of the unit.

We’ve grown accustomed to Macs not allowing for hardware upgrades post-purchase (with the exception of the Mac Pro's storage). That remains the case with the Mac Studio. CPU, RAM, and storage configurations must be selected at the time of purchase. If you get your Mac Studio home and want to later add more memory, you’re out of luck. Technically, the internal SSD is removable, but Apple’s on-SoC encryption protocols make a DIY change difficult. Some third parties have developed SSD modules that reverse-engineer Apple’s efforts, but that’s a risky proposition for a workstation-grade system that starts at $1,999 and can creep into 5-digit territory with all the trimmings.

Mac Studio Specifications

M3 Ultra and M4 Max Performance on the Mac Studio

The M4 Max is a known quantity; This is the same chip that debuted with the most recent refresh of the 14- and 16-inch MacBook Pros. Our M4 Max review unit has a 16-core CPU (12 performance cores, 4 efficiency cores), 40-core GPU, 128GB of unified memory, and a 128GB SSD.

The M3 Ultra is the more interesting of the two chips, and not just because it isn’t called the M4 Ultra. Apple’s official response to the lack of an M4 Ultra is that not every generation of its M-Series chip will get an “Ultra” variant. So, that leaves us with the M3 Ultra, which joins together two M3 Max chips (they are joined using what Apple eloquently calls “UltraFusion”). The 184 billion-transistor chip inside our review unit has 32 cores (24 performance cores, 8 efficiency cores) and can be paired with up to 512GB of unified memory (256GB in our review unit) and delivers a maximum of 819 GB/s of memory bandwidth. Apple says that customers opting for the full 512GB allotment can run large language models (LLMs) that have up to 600 billion parameters completely within memory.

Given that our review unit also has a fully-enabled version of the M3 Ultra, it also incorporates 80 GPU cores, up from a maximum of 70 on the previous-generation M2 Ultra. It also has a 32-core neural processing unit (NPU) and a dedicated hardware media engine for H.256, HEVC, and ProRes encoding/decoding.

Joining our M3 Ultra and M4 Max review units in our testing are two PC-centric workstation chips: Intel’s Xeon W9-3495X and AMD’s Threadripper Pro 5995WX. We already had systems built around these processors in-house, so it seemed appropriate to compare them. The Xeon w9-3495X is a 56-core chip with a $5,889 MSRP. The Threadripper Pro 5995WX is a 64-core chip with a suggested retail price of $6,499. Those are before being built into systems, so it's a big difference from Apple, which makes entire PCs, not just chips.

We started our benchmarks with the Geekbench 6.4 CPU test. Here, the M3 Ultra delivered a single-core score of 3,349, putting it well ahead of the M2 Ultra (2,815) and beyond what’s possible with our AMD and Intel workstation systems. Apple’s decision to use two different generations of SoCs in the new Mac Studio shows the first quirk in our testing when it comes to the M4 Max. The M4 Max uses TSMC’s second-generation 3nm process node, along with a new, faster, and more powerful CPU architecture. The M3 Ultra, on the other hand, is using a first-generation 3nm TSMC node.

Geekbench reported that our M3 Ultra ran at 4.05 GHz, while the M4 Max ran at 4.5 GHz. As a result, the M4 Max put up a single-core score of 4,113. Multi-core performance was surprisingly close between the two, despite the M3 Ultra having double the cores. The M3 Ultra scored 27,929 on the multi-core benchmark, while the M4 Max wasn’t too far behind at 26,966.

Our file transfer test involves copying 25GB of mixed media files. The M3 Ultra finished the task, recording 2,685 MBps along the way, while the M4 Max hit 2,441 MBps, essentially tying the result of the last M2 Ultra Mac Studio that we tested.

The Mac Studio with M3 Ultra really stretched its legs in our Handbrake test, which involves transcoding a 4K video file to 1080p. The M3 Ultra completed the task in just one minute and 16 seconds compared to one minute and 56 seconds for the M4 Max. The Mac Studio with M2 Ultra finished in 2:45. The Xeon and Threadripper systems finished the transcode in roughly 2:40.

Moving on to the Xcode benchmark, which we use for simulating a large development project, the M3 Ultra finished in 64 seconds, which was an oddity compared to the M2 Ultra, which took just 58 seconds. The M4 Max completed the task in 79 seconds.

Using Cinebench 2024 we stress tested the M3 Ultra and M4 Max over ten runs in the multi-core benchmark. The M3 Ultra started the test just under 3,000, but remained consistently between 3,000 and 3,100 through the subsequent runs. The M4 Max, on the other hand, hovered between 2,050 and 2,100. We also use Cinebench 2024 to measure CPU temperatures, and TG Pro is our go-to macOS utility for measuring this data. TG Pro doesn’t fully support the M3 Ultra yet, but showed a system temperature of 43 degrees Celsius, while the M4 Max measured 42 degrees Celsius.

We use the Blender benchmark for testing performance applying visual effects and 3D modelling. We tested the CPU and GPU on the Mac Studio systems, while only the CPU was tested on the Xeon and Threadripper systems. While the M3 Ultra put up a valiant fight in Monster (339.9 samples per second), it was still no match for the core-packed Xeon (446.67) and Threadripper (485.33). The M4 Max was further behind at 240.52. It was a similar story in Junkshop, where the M3 Ultra and M4 Max recorded 243.2 and 153.9, respectively, compared to 302 and 350 for the Xeon and Threadripper. Finally, the Classroom test (173.3 for the M3 Ultra, 104.28 for the M4 Max) chalked up another win for the x86-64 stalwarts (212.33 for the Xeon, 230 for the Threadripper).

However, the M3 Ultra had the last laugh when switching to the GPU testing where it absolutely clobbered the competition. The M3 Ultra hit 3,246.45 samples per second in Monster, 1,581.17 in Junkshop and 1,643.26 in Classroom. The M4 Max also had a strong showing at 2,344.09, 1,271.57, and 1,234.93, respectively.

To test the gaming acumen of the new Mac Studios, I opted to try Resident Evil Village. I tested both systems with a 49-inch Philips Evnia 8000 DQHD 240 Hz QD-OLED gaming monitor. The game looked absolutely brilliant with all detail settings maxed out and with MetalFX upscaling turned on. I saw around 100 fps on the M3 Studio and around 80 fps on the M4 Max at 5120 x 1440.

My daily driver is a 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M3 Pro processor and 36GB of RAM. Either variant of the Mac Studio was overkill for my daily needs. I was never left wanting for more performance while gaming, editing photos in Pixelmator Pro (now an Apple app), or editing videos of my kids.

Software and Warranty on the Mac Studio

The new Mac Studio ships with macOS Sequoia 15.3.1, and required no additional OS or security updates out of the box (though by the time you get one, your mileage may vary). This is the latest version of the operating system that we first visited in our review of the 14-inch MacBook Pro in late 2024. Apple hasn’t given macOS a significant design overhaul in many years, and most of the updates to the operating system have been iterative and mostly fly under the radar.

The biggest addition to Sequoia is Apple Intelligence, which makes better use of context clues to find information in your treasure trove of digital data. Apple Intelligence also means that Siri is no longer dumber than a box of rocks when it comes to answering complex (and sometimes, rather basic) queries thanks to integration with ChatGPT. However, a fully rebuilt Siri is still way off in the distance for Mac users. Continuity updates mean that you can now mirror your iPhone on your macOS desktop using iPhone Mirroring, and you can drag and drop files and media between your Mac and iPhone. There are also quality of life improvements to Apple’s pack-in apps like Safari, Mail, and Messages.

There's no egregious bloat among the included software. Apple’s usual array of programs that are preinstalled include Safari, Maps, Notes, FaceTime, Mail, and Calendar. Apple also wants to lure you in on the recurring revenue train with its popular services like Apple Music and Apple TV. All of Apple’s apps, and a significant segment of third-party apps natively support Apple Silicon. After all, Apple first made the shift to its in-house chip designs in late 2020. For developers that haven’t yet gotten onboard the Apple Silicon train, Rosetta 2 serves as a translation layer between older apps designed for x86 software. When you first start an x86, Rosetta 2 automatically downloads from Apple to ensure that the app runs flawlessly.

