Sony confirms PS4 and PS5 digital games don't require an online check-in every 30 days — new DRM policy only checks once for license to combat against refund scams

(Image credit: PlayStation)

For the past few days, the internet has been in turmoil over a new DRM policy for PS4 and PS5 games that supposedly forces you to check in online every 30 days. Without an official statement, speculation only intensified with many jumping to conclusions. Some were trying to figure out how the licensing worked under the hood, but we finally have a concrete answer now from Sony itself.

Speaking to GameSpot, an SIE rep clarified that "a one-time online check is required to confirm the game's license, after which no further check-ins are required." That means any digital game you download will remain playable even without an internet connection after 30 days; it just needs the initial check-in to convert the temporary license into a permanent one.

Latest Videos From
Comment from r/PS5

By first issuing a temporary, online-only license that requires an internet connection, Sony prevents it from getting ripped. Once the console pings Sony servers and doesn't detect any funny business, it turns the license permanent, requiring no further check-ins. These changes were instated in the March firmware update for both PS4 and PS5 consoles, which means Sony recently became aware of the exploit.

Ultimately, it seems like nothing has really changed, and Sony is just trying to bolster precautionary measures against piracy. Clearly, this was an under-the-hood change that people weren't even supposed to find out about, but the validity period labels in the UI gave it away. But Sony did let the situation balloon to the point where even the iconic PS4 game-sharing ad on YouTube filled up with comments mocking the company for becoming what it once hated.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Hassam Nasir
Contributing Writer

Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.

  • redgarl
    xbox fanboy: BUT BUT BUT...
    Reply
  • logainofhades
    They changed course after receiving a heavy dose of backlash, imo.
    Reply
  • cknobman
    logainofhades said:
    They changed course after receiving a heavy dose of backlash, imo.
    I agree.
    This would have been part of the initial statement because Sony would not have wanted any of this backlash to happen to begin with.
    They were seeing what they could get away with and realized they pushed too far.
    Reply
  • calmwren555
    logainofhades said:
    They changed course after receiving a heavy dose of backlash, imo.
    False.

    First reports about the issue are from the end of March.

    Been working like that from that date, it's not something new that was discovered a week ago after Modded Warfare and Lance McDonald began spreading misinformation about the 30-day check-in, and then changed to make it harmless "after receiving a heavy dose of backlash". People reported games having a 30-day timer that disappeared after exactly two weeks, for weeks (sorry for repeating, but you get the idea), mostly on PSNProfiles and Reddit.

    The person that discovered how it works, didn't made Sony "change course", other than releasing that statement. People also blamed the firmware updates but the PS4 firmware was released on March 17, but first reported games were from more than a week later. Not sure why they started blaming the PS5 firmware, anyway.

    What if they're actually making a PROPER refunding system? (i.e. you play the game for less than *insert low time here* and still be eligible for a refund)

    Right now you can't be refunded if you simply download the game, except for very exceptional situations (i.e. CP2077)
    Reply