Steam enforces Australian age verification via credit cards — debit card glitches and low credit adoption alienate core gamers, privacy-first mindset leads to dearth of options that may hinder consumers

Valve Steam Machine
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Today is September 9, and the significance of the date for Australian consumers is that, by law, buying online apps and games now requires an over-18 age verification step. The local law isn't specific about the exact type of verification, only that it offers "appropriate age assurance measures." Valve is complying by asking for a bank card rather than government ID or a biometric check. The problem in the land down under is that while credit cards seemingly all work, debit card support is spotty and conditional.

This situation isn't unique, as it's basically a repeat of the same existing scenario in the United Kingdom. Valve's privacy-minded approach is laudable, as a bank card only links a payment method to a name and address. Meanwhile, a government ID is a more dangerous document if it gets leaked; face scans are quite fallible and revealing, and biometrics are intrinsic to the person and not replaceable if exposed — unlike bank cards, which can be canceled and swapped in minutes.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Bruno Ferreira
Contributor

Bruno Ferreira is a contributing writer for Tom's Hardware. He has decades of experience with PC hardware and assorted sundries, alongside a career as a developer. He's obsessed with detail and has a tendency to ramble on the topics he loves. When not doing that, he's usually playing games, or at live music shows and festivals.

  • usertests
    "Steal" everything. Become an absolute nuisance.
    Reply
  • jmcgaw
    Of course no teen in Oz will be clever enough to use a parent's card for age verification.
    Reply
  • helper800
    jmcgaw said:
    Of course no teen in Oz will be clever enough to use a parent's card for age verification.
    That would be the parents problem that their teen is breaking the law.
    Reply
  • circadia
    helper800 said:
    That would be the parents problem that their teen is breaking the law.
    the point is that age verification is ineffective.
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    circadia said:
    the point is that age verification is ineffective.
    Not if the point of it is to have someone to point the blame at...
    Gov. is covered because they enforced age ver.
    Steam is covered because they implemented age ver.
    Now the parent(s) is the only person with blame...
    Reply
  • helper800
    circadia said:
    the point is that age verification is ineffective.
    Yes, but this would remove all doubt from a reasonable mind that the criminal intent is there on behalf of the underaged person, and it would point to the parents ineffectiveness to prevent them from doing such a thing.
    Reply