All Mac Studios ship with a one-year warranty. If you’d like to add AppleCare+ coverage (Apple’s extended warranty), which in my opinion seems a little unnecessary for a desktop system, Apple charges $59.99/year.

Mac Studio Configurations

The base Mac Studio costs $1,999, which gets you an M4 Max processor with 14 CPU cores and a 32-core GPU. 36GB of unified memory comes standard, as is a 512GB SSD. Our M4 Max review unit was configured with the 16-core CPU/40-core GPU variant of the M4 Max, 128GB of unified memory, and a 1TB SSD, which retails for $3,699.

Our M3 Ultra review unit came with a 32-core CPU and 80-core GPU. Add in 256GB of unified memory and a 4TB SSD pushes the price to an eye-watering $8,099. If you have an itch for the M3 Ultra but want to save a few bucks, you can go with a smaller SSD, less memory, or opt for the 28-core CPU/60-core GPU version. The base M3 Ultra with the 28-core CPU/60-core GPU, 96GB of unified memory, and a 1TB SSD costs $3,999.

If you want to fully max out the M3 Ultra version of the Mac Studio, opting for 512GB of unified memory and a 16TB SSD brings the grand total to $14,099. You don’t get a mouse/trackpad or keyboard in the box, so be sure to source those as well if you’re speccing out a new system.

Bottom Line

The Mac Studio is a fascinating product. For less than the cost of just a Xeon or Threadripper workstation processor, you can get a fully-functioning macOS machine with some serious horsepower under the hood. The M3 Ultra dominated most of our CPU tests, except for the single-threaded Geekbench test that favored the M4 Max, and the Blender CPU tests which favored the Xeon and the Threadripper with their huge advantage in core counts.

The M3 Studio blew through our Handbrake transcode test in record time, aced our file transfer test, and held its own on the Blender CPU benchmark tests against the Intel and AMD competition. However, when we switched to the GPU in the Blender tests, the Mac Studio blew the doors off the competition, with the M4 Max trailing not too far behind.

The new Mac Studios achieves these feats silently, as even under full load, I could only hear the dual internal fans if my ear was up against the exhaust vent. But for all its plusses, the Mac Studio still has some downsides. There’s no way to upgrade your memory or SSD after purchase, so you’ll need to forecast what your needs will be a few years down the road regarding hardware resources. Also, memory and SSD upgrade prices are far pricier than what you find on the PC side.

But if you’re firmly in the Apple camp, or even a PC stalwart that doesn’t mind expanding his or her horizons to the macOS realm, the Mac Studio remains a compelling choice in a compact package.

Intel processors have always powered NUCs. However, things changed when Asus took over the NUC line from the chipmaker in 2023. The manufacturer is seemingly experimenting with AMD chips after customs filing discovered by ComputerBase (machine translated) showed an entry for a “Personal Computer mini-PC (NUC14LNS) Asus AMD Ryzen AI Max-395/W 8060S, 64 BIT”.

If this is true, this will be the first NUC to feature an AMD chip, and it will come soon after Asus launches a family of five NUCs powered by an Intel processor. It won’t be its first device to use a Ryzen AI Max+ (Strix Halo) CPU, though, as it’s rumored to power the upcoming ROG Flow Z13 laptop (also listed in the customs document).

AMD also claims that the Ryzen AI Max 395+’s integrated graphics, the Radeon 8060S, can beat the RTX 4070 laptop GPU by up to 68%—a massive claim by the company but is helped by the fact that it has 40 RDNA 3.5 graphics cores. If true, this will disadvantage Asus NUCs if it only sticks with Intel processors, especially as some smaller manufacturers like GMK have already hinted at releasing a mini-PC powered by this processor.

The mini-PC customs description says it’s “for BIS testing,” which likely means the Bureau of Indian Standards. If that’s the case, then Asus likely already built and tested the AMD-powered NUC within the company. Indian authorities are now testing it to ensure it conforms to local standards. This might also mean that this device is destined for launch in India, although there is no official word from Asus yet about whether this is the case or if it will have a global launch.

Given that Asus is investing in product certification, there’s a good chance this is a genuine product. The company is just holding off on its announcement until the authorities give it the green light. We also hope that it will make its way to our shores. That way, mini-PC fans will have more options, and we could enjoy the massive performance that its integrated GPU delivers.

A fan of Sony's classic handheld Windows slider PC designs is planning a drop-in upgrade. On Friday, Tomsek68 shared his plans on Reddit, proposing swapping out the decrepit internals of a Sony Vaio VGX-UX Micro PC (circa 2006) with a custom PCB and assembly based on an OrangePi CM5.

If the above-outlined project works out, the old Intel Core Solo-driven Windows XP device from Sony Vaio will be transformed into a modern octa-core processor packed with portable Linux. Moreover, Tomsek may be interested in crowdfunding these drop-in replacement boards if they see signs there are enough interested backers.

Tomsek68 says they have two Vaio VGN-UX devices that are too old to repair or revive. The Redditor has spent several weeks remodeling the internals of the Vaio, which comes out of the outer shell in one piece. Ultimately, the intention is to fine-tune 3D models to duplicate these innards and prepare a new PCB to become the new heart of the device.

Citing his PCB design skills, the Redditor seems confident of a successful project providing a drop-in replacement capable of revamping and revitalizing a Vaio VGN-UX UMPC. Instead of completing the project according to his needs, Tomsek68 generously asks other UMPC subreddit readers for opinions.

Tomsek68 knows that some aspects of the Vaio VGN-UX are well past their sell-by date, such as features like i.Link and the Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo slot. However, they are polling the community about desirable new features, acceptable price points, and the optimal SBC for powering these reanimated Sony UMPCs. Nothing larger than a CM4/CM5 will suit explains the Redditor.

Redditor and PCB design hobbyist Tomsek68 specifically asked about a drop-in replacement upgrade board for these UMPCs. In other words, don't distract them with requests for new screens, thumb boards, or other off-topic upgrades. As a reminder, the Sony Vaio VGN-UX devices launched with slide-out 4.5-inch 1,024 x 600-pixel XBrite TFT LCD touchscreens, a full QWERTY keyboard for thumbing, a fingerprint reader, plus cameras front and back.

Hopefully, enough people will be interested in these upgrade plans and subsequently respond to the Redditor's Google forms to get this project off the ground. Should the groundswell of interest be sufficient (>50 units), Tomsek68 seems likely to move to crowdfunding.

Mini PC maker GMK has been showing off its new EVO-X1 mini PC. It looks like a great little device with one of the latest 'Strix Point' processors from AMD, and plenty of fast ports. However, it also hints that this machine is earmarked for a powerful Ryzen AI Max+ 395 'Strix Halo' processor upgrade in the not-too-distant future.

GMK introduced the EVO-X1 last year — a mini-PC equipped with a Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 chip and Radeon 890M integrated graphics. This is one of the most powerful chips in the current AMD Strix Point lineup, with the CPU boasting 12 cores and 24 threads and the integrated GPU having 16 compute units. The company also gave the EVO-X1 a standard 32GB of memory and a choice between 1TB or 2TB of storage.

What also makes this small computer stand out from the crowd is that it’s the first Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 mini-PC that has an OCuLink port, allowing it to attach to a suitable external GPU without crippling its bandwidth too much. GMK doesn’t have an external GPU enclosure listed on its US website, though, so you’ll have to purchase them separately from other manufacturers, like the Aoostar AG01 or the Minisforum MGA1. But whatever the case, this OCuLink port would allow you to pair the excellent performance of the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 with a more powerful GPU, up to an RTX 4090 (we wouldn’t recommend that, though, as OCuLink could show an up to 23% drop in performance for high-end GPUs). Connecting with OCuLink should provide much better bandwidth than the Thunderbolt 3 or 4, or USB4 alternatives.

