Skip to main content

System Builder Marathon: $1,250 Mid-Range PC

Benchmark Results: Synthetic Benchmarks

Note that this time we're comparing three systems and each system is compared at both stock clock speeds and when overclocked. The blue bars represent the Q9550-based system, the green bars represent the Core i7 920 system, and the red bars represent the E8500 system. The darker bars are the overclocked results.

Let's start with 3DMark Vantage:

First of all, we must remember that the Core i7 system is the only PC with a Radeon HD 4850 X2 instead of the superior 4870 X2 found in the E8500 and Q9550 systems. This explains the notable deficit the i7-based system is showing. There is a large difference between the Q9550 and E8500 systems, with 3DMark heavily favoring the quad-core CPU. I'm not entirely confident that this will be the case with most games, as many titles are more GPU-dependent than they are CPU-dependent.

Now let's move on to Futuremark's productivity-oriented benchmark, PCMark Vantage:

PCMark Vantage suggests that the quad-core options will significantly beat out dual-core CPUs in most tasks, regardless of clock speeds. It also indicates that the new Core i7 will have an advantage over the Q9550 despite its smaller cache.

Let's see what SiSoft Sandra XII has to say:

Sandra disagrees with PC Mark, indicating a massive advantage with the new Core i7 compared to the Q9550, although it favors the Q9550 over the E8500 by a notable margin as well. As for memory bandwidth, the Q9550 performs closely to the E8500, while both of them get trounced by the new on-CPU memory controller in the Core i7.

All of the synthetics seem to favor quad-core over clock speed, but we know this isn't always the case in actual applications. Let's see what kind of media-encoding capabilities these platforms have.

  • johnyeah
    I just checked, I was wondering if the HD 4850 x2 (2x1gb) was a better choice at only $240? That would cut the cost by an additional.
    Reply
  • xx12amanxx
    Phenom 2 940 is 40$ dollars cheaper overclock's to 3.7-3.9 on air runs cooler and performs the same. Not sure why you went with an equal performing lower overclocking higher power using and almost 40$ more expensive cpu.
    Reply
  • Tindytim
    You're $96 under budget, but you couldn't splurge on a better case?

    Unless you made a Typo on one of those prices, they all add up to the 1154 total. So why are you so under budget?
    Reply
  • Crashman
    xx12amanxxPhenom 2 940 is 40$ dollars cheaper overclock's to 3.7-3.9 on air runs cooler and performs the same. Not sure why you went with an equal performing lower overclocking higher power using and almost 40$ more expensive cpu.
    Can't use a processor that doesn't exist. They weren't on the market when the parts were ordered...what, you thought these articles were produced overnight?

    TindytimYou're $96 under budget, but you couldn't splurge on a better case?Unless you made a Typo on one of those prices, they all add up to the 1154 total. So why are you so under budget?
    Prices dropped after the parts were ordered: The same thing happens to EVERY builder, the system loses value almost as soon as you can click the "buy" icon.
    Reply
  • Tindytim
    CrashmanPrices dropped after the parts were ordered: The same thing happens to EVERY builder, the system loses value almost as soon as you can click the "buy" icon.Wait, wait, wait.

    You mention that in the $625 article, but those were the prices at purchase. Why the inconsistency?
    Reply
  • Crashman
    TindytimWait, wait, wait.You mention that in the $625 article, but those were the prices at purchase. Why the inconsistency?
    Ask the author of the other article? I only know that the more expensive a part is, the more money you loose when the price drops.
    Reply
  • maxwellsmart_80
    *SIGH* Yet ANOHTER "Intel System Build Marathon" machine...just kidding - I understand what you are saying about the Phenom II 940 not being available at the time of component purchase - It would be nice to see some AMD in next months articles though!

    P.S. - you were under budget, why not go w/ the Antec Three Hundred Case - it's 1000% nicer than the Rosewill Piece 'o Junk you picked, and would have cooled your Overclock a lot better IMHO...just a thought - it's a killer case for the money - have you ever used it in a system build?
    Reply
  • yellowfever
    This is my first time commenting on any article at Tom's after reading everyday for 6+ years, but seeing the UD3LR motherboard pick instead of the equally priced UD3R ($2 more after rebate) or UD3P($12 more after rebate) is ridiculous for a computer hardware website. Both boards would let you do 24/7 clocks of 4+ at decent voltages on air for an E0 stepping Q9550. Gigabyte isn't going to iron out bios wrinkles on their cheapest UD3, don't forget even the UD3R was easilly beaten in stability against the UD3P until two to three months ago when better bioses started popping up. Maybe it's late, but some strange hardware gets picked on this site to save $12.
    Reply
  • SlyNine
    I would have thought your OC would have been more limited by the 4pin CPU Power on the motherboard
    Reply
  • _horse
    Im diggin' the build here, regardless of newer hardware being available later, and prices dropping after purchase.

    Suggestion: Why not split these articles up into two forms? Why not submit an "initial/at time of order" article and have that listed first to let people argue, then do all the benchmarking and submit a followup article later, attached to the initial article?

    People can still bicker over price range and stuff before the benchmarks even come out, that way you know what/when the article is being based off of.

    I know, Im the new guy and Im probably spitting in to the wind here, but...

    :)

    -Horse
    Reply