Aside from the OCuLink port (which, unfortunately, isn’t hot-swappable), the EVO-X1 also has two USB-A ports, a USB-C port, and a 3.5 mm combo jack up front, plus the power button right beside the jack. It’s unclear what other USB ports are available at the back, but we also have one HDMI 2.1 and one DisplayPort 2.1 for connecting your display to the onboard graphics. All these features are available for $1,299 for the 1 TB version (although it’s currently on sale at $919.99), while the 2 TB version is priced at $1,599 (with a sale price of $969.99).

Although these specifications are already impressive, GMK is going even further, saying in a press release on Chinese social media site BiliBili (machine translated) that the company “took the lead in launching the Ryzen AI Max+ 395.”

Although details are scant at the moment, the company shared a Geekbench result for the Vulkan test, which showed the processor, presumably on an EVO-X1 mini-PC evaluation platform, achieving 67,004 points. This score beats the RTX 3050 and RX 5700 desktop graphics cards, showing how far integrated GPUs have come along and the potential of AMD’s top-end Strix Halo chip for its mini-PC.

Still, you should note that reviewers rarely use Geekbench 6 to measure GPU performance and that we should wait for independent reviews to see what this mini-PC could do. Whatever the case, we want to see how the EVO-X1 mini-PC with a Ryzen AI Max+ 395 would stack up as a gaming and productivity machine, and if its built-in GPU could really lead to the end of entry-level graphics cards.

At CES 2025, Chinese PC manufacturer Emdoor (usually focused on rugged PC products, and we previously covered one of its Intel Core Ultra gaming handhelds) showcased a new modular Mini PC design dubbed Clink-X xCraft that has since been confirmed for a planned March 2025 crowdfunding launch. This Mini PC boasts an incredibly compact form factor and potentially offers some very interesting upgrades post-launch.

Of course, there are limitations to this modular mini PC design. Like modular Framework laptops or Framework-based devices, Emdoor Clink-X xCraft will only come with custom motherboards with soldered OEM CPUs. But since the motherboard is so easily removable compared to the majority of mini PC designs, long-term support could still offset the downsides of this, particularly if truly meaningful modular attachments like an extended heatsink, discrete graphics, etc, actually come to fruition.

As far as the current fixed specifications go, the only two CPU options currently given with the motherboard are Ryzen "Hawk Point" CPUs, but specifically the Ryzen 7 250 and 260— which are just a rebadged Ryzen 7 8840U and Ryzen 7 8845HS, respectively. Those two CPUs are also rebadged Ryzen 7 7840U and Ryzen 7 7845HS, respectively, which makes the additional renaming cycle quite egregious. With either CPU, you'll be getting eight Zen 4 cores and AMD RDNA 3 integrated graphics, with the differences boiling down to the CPU base clock.

AMD's Ryzen 7 250 and its eight Zen 4 cores have a base clock of 3.3 GHz and boost up to 5.1 GHz, and are paired with 12 RDNA 3 iGPU Compute Units for graphical horsepower. The Ryzen 7 260 and its eight Zen 4 cores have a base clock of 3.8 GHz, boost up to 5.1 GHz, and also have 12 RDNA 3 CUs. These are still good specs since part of the reason 7840U and its ilk were so endlessly rebadgeable was because their iGPU performance took that long to be exceeded by the competition, but it's still worth noting.

I/O is fixed regardless of your CPU and also replaces your PCIe expansion besides the dual NVMe slots. The fastest connectors are dual USB4 20 Gbps Type-C ports, with dual USB 3.2 Gen 2 ports (one Type-A, one Type-C) following directly behind. There is also a USB Type-C port specifically for power input, one HDM1 2.1 port, one DisplayPort 2.1 port, and a 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet port.

Storage and RAM support seem a little more interesting — with dual NVMe Gen4 slots (M.2-2280, up to 4TB) and support for up to 128GB of DDR5 RAM at 5600 MT/s, this mini PC definitely isn't slacking in those options. It's just a bit of a shame the CPU is soldered, but going unsoldered likely would have pushed them in the direction of AM4 or AM5 and presented a greater technical challenge for this form factor.

As-is, I think it looks decently promising, but the fastest expansion effectively being limited to dual USB4 20 Gbps does concern me, particularly at a $500 starting price point. OCuLink or even just a PCIe slot would be far preferable, particularly for whatever future discrete GPU attachments may be planned.

Asus just launched its next-generation NUC PCs, offering users everything from pure performance, aesthetics, and speed to a system primarily focused on efficiency. These new mini-PCs are the NUC 14 Pro AI+, NUC 15 Pro, NUC 15 Pro+, 2025 ROG NUC, and NUC 14 Essential, ensuring the company has an NUC device for every user.

The NUC 14 Pro AI+ is slightly improving on the NUC 14 Pro AI Asus launched in early September. Like the earlier version, this device has a Lunar Lake Intel Core Ultra Series 2 CPU with Intel Arc integrated graphics, delivering an overall performance of 120 TOPs. It sports two Thunderbolt 4 ports, 2,5G Ethernet, HDMI, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.2, and four USB Type-A ports, ensuring you’ll never run out of connectivity options to attach whatever you need to your PC.

However, the NUC 14 Pro AI+ stands out from the competition because of its multi-color e-ink display on top of the case. This allows you to display whatever image or icon you want, even when the device is turned off. It also has an ARGB ring around the top edge of the case to highlight your aesthetics better.

But if you need performance over looks, the Asus NUC 15 Pro and NUC 15 Pro+ will deliver with the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H and Intel Core Ultra 9 285H processors, respectively. These Arrow Lake chips are Intel’s mobile versions of its latest desktop chips, giving you the horsepower you need for whatever you’re doing while still ensuring a small and portable package. Aside from their numerous ports, including two HDMI 2.1 and two Thunderbolt 4 ports for four 4K displays, Asus gave these NUCs tool-free access, allowing users to maintain and upgrade these devices easily.

One weakness many mini-PCs have is the lack of a discrete GPU, and the ROG NUC fixed this by adding an Nvidia laptop GPU to deliver the needed graphical power. Asus upgraded the ROG NUC by giving it the latest performance parts: up to an Intel Core Ultra 9 processor and an RTX 50-series laptop GPU, giving it overall 200+ TOPS of performance. And despite its small size of just three liters, it runs quietly, even when pushed to its limits, because of its three fans and dual vapor chamber cooling solution.

Finally, not everyone needs this power and performance, so Asus released the NUC 14 Essential. This device uses Intel’s most efficient N-series chips, which could go as low as 6W. This means it has very little power draw and requires much less cooling, allowing Asus to fit all of it in a case that could go as small as 135 x 115 x 36 mm—about the size of a case fan. Still, you get the full Windows 11 OS and a plethora of ports—to USB Type-Cs, five USB Type-As, and a 2.5G Ethernet port. It also has Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3 for wireless connectivity.

These new devices prove that the NUC is not dead yet. Despite their small sizes, you can get the right NUC for your needs, no matter how efficient or powerful you need it to be.

Here at CES 2025, Mini PC manufacturer Geekom is showcasing its next-generation solutions and has one new desktop Mini PC with top-end mobile chips from AMD, Intel, and even Qualcomm. While Geekom claims its Snapdragon Mini PC will be the first to market, we've also spotted some Lenovo-made Qualcomm-powered Mini PCs on the CES 2024 show floor.

Narrowing in on Geekom's show floor presence, the focus is on the trio of upcoming Mini PCs: IT15, QS1, and A9 Max. We previously covered the tower-style Mega Mini G1 in a dedicated hands-on ahead of CES, but Geekom is also highlighting its already-released A6, which flaunts a last-gen AMD Ryzen 6700H with Radeon 680M iGPU.

On the Intel side, we have the Geekom IT15, which flaunts up to a Core Ultra 9 285H CPU or a Core Ultra 5 225H. Either CPU can be configured with Intel Arc XE-LPG A130T graphics and up to 64 GB DDR5-5800 RAM.W

The Geekom IT15's total size is 135.5 x 115.5 x 34.5 millimeters, so it seems Geekom isn't afraid to dedicate thermal mass to these new Intel CPUs. There's also room to mount one 2.5-inch SSD alongside two M.2 SSDs, though only one M.2 slot actually runs with NVMe Gen 4 bandwidth, with the other being SATA M.2.

In terms of I/O, the Geekom IT15 also seems fully featured, with 2 USB4 Type-C ports and 3 USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A ports onboard. Combined with 2 HDMI 2.0 ports, a 2.5G Ethernet port, a standard headphone jack, and even an SD card slot, the Geekom IT15 seems like a good choice for those wanting an Intel-powered Mini PC. Built-in Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 support ensure it shouldn't be lacking in connectivity options.

Unfortunately, further information on pricing or availability for this mini PC is not yet available.

More unique among Geekom's new contenders would be the Geekom QS1 Mini PC, which is the most compact of the new offerings at just 135.5 x 115.5 x 34.5 millimeters, built on top of a Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite chipset. Specifically, the X Elite X1E-80-100 with 12 CPU cores and an Adreno GPU is what's in use here, with an NPU advertised to reach up to 45 AI TOPS. RAM support goes as high as 64 GB of DDR4-8400 MT/s RAM, and storage support for up to 2 NVMe Gen 4 SSDs (one M.2-2280, one M.2-2230) is also included.

For the most part, the specifications we're seeing here are about in line with what we've come to expect in the Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite PCs we've seen elsewhere, especially in the laptop space. However, a change in form factor can't really address the overall issues with Snapdragon X Elite (particularly relating to software compatibility, etc.).

For those intrigued by a Snapdragon X Elite mini PC, though, Geekom does seem to be giving this one a fair shot. By targeting a sub-$500 price point, including Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4, and having a healthy I/O, Geekom may still land some sales with this unit. It includes 1 USB4 Type-C port, 3 USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A ports, 1 USB 2 Type-A port, 1 HDMI 2.0 port, 1 DisplayPort 1.4 port, a standard headphone jack, a 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet port, and even an SD card slot. Add some small hardware features like fingerprint unlock and an array of 4 digital built-in mics, and you may have a winner here...or at least, a piece of curiosity.

Last but certainly not least is the Geekom A9 Max, which is the biggest overall contender at 135 x 132 x 46.9 mm and likely the best overall performer thanks to AMD's onboard Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, complete with 12 cores, 24 threads, and an industry-leading Radeon 890M iGPU. There's also a slightly weaker AI 9 365 (10C,20T) configuration, which uses a weaker Radeon 880M but is otherwise the same. The onboard Ryzen NPU is rated for up to 55 AI TOPS.

As the larger footprint indicates, it would seem that the Geekom A9 Max is considered the new high-end of Geekom's Mini PCs, with AMD's sheer dominance in iGPU performance likely being why that choice was made. Giving this chipset the most cooling headroom makes sense, and like the other mini PCs in the lineup, the A9 Max supports up to 64 GB of DDR5 RAM, albeit limited to just 5600 MT/s. There's also support for dual NVMe Gen 4 drives but with mixed M.2-2280 (standard) and M.2-2230 (mini) slot support. Like all the other Geekom Mini PCs, the A9 Max also comes fully equipped with Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 support.

Of the offerings, the Geekom A9 Max has the more comprehensive I/O. I/O includes dual USB4 Type-C ports (one with power delivery support), a whopping 5 USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A ports, 1 USB2 Type-A port, 2 HDMI 2.0 ports, a standard headphone jack, an SD card slot, and dual 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet ports.

We’ve been visiting the booths at CES 2025 and have encountered some of the first desktop PCs on the market with Snapdragon X Plus and Snapdragon X processors. Lenovo also showcases two new mini-PCs using the Arm architecture: the ThinkCentre Neo 50q QC and the IdeaCentre Mini x, equipped with Qualcomm’s first-generation Snapdragon X chips.

Although compact, these mini-PCs deliver enough performance without a massive cooling solution. The ThinkCentre Neo 50q QC has a base Snapdragon X chip, but you can get the Snapdragon X Plus if you need more firepower. Its Hexagon NPU can deliver 45 TOPS, which is more than enough for your AI needs. It has up to 16GB of LPDDR5X memory and two M.2 SSD slots.

This mini-PC has numerous ports: one USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A and another USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C in front, alongside a 3.5mm combo audio jack. Looking at the back, you’ll see two USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A ports, two USB 2.0 Type-A ports, one HDMI 2.1 port, one DisplayPort 1.4a, and a 1G RJ45 Ethernet jack. You also get Wi-Fi 6E for wireless connectivity, ensuring that you won’t have any issues with this device regarding productivity.

Because of its Qualcomm Snapdragon X processor, the ThinkCentre only requires 90 watts of power. Unfortunately, though, it has a proprietary power plug. If you could power it via USB-C, you could likely use a 20,000 mAh power bank to run this mini-PC.

Lenovo also introduced the IdeaCentre Mini x, which is about the same size as the ThinkCentre but is built for professionals and creatives. Because of this, the company is limiting the processor for this mini-PC to the more powerful Snapdragon X Plus. We’re still hoping the company will release a more powerful Snapdragon X Elite variant, allowing us to get the best performance in such a small package.

Nevertheless, we want to see how these mini-PCs perform versus their laptop counterparts. After all, a Snapdragon X Elite chip pushed past 100 watts only delivered modest gains of 10% to 30% compared to four times more power consumption. So, we’d love to see what kind of optimizations Lenovo did on these Snapdragon chips.

Apple set a new benchmark for mini-PCs with its latest Mac mini M4. However, if you prefer different PC hardware and a Windows (or Linux) operating system, then the Nvisen GX06 might be for you. This Chinese mini-PC draws heavy inspiration from Apple’s newest compact PC, offering a similar aesthetic, but with more extensive connectivity options and the flexibility of x86 hardware.

While the overall design closely mirrors the Mac mini M4, there are a few key differences. For example, the power button is positioned on the front, unlike the Mac mini, where the power button is awkwardly placed on the bottom of the chassis, requiring the PC to be lifted to press it. It also comes in a darker hue and all of the ports are located on the rear. The new Wintel device measures 203 x 203 millimeters and stands 53 millimeters tall, making it incredibly compact and easy to fit into any workspace. It even features a raised bottom just like the Mac mini, to enhance airflow and cooling. Sadly, the listing does not give any details of the cooling solution.

Moving to the internals, the Nvisen GX06 is equipped with an Intel Core i9-12900H processor, a slightly older but formidable chip featuring 14 cores, 20 threads, and a boost clock speed of 5.0 GHz. It also features an Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 GPU with 6GB of VRAM allowing the mini-PC to handle light to moderate gaming and demanding applications like video editing. Additionally, it features 16GB of DDR5 RAM and a 1 TB M.2 SSD.

In terms of connectivity, the GX06 is well-equipped for its size. It offers one HDMI 2.1 port, two DisplayPort 1.4 outputs, and four USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports. Additionally, two Gigabit Ethernet ports are available for wired connections, along with separate microphone and headset jacks. For wireless connectivity, the GX06 supports Bluetooth 5.0 and Wi-Fi 6.

The GX06 ships with a 210-watt power supply, which should be adequate to power the components. It’s available for purchase on the Chinese e-commerce platform Banggood (linked top) for around $820, which seems rather pricey... Moreover, buyers should be aware of potential import fees, especially for shipments to the U.S., where customs charges may apply for orders like this. We also found that the specifications listed are slightly different from the actual product shown in the pictures, so we highly recommend that you proceed with caution.

Asus's upcoming ROG NUC 2025 mini PC has been revealed a bit ahead of schedule. The new computer's appearance and existence were reportedly leaked in a social media teaser video early this morning on Facebook and X (formerly Twitter), before being swiftly removed.

According to the leaked hype post, the Asus ROG NUC 2025 will be powered by an Intel Core Ultra 200-series processor. It is expected to be Intel's top-of-the-line Core Ultra 9 285H, the natural successor to the Core Ultra 9 185H found in the 2024 ROG NUC. The leak also confirmed that the NUC will contain Nvidia RTX 50-series graphics, a series widely expected to be announced at CES 2025 in early January.

The 2025 ROG NUC has been confirmed to be revealed at CES 2025. This date adds veracity to the leak's claim of RTX 50-series graphics; likely a mobile RTX 5060/5070 board. The 2025 ROG NUC will also likely come with a slew of other, less powerful NUCs from Asus; the 2024 ROG NUC was the flagship product among a stable of five other NUC SKUs, ranging from $1,199 to $1,999.

The existence of the social media leaks themselves is difficult to confirm. The only trace left of the posts is a Weibo post which contains the screenshots seen above, under the article headline. The NUC in the screenshots takes on a more angular appearance than its predecessor, sporting a boxier design and a proudly exposed cooling fan.

Assuming the leaks are not extremely elaborate 3D-modelled hoaxes, the 2025 ROG NUC seems to be a powerhouse. Like its predecessor, the 2024 ROG NUC, it is expected to be a highly-specialized product, carrying a matching price tag. The 2024 NUC launched at $2,000, though it is still unclear how much if at all Nvidia raises its prices on the RTX 50-series.

To see the 2025 ROG NUC's legitimate reveal and announcement, Asus will reveal its upcoming ROG slate at CES 2025, beginning on January 7th, 2025. Tom's Hardware will be live-covering the newest releases, announcements, and events at the forum on our CES 2025 landing page, including Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang's highly-hyped opening keynote on the 6th.

Cirrus7 Incus, a redesigned passively cooled mini-PC from German PC manufacturer Cirrus7, was originally released in October 2019. The company recently updated its lineup of Cirrus7 Incus models to support AMD Ryzen 9000 series CPUs [h/t FanlessTech].

Since our original coverage, the lineup has also been upgraded with Intel 14th Gen support, though the Ryzen 9000 series will likely be the more compelling choice for most users. Cirrus7 Incus' designs are all based directly on the ASRock DeskMini mini-PC designs, which use a custom Mini-STX motherboard and case—though Cirrus7 is using a highly overhauled design for its passive cooling aims with Incus.

Cirrus7 highlights in its official documentation that the three distinct cooling designs (Standard Edition, Extended Cooling Edition, and Extreme Cooling Edition) are passive cooling solutions with thermal mass and case dimensions corresponding to intended workloads. The Extreme Cooling design is intended for full-time, high-wattage use with CPUs like the Ryzen 7 9700X, while the other designs are more appropriate for lower-power APUs. However, Extended Cooling or better is likely best for chips with a Radeon 780M iGPU or better.

*Technically based on but considerably changed from various models of ASRock DeskMini mini-PCs, ranging from DeskMini X300 and DeskMini X600, which use AMD CPUs, and DeskMini B760, based on an Intel platform.

**Any "Cooling Edition" can be used with any platform—this distinction is made to illustrate dimension and I/O differences between otherwise identical PCs more clearly.

The cheapest starting configuration, including the full-fat Ryzen 9700X and Extreme Cooling Edition design, starts at 1076€ Euros and includes 8GB of DDR5-4800 RAM and a 250GB Samsung 980 NVMe 3.0 drive. While the starting memory and storage specs are relatively humble, these specifications can be configured much higher, with plenty of storage configuration options available thanks to 4 total SSD connectors (2 SATA, 2 NVMe M.2).

For those who are fans of passive cooling and mini-PC designs, the Cirrus7 Incus may be a winner for its cooling capacity, compact size, and reasonably balanced aesthetics. The acceptable pricing will, of course, vary depending on the buyer. However, we recommend that those interested in PC gaming opt for an AM5 APU with an onboard Radeon 780M rather than a Radeon 7 9700X configuration with a weaker iGPU. Unfortunately, eGPU options don't look great with this mini PC, so be extra wary of the balance between CPU and iGPU you're picking at checkout.

Geekom says that it will launch the Geekom QS1, Geekom A9 Max, and Geekom IT15 in Las Vegas, all of which are powered by the latest chips, as well as show off its recently launched Geekom A6, which is its contender for the sub-$500 market.

Mini-PC maker Geekom is set to reveal new models powered by the latest chips at CES 2025. These devices would include some of the most powerful next-generation processors from Intel, AMD, and Qualcomm, giving users the freedom to choose between Team Blue or Team Red if they want an x86 chip or maybe be a bit more adventurous and go for a Snapdragon X Elite-powered desktop.

The Geekom QS1 would be one of the headlining products in the Geekom booth, especially as it’s the first Snapdragon X mini-PC after Qualcomm suddenly canceled its $899 dev kit. This tiny Windows 11 on Arm PC is powered by a Snapdragon X1E-80-100 chip with twelve 4.0 GHz Oryon CPU cores, a 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 GPU, and a 45 TOPS NPU. The company didn’t say much more about the QS1 in its press release, but previous leaks suggest that it would come with up to 64GB of dual-channel RAM, up to 2TB M.2 2280 storage, Wi-Fi 7, and Bluetooth 5.4. We also expect it to come with a biometric fingerprint sensor in the power button, allowing you to take advantage of Windows Hello.

If you’re an Intel fan, Geekom also has something for you—the IT15. This tiny desktop packs the latest Intel Arrow Lake-H chips, allowing you to equip it with the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H. The Intel Core Ultra 200H isexpected to launch at CES 2025, too, meaning Geekom would be among the first manufacturers to offer these powerful processors to the public.

Finally, we expect the Geekom A9 Max with an AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 processor under its hood. The HX 375 is at the top of AMD’s Strix Point product stack, with four Zen 5 and eight Zen 5c cores, giving it 12 and 24 threads. It also has a Radeon 890M integrated GPU and could deliver up to 80 TOPS of AI performance, allowing it to beat the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V in LLM performance. The company also said it will show off the more affordable Geekom A6, with its AMD Ryzen 7 6800H chip, Radeon 680M integrated GPU, 32GB of DDR5 RAM, and 1TB of storage.

We can’t wait until January 7 to see the exact specifications and pricing of these new Geekom models. In addition, we expect to see a flurry of next-generation releases, like the Nvidia RTX 5000 and AMD RX 8000 GPUs, which we expect to be revealed at CES 2025.

Amidst the chaos of October, Minisforum launched the MS-A1 AM5 mini-PC with both barebones and a Ryzen 7 8700G configuration— but earlier this morning, Minisforum also added a new variant with Ryzen 9 9950X.

Compared to other mini PCs, which usually don't come in alternative barebones forms, MS-A1 may be the most price-accessible, customizable mini-PC on the market, especially keeping that AM5 socket and OCuLink eGPU support in mind. Every configuration of the device comes in the same 189.5 x 186 x 48 mm form factor (longest side 7.4 inches).

Now, before making any recommendations, it's worth noting that with current market conditions in mind, you're mostly just paying for convenience if you opt for the Ryzen 9 9950X or Ryzen 7 8700G models since you can acquire separate CPU, memory, and RAM for less money if you opt for the barebones kit instead.

Bringing your Ryzen 9 9950X and matching RAM/storage for capacity could save you over $100, though you must be mindful of form factor restrictions. Fortunately, the mini-PC enclosure has its cooler built-in, so you don't need to worry about adding fans or buying an additional heatsink if you bring your CPU, though you may want to have a thermal paste kit on hand just in case.

*Note: The front M.2 slots seem to be smaller M.2-2230 rather than standard M.2-2280 slots. One may also be taken by opting for M.2 Wi-Fi/BT expansion, which is also supported.

The Minisforum MS-A1 is quite compelling as a barebones AM5 Mini PC kit. Its fully featured I/O, including USB 4 and OCuLink, should enable all the expansion end users need, significantly leveraging high-end desktop GPUs rather than compromised mobile GPUs. Those who want to maintain away-from-dock graphics performance can opt for a build or model with an APU like the Ryzen 8700G. In contrast, those who wish to prioritize multi-core performance could opt for a Ryzen 9 9950X config or go full custom with a gaming powerhouse like the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Of course, those hoping to make the most of a mini-PC like this must pair it with an appropriate OCuLink eGPU docking station. To cut down on extraneous PSU cable routing, I recommend the Aoostar AG02 or AG01 docking stations, which include integrated PSUs capable of handling the best graphics cards within wattage limits.

On the note of wattage limits, this mini-PC is noted as only supporting 100W-120W in its documentation despite being able to use a Ryzen 9 9950X rated for a much higher TDP— we firmly recommend that anybody using higher-end CPUs with this mini-PC enable Eco Mode in the BIOS as quickly as possible, which should prevent power usage issues and not majorly impact performance, especially for a chip like Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Mini-PC manufacturer Geekom is the first maker to announce a desktop PC powered by a Snapdragon X Elite chip after Qualcomm abruptly canceled the Snapdragon X Elite dev kit. While initial leaks did not provide additional information, El Chapuzas Informatico (machine translated) was able to find and share the specifications of the Arm-powered mini-PC.

According to the Spanish tech publication, the QS1 Pro is powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 SoC paired with an Adreno GPU rated at up to 4.6 TFLOPs. It will also have up to 64GB of dual-channel LPDRR5-5600 memory and up to 2TB of M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 storage.

What’s interesting about the leaked information is that its CPU, the Snapdragon X1E-80-100, does not match the stated 4.6-TFLOP output of the Adreno GPU. The X1E-80-100's GPU could only hit 3.8 TFLOPs, as per Qualcomm’s documentation, while the GPU for the higher tier X1E-84-100 is rated for 4.6 TFLOPs.

As El Chapuzas says, we’re unsure if this is just a typographical error or if Geekom was able to up the chip’s performance by applying more voltage, especially as it’s no longer constrained by the limited space and power that many laptops have to deal with. Nevertheless, initial tests have shown that putting more power into a Snapdragon X Elite only offers a limited performance uplift.

Also, note that since the Snapdragon X Elite is an integrated system, like the Intel Core Ultra 200V (Lunar Lake) series, you cannot upgrade the memory capacity of this mini-PC after you get it. Nevertheless, its maximum capacity of 64GB of dual-channel LPDDR5-5600 memory is more than enough for most applications today. You probably don’t have to worry much about getting more RAM in the next few years. The mini-PC also has excellent wireless connectivity options, equipped with Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4.

Unfortunately, we have no information yet about the launch timeline or pricing of the Geekom QS1 Pro. Previously, the most affordable Qualcomm Snapdragon X PC was Qualcomm’s dev kit, priced at $899. However, with its discontinuation, we hope the QS1 Pro will replace that, allowing more users, especially developers, to get into Windows on Arm.

Chinese computer manufacturer Geekom is reportedly preparing the QS series of mini-PCs powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite chip. According to the Lonely City Hardware (machine translated) on Weibo (h/t Neowin), this device will be the first Snapdragon X Elite mini-PC, especially as Qualcomm unexpectedly canceled the Snapdragon X Elite dev kit. However, we don’t know the mini-PC’s specifications, pricing, or additional information.

All that we see in the leaked image is the device’s exterior case, which features the power button, two USB-A ports, and a 3.5mm combo jack. This looks similar to the Geekom A7, a mini-PC powered by an AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, and has a similar front button layout, case design, and color. If this mini-PC launches, it will help Qualcomm reach more customers, especially as it promised in Computex 2024 that the Snapdragon is coming to “all PC form factors,” including desktop PCs. While the mini-PC is not precisely a full-blow desktop CPU with largely interchangeable components (like a discrete GPU), it still has a niche, especially for users who do not require portability but have little desk space.

We want to see what the Qualcomm Snapdragon chips can do when freed from battery limitations. After all, while these chips are very efficient and allow your laptop to last weeks on a single charge, they reportedly don’t offer much performance past 100 watts. Nevertheless, a mini-PC’s small size would likely make the Snapdragon X Elite a great candidate for powering one. After all, other mini-PCs, like the Minisforum 790S7 and Atom Man G7 Ti, use processors designed for laptops.

However, one downside of an Arm-based mini-PC is its lack of expandability and compatibility. The Snapdragon X chips use integrated memory, so you can’t upgrade your PC once you’ve picked a RAM capacity. There’s also limited support for discrete GPUs, so the QS mini-PC won’t be a great gaming device. But if all you need is a tiny little PC for basic tasks, like web browsing, office typing, and streaming, then a Qualcomm Snapdragon X mini-PC might be a great option that won’t break the bank but will offer above-average performance.

Microsoft just launched the Windows 365 Link, a mini-PC designed to run Windows 365 Cloud PCs. The company said on its blog that it starts at just $349 and will connect quickly and securely to Windows 365 servers. This device is marketed toward businesses and enterprise customers, especially as these organizations sometimes replace their computers every two to five years.

However, you should note that you still need a Windows 365 subscription, priced between $28 to $315 a month per user. Microsoft says that its 4v CPU option with 16GB of RAM and 128GB of storage, starting at $66 a month per user, is most popular for employees “who only use Microsoft Teams, browsers, or Microsoft applications.” That costs $1,584 over 24 months — and when you add the $349 initial cost for the hardware, you’re paying nearly $2,000 for a basic cloud PC.

For just $1,299.99, you could get a Microsoft Surface Laptop powered by a Snapdragon X Elite chip, with a 15-inch touchscreen, the same memory size, and double the storage.

The specifications for the processor and memory are unknown. However, the Windows 365 Link features three USB-A ports, one USB-C port, one HDMI port, and one DisplayPort output. As a result, the device can accommodate up to two 4.K monitors. There's a 3.5mm audio jack for connecting headphones and a Kensington lock port for security. Regarding connectivity, there's one Ethernet port and Wi-Fi 6E with Bluetooth.

The company claims that the Windows 365 Link gives you a security advantage, especially as its locked-down operating system means end-users cannot install apps and store data locally. This helps reduce security vulnerabilities by locking down the device. It also offers passwordless authentication via Microsoft Entra ID and multifactor authentication via the Microsoft Authenticator app, QR code, or USB security key.

Despite the higher price, a few enterprise users have found the Windows 365 Link helpful. They say it allows workers to quickly rotate between stations without bringing their computers while keeping their files and access secure in the cloud. Furthermore, Windows 365 Link makes it easier for IT departments to manage cloud-based software and hardware.

Windows 365 Link makes no sense for individual users who have kept their computers for several years. But if you’re an enterprise with hundreds, if not thousands, of desk-bound workers that come and go, a cloud-based operating system might be an optimal solution for making it easier to manage your computer infrastructure while keeping everything secure.

The Windows 365 Link won't be available until April 2025; you can ask to join the preview program if you live in the U.S., Canada, the U.K., Germany, Japan, Australia, or New Zealand. Microsoft recommends interested users contact their Microsoft account team to join the program before December 15.

A powerful new SBC (via ETA Prime) that puts an AMD Phoenix chip in the palm of your hand is on its way to crowdfunding. In addition to the star attraction of the Ryzen 7 7840HS processor with Radeon 780M iGPU, the device comes blessed with a trio of M.2 PCIe Gen4 SSD slots (and up to 32GB of RAM).

While the AMD 7000 series mobile processors are a couple of generations old, they still offer enough processing power for all but the most strenuous tasks. The Phoenix 7040 series was particularly admired at launch for its compelling balance of CPU and iGPU prowess. This chip on a handy tiny SBC, albeit one crowned with a lump of a black shroud, seems like an attractive proposition to PC tinkerers, enthusiasts, and DIYers.

As the intro indicates, the Next-SBC’s feature set is nicely balanced. Complementing the AMD APU, the system will come with up to 32GB of onboard LPDDR5X-6400 memory and three M.2 PCIe Gen4 SSD slots. While potential buyers will need to ensure they make the correct memory configuration choice (soldered, so non-upgradeable), the device’s storage capabilities are quite stellar. These easy-access slots provide many storage and M.2 peripheral options.

The Next-SBC’s specs include a decent array of I/O. For physical ports, you will have access to various USB Type-A and Type-C ports, up to USB4. There are also dual HDMI 2.1 and dual 2.5G Ethernet ports. Given the scarce information, we aren’t sure whether users will have to use one of the M.2 slots to add Wi-Fi/Bluetooth if desired.

TechTuber ETA Prime showcased a Next-SBC prototype review unit this weekend if you want to see more of it in person. As is customary, he tested the device in a selection of popular games and benchmarks.

Those curious about the sudden arrival of the Next-SBC might welcome the work of some Redditor sleuths, who indicate that this SBC is probably a repurposing of the motherboard of the AooStar GEM10 7840HS mini PC. Aoostar is probably best known for its compact NAS solutions, mini PCs, and eGPUs. Perhaps the Indiegogo crowdfunding campaign will be posted under this brand when the time comes.

The so-called Next-SBC will hit Indiegogo soon. Pricing for this pocketful of power is expected to start at around $329.

VideoCardz has spotted a review of the FEVM FN60G, a mini-PC aesthetically inspired by Apple's Mac Studio. The tiny monster packs a punch, leveraging a Core i9-14900KF processor and an Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU.

The FEVM FN60G is a mini-PC with a smaller footprint than the Mac Studio, although it’s a bit taller. But despite its tiny dimensions—it is smaller than a mini-ITX motherboard—it packs a serious punch with an Intel Core i9-14900KF processor and an Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU.

You also get two slots for DDR5-5200 SODIMMs and a single NVMe M.2 PCIe 4.0 slot, although we don’t have any information about its maximum memory and storage capacity yet. The FN60G also uses a Thermalright AIO liquid cooling solution, allowing the processor to stretch its legs without being limited by thermal throttling.

This mini-PC measures a measly 16.8 x 16.8 x 13.7cm, comparable to the 19.7 x 19.7 x 9.5cm size of the Apple Mac Studio. However, the i9-14900K beats the M2 Ultra in both single-core and multi-core performance, plus you get a discrete graphics card with the Windows mini-PC.

FEVM gave the FN60G many ports: a DC barrel input plug, two HDMI 2.1 ports, two DisplayPort 1.4s, four USB-A ports, a USB-C port, and two Ethernet jacks in the rear. In the front, you also get two USB-A ports, another USB-C port, a 3.5mm combo jack, and an SD card reader. Finally, you get wireless connectivity via Wi-Fi 7.

The FN60G primarily competes with other high-powered mini-PCs on the market. These include the Minisforum AtomMan G7 Pt, which has an AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and a Radeon RX 7600M XT GPU, and the Asus ROG NUC, with its Intel Core Ultra 9 185H chip and RTX 4070 desktop graphics card. With its heavy-weight processor, the FN60G is the most powerful mini-PC among the bunch.

And although it just uses an RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, it’s about as capable as an RTX 3090 Ti desktop GPU, which is nothing to sneeze at. It could even outperform the RTX 4070 desktop graphics card in the ROG NUC and the Radeon RX 7600M XT in the AtomMan G7 Pt.

What’s more important about this mini-PC is that you can upgrade many parts. You can easily replace its CPU, memory, and storage. You can also replace the MXM GPU, giving you an advantage over high-power laptops with limited upgradability. So, if you’re looking for a high-performance PC that won’t take up too much space on your desktop, you should check out the FEVM FN60G.

Apple's latest M4 Mini features NAND modules that can be upgraded if you're proficient enough in micro-soldering, as dosdude1 shows in his latest machine teardown.

The M4 Mac Mini starts at just $599, putting many Windows machines to shame in terms of performance and pricing. But like all Apple machines, these are not self-serviceable and upgradable—starting with a paltry 256GB of SSD storage.

Users looking for higher capacities must pay a pretty penny since the 512GB version starts at $799, with a $200 upcharge for 256GB of extra storage. And for the unseasoned, this isn't like the desktop landscape where you could swap in your old SSD with a fancier, faster, and larger version. The NAND modules are soldered onto a PCB, and the memory controller is on the SoC. Better yet, older designs had the entire assembly packaged onto the SoC - so any severe damage would've rendered the system as good as dead.

Like the Mac Studio, the M4 Mac Mini has a PCB with two NAND chips - one at the front and one at the back. Theoretically, you could swap these two modules and replace them with more capacity.

However, Apple employs a firmware lock that ties the serial number of each module with the controller on the SoC, so you cannot reuse already-programmed NAND modules from a spare machine. The user desoldered the existing NAND chips and replaced them with two blank 1TB "K6B2" NAND modules, as these chips were known to work with the MacBook Air M3 and even the iPhone 14, 15, and 16.

The first attempt didn't go as planned since one of the chips was a dud. After attempting the process again with two 512GB chips (1TB) and setting everything up, the system booted and reported "994GB" of storage—a great success! A quick search on AliExpress shows that you can obtain these chips for roughly $100, but we're not suggesting you do so since this process is not intended for the average consumer.

The takeaway is that blank or unused NAND chips can work with Apple's proprietary controller. Still, you need a separate Mac to install the Operating System and might have to perform a DFU reset to restore the controller to factory settings. Such upgrades have been available for a while but come at the cost of potential damage to the system or the proprietary PCB.

Apple’s Mac Mini hasn't received a meaningful design upgrade since 2010, when the first Intel systems with a unibody design were released. But after many, many iterative designs, the new Mac Mini built around Apple Silicon is impressively small and extremely powerful. 

Starting at $599 with the M4 system on a chip, 16GB of RAM, and 256GB of storage, this could be a value family computer for those set on macOS. But we went hands-on with a far pricier $2,299 model that had us wondering if it's worth it when the Mac Studio exists.

The Mac Mini is an impressive machine on a technical level and takes up very little space on your desk. So let's turn this review upside down, press the power button, and get started.

Design of the Mac Mini (M4 Pro)

The Mac Mini is adorable. The Mac Mini looks like the Mac Studio brought its kid to work wearing a suit to match their parent.

At 5 inches by 5 inches wide and deep and just 2 inches tall, the Mac Mini takes up very little room on a desk. It's not quite as small as an Apple TV, but it's noticeably smaller than the Mac Studio, which is 7.7 x 7.7 x 3.7 inches. I don't think it's a make or break size, but for Mac users without exposure to NUC-style PCs, it's damn impressive (the Asus NUC Pro, sold barebones without RAM, storage, or an operating system, is 4.6 x 4.4 x 1.46 inches).

Perhaps the biggest design improvement outside of size is the fact that Apple has added ports to the front. Where the previous Mac Mini front was featureless, the new Mini has a pair of USB Type-C ports and a headphone jack. 

On the back, there's room for the power cable, an Ethernet jack (our unit had 10 Gigabit Ethernet), an HDMI port, and three Thunderbolt 5 ports. On models with the base M4, you'll get a trio of Thunderbolt 4 ports, instead.

And then there's the power button, which is on the bottom of the device. Specifically, it's in the back left corner. While the base of the Mac makes it appear to slightly float off a desk, there's not nearly enough room to jam a finger in there. You have to lift the desktop up to hit the power button.

There has been a lot of online discourse over whether or not it matters where the Mac Mini's power button is. Some enthusiasts and power users have suggested they never turn their Macs off, and that with how little power the Mini will sip in sleep mode, it's a non-issue. Other people turn their desktops off daily. Upon the news of the button being on the bottom, some of my colleagues shrugged — they never turn their desktops off. Others said they'd be annoyed but would probably switch to leaving their systems on in perpetuity.

Regardless, I think it was a poor choice. The power button provides an important function. Having to lift up the Mac Mini to turn it on for the first time isn't a great introduction, especially with all of the cables and your accessories plugged in. I'm not sure whyApple couldn't fit the button on any one of the four sides of the Mini. I'd even take a capacitive button like the one on the AirPods 4 case if it meant not disturbing the design. The fact that people have taken to making 3D printed switches to hit the bottom of the case suggests that at least someone cares.

Be sure to think carefully about the Mac Mini's specs before purchasing. There aren't any exposed screws on this system. I'm sure some industrious teardown artists will take a spudger to the plastic bottom of the machine, but this isn't a system that will allow for RAM or storage upgrades after the fact – although you could of course plug in one of the best external SSDs to add secondary storage.

Mac Mini (M4 Pro) Specifications

Productivity Performance on the Mac Mini

We went hands-on with an extremely high-end version of the Mac Mini. It came with an M4 Pro boasting a 14-core CPU and 20-core GPU, 48GB of LPDDR5 RAM, and 1TB of SSD storage. The M4 Pro did a tremendous job in our performance tests. Without a battery, there was no reason to also test on high-performance mode, though we only saw benefits from that in our most prolonged benchmark.

If you look through our benchmark results, you'll see that the M4 Pro was largely consistent between power modes on bursty benchmarks, including Geekbench 6. Interestingly, on slightly longer benchmarks like Handbrake, the 16-inch MacBook Pro came out ahead, even when the Mac Mini was using high power mode. 

Where high power mode made the biggest difference for the Mac Mini was in our Cinebench 2024 multi-threaded stress test. Here, the Mac Mini scored significantly better on high power mode. On the default automatic power setting, the M4 Pro topped out at 1,691 in a very consistent run, while the high power mode was a bit more erratic with some apparent warm-up runs, but ended up with scores in the high 1,750's. Again, though, the 16-inch MacBook Pro in auto matched the Mac Mini on high power. Perhaps this has to do with cooling.

Other than performance, the biggest difference with high-power mode and auto is fan noise. On automatic, the Mac Mini was silent for two runs, while on high power, the Mac had some fan noise immediately and then sounded like the world's tiniest vacuum cleaner from then on.

During Cinebench, we log Macs with TG Pro. Unfortunately, these new Macs are too new for the software to recognize the chips. But we can learn about average system heat and fan speeds. Interestingly, the high-power mode had the overall system running cooler (62 degrees Celsius versus 65.5 degrees Celsius, when taking measurement from power management sensors, power supply, and SSD). But that may be because of how fast the fans were spinning. On average, the default setting had the fans spin at 3,034.71 rotations per minute, while high power mode put it at 4,548.82 rpm.

On the Xcode benchmark, the Mac Mini compiled a large codebase for iOS in 94 seconds, showing significant gains over the vanilla M4.

Gaming and Graphics on the Mac Mini

While Apple is still at work (and still has much to do) when it comes to turning the Mac into a serious gaming platform, it's hard to deny that the M4 Pro's 20-core GPU and 48GB of unified RAM don't make for some impressive performance. 

Resident Evil 4 looked excellent on a Mac Studio Display witih HDR mode on. With the resolution set to 2560 x 1440, I set all the settings as high as they go and hit the 60 fps frame cap on that monitor. 

The remake of Myst was more of a challenge, especially with ray tracing. With the game at 1080p, the settings preset to high, and super sampling set to ultra performance, the game often ran at 60 fps. But near water, the frame rate would often chug, at times below 30 fps, and sometimes down into single digits. Shadows looked impressive and didn't have the same effect on frame rate. Turning down the settings much lower helped with frame rate stability.

macOS Sequoia and Apple Intelligence

The Mac Mini ships with macOS Sequoia, which launched in October. As usual, it's a sleek operating system that includes useful preinstalled apps and little to no bloat.

macOS Sequoia is feature-packed with plenty of new abilities. I've particularly appreciated iPhone Mirroring, which lets you use most of the features on your iPhone without needing to pick up the device, as well as the ability to get my iPhone notifications in macOS. The new Window tiling is a big improvement, particularly on a high-res desktop monitor, but it's not quite as good as the Snap Layouts in Windows 11.

Preinstalled apps include Safari, Mail, Messages, Calculator, Weather, Notes, Maps, and FaceTime, as well as basic productivity software in GarageBand, Pages, Keynote, and Numbers. There's also dedicated software for Apple's subscription services, including Podcasts, Apple Music, Apple TV, and Apple News.

Apple still includes Rosetta 2, a translation layer for software written for Intel CPUs. Most of the apps that I use have moved over to native Arm versions or are using universal binaries, so I rarely worry about it. Valve's Steam launcher, which some Mac gamers may use, is the one that always summons up the Rosetta notification, though many games that work are optimized for Apple Silicon.

Sequoia 15.1 is where Apple is debuting Apple Intelligence, but only a few of the promised features arrived with that update.

I do appreciate some of the changes to Siri. The ability to double-press Command to launch Siri and type to it makes a ton of sense on the Mac — much more so than speaking aloud to my desktop when other people are around. I also like that Siri can access user guides to tell me more about my Mac if I'm looking for settings. But other changes to Siri, like ChatGPT integration, are expected in macOS 15.2 and 15.3, and meaningful changes that will let the assistant access your email, calendar and text, as well as answer questions about what's on screen and take actions in apps aren't here yet.

I also like notification summaries, which can put multiple emails, texts, and other notifications together. In general, it works well, though it does occasionally make mistakes, some of which are very funny.

Clean Up in photos lets you erase background distractions. This makes it easier than ever to do, but Apple is catching up to Google and Adobe here. Apple's Writing Tools let you proofread, summarize, or re-write text in different tones. As someone who writes for a living, I find this all kind of impersonal, though I could see how the summarization option can be useful for very long emails. Still, the AI can miss things, so you'll ultimately want to read that email.

Other upcoming tools include Image Playground, which will let you create images in a cartoon style. But while this and some other features are available in developer betas, they won't be available on Mac Mini on launch day. That means that as of this writing, Apple Intelligence doesn't make a huge splash, despite future potential.

While Apple is pushing Apple Intelligence on its lineup of M4 Macs (so much so that they're all starting with 16GB of base RAM now. About time!), you can use these features on any Mac with an M-series chip.

Mac Mini Configurations and Warranty

Apple loaned us a very high-end Mac Mini. It came with an M4 Pro boasting a 14-core CPU and 20-core GPU, 48GB of LPDDR5 RAM, 1TB of SSD storage, and 10 Gigabit Ethernet. That adds up to $2,299.

I think the entry-level Mac Mini, a $599 box with M4, 16GB of RAM, and 256GB of storage will be a far more enticing buy to a broad audience that just needs a family computer. That price puts Apple in a great spot compared to big box PCs, though the 256GB SSD will be limiting for many. It's great to see Apple jump to 16GB of RAM on the base model. For Apple, this is as close as a current-generation Mac might ever get to an impulse purchase.

But the upgrades to RAM and storage are outrageous. Bumping from 16GB to 24GB of RAM is $200, and the upgrade to 32GB is another $200. Storage has a similar issue: $200 jumps between 512GB and 1TB, and an extra $400 on top of that to get to 2TB. 10 Gigabit Ethernet is $100.

In fact, the upgrade prices are so big that you can buy two entry-level Mac Minis for the price of a single system with upgrades to 32GB of RAM and a 512GB SSD.

When you get to our review unit, though, you're getting into Mac Studio territory. That beefier system starts at $1,999.99 with an M2 Max, 32GB of RAM, 512GB of storage, 10 Gigabit Ethernet and offers more ports, not to mention a massive cooling system and a chip that is in some ways, more powerful.

Specifically, the M2 Max has fewer CPU cores than the M4 Pro, but if you're looking for graphics performance, the 30-core GPU may still be up your alley. That being said, an M4 Max does exist in the MacBook Pro, but not the Studio. And there are rumors of an M4 Ultra on the horizon, putting the Studio in a weird spot right now.

Apple sells the Mac Mini with a one-year warranty. AppleCare Plus is $34.99 annually or $99 for a fixed three years and includes chassis damage and accidental damage for additional fees.

Bottom Line

I came away largely impressed with the Mac Mini from my time with it. It's small, powerful, and stays out of the way.

The $599 version sounds like the first real Mac value in a long time, though I'd still love to see a boost beyond the base 256GB of storage. It's harder to swallow the $2,299 machine we reviewed though, as you're getting into Mac Studio territory (and if you're configuring it with this much RAM, and storage, you may well want a bigger, more powerful machine).

The Mac Mini makes sense as a family computer for those who want to routinely replace their monitors in a way that's more flexible than an iMac. If you want that to be incredibly powerful, you can make that happen with a high-end config. But I think for many, this will make an excellent M4 box.